A Systematic Review to Evaluate the Barriers to Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Disability.

Background: Breast cancer (BC) is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. There are observed disparities in patients with disability as compared to those without disability, which leads to poor BC screening attendance, thereby worsening disease management. Aim: The aim of this systematic review is to investigate if there are disparities in screening rates in women with disability as compared to those without disability, as well as the different factors that pose barriers to patients with disability for enrolment in BC screening programs. Method: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically reviewed published articles between 2008 and 2023, which assessed different factors that contributed to poor attendance in BC screening programs held across different countries. Detailed study characteristics were obtained, and methodological quality assessment was performed on the individual studies included in this review. Result: A total of fifty-three articles were identified as eligible studies based on the pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. These included 7,252,913 patients diagnosed with BC (913,902 patients with disability/6,339,011 patients without disability). The results revealed there are demographic, clinical, financial, and service-related barriers that contributed to lower screening rates in disabled patients as compared to non-disabled. Patient age is the most common factor, with the highest effect observed for 80 years (vs. 30-44 years) [odds ratio (OR) = 13.93 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 8.27-23.47), p < 0.0001], followed by race/ethnicity for Hispanic (vs. non-Hispanic white) [OR = 9.5 (95%CI = 1.0-91.9), p < 0.05]. Additionally, patients with multiple disabilities had the highest rate of dropouts [OR = 27.4 (95%CI = 21.5-33.3)]. Other factors like education, income, marital status, and insurance coverage were essential barriers in screening programs. Conclusions: This study presents a holistic view of all barriers to poor BC screening attendance in disabled patients, thereby exacerbating health inequalities. A standardized approach to overcome the identified barriers and the need for a tailored guideline, especially for disability groups, is inevitable.

Brazilian Women in Paralympic Sports: Uncovering Historical Milestones in the Summer Paralympic Games.

The journey of Brazilian female Paralympians transcends mere statistical increases in women's participation. Behind the modest athlete growth lies the reality of women who are doubly marginalized by the intersection of gender and disability in an arena tailored for able-bodied men. Our study aimed to catalyze critical discourses surrounding the historical trajectory of Paralympic women's sports. Through a comprehensive documentary analysis based on the Brazilian Paralympic Committee's official documents from 1976 to 2021, we sought to shed light on this complex scenario. Numerically, Brazil's representation comprised 229 women who, predominantly, had physical impairments and engaged in individual sports. In addition to a sporting legacy deeply entrenched in physical rehabilitation with limited opportunities for team-based sports, we observed negative influences stemming from ableist and sexist narratives. A thorough investigation into Paralympic milestones revealed a multitude of social barriers and highlighted the significant impact of societal changes in reshaping athletic opportunities and challenging traditional stereotypes.

Time Series Trend in High BMI and High Out-of-Pocket Expenditure Among Women With Disability.

Health with disability is directly related not only to an individual's quality of life but also to national medical finance. This study focuses on trends in BMI and out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure of both types of indirect cost exclusion and inclusion. Participants were women with disability (n = 3200) and women without disability (n = 53 082) among adults aged 19 and older from Korea Health Panel from 2009 to 2016. Women with disability had a higher BMI (23.9) than women without disability (22.7), and this time series trend was significant for 8 years (P < .0001). Annual OOP expenditures of both types were higher for women with disability than for women without disability (P < .0001): excluding indirect costs, $518.9 versus $649.4; Including indirect costs, $534.5 versus $681.8. The y-intercept of disability itself and slope of one unit of BMI for both types of annual OOP expenditure is significant (P < 0001): excluding indirect cost, $29.0 and $4.4; including indirect cost, $35.2 versus $4.6. In women with disability, annual OOP expenditure for both types were higher when they were physically inactive (P < .05): excluding indirect cost, $714.1 versus $823.1; including indirect cost, $746.2 versus $880.0. When physical inactivity and overweight and obesity interacted, it increased more than normal weight in dose response manner (P < .05): excluding indirect costs, $799.2 < $800.3 < $886.1; Including indirect costs, $860.2 < $845.9 < $927.5. These results suggest that women with disability are in relatively poor health. It is proposed that inequality of BMI for women with disability can be developed as an agenda from health policy.

Physical Access Related User-Friendliness of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services for Women With Disabilities in Various Hospitals in a City in North India: An Integrated Qualitative and Quantitative Study.

INTRODUCTION: Access to optimum health care services is vital for every woman. Women with disabilities (WWD), in particular, face multiple discrimination and social exclusion on this issue. The objective of the study was to evaluate the user-friendliness of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in terms of the physical access to health facilities in various hospitals in a city in north India. METHODS: This cross-sectional evaluation study was conducted during 2013-2017 in five purposively selected major government hospitals in a city in north India. A disabled friendliness evaluation tool was used to analyze the barriers to physical access in terms of approach to SRH care facilities. Data analysis was done through Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) and content analysis.  Results: Overall, 270 respondents aged 15 years and above with at least 40% disability were interviewed for the study. Lack of access to SRH care in hospitals (infrastructure/equipment/communication/transport) was the main barrier (46.36%) reported by WWD. Most of the hospitals lacked any special provisions for people with disability (PWD). Proper ramps, stairs, toilets, etc. were not present in hospitals as denoted by their verbatim responses. CONCLUSIONS: All the hospitals scored low on access to sexual and reproductive health services for WWD.

Comparison of the use of prenatal care services and the risk of preterm birth between pregnant women with disabilities and those without disabilities: A nationwide cohort study.

Objective: The difficulties faced by pregnant women with disabilities in accessing health care may make them less likely to receive prenatal care. The aims of this study were to compare the number of prenatal services and the risk of preterm birth between pregnant women with and without disabilities. Methods: A total of 2999 pregnant women aged ≥20 years with birth records in 2011-2014 in Taiwan were enrolled. Data were obtained from the Registration File for Physical and Mental Disabilities and the National Health Insurance Research Database. A 1:4 matching between pregnant women with disabilities and those without disabilities was performed. The logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equations was used to analyze. Results: The median of prenatal care services used by pregnant women with disabilities was 9.00 (interquartile range, IQR: 2.00). Pregnant women with disabilities used fewer services than those without disabilities (median, 10.00; IQR: 1.00). The disabled group (8.44%) had a significantly higher proportion of preterm births than did the non-disabled group (5.40%). The disabled group was at a 1.30 times higher risk of preterm births than was the non-disabled group. Conclusions: Pregnant women with disabilities used significantly fewer prenatal care services and had a significantly higher risk of preterm birth than pregnant women without disabilities.

Qualitative Descriptive Study of Childbirth Educators' Perspectives on Prenatal Education for Women With Physical Disability.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the knowledge, experiences, and perceptions of childbirth educators about providing childbirth education to women with physical disability. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive design. SETTING: Telephone interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen childbirth educators. METHODS: We used a semistructured interview guide to explore participants' knowledge, experiences, and perceptions of providing childbirth education to women with physical disability. We audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed the interviews using content analysis. RESULTS: We identified four themes: Importance of Childbirth Education for All Women, Inadequate Knowledge About Physical Disability, Willingness to Learn About Physical Disability, and Misconceptions and Assumptions About Women With Physical Disability. CONCLUSION: Participants reported little knowledge about the needs of pregnant women with physical disability and limited experience with them in childbirth education classes. They reported eagerness to learn about disability and its effect on pregnancy to help provide meaningful education to women with physical disability. Childbirth educators need to develop and implement innovative approaches to reach women with physical disability, provide information relevant to their needs, and address the misconceptions and assumptions they may have about women with physical disability and pregnancy.

Women with disabilities in hearing: the last mile in the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV - a cross-sectional study from Zambia.

This article explored the differences in HIV testing in the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (EMTCT) between women with and without disabilities aged 16-55 years, reported being pregnant and receiving the social cash transfers (SCT) social safety nets in Luapula province, Zambia. We tested for associations between HIV testing in EMTCT and disability using logistic regression analyses. We calculated a functional score for each woman to determine if they had mild, moderate or severe difficulties and controlled for age, intimate partner sexual violence, and the SCT receipt. Of 1692 women, 29.8% (504) reported a disability, 724 (42.8%) mild, 203 (12.0%) moderate, and 83 (4.9%) severe functional difficulties (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.70). Women with moderate (aOR 2.04; 95% CI 1.44-2.88) or mild difficulties (aOR 1.66; 95% CI 1.32-2.08) or with a disability in cognition (aOR 1.67 95% CI 1.22-2.29) reported testing more for HIV than women without disabilities; Women with a disability in hearing (aOR 0.36 CI 0.16-0.80) reported testing less for HIV. Disability is common among women receiving the SCT in the study area accessing HIV testing in the EMTCT setting. HIV testing in EMTCT is challenging for women with disabilities in hearing.

Factors associated with access to sexual and reproductive health services among women with disabilities in Nepal.

Aim: The aim of the study is to investigate the relationships between social determinants and disability status and access and use of sexual and reproductive health services among women with disabilities in Nepal. Materials ad methods: This study used data on women with disability from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) of 2019, in which 13,320 women and 290 women with disabilities were included for the analysis. We used bivariate analysis to compare the social determinants with disability status and multivariate logistic regression to determine the association between social determinants and access and use of sexual and reproductive health services among women with disabilities. Findings: The findings showed, in comparison with non-disabled women, women with disabilities had low education, low economic status, low media exposure and low access to sexual and reproductive health. On provincial level, those from Madesh [AOR = 0.22 (95%CI:0.06, 0.76)] and Lumbini [AOR = 0.24 (95%CI:0.06,0.88)] had lower attitude to violence. The usage of family planning (FP) methods among women with disabilities in Karnali [AOR = 3.57 (95% CI: 1.42-13.22)] and Sudurpashchim [AOR = 1.05 (95% CI: 1.01-1.071)] was higher than those in Province 1. Women with disabilities with secondary education were more than nine times [AOR = 9.28(95%CI:2.67,32,26)] and primary education had more than three times [AOR = 3.59 (95%CI:1.07, 12.02)] of knowledge on HIV/AIDS compared to those of no education. The odds of being tested for HIV/AIDS among women with disabilities with secondary education was more than eight times [AOR = 8.8 (95% CI:2.23-34.6)] than those of no education. Conclusion: This study provides noteworthy findings that women with disabilities have poor socioeconomic status, high-risk behavior, and low access to sexual and reproductive health services in Nepal. This study highlights the significance of actions needed to address sexual and reproductive health services in Nepal that unfairly impact women with disabilities.

Testing the effect of an integrated-intervention to promote access to sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights among women with disabilities in Ghana: a quasi-experimental study protocol.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that women with disabilities (WWDs) experience the most difficulty accessing and using sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHRs) services and information worldwide. However, there are currently no workable interventions to reach WWDs with essential SRHR services. This study aims to test the effect of an integrated health facility and individual-level intervention on access to SRHRs information and services among sexually active WWDs aged 15-49 years in Ghana. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study design with four arms will be implemented in four districts in the Northern region of Ghana to test the effect of three inter-related interventions. The inventions are (1) capacity building in disability-centred SRHRs information and service delivery for healthcare providers, (2) support for WWDs to access disability-unfriendly healthcare infrastructure, and (3) one-on-one regular SRHRs education, information provision, and referral. The first two interventions are at the health-facility level while the third one is at the individual/family level. The first arm of the experiment will expose eligible WWDs to all three interventions. In the second arm, WWDs will be exposed to only the two-health facility-level interventions. The third arm will expose WWDs to only the individual level intervention. The forth arm will constitute the control group. A total of 680 (170 in each arm) sexually active women with physical disability and visual impairments will take part in the study over a period of 12 months. To assess the effect of the interventions on key study outcomes (i.e. awareness about, and use of modern contraceptive, ANC attendance, and skilled delivery among parous women), pre- and post-intervention surveys will be conducted. Difference-in-Difference analysis will be used to examine the effect of each intervention in comparison to the control group, while controlling for confounders. Cost-effectiveness analyses will also be conducted on the three-intervention arms vis a vis changes in key outcome measures to identify which of the three interventions is likely to yield greater impact with lower costs. DISCUSSION: Lack of access to SRHRs information and services for WWDs is not only a violation of their right to appropriate and quality SRH care but could also undermine efforts to achieve equitable healthcare access as envisaged under SDG 3. This research is expected to generate evidence to inform local health programmes to increase access to SRHRs among WWDs by strengthening local health system capacity to provide disability-sensitive SRHRs services. Trial registration Name of the registry: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR). Trial ID: 14591. Date of registration: 02/01/2020. URL of trial registry record: https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/Researcher/TrialRegister.aspx?TrialID=14591.

Women with disabilities (WWDs) experience a lot of difficulty accessing sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHRs) services and information worldwide. However, there are currently no workable specific interventions to reach WWDs with essential SRHRs services. We propose to implement three interventions to enable WWDs in Ghana who are aged 15­49 years gain better access to SRHRs services and information. Our aim is show whether these interventions have beneficial effects by helping many more WWDs access and use SRHRs services and information like modern contraceptives. To achieve this objective, we will (1) train healthcare providers in ways to better provide SRHRs information and service to WWDs; (2) support WWDs to access disability-unfriendly healthcare infrastructure by creating access ramps at health facilities; (3) train and deploy community health volunteers to undertake one-on-one regular home visits to educate WWDs on SRHRs, provide information on SRHRs and refer WWDs to healthcare providers. A total of 680 sexually active women with physical and visual impairments will take part in the study over a period of 12 months. We will divide the women into four groups (170 in each group). The first group will be exposed to all the three interventions. The second group will be exposed to only interventions 1 and 2. The third group will be exposed to only intervention 3. The fourth group will not be exposed to any of the three interventions. Our study is expected to strengthen the local health system capacity to provide disability-sensitive SRHRs services.

Modern Contraceptive Use and Associated Factors among Women with Disabilities in Gondar City, Amhara Region, North West Ethiopia: A Cross Sectional Study.

Attention to the sexual reproductive health needs of persons with disabilities is important to ensure the protection and promotion of their human rights, to move forward the international development agenda, and to build a truly inclusive society. The objective of this study was to assess modern contraceptive use and associated factors among women with disabilities in Gondar city, Ethiopia. A community-based cross- sectional study was employed, from 25 June to 05 August 2013. All 280 reproductive age women with disabilities who were found in the town during study period were included. Data were coded, entered and cleaned using EPI INFO statistical software version 3.5.2, and analysed by Software Statistical Packages for Social Sciences version 16. About 18% of participants had ever used modern contraceptive and the contraceptive prevalence rate among study participants and currently married women were 13.1% and 20.2% respectively. One fourth of respondents believed that existing family planning service delivery points were not accessible. The proportion of modern contraceptive use among participants was low. Age, marital status, education, income, and type of disability were significant predictors of modern contraceptive use. Therefore, social behavioural change communication interventions should be designed to improve the awareness of people living with disabilities on modern contraceptives based on the needs and type of disabilities.

Comparing women with and without disabilities in five-site "Healthy Weight" interventions for lesbian/bisexual women over 40.

BACKGROUND: Lesbian/bisexual women with physical disabilities (LBPD) are an under-studied population. OBJECTIVES: This study compared LBPD to LB women without physical disabilities as defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act on socio-demographic variables, health characteristics, and quality of life, physical activity, weight, and nutrition outcomes following a health intervention. METHODS: Data came from the Healthy Weight in Lesbian and Bisexual Women Study (HWLB) where 376 LB women were recruited into five geographically dispersed interventions. Baseline data were examined to compare women with and without physical disabilities as defined by the ADA, and pre/post intervention data were analyzed for differences in treatment outcomes including quality of life, physical activity, nutrition, and body size. RESULTS: Compared to women without disability, LBPD were more likely to be bisexual or another sexual identity than lesbian, single, report poor or fair health status, postmenopausal, and had a higher body mass index and waist circumference to height ratio. LBPD women were less likely to work and to drink heavily, and reported reduced physical and mental health quality of life. In spite of these differences, after the intervention, LBPD had similar outcomes to women without disabilities on most measures, and were more likely to show improvements in physical quality of life and consumption of fruits/vegetables. CONCLUSIONS: Although different from women without disabilities on many socio-demographic and health variables at baseline, the study suggests that LBPD have similar outcomes to women without disabilities, or may even do better, in group health interventions.

Reach of the Montana Cancer Control Program to Women with Disabilities.

Women with disabilities have lower screening rates for breast and cervical cancer with some evidence suggesting that people with disabilities experience higher cancer mortality and may receive a different course of treatment. This study examined whether women with and without disabilities using Montana Cancer Control Program (MCCP) differ in use of breast (BCS) and cervical (CCS) screening services, receipt of and follow up for inconclusive or abnormal results, and compliance with BCS and CCS US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. Study participants were women eligible for MCCP screening services between November 2012 and October 2014, with eligibility based on insurance status (underinsured/no insurance), income requirements (<200 % poverty based on income/household size), and age. The data derive from participant self-report (demographic, disability, and health history including previous mammogram or Papanicolaou test) and MCCP records of screening tests (clinical breast exam, mammogram, or Pap test), results, and follow up visits. About 11.5 % of MCCP participants reported having a disability. MCCP recipients with a disability were significantly older, more likely to be non-Hispanic White, and more likely to have poor health profiles. Disability status did not affect use of MCCP screening services, screening outcome, or follow up for inconclusive or abnormal results. However, women with disability had significantly lower BCS and CCS compliance (based on US Preventive Task Force guidelines) than women without disability, which persisted in adjusted analyses controlling for other significant factors. The MCCP is reaching un/underinsured Montana women with disabilities. While disability status in this sample was not related to use of MCCP services or screening outcome, MCCP recipients with disabilities have significantly lower BCS and CCS compliance. Efforts to increase compliance for un/underinsured Montana women with a disability are warranted.