Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 695
Filtrar
1.
Clin Ter ; 175(Suppl 1(4)): 117-120, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39054994

RESUMO

Background: The voluntary interruption of pregnancy (VIP) remains one of the most contentious issues worldwide, subject to different legal frameworks and cultural interpretations. Access to VIP is considered a fundamental right for women, recognized by international organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and supported by the United Nations. It is estimated that 40-50 million abortions are performed each year, of which about 75% are in developing countries. IVG is legal in only 25 countries, while in the others, it is severely restricted or illegal, leading to an increase in risky and illegal practices. Methods: We consulted government and ministerial websites in European countries to gather data on current abortion laws. In addition, scientific articles and legislative documents compare regulations across some countries, especially from 2020 to today, analyzing differences, similarities and implications. Percentage data on the number of abortions in several European countries, including Italy, were analyzed. Conclusion: Our analysis revealed significant differences in abortion laws between European countries. In many countries, abortion is allowed at the request of the woman within a certain gestational age limit, which typically ranges between 10 and 24 weeks. However, in some countries, the restrictions are much stricter, with limitations making access to legal abortion very difficult or impossible. In conclu-sion, the Italian experience highlights the importance of considering local sociocultural dynamics in shaping IVG policies and highlights the need for an evidence-based approach to guarantee women right to reproductive health internationally, surrounding reproductive rights, gender equality, and public health policy.


Assuntos
Aborto Legal , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Itália , Europa (Continente) , Aborto Legal/legislação & jurisprudência , Aborto Legal/estatística & dados numéricos , Aborto Induzido/legislação & jurisprudência , Aborto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
PLoS One ; 19(7): e0305701, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38985688

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: During the 1970s the Nordic countries liberalized their abortion laws. OBJECTIVE: We assessed epidemiological trends for induced abortion on all Nordic countries, considered legal similarities and diversities, effects of new medical innovations and changes in practical and legal provisions during the subsequent years. METHODS: New legislation strengthened surveillance of induced abortion in all countries and mandated hospitals that performed abortions to report to national abortion registers. Published data from the Nordic abortion registers were considered and new comparative analyses done. The data cover complete national populations. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: After an increase in abortion rates during the first years following liberalization, the general abortion rates stabilized and even decreased in all Nordic countries, especially for women under 25 years. From the mid-1980s higher awareness about pregnancy termination led women to present at an earlier gestational age, which was accelerated by the introduction of medical abortion some years later. Most terminations (80-86%) are now done before the 9th gestational week in all countries, primarily by medical rather than surgical means. Introduction of routine ultrasound screening in pregnancy during the late 1980s, increased the number of 2nd trimester abortions on fetal anomaly indications without an overall increase in the proportion of 2nd relative to 1st trimester abortions. Further refinement of ultrasound screening and non-invasive prenatal diagnostic methods led to a slight increase in the proportion of early 2nd trimester abortions after the year 2000. Country-specific differences in abortion rates have remained stable over the 50 years of liberalized abortion laws.


Assuntos
Aborto Induzido , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Países Escandinavos e Nórdicos/epidemiologia , Aborto Induzido/legislação & jurisprudência , Aborto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos , Aborto Induzido/tendências , Adulto , Aborto Legal/legislação & jurisprudência , Aborto Legal/estatística & dados numéricos , Aborto Legal/história , Adulto Jovem , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente
3.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(7): e2424310, 2024 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39078630

RESUMO

Importance: With decreasing access to facility-based abortion in the US, an increase in self-managed abortion (SMA) using various methods is anticipated. To date, no studies have examined changes in SMA in the shifting policy landscape. Objective: To estimate changes in SMA prevalence among the general US population from before to after the Supreme Court's June 2022 decision overturning federal abortion protections. Design, Setting, and Participants: Serial cross-sectional surveys were administered throughout the US from December 10, 2021, to January 11, 2022, and June 14 to July 7, 2023. Participants included online panel members assigned female sex at birth, ages 18 to 49 years (or ages 15-17 years if a household member), who were English- or Spanish-speaking. Exposure: Year of the survey (2021-2022 vs 2023). Main Outcome and Measures: Participants were asked whether they had "ever taken or done something on their own, without medical assistance, to try to end a pregnancy" and, if so, details of their experience. Changes in the weighted SMA prevalence between survey years were examined, factors associated with SMA experience were identified, and projected lifetime SMA prevalence was calculated using discrete-time event history models, accounting for abortion underreporting. Results: Median age of the participants was 32.5 (IQR, 25-41) years in 2021-2022 (n = 7016) and 32.0 (IQR, 24-40) in 2023 (n = 7148). Across both years, approximately 14% were non-Hispanic Black, 21% were Hispanic, and 54% were non-Hispanic White. The weighted adjusted proportion that ever attempted SMA was 2.4% (95% CI, 1.9%-3.0%) in 2021-2022 and 3.4% (95% CI, 2.8%-4.0%) in 2023-an increase of 1.0% (95% CI, 0.2%-1.7%; P = .03). Projected lifetime SMA prevalence accounting for abortion underreporting was 10.7% (95% CI, 8.6%-12.8%). In adjusted analyses, SMA experience was higher among non-Hispanic Black (4.3%; 95% CI, 2.8%-5.8%) vs other racial and ethnic (2.7%; 95% CI, 2.2%-3.1%) groups (P = .04) and sexual and gender minority (5.0%; 95% CI, 3.4%-6.6%) vs heterosexual or cisgender (2.5%; 95% CI, 2.0%-2.9%) participants (P < .001). Approximately 4 in 10 (45.3% in 2021 and 39.0% in 2023) SMA attempts occurred before age 20 years. The methods used included herbs (29.8% [2021-2022] vs 25.9% [2023]), physical methods (28.6% [2021-2022] vs 29.7% [2023]), or alcohol or other substances (17.9% [2021-2022] vs 18.6% [2023]). Few participants (7.1% [2021-2022] vs 4.7% [2023]) sought emergency care for a complication. Conclusions and Relevance: In this serial nationally representative survey study, increased SMA was observed following the loss of federal abortion protections. The findings revealed increased SMA use among marginalized groups, most often with ineffective methods. These findings suggest the need to expand access to alternative models of safe and effective abortion care and ensure those seeking health care post-SMA do not face legal risks.


Assuntos
Aborto Induzido , Humanos , Feminino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto , Gravidez , Estudos Transversais , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Aborto Induzido/legislação & jurisprudência , Aborto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aborto Legal/legislação & jurisprudência , Aborto Legal/estatística & dados numéricos , Autogestão , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Decisões da Suprema Corte
4.
J Nepal Health Res Counc ; 22(1): 12-20, 2024 Jun 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39080931

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Even after two decades of legalization of abortion in Nepal, most women and girls still do not have knowledge on abortion legality and face abortion barriers. This study will explore perceived barriers to safe abortion and the factors associated with it. METHODS: A Mixed method study design was conducted in 30 wards of 20 Municipals of seven districts of Lumbini and Sudurpaschim provinces. Quantitative data was analyzed for 673 women of reproductive age of 15-49 years. For qualitative data, key informant interviews were conducted. The analysis was done on five different barriers and a composite variable was created from them. RESULTS: Most women and girls perceived social (34.6%), followed by family (30.6%), physical (30.6%), personal (29.5%), and health facility (14.9%) barriers to access safe abortion services. The key finding was that women and girls with knowledge on abortion legality were more likely to perceive barriers to abortion (AOR:2.31, CI:1.574-3.394). Women and girls with higher educational and economic status as well as Dalit women were less likely to perceive barriers to abortion services whereas never married women and girls perceived more barriers in accessing abortion services. CONCLUSIONS: Women and girls perceived several barriers to access safe abortion services. Women who have better knowledge on abortion legality recognize more barriers regarding abortion. This highlights the importance of raising awareness of women and girls on abortion rights to empower them in recognizing and advocating for the removal of the obstacles that stop them from getting abortion services.


Assuntos
Aborto Induzido , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Feminino , Nepal , Adolescente , Adulto , Adulto Jovem , Aborto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos , Aborto Induzido/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Gravidez , Entrevistas como Assunto , Aborto Legal/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa Qualitativa
7.
JAMA Pediatr ; 178(8): 784-791, 2024 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38913344

RESUMO

Importance: Prior observational research has shown that infants born in states with more abortion restrictions are more likely to die during infancy. It is unclear how recent and more severe abortion bans in the US have impacted infant mortality. Objective: To examine whether Texas Senate Bill 8 (SB8), which banned abortions after embryonic cardiac activity and did not allow exemptions for congenital anomalies, is associated with infant mortality in the state of Texas. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study of all recorded infant deaths from the state of Texas and 28 comparison states used a comparative interrupted time series analysis with an augmented synthetic control approach and national birth certificate data from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022, to estimate the difference between the number of observed and expected infant and neonatal deaths and death rates among monthly cohorts exposed to Texas' SB8. Exposure: Deaths in March 2022 were treated as the first cohort exposed to the Texas' SB8 abortion policy because these infants (if born full term) were approximately 10 to 14 weeks' gestation when SB8 went into effect on September 1, 2021. The exposure period was thus March through December 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Our outcomes were monthly counts and rates of infant (aged <1 year) and neonatal (aged <28 days) deaths in the exposure period in Texas. In secondary analyses, annual changes in cause-specific infant deaths between 2021 and 2022 in Texas and the rest of the US were examined. Results: Between 2018 and 2022, there were 102 391 infant deaths in the US, with 10 351 of these deaths occurring in the state of Texas. Between 2021 and 2022, infant deaths in Texas increased from 1985 to 2240, or 255 additional deaths. This corresponds to a 12.9% increase, whereas the rest of the US experienced a comparatively lower 1.8% increase. On the basis of the counterfactual analysis that used data from Texas and eligible comparison states, an excess of 216 infant deaths (95% CI, -122 to 554) was observed from March to December 2022, or a 12.7% increase above expectation. At the monthly level, significantly greater-than-expected counts were observed for 4 months between March and December 2022: April, July, September, and October. An analysis of neonatal deaths found somewhat similar patterns, with significantly greater-than-expected neonatal deaths in April and October 2022. Descriptive statistics by cause of death showed that infant deaths attributable to congenital anomalies in 2022 increased more for Texas (22.9% increase) but not the rest of the US (3.1% decrease). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that Texas' 2021 ban on abortion in early pregnancy was associated with unexpected increases in infant and neonatal deaths in Texas between 2021 and 2022. Congenital anomalies, which are the leading cause of infant death, also increased in Texas but not the rest of the US. Although replication and further analyses are needed to understand the mechanisms behind these findings, the results suggest that restrictive abortion policies may have important unintended consequences in terms of trauma to families and medical cost as a result of increases in infant mortality. These findings are particularly relevant given the recent Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization US Supreme Court decision and subsequent rollbacks of reproductive rights in many US states.


Assuntos
Mortalidade Infantil , Humanos , Texas/epidemiologia , Feminino , Gravidez , Mortalidade Infantil/tendências , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Estudos de Coortes , Aborto Legal/legislação & jurisprudência , Aborto Legal/estatística & dados numéricos , Aborto Induzido/legislação & jurisprudência , Aborto Induzido/mortalidade , Aborto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida
8.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 43(5): 682-690, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709960

RESUMO

Women who are pregnant or recently gave birth are significantly more likely to be killed by an intimate partner than nonpregnant, nonpostpartum women of reproductive age, implicating the risk of fatal violence conferred by pregnancy itself. The rapidly increasing passage of state legislation has restricted or banned access to abortion care across the US. We used the most recent and only source of population-based data to examine the association between state laws that restrict access to abortion and trends in intimate partner violence-related homicide among women and girls ages 10-44 during the period 2014-20. Using robust difference-in-differences ecologic modeling, we found that enforcement of each additional Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP) law was associated with a 3.4 percent increase in the rate of intimate partner violence-related homicide in this population. We estimated that 24.3 intimate partner violence-related homicides of women and girls ages 10-44 were associated with TRAP laws implemented in the states and years included in this analysis. Assessment of policies that restrict access to abortion should consider their potential harm to reproductive-age women through the risk for violent death.


Assuntos
Aborto Induzido , Homicídio , Violência por Parceiro Íntimo , Humanos , Feminino , Violência por Parceiro Íntimo/estatística & dados numéricos , Violência por Parceiro Íntimo/legislação & jurisprudência , Homicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Homicídio/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos , Adolescente , Gravidez , Adulto , Aborto Induzido/legislação & jurisprudência , Aborto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Adulto Jovem , Governo Estadual , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Aborto Legal/legislação & jurisprudência , Aborto Legal/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2413847, 2024 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38809551

RESUMO

Importance: The Supreme Court decision Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization (Dobbs) overturned federal protections to abortion care and altered the reproductive health care landscape. Thus far, aggregated state-level data reveal increases in the number of abortions in states where abortion is still legal, but there is limited information on delays to care and changes in the characteristics of people accessing abortion in these states after Dobbs. Objective: To examine changes in abortion provision and delays to care after Dobbs. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study of all abortions performed at an independent, high-volume reproductive health care clinic network in Washington state from January 1, 2017, to July 31, 2023. Using an interrupted time series, the study assessed changes in abortion care after Dobbs. Exposure: Abortion care obtained after (June 24, 2022, to July 31, 2023) vs before (January 1, 2017, to June 23, 2022) Dobbs. Main Outcome and Measure: Primary outcomes included weekly number of abortions and out-of-state patients and weekly average of gestational duration (days) and time to appointment (days). Results: Among the 18 379 abortions during the study period, most were procedural (13 192 abortions [72%]) and funded by public insurance (11 412 abortions [62%]). The mean (SD) age of individuals receiving abortion care was 28.5 (6.44) years. Following Dobbs, the number of procedural abortions per week increased by 6.35 (95% CI, 2.83-9.86), but then trended back toward pre-Dobbs levels. The number of out-of-state patients per week increased by 2 (95% CI, 1.1-3.6) and trends remained stable. The average gestational duration per week increased by 6.9 (95% CI, 3.6-10.2) days following Dobbs, primarily due to increased gestations of procedural abortions. The average gestational duration among out-of-state patients did not change following Dobbs, but it did increase by 6 days for in-state patients (5.9; 95% CI, 3.2-8.6 days). There were no significant changes in time to appointment. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings provide a detailed picture of changes in abortion provision and delays to care after Dobbs in a state bordering a total ban state. In this study, more people traveled from out of state to receive care and in-state patients sought care a week later in gestation. These findings can inform interventions and policies to improve access for all seeking abortion care.


Assuntos
Aborto Induzido , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Washington , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Gravidez , Aborto Induzido/legislação & jurisprudência , Aborto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Aborto Legal/legislação & jurisprudência , Aborto Legal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente
11.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care ; 29(3): 131-137, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38683765

RESUMO

METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with review of medical records of women assisted between 2015 and 2020. The variables were socio-demographic and SV characteristics, gestational age, reactions towards pregnancy and outcome. We compared outcome groups using the chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and the Kruskal-Wallis test. The significance level was 5%. RESULTS: We evaluated the medical records of 235 women, of which 153(65%) had undergone to abortion; 17(7.2%) had a spontaneous abortion; 19(8%) remained pregnant; 25(10.6%) had an abortion denied; and 21(8.9%) had been lost to follow-up. Out of the total number of women, 44(18.7%) were adolescents, 152(65.2%) were white and 201(88.5%) had an education ≥9 years. Women who remained pregnant had a known aggressor, disclosed the pregnancy (p < 0.001) and were more ambivalent (p < 0.001) than the other groups. Gestational age was higher in the denied abortion group than in the performed abortion group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Feelings related to decision-making about abortion affected all groups, with differences. It is important to give women space to be heard, so they can make their own decisions.


Abortion care is possible in places with restrictive laws; however, women with more vulnerable characteristics did not seek the service. Legal restrictions interfere with women's decision-making about abortion and can promote inequality in gaining access to health services.


Assuntos
Aborto Legal , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Brasil , Adulto , Aborto Legal/legislação & jurisprudência , Aborto Legal/estatística & dados numéricos , Aborto Legal/psicologia , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Aborto Induzido/legislação & jurisprudência , Aborto Induzido/psicologia , Aborto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos , Idade Gestacional , Resultado da Gravidez , Aborto Espontâneo/psicologia , Aborto Espontâneo/epidemiologia
15.
An. Facultad Med. (Univ. Repúb. Urug., En línea) ; 11(1): e208, 2024. ilus, graf, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS, BNUY, UY-BNMED | ID: biblio-1556819

RESUMO

Objetivo: el objetivo de este estudio es conocer el estado de situación de los procesos de las usuarias que asistieron a la policlínica de interrupción voluntaria del embarazo en el Hospital de Clínicas en un período de agosto de 2019 a agosto de 2020. Metodología y materiales: estudio descriptivo y retrospectivo, a partir de la entrevista clínica de salud mental y una ficha de uso interno utilizada para relevar el proceso de toma de decisión. En muestra de 78 usuarias se analizan variables sociodemográficas, ginecoobstétricas y asociadas al proceso de interrupción, antecedentes psicológicos y/o psiquiátricos y motivos de interrupción. Resultados: el promedio de edad es de 25 años, la mayoría en pareja y ciclo básico educativo finalizado. El promedio de edad gestacional fue de 7,36 semanas. El 81% de las mujeres no había realizado un IVE. Un 65.4% de las mujeres no tienen antecedentes psicológicos y/o psiquiátricos. No existe relación significativa entre haber realizado un IVE previamente y tener antecedentes psicológicos y/o psiquiátricos.Utilizaban anticonceptivos 78.2%. Conclusiones: la interrupción del embarazo supone una situación vital estresante para quienes la transitan, se encuentran atravesadas por múltiples motivos que inciden en la toma de decisión de interrumpir. Se infiere que la realización de uno o más procedimientos de IVE no necesariamente está relacionada con tener un antecedente psicopatológico o cursar una psicopatología al realizar el proceso. Es pertinente promover la atención focalizada en las pacientes, integrando la perspectiva de género y derechos humanos, mejorar los procesos de atención, asesoramiento en salud mental, sexual y reproductiva de las usuarias y sus acompañantes.


Objective: The objective of this study is to know the status of the processes of the users who attended the polyclinic for voluntary termination of pregnancy at the Hospital de Clínicas in a period from August 2019 to August 2020. Methodology and materials: The study used descriptive and retrospective methods based on interviews with mental health professionals and a form that was used to ask about how people make decisions. In a sample of 78 users, sociodemographic, obstetric and gynecological variables associated with the discontinuation process, psychological and/or psychiatric history and reasons for discontinuation were analyzed. Results: The average age is 25 years, most people are married and have finished their elementary education. The average gestational age was 7.36 weeks. 81% of the women had not undergone an IVE. 65.4% of women have no psychological and/or psychiatric history. There is no significant relationship between having previously performed an IVE and having a psychological and/or psychiatric history. 78.2% used contraceptives. Conclusions: The interruption of pregnancy is a stressful life situation for those who go through it; they are faced with multiple reasons that influence the decision to terminate. It is inferred that carrying out one or more IVE procedures is not necessarily related to having a psychopathological history or experiencing psychopathology when carrying out the process. It is pertinent to promote patient-focused care, integrating the gender and human rights perspective, improve care processes, and provide advice on mental, sexual, and reproductive health of users and their companions.


Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo é conhecer a situação dos processos das usuárias que compareceram à policlínica de interrupção voluntária da gravidez do Hospital de Clínicas no período de agosto de 2019 a agosto de 2020. Metodologia e materiais: estudo descritivo e retrospectivo, baseado na entrevista clínica de saúde mental e em formulário de uso interno utilizado para levantamento do processo de tomada de decisão. Numa amostra de 78 usuárias foram analisadas variáveis ​​sociodemográficas, obstétricas e ginecológicas associadas ao processo de descontinuação, histórico psicológico e/ou psiquiátrico e motivos de descontinuação. Resultados: a idade média é de 25 anos, a maioria vive em casal e completou o ciclo educativo básico. A idade gestacional média foi de 7,36 semanas. 81% das mulheres não realizaram IVE. 65,4% das mulheres não têm antecedentes psicológicos e/ou psiquiátricos. Não há relação significativa entre ter realizado EIV anteriormente e ter antecedentes psicológicos e/ou psiquiátricos, 78,2% faziam uso de anticoncepcional. Conclusões: a interrupção da gravidez é uma situação estressante de vida para quem passa por ela, pois se deparam com múltiplos motivos que influenciam na decisão de interrompê-la. Infere-se que a realização de um ou mais procedimentos de IVE não está necessariamente relacionada a ter histórico psicopatológico, ou vivenciar psicopatologia na realização do processo. É pertinente promover cuidados centrados no paciente, integrando a perspectiva de gênero e direitos humanos, melhorar os processos de cuidados e aconselhamento sobre saúde mental, sexual e reprodutiva dos utentes e dos seus acompanhantes.


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Aspirantes a Aborto/estatística & dados numéricos , Aborto Legal/estatística & dados numéricos , Uruguai/epidemiologia , Aspirantes a Aborto/psicologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Distribuição por Idade , Fatores Sociodemográficos
16.
Femina ; 51(12): 661-665, 20231230. tab
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: biblio-1532468

RESUMO

Objetivo: Avaliar o desejo de gestantes, vítimas de violência sexual, em manter ou interromper a gravidez. Métodos: Estudo transversal retrospectivo que avaliou o desejo da gestante vítima de violência sexual pela manutenção ou interrupção da gravidez, no Programa de Atendimento às Vítimas de Violência Sexual, no período de janeiro de 2019 a setembro de 2022. Resultados: Foram acolhidas 67 gestantes vítimas de violência sexual que procuraram atendimento com vistas a orientação, manutenção ou interrupção da gestação. Entre elas, 56 (83,6%) pacientes solici- taram a interrupção da gestação e para 32 (57,2%) a solicitação foi aceita; 9 (16%) não tiveram a solicitação de interrupção autorizada por equipe multidisciplinar e mantiveram a gestação; 11 (16,4%) não solicitaram a interrupção e também optaram pela manutenção da gestação. A média das idades foi de 26 anos. Em sua maio- ria, eram solteiras, brancas e procedentes de munícipios do entorno de Caxias do Sul. O agressor era quase sempre desconhecido, e a agressão teria ocorrido pre- dominantemente na residência da vítima ou do agressor. Conclusão: No período estudado, foram avaliadas 67 gestações decorrentes de violência sexual. Dessas, 56 pacientes solicitaram a interrupção da gestação e 32 tiveram a solicitação aceita; nove não tiveram a solicitação de interrupção autorizada e mantiveram a gestação; 11 não solicitaram a interrupção e também optaram pela manutenção da gestação. Não cabe ao médico julgar a decisão da vítima, mas, sim, acolher e ofertar o seu direito de escolha.


Objective: To evaluate the desire of pregnant women, victims of sexual violence, to maintain or terminate pregnancy. Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study that evaluated the desire of pregnant women victims of sexual violence for the mainte- nance or interruption of pregnancy in Program to Assist Victims of Sexual Assault, from January 2019 to September 2022. Results: Sixty-seven pregnant women who were victim of sexual assault and who sought care for maintenance or interruption of pregnancy were received. Among these, 56 (83.6%) patients requested the interruption of pregnancy and in 32 (57.2%) cases the request was accepted; 9 (16%) didn't have the interruption request authorized by the multidisciplinary team and have kept the pregnancy; 11 (16.4%) didn't request the interruption and have chosen to keep the pregnancy. The average age was 26 years. They were single, white, and mostly from cities around Caxias do Sul. The aggressor was almost always unknown, and the assault occurred mostly at the victim's or aggressor's home. Conclusion: Sixty-seven pregnancies resulting from sexual assault were evaluated during the period of the study. Fifty-sixth patients of those have requested pregnancy termination and 32 had their request accepted; nine didn't have their request for termination authorized and have kept their pregnancy; eleven didn't request termination and have chosen to keep their pregnancy. It isn't up to the physician to judge the victim's decision, but to welcome and offer her the right to choose.


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Manutenção da Gravidez , Estupro , Aborto Legal/estatística & dados numéricos , Gestantes/psicologia , Gravidez/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais/métodos , Aborto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos , Violência contra a Mulher
18.
Archiv. med. fam. gen. (En línea) ; 20(2): 20-27, jul. 2023. graf
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1524171

RESUMO

En 2021 entró en vigencia en Argentina la Ley N.º 27.610. El objetivo es describir características de afiliadas a OSEP que solicitaron interrupción del embarazo (SIE).Trabajo observacional descriptivo. Se analizaron las variables del 0800 del Ministerio de Salud de la Nación de todas las personas que SIE con OSEP, entre el 24/01 y 31/12/2021. Los datos fueron analizados con SPSS Statistics. Se utilizaron moda, mediana, porcentaje, tasa y el chi2. Se recibieron 427 SIE, se concretaron 330 (77,3%). Solicitaron ive: media 28,59 años. Modo 19 y 33 años. Concretaron ive: modo 22 años. 84,5% se realizó ambulatorio con misoprostol. De las SIE, 50,4% eran solteras, 43,4% trabajaba, 59,1% tenía secundario completo. Se desconoce 32,8%. De las SIE, 52,7% refirió haber estado utilizando MAC (54,2% preservativo; 37,4% anticonceptivos orales; 2,8% métodos "naturales"; 2,2% DIU). La mayor cantidad fue de zonas urbanas del Gran Mendoza. Sin embargo, se observan tasas elevadas en zonas rurales respecto de algunas zonas urbanas y más pobladas. Se observó progresión de SIE a lo largo del año. Un 11% después de SIE decidió continuar con el embarazo. Aparentemente ninguna de las variables tuvo relación con esa decisión. El MAC utilizado fue mayormente preservativo y anticonceptivos orales. Esto podría indicar falta de educación y poco acceso a métodos de larga duración. La problemática de interrupción es transversal. En base a los resultados de este trabajo, las personas sin pareja conviviente, ante un embarazo no planificado serían las que SIE. Ninguna otra variable parece actuar como determinante. Tampoco del paso de la solicitud a la interrupción efectiva o a la continuación del embarazo. Hay que aumentar la accesibilidad a MAC en zonas rurales (AU)


In 2021, Law No. 27610 entered into force in Argentina. The objective is to describe characteristics of people with OSEP who requested termination of pregnancy (PWRTP). Descriptive observational work. The variables of the 0800 of the Ministry of Health of Argentina of all the PWRTP with OSEP, between 01/24 and 12/31/2021, were analyzed. Data were analyzed with SPSS Statistics. Mode, median, percentage, rate and chi2 were used. PWRTP: 427 requests were received, 330 (77.3%) were completed. PWRTP: mean 28.59 years. Mode 19 and 33 years. People who had an abortion: mode 22 years. 84.5% were performed on an outpatient basis with misoprostol. 50.4% of the PWRTP were single, 43.4% worked, 59.1% had completed high school, 32.8% unknown, 52.7% reported having been using contraceptive methods (CM): 54.2% condoms; 37.4% oral contraceptives; 2.8% "natural" methods; 2.2% IUDs. The largest amount was from urban areas of Mendoza. However, high rates are observed in rural areas. A progression of the amount of PWRTP was observed throughout the year. 11% after requesting an abortion decided to continue with the pregnancy. Apparently none of the variables was related to that decision. The CM used were mostly condoms and oral contraceptives. This may indicate a lack of education and poor access to long-acting CM. The problem of interruption is transversal. People without a cohabiting partner, faced with an unplanned pregnancy, are the ones who RTP. No other variable seems to act as a determinant. Nor from the transition from the request to the effective interruption or continuation of the pregnancy. We must increase the accessibility to CM in rural areas (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Adulto , Gravidez não Desejada , Aborto Legal/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticoncepção/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez não Planejada , Manutenção da Gravidez , Gravidez/estatística & dados numéricos , Zona Rural
20.
Rev. Bras. Saúde Mater. Infant. (Online) ; 22(4): 843-851, Oct.-Dec. 2022. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1422686

RESUMO

Abstract Objectives: to analyze abortions provided by law (APL) carried out in Brazil between 2010 and 2019 regarding the need for travel of users, as well as the expenditure of time and money on these trips. Methods: descriptive study of records of outpatient care and hospitalizations for APL between 2010 and 2019. The municipal provision and the inter-municipal flows for the realization of the APL, the availability of public transportation for this travel, as well as its cost and time, were identified. Results: 2.6% of Brazilian municipalities had a sustained provision of APL between 2010 and 2019. Of the 15,889 APL performed, 14.8% occurred in municipalities other than those where the user lived. The smaller the population size of the municipality of residence, the higher the percentage of the need for travel. Of these inter-municipal trips, 16.0% had regular round-trip links by public transport. The total travel time ranged from 26 minutes to 4 and a half days, and the cost from R$2.70 to R$1,218.06; the highest medians were among residents of the Midwest region. Conclusions: the concentration of services, the deficiency of inter-municipal public transport, and the expenditure on travel to access the APL are barriers to users that need the health service, demanding public policies to overcome them.


Resumo Objetivos: analisar as restrições aos abortos previstos em lei (APL) realizados no Brasil entre 2010 e 2019 quanto à necessidade de deslocamento das usuárias, bem como quanto ao dispêndio de tempo e dinheiro nessas viagens. Métodos: estudo descritivo dos registros de atendimentos ambulatoriais e internações para APL entre 2010 e 2019. Foram identificados a oferta municipal e os fluxos intermunicipais para realização dos APL, a disponibilidade de transporte coletivo para esse deslocamento, bem como seu custo e tempo. Resultados: 2,6% dos municípios brasileiros tiveram oferta sustentada de APL entre 2010 e 2019. Dos 15.889 APL realizados, 14,8% se deram em municípios diferentes daqueles de residência da usuária. Quanto menor o porte populacional do município de residência, maior o percentual com necessidade de viajar. Desses deslocamentos intermunicipais, 16,0% tinham ligações regulares de ida e retorno em transporte público. O tempo de viagem total variou de 26 minutos a quatro dias e meio, e o custo de R$ 2,70 a R$ 1.218,06; as maiores medianas estiveram entre as residentes da região Centro-Oeste. Conclusões: a concentração de serviços, a deficiência de transporte público intermunicipal, bem como o dispêndio com a viagem para acesso ao APL são barreiras às usuárias que precisam do serviço de saúde, demandando políticas públicas para sua superação.


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Transporte de Pacientes/economia , Transporte de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Aborto Legal/estatística & dados numéricos , Equidade no Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Hospitalização , Brasil , Estudos Transversais , Serviços de Saúde Reprodutiva
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA