[Intrauterin infection during the first trimester and on-going pregnancy]. / Cas clinique. Infection intra-utérine au premier trimestre d'une grossesse évolutive.

An intrauterine infection during the first trimester of pregnancy can rapidly lead to bacteremia, with severe consequences for the patient. While these infections are mainly found after a miscarriage or an abortion, the diagnosis is sometimes made while the pregnancy is still in progress. The clinical history and symptoms reported by the patient lead to the suspicion of such a complication. Treatment must be rapid and based on a broad-spectrum antibiotic regimen covering Gram-negative, Gram-positive, aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. As soon as the treatment has been initiated, uterine curettage should be performed to remove the infected material, whether or not foetal cardiac activity is present at the time of diagnosis.

Une infection intra-utérine durant le premier trimestre de la grossesse peut rapidement mener à une bactériémie et avoir des conséquences sévères pour la patiente. Alors que ces infections sont principalement retrouvées après une fausse couche ou une interruption volontaire de grossesse, le diagnostic est parfois posé alors que la grossesse est évolutive. L'histoire clinique et les symptômes rapportés par la patiente permettent de suspecter une telle complication. La prise en charge doit être rapide et repose sur un traitement antibiotique à large spectre couvrant les bactéries Gram négatif, Gram positif, les aérobies et les anaérobies. Dès le traitement instauré, un curetage utérin devra être réalisé afin d'éliminer le matériel infecté, que l'activité cardiaque fœtale soit présente ou non au moment du diagnostic.

Pregnancy Outcomes After Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation of Uterine Leiomyomas Compared With Myomectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy outcomes after laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation and myomectomy. METHODS: The ULTRA (Uterine Leiomyoma Treatment With Radiofrequency Ablation) study is an ongoing multicenter prospective cohort study with longitudinal follow-up up to 5 years comparing outcomes of radiofrequency ablation with myomectomy in premenopausal women older than age 21 years with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas. Participants were queried every 6 months after surgery to assess the incidence of pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: Among 539 women enrolled in ULTRA, a total of 37 participants (mean age at first pregnancy 35.0±4.7 years) conceived 43 times as of March 2023 (22 radiofrequency ablation, 21 myomectomy). The average length of follow-up time after all procedures was 2.5±1.0 years. The baseline miscarriage rate in the study population was 33.3%. In participants who underwent radiofrequency ablation, 9 of 22 pregnancies (40.9%, 95% CI, 20.3-61.5%) ended in first-trimester miscarriage, 11 resulted in live births (50.0%, 95% CI, 29.1-70.9%), one resulted fetal death at 30 weeks of gestation, and one resulted in uterine rupture during miscarriage treatment with misoprostol 10 weeks after radiofrequency ablation. Among the live births in the radiofrequency ablation group, 45.5% were by vaginal delivery. In the myomectomy group, 9 of 21 pregnancies (42.9%, 95% CI, 21.7-64.0%) ended in first-trimester miscarriage and 12 resulted in live births (57.1%, 95% CI, 36.0-78.3%). There were no significant differences in the likelihood of live birth or miscarriage between the study groups. CONCLUSION: Full-term pregnancy and vaginal delivery are achievable after radiofrequency ablation of leiomyomas. However, in this interim analysis, the miscarriage rate in both radiofrequency ablation and myomectomy groups was higher than expected for women in this age group. Long-term data collection in the ongoing ULTRA study aims to further understand pregnancy outcomes after radiofrequency ablation compared with myomectomy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT0210094.

Intrauterine adhesion in ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration (USG-MVA) versus electric vacuum aspiration (EVA): a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Intrauterine adhesion (IUA) can arise as a potential complication following uterine surgery, as the surgical procedure may damage the endometrial stratum basalis. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the occurrence of IUA in women who underwent ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration (USG-MVA) versus electric vacuum aspiration (EVA) for managing first-trimester miscarriage. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled trial conducted at a university-affiliated tertiary hospital. Chinese women aged 18 years and above who had a delayed or incomplete miscarriage of ≤ 12 weeks of gestation were recruited in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the Prince of Wales. Recruited participants received either USG-MVA or EVA for the management of their miscarriage and were invited for a hysteroscopic assessment to evaluate the incidence of IUA between 6 and 20 weeks after the surgery. Patients were contacted by phone at 6 months to assess their menstrual and reproductive outcomes. RESULTS: 303 patients underwent USG-MVA or EVA, of whom 152 were randomised to 'USG-MVA' and 151 patients to the 'EVA' group. Out of the USG-MVA group, 126 patients returned and completed the hysteroscopic assessment, while in the EVA group, 125 patients did the same. The incidence of intrauterine adhesion (IUA) was 19.0% (24/126) in the USG-MVA group and 32.0% (40/125) in the EVA group, showing a significant difference (p < 0.02) between the two groups. No significant difference in the menstrual outcomes at 6 months postoperatively between the two groups but more patients had miscarriages in the EVA group with IUA. CONCLUSIONS: IUAs are a possible complication of USG-MVA. However, USG-MVA is associated with a lower incidence of IUA postoperatively at 6-20 weeks. USG-MVA is a feasible, effective, and safe alternative surgical treatment with less IUA for the management of first-trimester miscarriage. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the Centre for Clinical Research and Biostatics- Clinical Trials Registry (CCRBCTR), which is a partner registry of the WHO Primary Registry-Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR) (Unique Trial Number: ChiCTR1900023198 with the first trial registration date on 16/05/2019).

Incidence of intrauterine adhesion after ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration (USG-MVA) for first-trimester miscarriages: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration (USG-MVA) is a feasible and effective outpatient treatment to treat early pregnancy loss. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study at a university-affiliated hospital. All women undergoing either a USG-MVA or electric vacuum aspiration (EVA) were invited to return 3-6 months later for follow-up at which women completed a questionnaire to document their post-evacuation menstrual and reproductive history, and underwent a hysteroscopy if they were not pregnant. The severity of intrauterine adhesion (IUA), if present, was graded (Stage I-III) according to the American fertility society classification. RESULTS: A total of 292 women had a hysteroscopy after their initial surgical evacuation, USG-MVA 169(57.9%) versus EVA 123(42.1%). Women undergoing EVA as opposed to a USG-MVA had a 12.9% higher incidence of IUA (24.1% vs. 37.0%, p = 0.042) equivalent to 1.84 times higher risk (95% CI 1.01-3.34; p = 0.048). Women having EVA continued to show an increased but not statistically significant trend towards an increased risk of IUA after adjusting for the type of miscarriage (aOR = 1.3; 95% CI 0.66-2.50; p = 0.46). CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in their reproductive outcomes and fewer women post-USG-MVA complained of hypomenorrhea. IUA may still occur in women undergoing USG-MVA but it is lower than the rate in women undergoing EVA. Clinical trials registry The trial was registered with the Centre for Clinical Research and Biostatistics - Clinical Trials Registry (CCRBCTR), a partner registry of the WHO Primary Registry-Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR) with a Unique Trial Number: CUHK_CCRB00541 on 22 Dec 2016.

[Impact of Endometriosis on the Therapeutic Effect of Hysteroscopic Fallopian Tube Catheterization Combined With Laparoscopy in Infertile Patients With Proximal Tubal Obstruction].

Objective: To investigate the impact of endometriosis on the therapeutic effect of hysteroscopic fallopian tube catheterization combined with laparoscopy in infertile patients with proximal tubal obstruction. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent hysteroscopic fallopian tube catheterization combined with laparoscopy for infertility caused by proximal fallopian tube obstruction between January 19, 2016 and March 20, 2020 at the Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University. During the operation, hydrotubation was performed to verify whether there was proximal tubal obstruction. Then, the patients were categorized into an endometriosis group and a non-endometriosis group according to whether their proximal tubal obstruction was combined with endometriosis. The baseline data were balanced by propensity score matching and the rate of successful surgical unblocking of proximal tubal obstruction in infertile patients by hysteroscopic fallopian tube catheterization combined with laparoscopy was calculated. Treating cases lost to follow-up in both groups as non-pregnant cases according to the principle of intention-to-treat analysis, we followed up the pregnancy outcomes after surgery. The primary indicators included overall successful surgical unblocking rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and spontaneous pregnancy rate, while the secondary indicators included live birth rate, miscarriage rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, and the mean time to spontaneous pregnancy after surgery. The primary indicators included overall successful surgical unblocking rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and spontaneous conception rate, while the secondary indicators included live birth rate, miscarriage rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, and the mean time to spontaneous pregnancy after surgery. Results: After propensity score matching, 113 cases were included in each of the two groups, with the overall successful surgical unblocking rate being 72.6%. The successful surgical unblocking rate of patients in the endometriosis group was higher than that of the non-endometriosis group, with the difference being statistically significant (78.8% vs. 66.4%, P<0.05). A total of 38 patients were lost after follow-up matching. Postoperative follow-up was performed to date and, through intention-to-treat analysis, the spontaneous conception rate was found to be higher in the endometriosis group than that in the non-endometriosis group (44.2% vs. 30.1%, P<0.05), while the mean time to spontaneous pregnancy after surgery was shorter in the endometriosis group than that in the non-endometriosis group (46 months vs. 53 months, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, miscarriage rate, and ectopic pregnancy rate between the endometriosis group and the non-endometriosis group ( P>0.05). Conclusion: When infertility caused by proximal tubal obstruction is combined with endometriosis, performing hysteroscopic fallopian tube catheterization combined with laparoscopy contributes to the improvement of reproduction outcomes.

Hystero-embryoscopy: evaluation and evacuation of spontaneous missed abortions.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the steps for hystero-embryoscopic evaluation of a 7-week spontaneous missed abortion and evacuation of the products of conception. Illustrate the surgical technique and highlight its advantages in improving the evaluation of spontaneous missed abortions. DESIGN: Video case presentation and demonstration of surgical technique. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENT(S): The patient provided consent for the video and its publication. INTERVENTION(S): Following vaginoscopy, the cervix was approached without prior blind cervical dilation. Navigation from the endocervix to the endometrial cavity was performed using a 2.9-mm diameter hysteroscope. The endometrial cavity was thoroughly inspected revealing an intact gestational sac and submucosal fibroids. An operative grasper was introduced, the chorion and amnion were penetrated, and embryoscopy was performed. In-flow was reduced for external morphological inspection of the embryo, which was then grasped and retrieved. The procedure was continued by introducing of a 26-french bipolar resectoscope, after which the products of conception were excised without electricity and sent for histologic and genetic analyses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): This procedure allowed for proper embryonic evaluation and hysteroscopic evacuation of products of conception was successfully performed. RESULT(S): Cytogenic analysis of this case revealed a female embryo with trisomy 15. No maternal and fetal cell admixture was noted in the analysis, allowing a precise diagnosis. CONCLUSION(S): Hystero-embryoscopy is a valuable diagnostic and therapeutic procedure for cases of missed abortion. It may reveal embryonic morphological abnormalities, expand the diagnostic spectrum in the evaluation of pregnancy loss, and avoid potential complications from blind curettage.

The comparative analysis of laparoscopic or transvaginal cerclage in pregnancies with cervical insufficiency: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic cervical cerclage by laparoscopy in pregnant women versus transvaginal way. DESIGN: Retrospective, monocentric cohort study was performed. SETTING: The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. PATIENTS: Cases with cervical insufficiency (defined by previous history of painless second or early third trimester pregnancy loss/losses) were selected. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic or transvaginal cerclage were conducted. The maternal information and the neonatal data were collected and compared. The pregnancy outcomes including the incidence of full-term labor and gestational weeks at delivery were defined as the primary outcomes. Neonatal survival and birth weight, neonatal complications were evaluated as the secondary outcomes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Totally 36 twin pregnant cases and 82 singleton pregnant cases were managed with cerclage, either trans-laparoscopy (totally 78 cases) or transvaginal (totally 40 cases). Demographic characteristics showed no significant differences. Cases in laparoscopic group had a prolonged gestational age at delivery (36.43 ± 0.93 weeks and 33.60 ± 2.78 weeks, respectively, P < 0.001), a higher incidence of full-term labor (60.26% vs 42.50%, P = 0.05) with no significant difference of perinatal mortality (P = 0.661). Meanwhile, higher incidence of normal birth weight infants (88.46% vs 67.50%, P = 0.007) was shown in laparoscopic group with no more complications such as the cases of neonatal with Apgar < 7 (P = 0.296), and the incidence of NICU admission (P = 0.237). Besides, LTC showed good efficiency on VTC in the incidence of full-term labor: HR 0.24 (95% CI 0.070-0.85), P < 0.001. While LSC showed the similar efficiency on VSC: HR 0.734 (95% CI 0.36-1.49), P = 0.857, showing that cases with twin pregnancy may benefit more from laparoscopic cerclage. CONCLUSIONS: The comparative effect between laparoscopic and transvaginal cerclage in pregnant women showed that laparoscopic cerclage may be a relatively effective and safety prophylactic way for cervical insufficiency. This would be an acceptable and safe replace for traditional transvaginal cervical cerclage.

Does hyaluronic acid gel reduce intrauterine adhesions after dilation and curettage in women with miscarriage? A Multicentric randomized controlled trial (HYFACO Study).

BACKGROUND: Miscarriage is a frequent problem that requires dilation and curettage in 30% of cases. This routine surgery may lead to intrauterine adhesions and severe infertility. Hyaluronic acid gel is known to reduce intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic surgery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the rate of intrauterine adhesions after dilation and curettage for miscarriage with and without hyaluronic acid gel. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicentric (9 hospitals in France), prospective, open-label randomized trial. Patients who had a miscarriage between weeks 7 and 14 of gestation, required dilation and curettage, and wanted another pregnancy were eligible for the study. Women were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to surgery alone (control group) or surgery with intrauterine instillation of hyaluronic acid gel (gel group). An office hysteroscopy was planned at 6 to 8 weeks after surgery. The primary endpoint was the rate of intrauterine adhesions during this office follow-up hysteroscopy. Two different follow-up fertility surveys were sent at 6 months and 1 year after the end of the intervention, respectively. RESULTS: Among the 343 patients who had curettage, 278 had hysteroscopy. After multiple imputation, the rate of intrauterine adhesions was lower in the gel group than in the control group (9.1% vs 18.4%, respectively; P=.0171). Among the 110 responders to the surveys, the overall pregnancy rate at 12 months after surgery was 64.5% (71/110), and similar in both groups (57.4% [27/47] in the control group vs 69.8% [44/63] in the gel group; P=.1789). CONCLUSION: Intrauterine instillation of hyaluronic acid gel reduces the rate of intrauterine adhesions in women treated with dilation and curettage for miscarriage.

Expectant vs medical management for retained products of conception after medical termination of pregnancy: a randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the rise of medical treatments for the termination of pregnancy, to date, no prospective trial has evaluated the efficacy of misoprostol in treating retained products of conception after induced termination of pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare medical management with misoprostol with expectant management for retained products of conception after first-trimester medical termination of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: This was an open-label randomized controlled trial conducted at a university-affiliated tertiary medical center. Consenting consecutive women who underwent a routine 3-week follow-up evaluation after medical termination of pregnancy and had a sonographic suspicion of retained products of conception, defined as sonographic evidence of intrauterine remnant (>12 mm) with a positive Doppler flow, were recruited. The participants were randomized into a medical treatment group (800 µg of sublingually administered misoprostol) or expectant management. They all underwent repeat ultrasound scans every 2 weeks until a maximum of 6 weeks, and those suspected of persistent retained products of conception were referred to operative hysteroscopy. The primary endpoint was successful treatment defined as no need for surgical intervention because of persistent retained products of conception within 8 weeks from pregnancy termination. RESULTS: There was no marked difference in demographic characteristics between the study groups. The median sonographically demonstrated retained product length was 20 mm (interquartile range, 17-25) in the medically managed group compared with 20 mm (interquartile range, 17-26) in the expectantly managed group (P=.733). Treatment succeeded in 42 of 68 women (61.8%) in the medically managed group compared with 36 of 63 women (57.1%) in the expectantly managed group (relative risk, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.70; P=.590). There was no difference in adverse outcomes between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: There was no clinically meaningful advantage for medical treatment with misoprostol compared with expectant management after first-trimester medical termination of pregnancy in women with suspected retained products of conception. Surgical intervention can be avoided in up to 60% of women who are managed expectantly for 8 weeks of follow-up.

Ultrasound-guided Manual Vacuum Aspiration is an optimal method for obtaining products of conception from early pregnancy loss for cytogenetic testing.

OBJECTIVE: The culture failure rate of conventional karyotyping in products of conception evacuated from early pregnancy loss by traditional electrical vacuum aspiration and/or dilation & curettage remains high. We aim to determine whether obtaining products of conception from early pregnancy loss via another evacuation approach, ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration, could decrease the culture failure rate of karyotyping. METHODS: For patients with early pregnancy loss, ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration (Case group) and traditional electrical vacuum aspiration and/or dilation & curettage (Control group) were applied as surgical methods for pregnancy loss management respectively. The evacuated products of conception were subjected to cytogenetic karyotyping analysis. The primary outcome was the culture failure rate of karyotyping. Secondary outcomes included the chromosomal abnormality spectrum, maternal cell contamination, and complications from the manual vacuum aspiration procedure. RESULTS: For the case group, 132 products of conception were genetically analyzed by conventional karyotyping. The culture failure rate was significantly lower than that of the control cohort (2.3% vs 7.4%, p = 0.027). 65.2% of cases were abnormal within the detection scope of karyotyping. The euploid female to male ratio was 0.82 (18:22), suggesting a lower likelihood of maternal cell contamination. The efficacy in achieving complete evacuation was 99.6%. There were no significant complications from the procedure. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration approach significantly decreased the culture failure rate of karyotyping and decreased maternal cell contamination tendency, enabling a high and accurate cytogenetic diagnosis. It is especially crucial when the cytogenetic analysis is required in the early pregnancy loss clinics.

Management of incomplete and missed spontaneous abortions: a cohort study of trends in Calgary emergency departments.

OBJECTIVES: Incomplete and missed spontaneous abortion cases often first present to the emergency department (ED), where they can be managed operatively via dilation and curettage (D&C) or non-operatively through medical or expectant management. The primary objective of this study was to determine how rates of operative management have changed over time across Calgary EDs. The secondary objective was to assess correlates of effectiveness and potential drivers in management including gynecological consults, ED return visits requiring admission, and subsequent D&Cs. METHODS: Sunrise Clinical Manager (electronic medical system) was accessed to collect data for patients who presented to a Calgary ED with an incomplete or missed spontaneous abortion from 2014 to 2019. Patients requiring resuscitation and those with complications were excluded. Return to care for D&C and ED revisits requiring admission were used as a proxy for failed non-operative management. Trends in management are reported using 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Of the 3845 patients included, 1110 (28.9%) received a D&C on initial ED visit. The remaining 2735 (71.1%) were initially managed non-operatively. Rates of D&Cs decreased 11.6% from 2014 to 2019, 95% CI (6.5%, 16.8%). There was minimal change in the rates of gynecological consults, ED returns requiring admission, and returns to care resulting in D&Cs over time. CONCLUSIONS: The management of incomplete and missed spontaneous abortions has shifted toward non-operative management over 6 years in Calgary. As this is not associated with increased ED returns requiring admission or subsequent D&Cs, the shift appears to be appropriate. As gynecological consults were consistent over time, further knowledge translation around non-operative spontaneous abortion management may be useful for ED physicians.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Les cas d'avortement spontané incomplets et manqués sont souvent les premiers à se présenter au service d'urgence (SU), où ils peuvent être gérés opérationnellement par dilatation et curetage (D&C) ou non opératoire par une prise en charge médicale ou d'attente. Le principal objectif de cette étude était de déterminer comment les taux de prise en charge opératoire ont changé au fil du temps dans les SU de Calgary. L'objectif secondaire était d'évaluer les corrélats de l'efficacité et les facteurs potentiels de la prise en charge, notamment les consultations gynécologiques, les visites de retour aux urgences nécessitant une admission et les D&C ultérieures. MéTHODES: Sunrise Clinical Manager (système médical électronique) a été consulté pour recueillir les données des patients qui se sont présentés à un service d'urgence de Calgary avec un avortement spontané incomplet ou manqué entre 2014 et 2019. Les patients nécessitant une réanimation et ceux présentant des complications ont été exclus. Le retour aux soins pour une D&C et les nouvelles visites aux urgences nécessitant une admission ont été utilisés comme indicateur de l'échec de la prise en charge non opératoire. Les tendances en matière de gestion sont signalées en utilisant des intervalles de confiance à 95%. RéSULTATS: Sur les 3 845 patients inclus, 1 110 (28,9%) ont reçu un D&C lors de la première visite à l'urgence. Les 2 735 autres (71,1%) ont été initialement pris en charge de manière non chirurgicale. Les taux de D&C ont diminué de 11,6% entre 2014 et 2019, IC à 95% (6,5%, 16,8%). Il y a eu un changement minime dans les taux de consultations gynécologiques, de retours aux urgences nécessitant une admission et de retours aux soins entraînant des D&C au fil du temps. CONCLUSIONS: La prise en charge des avortements spontanés incomplets et manqués a évolué vers une prise en charge non opératoire en 6 ans à Calgary. Comme cela n'est pas associé à une augmentation des retours à l'urgence nécessitant une admission ou des D&C ultérieurs, le changement semble être approprié. Les consultations gynécologiques étant constantes au fil du temps, une application plus poussée des connaissances sur la prise en charge des avortements spontanés non opératoires pourrait être utile aux médecins des urgences.

Impact of anesthetic agents on the amount of bleeding during dilatation and evacuation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Patients undergo dilatation and evacuation for abortion or miscarriage. However, bleeding is sometimes problematic. Despite reports on the association between volatile anesthetics and increased bleeding during the procedure, firm evidence is lacking. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effects of volatile anesthetics and propofol on the amount of bleeding in patients undergoing dilatation and evacuation. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of four databases, namely PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics), from their respective inception to April 2021. Moreover, we searched two trial registration sites. The inclusion criterion was randomized controlled trials of patients who underwent dilatation and evacuation under general anesthesia using volatile anesthetics or propofol. The primary outcome was the amount of perioperative bleeding. The mean difference of the bleeding was combined using a random-effects model. The I2 statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. We assessed risk of bias with Cochrane domains. We controlled type I and II errors due to sparse data and repetitive testing with Trial Sequential Analysis. We assessed the quality of evidence with GRADE. RESULTS: Five studies were included in the systematic review. The amount of bleeding was compared in four studies and was higher in the volatile anesthetic group, with a mean difference of 164.7 ml (95% confidence interval, 43.6 to 285.7; p = 0.04). Heterogeneity was considerable, with an I2 value of 97%. Two studies evaluated the incidence of significant bleeding, which was significantly higher in the volatile anesthetic group (RR, 2.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-5.63; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Choosing propofol over volatile anesthetics during dilatation and evacuation might reduce bleeding and the incidence of excessive bleeding. However, the quality of the evidence was very low. This necessitates further trials with a low risk of bias. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42019120873).

Womens experience of Manual Vacuum Aspiration: An Irish perspective.

OBJECTIVE: Manual Vacuum Aspiration (MVA) is a well-established management option for early pregnancy loss or early termination of pregnancy. MVA is performed as out-patient surgical procedure using local anaesthetic whereby aspiration of uterine contents is achieved through use of a hand-held negative pressure syringe. Ireland's first MVA service was established at the Rotunda Hospital Dublin in April 2020,. The purpose of this study was to gather feedback from women who had undergone MVA in the unit. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective mixed methods study of women attending for uterine aspiration under local anaesthetic from July to October 2020 in the unit. Consenting women were contacted one week following MVA via telephone. The survey conducted consisted of structured closed questions along with open-ended questions, to assess womens satisfaction in relation to all aspects of the MVA service. RESULTS: Nineteen women took part in the study, a response rate of 86.4%. Participants reported feeling well informed prior to attending for MVA. Prior to the procedure, pain expectation scores were high but actual reported pain scores were much lower. Although some participants did find MVA uncomfortable, the fact the procedure was very quick and the side effects so minimal generally negated this. The location and set up of the clinic scored highly among participants as did the staff of the clinic. Overall satisfaction with the MVA service was high with 84.2% of participants reporting they would opt again for MVA in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Women living in Ireland are interested and agreeable with having Manual Vacuum Aspiration as an available option for management of early pregnancy complications. Consideration should be given to expansion of MVA services nationally.

Survey on spontaneous miscarriage and induced abortion surgery safety at less than 12 weeks of gestation in Japan.

AIM: In Japan, dilatation and curettage (D&C) is a common procedure for spontaneous miscarriage and induced abortion, and its safety has long been an issue. Electric vacuum aspiration (EVA) is also common, but manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) was introduced recently, with medical abortions using mifepristone or misoprostol which are not yet legally accepted. This nationwide retrospective study surveyed the surgical methods and complications associated with spontaneous miscarriage and induced abortion at less than 12 weeks of gestation in Japan to assess their safety, in comparison with a similar survey for induced abortions in 2012. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to 4176 facilities with a license for induced abortion surgeries in 2019. The questions included were the methods used, number of spontaneous miscarriages and induced abortions, and number of complications (uterine perforation, incomplete abortion, and gross bleeding requiring blood transfusion). RESULTS: Responses were received from 1706 facilities (40.9%). Although EVA with sharp curettage was the most common surgical method, which was used for 11 953 spontaneous miscarriages (28.9%) and 24 045 induced abortions (37.3%), the most common surgical method per facility was D&C, and the rates of D&C for spontaneous miscarriages (38.4%) and induced abortions (44.7%) performed in general hospitals were significantly higher than those in clinics (24.1% and 22.0%, respectively). There was no significant difference in the complication incidence rate among surgical methods for spontaneous miscarriages. However, in induced abortion surgery, the total complication and incomplete abortion incidence rates for D&C were significantly higher than those for EVA without sharp curettage (47/15 162 [0.31%] vs. 29/18 693 [0.16%], p = 0.00362, 45/15 162 [0.30%] vs. 27/18 693 [0.14%], p = 0.00285, respectively). There was no significant difference in the complication incidence rate between MVA and other surgical methods for each abortion surgery. CONCLUSION: In Japan, especially in general hospitals, D&C is still widely used for miscarriage and induced abortion surgery. Its complication-incidence rates significantly decreased compared with that of the nationwide survey in 2012, but were still significantly higher than EVA without sharp curettage. Few facilities used MVA, but its complication rate was comparable with those of other surgical methods.

A Pilot Study of Guided Conservative Hysteroscopic Evacuation of Early Miscarriage.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate initial feasibility and experience with guided hysteroscopic morcellation for uterine evacuation of early miscarriage. DESIGN: A prospective pilot study of 10 cases. SETTING: A tertiary university hospital in Israel. PATIENTS: Women with confirmed early miscarriage at a gestational age of below 10 weeks from the last menstrual period. INTERVENTIONS: From May 2020 to October 2020, the hysteroscopic TruClear tissue removal system (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) was used for evacuation of early miscarriage in 10 women. The procedures were recorded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data including the length of the procedure, visibility, complete evacuation, bleeding, complications, and follow-up ultrasonography (US) were recorded. The mean duration of the procedure was 24 minutes. Complete evacuation was recorded in all cases. No adverse events were recorded in any of the 10 procedures. Normal uterine cavity without evidence of retained products of conception was documented in follow-up evaluation by US in all cases. Four patients underwent a follow-up office hysteroscopy that demonstrated a normal cavity without evidence of adhesions. In 4 cases (40%), an additional suction curettage was performed immediately after the hysteroscopic procedure owing to obscured visibility or an abnormal US scan at the end of the procedure. However, retained products of conception were found in only 1 of these 4 suction specimens (25%). CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopic morcellation under vision seems to be a safe and feasible technique for management of early missed abortion. This method may have potential as an innovative treatment of miscarriage in selected cases. Further studies are needed to refine the indications and the surgical technique.

Conception rates after medical versus surgical evacuation of early miscarriage.

OBJECTIVE: To compare short-term fertility rates after medical and surgical management of early miscarriage. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Academic tertiary-care medical center. PATIENT(S): A total of 203 patients were enrolled between June 2017 and May 2018, comprising 106 surgical evacuations and 97 medical evacuations. INTERVENTION(S): Either surgical or medical evacuation of the uterine cavity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Conception rates 6 months after miscarriage. RESULT(S): Conception rates 6 months after miscarriage among women who had attempted to become pregnant were similar between the medically and surgically evacuated groups (68.0% vs. 65.1%). There were no significant differences in background characteristics between the groups, apart from younger age and earlier gestational age among the medically treated group. There was no difference in the proportion of women using assisted reproductive technologies between the medically and surgically managed groups (15.5% vs. 12.6%, respectively). The median time-to-conception was 4 ± 2 months in both groups. Cumulative pregnancy rate 12 months after pregnancy loss, live birth rate, and repeat miscarriage rate also were similar between groups. CONCLUSION(S): Modality of uterine evacuation after early miscarriage does not affect short-term fertility outcomes.

Reproductive performance of women with and without intrauterine adhesions following recurrent dilatation and curettage for miscarriage: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Are the long-term reproductive outcomes following recurrent dilatation and curettage (D&C) for miscarriage in women with identified and treated intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) comparable to women without IUAs. SUMMARY ANSWER: Reproductive outcomes in women with identified and treated IUAs following recurrent D&C for miscarriage are impaired compared to women without IUAs; fewer ongoing pregnancies and live births are achieved with a prolonged time to a live birth. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The Prevention of Adhesions Post Abortion (PAPA) study showed that application of auto-crosslinked hyaluronic acid (ACP) gel, an absorbable barrier in women undergoing recurrent D&C for miscarriage resulted in a lower rate of IUAs, 13% versus 31% (relative risk 0.43, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.83), lower mean adhesion score and significant less moderate to severe IUAs. It is unclear what the impact is of IUAs on long-term reproductive performance. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a follow-up of the PAPA study, a multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the application of ACP gel in women undergoing recurrent D&C for miscarriage. All included women received a diagnostic hysteroscopy 8-12 weeks after randomization to evaluate the uterine cavity and for adhesiolysis if IUAs were present. Here, we present the reproductive outcomes in women with identified and treated IUAs versus women without IUAs, 46 months after randomization. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Between December 2011 and July 2015, 152 women with a first-trimester miscarriage with at least one previous D&C, were randomized for D&C alone or D&C with immediate intrauterine application of ACP gel. Participants were approached at least 30 months after randomization to evaluate reproductive performance, obstetric and neonatal outcomes and cycle characteristics. Additionally, the medical files of all participants were reviewed. Main outcome was ongoing pregnancy. Outcomes of subsequent pregnancies, time to conception and time to live birth were also recorded. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In women pursuing a pregnancy, 14/24 (58%) ongoing pregnancies were recorded in women with identified and treated IUAs versus 80/89 (90%) ongoing pregnancies in women without IUAs odds ratio (OR) 0.18 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.50, P-value <0.001). Documented live birth was also lower in women with IUAs; 13/24 (54%) with versus 75/89 (84%) without IUAs, OR 0.22 (95% CI: 0.08 to-0.59, P-value 0.004). The median time to conception was 7 months in women with identified and treated IUAs versus 5 months in women without IUAs (hazard ratio (HR) 0.84 (95% CI 0.54 to 1.33)) and time to conception leading to a live birth 15 months versus 5.0 months (HR 0.54 (95% CI: 0.30 to 0.97)). In women with identified and treated IUAs, premature deliveries were recorded in 3/16 (19%) versus 4/88 (5%) in women without IUAs, P-value 0.01. Complications were recorded in respectively 12/16 (75%) versus 26/88 (30%), P-value 0.001. No differences were recorded in mean birth weight between the groups. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: In the original PAPA study, randomization was applied for ACP gel application. Comparing women with and without IUAs is not in line with the randomization and therefore confounding of the results cannot be excluded. IUAs, if visible during routine hysteroscopy after randomization were removed as part of the study protocol; the influence of IUAs on reproductive outcome may therefore be underestimated. Women undergoing a recurrent D&C for miscarriage were included, a specific group likely to generate clinically significant adhesions. The findings should therefore not be generalized to all women undergoing D&C for miscarriage. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: As IUAs have an impact on reproductive performance, even after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis, primary prevention is essential. Expectative and medical management should therefore be considered as serious alternatives for D&C in women with a miscarriage. In case D&C is necessary, application of ACP gel should be considered. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The original PAPA study (NTR 3120) was an investigator initiated study that was funded by the Foundation for scientific investigation in Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the Saint Lucas Andreas Hospital (currently renamed OLVG Oost), SWOGA. The syringes containing ACP gel were received from Anika Therapeutics, the manufacturer of Hyalobarrier® Gel Endo. The current follow-up study was also an investigator-initiated study without funding. The funder and sponsor had no role in the design of this follow-up study, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, trial design, patient recruitment, writing of the report or any aspect pertinent to the study. ABH, RAL, JAFH and JWRT have no conflict to declare. HAMB reports being a member of safety board research Womed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands Trial Register NTR 3120.

Safety and efficacy of manual vacuum suction compared with conventional dilatation and sharp curettage and electric vacuum aspiration in surgical treatment of miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization does not recommend dilatation and sharp curettage (D&C) for the surgical treatment of miscarriage during the first trimester because this may cause Asherman's syndrome due to endometrial damage; therefore, suction remains the primary treatment option. While manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) has been widely used since the 1990s outside Japan, the use of an MVA device (Women's MVA system) was approved in Japan in October 2015. Here, we examined the efficacy of the MVA kit in women surgically treated for miscarriage. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2014 and 2018 at the International University of Health and Welfare Hospital in Japan. Women who underwent surgical treatment for miscarriage within 12 weeks of pregnancy were identified and enrolled in the study. A total of 404 women were included who underwent the following procedures: 121 D&C, 123 electric vacuum aspiration (EVA), and 160 MVA. For each participant, the duration of surgery, amount of bleeding, amount of anesthetic used, incomplete abortion requiring repeat procedures, and intraoperative/postoperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The duration of surgery was 13.7 ± 7.2, 11.2 ± 4.2, and 6.9 ± 4.3 min in the D&C, EVA, and MVA groups, respectively (p = 1.00). The amount of anesthetic used was not significantly different among all groups. Bleeding of ≥ 100 mL was confirmed in three (2.4%), one (0.8%), and one (0.6%) patient(s) in the D&C, EVA, and MVA groups, respectively (p = 0.50). Incomplete abortion was identified in three (2.4%), two (1.6%), and one (0.6%) patient(s) in the D&C, EVA, and MVA groups, respectively (p = 0.61). However, severe intraoperative/postoperative complications were not observed in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment for miscarriage performed using the MVA kit has safety and efficacy similar to those of conventional methods, such as D&C and EVA.

A four step strategy for robot assisted abdominal cerclage placement prior to pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate a simple, stepwise strategy for robot-assisted abdominal cerclage placement before pregnancy. DESIGN: Demonstrative video presentation. Surgical footage surrounding a case report is used to describe a four-step technique for robot-assisted abdominal cerclage placement in women with recurrent pregnancy loss or other anatomic variants before pregnancy. This video article was reviewed by the Investigational Review Board and further investigation was waived because the study was "not considered human subject research." SETTING: Tertiary medical center. PATIENT(S): A 38-year-old G4P0220 (Gestations: 4, Term deliveries: 0, Preterm deliveries: 2, Abortions: 2, Living children: 0) with a history of two second trimester losses who had failed a prior history-indicated transvaginal cerclage (Fig. 1). INTERVENTION(S): The patient underwent an uncomplicated robot-assisted abdominal cerclage using a four-step strategy: Step 1, create the bladder flap; Step 2, identify pertinent anatomy; Step 3, place the cerclage; and Step 4, hysteroscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Intraoperative technique presenting a four-step method to ensure successful robot-assisted abdominal cerclage placement. RESULT(S): Robot-assisted abdominal cerclage is a safe, viable alternative to traditional abdominal cerclage placed via laparotomy. This video outlines four critical steps to facilitate placement and decrease patient morbidity. This patient did well operatively without increased blood loss or operative time and was discharged home on postoperative day 1. She went on to have a successful future pregnancy and currently is scheduled for an elective cesarean section at term. CONCLUSION(S): Abdominal cerclages significantly improve pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in women who previously have failed transvaginal cerclage. Robot-assisted abdominal cerclage placement allows a minimally invasive approach with enhanced dexterity and better visualization for the surgeon compared with conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy, as well as decreased pain and shorter recovery time for patients. This video demonstrates placement of a robot-assisted abdominal cerclage in a patient with recurrent pregnancy loss using a simple four-step strategy to ensure successful, correct, and easy placement. To our knowledge, this is the first video demonstrating a stepwise approach to robot-assisted abdominal cerclage placement.