Effect of preoperative autologous platelet-rich plasmapheresis on postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing heart valve surgery.

Background: Cardiovascular surgeries often require deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), which can disrupt blood clotting and lead to excessive bleeding. Traditional treatments involve transfusing blood and blood products, which can have adverse effects and place significant strain on the global blood supply. Research suggests that autologous platelet-rich plasmapheresis (aPRP) may reduce the need for transfusions by preserving blood components. However, the impact of aPRP on postoperative blood loss and clinical outcomes in cardiovascular surgery remains controversial. This study aimed to examine the effects of aPRP on postoperative blood loss and recovery in patients undergoing heart valve surgery. Methods: A total of 183 patients were divided into either aPRP or control groups. The aPRP group received aPRP before CPB, whereas the control group did not. The primary endpoint was postoperative bleeding between the groups. The secondary endpoints were postoperative bleeding risk factors and clinical outcome assessment. Logistic regression analysis with covariate adjustment was used to calculate these risk factors. Results: A total of 76 patients (41.5%) in the aPRP group and 107 patients (58.5%) in the control group were included in the analysis. No significant difference was found in the occurrence of postoperative bleeding [odds ratio (OR) =0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.28-1.00, P=0.05], and the aPRP group had fewer complications than the controls (OR =0.28, 95% CI: 0.10-0.68, P=0.009). However, after adjusting for the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, diabetes, arrhythmology, mean activated clotting time (ACTmean), CPB, bleeding, thoracotomy, and body mass index (BMI), there was a significant difference in postoperative bleeding (adjusted OR =0.47, 95% CI: 0.22-0.98, P=0.04) and complications (adjusted OR =0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.64, P=0.008) between the two groups. Conclusions: Preoperative aPRP can improve postoperative outcomes and reduce complications in patients undergoing heart valve surgery.

Application of model for end-stage liver disease as disease classification in cardiac valve surgery: a retrospective study based on the INSPIRE database.

Background: Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) is an effective predictive marker for renal, hepatic, and cardiac dysfunctions. In this study, we explore the correlation between MELD scores and the outcomes of patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from patients who underwent cardiac valve surgery, encompassing procedures on the aortic valve, mitral valve, and tricuspid valve, using the Informative Surgical Patient dataset for Innovative Research Environment (INSPIRE) database, we conducted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses on the study participants and chose MELD as the primary scoring tool for our study due to its optimal area under the curve (AUC), patients were stratified into high (MELD ≥18) and low (MELD <18) groups based on the determined cutoff value. The perioperative clinical data of the two groups were compared. Results: The analysis revealed 751 patients in the low MELD group (75.5%) and 244 patients (24.5%) in the high MELD group. Patients in the high MELD group exhibited a lower body mass index (BMI) compared to those in the low MELD group. In comparison to the low MELD group, the high MELD group exhibited a higher rate of emergency surgery (10.66% vs. 5.99%, P=0.01), along with prolonged anesthesia time, surgery time, and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time. Regarding clinical prognosis, the high MELD group demonstrated a higher 28-day mortality rate (10.66% vs. 0.8%, P<0.001), as also observed in the analysis of three valve subgroups. Additionally, the high MELD group experienced longer hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and a higher proportion of patients requiring mechanical circulatory support, including intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) assist (14.75% vs. 3.86%, P<0.001), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) assist (7.38% vs. 0.8%, P<0.001), and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (27.87% vs. 1.46%, P<0.001) post-surgery. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves illustrated a significantly lower mortality rate in the low MELD group compared to the high MELD group, with highly significant statistical differences (P<0.001). Conclusions: The MELD score demonstrates a robust predictive value for clinical outcomes following cardiac valve surgery, underscoring its utility as a viable metric for disease stratification research.

Periannular Mitral Valve Prosthesis Crypts Mimicking Periprosthetic Abscesses.

Mitral annular abscesses are rare and can be caused by infective endocarditis. We present the case of a patient with an infected mitral prosthesis, with multiple suspected periprosthetic abscesses. However, perioperative inspection showed a supra-annular implanted prosthesis.

Case Series of First Microinvasive Fully Endoscopic Use of a New Mitral Prosthesis.

The use of bioprostheses is increasing in younger patients, but it is associated with the risk of later valve deterioration, especially in the mitral position. A new bioprosthesis for mitral valve replacement offers possible longer-term durability and improved hemodynamics. Objectives: Here, we report the implantation of the novel Edwards MITRIS RESILIA mitral valve (Edwards Lifesciences Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) through microinvasive fully endoscopic access as an innovative surgical approach based on a series of twelve patients. Methods: Contrast-based ECG gated CT was preoperatively performed in all patients to determine the intravascular calcifications and vascular parameters, as well as to assess noticeable problems during the operation. CT software for cardiac interventions (3Mensio Medical Imaging BV) was used to simulate surgical prostheses digitally inside the native annulus. With this, a digital LVOT and neo LVOT was created, and the difference between the valve prostheses was measured. Implantation of the MITRIS RESILIA valve was performed in 12 patients according to the instructions for use through microinvasive access in a fully endoscopic fashion using 3D visualization. Results: The mean patient age was 56.50 years, and 7/12 (58.33%) were redo procedures. All patients survived the first 30 days after the procedure, the mean aortic cross-clamp time was 40.17 ± 13.72 min. and mean postoperative transvalvular gradient was 4.45 ± 1.74 mmHg. The neo LVOT in the CT-based simulation was measured with an average area of 414.98 ± 88.69 mm2. The average difference between the LVOT and neo LVOT area was 65.35 ± 34.99 mm2. There was no case of paravalvular leakage or obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract. Conclusions: The novel MITRIS RESILIA valve is a promising new bioprosthesis for mitral valve replacement that offers improved features as compared to other prostheses. The ease of implantation is increased by this prosthesis by the improved pliability of the sewing cuff and the inward folding of the struts, which was confirmed by short operative times in our series.

Beyond the Valve: Incidence, Outcomes, and Modifiable Factors of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Infective Endocarditis Undergoing Valve Surgery-A Retrospective, Single-Center Study.

Background/Objectives: Infective endocarditis (IE) often requires surgical intervention, with postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), posing a significant concern. This retrospective study aimed to investigate AKI incidence, its impact on short-term mortality, and identify modifiable factors in patients with IE scheduled for valve surgery. Methods: This single-center study enrolled 130 consecutive IE patients from 2013 to 2021 undergoing valve surgery. The creatinine levels were monitored pre- and postoperatively, and AKI was defined by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. Patient demographics, comorbidities, procedural details, and complications were recorded. Primary outcomes included AKI incidence; the relevance of creatinine levels for AKI detection; and the association of AKI with 30-, 60-, and 180-day mortality. Modifiable factors contributing to AKI were explored as secondary outcomes. Results: Postoperatively, 35.4% developed AKI. The highest creatinine elevation occurred on the second postoperative day. Best predictive value for AKI was a creatinine level of 1.35 mg/dL on the second day (AUC: 0.901; sensitivity: 0.89, specificity: 0.79). Elevated creatinine levels on the second day were robust predictors for short-term mortality at 30, 60, and 180 days postoperatively (AUC ranging from 0.708 to 0.789). CK-MB levels at 24 h postoperatively and minimum hemoglobin during surgery were identified as independent predictors for AKI in logistic regression. Conclusions: This study highlights the crucial role of creatinine levels in predicting short-term mortality in surgical IE patients. A specific threshold (1.35 mg/dL) provides a practical marker for risk stratification, offering insights for refining perioperative strategies and optimizing outcomes in this challenging patient population.

Outcomes following heart valve surgery in patients with infective endocarditis and preoperative septic cerebral embolism: insights from the CAMPAIGN study group.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to analyse the impact of preoperative septic cerebral embolism on early and late postoperative outcomes in patients with infective endocarditis undergoing valve surgery. METHODS: Retrospective multicentric study based on the Clinical Multicentric Project for Analysis of Infective Endocarditis in Germany (CAMPAIGN) registry comprising patients with infective endocarditis who underwent valve surgery between 1994 and 2018 at 6 German centres. Patients were divided into 2 groups for statistical comparison according to the presence or absence of preoperative septic cerebral embolism. Propensity score matching was performed for adjusted comparisons of postoperative outcomes. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and estimated 5-year survival. RESULTS: A total of 4917 patients were included in the analysis, 3909 (79.5%) patients without and 1008 (20.5%) patients with preoperative septic cerebral embolism. Patients with preoperative septic cerebral embolism had more baseline comorbidities. Mitral valve endocarditis (44.1% vs 33.0% P < 0.001), large vegetations >10 mm (43.1% vs 30.0%, P < 0.001), and Staphylococcus species infection (42.3% vs 21.3%, P < 0.001) were more frequent in the cerebral embolism group. Among patients with preoperative cerebral embolism, 286 (28.4%) patients had no stroke signs (silent stroke). After matching (1008 matched pairs), there was no statistically significant difference in 30-day mortality (20.1% vs 22.8%; P = 0.14) and 5-year survival (47.8% vs 49.1%; stratified log-rank P = 0.77) in patients with and without preoperative cerebral embolism, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative septic cerebral embolism in patients with infective endocarditis requiring valve surgery does not negatively affect early or late mortality; therefore, it should not play a major role in deciding if surgery is to be performed.

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Intraoperative Leadless Pacemaker Implantation During Valve Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative implantation of leadless cardiac pacemakers (LCPs) under direct visualization during cardiac surgery is a novel strategy to provide pacing to patients with an elevated risk of postoperative conduction disorders or with a preexisting pacing indication undergoing valve surgery. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of intraoperative LCP implantation in 100 consecutive patients. METHODS: Retrospective single-center cohort study of consecutive patients (n = 100) who underwent intraoperative LCP implantation during valve surgery. Safety and efficacy were assessed at implantation and follow-up visits. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients (age 68 ± 13 years, 47% female) underwent intraoperative LCP implantation. The surgery involved the tricuspid valve in 99 patients (99%), including tricuspid valve repair in 59 (59%) and tricuspid valve replacement in 40 (40%). Most of the patients (78%) underwent multivalve surgery. The indication for LCP implantation was elevated risk of postoperative atrioventricular block in 54% and preexisting bradyarrhythmias in 46%. LCP implantation was successful in all patients. During a median of 10.6 months (IQR: 2.0-22.7 months) of follow-up, no device-related complications occurred. At 12-month follow-up, the pacing thresholds were acceptable (≤2.0 V at 0.24 milliseconds) in 95% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative LCP implantation under direct visualization is a safe strategy to provide permanent pacing in patients undergoing valve surgery, with a postoperative electrical performance comparable to percutaneously placed LCPs.

Single-center real-world data and technical considerations from 100 consecutive patients treated with the Perceval aortic bioprosthesis.

Objectives: Although the Perceval sutureless aortic valve bioprosthesis presents a feasible alternative to conventional aortic valve prostheses, the extent of its applicability with respect to technical considerations for a real-world patient collective is still under debate. Methods: One hundred patients received the Perceval prosthesis [males: 59; age: 72.5 (7.3-79) years] between December 2015 and February 2023 [EuroSCORE II: 2.8 (1.7-5.4)] for an aortic valve replacement (AVR), with additional concomitant procedures, for underlying severe aortic valve stenosis [n = 93 (93)], endocarditis [n = 5 (5)], and redo AVR [n = 7 (7)] including a prior surgical AVR [n = 4 (4)] and a failed transcatheter aortic valve implantation [n = 3 (3)]. Surgery was conducted primarily by median sternotomy [n = 71 (71)] and, alternatively, by the upper hemisternotomy approach [n = 29 (29)]. Results: Over a median follow-up time of 36.5 (16.5-53) months, eight patients (8%) underwent postoperative pacemaker implantation, with five (5%) due to high-grade atrioventricular block, while nine patients experienced a stroke (9%). The median values of maximum and mean gradients across all valve sizes were 22 (18-27.5) mmHg and 10 (13-18) mmHg, respectively. Two patients (2%) had moderate and one (1%) had severe paravalvular leakage, with the latter presenting the only case of underlying valve migration and induced redo AVR with valve explantation 2 days following initial surgery. Thirty-day mortality (and overall mortality) was 5% and 26%, respectively. Conclusion: The implantation of the Perceval bioprosthesis is feasible for a variety of indications, with excellent hemodynamic results and low complication rates in a real-world high-risk patient collective.

Crossroads of Care: Navigating Injection Drug Use-Associated Endocarditis.

Infective endocarditis (IE), with its high morbidity and mortality, is a frequent complication of injection drug use (IDU). We present a case highlighting the complexities in the management of IDU-associated IE (IDU-IE) in a 46-year-old male with active IDU who presented with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia and a large tricuspid valve vegetation. Urgent tricuspid valve surgery was indicated due to the size of the vegetation measuring up to 4 cm, along with recurrent pulmonary septic emboli. The patient underwent an uncomplicated and successful complete vegetectomy, tricuspid valve repair, and completed a 42-day antibiotic course. During the six-week follow-up, he showed complete recovery and maintained successful abstinence from illicit drug use, supported by an addiction medicine specialist. This case underscores the importance of early recognition, appropriate antibiotic therapy, and individualized surgical intervention in optimizing outcomes. Effective management of IE necessitates a multidisciplinary IE team, including addiction medicine specialists. Addressing the underlying substance use disorder (SUD) is crucial to reducing the risk of recurrent IE.

Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR) in Patients With Sarcoidosis.

Introduction Data regarding clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with sarcoidosis is lacking. This study aims to clarify the clinical outcomes of TAVR vs SAVR in patients with sarcoidosis. Methods Data was collected from the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016-2019 using validated ICD-10-CM codes for sarcoidosis, TAVR, and SAVR. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those who underwent TAVR and those who underwent SAVR. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's chi-squared test to determine clinical outcomes of TAVR vs SAVR in patients with sarcoidosis. Results The prevalence of sarcoidosis was 0.23% among total study patients (n=142,420,378). After exclusions, the prevalence of TAVR was 650 (49%) and SAVR was 675 (51%) in patients with sarcoidosis. Patients who underwent TAVR were on average older (74 vs 65 years old, p=0.001), and more likely to be female (57 vs 40%, p<0.001) compared to patients who underwent SAVR. The TAVR cohort had higher rates of congestive heart failure (CHF) (77.7 vs 42.2%, p=0.001), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (42.3 vs 24.4% p=0.001), anemia (5.4 vs 2.2%, p=0.004), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (1.5 vs 0%, p=0.004), and hypothyroidism (31.5 vs 16.3%, p=0.001) compared to the SAVR cohort. Inpatient mortality post-procedure was higher in the SAVR cohort compared to the TAVR cohort (15 vs 0, p=0.001). Regarding post-procedure complications, respiratory complications were more common in the SAVR cohort (4.4 vs 0%, p=0.001), while TAVR was associated with a higher incidence of permanent pacemaker (PPM) insertion (2.15 vs 0.8%, p=0.001). There was no statistical difference in the development of acute kidney injury (AKI) (0.8 vs 1.5%, p=0.33), AKI requiring hemodialysis (0 vs. 0.7%, p=0.08), or stroke (0.8 vs 0.7, p=1) post-procedure between the two cohorts. Conclusion This study found that in the sarcoidosis population, TAVR was associated with reduced mortality, shorter hospital length of stay, and lower hospitalization costs in comparison to SAVR.

Age-Specific Outcomes of Bioprosthetic vs. Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement: Balancing Reoperation Risk with Anticoagulation Burden.

BACKGROUND: The choice of prosthesis for aortic valve replacement (AVR) remains challenging. The risk of anticoagulation complications vs. the risk of aortic valve reintervention should be weighed. This study compared the outcomes of bioprosthetic vs. mechanical AVR in patients older and younger than 50. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted from 2009 to 2019 and involved 292 adult patients who underwent isolated AVR. The patients were divided according to their age (above 50 years or 50 years and younger) and the type of valves used in each age group. The outcomes of bioprosthetic valves (Groups 1a (>50 years) and 1b (≤50 years)) were compared with those of mechanical valves (Groups 2a (>50 years) and 2b (≤50 years)) in each age group. RESULTS: The groups had nearly equal rates of preexisting comorbidities except for Group 1b, in which the rate of hypertension was greater (32.6% vs. 14.7%; p = 0.025). This group also had higher rates of old stroke (8.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.011) and higher creatinine clearance (127.62 (108.82-150.23) vs. 110.02 (84.87-144.49) mL/min; p = 0.026) than Group 1b. Patients in Group 1a were significantly older than Group 2a (64 (58-71) vs. 58 (54-67) years; p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the NYHA class between the groups. The preoperative ejection fraction and other echocardiographic parameters did not differ significantly between the groups. Re-exploration for bleeding was more common in patients older than 50 years who underwent mechanical valve replacement (p = 0.021). There was no difference in other postoperative complications between the groups. The groups had no differences in survival, stroke, or bleeding rates. Aortic valve reintervention was significantly greater in patients ≤ 50 years old with bioprosthetic valves. There were no differences between groups in the changes in left ventricular mass, ejection fraction, or peak aortic valve pressure during the 5-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of mechanical and bioprosthetic valve replacement were comparable in patients older than 50 years. Using bioprosthetic valves in patients younger than 50 years was associated with a greater rate of valve reintervention, with no beneficial effect on the risk of bleeding or stroke.

Impact of Pleural Integrity Preservation After Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: While the benefits of minimally invasive aortic valve surgery compared with standard sternotomy have been widely described, the impact of preservation of pleural integrity (PPI) in minimally invasive surgery is still widely discussed. This study aims to define the role of PPI on postoperative and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR). METHODS: All 2,430 consecutive patients undergoing MIAVR (ministernotomy or right anterior minithoracotomy) between 1997 and 2022 were included in the study. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with and without PPI. PPI was considered the maintenance of the pleura closed without the need for a chest tube insertion at the end of the surgical procedure. A propensity-matched analysis was used to compare the PPI and not-PPI groups. RESULTS: After propensity matching, 848 patients were included in each group (PPI and not-PPI). The mean age was 70.21 versus 71.42 years, and the mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality was 0.31% versus 0.30% in not-PPI versus PPI, respectively. The mean follow-up time was 147.4 months. Postoperatively, not-PPI versus PPI patients had a longer intensive care unit stay (9.7 vs 17.3 h, P < 0.001) and hospital length of stay (5.2 vs 8.9 days, P < 0.001). The rate of respiratory complications including the incidence of pneumothorax or subcutaneous emphysema, pulmonary atelectasis, and pleural effusion events requiring thoracentesis/drainage was significantly higher in not-PPI versus PPI. The 30-day all-cause mortality was higher in not-PPI versus PPI (0.029 vs 0.010, P = 0.003). Perioperative, short-term, and long-term all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the not-PPI group. CONCLUSIONS: PPI after MIAVR is associated with reduced incidence of postoperative complications, reduced lengths of stay, and improved overall survival compared with not-PPI. Therefore, a MIAVR tailored patient-procedure approach to maintaining the pleura integrity positively impacts short-term and long-term outcomes.

Beyond the Timeline: One-year Mortality Trends in Early vs. Late Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis.

Among 302 episodes with prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), one-year mortality was 31%. There was no evidence indicating that early-onset PVE within 6 months from valve surgery led to a worse outcome compared to late-onset PVE (21% versus 32%; p=0.126), despite similar redo valve surgeries across both categories.

Mechanical versus Biological Mitral Valve Replacement: Insights from Propensity Score Matching on Survival and Reoperation Rates.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with symptomatic mitral valve disease unsuitable for repair can be sufficiently treated with surgical mitral valve replacement (MVR). The decision between biological and mechanical MVR (bMVR/mMVR) can be difficult, especially due to the question of the lesser of two evils: anticoagulation versus reoperation. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study included all patients undergoing MVR between 2001 and 2020. Thirty-day mortality and periprocedural complications were analyzed. Propensity-score matching (PSM) adjusted for age, gender, weight, height, endocarditis, diabetes, hypertension, PAOD, AFib, CKD, cancer, and history of neurological disorders was performed. After PSM, survival and cumulative incidence of reoperation at time of follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: The study included 2,027 patients in two main groups: 1,658 patients with bMVR, and 369 with mMVR; 51.2% were male. Age at surgery was 65.9±12.9 years. Median follow-up time was 6.83 years (IQR 1.11-10.61 years). Concomitant procedures were performed in 1,467 cases (72.4%). PSM yielded comparable groups of 339 pairs. Both groups showed comparable survival (p=0.203). Survival after mMVR and bMVR was comparable for all analyzed time points over the course of 20 years. Patients with mMVR showed a significantly lower cumulative incidence for reoperation (20-year: 15% vs. 59%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up of 20 years at a high-volume center demonstrates comparable survival after mechanical or biological mitral valve replacement (MVR), while reoperation rates are significantly lower after mMVR.

Takotsubo syndrome after concomitant surgical ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: A clinical case and review.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is a reversible form of acute heart failure often triggered by physical or emotional stressors. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) has become a prevalent approach for treating mitral valve pathologies, yet its association with TTS remains underexplored. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a female patient undergoing MIMVS with concomitant Maze ablation, who developed TTS postoperatively. Despite a normal coronary angiogram, transient coronary spasm due to an imbalance in autonomic nervous activity was considered. The patient exhibited preoperative risk factors including sequelae of cerebral infarction. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Female patients undergoing MIMVS with preoperative risk factors such as cerebral infarction sequelae may be at increased risk of developing TTS postoperatively. CONCLUSION: The InterTAK Diagnostic score, in conjunction with the International Expert Consensus Document on Takotsubo Syndrome, aids in promptly diagnosing TTS and differentiating it from acute coronary syndrome. Further research is warranted to elucidate the relationship between MIMVS and TTS.

The place of splenectomy in the therapeutic management of patients with infective endocarditis and splenic abscess: A single center experience and a literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Infective endocarditis(IE) has a low incidence, but it remains a serious disease with high mortality rates. Only 5 % of these patients will develop a splenic abscess, and the number of patients that have IE and a splenic abscess requiring surgery is low. The current guidelines recommend that splenectomy should be performed prior to valve replacement, but there is no strong evidence to support this statement and no evidence to clearly endorse the order in which the surgical interventions should be performed. The objective of this review and case series is to establish the proper treatment strategy, to assess the adequate order of the surgical interventions and to clarify the role of percutaneous drainage in the management of these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients with infective endocarditis and splenic abscess who underwent surgery in our institution, between January 2008 and December 2020 were included in this study, excluding patients which had cardiac device related endocarditis. Literature review on the matter included a number of 30 studies which were selected from the PubMed database. RESULTS: Assessing the literature and case series no reinfection was reported for simultaneously performing splenectomy(S) and valvular surgery(VS) nor for VS followed by S. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous drainage of the splenic abscesses is a feasible solution as definitive therapy in high-risk patients or as bridge therapy. Additional studies are needed, even though they are difficult to conduct, therefore a national/international infectious endocarditis register may be of use to clarify these challenges.

Minimally Invasive Surgery through Right Mini-Thoracotomy for Mitral Valve Infective Endocarditis: Contraindicated or Safely Possible?

Background: Mitral valve infective endocarditis (IE) still has a high mortality. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) is technically more challenging, especially in patients with endocarditis. Here, we compare the early postoperative outcome of patients with endocarditis and other indications for MIMVS. Methods: Two groups were formed, one consisting of patients who underwent surgery because of mitral valve endocarditis (IE group: n = 75) and the other group consisting of patients who had another indication for MIMVS (non-IE group: n = 862). Patients were observed for 30 postoperative days. Data were retrospectively reviewed and collected from January 2011 to September 2023. Results: Patients from the IE group were younger (60 vs. 68 years; p < 0.001) and had a higher preoperative history of stroke (26% vs. 6%; p < 0.001) with neurological symptoms (26% vs. 9%; p < 0.001). No difference was seen in overall surgery time (211 vs. 206 min; p = 0.71), time on cardiopulmonary bypass (137 vs. 137 min; p = 0.42) and aortic clamping time (76 vs. 78 min; p = 0.42). Concerning postoperative data, the IE group had a higher requirement of erythrocyte transfusion (2 vs. 0; p = 0.041). But no difference was seen in the need for a mitral valve redo procedure, bleeding, postoperative stroke, cerebral bleeding, new-onset dialysis, overall intubation time, sepsis, pacemaker implantation, wound healing disorders and 30-day mortality. Conclusions: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery in patients with mitral valve endocarditis is feasible and safe. Infective endocarditis should not be considered as a contraindication for MIMVS.

Hypothermic Ventricular Fibrillation in Redo Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: A Promising Solution for a Surgical Challenge.

Background: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) is a treatment for severe mitral valve pathologies. In redo cases, especially after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery with patent mammary bypass grafts, establishing aortic clamping followed by antegrade cardioplegia application might be challenging. Here, we present the outcome of hypothermic ventricular fibrillation as an alternative to conventional cardioprotection. Methods: Patients who underwent MIMVS either received hypothermic ventricular fibrillation (study group, n = 48) or antegrade cardioprotection (control group, n = 840) and were observed for 30 postoperative days. Data were retrospectively analyzed and collected from January 2011 until December 2022. Results: Patients in the study group had a higher preoperative prevalence of renal insufficiency (p = 0.001), extracardiac arteriopathy (p = 0.001), insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (p = 0.001) and chronic lung disease (p = 0.036). Furthermore, they had a longer surgery time and a lower repair rate (p < 0.001). No difference, however, was seen in postoperative incidences of stroke (p = 0.26), myocardial infarction (p = 1) and mitral valve re-operation (p = 1) as well as 30-day mortality (p = 0.1) and postoperative mitral valve insufficiency or stenosis. Conclusions: The patients who underwent redo MIMVS with hypothermic ventricular fibrillation did not have worse outcomes or more serious adverse events compared to the patients who received routine conventional cardioprotection. Therefore, the use of hypothermic ventricular fibrillation appears to be a promising cardioprotective technique in this challenging patient population requiring redo MIMVS.

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through a right anterior thoracotomy.

This study elucidates the efficacy and outcomes of a minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via a right anterior mini-thoracotomy, emphasizing its potential to minimize surgical trauma and expedite recovery while maintaining procedural integrity comparable to that of a traditional full sternotomy. This video tutorial demonstrates a successful aortic valve replacement procedure using the right anterior mini-thoracotomy approach, characterized by the absence of sutureless valves and specialized instruments. The detailed surgical procedure includes specific steps to optimize visibility and access through strategic incisions and rib dislocations, adhering to "the box principle" for effective exposure of the aortic valve. This video tutorial suggests that a right anterior mini-thoracotomy is a viable, cost-effective alternative to a conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement, offering significant patient benefits without compromising long-term valve function or safety. The broader implications for patient selection and surgical techniques highlight the need for meticulous preoperative planning and anatomical assessment to maximize the potential of a right anterior mini-thoracotomy in clinical practice.