Avaliação das condições higienicossanitárias de abate clandestino de frangos nas feiras e mercados do município de São Luís - MA / Evaluation of the hygienic-sanitary conditions of clandestine slaughter of chickens in the fairs and markets of the municipality of São Luís - MA

A cadeia de produção de carne de frango brasileira é uma das mais importantes do mundo e no Maranhão ocorreu uma expansão do mercado, principalmente em São Luís, com aumento do consumo consideravelmente na região nos últimos anos. Porém, devido à falta de fiscalização e inspeção, nem toda carne de frango que chega a mesa do consumidor é oriunda de estabelecimentos que atendem as normas exigidas. Este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar as condições higienicossanitárias do abate clandestino de 26 boxes em feiras e mercados da cidade de São Luís – MA, através da aplicação de um checklist com itens como: manipuladores, instalações e equipamentos, água, manejo de resíduos e controle integrado de pragas. Os resultados obtidos mostram as péssimas condições de higiene dos estabelecimentos, colocando em risco a qualidade das carnes de frango das feiras e mercados avaliados.

Análise do controverso funcionamento clandestino de avícolas no município de São Paulo

O Brasil possui legislação sanitária rigorosa na produção de alimentos, entretanto questões culturais frequentemente conflitam com as normas, como o abate clandestino de aves. Mesmo com toda a tecnologia empregada e rigor do sistema de inspeção brasileiro ainda verifica-se o consumo de aves provenientes desses abates. O presente estudo objetivou fazer uma análise crítica sobre a existência e funcionamento das "Avícolas" no município de São Paulo, identificar fatores facilitadores e discutir ações para mitigar os riscos sanitários dessa atividade. Utilizou-se abordagem qualitativa para análise de documentos e relatórios gerados nas rotinas de trabalho da Coordenação de Vigilância em Saúde da Prefeitura do Município de São Paulo e legislação vigente acerca do assunto. Estima-se aproximadamente 3900 estabelecimentos com condições estruturais e sanitárias irregulares, porém não há levantamentos e/ou registros. As aves não possuem procedência determinada ou certificações sanitárias. O ambiente é promíscuo e insalubre, situação agravada pela falta de cuidados dos colaboradores. Há eliminação irregular de resíduos do abate, ausência de programas de autocontrole e/ou boas práticas de fabricação. Concluiu-se que as Avícolas são informais, ilegais e clandestinas, impactam negativamente a Saúde Pública pela atividade desenvolvida em desacordo com as normas sanitárias, ambientais e trabalhistas.

Brazil has strict sanitary laws in food production. However, cultural issues often conflict with the rules, such as clandestine slaughter of birds. Even with all the technology employed and the rigor of the Brazilian inspection system, we still observe the consumption of poultry from these slaughters. This study aimed to critically analyze the existence and functioning of poultry in the city of São Paulo, to identify facilitating factors and to discuss actions to mitigate the health risks of this activity. A qualitative approach used to analyze documents and reports generated in the work routines of the Health Surveillance Coordination Oflice of the Municipality of São Paulo and current legislation on the subject. There are approximately 3900 establishments without structural and sanitary conditions are estimated, but there are no surveys and / or records. The birds have no specific provenance or sanitary certifications. The environment is promiscuous and unhealthy, a situation aggravated by the lack of care of employees. There is irregular disposal of slaughter residues, absence of self-control programs and / or good manufacturing practices. It was concluded that Poultry are informal, illegal and clandestine, negatively impact Public Health by the activity developed in disagreement with sanitary, environmental and labor standards.

Assessing Animal Welfare Impacts in the Management of European Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus), European Moles (Talpa europaea) and Carrion Crows (Corvus corone).

Human-wildlife conflict is a global issue. Attempts to manage this conflict impact upon wild animal welfare, an issue receiving little attention until relatively recently. Where human activities harm animal welfare these effects should be minimised where possible. However, little is known about the welfare impacts of different wildlife management interventions, and opinions on impacts vary widely. Welfare impacts therefore need to be assessed objectively. Our objectives were to: 1) establish whether an existing welfare assessment model could differentiate and rank the impacts of different wildlife management interventions (for decision-making purposes); 2) identify and evaluate any additional benefits of making formal welfare assessments; and 3) illustrate issues raised by application of the model. We applied the welfare assessment model to interventions commonly used with rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus), moles (Talpa europaea) and crows (Corvus corone) in the UK. The model ranked interventions for rabbits (least impact first: fencing, head shot, chest shot) and crows (shooting, scaring, live trapping with cervical dislocation). For moles, managing molehills and tunnels scored least impact. Both spring trapping, and live trapping followed by translocation, scored greater impacts, but these could not be compared directly as they scored on different axes of the model. Some rankings appeared counter-intuitive, highlighting the need for objective formal welfare assessments. As well as ranking the humaneness of interventions, the model highlighted future research needs and how Standard Operating Procedures might be improved. The model is a milestone in assessing wildlife management welfare impacts, but our research revealed some limitations of the model and we discuss likely challenges in resolving these. In future, the model might be developed to improve its utility, e.g. by refining the time-scales. It might also be used to reach consensus among stakeholders about relative welfare impacts or to identify ways of improving wildlife management practice in the field.

Impacts of Human Recreation on Brown Bears (Ursus arctos): A Review and New Management Tool.

Increased popularity of recreational activities in natural areas has led to the need to better understand their impacts on wildlife. The majority of research conducted to date has focused on behavioral effects from individual recreations, thus there is a limited understanding of the potential for population-level or cumulative effects. Brown bears (Ursus arctos) are the focus of a growing wildlife viewing industry and are found in habitats frequented by recreationists. Managers face difficult decisions in balancing recreational opportunities with habitat protection for wildlife. Here, we integrate results from empirical studies with expert knowledge to better understand the potential population-level effects of recreational activities on brown bears. We conducted a literature review and Delphi survey of brown bear experts to better understand the frequencies and types of recreations occurring in bear habitats and their potential effects, and to identify management solutions and research needs. We then developed a Bayesian network model that allows managers to estimate the potential effects of recreational management decisions in bear habitats. A higher proportion of individual brown bears in coastal habitats were exposed to recreation, including photography and bear-viewing than bears in interior habitats where camping and hiking were more common. Our results suggest that the primary mechanism by which recreation may impact brown bears is through temporal and spatial displacement with associated increases in energetic costs and declines in nutritional intake. Killings in defense of life and property were found to be minimally associated with recreation in Alaska, but are important considerations in population management. Regulating recreation to occur predictably in space and time and limiting recreation in habitats with concentrated food resources reduces impacts on food intake and may thereby, reduce impacts on reproduction and survival. Our results suggest that decisions managers make about regulating recreational activities in time and space have important consequences for bear populations. The Bayesian network model developed here provides a new tool for managers to balance demands of multiple recreational activities while supporting healthy bear populations.