Feasibility and Outcome of a Phase II Study of Intensive Induction Chemotherapy in 91 Elderly Patients with AML Evaluated Using a Simplified Multidimensional Geriatric Assessment.

INTRODUCTION: We prospectively tested in a phase II study high-dose aracytin and idarubicin plus amifostine as induction regimen in 149 patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) aged ≥ 60 years, evaluated by a simplified multidimensional geriatric assessment (MGA). METHODS: Ninety-one fully or partially fit patients (61%) were allocated to intensive chemotherapy and 58 (39%) frail patients to best supportive care (BSC). Intensively treated patients, showing early death and complete response (CR) rate respectively of 5.5% and 73.6%, received 61 consolidations, followed by autologous transplant (ASCT), stem cell transplantation (SCT) or gemtuzumab ozogamicin, depending on mobilization outcome and donor availability. RESULTS: The 8-year overall survival (OS) of these patients was 20.4%, with median duration of 11.4 months significantly superior to the 1.5 months of BSC arm (p < 0.001). Hyperleukocytosis and cytogenetics were predictors of survival with a relative risk of 1.8 in patients with poor karyotype without hyperleukocytosis (p = 0.02) and 3 in those with hyperleukocytosis (≥ 50,000/µl) (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: MGA allowed tailored post-consolidation in 53.8% of patients after high-dose aracytin induction, with long-term survival doubling that reported in the literature after standard-dose cytarabine regimens. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the Umin Clinical Trial Registry (www.umin.ac.jp/ctr), number R000014052.

Use of Amifostine for Cytoprotection during Radiation Therapy: A Review.

BACKGROUND: Radiation therapy is a cornerstone of the therapeutic modalities used in modern oncology. However, it is sometimes limited in its ability to achieve optimal tumor control by radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity. In delivering radiation therapy, a balance must be achieved between maximizing the dose to the tumor and minimizing any injury to the normal tissues. Amifostine was the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved clinical radiation protector intended to reduce the impact of radiation on normal tissue, lessening its toxicity and potentially allowing for increased tumor dose/control. Despite being FDA-approved almost 20 years ago, Amifostine has yet to achieve widespread clinical use. SUMMARY: A thorough review of Amifostine's development, mechanism of action, and current clinical status were conducted. A brief history of Amifostine is given, from its development at Walter Reid Institute of Research to its approval for clinical use. The mechanism of action of Amifostine is explored. The results of a complete literature review of all prospective randomized trials to date involving the use of Amifostine in radiation therapy are presented. The results are arranged by treatment site and salient findings discussed. Side effects and complications to consider in using Amifostine are reviewed. Key Messages: Amifostine has been explored as a radiation protectant in most radiation treatment sites. Studies have demonstrated efficacy of Amifostine in all treatment sites reviewed, but results are heterogeneous. The heterogeneity of studies looking at Amifostine as a clinical radiation protectant has precluded a definitive answer on its efficacy. Complicating its clinical use is its toxicity and delivery requirements. Amifostine has largely fallen out of use with the advent of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). However, side effects with IMRT remain a challenge and concern. The use of Amifostine in the IMRT era has been poorly explored and is worthy of future study.

Adequate nephroprotection reduces renal complications after hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITOC) is used for the treatment of malignant pleural tumors. Although HITOC proved to be safe, postoperative renal failure due to nephrotoxicity of intrapleural cisplatin remains a concern. METHODS: This single-center study was performed retrospectively in patients who underwent pleural tumor resection and HITOC between September 2008 and December 2018. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients (female n = 33; 39.3%) with malignant pleural tumors underwent surgical cytoreduction with subsequent HITOC (60 minutes; 42°C). During the study period, we gradually increased the dosage of cisplatin (100-150 mg/m2 BSA n = 36; 175 mg/m2 BSA n = 2) and finally added doxorubicin (cisplatin 175 mg/m2 BSA/doxorubicin 65 mg; n = 46). All patients had perioperative fluid balancing. The last 54 (64.3%) patients also received perioperative cytoprotection. Overall 29 patients (34.5%) experienced renal insufficiency. Despite higher cisplatin concentrations, patients with cytoprotection showed significantly lower postoperative serum creatinine levels after 1 week (P = .006) and at discharge (P = .020). Also, they showed less intermediate and severe renal insufficiencies (5.6% vs 13.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Adequate perioperative fluid management and cytoprotection seem to be effective in protecting renal function. This allows the administration of higher intracavitary cisplatin doses without raising the rate of renal insufficiencies.

The efficacy and safety of amifostine for the acute radiation syndrome.

Introduction: A radiation countermeasure that can be used prior to radiation exposure to protect the population from the harmful effects of radiation exposure remains a major unmet medical need and is recognized as an important area for research. Despite substantial advances in the research and development for finding nontoxic, safe, and effective prophylactic countermeasures for the acute radiation syndrome (ARS), no such agent has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Area covered: Despite the progress made to improve the effectiveness of amifostine as a radioprotector for ARS, none of the strategies have resolved the issue of its toxicity/side effects. Thus, the FDA has approved amifostine for limited clinical indications, but not for non-clinical uses. This article reviews recent strategies and progress that have been made to move forward this potentially useful countermeasure for ARS. Expert opinion: Although the recent investigations have been promising for fielding safe and effective radiation countermeasures, additional work is needed to improve and advance drug design and delivery strategies to get FDA approval for broadened, non-clinical use of amifostine during a radiological/nuclear scenario.

Butirato de sodio como agente coadyuvante de la acción radioprotectora de la amifostina / Sodium butyrate as a coadyuvant agent of the radioprotecting action of amifostine / Butirato de sódio como agente coadjuvante da ação radioprotetora da amifostina

Entre los escasos radioprotectores en uso, la amifostina resulta eficaz para reducir la toxicidad aguda inducida por la radiación ionizante. Sin embargo, presenta efectos tóxicos importantes que impiden su uso repetido o en dosis altas. Es necesario entonces desarrollar radioprotectores menos tóxicos, por sí mismos o como coadyuvantes de la amifostina en dosis bajas. Se expusieron ratas Sprague-Dawley a una dosis de rayos X de 6 Gy (cuerpo entero). Se ensayó el butirato de sodio como mitigante luego de una dosis baja de amifostina previa a la irradiación. A distintos tiempos después de la irradiación se realizó el recuento de eritrocitos, leucocitos y la fórmula leucocitaria. Los efectos genotóxicos se evaluaron en leucocitos de sangre mediante el ensayo Cometa. Se realizaron también estudios de supervivencia a 60 días y la evaluación histológica del duodeno e intestino grueso. El efecto del tratamiento resultó moderadamente protector respecto de la recuperación de los valores normales de eritrocitos, leucocitos y la fórmula leucocitaria en los animales sobrevivientes en ambos sexos, así como de los epitelios intestinales y el ADN de los leucocitos. También aumentó significativamente la sobrevida a 60 días. La radioprotección con amifostina en una dosis baja seguida de una mitigación con butirato fue claramente significativa.

Among the few radioprotectors in use, amifostine is effective in reducing the acute toxicity induced by ionizing radiation. However, it has important toxic effects that prevent its repeated use or in high doses. It is necessary then to develop less toxic radioprotectors, by themselves or as adjuvants of amifostine in low doses. Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to an X-ray dose of 6 Gy (whole body). Sodium butyrate was tested as a mitigant after a low dose of amifostine prior to irradiation. At different times after the irradiation, the erythrocytes, leukocytes and the leukocyte formula were counted. Genotoxic effects were evaluated in blood leukocytes by the Comet assay. Sixty-day survival studies and histological evaluation of the duodenum and large intestine were also performed. The effect of the treatment was moderately protective with respect to the recovery of the normal values of erythrocytes, leukocytes and the leukocyte formula in the surviving animals in both sexes as well as for the intestinal epithelia and leukocytes DNA. It also significantly increased the 60-day survival. The radioprotection with amifostine in a low dose followed by mitigation with butyrate was clearly significant.

Entre os poucos radioprotetores em uso, a amifostina é eficaz na redução da toxicidade aguda induzida pela radiação ionizante. No entanto, tem importantes efeitos tóxicos que impedem seu uso repetido ou em altas doses. É necessário, então, desenvolver radioprotetores menos tóxicos, isoladamente ou como coadjuvantes da amifostina em baixas doses. Ratos Sprague-Dawley foram expostos a uma dose de raios X de 6 Gy (corpo inteiro). O butirato de sódio foi testado como mitigante após uma dose baixa de amifostina antes da irradiação. Em diferentes momentos após a irradiação, os eritrócitos, leucócitos e a fórmula de leucócitos foram contados. Os efeitos genotóxicos foram avaliados em leucócitos de sangue pelo ensaio Cometa. Estudos de sobrevida de 60 dias e avaliação histológica do duodeno e do intestino grosso também foram realizados. O efeito do tratamento resultou moderadamente protetor em relação à recuperação de valores normais de eritrócitos, leucócitos e fórmula leucocitária nos animais sobreviventes em ambos os sexos, bem como protegeu epitélios intestinais e o DNA dos leucócitos. Também aumentou significativamente a sobrevida para 60 dias. A radioproteção com amifostina em baixa dose seguida de uma mitigação com butirato foi claramente significativa.

Preventing Radiation-Induced Injury by Topical Application of an Amifostine Metabolite-Loaded Thermogel.

PURPOSE: Despite the development of high-precision radiation therapy, ionizing radiation inevitably damages healthy tissues. Radiodermatitis and radioinduced oral mucositis are frequent and significant side effects among patients with breast and head and neck cancer, respectively. These radiation-related injuries negatively affect patient quality of life and can lead to unplanned therapeutic breaks and compromise treatment outcomes. Currently, no preventive or mitigating agent has emerged to address these issues. Although amifostine, a well-known free radical scavenger, has proven efficacy against specific radio- and chemo-induced toxicities, severe adverse side effects (reversible hypotension, nausea, emesis, etc) combined with logistical hurdles are associated with its recommended intravenous route of administration, limiting its use. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We developed a thermogel containing the active thiol metabolite of amifostine (CPh-1014) that polymerizes at body temperature and serves as a matrix for topical application onto the skin or mucosa. RESULTS: Applied before irradiation, CPh-1014 greatly reduced the severity of oral mucositis and dermatitis induced by either a single dose or fractionated irradiation regimens in in vivo mouse models. The cytoprotective effect of CPh-1014 was confirmed by the decrease in DNA double-strand breaks in the irradiated epithelium. Noticeably, CPh-1014 did not affect radiation therapy efficacy against tumors grafted at submucosal and subcutaneous sites. In contrast to the intravenous administration of amifostine, CPh-1014 oral application did not induce hypotension in dogs. CONCLUSIONS: CPh-1014 confers radioprotective effects in healthy tissues with reduced systemic side effects without compromising radiation therapy efficacy. We propose CPh-1014 as an easy-to-implement therapeutic approach to alleviate radiation therapy toxicity in patients with breast and head and neck cancer.

Final outcomes of escalated melphalan 280 mg/m2 with amifostine cytoprotection followed autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: high CR and VGPR rates do not translate into improved survival.

The most common preparative regimen for autologous transplantation (ASCT) in myeloma (MM) consists of melphalan 200 mg/m2 (MEL 200). Higher doses of melphalan 220-260 mg/m2, although relatively well tolerated, have not shown significant improvement in clinical outcomes. Several approaches have been pursued in the past to improve CR rates, including poly-chemotherapy preparative regimens, tandem ASCT, consolidation, and/or maintenance therapy. Since there is a steep dose-response effect for intravenous melphalan, we evaluated an alternative single ASCT strategy using higher-dose melphalan at 280 mg/m2 (MEL 280) with amifostine as a cytoprotectant as the maximum tolerated dose determined in an earlier phase I dose escalation trial. We report the final long-term outcomes of MM patients who underwent conditioning with MEL 280 with amifostine cytoprotection followed by ASCT. Although the complete response rate was quite high in the era pre-dating the routine use of novel therapies (proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents) (49%), the progression-free survival was a disappointing 22 months. The implications of this dichotomy between the excellent depth of ASCT response and progression-free survival are discussed.

Localized Delivery of Amifostine Enhances Salivary Gland Radioprotection.

Radiotherapy for head and neck cancers commonly causes damage to salivary gland tissue, resulting in xerostomia (dry mouth) and numerous adverse medical and quality-of-life issues. Amifostine is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved radioprotective drug used clinically to prevent xerostomia. However, systemic administration of amifostine is limited by severe side effects, including rapid decrease in blood pressure (hypotension), nausea, and a narrow therapeutic window. In this study, we demonstrate that retroductal delivery of amifostine and its active metabolite, WR-1065, to murine submandibular glands prior to a single radiation dose of 15 Gy maintained gland function and significantly increased acinar cell survival. Furthermore, in vivo stimulated saliva secretion was maintained in retrograde-treated groups at levels significantly higher than irradiated-only and systemically treated groups. In contrast to intravenous injections, retroductal delivery of WR-1065 or amifostine significantly attenuated hypotension. We conclude that localized delivery to salivary glands markedly improves radioprotection at the cellular level, as well as mitigates the adverse side effects associated with systemic administration. These results support the further development of a localized delivery system that would be compatible with the fractionated dose regimen used clinically.

Novel Formulation Strategy to Improve the Feasibility of Amifostine Administration.

PURPOSE: Amifostine (AMF), a radioprotectant, is FDA-approved for intravenous administration in cancer patients receiving radiation therapy (XRT). Unfortunately, it remains clinically underutilized due to adverse side effects. The purpose of this study is to define the pharmacokinetic profile of an oral AMF formulation potentially capable of reducing side effects and increasing clinical feasibility. METHODS: Calvarial osteoblasts were radiated under three conditions: no drug, AMF, and WR-1065 (active metabolite). Osteogenic potential of cells was measured using alkaline phosphatase staining. Next, rats were given AMF intravenously or directly into the jejunum, and pharmacokinetic profiles were evaluated. Finally, rats were given AMF orally or subcutaneously, and blood samples were analyzed for pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: WR-1065 preserved osteogenic potential of calvarial osteoblasts after XRT to a greater degree than AMF. Direct jejunal AMF administration incurred a systemic bioavailability of 61.5%. Subcutaneously administrated AMF yielded higher systemic levels, a more rapid peak exposure (0.438 vs. 0.875 h), and greater total systemic exposure of WR-1065 (116,756 vs. 16,874 ng*hr/ml) compared to orally administered AMF. CONCLUSIONS: Orally administered AMF achieves a similar systemic bioavailability and decreased peak plasma level of WR-1065 compared to intravenously administered AMF, suggesting oral AMF formulations maintain radioprotective efficacy without causing onerous side effects, and are clinically feasible.

Amifostine reduces gastro-intestinal toxicity after autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma.

High-dose melphalan (HDM) followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) remains the standard-of-care therapy for multiple myeloma (MM) even with the availability of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs. Gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity is the main cause of morbidity after HDM. Amifostine, a cytoprotective agent, may reduce HDM-associated GI toxicity. We conducted a case control study comparing HDM + auto-HCT with or without amifostine for MM patients. One hundred and seven patients treated at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center who received pre-transplant amifostine were compared to 114 patients treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center without use of this agent. Amifostine 740 mg/m2 was administered as a bolus infusion at 24 h and 15 min before HDM. Patients' characteristics were similar in both the groups. Amifostine therapy was well tolerated without any significant adverse effects. Grade II or greater oral mucositis (27.1% vs 47.4%; p = .002), nausea (31.8% vs. 86.0%; p = .0001), vomiting (18.7% vs. 52.6%; p = .0001) and diarrhea (56.1% vs. 72.7%; p = .006) occurred less frequently in the amifostine-treated group. There was no discernable effect of amifostine on engraftment, progression-free or overall survival. Our results indicate that amifostine decreases GI toxicity while preserving anti-myeloma efficacy of HDM and auto-HCT.

Efecto radioprotector del piruvato de etilo, solo o como coadyuvante de la amifostina / Radioprotective effect of ethyl pyruvate alone or as a coadyuvant of amifostine / Efeito radioprotetor do piruvato de etila, sozinho ou como um coadjuvante de amifostina

Entre los radioprotectores con uso clínico se destaca la amifostina (WR- 2721), eficaz pero con efectos secundarios que impiden su uso repetitivo. Es interés de los autores desarrollar radioprotectores menos tóxicos, por sí mismos o como coadyuvantes de amifostina. Ratas machos o hembras se expusieron a una dosis de rayos X de 2 Gy. Se ensayó el piruvato de etilo, solo o conjuntamente con amifostina. Cuarenta y ocho horas después de la exposición a la radiación, se realizó el recuento de eritrocitos, de leucocitos y la fórmula leucocitaria. Los efectos genotóxicos se evaluaron en leucocitos de sangre mediante el ensayo Cometa. Se realizaron también estudios de supervivencia a 60 días post-irradiación. En los animales irradiados disminuyeron los eritrocitos, y el recuento de leucocitos se redujo drásticamente respecto al control, presentando además una fórmula alterada. El tratamiento con piruvato de etilo resultó en una protección de los eritrocitos en ambos sexos. El daño genético disminuyó significativamente por el tratamiento con piruvato de etilo solo o combinado con amifostina, y en hembras se observó una mayor supervivencia solo con el tratamiento combinado. El piruvato de etilo mostró una acción radioprotectora significativa, que podría mejorarse aumentando la dosis o el tiempo de tratamiento, ya que tiene muy baja toxicidad.

Among the currently available radioprotectors, only amifostine (WR-2721) has shown in clinical trials to reduce radiation-induced toxicity. This compound is an efficient radioprotector but it exhibits some undesirable side effects which prevent its repetitive use. Efforts are directed to develop radioprotective agents with lower toxicity, with their own protective potential or suitable as coadyuvants of amifostine. The present study describes the results obtained by repetitive oral administration of ethyl pyruvate. Male or female rats were exposed to an X-ray dose of 2 Gy. Forty-eight hours after exposure to radiation, erythrocyte count, leukocyte and differential count were performed. Genotoxic effects were assessed in blood leukocytes by the Comet assay. Survival studies were also performed at 60 days post-irradiation. Eritrocyte and leukocyte were reduced in animals exposed to radiation compared to the control, also presenting an altered formula. Treatment with ethyl pyruvate resulted in a protection on erythrocytes of both sexes. Genetic damage was significantly decreased by ethyl pyruvate alone or combined with amifostine, and in females, higher survival was observed only with combined administration. Ethyl pyruvate showed a significant radioprotective action, which could be improved by increasing the dose or time of treatment because it has low toxicity.

Entre os radioprotetores com uso clínico destaca-se a amifostina (WR-2721) eficaz mas com efeitos secundários que impedem seu uso repetitivo. O interesse dos autores é desenvolver radioprotetores menos tóxicos, por si mesmos ou como coadjuvantes de amistofina. Ratos machos ou fêmeas foram expostos a doses de raios X de 2Gy. Ensaiou-se o piruvato de etila, só ou junto com amifostina. Quarenta e oito horas após a exposição à radiação foi realizada a contagem de eritrócitos, de leucócitos e da fórmula leucocitária. Efeitos genotóxicos foram avaliados em leucócitos do sangue pelo Ensaio Cometa. Estudos de sobrevivência foram também realizados a 60 dias pós-irradiação. Nos animais irradiados diminuíram os eritrócitos, e a contagem de leucócitos se reduziu drasticamente em comparação com o controle, apresentando também uma fórmula alterada. O tratamento com piruvato de etila resultou numa proteção dos eritrócitos em ambos os sexos. O dano genético diminuiu significativamente pelo tratamento com piruvato de etila sozinho ou combinado com amifostina, e nas fêmeas se observou maior sobrevivência só com o tratamento combinado. O piruvato de etila mostrou uma ação radioprotetora significativa, que poderia ser melhorada pelo aumento da dose ou do tempo de tratamento, visto que tem baixa toxicidade.

Sustained-release microspheres of amifostine for improved radio-protection, patient compliance, and reduced side effects.

A biweekly administration of sustained-release microsphere dosage form of amifostine, a radioprotective drug used in radiotherapy, was performed to examine the feasibility to minimize injection frequency and blood concentration-associated side effects. Model animal trials indicated that this subcutaneously injecting microspheres, 50-100 µm in diameter, achieved bi-weekly prolonged radio-protective efficacy and, at the same time, significantly reduced skin irritation than the solution form of amifostine given by the same administration route. In addition, the hypertension associated with blood concentration of amifostine was not observed in the drug-treated rats. The animals given the amifostine microspheres and amifostine showed significantly differences in white blood cell, red blood cell, hematocrit, hemoglobin and spleen tissue histopathology after exposed under a cobalt-60 γ-radiation at a dose rate of 1.0 Gy/min for 6 min. The in vitro release profile of amifostine from the micropsheres showed a minor initial burst (less than 20% of total drug loading in the first day of administration), consisting with the side effects observations. The results suggest that amifostine encapsulated in sustained-release microspheres may be an ideal dosage form for prolonged radio-protective efficacy and improved patient compliance.

Structural and functional damages of whole body ionizing radiation on rat brain homogenate membranes and protective effect of amifostine.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of whole body ionizing radiation at a sublethal dose on rat brain homogenate membranes and the protective effects of amifostine on these systems at molecular level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats, in the absence and presence of amifostine, were whole-body irradiated at a single dose of 8 Gy and decapitated after 24 h. The brain homogenate membranes of these rats were analyzed using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. RESULTS: Ionizing radiation caused a significant increase in the lipid to protein ratio and significant decreases in the ratios of olefinic = CH/lipid, CH2/lipid, carbonyl ester/lipid and CH3/lipid suggesting, respectively, a more excessive decrease in the protein content and the degradation of lipids as a result of lipid peroxidation. In addition, radiation changed the secondary structure of proteins and the status of packing of membrane lipid head groups. Furthermore, it caused a decrease in lipid order and an increase in membrane fluidity. The administration of amifostine before ionizing radiation inhibited all the radiation-induced alterations in brain homogenate membranes. CONCLUSIONS: The results revealed that whole body ionizing radiation at a sublethal dose causes significant alterations in the structure, composition and dynamics of brain homogenate membranes and amifostine has a protective effect on these membranes.

THE POTENTIATION OF THE RADIOPROTECTIVE EFFICACY OF TWO MEDICAL COUNTERMEASURES, GAMMA-TOCOTRIENOL AND AMIFOSTINE, BY A COMBINATION PROPHYLACTIC MODALITY.

This study was designed to evaluate the possible potentiation of survival protection afforded by relatively low-dose amifostine prophylaxis against total body irradiation in combination with a protective, less toxic agent, gamma-tocotrienol (GT3). Mice were administered amifostine and/or GT3, then exposed to 9.2 Gy 60Co γ-irradiation and monitored for survival for 30 days. To investigate cytokine stimulation, mice were administered amifostine or GT3; serum samples were collected and analyzed for cytokines. Survival studies show single treatments of GT3 or amifostine significantly improved survival, compared to the vehicle, and combination treatments resulted in significantly higher survival compared to single treatments. In vivo studies with GT3 confirmed prior work indicating GT3 induces granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). This approach, the prophylactic combination of amifostine and GT3, which act through different mechanisms, shows promise and should be investigated further as a potential countermeasure for acute radiation syndrome.

Amifostine Treatment Mitigates the Damaging Effects of Radiation on Distraction Osteogenesis in the Murine Mandible.

According to the American Society of Clinical Oncology, in 2012, more than 53,000 new cases of head and neck cancers (HNCs) were reported in the United States alone and nearly 12,000 deaths occurred relating to HNC. Although radiotherapy (XRT) has increased survival, the adverse effects can be unrelenting and their management is rarely remedial. Current treatment dictates surgical mandibular reconstruction using free tissue transfer. These complex operations entail extended hospitalizations and attendant complications often lead to delays in initiation of adjuvant therapy, jeopardizing prognosis as well as quality of life. The creation of new bone by distraction osteogenesis (DO) generates a replacement of deficient tissue from local substrate and could have immense potential therapeutic ramifications. Radiotherapy drastically impairs bone healing, precluding its use as a reconstructive method for HNC. We posit that the deleterious effects of XRT on bone formation could be pharmacologically mitigated. To test this hypothesis, we used a rodent model of DO and treated with amifostine, a radioprotectant, to assuage the XRT-induced injury on new bone formation. Amifostine had a profound salutary effect on bone regeneration, allowing the successful implementation of DO as a reconstructive technique. The optimization of bone regeneration in the irradiated mandible has immense potential for translation from the bench to the bedside, providing improved therapeutic options for patients subjected to XRT.

Novel Recombinant Protein FlaA N/C Protects against Radiation Injury via NF-κB Signaling.

There are few safe and effective drugs available that protect healthy tissue against radiation-induced damage, highlighting the need to develop such radioprotective agents. We investigated the mechanism underlying the protective effects of the novel, recombinant, flagellin-like protein FlaA N/C against radiation-induced tissue damage in female BALB/c mice. FlaA N/C treatment increased the levels of several pro-proliferative cytokines while inhibiting apoptosis and reducing inflammation. These effects were accompanied by activation of the nuclear factor κB signaling pathway via direct interaction of FlaA N/C with Toll-like receptor 5, as well as enhanced survival of mice after total-body irradiation compared to that observed with treatment with amifostine, a radioprotective agent that is currently being used in clinical practice. These results indicate that FlaA N/C could be further explored as a possible protector of damage to healthy tissue during radiotherapy.

Prophylactic amifostine prevents a pathologic vascular response in a murine model of expander-based breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Although expander-based breast reconstruction is the most commonly used method of reconstruction worldwide, it continues to be plagued with complication rates as high as 60% when radiotherapy is implemented. We hypothesized that quantitative measures of radiotherapy-induced vascular injury can be mitigated by utilizing amifostine in a murine model of expander-based breast reconstruction. METHODS: 30 rats were divided into three groups: expander placement (Control), expander placement followed by radiotherapy (XRT), and expander placement followed by radiotherapy with amifostine (AMF/XRT). All groups underwent placement of a sub-latissimus tissue expander. After a 45 day recovery period, all groups underwent vascular perfusion and micro-CT analysis. RESULTS: Micro-CT analysis was used to calculate vessel volume fraction (VVF), vessel number (VN), and vessel separation (VSp). A significant increase in VN was seen in the XRT group as compared to the Control (p = 0.021) and the AMF/XRT (p = 0.027). There was no difference between Control and AMF/XRT (p = 0.862). VVF was significantly higher in XRT than either Control (p = 0.043) and AMF/XRT (p = 0.040), however no difference was seen between Control and AMF/XRT (p = 0.980). VSp of XRT was smaller when compared to both Control and AMF/XRT specimens (p = 0.05 and p = 0.048, respectively), and no difference was seen between Control and AMF/XRT (p = 0.339). CONCLUSIONS: Amifostine administered prior to radiotherapy preserved vascular metrics similar to those of non-radiated specimens. Elevated vascularity demonstrated within the XRT group was not seen in either the Control or AMF/XRT groups. These results indicate that amifostine protects soft tissue in our model from a radiotherapy-induced pathologic vascular response.

Prophylactic efficacy of S-2(2-aminoethylamino)ethyl phenyl sulfide (DRDE-07) against sulfur mustard induced lung toxicity in mice.

OBJECTIVE: The present study was planned to investigate the prophylactic efficacy of S-2(2-aminoethylamino)ethyl phenyl sulfide (DRDE-07), against topically applied SM induced pulmonary toxicity in mouse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Animals were pretreated with S-2(2-aminoethylamino)ethyl phenyl sulfide (DRDE-07) (249.4 mg/kg by oral gavage) 30 minutes before SM exposure. The SM (6.48 mg/kg) was applied on hair clipped dorsocaudal region (percutaneous) of the animal. The animals were sacrificed on day 1, 3, 5 and 7. The biochemical changes those were observed in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and lung tissue included protein, LDH, MPO, ß-glucuronidase, MMP-2, MMP-9, activated macrophages, reduced glutathione and lipid peroxidation level. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Pretreatment with DRDE-07 (0.2 LD50) attenuated SM-induced changes at all time point tested. BAL fluid biochemical endpoints indicated epithelial and endothelial cell damages as evidenced by increase in BAL protein, LDH level and increased number of activated macrophages. The increased myeloperoxidase activity and ß-glucuronidase level exhibited the degranulation of neutrophils due to SM toxicity in lung. The zymogrphy analysis of BAL fluid showed a significant increase in matrix metalloproteases (MMP) activity due to inflammatory cells accumulation. CONCLUSION: Thirty minutes pretreatment with DRDE-07 decreased vascular permeability reduced the inflammation and oxidative stress, hence may be recommended as a potential prophylactic agent for SM intoxication.

CCM-AMI, a Polyethylene Glycol Micelle with Amifostine, as an Acute Radiation Syndrome Protectant in C57BL/6 Mice.

Acute radiation syndrome results from radiation exposure, such as in accidental nuclear disasters. Safe and effective radioprotectants, mitigators, and treatment drugs must be developed as medical countermeasures against radiation exposure. Here, the authors evaluated CCM-Ami, a novel polyethylene glycol micelle encapsulated with amifostine, for its radioprotective properties after total-body irradiation from a 60Co source. Male C57BL/6 mice (6-8 wk old) were intravenously injected with 45 mg kg(-1) of CCM-Ami 90 min before exposure to 7.2 and 8.5 Gy irradiation at a dose rate of 0.04 Gy min(-1). Both survival benefit and hematopoietic protection were observed after prophylactic CCM-Ami administration when compared with the effects measured in excipient control and amifostine groups. Pharmacokinetic results showed that after the intravenous injection, the plasma concentration of WR-1065, the active form of amifostine, was higher in CCM-Ami-treated mice than in amifostine-treated mice. These findings suggest that CCM-Ami-mediated hematopoietic protection plays a key role in enhancing survival of mice exposed to radiation toxicity and thus indicate that CCM-Ami is a radioprotectant that can be used safely and effectively in nuclear disasters.

Amifostine Increases FAS and Caspase-3 Expression in Colonic Tissue of Irradiated Mice.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of FASL, FAS and FADD and caspase-3 in oesophagus, stomach and colonic tissues of mice irradiated in vivo by immunohistochemistry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 adult male C57BL mice were distributed into four groups: Ami(-)/Rad(-): Mice received 0.5 ml of 0.9% physiological saline solution (PPS) intraperitioneally (i.p.); Ami(+)/Rad(-): mice received amifostine (400mg/kg i.p.) freshly dissolved in double-distilled water; Ami(-)/Rad(+): mice received 0.5 ml of PSS i.p. 30 min before a single whole-body radiation dose of 7 Gy; Ami(+)/Rad(+): mice received 0.5 ml of an aqueous solution of 400 mg/kg amifostine i.p.30 min prior to irradiation. All groups were assigned into subgroups sacrificed at 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h and 4 h after irradiation. RESULTS: In oesophagus and stomach tissues, we did not observe any difference between Ami(-)/ad(-), Ami(+)/Rad(-), Ami(-)/Rad(+) and Ami(+)/Rad(+) groups in the expression of FASL, FAS and FADD. The colonic tissue was the only to exhibit any difference in the expression of FAS and caspase-3 protein in the Ami(-)/Rad(+)group at 1 and 2 h. Amifostine increased FAS and caspase-3 immunoexpression when compared to the control. Immunoexpression for FASL and FADD was not remarkably different in colonic tissue. CONCLUSION: Taken together, our results demonstrate that amifostine increases FAS and caspase-3 expression in colonic tissue of irradiated mice.