[Clinical Efficacy of Anchor Suture Bridge Technique for Avulsion Fractures of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Insertion Point in the Knee Joint]. / é”šé’‰ç¼çº¿æ¡¥æŠ€æœ¯å¯¹è†å ³èŠ‚åŽäº¤å‰éŸ§å¸¦èƒ«éª¨æ­¢ç‚¹æ’•è„±éª¨æŠ˜çš„ä¸´åºŠç–—æ•ˆ.

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of the anchor suture bridge technique in treating avulsion fractures at the tibial insertion point of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in the knee joint. Methods: In this study, we reviewed 80 patients with PCL tibial avulsion fractures treated using the anchor suture bridge technique in our department from February 2010 to December 2023. Follow-ups were conducted starting at 3 months post-surgery, then every 3 months until 12 months post-surgery. Clinical and follow-up data of each patient were analyzed. The Lysholm and Hospital for Special Surgery Knee-Rating Scale (HSS) scores of knee function before surgery and at the last follow-up were compared to assess the surgical treatment outcome. Results: The 80 patients were followed up for an average of (12.16±1.08) months post-surgery. Re-examination X-rays showed that all fractures had healed, with an average healing time of (3.66±0.51) months. All patients recovered well, with primary healing of surgical incisions and no complications such as neurovascular injury, skin necrosis, incision infection, fracture displacement, or ligament laxity. Postoperative knee Lysholm and HSS scores were significantly higher than preoperative scores. At the last follow-up, the Lysholm score increased from (46.30±6.10) preoperatively to (90.85±3.27), and the HSS score increased from (45.30±5.80) to (91.15±2.66), with statistically significant differences (P<0.025). Conclusion: The anchor suture bridge technique is effective in treating avulsion fractures of the PCL tibial insertion point in the knee joint. It has a high safety profile and leads to good postoperative knee function recovery, with no serious postoperative complications, demonstrating excellent clinical efficacy.

3D-printed porous titanium suture anchor: a rabbit lateral femoral condyle model.

BACKGROUND: The inclusion of a connecting path in a porous implant can promote nutrient diffusion to cells and enhance bone ingrowth. Consequently, this study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical, radiographic, and histopathological performance of a novel 3D-printed porous suture anchor in a rabbit femur model. METHODS: Three test groups were formed based on the type of suture anchor (SA): Commercial SA (CSA, Group A, n = 20), custom solid SA (CSSA, Group B, n = 20), and custom porous SA (CPSA, Group C, n = 20). The SAs were implanted in the lateral femoral condyle of the right leg in each rabbit. The rabbits (New Zealand white rabbits, male, mean body weight of 2.8 ± 0.5 kg, age 8 months) underwent identical treatment and were randomized into experimental and control groups via computer-generated randomization. Five rabbits (10 femoral condyles) were euthanized at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-implantation for micro-CT, histological analysis, and biomechanical testing. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, the CPSA showed a higher BV/TV (median 0.7301, IQR 0.7276-0.7315) than the CSSA and CSA. The histological analysis showed mineralized osteocytes near the SA. At 4 weeks, new bone was observed around the CPSA and had penetrated its porous structure. By 12 weeks, there was no significant difference in ultimate failure load between the CSA and CPSA. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that the innovative 3D-printed porous suture anchor exhibited comparable pullout strength to conventional threaded suture anchors at the 12-week postoperative time-point period. Furthermore, our porous anchor design enhanced new bone formation and facilitated bone growth into the implant structure, resulting in improved biomechanical stability.

Osseous Triceps Avulsion in a 12-Year-Old Girl: A Case Report.

CASE: A 12-year-old girl presented with significant right elbow pain following a fall during soccer which caused an osseous triceps avulsion injury and nondisplaced type II Salter-Harris radial neck fracture. The patient was treated with successful open repair utilizing suture anchor fixation, resulting in full return of function and return to previous activities. CONCLUSION: Timely and accurate diagnosis and treatment of displaced triceps sleeve avulsion injuries is critical and can result in excellent patient outcomes and return to previous functional level. This unique case contributes to the diagnosis and management of this rare condition in pediatric populations.

Arthroscopic anterior deltoid plication with bone anchor is an effective procedure to control residual talar anterior translation after lateral ligament repair.

PURPOSE: Residual symptoms can be observed after ankle lateral ligament repairs commonly due to hyperlaxity, severe ankle instability or a failed stabilization. In order to increase joint stability, ligament or capsular-ligament plication has been used in other joints. Given that the anterior portion of the deltoid is a stabilizer against anterior talar translation, it could be used as an augmentation to restrict anterior talar translation. The aim of this study was to describe an arthroscopic anterior deltoid plication with a bony anchor as an augmentation to the lateral stabilization. The results in a series of eight patients were presented. METHODS: Eight patients (seven males, median age 31 [range, 22-43] years) presented residual instability after arthroscopic all inside lateral collateral ligament repair. Arthroscopic anterior deltoid ligament plication was performed in these patients. Median follow-up was 22 (range, 15-27) months. Using an automatic suture passer and a knotless anchor, the anterior deltoid was arthroscopically plicated to the anterior aspect of the medial malleolus. RESULTS: During the arthroscopic procedure, only an isolated detachment of the anterior talofibular ligament was observed without any deltoid open-book injury in any case. All patients reported subjective improvement in their ankle instability after the arthroscopic all-inside ligament repair and the anterior deltoid plication with a bony anchor. On clinical examination, the anterior drawer test was negative in all patients. The median American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score increased from 68 (range, 64-70) preoperatively to 100 (range, 90-100) at final follow-up. CONCLUSION: The arthroscopic anterior deltoid plication is a feasible procedure to augment stability and control anterior talar translation when treating chronic ankle instability in cases of residual excessive talar translation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Effect of geometrical design variables on implantation configuration and fixation stiffness of titling bone anchors: A parametric finite element study.

The mechanical interaction of a tilting anchor and cancellous bones of various densities was simulated using finite element modeling. The model enjoyed a sophisticated representation of the bone, as an elasto-plastic material with large deformation capability. The anchor's tilting action during implantation phase, as well as its fixation stiffness during pull-out test, were predicted by the model and a parametric study was performed to investigate the effects of the anchor's distal width and corner fillet radius, on these measures. The model predictions were validated against the results of an experimental test on ovine humerus specimens. The model could reasonably reproduce the tilting action of the anchor during the implantation phase. Comparison of the model predictions with the experimental results revealed similar trends during both the implantation and the pull-out phases, but smaller displacement magnitudes (end points: 1.4 vs. 2.1 mm and 4.6 vs. 5.2 mm, respectively). The results of the parametric study indicated substantial increase in the fixation stiffness with increasing bone density. Reducing the distal width and increasing the fillet radius improved the anchor's implantation configuration and fixation stiffness in low-density bones. For high-density bone applications, however, a larger distal width was favored for improving the fixation stiffness.

Safety of an anchor-based device for sacrospinous ligament fixation: A pilot case-control study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) is a popular surgical technique for treating apical prolapse. The use of suture-capturing devices (SCD), or the more recently introduced anchor-based device (ABD), is useful for a posterior approach but essential for an anterior one. The aim of our study was to assess the safety of the ABD, which was recently introduced to our unit, compared to the traditionally used SCD. METHODS: This was a pilot case-control study of 40 patients who had a SSLF, 20 of these represented all the patients who had the procedure with the aid of the ABD and 20 patients who had the procedure using the SCD over approximately the same duration. The main safety endpoints of this pilot study were patient reported postoperative pain scores and perioperative complications rate. RESULTS: The population characteristics were similar. The mean postoperative pain scores differed significantly only on postoperative day 1 in favor of the suture capturing device (3.40 [2.60] vs 1.60 [1.64], p = 0.013). The mean highest pain score was similar in both groups. Peri-operative complications rates were low and comparable between both groups. According to POPQ at 6 weeks follow-up the median Ba point was higher in the ABD group and this difference was significant (-3.00 [-3.00; -2.25] vs. -2.00 [-3.00; -1.50]; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The anchor-based device for sacrospinal ligament fixation seems to have comparable safety profile to the traditionally used suture capturing devices.

[Development and research progress of suture button fixation Latarjet procedure].

Objective: To review the development and research progress of suture button fixation Latarjet procedure. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to summarize the development and related modified techniques of the suture button fixation Latarjet procedure. Results: Since the Latarjet procedure was first introduced by French scholar Latarjet in 1954, it has undergone three key transformations, resulting in suture button fixation Latarjet procedure, which has shown satisfactory outcomes in treatment of recurrent shoulder dislocation. However, there are still drawbacks such as the risk of impingement of the graft on surrounding tissues, and the surgical disruption of anatomical structures like the coracoclavicular ligament and the pectoralis minor muscle. The scholars have proposed several modified techniques based on the suture button fixation Latarjet procedure to further reduce complications from impingement of the graft, to lower the glenohumeral contact pressure, and to eliminate the impact of surgery on the physiological structures of the shoulder joint. The modified techniques include the arthroscopic suture button fixation Latarjet procedure using FiberTape Cerclage, reconstruction of the coracoacromial ligament during congruent-arc Latarjet procedures, and limit unique coracoid osteotomy suture button Latarjet procedure (LU-tarjet procedure). These modified techniques have also shown good clinical outcomes. Additionally, other related modified techniques for reconstruction of the glenoid, such as Chinese unique Inlay Bristow procedure (Cuistow procedure), arthroscopic glenoid bone grafting with soft fixation, and all-arthroscopic modified Eden-Hybinette procedure, have also demonstrated favorable efficacy. However, there is still a lack of long-term follow-up results for these techniques and comparative studies between them. Conclusion: Suture button fixation Latarjet procedure is an effective method for the treatment of recurrent shoulder dislocation. There are various techniques, but there is no recognized gold standard, and further clinical and basic research is needed.

Resonance Frequency Analysis Identifies Implant- and Host-Related Factors Associated With Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant Stability.

HYPOTHESIS: Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) is a reliable, noninvasive method to assess the stability of bone-anchored hearing implants (BAHIs), although surgical-, implant-, and host-related factors can affect its outcome. BACKGROUND: BAHI plays an important role in restoring hearing function. However, implant- and host-related factors contribute to premature implant extrusion. To mitigate this, noninvasive methods to assess implant stability, along with a better understanding of factors contributing to BAHI failure, are needed. METHODS: We evaluated the utility of RFA to quantify implant stability in sawbone (bone mimicking material), 29 human cadaveric samples, and a prospective cohort of 29 pediatric and 27 adult participants, and identified factors associated with implant stability. To validate the use of RFA in BAHI, we compared RFA-derived implant stability quotient (ISQ) estimates to peak loads obtained from mechanical push-out testing. RESULTS: ISQ and peak loads were significantly correlated (Spearman rho = 0.48, p = 0.0088), and ISQ reliably predicted peak load up to 1 kN. We then showed that in cadaveric samples, abutment length, internal table bone volume, and donor age were significantly associated with implant stability. We validated findings in our prospective patient cohort and showed that minimally invasive Ponto surgery (MIPS; versus linear incision), longer implantation durations (>16 wk), older age (>25 yr), and shorter abutment lengths (≤10 mm) were associated with better implant stability. Finally, we characterized the short-term reproducibility of ISQ measurements in sawbone and patient implants. CONCLUSIONS: Together, our findings support the use of ISQ as a measure of implant stability and emphasize important considerations that impact implant stability, including surgical method, implant duration, age, and abutment lengths.

Does Reusable Instrumentation for Four-Anchor Rotator Cuff Repair Offer Decreased Waste Disposal Costs and Lower Waste-Related Carbon Emissions?

INTRODUCTION: Orthopaedic surgery is culpable, in part, for the excessive carbon emissions in health care partly due to the utilization of disposable instrumentation in most procedures, such as rotator cuff repair (RCR). To address growing concerns about hospital waste, some have considered replacing disposable instrumentation with reusable instrumentation. The purpose of this study was to estimate the cost and carbon footprint of waste disposal of RCR kits that use disposable instrumentation compared with reusable instrumentation. METHODS: The mass of the necessary materials and their packaging to complete a four-anchor RCR from four medical device companies that use disposable instrumentation and one that uses reusable instrumentation were recorded. Using the cost of medical waste disposal at our institution ($0.14 per kilogram) and reported values from the literature for carbon emissions produced from the low-temperature incineration of noninfectious waste (249 kgCO 2 e/t) and infectious waste (569 kgCO 2 e/t), we estimated the waste management cost and carbon footprint of waste disposal produced per RCR kit. RESULTS: The disposable systems of four commercial medical device companies had 783%, 570%, 1,051%, and 478%, respectively, greater mass and waste costs when compared with the reusable system. The cost of waste disposal for the reusable instrumentation system costs on average $0.14 less than the disposable instrumentation systems. The estimated contribution to the overall carbon footprint produced from the disposal of a RCR kit that uses reusable instrumentation was on average 0.37 kg CO2e less than the disposable instrumentation systems. CONCLUSION: According to our analysis, reusable instrumentation in four-anchor RCR leads to decreased waste and waste disposal costs and lower carbon emissions from waste disposal. Additional research should be done to assess the net benefit reusable systems may have on hospitals and the effect this may have on a long-term decrease in carbon footprint. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Modified-tension band suturing: 'the pulling the reins technique' - a technique for displaced proximal humeral fracture with medial column instability.

Fractures of the proximal humerus with medial column instability are challenging and present an unacceptable rate of complications and reoperations. Despite good results reported with the use of locking plates and augmentation techniques using bone graft or a second plate, varus subsidence and fixation failure have been frequently reported. We describe the case of a patient presenting with a complex, multifragmentary proximal humerus fractures successfully treated with open anatomic reduction and internal fixation using a locking plate augmented with lateral traction using three bone anchors in the humerus head. After 18 months, the patient reported fully recovering the mobility and functionality of the operated shoulder. The use of bone anchors pulling the humeral in three different directions like three vectors applied from medial to lateral, posterior to anterior and lateral to anterior help to reduce the most important deformities (varus and retroversion) by applying the tension band principle. This is an interesting approach to avoid primary and secondary reduction loss of the proximal fractures of the humerus with postero-medial cortical defect. The procedure is a good alternative to be used in patients with failure or insufficiency of the medial wall and marked varus.

Evaluation of a super powerful bone-anchored hearing system and its users: A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Although the Baha 5SP has been commercially available for six years, very few studies have been performed on the device's efficacy. The current study aims to evaluate the characteristics and audiological results in patients with severe-to-profound mixed hearing loss fitted with this superpower sound processor. METHODS: This retrospective evaluation was conducted at a tertiary referral centre where a series of 82 adult patients with severe-to-profound mixed hearing loss were implanted with a percutaneous bone-anchored hearing system and fitted with a superpower sound processor between 2016 and 2019. Patients with incomplete or unreliable audiological data (n = 24) were excluded, resulting in 58 data sets for analysis. The main outcome measures were unaided and aided pure-tone thresholds and aided free-field speech perception in quiet. RESULTS: The median unaided air conduction (AC) threshold averaged across 0.5, 1 and 2 kHz (PTA0.5-2kHz) of all patients was 75 dB hearing loss (HL); the median unaided AC averaged across 1, 2 and 4 kHz (PTA1-4kHz) was 84 dB HL. For bone conduction and direct bone conduction, the median PTA0.5-2kHz was 52 and 47 dB HL, respectively. With the superpower device, the median free-field speech reception threshold was 54 dB sound pressure level (SPL), and the median speech perception score at 65 dB SPL was 80%. CONCLUSIONS: At least 75% of the patients reached a maximum phoneme score of 70%. For patients with lower scores, the superpower device still provides a substantial hearing benefit. This makes the superpower device particularly suitable for patients with severe-to-profound mixed hearing loss with a contraindication for conventional hearing aids and/or cochlear implants.

Study on the therapeutic effect of Kirschner wire tension band combined with anchor cross-stitch technique in the treatment of comminuted patellar inferopolar fractures.

PURPOSES: Fractures of the inferior patellar pole, unlike other patellar fractures, present challenges for traditional surgical fixation methods. This article introduces the clinical technique and outcomes of using Kirschner wire tension band combined with anchor screw cross-stitch fixation for comminuted inferior patellar pole fractures. METHODS: This retrospective case series study included 14 patients with comminuted inferior patellar pole fractures treated at our institution from September 1, 2020, to April 30, 2022. All patients underwent surgery using the Kirschner wire tension band with anchor screw cross-stitch technique. Follow-up assessments involved postoperative X-rays to evaluate fracture healing, as well as clinical parameters such as healing time, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, range of motion (ROM), and Bostman scores. RESULTS: All patients were followed for an average of over 12 months, with no cases of internal fixation failure. Knee joint stability and function were excellent. X-rays revealed an average healing time of approximately 10.79 ± 1.53 weeks, hospitalization lasted 5.64 ± 1.15 days, surgery took approximately 37.86 ± 5.32 minutes, and intraoperative blood loss was 33.29 ± 8.15 ml. One patient experienced irritation from the internal fixation material. At the final follow-up, the Bostman score averaged 28.29 ± 0.83, knee joint flexion reached 131.07° ± 4.88°, all patients achieved full knee extension, and the VAS score was 0.36 ± 0.63. CONCLUSION: Kirschner wire tension band with anchor screw cross-stitch fixation for comminuted inferior patellar pole fractures delivered satisfactory clinical outcomes. This surgical method, characterized by its simplicity and reliability, is a valuable addition to clinical practice.

Long-term results of arthroscopic capsulolabral revision repair for failed anterior shoulder instability repair using suture anchors at a minimum of 10 years follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Arthroscopic revision anterior shoulder instability repair has been proposed, and early clinical results have been promising. However, long-term results after this procedure and the probable risk factors for failure have not been sufficiently discussed in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients who were diagnosed with recurrent anteroinferior shoulder instability after failed Bankart repair, treated with ACRR between September 1998 and November 2003 and able to be contacted were included. Of these patients, 2 were excluded from the study due to the use of SureTak anchors for fixation, and 5 other patients refused to participate in the study due to lack of interest (3 patients) or lack of time (2 patients). The remaining shoulders were clinically examined at a minimum of ten years after surgery via the ASES, Constant, AAOS, Rowe, Dawson and VAS scores for pain and stability. Degenerative arthropathy was assessed with the modified Samilson-Prieto score. RESULTS: All 31 remaining shoulders were evaluated at a mean time of 11.86 years (142.4 months) after surgery. Six patients (19.35%) reported redisolcation after the revision procedure, 4 of whom were affected by a new significant shoulder trauma. The ROWE and Constant scores improved significantly. Moderate to severe dislocation arthropathy was observed in 19.4% of patients. Five patients (16.2%) were not satisfied with the procedure. CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up after ACRR shows predictable results, with a high degree of patient satisfaction, good to excellent patient-reported outcome scores and minimal radiological degenerative changes. However, with an average recurrence rate of 19.3% after 11.86 years, the redislocation rate appears high. With careful patient selection, recurrence rates can be significantly reduced.

Very Early Loading of a Bone-Anchored Hearing System Is Safe.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of early sound processor loading with two separate bone-anchored hearing aid implants 1 to 2 weeks after implantation. Secondary endpoints included registration of any postoperative complications, skin reactions, and any adverse events. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized, noncontrolled, multicenter clinical trial. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Sixty adult patients, eligible for bone-anchored hearing aid surgery, were enrolled. INTERVENTION: Implantation of the bone-anchored hearing aid implants were done using minimally invasive surgery with tissue preservation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were recorded using resonance frequency analysis. Follow-ups were scheduled 5 to 12 days, 4 to 8 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Differences between the lowest ISQ values (ISQ low) over time were analyzed by paired-samples t test with a significance level of 0.05. Skin and soft tissue reactions were assessed according to Holger's classification. RESULTS: Loading time of the Ponto Wide implant was 11.6 ± 1.4 days (SD) in average (median, 12 d; range, 7-19 d). Loading of the Ponto BHX implant was done 9.7 ± 3.5 days (SD) postoperatively (median, 9 d; range, 5-19 d). The implant stability increased significantly during the 12-month study period with both implants. One Ponto BHX implant was lost. Skin and soft tissue reactions were few in both groups. Across all planned follow-up visits, no skin and soft tissue reactions were observed in 86% (Ponto BHX implant) and 85% (Ponto Wide implant). CONCLUSION: Very early loading of sound processors after percutaneous bone-anchored hearing system surgery is safe already 1 to 2 weeks postoperatively.

All-suture anchor size and drill angle influence load to failure in a porcine model of subpectoral biceps tenodesis, a biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND: Tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon is frequently performed in shoulder surgery, and all-suture anchors have become more popular as fixation methods. However, uncertainty still exists regarding the ultimate load to failure of all-suture anchors and the best insertion angle at a cortical humeral insertion point. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics of three types of all-suture anchors frequently used for biceps tenodesis. In addition, the influence of two different insertion angles was observed in a porcine humeri model. METHODS: The ultimate load to failure and failure mode of three types of all-suture anchors (1.6 FiberTak®, 1.9 FiberTak®, 2.6 FiberTak®, Arthrex®) applicable for subpectoral biceps tenodesis were evaluated at 90° and 45° insertion angles in 12 fresh-frozen porcine humeri. The anchors were inserted equally alternated in a randomized manner at three different insertion sites along the bicipital groove, and the suture tapes were knotted around a rod for pullout testing. In total, 36 anchors were evaluated in a universal testing machine (Zwick & Roell). RESULTS: The 2.6 FiberTak® shows higher ultimate loads to failure with a 90° insertion angle (944.0 N ± 169.7 N; 537.0 N ± 308.8 N) compared to the 1.9 FiberTak® (677.8 N ± 57.7 N; 426.3 N ± 167.0 N, p-value: 0.0080) and 1.6 FiberTak® (733.0 N ± 67.6 N; 450.0 N ± 155.8 N, p-value: 0.0018). All anchor types show significantly higher ultimate loads to failure and smaller standard deviations at the 90° insertion angle than at the 45° insertion angle. The major failure mode was anchor pullout. Only the 2.6 FiberTak® anchors showed suture breakage as the major failure mode when placed with a 90° insertion angle. CONCLUSIONS: All three all-suture anchors are suitable fixation methods for subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Regarding our data, we recommend 90° as the optimum insertion angle. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The influence of anchor size and insertion angle of an all-suture anchor should be known by the surgeon for optimizing ultimate loads to failure and for achieving a secure fixation.

Long-Term Outcomes of a Percutaneous Wide-Diameter Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant: A Clinical Evaluation of More than 800 Implants.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the clinical outcomes of 807 percutaneous wide-diameter bone-anchored hearing implants (BAHIs) in 701 patients. In addition, it compares patient groups and examines bone conduction device (BCD) usage. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. Mean follow-up period of 3.8 years. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: All patients implanted with a percutaneous wide-diameter BAHI until December 2020 were included. Patients were divided into age groups, "loading-time" groups, and, if applicable, specific subgroups thought to be at risk for complications postsurgery, e.g., intellectual disability and comorbidities. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Soft tissue reaction, implant survival, revision surgery, and BCD usage. RESULTS: In 9.1% of the 5,188 observations of 807 implants, an adverse soft tissue reaction was reported according to the Holgers' scale. Significantly more (adverse) soft tissue reactions were observed in children and intellectually disabled (ID) patients (p < 0.05). Comorbidity subgroups showed no significant differences in soft tissue reactions. Implant loss percentage, including explantations, was 6.2%. Implant survival was significantly worse in patients with ID (14.1%; p = 0.021). Pediatric age, early loading, or comorbidities did not significantly influence implant survival. At least 592 implants (73.4%) were used for bone conduction hearing, of which 65.4% were used daily. CONCLUSION: Both children and ID patients are more prone to (adverse) soft tissue reactions, ID patients only have a higher risk of implant loss. The rate of implant loss in children seemed to be reduced compared to previous studies and thus more comparable to adults since using wide-diameter implants.

Biomechanical strength of triceps tendon repairs: systematic review and meta-regression analysis of human cadaveric studies.

PURPOSE: It is unclear which triceps tendon repair constructs and techniques produce the strongest biomechanical performance while minimizing the risk of gap formation and repair failure. We aimed to determine associations of construct and technique variables with the biomechanical strength of triceps tendon repairs. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched for peer-reviewed studies on biomechanical strength of triceps tendon repairs in human cadavers. 6 articles met the search criteria. Meta-regression was performed on the pooled dataset (123 specimens). Outcomes of interest included gap formation, failure mode, and ultimate failure load. Covariates were fixation type; number of implants; and number of sutures. Stratification by covariates was performed. We found no association between fixation type and ultimate failure load; however, suture anchor fixation was associated with less gap formation compared with transosseous direct repair (ß = - 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]:- 2.2, - 0.04). A greater number of implants was associated with smaller gap formation (ß = - 0.77; 95% CI: - 1.3, - 0.28) while a greater number of sutures was associated with higher ultimate failure load ( ß= 3; 95% CI: 21, 125). In human cadaveric models, the number of sutures used in triceps tendon repairs may be more important than the fixation type or number of implants for overall strength. If using a transosseous direct repair approach to repair triceps tendon tears, surgeons may choose to use more sutures in their repair in order to balance the risk of larger gap formation when compared to indirect repair techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Extensor tendon rupture and preoperative mri confirmations of suture anchor prolapse: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: While suture anchors are widely used in medical procedures for their advantages, they can sometimes lead to complications, including anchor prolapse. This article presents a unique case of suture anchor prolapse at the base of the distal phalanx of the little finger after extensor tendon rupture reconstruction surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: A 35-year-old male, underwent extensor tendon rupture reconstruction using a non-absorbable suture anchor. After seven years the patient visited our outpatients complaining of stiffness, pain, and protrusion at the surgical site. Initial X-ray imaging suggested suggesting either a fracture of the distal phalanx or tendon adhesion but lacked a definitive diagnosis. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed bone connectivity between the middle and distal phalanges with irregular signal shadow and unclear boundaries while maintaining a regular finger shape. MRI proved superior in diagnosing prolapsed suture anchors, marking the first reported case of its kind. Surgical intervention confirmed MRI findings. CONCLUSIONS: Suture anchor complications, such as prolapse, are a concern in medical practice. This case underscores the significance of MRI for accurate diagnosis and the importance of tailored surgical management in addressing this uncommon complication.

Enhancing spinal bone anchor pull-out resistance with an L-shaped anchor.

The success rate of spinal fusion surgery is mainly determined by the fixation strength of the spinal bone anchors. This study explores the use of an L-shaped spinal bone anchor that is intended to establish a macro-shape lock with the posterior cortical layer of the vertebral body, thereby increasing the pull-out resistance of the anchor. The performance of this L-shaped anchor was evaluated in lumbar vertebra phantoms (L1-L5) across four distinct perpendicular orientations (lateral, medial, superior, and inferior). During the pull-out experiments, the pull-out force, and the displacement of the anchor with respect to the vertebra was measured which allowed the determination of the maximal pull-out force (mean: 123 N ± 25 N) and the initial pull-out force, the initial force required to start motion of the anchor (mean: 23 N ± 16 N). Notably, the maximum pull-out force was observed when the anchor engaged the cortical bone layer. The results demonstrate the potential benefits of utilising a spinal bone anchor featuring a macro-shape lock with the cortical bone layer to increase the pull-out force. Combining the macro shape-lock fixation method with the conventional pedicle screw shows the potential to significantly enhance the fixation strength of spinal bone anchors.

Bone Anchor Fixation in the Repair of Blunt Traumatic Abdominal Wall Hernias: A Western Trauma Association Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Blunt traumatic abdominal wall hernias (TAWHs) are rare but require a variety of operative techniques to repair including bone anchor fixation (BAF) when tissue tears off bony structures. This study aimed to provide a descriptive analysis of BAF technique for blunt TAWH repair. Bone anchor fixation and no BAF repairs were compared, hypothesizing increased hernia recurrence with BAF repair. METHODS: A secondary analysis of the WTA blunt TAWH multicenter study was performed including all patients who underwent repair of their TAWH. Patients with BAF were compared to those with no BAF with bivariate analyses. RESULTS: 176 patients underwent repair of their TAWH with 41 (23.3%) undergoing BAF. 26 (63.4%) patients had tissue fixed to bone, with 7 of those reinforced with mesh. The remaining 15 (36.6%) patients had bridging mesh anchored to bone. The BAF group had a similar age, sex, body mass index, and injury severity score compared to the no BAF group. The time to repair (1 vs 1 days, P = .158), rate of hernia recurrence (9.8% vs 12.7%, P = .786), and surgical site infection (SSI) (12.5% vs 15.6%, P = .823) were all similar between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: This largest series to date found nearly one-quarter of TAWH repairs required BAF. Bone anchor fixation repairs had a similar rate of hernia recurrence and SSI compared to no BAF repairs, suggesting this is a reasonable option for repair of TAWH. However, future prospective studies are needed to compare specific BAF techniques and evaluate long-term outcomes including patient-centered outcomes such as pain and quality of life.