Hepatic Bile Acid Reuptake in the Rat Depends on Bile Acid Conjugation but Not on Agonistic Properties towards FXR and TGR5.

Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and Takeda G-protein coupled receptor 5 (TGR5) are the two known bile acid (BA) sensitive receptors and are expressed in the intestine and liver as well as in extra-enterohepatic tissues. The physiological effects of extra-enterohepatic FXR/TRG5 remain unclear. Further, the extent BAs escape liver reabsorption and how they interact with extra-enterohepatic FXR/TGR5 is understudied. We investigated if hepatic BA reuptake differed between BAs agonistic for FXR and TGR5 compared to non-agonists in the rat. Blood was collected from the portal vein and inferior caval vein from anesthetized rats before and 5, 20, 30, and 40 min post stimulation with sulfated cholecystokinin-8. Plasma concentrations of 20 different BAs were assessed by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Total portal vein BA AUC was 3-4 times greater than in the vena cava inferior (2.7 ± 0.6 vs. 0.7 ± 0.2 mM x min, p < 0.01, n = 8) with total unconjugated BAs being 2-3-fold higher than total conjugated BAs (AUC 8-10 higher p < 0.05 for both). However, in both cases, absolute ratios varied greatly among different BAs. The average hepatic reuptake of BAs agonistic for FXR/TGR5 was similar to non-agonists. However, as the sum of non-agonist BAs in vena portae was 2-3-fold higher than the sum agonist (p < 0.05), the peripheral BA pool was composed mostly of non-agonist BAs. We conclude that hepatic BA reuptake varies substantially by type and does not favor FXR/TGR5 BAs agonists.

Primary biliary cirrhosis and bile acids.

The dihydroxylated bile acid ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has now been regarded for 20 years as the standard treatment for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), a chronic cholestatic immune-mediated condition marked by progressive destruction of small intrahepatic bile ducts, impaired biliary secretion, hepatocellular retention of toxic endogenous bile acids and, ultimately, the development of fibrosis leading to cirrhosis that commonly requires liver transplantation. At first sight, it seems intriguing that a bile acid could be considered for use as a therapeutic agent in a bile-acid secretion disorder. Yet, in addition to its inherently greater hydrophilic nature and competitive effect on endogenous bileacid recycling, UDCA has indeed been demonstrated to be a potent post-transcriptional secretagogue as well as a potential anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic agent. While the combined glucocorticoid receptor/pregnane X receptor (PXR) agonist budesonide, in combinaison with UDCA, has been shown to exert additional beneficial effects in PBC, significant progress in understanding the regulatory mechanisms involved in bile-acid homeostasis has led to the identification of nuclear [farnesoid X receptor (FXR), PXR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα)] and membrane (the membrane G protein-coupled bile acid receptor TGR5) receptors as critical pharmacological targets for future therapeutic approaches. Encouraging data from recent experimental and phase-II studies tend to confirm that the FXR agonist obeticholic acid and the PPARα agonists bezafibrate and fenofibrate may be used as add-on therapies in PBC patients with inadequate responses to UDCA or even as alternative first-line agents. These results could mark the beginning of a new therapeutic era for PBC.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis and bile acids.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a rare and complex chronic cholestatic liver disease, and its management is hindered by a very poor understanding of its pathogenesis. Endogenous bile acids are likely to play a role either directly or indirectly in the pathogenesis and/or progression of PSC ('toxic-bile'hypothesis). At present, no medical therapies have been proven to delay disease progression. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the agent that has received the most attention. Based on large randomized studies, it appears that UDCA at doses from 13 to 23 mg/kg/d has no proven benefit on survival, but is well tolerated and improves serum liver tests and surrogate markers of prognosis whereas, at higher doses (28-30 mg/kg/d), it is associated with a worsened outcome. However, except at very high doses and despite the controversies, many hepatologists still consider UDCA a reasonable treatment choice. Indeed, its use at dosages of 15-20 mg/kg/d has recently been approved for the treatment of PSC by the French National Health Authority. In addition, 24-nor-ursodeoxycholic acid, a side-chain-modified UDCA derivative, has shown promising results in animal models of PSC and is currently under investigation in humans.

Ursodeoxycholic acid and bile-acid mimetics as therapeutic agents for cholestatic liver diseases: an overview of their mechanisms of action.

Chronic cholestasis and liver inflammation are the two main pathophysiological components of the two major classes of disease - primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) - leading to bile duct destruction and ultimately to cirrhosis and liver failure. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), initially introduced as a therapeutic approach to counteract the cholestatic components to PBC and PSC, was subsequently shown to exhibit unexpected anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatoty properties. The use of farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and TGR5 agonists in various animal models have confirmed early observations indicating that bile acids are not only toxicants and inflammagens, but also repressors of innate and adaptive immunity. Obeticholic acid is a bile-acid mimetic, with no toxic or inflammagen behavior, that strongly activates FXR to combat the toxic effects of high concentrations of bile acid. Because UDCA is not an FXR agonist, its combination with obeticholic acid could be a promising tool for the treatment of PBC and PSC. In this overview, the biological properties of UDCA, NorUDCA and FXR agonists are highlighted, as well as their overlapping mechanisms of action in inflammatory biliary disorders.

Structural basis for bile acid binding and activation of the nuclear receptor FXR.

The nuclear receptor FXR is the sensor of physiological levels of enterohepatic bile acids, the end products of cholesterol catabolism. Here we report crystal structures of the FXR ligand binding domain in complex with coactivator peptide and two different bile acids. An unusual A/B ring juncture, a feature associated with bile acids and no other steroids, provides ligand discrimination and triggers a pi-cation switch that activates FXR. Helix 12, the activation function 2 of the receptor, adopts the agonist conformation and stabilizes coactivator peptide binding. FXR is able to interact simultaneously with two coactivator motifs, providing a mechanism for enhanced binding of coactivators through intermolecular contacts between their LXXLL sequences. These FXR complexes provide direct insights into the design of therapeutic bile acids for treatment of hyperlipidemia and cholestasis.

Cholecystokinin increases bile acid synthesis with total parenteral nutrition but does not prevent stone formation.

Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is associated with cholestasis and gallstones. Gallbladder stasis may be important in the development of gallstones, and cholecystokinin (CCK) to stimulate gallbladder contraction has been proposed as a treatment to prevent this complication. We studied in vivo bile acid synthesis and bile acid output in miniswine on TPN to test whether daily CCK improves bile acid output and normalizes bile acid profiles with TPN. Nine miniswine were nutritionally maintained with TPN for 4 weeks; four pigs received CCK (0.1 mg/kg) iv daily. In vivo bile acid synthesis was measured with injection of 7 alpha-tritiated cholesterol. An increase in tritiated water reflects the activity of 7 alpha-hydroxylation, the rate-limiting step in bile acid synthesis. At the end of 4 weeks, bile was collected and bile acid output and bile salt profiles were determined. One of five animals on TPN developed gallstones while two of four receiving daily CCK developed stones. In vivo bile acid synthesis decreased with TPN (controls, 63 +/- 9 mg/24 hr versus TPN, 13 +/- 4 mg/24 hr) and increased in TPN animals with CCK treatment (TPN-CCK, 105 +/- 35 mg/24 hr). Bile acid profiles are changed with TPN with more secondary bile acids, this was not improved with CCK. CCK improved bile acid synthesis and bile acid output but failed to prevent gallstone formation or normalize bile salt profiles. In addition to promoting gallbladder contraction, CCK may have a stimulatory effect on bile acid synthesis. CCK alone did not prevent gallstone formation.