Use of the MS-MLPA assay in prenatal diagnosis of Prader-Willi syndrome with mosaic trisomy 15.

OBJECTIVE: We present a prenatal diagnosis strategy of using Methylation-Specific Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MS-MLPA) for the detection of maternal uniparental disomy 15/trisomy 15 (UPD(15) mat/T15) mosaicism. CASE REPORT: A 43-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 19 weeks of gestation due to a high risk of trisomy 15 (T15) as indicated by non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). Cytogenetic analysis revealed a karyotype of 46, XX of cultured amniocytes. Further analysis using copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) analysis showed 55 % T15 mosaicism. The second amniocentesis was performed and showed a karyotype of 46, XX and 26 % T15 mosaicism by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). MS-MLPA analysis of uncultured amniocytes showed that the copy number ratio of 15q11-13 ranged from 1.3 to 1.5, and the percentage of methylation was between 70 % and 100 %. MS-MLPA assay of cultured amniocytes showed a copy number ratio of 1 and a methylation percentage of 100 %. Therefore, this fetus was identified to be an UPD(15) mat/T15 mosaicism. The parents decided to terminate the pregnancy. CONCLUSION: MS-MLPA can be used in combination with karyotype and CNV-seq for prenatal diagnosis of NIPT high-risk T15 to avoid missed diagnosis of UPD(15) mat/T15 mosaicism.

Cytogenetics in the management of clonal chromosomal abnormalities of undetermined significance and persistent polyclonal B-cell lymphocytosis: Guidelines from the Groupe Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique (GFCH).

Acquired clonal chromosomal abnormalities (CAs) are usually considered to be disease-related. However, when a CA of this type is the only abnormality present (and especially in small clones), the clinical significance is unclear. Here, we review the literature on recurrent CAs whose significance is regularly subject to debate. Our objective was to help with their interpretation and develop guidelines for sex chromosome loss, trisomy 15, trisomy 8, deletion 20q and other isolated non-myelodysplastic neoplasm (MDS)-defining CAs. We suggest that non-MDS-defining CAs correspond to clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) in the absence of cytopenia and clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) in the presence of cytopenia. Lastly, we review the literature on persistent polyclonal binucleated B-cell lymphocytosis; although usually benign, this condition may correspond to a premalignant state.

Tissue specific trisomy 15 mosaicism associated with urogenital malformations.

We describe a boy born with hypospadias and later diagnosed with vesicoureteral reflux and mild cognitive disability. Routine diagnostic investigation by karyotyping, chromosomal microarray (CMA) and trio analysis with whole exome sequencing was normal. However, later CMA performed on DNA from genital tissue showed trisomy 15, which prompted further analysis. Fluorescent in situ hybridization was performed to verify the CMA result and delineate the mosaic rate. Methylation specific MLPA was performed to investigate the parent of origin of the extra chromosome 15. Further medical examination of the boy identified fine Blaschko's lines, indicative of mosaicism, but earlier unnoticed. CMA on genital tissue showed 80% mosaicism for trisomy 15. Bladder mucosa and muscle showed a high degree of trisomy 15 (56% and 45% respectively), while buccal mucosa and abdominal skin showed low-grade or no trisomy 15. The extra chromosome 15 was of maternal origin. This case report describes a boy with two different malformations in the same organ region that carries a high degree of trisomy 15 mosaicism. Hence, the clinical implication is that there is no recurrence risk for sibs, but the boy in his turn risks producing gametes with an extra chromosome 15. Tissue restricted mutations are not commonly described but may cause congenital malformations that affects the information to the family.

Low-level mosaic trisomy 15 at amniocentesis without uniparental disomy 15 in a pregnancy associated with cytogenetic discrepancy between uncultured amniocytes and cultured amniocytes, a favorable fetal outcome and perinatal decrease of the aneuploid cell line.

OBJECTIVE: We present low-level mosaic trisomy 15 without uniparental disomy (UPD) 15 in a pregnancy associated with cytogenetic discrepancy between uncultured amniocytes and cultured amniocytes, a favorable fetal outcome and perinatal decrease of the aneuploid cell line. CASE REPORT: A 40-year-old, gravida 2, para 0, woman underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because advanced maternal age. This pregnancy was conceived by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+15 [7]/46,XX [43]. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed arr (15) × 2-3 (X) × 2 with 14% mosaicism for trisomy 15, and ME028 multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) methylation test excluded UPD 15. Prenatal ultrasound and parental karyotypes were normal. She was referred for genetic counseling, and repeat amniocentesis performed at 28 weeks of gestation revealed 46, XX (20/20 colonies) in cultured amniocytes, and in uncultured amniocytes, interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) showed 13.7% (16/117 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 15, aCGH analysis revealed arr [GRCh(hg19)] 15q11.22q26.3 (22, 765, 628-102,256,748) × 2.4 with a log2 ratio = 0.26, consistent with 40% mosaicism for trisomy 15, and quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) assays excluded UPD 15. The woman was encouraged to continue the pregnancy. At 37 weeks of gestation, a 2400-g phenotypically normal female baby was delivered without any abnormality. The cord blood had 46, XX (40/40 cells). QF-PCR assays determined maternal origin of trisomy 15 in the placenta. When follow-up at age 5 months, the neonate was normal in physical and psychomotor development. FISH analysis on 102 buccal mucosal cells detected 2 cells (2%, 2/102 cells) with trisomy 15 signals, compared with 1% in normal control. CONCLUSIONS: Low-level mosaic trisomy 15 at amniocentesis without UPD 15 can be a transient and benign condition, and can be associated with a favorable fetal outcome and perinatal decrease of the aneuploid cell line.

Mosaic embryo transfer-first report of a live born with nonmosaic partial aneuploidy and uniparental disomy 15.

Objective: To inform clinicians of the first known case of a live born diagnosed with syndromic partial trisomy 15 and maternal uniparental disomy 15 resulting from a mosaic embryo transfer (MET). We believe that this case will highlight the need for standardized practice guidelines to address the potential risk of MET and the importance of prenatal follow-up after a pregnancy is achieved from a MET. Design: Case report. Setting: In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and MET was completed at a fertility clinic in Canada. Postnatal testing and diagnosis were performed at the Medical Genetics Department of a hospital in Canada. Patients: A newborn male with a diagnosis of partial trisomy 15 and uniparental disomy (UPD) 15. Interventions: Mosaic embryo transfer after PGT-A was performed. Diagnostic testing performed after birth included a karyotype, fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis, chromosomal microarray, and microsatellite UPD testing. Main Outcome Measures: Confirmed nonmosaic partial aneuploidy of trisomy 15 and UPD15 in a symptomatic newborn conceived from MET. Results: Singleton pregnancy was achieved after a double embryo transfer involving 1 embryo diagnosed by PGT-A with high-level mosaic trisomy 15 and high-level mosaic deletion on chromosome 20 (mos(del(20)(q11.23-qter)). Routine prenatal screening and detailed fetal ultrasound did not identify any concerns. Postnatal genetic investigations, triggered by feeding difficulties in the newborn period, diagnosed the proband with maternal UPD15 and a supernumerary marker chromosome composed of 2 noncontiguous regions of chromosome 15. This karyotype is likely resulting from incomplete trisomy rescue occurring on the paternal chromosome 15. Conclusions: This case highlights the need for better guidelines and management of pregnancies achieved after MET.

Cytogenetic discrepancy between uncultured amniocytes and cultured amniocytes in mosaic trisomy 15 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome.

OBJECTIVE: We present prenatal diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 15 in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome. CASE REPORT: A 33-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 19 weeks of gestation because non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) revealed gene dosage increase at chromosome 15. Cytogenetic analysis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+15[10]/46,XX[13]. Using uncultured amniocytes, array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) revealed arr [GRCh37] (X) × 2, (15) × 3 [0.75], multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis showed rsa [GRCh36] 15q11q13 (21,362,818-27,196,819) × 3 [0.76] and methylation-specific (MS)-MLPA analysis showed a methylation index = 0.41 with paternal gene dosage increase at 15q11-q13. Repeat amniocentesis at 25 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+15[6]/46,XX[14]. Using uncultured amniocytes, quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) assays excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 15 and determined a paternal origin of the extra chromosome 15, aCGH analysis showed 75%-80% mosaicism for trisomy 15, and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) showed 45.5% (46/101 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 15. Repeat amniocentesis at 28 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+15[2]/46,XX[23]. Using uncultured amniocytes, aCGH showed 75-80% mosaicism for trisomy 15, and FISH showed 70.6% (72/102 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 15. Using cultured amniocytes, QF-PCR assays excluded UPD 15. Cordocentesis at 30 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+15[2]/46,XX[138]. Using cord blood, aCGH revealed 9% gene dosage increase at chromosome 15, and MS-MLPA analysis excluded UPD 15. At 36 weeks of gestation, a 2060-g phenotypically normal baby was delivered. The cord blood had 46, XX (40/40 cells). The placenta had 47,XX,+15 (40/40 cells). QF-PCR analysis on placenta showed a paternal origin of trisomy 15. FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells at age 20 days showed 20% (20/100 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 15. CONCLUSION: Cytogenetic discrepancy may occur between uncultured and cultured amniocytes in mosaic trisomy 15 at amniocentesis. Cultured amniocytes may present progressive decrease in the levels of mosaicism for trisomy 15 as the fetus grows. Mosaic trisomy 15 at amniocentesis without UPD 15 can be associated with a favorable outcome.

Prenatal diagnosis of partial monosomy 8p (8p23.2→pter) and partial trisomy 15q (15q21.2→qter) and incidental detection of a familial chromosome translocation of paternal origin in a pregnancy associated with increased nuchal translucency and an abnormal maternal serum screening result.

OBJECTIVE: We present partial monosomy 8p (8p23.2→pter) and partial trisomy 15q (15q21.2→qter) and incidental detection of a familial chromosome translocation of paternal origin in a pregnancy associated with increased nuchal translucency (NT) and an abnormal maternal serum screening result. CASE REPORT: A 29-year-old primigravid woman underwent chorionic villus sampling (CVS) at 13 weeks of gestation because of an increased NT thickness of 3.2 mm at 12 weeks of gestation and an abnormal maternal serum screening for Down syndrome result with a calculated risk of 1/29. Her husband was 33 years old, and there was no family history of congenital malformations. CVS revealed a derived chromosome 8 or der(8). Cytogenetic analysis of the parents revealed a karyotype of 46,XY,t(8;15)(p21.3;q13) in the father and a karyotype of 46,XX in the mother. The CVS result was 46,XY,der(8)t(8;15)(p21.3;q13)pat. The woman requested for amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed a result of arr 8p23.3p23.2 (191,530-2,625,470) × 1.0, arr 15q21.2q26.3 (50,903,432-102,338,129) × 3.0 with a 2.434-Mb deletion of 8p23.3-p23.2 including DLGAP2, CLN8 and ARHGEF10, and a 51.435-Mb duplication of 15q21.2-q26.3 including CYP19A1 and IGF1R. Conventional cytogenetic analysis of cultured amniocytes revealed the result of 46,XY,der(8) t(8;15)(p23.2;q21.2)pat in the fetus. The pregnancy was subsequently terminated, and a malformed fetus was delivered with characteristic craniofacial dysmorphism. CONCLUSION: Maternal serum screening and NT screening may incidentally detect familial unbalanced reciprocal translocations, and aCGH analysis is useful for a precise determination of the breakpoints of the translocation and the involvement of the related genes under such a circumstance.

Placental Expression of the Forelimb Patterning Transcription Factor MEIS2 in Trisomy 15.

BackgroundObservations of first trimester human trisomy 15 (T15) embryos have identified meromelic changes in the upper limbs. These changes are similar to those observed in animal studies investigating the effects of overexpression of Meis2, a signaling transcription factor expressed during forelimb development. Although it would be exceedingly difficult to assess MEIS2 expression in the human embryonic arm, MEIS2 has been reported as consistently expressed in first trimester placental villus stroma. Methods: This study addresses whether gene dosage effect might underlie meromelia in T15 by comparing MEIS2 expression in placentas from T15 and euploid spontaneous abortions employing manual and automated assessment of MEIS2 immunohistochemical scoring. Results: Average MEIS2 expression is increased in T15 first trimester placental tissue compared to euploid controls but that the difference is marginal. Manual and automated scoring showed moderately strong correlation. Conclusion: Extrapolation of these results suggests MEIS2 overexpression may not be required for meromelia in T15.

Cytogenetic discrepancy between uncultured amniocytes and cultured amniocytes in mosaic trisomy 15 at amniocentesis.

OBJECTIVE: We present mosaic trisomy 15 at amniocentesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 41-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because of an abnormal non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) result suspicious of trisomy 15. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XY. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) on uncultured amniocytes revealed 26% mosaicism for trisomy 15. She was referred for repeat amniocentesis. aCGH, interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) assays and/or conventional cytogenetic analysis were applied on various cells and tissues including uncultured amniocytes, cultured amniocytes, cord blood, placenta, parental bloods and/or buccal mucosal cells. RESULTS: Repeat amniocentesis at 21 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 46, XY in cultured amniocytes, and 30% mosaicism for trisomy 15 by aCGH and 32% mosaicism for trisomy 15 by FISH in uncultured amniocytes. Repeat amniocentesis at 29 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 46, XY in cultured amniocytes, and 15% mosaicism for trisomy 15 by aCGH and 7.2% mosaicism for trisomy 15 by FISH in uncultured amniocytes. QF-PCR on cultured amniocytes excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 15. A phenotypically normal baby was delivered subsequently with a karyotype of 46, XY in cord blood and 2% mosaicism for trisomy 15 by FISH in buccal mucosal cells. The aCGH analysis revealed trisomy 15 in placenta and no genomic imbalance in cord blood. QF-PCR assays determined a maternal origin of trisomy 15 in placenta. CONCLUSION: Cytogenetic discrepancy may occur between uncultured and cultured amniocytes in mosaic trisomy 15 at amniocentesis. The cells of trisomy 15 cell line in prenatally detected mosaic trisomy 15 may decrease in number as the fetus grows. Whenever NIPT suspects trisomy 15, a confirmatory amniocentesis should include genetic analysis on both uncultured and cultured amniocytes to exclude mosaic trisomy 15 and maternal UPD 15, especially when the cultured amniocytes have a normal karyotype.

Prenatal diagnosis of Prader-Willi syndrome due to uniparental disomy with NIPS: Case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: PWS is challenging to diagnose prenatally due to a lack of precise and well-characterized fetal phenotypes and noninvasive markers. Here we present the case of prenatal diagnosis of Prader-Willi syndrome, which was suspected with whole-genome NIPS. METHODS: Whole-genome noninvasive prenatal screening showed a high risk for trisomy 15. Amniocentesis followed by FISH analysis and SNP-based chromosomal microarray was performed. RESULTS: Simultaneous analysis of maternal and fetal samples with SNP microarrays demonstrated maternal uniparental disomy (UPD). CONCLUSION: The presented case is the first case of PWS described in detail, which was suspected by NIPS results. It demonstrates that the choice of confirmation methods concerning the time needed is crucial for the right diagnosis. We suppose that prenatal testing of UPD is essential for chromosome regions, which play a key role in the appearance of various gene-imprinting failure syndromes like PWS or AS.

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of a duplication of 15q24.2-q26.2 associated with anencephaly and neural tube defect.

OBJECTIVE: We present molecular cytogenetic characterization of a duplication of 15q24.2-q26.2 associated with anencephaly and neural tube defect (NTD). CASE REPORT: A 35-year-old pregnant woman was found to have a fetus with anencephaly by prenatal ultrasound at 12 weeks of gestation. The pregnancy was subsequently terminated, and a malformed fetus was delivered with anencephaly. Cytogenetic analysis of the cultured placental tissues revealed a karyotype of 46,XX,dup(15) (q24.2q26.2). Parental karyotypes were normal. Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis of the placental tissues revealed a 20.36-Mb duplication of 15q24.2-q26.2 encompassing 100 Online Mendelian Inheritance of in Man (OMIM) genes including LINGO1, MTHFS, KIF7 and CHD2. Metaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis using 15q25.1-specidic probe confirmed a duplication of 15q25.1. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis showed a maternal origin of the duplication. CONCLUSION: A duplication of chromosome 15q24.2-q26.2 can be associated with NTD.

Mosaic trisomy 15 at amniocentesis: Prenatal diagnosis, molecular genetic analysis and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: To present prenatal diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 15 at amniocentesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 37-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Cytogenetic analysis of cultured amniocytes revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+15[2]/46,XY[17]. She was referred for repeated amniocentesis at 19 weeks of gestation. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction assays on uncultured amniocytes, conventional cytogenetic analysis and aCGH on cultured amniocytes, and FISH on uncultured urinary cells after birth were applied. Cordocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XY. RESULTS: At repeated amniocentesis, cultured amniocytes revealed a karyotypes of 46,XY [22 colonies], FISH on uncultured amniocytes revealed 21.2% (22/104 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 15, aCGH on uncultured amniocytes revealed a genomic gain (log2 ratio = 0.3) in chromosome 15, quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction on uncultured amniocytes excluded uniparental disomy 15 (UPD 15), and aCGH on culture amniocytes revealed no genomic imbalance in chromosome 15. A healthy 3700 g male baby was delivered at 38 weeks of gestation with no phenotypic abnormalities at age 6 months. FISH on uncultured urinary cells at birth and at age 6 months revealed mosaic trisomy 15 levels of 20% (13/65 cells) and 12.2% (6/49 cells), respectively. CONCLUSION: Prenatal diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 15 at amniocentesis should alert doctors about the occurrence of UPD 15 and a clinically significant phenotype. The present case provides evidence for cytogenetic discrepancy between uncultured and cultured amniocytes in mosaic trisomy 15 at amniocentesis. It is possible that the abnormal cell lines of amniocytes with trisomy 15 disappear after long-term cell culture.

Mosaic trisomy 15 in a liveborn infant.

With only a small number of cases in the medical literature, mosaic trisomy 15 in liveborn infants is very rare. Despite its rarity, similar features among individuals have been described, including intrauterine growth retardation, craniofacial abnormalities and facial dysmorphisms, cardiac disease, and other organ anomalies. Very few liveborns have survived the first year of life. We report here on a term infant with growth restriction and multiple congenital anomalies who was found to have mosaic trisomy 15. The proband presented with some frequently reported findings such as dysmorphic facies and overlapping fingers, and the uncommon finding of whorled hypopigmentation. Previously unreported findings include abnormal cerebral vasculature and dysplastic kidneys. We add this new phenotypic information to widen the spectrum previously reported and provide a review of the literature to date.

Isolated +15 in bone marrow: disease-associated or a benign finding?

It has been controversial if trisomy 15 (+15) as an isolated clonal cytogenetic abnormality in bone marrow (BM) is disease-associated or a benign finding. To answer this question, we retrospectively reviewed our cytogenetic archives and identified 31 patients with isolated +15. Four patients presented with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), +15 was the major clone (56-95% of interphases) in BM and the clonal size of +15 was correlated with blast burden and disease status. For the remaining 27 patients, +15 was a minor clone (3-24% of interphases) in BM. Eighteen patients had a history of cytotoxic therapies and developed +15 after a median latency interval of 34 months. Six patients had BM involvement by lymphoma or myeloma, and +15 was exclusively detected in myeloid and erythroid cells, not in lymphoma or myeloma cells. With a median follow-up of 28 months, none of these 27 patients had clinical or morphological evidence of myelodysplastic syndromes. We conclude that +15 can be associated with AML, but more often isolated +15 presents as a minor clone in BM, and may not be disease associated. Clinical follow-up rather than an immediate therapeutic intervention seems most appropriate for non-leukemic patients with isolated +15.

Partial trisomy of chromosome 15q and partial monopsony of 6q due to maternal balanced translocation.

A 7-month-old male presented with developmental delay and multiple congenital anomalies. He was found to have partial trisomy for the distal segment of chromosome 15 (q22-qter). Chromosome analysis of the mother showed a reciprocal balanced translocation between long arms of chromosome 6 and 15, t (6;15)(q26;q22).

Nature of nontargeted radiation effects observed during fractionated irradiation-induced thymic lymphomagenesis in mice.

Changes in the thymic microenvironment lead to radiation-induced thymic lymphomagenesis, but the phenomena are not fully understood. Here we show that radiation-induced chromosomal instability and bystander effects occur in thymocytes and are involved in lymphomagenesis in C57BL/6 mice that have been irradiated four times with 1.8-Gy γ-rays. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) were generated in descendants of irradiated thymocytes during recovery from radiation-induced thymic atrophy. Concomitantly, descendants of irradiated thymocytes manifested DNA lesions as revealed by γ-H2AX foci, chromosomal instability, aneuploidy with trisomy 15 and bystander effects on chromosomal aberration induction in co-cultured ROS-sensitive mutant cells, suggesting that the delayed generation of ROS is a primary cause of these phenomena. Abolishing the bystander effect of post-irradiation thymocytes by superoxide dismutase and catalase supports ROS involvement. Chromosomal instability in thymocytes resulted in the generation of abnormal cell clones bearing trisomy 15 and aberrant karyotypes in the thymus. The emergence of thymic lymphomas from the thymocyte population containing abnormal cell clones indicated that clones with trisomy 15 and altered karyotypes were prelymphoma cells with the potential to develop into thymic lymphomas. The oncogene Notch1 was rearranged after the prelymphoma cells were established. Thus, delayed nontargeted radiation effects drive thymic lymphomagenesis through the induction of characteristic changes in intrathymic immature T cells and the generation of prelymphoma cells.