RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of thrombosis. They often need parenteral nutrition (PN) requiring intravenous access for prolonged periods. We assessed the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) associated with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and tunneled catheters for patients with IBD receiving home PN (HPN). METHODS: Using the Cleveland Clinic HPN Registry, we retrospectively studied a cohort of adults with IBD who received HPN between June 30, 2019 and January 1, 2023. We collected demographics, catheter type, and catheter-associated DVT (CADVT) data. We performed descriptive statistics and Poisson tests to compare CADVT rates among parameters of interest. We generated Kaplan-Meier graphs to illustrate longevity of CADVT-free survival and a Cox proportional hazard model to calculate the hazard ratio associated with CADVT. RESULTS: We collected data on 407 patients, of which, 276 (68%) received tunneled catheters and 131 (32%) received PICCs as their initial catheter. There were 17 CADVTs with an overall rate of 0.08 per 1000 catheter days, whereas individual rates of DVT for PICCs and tunneled catheters were 0.16 and 0.05 per 1000 catheter days, respectively (P = 0.03). After adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidity, CADVT risk was significantly higher for PICCs compared with tunneled catheters, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.962 (95% CI=1.140-7.698; P = 0.025) and adjusted incidence rate ratio of 3.66 (95% CI=2.637-4.696; P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that CADVT risk is nearly three times higher with PICCs compared with tunneled catheters. We recommend tunneled catheter placement for patients with IBD who require HPN infusion greater than 30 days.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Nutrição Parenteral no Domicílio , Trombose Venosa , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Trombose Venosa/etiologia , Trombose Venosa/epidemiologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Adulto , Nutrição Parenteral no Domicílio/efeitos adversos , Nutrição Parenteral no Domicílio/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos de Coortes , Sistema de Registros , IdosoRESUMO
Background: Tunneled central venous catheters are commonly used for dialysis in patients without a functional permanent vascular access. In an emergent setting, a non-tunneled, temporary central venous catheter is often placed for immediate dialysis. The most critical step in the catheter insertion is venipuncture, which is often a major cause for longer intervention times and procedure-related adverse events. To avoid this critical step when placing a more permanent tunneled catheter, an exchange over a previously placed temporary one can be considered. In this paper, we present a modified switching approach with a separate access site. Methods: In this retrospective analysis of a prospective database, we examined whether this modified technique is non-inferior to a de novo application. Therefore, we included all 396 patients who received their first tunneled dialysis catheter at our site from March 2018 to March 2023. Out of these, 143 patients received the modified approach and 253 the standard de novo ultrasound-guided puncture and insertion. Then, the outcomes of the two groups, including adverse events and infections, were compared by nonparametric tests and multivariable logistic regression. Results: In both groups, the implantations were 100% successful. Catheter explantation due to infection according to CDC criteria was necessary in 18 cases, with no difference between the groups (5.0% vs. 4.4% p = 0.80). The infection rate per 100 days was 0.113 vs. 0.106 in the control group, with a comparable spectrum of bacteria. A total of 12 catheters (3 vs. 9) had to be removed due to a periinterventional complication. An early-onset infection was the reason in two cases (1.3%) in the study group and five in the control group (1.9%). A total misplacement of the catheter occurred in two cases only in the control group. After adjustment for potential confounders via multivariable logistic regression there was not a significant difference in the complication rate (adjusted odds ratio, aOR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.14-2.03, p = 0.351) but an estimated decreased risk overall based on the average treatment effect of -1.7% in favor of the study group. Conclusions: The present study shows that a catheter exchange leads to no more infections than a de novo placement; hence, it is a feasible method. Moreover, misplacements and control chest X-rays to exclude pneumothorax after venipuncture were completely avoided by exchanging. This approach yields a much lower infection rate than previous reports: 1.3% compared to 2.7% in all existing aggregated studies. The presented approach seems to be superior to existing switching methods. Overall, an exchange can also help to preserve veins for future access, since the same jugular vein is used.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: A hemodialysis tunneled catheter is one option for vascular access used with hemodialysis patients; however, catheter complications such as thrombosis are still inevitable. To prevent thrombosis formation, a catheter-locking solution is instilled between dialysis sessions. Heparin is used as a default locking solution in our Hemodialysis Care Project centers, while a recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) such as alteplase is used to treat suspected catheter thrombosis. This study aimed to identify the clinical factors, catheter brands, and hemodialysis variables that influence the choice of use for alteplase versus heparin, for those patients with tunneled catheters, and reduce overprescribing of high-alert medication alteplase. METHODS: A retrospective medical chart review study was conducted involving 230 patients with tunneled catheters; the first group of 133 patients used alteplase regularly three times a week, while the second group of 97 patients completed at least one year using the same catheter access with heparin lock only. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression and logistic regression analysis showed a significant association (p < 0.05) between different variables. Results suggest that overweight and hyperlipidemia patients are more likely to use alteplase. Patients using brand-name catheters such as Hemostar/Vas-cath (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) are less likely to use heparin than those using Medcomp catheters (Medcomp, Yuma, AZ). In addition, patients having a history of angioplasty would be less likely to have heparin than no angioplasty. Moreover, if the patient's fluid removal were equal to or less than 2 kg, they would be more likely to use heparin and vice versa. CONCLUSION: The study postulates that identified variables affect whether alteplase or heparin is used in hemodialysis tunneled catheters, and may be useful to increase awareness, improve practices, or judiciously control the use of alteplase within Saudi Arabia and globally.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To identify underlying factors associated with single versus multiple expulsions of tunneled hemodialysis catheter cuffs and their associated complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter, five-year retrospective data analysis was conducted on hemodialysis patients with tunneled catheters. Patient data included age, gender, BMI, and associated comorbidities. The type of procedure (new tunnel insertion vs. exchange), exit site infection, and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) were also included. RESULTS: The data of 122 patients was analyzed. Seventy-eight patients had diabetes mellitus, 102 patients had hypertension, and 24 had ischemic heart disease. Fifty-one patients were on antiplatelet therapy, and nine patients were on oral steroids. The access site for 98 patients was the right internal jugular; for 19 patients, it was the left internal jugular; five patients had a femoral dialysis catheter. Patients were grouped into two categories: those with single cuff extrusion episodes and those with multiple cuff-out episodes. Sixty-three patients had one cuff extrusion, and 59 had multiple cuff-out episodes during the study period. Patients who had CRBSI and hypertension and were aged between 61 and 95 had multiple episodes of cuff extrusion and reached statistical significance. Exit-site infection, diabetes mellitus, antiplatelet therapy, gender, catheter site, and BMI had no statistical significance between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Tunneled catheter cuff extrusion is a frequent phenomenon. Catheter-related bloodstream infection, hypertension, and age of 61 to 95 years are high-risk factors for multiple episodes of cuff extrusion.
RESUMO
CONTEXT: The symptoms associated with the excessive fluid accumulation of ascites or pleural effusions can be intractable to medical management and can have a significant negative impact on quality of life of hospice patients. Hospice of the Valley, a community-based, nonprofit hospice agency has historically referred patients to outpatient providers for paracentesis, thoracentesis, and placement of tunneled drainage catheters. OBJECTIVES: To describe an in-house pilot program of tunneled catheter placement to provide immediate and longer-term symptom relief for selected hospice patients. METHODS: The logistics and cost of the pilot program are described. Key data elements, including select demographics, patient eligibility screening, and incidence of procedure-related or late complications are reported. RESULTS: A total of 135 drainage procedures completed on 127 unique hospice patients over 27 months (2020-2023) were reviewed. The rate of procedure-related complications (<4%) and late complications (<3%) are low. The average cost per procedure ($1030) compares favorably with outpatient providers' fees. The program was well-accepted by the interdisciplinary hospice team, patients, and families. CONCLUSIONS: An in-house program of tunneled catheter placement is a feasible option for hospice providers with low-cost exposure and high potential for improved quality of life and symptom relief for selected patients.
Assuntos
Hospitais para Doentes Terminais , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Paracentese/métodos , Drenagem/métodos , CatéteresRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The use of a tunneled catheter as the primary vascular access among old hemodialysis patients is frequent. Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) is a common complication, associated with increased mortality. Data regarding the clinical presentation and outcomes of CRBSI among old hemodialysis patients is limited. METHODS: All chronic hemodialysis patients hospitalized between 2010 and 2022 with CRBSI were included. Patients were classified into two groups: old adults (≥ 75) and younger patients. Clinical, microbiological, and outcome data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-four patients with CRBSI were identified. Fifty-seven were aged ≥ 75 years. Mean age in the older and younger groups was 81.2 ± 5 and 59.7 ± 12.7, respectively. Male gender was predominant (64%). Charlson comorbidity score and Pitt bacteremia score were comparable among both groups. Norton score < 14 was more common among old persons (n = 24, 67% versus n = 21, 31%, p < 0.001), as well as nursing-home residence. Gram-negative pathogens and Staphylococcus aureus were common in both groups. The frequency of inappropriate empirical antimicrobial treatment was higher among older persons. Overall, in-hospital and 90-day mortality was high (age ≥ 75, 36.8%, age < 75, 24.7%, p = 0.14). Age was not significantly associated with mortality after adjustment for low Norton score, residence, and inappropriate antimicrobial therapy as well as resistance patterns of bloodstream isolates [OR = 1.2 (95% CI 0.4-3.3), p = 0.76]. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical characteristics and outcomes of CRBSI were comparable among old and young hemodialysis patients. However, the high mortality rate in this cohort suggests that the use of tunneled catheters as a permanent vascular access should be discouraged in both patient groups.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Bacteriemia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The implant of tunneled catheters, may be associated with some complications such as bleeding after insertion. We aimed this study to present a modified method for catheter insertion to prevent bleeding after the procedure. METHOD: The study included the analysis of retrospective results of 5339 tunneled catheter insertion procedures in our center, 5005 of which were performed using the standard method, and in 334 cases, the modified technique was applied. RESULTS: Applying a two-mattress suture was a safe and easy to apply and useful method for tunneled catheter insertion in our center. We reported only one bleeding around the catheter entry site with this modified technique of tunneled catheter removal. While the standard and routine technique was associated with 39 cases of bleeding. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In our practice, the two-mattress suture procedure is the simplest and best method of central venous catheter insertion in hemodialysis patients and it is associated with less bleeding around the catheter entry site, so, it can be applied over the world.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Infection is the second leading cause of death in dialysis patients, with catheter-related bloodstream infection being the most serious. Exit Site Infection and Tunnel Infection are also related to the catheter. OBJECTIVE: To compare the infection rates achieved with the application of either topical gentamicin or placebo to the exit-site of tunneled catheters filled with locking solution in chronic hemodialysis patients. METHODS: This randomized double-blind clinical trial compared the application of 0.1% gentamicin versus placebo to the exit site of tunneled hemodialysis catheters filled with a prophylactic locking solution. A total of 91 patients were randomly allocated to 2 groups: placebo or 0.1% gentamicin. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 60.4 (+ 15.3) years, with predominance of males (60.4%). The main cause of chronic kidney disease was diabetes (40.7%). The rates of exit site infection (placebo = 30% vs. gentamicin = 34.1%, p = 0.821), and bloodstream infection (placebo = 22% vs. gentamicin = 17.1%, p = 0.60), as well as both exit site infection and bloodstream infection incidence density per 1000 catheter-days (p = 1) did not differ between groups. The infection-free curve was also similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: The application of topical 0.1% gentamicin to the exit site of tunneled catheters filled with lock solution did not reduce infectious complications when compared to topical placebo in patients on chronic hemodialysis.
Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Sepse , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Feminino , Gentamicinas/uso terapêutico , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/etiologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Sepse/complicações , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversosRESUMO
The fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) is a regional anesthetic technique for hip and femoral surgery that blocks the femoral, obturator, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves. We report the case of a middle-aged female patient who presented with excruciating left lower extremity pain secondary to metastatic left femur osteosarcoma. A FICB with the tunneled catheter was sterilely placed in the operating room as palliative therapy due to the difficulty in pain control, as the patient experienced severe somnolence with high-dose opioid therapy. Conventional techniques such as a femoral nerve block were also precluded due to difficult anatomy secondary to tumor compression. Near-total pain relief was achieved postoperatively and lasted over seven weeks until discharge. This case report demonstrates the unique use of the FICB as a primary pain management technique for the control of chronic lower extremity cancer pain.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The objective of this case is to report an endovascular occlusion of an acquired vascular fistula using an Amplatzer Vascular Plug II. Also, it is to review the available literature on risk factors, pathophysiology, and related management strategies about complications of the tunneled central venous catheter (TCVC). CASE REPORT: The case was a 40-year-old man with a chronic kidney disease (CKD) on dialysis and with a history of several previous TCVC placements, along with recurrent infections. The last TCVC developed a fistula between the superior vena cava and the right pulmonary artery, shown by computed tomography (CT). We decided to remove a long-term TCVC and occluded the fistula applying an endovascular embolic device, an Amplatzer Vascular Plug II, subsequently. The patient was given parenteral treatment during 10 days of hospitalization. Over 9 months of follow-up, the device was appropriately positioned and did not obstruct the vascular flow. CONCLUSION: Tunneled central venous catheters are frequently used for hemodialysis in patients in the last stage of CKD who do not have an arteriovenous fistula. Occasionally, delayed complications such as adherence or catheter migration occur. This case illustrates an endovascular treatment with excellent results and low risk of morbidity and mortality. CLINICAL IMPACT: The purpose of this work is to present an endovascular occlusion by means of an Amplatzer® Vascular Plug II in a residual fistula. The endovascular way is decided in situations, for instance, once the cardiothoracic surgeons argue that the patient is not in general conditions to tolerate surgery, the surgical procedure would be complex, or, in a surgical approach with a difficult-to-resolve hemorrhage. We explain the technique and the materials we used for an excellent result and a low risk of complications. This case is intended to serve as an aid in the treatment of similar events.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Different techniques of guidewire exchange of tunneled catheters for hemodialysis (HD) have been reported. This study was carried out to assess the feasibility of a new procedure in chronic HD patients who needed catheter exchange because of mechanical dysfunction. METHODS: The guidewire exchange method was based on the creation of a new exit site and a new subcutaneous tunnel while using the same venous insertion site. This was a retrospective study of exchanged tunneled catheters because of mechanical complications in patients on chronic HD between June 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. The feasibility of the procedure was defined by successful exchange and catheter patency at 6 months. Catheter survival and immediate complications were reported. RESULTS: A total of 49 procedures were performed in 34 HD patients. There was no catheter insertion failure. At 6 months, 6 catheters have lost their patency because of a mechanical complication. Thus, the success rate of the procedure was 43/49 (87.8%). Catheter survival censored on death, transplantation, or vascular access creation was 97.8% at 90 days, 86.2% at 180 days, and 74.5% at 1 year. The median catheter survival was 10.2 months. Among the 49 procedures, there were 9 hematomas at the insertion site that did not require surgical intervention. Discussion/Conlusion: Our study shows that guidewire exchange of a tunneled HD catheter by creating a new exit site and a new subcutaneous tunnel by using the same venous access is a newer method in chronic HD patients. This procedure should not be used in patients with coagulation issues. Additional studies are needed to compare the different methods of HD catheter exchange.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Humanos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Projetos Piloto , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tunneled central venous catheters (CVC) are crucial in the management of children affected by short bowel syndrome (SBS). This work aims to investigate the outcomes of tunneled CVC and to identify factors influencing their survival. METHODS: All the children diagnosed with SBS and undergone a procedure of insertion of a tunneled CVC from 2010 to 2019 were included. Demographic data and surgical information about the procedures were collected. Regression models and Kaplan-Meier analysis were performed to estimate the survival. RESULTS: Eighteen patients, eight males (44%), with a median length of residual bowel measuring 72 cm (IQR 50-102 cm), were enrolled. Thirty-nine Broviac CVCs were inserted with a mean number of 2.2 CVCs per patient and 13365 line-days. The overall incidence of complications was 3.2/1000 line-days, and the incidence of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) was 1.1/1000 line-days. No episode of catheter thrombosis was reported. The median survival was 269 days (IQR 82-1814 days). The survival was negatively influenced by a younger age at insertion (R2 = 0.29; p < 0.001), 2.7 Fr diameter (median survival 76 days; p < 0.001) and the occurrence of complications (median survival 169 days; p = 0.002). The length of residual bowel was a mild risk factor for anticipated removal (OR 1.1; CI95 1.0-1.1; p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: CVC-related complications negatively influenced the survival of the line. An elder age at insertion together with a larger CVC diameter increased the survival of the line, while a shorter residual bowel was associated with an anticipated removal due to complications.
Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Síndrome do Intestino Curto , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/diagnóstico , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Síndrome do Intestino Curto/complicações , Silício , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
Achieving the ideal exit site is the new philosophy for complicated vascular access patients. Recent publications have described multiple venous access solutions such as tunneling to the scapular region, the chest to the arm, and from the femoral vein to the abdominal and patellar region. In the patients afflicted with delirium, dementia, or confusion even these sites may not be sufficient. The following case study illustrates a triple tunneled femoral catheter on a non-cooperative patient with inoperable endocarditis to be discharged and treated with long term antibiotics.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Demência , Humanos , Cateteres de Demora , Diálise Renal , Veia Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Central vein catheter is a convenient and preferred vascular access for blood purification therapy in intensive care unit. Utilizing ultrasound to access the central vein is considered standard of care. However, critically ill patients can pose challenges while acquiring an optimal ultrasound image. The presence of subcutaneous air pockets, concerns for air embolism, and excessive bleeding from the exit site is one such clinical situation. We describe our experience with a unique situation while placing a tunneled dialysis catheter in a COVID-19 patient with acute respiratory failure and subcutaneous emphysema.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Enfisema Subcutâneo , Humanos , Diálise Renal , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Cateteres de Demora , Enfisema Subcutâneo/diagnóstico por imagem , Enfisema Subcutâneo/etiologia , Enfisema Subcutâneo/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tunneled catheter-related bacteremia represents one of the major complications in patients on hemodialysis, and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of tunneled catheter-related bacteremia and, secondly, to identify possible factors involved in the first episode of bacteremia. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of all tunneled catheters inserted between 1 January, 2005 and 31 December, 2019. Data on patients with a tunneled catheter were analyzed for comorbidities, catheter characteristics, microbiological culture results and variables related to the first episode of bacteremia. Patient outcomes were also assessed. RESULTS: In the 14-year period under study, 406 tunneled catheters were implanted in 325 patients. A total of 85 cases of tunneled catheter-related bacteremia were diagnosed, resulting in an incidence of 0.40 per 1000 catheter days (81.1% after 6 months of implantation). The predominant microorganisms isolated were Gram-positive organisms: Staphylococcus epidermidis (48.4%); Staphylococcus aureus (28.0%). We found no significant differences in time to catheter removal for infections or non-infection-related reasons. The jugular vein, the Palindrome® catheter, and being the first vascular access were protective factors for the first episode of bacteremia. The 30-day mortality rate from the first tunneled catheter-related bacteremia was 8.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of bacteremia in our study was low and did not seem to have a relevant impact on catheter survival. S. epidermidis was the most frequently isolated microorganism, followed by S. aureus. We identified Palindrome® catheter, jugular vein, and being the first vascular access as significant protective factors against tunneled catheter-related bacteremia.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Humanos , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Cateteres de Demora/microbiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Incidência , Staphylococcus aureus , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/etiologiaRESUMO
Rationale: Pyoderma gangrenosum is a rare neutrophilic dermatosis. Misdiagnosis of pyoderma gangrenosum as an infection is not uncommon. Pyoderma gangrenosum can be associated with Koebner phenomenon and rarely results in systemic inflammatory response syndrome and shock. Presenting concerns of the patient: A 61-year-old woman had recently started maintenance hemodialysis, using a tunneled catheter. She was admitted with fever and signs of inflammation at the catheter exit site and along the tunnel. Diagnoses: The initial diagnosis was catheter-related tunnel infection. The exit site broke down into a 5 cm × 5 cm lesion typical of pyoderma, and a new similar lesion developed at a subcutaneous injection site in her abdomen. Clinical diagnosis of pyoderma gangrenosum was made. She remained febrile despite broad antibiotic coverage and catheter removal and developed systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) that necessitated transfer to intensive care unit. Interventions: She responded well to fluids and intravenous steroids. Viral and bacterial cultures were negative throughout; echocardiography and computed tomography were unrevealing. Insertion of a new hemodialysis catheter was deferred as long as clinically possible, was undertaken while the patient was taking steroids, and was uncomplicated. Outcomes: She remained hemodynamically stable and was discharged after rehabilitation. Her wounds slowly granulated and healed. Steroids were tapered. Teaching points: To our knowledge, this is the first case report of a patient with pyoderma gangrenosum developing at the site of tunneled hemodialysis catheter. Our patient developed SIRS with no evidence of infection. We summarize 11 previous case reports of pyoderma leading to SIRS and responsive to steroids.
Justification: Le pyoderma gangrenosum est une dermatose neutrophile rare que l'on méprend souvent d'abord pour une infection. Cette affection qui peut être associée au phénomène de Koebner entraîne rarement un syndrome de réponse inflammatoire systémique (SRIS) et un choc. Présentation du cas: Une femme de 61 ans qui avait récemment amorcé un traitement d'hémodialyse d'entretien par cathéter tunnelisé. À l'admission, la patiente présentait de la fièvre et des signes d'inflammation au point d'émergence du cathéter et le long du tunnel. Diagnostic: On a d'abord diagnostiqué une infection du tunnel liée au cathéter. Le point d'émergence s'est étendu en une lésion de 5 cm x 5 cm typique du pyoderma et une nouvelle lésion similaire s'est développée sur l'abdomen à un point d'injection sous-cutanée. Un diagnostic clinique de pyoderma gangrenosum a été établi. La fièvre a persisté malgré une antibiothérapie étendue et le retrait du cathéter; la patiente a développé un SRIS qui a nécessité son transfert à l'unité des soins intensifs. Intervention: La patiente a bien répondu à l'administration de liquides et de stéroïdes par voie intraveineuse. Les cultures virales et bactériennes sont demeurées négatives tout au long; l'échocardiographie et la tomodensitométrie étaient non révélatrices. L'insertion d'un nouveau cathéter d'hémodialyse a été reportée aussi longtemps que le permettait l'état clinique de la patiente. La réinsertion a été entreprise alors que la patiente était sous stéroïdes et elle n'a pas entraîné de complications. Résultats: La patiente est restée hémodynamiquement stable et a obtenu son congé après la réinsertion. Les plaies ont granulé et guéri lentement. Les stéroïdes ont été réduits progressivement. Enseignements tirés: À notre connaissance, il s'agit du premier cas rapporté d'une patiente atteinte de pyoderma gangrenosum développé au point d'émergence d'un cathéter d'hémodialyse tunnelisé. Notre patiente a développé un SRIS sans signe d'infection. Nous résumons 11 cas précédents de pyoderma ayant entraîné un SRIS et ayant répondu aux stéroïdes.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis tunneled catheters are prone to failure due to infection or thrombosis. Prediction of catheter dysfunction chance and finding the predisposing risk factors might help clinicians to prolong proper catheter function. The multidimensional mechanism of failures following infection or thrombosis needs a multivariable and comprehensive analytic approach. METHODS: A longitudinal cross-sectional study was implemented on 1048 patients admitted for the first hemodialysis tunneled catheterization attempt between 2013 and 2019 in Shahid Hasheminejdad hospital, Tehran, Iran. Patients' information was extracted from digital and also paper records. Based on their criteria, single and multiple variable analyses were done separately in patients with catheter dysfunction due to thrombosis and infection. T-test and Chi-square test were performed in quantitative and categorical variables, respectively. Competing risk regression was performed under the assumption of proportionality for infection and thrombosis, and the sub-distributional hazard ratios (SHR) were calculated. All statistical inferences were made with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-six patients were enrolled in the analysis based on study criteria. Samples' mean (SD) age was 54(15.54), and 322 (69.1%) patients were female. Three hundred sixty-five catheter dysfunction cases were observed due to thrombosis 123(26.4%) and infection 242(52%). The Median (range) time to catheter dysfunction event was 243(36-1131) days. Single variable analysis showed a statistically significant higher proportion of thrombosis in females (OR = 2.66, 95% CI: 1.77-4.00) and younger patients, respectively. Multivariate competing risk regression showed a statistically significant higher risk of thrombosis in females (Sub-distributional hazard (SHR) = 1.81), hypertensive (SHR = 1.82), and more obese patients (BMI SHR = 1.037). A higher risk of infection was calculated in younger (Age SHR = 0.98) and diabetic (SHR = 1.63) patients using the same method. CONCLUSION: Female and hypertensive patients are considerably at higher risk of catheter thrombosis, whereas diabetes is the most critical risk factor for infectious catheter dysfunction. Competing risk regression analysis showed a comprehensive result in the assessment of risk factors of catheter dysfunction.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Trombose , Cateterismo/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Irã (Geográfico)/epidemiologia , Masculino , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Trombose/epidemiologia , Trombose/etiologiaRESUMO
Introduction: Tunneled femoral vein hemodialysis catheters are used when all other options for permanent vascular access or jugular central vein catheter are exhausted. There is little published literature on the outcome and survival of tunneled femoral vein catheters. Methods: Using a retrospective database, we identified all tunneled femoral dialysis catheters placed in the Nephrology department of our institute over a one-and-half year period. The outcomes, complications, and patency of these procedures was retrospectively evaluated. Results: Out of total 21 patients, 14 were female and 7 males with a mean age of 45 (range 17-73 years) and about one-fourth had diabetes mellitus (26%). Right-sided femoral catheter insertion was performed in 18 patients (85.7%) and 3 patients underwent left-sided insertion. Technical success of placement was 100% with no immediate complications. Median follow up period was 24 days. Primary catheter patency at 30, 60, 90, and 180 days were 81, 29, 18, and 12.5%, respectively. Three patients (15.7%) developed catheter-related deep venous thrombosis. Three catheters (14.2%) were removed for catheter-related infection and seven (33.3%) were removed because of absent blood flow. Conclusion: Our experience with tunneled femoral catheters revealed low catheter survival and significant complications (deep venous thrombosis and malfunction/occlusion).
RESUMO
Background: Central vein stenosis (CVS) is a common complication in hemodialysis patients following tunneled central venous catheter (CVC) insertion. Little is known about its incidence, association with patient characteristics, or relationship with duration of CVC placement. We systematically evaluated central vein stenosis in hemodialysis patients receiving their first CVC exchange at a large medical center. Methods: All new hemodialysis patients underwent an ultrasound before their internal jugular tunneled CVC placement, to exclude venous stenosis or thrombosis. After the initial CVC insertion, if the patients were referred for CVC exchange due to dysfunction, a catheterogram/venogram was performed to assess for hemodynamically significant (≥50%) central vein stenosis. During a 5-year period (January 2016 to January 2021), we quantified the incidence of CVS in patients undergoing CVC exchange. We also evaluated the association of central vein stenosis with patient demographics, comorbidities, and duration of CVC dependence before exchange. Results: During the study period, 273 patients underwent exchange of a tunneled internal jugular vein CVC preceded by a catheterogram/venogram. Hemodynamically significant CVS was observed in 36 patients (13%). CVS was not associated with patient age, sex, race, diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, or CVC laterality. However, the frequency of CVS was associated with the duration of CVC dependence (26% versus 11% for CVC duration ≥6 versus <6 months: odds ratio (95% CI), 3.17 (1.45 to 6.97), P=0.003). Conclusions: Among incident hemodialysis patients receiving their first tunneled internal jugular CVC exchange, the overall incidence of de novo hemodynamically significant central vein stenosis was 13%. The likelihood of CVS was substantially greater in patients with at least 6 months of CVC dependence.