Cilgavimab and tixagevimab as pre-exposure prophylaxis in vaccine non-responder kidney transplant recipients during a period of prevalent SARS-CoV-2 BA.2 and BA.4/5 variants-a prospective cohort study (RESCUE-TX).

BACKGROUND: The response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination is severely impaired in patients on maintenance immunosuppression after kidney transplantation. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 194 kidney transplant recipients (KTR) who exhibited no response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations (i.e., SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies ≤264 U/mL) and had no prior documented infection. Patients received 300 mg of cilgavimab/tixagevimab as SARS-CoV-2 pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) between March 4, 2022, and May 3, 2022 and were contrasted to a matched cohort of 186 KTRs also without immunization again defined as SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies ≤264 U/mL and no documented prior infection. The primary outcome was the serum kinetics of cilgavimab/tixagevimab, the secondary endpoints were time to SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection, severity of disease and variant specific live viral in vitro neutralization tests of patient sera. FINDINGS: Longitudinal serum level monitoring showed a half-life of 91 days for both antibodies (95% CI 86-95 days for cilgavimab and 85-96 days for tixagevimab) in KTRs. In vitro neutralization tests showed effectiveness against the BA.2 omicron subvariant but not BA.5. The cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections until May 15, 2022, (BA.2 dominance) was 15/194 vs 36/186 in the PrEP and control group respectively (OR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.66) but was not different thereafter (BA.4/5 dominance). The number of severe infections during the BA.2 period was lower in the prophylaxis than in the control group (OR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.17-0.79). INTERPRETATION: This study showed that SARS-CoV-2 PrEP with cilgavimab/tixagevimab demonstrated clinical effectiveness against variants that are neutralised (BA.2) but not against BA.4/5. FUNDING: This study was funded by the Medical University of Vienna and an unrestricted grant from AstraZeneca (ESR-21-21585).

Real-world clinical outcomes of tixagevimab/cilgavimab in the Omicron outbreak in China: baseline characteristics and interim analysis of the CLEAR study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the real-world use and clinical outcomes of tixagevimab/cilgavimab in China during the Omicron outbreak in late 2022. METHODS: This observational, real-world study included patients who received tixagevimab/cilgavimab from July 9 to December 30, 2022, in Hainan, China. Here, we report the baseline and characteristics and interim analysis results of the clinical outcomes in those receiving at least one dose of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (300 mg) for pre-exposure prophylaxis. RESULTS: Among 248 subjects who received tixagevimab/cilgavimab, 229 subjects were included in this analysis. Until March 28, 2023, the median follow-up was 95 days. The mean age of the subjects was 44.4 ± 15.9 years, 11.8% were ≥ 65 years, and 41.5% were male. Fifty-eight (25.3%) subjects had comorbidities, 16.2% subjects had key immune compromised conditions. Seventy-two (32.6%) patients had laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or received healthcare within three months; 71/72 (98.6%) had mild disease, and one (1.4%) was moderate. No COVID-19-related intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation utilizations, or death occurred. Two (0.9%) patients required hospitalization. One (0.4%) serious adverse event occurred, which was considered unrelated to tixagevimab/cilgavimab. CONCLUSION: Among Chinese patients receiving prophylactic tixagevimab/cilgavimab, the incidence of COVID-19-related hospitalization, ICU admission, or death was low during the Omicron surge. Further randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are needed to determine the effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab in preventing severe COVID-19 outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with clinicaltrial.gov (NCT05917951).

Safety of intramuscular tixagevimab-cilgavimab (Evusheld®) administration in patients at risk of iatrogenic haematoma due to haematological disorders.

INTRODUCTION: Traditionally, intramuscular (IM) injections have been avoided in patients with haematological diseases due to the risk of iatrogenic haematoma. Tixagevimab-cilgavimab (Evusheld®) is a novel monoclonal antibody combination used as preexposure prophylaxis against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), for those at highest risk of severe infections. It is delivered as two separate IM injections (1.5 mL each). Patients with haematological disease are at higher risk for severe SARS-CoV-2 infections, which may be partially abrogated by the prophylactic inoculation of tixagevimab-cilgavimab. METHODS: A combined retrospective and prospective study of patients under the haematology service at a large metropolitan hospital receiving tixagevimab-cilgavimab was conducted. Tixagevimab-cilgavimab was administered IM to all patients, with platelet and factor replacement provided according to local protocols. Patients completed a numerical pain score daily for seven days following the injection, with scores ≥4/10 prompting an ultrasound to identify iatrogenic gluteal haematomas. RESULTS: The study recruited 131 patients; 66 patients were thrombocytopenic, including 10 patients with a platelet count <30 × 109/L. Fourteen patients (10.7%) received a single platelet transfusion prior to tixagevimab-cilgavimab administration, while two patients received fresh frozen plasma. No gluteal haematomas were identified, and only two patients reported an initial pain score of ≥4/10. CONCLUSIONS: The intramuscular administration of tixagevimab-cilgavimab in patients with haematological diseases was well tolerated and was not associated with iatrogenic haematoma.

Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab for COVID-19 Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in Hematologic Patients-A Tailored Approach Based on SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Response.

Patients with hematologic malignancies still face a significant risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-neutralizing monoclonal antibody combination tixagevimab/cilgavimab (TIX/CGB) could be administered to immunocompromised patients for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) before the emergence of TIX/CGB-resistant COVID-19 Omicron variants. TIX/CGB application could be carried out regardless of the host's immune response to previous active SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations or infections. Because the efficacy of COVID-19 PrEP remains unclear, especially in SARS-CoV-2-seropositive patients, German national guidelines recommended TIX/CGB PrEP only for SARS-CoV-2-seronegative patients in addition to an intensified active vaccination schedule. Having followed these guidelines, we now report the characteristics and outcomes of 54 recipients of TIX/CGB PrEP in SARS-CoV-2-seronegative patients with hematological disease from a German tertiary medical center and compare them to 125 seropositive patients who did not receive any PrEP. While the number of patients with B-cell lymphomas was significantly higher in the seronegative cohort (33 (61%) vs. 18 (14%) cases, p < 0.01), patients with myeloid diseases were significantly more frequent in the seropositive cohort (51 (41%) vs. 5 (9%) cases, p < 0.01). Strikingly, patients who had undergone allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation were significantly more likely (forty-nine (39%) vs. six (11%) cases, p < 0.01) to be SARS-CoV-2 seropositive. We observed that prophylactic application of TIX/CGB PrEP to a highly vulnerable group of SARS-CoV-2-seronegative patients resulted in a similar number of COVID-19 breakthrough infections compared to the untreated seropositive control group (16 (32%) vs. 39 (36%), p = 0.62) and comparable COVID-19-related outcomes like hospitalization and oxygen requirement throughout an extended follow-up period of 12 months. In conclusion, our results support the tailored approach of administering TIX/CGB PrEP only to SARS-CoV-2-seronegative patients during the COVID-19 pandemic and might provide a rationale for similar strategies during future outbreaks/diseases, especially in times of initial limited availability and/or financial constraints.

Efficacy of Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab as Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis against Infection from SARS-CoV-2 and Severe COVID-19 among Heavily Immunocompromised Patients: A Single-Center, Prospective, Real-World Study.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 continues to pose a threat to immunocompromised individuals, even with vaccination. The monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) tixagevimab/cilgavimab (TXG/CIL) provide targeted prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 with the benefit of a prolonged half-life. Although approved for COVID-19 prevention, there is limited data on their effectiveness among heavily immunocompromised populations. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational study at Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece, from August to December 2022 to investigate the efficacy of TXG/CIL as a form of pre-exposure prophylaxis in immunocompromised patients. Data on breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections were collected over a six-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Of the 375 participants (mean age 61.3 ± 14.1 years; 59.7% male), 76 (20.3%) developed breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections, with an incidence of 3.81 cases/100 patient months. Hospitalization was required for 21 patients (5.6%), with a median stay of 14 days. Seven deaths were recorded, with only one attributed to COVID-19. Previous infection (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26-0.82) and hybrid immunity (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29-0.92) can protect against new infection. Solid organ malignancy significantly increased the risk of severe outcomes among those infected (OR 7.4, 95% CI 2.2-24.7, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TXG/CIL provides effective prophylaxis against COVID-19 in immunocompromised patients. Future strategies should focus on developing new mAb combinations to address emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants and protect vulnerable populations.

Monoclonal Antibody Therapies Against SARS-CoV-2: Promises and Realities.

Monoclonal antibodies targeting the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 have been widely deployed in the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. I review here the impact of those therapeutics in the early pandemic, ranging from structural classification to outcomes in clinical trials to in vitro and in vivo evidence of basal and treatment-emergent immune escape. Unfortunately, the Omicron variant of concern has completely reset all achievements so far in mAb therapy for COVID-19. Despite the intrinsic limitations of this strategy, future developments such as respiratory delivery of further engineered mAb cocktails could lead to improved outcomes.

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Rates and Uptake of Tixagevimab-Cilgavimab Among a Cohort of Pediatric Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of data regarding SARS-CoV-2 vaccination rates and tixagevimab-cilgavimab (TC) uptake among pediatric solid organ transplant recipients. The purpose of our study was to assess these rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed vaccination records of pediatric recipients of heart, kidney, and liver transplants at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, who received a transplant between January 2011 and December 2021. All SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and doses of TC received on or before September 1, 2022, the date of approval of the bivalent SARS-CoV2 vaccine, were included. We also assessed whether patients had been seen by an infectious diseases physician (ID) in the preceding 6 months. RESULTS: Our study included 110 patients: 47 kidney, 36 heart, and 27 liver transplant recipients. All vaccine doses recorded were monovalent SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Sixty-eight (61.8%) patients received at least one vaccine. This varied by age group, with f of ≥12 years olds, 40.9% of 5-11 year olds and 14.3% of under 5 year olds (p = 0.001). Seven patients (6.4%) were up-to-date (UTD) for age. There was no difference in UTD status by organ type (p = 0.335). Patients who saw ID were significantly more likely to be UTD (13.2% versus 2.8%; p = 0.047). Among those eligible, 14 (18.2%) received TC, with rates not different based on transplanted organ type (p = 0.158) or whether they saw ID (p = 0.273). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the availability of vaccines, nearly 40% of pediatric solid organ transplant recipients remained unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 at time of the bivalent vaccine release. Less than a fifth of eligible patients received TC. Strategies to increase uptake of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines as well as adjunctive agents among this vulnerable group should be further explored.

Tolerability and outcomes with rollout of tixagevimab-cilgavimab in patients with common variable immunodeficiency.

Background: Tixagevimab-cilgavimab is a combination of 2 mAbs against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In December 2021, the Food and Drug Administration issued Emergency Use Authorization for intramuscular injection of tixagevimab-cilgavimab for prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 in immunocompromised patients. Shortly thereafter, our clinic distributed tixagevimab-cilgavimab to patients with common variable immunodeficiency. Objective: We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of tixagevimab-cilgavimab in a common variable immunodeficiency clinic. Methods: A retrospective chart review from February 1, 2022, to August 1, 2022, of 47 patients with common variable immunodeficiency who were offered tixagevimab-cilgavimab was carried out. Comparative outcomes of treatment and nontreatment groups examined the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and other non-SARS-CoV-2 infections. Results: Seventy percent of the patients were female; mean age was 49 years. Twenty-three patients received tixagevimab-cilgavimab, and 24 did not receive prophylaxis. In the tixagevimab-cilgavimab group, all were vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2 and 22 were receiving immunoglobulin replacement. One patient was infected with SARS-CoV-2, no patients required emergency care, and 7 patients had non-SARS-CoV-2 infection. In the cohort that did not receive prophylaxis, 21 were vaccinated, and all received immunoglobulin replacement. Two patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 1 patient required emergency care due to SARS-CoV-2 disease severity, and 4 patients had a non-SARS-CoV-2 infection. None of the results showed statistical significance. Conclusions: Although there is evidence that tixagevimab-cilgavimab can be protective against SARS-CoV-2 in immunocompromised individuals, our data suggest that this benefit may be blunted in patients with common variable immunodeficiency on immunoglobulin replacement. The additional benefit of tixagevimab-cilgavimab in immunocompromised patients already receiving replacement therapy requires further exploration.

Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab as SARS-CoV-2 Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in Lung Transplant Recipients during the Omicron Wave: A Real-World Monocentric Experience.

Lung transplant recipients (LTRs) respond poorly to vaccination. SARS-CoV-2 pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tixagevimab/cilgavimab (TIX/CIL) reduces the incidence of infection and the evolution to severe COVID-19. In vitro data show decreased activity against Omicron variants. We evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of TIX/CIL in LTRs during the Omicron wave. A prospective observational cohort study was conducted at ISMETT in Palermo (Italy). In June 2022, SARS-CoV-2 PrEP with TIX/CIL 150/150 mg was offered to LTRs. LTRs who received TIX/CIL were compared to LTRs who did not. Logistic regression analysis (adjusted for prior COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, age, years from transplant, and rejection) was performed. The objective of this study was to compare the following among the two populations: prevalence of SARS-CoV-2, length of SARS-CoV-2 positivity, and COVID-19 disease severity. Among 110 eligible LTRs, 79 (72%) received TIX/CIL and 31 (28%) did not. SARS-CoV-2 infections occurred in 6% (n = 5) of patients who received TIX/CIL and 29% (n = 9) of patients who did not (p < 0.001). In both groups, infections were mild/asymptomatic, and no one was hospitalized or died. At multivariate analysis, TIX/CIL was associated with a lower risk of infection (aOR 0.22; 95%CI 0.06-0.78; p = 0.02). TIX/CIL was safe and effective in reducing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 in LTRs during the Omicron wave.

Clinical characteristics and COVID-19-related outcomes of immunocompromised patients receiving tixagevimab/cilgavimab pre-exposure prophylaxis in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: Tixagevimab/cilgavimab is a cocktail of two long-acting monoclonal antibodies approved for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (cause of coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]) in immunocompromised (IC) or high-risk patients. We investigated the patient characteristics and clinical outcomes of IC patients administered tixagevimab/cilgavimab for PrEP in real-world use in Japan. METHODS: This observational study used anonymous secondary data from Real-World Data Co., Ltd. for IC patients aged ≥12 years administered tixagevimab/cilgavimab between September 2022 and September 2023. We analyzed the baseline characteristics and event-rates of COVID-19-related clinical outcomes within 6 months of administration. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 397 IC patients. About half (53.4 %) were male and the median age was 71.0 (interquartile range 61.0, 77.0) years. Malignancy (97.2 %), cardiovascular disease (71.3 %), and diabetes (66.5 %) were frequent comorbidities. Systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressants were prescribed to 87.4 % and 24.9 %, respectively. The two most common target clinical conditions were active therapy for hematologic malignancies (88.2 %) and treatment with B cell-depleting therapies (57.4 %). The event-rates per 100 person-months (95 % confidence interval; number) for medically attended COVID-19, COVID-19 hospitalization, in-hospital mortality due to COVID-19, and all-cause death were 4.14 (3.06-5.48; n = 49), 1.74 (1.09-2.64; n = 22), 0.07 (0.00-0.42; n = 1), and 0.60 (0.26-1.17; n = 8), respectively. CONCLUSION: This is the first report using a multicenter database to describe the clinical characteristics and COVID-19-related outcomes of IC patients administered with tixagevimab/cilgavimab in real-world settings in Japan. This cohort of IC patients who received tixagevimab/cilgavimab included many elderly patients with comorbidities.

[Effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab in reducing SARS-CoV-2 infections, hospitalizations and mortality in inmunocompromised patients]. / Efectividad de tixagevimab/cilgavimab en la reducción de la infección, ingresos hospitalarios y mortalidad por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes inmunodeprimidos.

INTRODUCTION: Inmunocompromised people have higher SARS-CoV-2 morbi-mortality and they are subsidiary to receive pre-exposure prophylaxis. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections, hospitalizations and mortality in immunocompromised patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 119 immunocompromised people>18 years old eligible of receiving Evusheld were followed for 6 months. People with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection or incomplete vaccination regimen were exluded. A total of 19 people who received Evusheld were matched by propensity score, using a 1:1 ratio, with another 19 people who did not receive Evusheld. Sociodemographic, related to SARS-CoV-2 risk factors and related to immunosuppression variables were included. The dependent variables were infection, hospitalization, and mortality related to SARS-CoV-2. Statistical analyzes were performed using SPSS Statistics 19.0, STATA 11.0, and the R statistical package. RESULTS: In total, 4 people in the Evusheld group and 11 in the control group had SARS-CoV-2 infection, showing an incidence rate of 3.87 and 13.62 per 100 person-months, respectively. The HR (Hazard Ratio) was 0.29 (95% CI=0.09-0.90) for SARS-CoV-2 infection, 0.37 (0.07-1.92) for SARS-CoV-2 hospitalization and, 0.23 (0.03-2.09) for SARS-CoV-2 mortality in the Evusheld group compared to control group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that Evusheld reduces the SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Tixagevimab/cilgavimab prophylaxis against COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Tix/Cil) shows promise as a prophylactic treatment against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). This study was performed to assess the effectiveness of Tix/Cil for preexposure prophylaxis against COVID-19 in this population. Methods: We systematically searched the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase databases to identify articles relevant to our study up to December 15, 2023. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (ver. 3.0) was used for data analysis. Results: The meta-analysis included seven eligible retrospective studies, encompassing a total of 4,026 SOTRs. The analysis revealed significant differences in SOTRs who received Tix/Cil preexposure prophylaxis relative to those who did not. Specifically, these differences were observed in the incidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (odds ratio [OR], 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15-0.60), hospitalization (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.08-0.70), and intensive care unit admission (OR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.02-0.22). However, mortality rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (P=0.06). Conclusions: The evidence supporting the effectiveness of Tix/Cil as preexposure prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 in SOTRs is of a low to moderate level. Further high-quality research is necessary to understand its effects on this population.

Risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 in hematological patients who received or not pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab: a target trial emulation.

We emulated a hypothetical target trial in which hematological subjects cared at the University Hospital of Pisa (Italy) received or not SARS-CoV-2 prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab. Subjects who received prophylaxis (cases) were compared to those who did not (controls). The main outcome was SARS-CoV-2 infection in the subsequent 6 months. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to adjust for confounders. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify variables associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We recruited 462 patients: 228 received prophylaxis, 234 were controls. COVID-19 was lower in cases compared to controls (16.7% vs 24.8%, p = 0.03, after IPW 14.3% vs 24.6%, p = 0.01). On multivariable analysis, B-cell depleting therapies (HR 2.09, 95%CI 1.05-4.18, p = 0.037) were associated with increased risk of COVID-19, while tixagevimab/cilgavimab prophylaxis (HR 0.45, 95%CI 0.27-0.73, p = 0.001) and previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (HR 0.27, 95%CI 0.14-0.51, p < 0.001) were protective. In conclusion, prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies may reduce the risk of COVID-19 in hematological patients.

New variants of COVID-19 (XBB.1.5 and XBB.1.16, the "Arcturus"): A review of highly questioned concerns, a brief comparison between different peaks in the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focused systematic review on expert recommendations for prevention, vaccination, and treatment measures in the general population and at-risk groups.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has taken many forms and continues to evolve, now around the Omicron wave, raising concerns over the globe. With COVID-19 being declared no longer a "public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC)," the COVID pandemic is still far from over, as new Omicron subvariants of interest and concern have risen since January of 2023. Mainly with the XBB.1.5 and XBB.1.16 subvariants, the pandemic is still very much "alive" and "breathing." METHODS: This review consists of five highly concerning questions about the current state of the COVID Omicron peak. We searched four main online databases to answer the first four questions. For the last one, we performed a systematic review of the literature, with keywords "Omicron," "Guidelines," and "Recommendations." RESULTS: A total of 31 articles were included. The main symptoms of the current Omicron wave include a characteristically high fever, coughing, conjunctivitis (with itching eyes), sore throat, runny nose, congestion, fatigue, body ache, and headache. The median incubation period of the symptoms is shorter than the previous peaks. Vaccination against COVID can still be considered effective for the new subvariants. CONCLUSION: Guidelines recommend continuation of personal protective measures, third and fourth dose boosters, along with administration of bivalent messenger RNA vaccine boosters. The consensus antiviral treatment is combination therapy using Nirmatrelvir and Ritonavir, and the consensus for pre-exposure prophylaxis is Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab combination. We hope the present paper raises awareness for the continuing presence of COVID and ways to lower the risks, especially for at-risk groups.

Serum AZD7442 (tixagevimab-cilgavimab) concentrations and in vitroIC50 values predict SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibody titres.

Objectives: The evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) necessitates rapid methods for assessing monoclonal antibody (mAb) potency against emerging variants. Authentic virus neutralisation assays are considered the gold standard for measuring virus-neutralising antibody (nAb) titres in serum. However, authentic virus-based assays pose inherent practical challenges for measuring nAb titres against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants (e.g. storing infectious viruses and testing at biosafety level-3 facilities). Here, we demonstrate the utility of pseudovirus neutralisation assay data in conjunction with serum mAb concentrations to robustly predict nAb titres in serum. Methods: SARS-CoV-2 nAb titres were determined via authentic- and lentiviral pseudovirus-based neutralisation assays using serological data from three AZD7442 (tixagevimab-cilgavimab) studies: PROVENT (NCT04625725), TACKLE (NCT04723394) and a phase 1 dose-ranging study (NCT04507256). AZD7442 serum concentrations were assessed using immunocapture. Serum-based half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were derived from pseudovirus nAb titres and serum mAb concentrations, and compared with in vitro IC50 measurements. Results: nAb titres measured via authentic- and lentiviral pseudovirus-based neutralisation assays were strongly correlated for the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 virus and SARS-CoV-2 Alpha. Serum AZD7442 concentrations and pseudovirus nAb titres were strongly correlated for multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants with all Spearman correlation coefficients ≥ 0.78. Serum-based IC50 values were similar to in vitro IC50 values for AZD7442, for ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and Alpha, Delta, Omicron BA.2 and Omicron BA.4/5 variants. Conclusions: These data highlight that serum mAb concentrations and pseudovirus in vitro IC50 values can be used to rapidly predict nAb titres in serum for emerging and historical SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Comprehensive procedure for injecting Evusheld® for hematological diseases in a single institute.

Tixagevimab and cilgavimab (EVA, Evusheld®), monoclonal antibody combination treatments, consisted of two neutralizing antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). EVA showed prophylactic and therapeutic effects against coronavirus disease 2019. The Japanese Society of Hematology recommended EVA for such patients with active treatment, but each institution decided on comprehensive administration. We develop a systematic procedure for comprehensive EVA injection prophylactically in patients with hematological malignancies without any over/under-indication. We listed all patients with the required indications from November 2022 to March 2023. We included 178 cases, 84 females and 94 males, with a median age of 70 (range: 19-90) years. Underlying diseases are myeloid neoplasms in 36 (20%), lymphoid neoplasms in 75 (73%), and others. Indications were intensively hematological malignancy treatment, rituximab treatment within 12 months, burton kinase inhibitor treatment, after chimeric antigen receptor T cell immunotherapy, and after stem cell transplantation in 74 (41%), 73 (41%), 3 (2%), 5 (3%), and 23 (13%) cases, respectively. Of the 178 cases, 22 (12.4%) refused EVA injection. Further, 42 and 136 cases were administered outpatient and inpatient, respectively. Over 95% of the listed cases received EVA injection within 3 months. No severe toxicities were observed among them (N = 156), and 8 (5.2%) cases had breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection, which was significantly lower (P = 0.02) than those without EVA (4 [18.2%] of 22 cases). Both groups showed no moderate or severe infection cases. This single-center experience showed that comprehensive EVA injection management effectively generated safer completion with preferable clinical impact.

Investigation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection status in solid organ transplant recipients treated with tixagevimab/cilgavimab.

INTRODUCTION: Tixagevimab and cilgavimab (T/C) are neutralizing antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that can be used to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, their neutralizing activity against recent variants was reduced, raising concerns regarding the emergence of breakthrough coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to investigate the status of the COVID-19 breakthrough after T/C administration. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated breakthrough COVID-19 in SOT recipients administered T/C at Kyoto University Hospital, Japan, from November 2022 to March 2023. Patients were monitored for 6 months after T/C administration. SARS-CoV-2 infection was diagnosed using polymerase chain reaction or antigen tests. The monthly incidence rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection were calculated using the person-time method. RESULTS: T/C were administered to 67 SOT recipients (liver, 16; lung, 36; and kidney, 15), of whom five were infected with SARS-CoV-2. All five cases were classified as mild, and none of these patients required admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) or died. All infected individuals tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 after March 2023, when T/C-resistant subvariant strains became predominant. The monthly incidence rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection, calculated using the person-time method, suggested an increasing trend. CONCLUSIONS: During the T/C-resistant variant epidemic, SARS-CoV-2 infections were identified even after T/C administration, suggesting that the prophylactic effects of T/C were invalid. Therefore, emerging variants must be carefully monitored and characterized to determine appropriate antiviral strategies, such as the use of suitable neutralizing antibodies.

Implementation of AZD7442 (Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab) COVID-19 Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in the Largest Health Maintenance Organization in Israel: Real-world Uptake and Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics Across Immunocompromised Patient Groups.

INTRODUCTION: AZD7442 is a combination of two neutralizing antibodies (tixagevimab/cilgavimab) with demonstrated efficacy in reducing the risk of symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among individuals at high risk of severe COVID-19 ≤ 6 months after administration. On February 15, 2022, the Israeli Ministry of Health (IMoH) authorized the administration of 300 mg AZD7442 as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection among immunocompromised individuals aged ≥ 12 years. This study describes the real-world uptake of AZD7442 in Israel. METHODS: This descriptive, observational study analyzed data from Israel's largest health maintenance organization, Clalit Health Services (CHS). Individuals were assessed for AZD7442 eligibility between February 13 and December 11, 2022, and were included if they were aged ≥ 12 years, had ≥ 1 year of continuous CHS membership, had ≥ 1 moderate or severe immunocompromising condition, and were eligible for AZD7442 per IMoH recommendations during this time frame. RESULTS: Overall, 19,161 AZD7442-eligible individuals with immunocompromising conditions were identified during the study period; 2829 (14.8%) received AZD7442. A higher proportion of individuals receiving AZD7442 were older (aged ≥ 65 years), male, not current smokers and residents in large cities; required more physician visits (> 50 visits); and had ≥ 1 COVID-19 hospitalization over 12 months, while uptake was lowest among ultra-orthodox Jewish individuals. AZD7442 uptake was also higher among individuals with multiple comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 5), including hypertension, diabetes and chronic kidney disease. In specific immunocompromised types, AZD7442 uptake was highest among individuals with lung transplantation (41%), primary immunodeficiency (32%), bone marrow transplantation (29%) and multiple myeloma (25%) or those receiving anti-CD20 therapy (26%) and was lowest in individuals with lymphoma (8%). CONCLUSION: These results show AZD7442 uptake among the eligible population of Israel in 2022 was relatively low, at 14.8%. Uptake was generally higher among immunocompromised individuals who may be perceived to be frail or at highest risk of COVID-19 infection and complications, although at 25-41%, further improvements in uptake would be more impactful. These results also indicate there is opportunity to expand AZD7442 uptake across immunocompromised groups and ensure more equitable uptake among some other sociodemographic groups. Overall, this study will help inform and reassess future implementation strategies for vulnerable populations.

Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab does not prevent COVID-19 in patients with multiple sclerosis and related disorders on B-cell depleting therapies.

BACKGROUND: Patients with MS and related disorders (pwMSARD) on B-cell depleting treatments have attenuated immune responses to vaccination and were eligible to receive tixagevimab/cilgavimab. OBJECTIVES: Understand incidence and severity of COVID-19 in pwMSARD on B-cell depleting therapies who received tixagevimab/cilgavimab compared to an untreated group. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective medical records review of adult pwMSARD on B-cell depleting treatments who received tixagevimab/cilgavimab between 1/2022-1/2023. PwMSARD on B-cell depleting treatments who did not served as a control group (CG). We compared COVID-19 incidence and severity within 6 months of tixagevimab/cilgavimab or rituximab/ocrelizumab infusion for the CG. RESULTS: 210 patients were identified, 135 in the treatment group (TG) and 75 in the CG. In the TG, 24 (17.8 %) developed COVID-19 compared to 12 (16 %) in the CG. There was no difference in the odds of developing COVID-19 in an unadjusted logistic regression model (OR=1.14; 95 % CI: 0.53, 2.42; p = 0.74) or after adjusting for age and disease duration (OR=1.05; 95 % CI: 0.47, 2.37; p = 0.91). There was also no difference in COVID-19 severity between groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in COVID-19 infection rates or severity in pwMSARD on B-cell depleting treatments who received tixagevimab/cilgavimab compared to those who remained untreated.

Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of AZD7442 (Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab) for Prevention of Symptomatic COVID-19: 15-Month Final Analysis of the PROVENT and STORM CHASER Trials.

INTRODUCTION: The phase 3 PROVENT and STORM CHASER studies evaluated AZD7442 (tixagevimab/cilgavimab) for pre-exposure and post-exposure prophylaxis of symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We report the final 15-month results of both studies. METHODS: In PROVENT, participants were randomized 2:1 to receive 300 mg AZD7442 (n = 3460) or placebo (n = 1737). In STORM CHASER, participants were enrolled within 8 days of exposure to a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-infected individual and randomized 2:1 to receive 300 mg AZD7442 (n = 749) or placebo (n = 372). RESULTS: In PROVENT, the relative risk reduction (RRR) in symptomatic COVID-19 for AZD7442 versus placebo was 76.7% at primary analysis [95% confidence interval (CI) 46.1, 90.0; p < 0.001], 83.0% at day 183 (95% CI 67.3, 91.2; nominal p < 0.001), and 46.3% at day 366 (95% CI 23.1, 62.4; nominal p < 0.001). Severe/critical COVID-19 was reduced by 91.4% with AZD7442 versus placebo by day 366 (95% CI 61.3, 98.1; nominal p < 0.0001). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 58.2% and 58.0% of participants administered AZD7442 or placebo, respectively; serious AEs (SAEs) occurred in 6.2% and 5.6%, respectively. In STORM CHASER, the RRR in symptomatic COVID-19 for AZD7442 versus placebo was 33.3% at primary analysis (95% CI - 25.9, 64.7; p = 0.212), 43.3% at day 183 (95% CI 1.4, 67.4; nominal p = 0.044) and 3.4% at day 366 (95% CI - 35.6, 31.2; nominal p = 0.842). Severe/critical COVID-19 did not occur in participants receiving AZD7442 versus 0.5% of participants receiving placebo by day 366. AEs occurred in 46.5% and 51.9% of participants administered AZD7442 or placebo, respectively; SAEs occurred in 2.7% and 4.3%, respectively. In both studies, serum concentration-time profiles over 457 days were similar for tixagevimab and cilgavimab and consistent with the extended half-life reported for AZD7442 (approximately 90 days). CONCLUSION: This analysis provides proof of concept supporting long-term safety of intramuscularly administered AZD7442 for prevention of symptomatic/severe COVID-19. A graphical abstract is available with this article. GOV IDENTIFIERS: PROVENT (NCT04625725) and STORM CHASER (NCT04625972).

Antibodies are proteins produced by the body's immune system to specifically target foreign substances, such as viruses. AZD7442 is made up of an antibody pair (tixagevimab and cilgavimab) that specifically bind and neutralize severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). AZD7442 was designed to give several months of protection against the virus. These antibodies were tested in two clinical trials to see if they could either protect people from getting COVID-19 (PROVENT trial) or prevent people already exposed to SARS-CoV-2 from getting COVID-19 (STORM CHASER trial). In the two trials, approximately 6000 adults received AZD7442 or placebo (injections that look exactly like AZD7442 but contain no medicine). Protection against COVID-19 was monitored for up to 1 year, and safety for up to 15 months. The percentage of trial participants who reported side effects was similar in the AZD7442 and placebo groups, in both trials. The PROVENT trial showed that AZD7442 reduced the risk of getting COVID-19 up to 6 months and protected against severe COVID-19 for up to 1 year. In STORM CHASER, participants were treated after SARS-CoV-2 exposure but before a positive COVID-19 test. Some participants were already infected with SARS-CoV-2 at the start of the trial, others were not. STORM CHASER showed that AZD7442 protected people against COVID-19 for up to 6 months if they were not already infected at the start. The results of these trials provide proof of concept to support the long-term safety of AZD7442 for the prevention of COVID-19.