Parasite clearance and protection from Plasmodium falciparum infection (PCPI): a three-arm, parallel, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomised trial of presumptive sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine versus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine versus artesunate monotherapy among asymptomatic children 3-5 years of age in Cameroon.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization 2022 malaria chemoprevention guidelines recommend providing a full course of antimalarial treatment at pre-defined intervals, regardless of malaria status to prevent illness among children resident in moderate to high perennial malaria transmission settings as perennial malaria chemoprevention (PMC) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP). The dhps I431V mutation circulating in West Africa has unknown effect on SP protective efficacy. METHODS: This protocol is for a three-arm, parallel, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomised trial in Cameroon among children randomly assigned to one of three directly-observed treatment groups: (i) Group 1 (n = 450) receives daily artesunate (AS) placebo on days - 7 to -1, then active SP plus placebo amodiaquine (AQ) on day 0, and placebo AQ on days 1 and 2; (ii) Group 2 (n = 250) receives placebo AS on days - 7 to -1, then active SP and AQ on day 0, and active AQ on days 1 and 2; and (iii) Group 3 (n = 200) receives active AS on days - 7 to -1, then placebo SP on day 0 and placebo AQ on days 0 to 2. On days 0, 2, 5, 7, and thereafter weekly until day 28, children provide blood for thick smear slides. Dried blood spots are collected on the same days and weekly from day 28 to day 63 for quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and genotype analyses. DISCUSSION: Our aim is to quantify the chemopreventive efficacy of SP, and SP plus AQ, and measure the effect of the parasite genotypes associated with SP resistance on parasite clearance and protection from infection when exposed to SP chemoprevention. We will report unblinded results including: (i) time-to-parasite clearance among SP and SP plus AQ recipients who were positive on day 0 by qPCR and followed to day 63; (ii) mean duration of SP and SP plus AQ protection against infection, and (iii) mean duration of symptom-free status among SP and SP plus AQ recipients who were parasite free on day 0 by qPCR. Our study is designed to compare the 28-day follow-up of the new WHO malaria chemoprevention efficacy study protocol with extended follow-up to day 63. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06173206; 15/12/2023.

Using the role model approach to optimise caregiver administration of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine amodiaquine to children aged 3-59 months in Burkina Faso, Chad and Togo: findings from an evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) is a World Health Organization-recommended intervention for the prevention of malaria among children at high risk in areas with seasonal transmission. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, SMC drug distribution was rapidly adapted to reduce contact and mitigate the risk of transmission between communities and community distributors, with caregivers administering doses. To address the challenges and find local solutions to improve administration and adherence, the role model approach was designed, implemented and evaluated in selected communities of Burkina Faso, Chad and Togo. This paper describes the results of this evaluation. METHODS: Focus group discussions were held with primary caregivers in all three countries to understand their perceptions of the approach's acceptability and feasibility. In Burkina Faso and Togo, household surveys assessed the characteristics of caregivers reached by role model activities. Key indicators on SMC coverage and adherence allowed for an assessment of caregiver engagement outcomes related to participation in activities. Statistical associations between participation in study's activities and caregiver beliefs related to SMC had been tested. RESULTS: The majority of caregivers believed the approach to have a positive effect on drug administration, with most adopting the promoted strategies. Greater involvement of fathers in drug administration and acknowledgement of their joint responsibility was a notable positive outcome. However, several barriers to participation were noted and there was criticism of the group approach. In Burkina Faso and Togo, end-of-round survey results revealed that 98.4% of respondents agreed the approach improved their knowledge and skills in malaria prevention, while 100% expressed a desire to continue practicing the behaviours learned. However, there was a relatively low level of awareness of the approach among communities. Participation was strongly associated with participants' self-reported belief in ease of remembering to administer, and ease of administering, SMC medicines. CONCLUSION: Caregivers perceived the role model approach to be beneficial in aiding drug administration, with other positive impacts also reported. Replication and scale-up should utilize the most popular communication channels and existing community structures to ensure activities are promoted effectively. A mixture of group and one-on-one approaches should be used where appropriate and feasible.

PBPK-led assessment of antimalarial drugs as candidates for Covid-19: Simulating concentrations at the site of action to inform repurposing strategies.

The urgent need for safe, efficacious, and accessible drug treatments to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prompted a global effort to evaluate drug repurposing opportunities. Pyronaridine and amodiaquine are both components of approved antimalarials with in vitro activity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In vitro activity does not always translate to clinical efficacy across a therapeutic dose range. This study applied available, verified, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for pyronaridine, amodiaquine, and its active metabolite N-desethylamodiaquine (DEAQ) to predict drug concentrations in lung tissue relative to plasma or blood in the default healthy virtual population. Lung exposures were compared to published data across the reported range of in vitro EC50 values against SARS-CoV-2. In the multicompartment permeability-limited PBPK model, the predicted total Cmax in lung mass for pyronaridine was 34.2 µM on Day 3, 30.5-fold greater than in blood (1.12 µM) and for amodiaquine was 0.530 µM, 8.83-fold greater than in plasma (0.060 µM). In the perfusion-limited PBPK model, the DEAQ predicted total Cmax on Day 3 in lung mass (30.2 µM) was 21.4-fold greater than for plasma (1.41 µM). Based on the available in vitro data, predicted drug concentrations in lung tissue for pyronaridine and DEAQ, but not amodiaquine, appeared sufficient to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication. Simulations indicated standard dosing regimens of pyronaridine-artesunate and artesunate-amodiaquine have potential to treat COVID-19. These findings informed repurposing strategies to select the most relevant compounds for clinical investigation in COVID-19. Clinical data for model verification may become available from ongoing clinical studies.

Seasonal malaria chemoprevention and the spread of Plasmodium falciparum quintuple-mutant parasites resistant to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine: a modelling study.

BACKGROUND: Seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine prevents millions of clinical malaria cases in children younger than 5 years in Africa's Sahel region. However, Plasmodium falciparum parasites partially resistant to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (with quintuple mutations) potentially threaten the protective effectiveness of SMC. We evaluated the spread of quintuple-mutant parasites and the clinical consequences. METHODS: We used an individual-based malaria transmission model with explicit parasite dynamics and drug pharmacological models to identify and quantify the influence of factors driving quintuple-mutant spread and predict the time needed for the mutant to spread from 1% to 50% of inoculations for several SMC deployment strategies. We estimated the impact of this spread on SMC effectiveness against clinical malaria. FINDINGS: Higher transmission intensity, SMC coverage, and expanded age range of chemoprevention promoted mutant spread. When SMC was implemented in a high-transmission setting (40% parasite prevalence in children aged 2-10 years) with four monthly cycles to children aged 3 months to 5 years (with 95% initial coverage declining each cycle), the quintuple mutant required 53·1 years (95% CI 50·5-56·0) to spread from 1% to 50% of inoculations. This time increased in lower-transmission settings and reduced by half when SMC was extended to children aged 3 months to 10 years, or reduced by 10-13 years when an additional monthly cycle of SMC was deployed. For the same setting, the effective reduction in clinical cases in children receiving SMC was 79·0% (95% CI 77·8-80·8) and 60·4% (58·6-62·3) during the months of SMC implementation when the quintuple mutant was absent or fixed in the population, respectively. INTERPRETATION: SMC with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine leads to a relatively slow spread of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine-resistant quintuple mutants and remains effective at preventing clinical malaria despite the mutant spread. SMC with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine should be considered in seasonal settings where this mutant is already prevalent. FUNDING: Swiss National Science Foundation and Marie Curie Individual Fellowship.

Increased sensitivity of malaria parasites to common antimalaria drugs after the introduction of artemether-lumefantrine: Implication of policy change and implementation of more effective drugs in fight against malaria.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the Plasmodium falciparum multi-drug resistance protein 1 (Pfmrp1) gene have previously been reported to confer resistance to Artemisinin-based Combination Therapies (ACTs) in Southeast Asia. A total of 300 samples collected from six sites between 2008 and 2019 under an ongoing malaria drug sensitivity patterns in Kenya study were evaluated for the presence of SNPs at Pfmrp1 gene codons: H191Y, S437A, I876V, and F1390I using the Agena MassARRAY® platform. Each isolate was further tested against artemisinin (ART), lumefantrine (LU), amodiaquine (AQ), mefloquine (MQ), quinine (QN), and chloroquine (CQ) using malaria the SYBR Green I-based method to determine their in vitro drug sensitivity. Of the samples genotyped, polymorphism at Pfmrp1 codon I876V was the most frequent, with 59.3% (163/275) mutants, followed by F1390I, 7.2% (20/278), H191Y, 4.0% (6/151), and S437A, 3.3% (9/274). A significant decrease in median 50% inhibition concentrations (IC50s) and interquartile range (IQR) was noted; AQ from 2.996 ng/ml [IQR = 2.604-4.747, n = 51] in 2008 to 1.495 ng/ml [IQR = 0.7134-3.318, n = 40] (P<0.001) in 2019, QN from 59.64 ng/ml [IQR = 29.88-80.89, n = 51] in 2008 to 18.10 ng/ml [IQR = 11.81-26.92, n = 42] (P<0.001) in 2019, CQ from 35.19 ng/ml [IQR = 16.99-71.20, n = 30] in 2008 to 6.699 ng/ml [IQR = 4.976-9.875, n = 37] (P<0.001) in 2019, and ART from 2.680 ng/ml [IQR = 1.608-4.857, n = 57] in 2008 to 2.105 ng/ml [IQR = 1.266-3.267, n = 47] (P = 0.0012) in 2019, implying increasing parasite sensitivity to the drugs over time. However, no significant variations were observed in LU (P = 0.2692) and MQ (P = 0.0939) respectively, suggesting stable parasite responses over time. There was no statistical significance between the mutation at 876 and parasite sensitivity to selected antimalarials tested, suggesting stable sensitivity for the parasites with 876V mutations. These findings show that Kenyan parasite strains are still sensitive to AQ, QN, CQ, ART, LU, and MQ. Despite the presence of Pfmrp1 mutations in parasites among the population.

Impact of seasonal malaria chemoprevention based on the number of medicines doses received on malaria burden among children aged 3-59 months in Nigeria: A propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Seasonal malaria chemoprevention using sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine (sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine on Day 1 and amodiaquine on both Day 2 and Day 3) is delivered to children aged 3-59 months in areas of highly season malaria transmission. While the overall population-level impact of seasonal malaria chemoprevention on malaria control has been documented in various countries and time periods, there is no clear evidence regarding seasonal malaria chemoprevention impact based on the number of medicine doses children receive in one cycle in routine programmatic conditions. METHODS: Data were extracted from Nigeria's routinely collected seasonal malaria chemoprevention end-of-round coverage surveys (2021, 2022). We matched seasonal malaria chemoprevention-targeted children who received specific numbers of seasonal malaria chemoprevention medicines with those who did not receive any doses of seasonal malaria chemoprevention medicines (non-sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine) using multiple sets of propensity score matches. We performed multilevel logistic regression for each matched group to evaluate the association between the number of doses of seasonal malaria chemoprevention medicines and monthly confirmed malaria cases (caregiver-reported malaria infection diagnosed by rapid diagnostic test at a health facility following the penultimate cycle of seasonal malaria chemoprevention). RESULTS: Among 21,621 SMC-targeted children, 9.7% received non-sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine, 0.5% received only Day 1 sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine, 1.0% received Day 1 sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine and either Day 2 amodiaquine or Day 3 amodiaquine (sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine + amodiaquine), and 88.8% received Day 1 sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine and both Day 2 and Day 3 amodiaquine (sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine + amodiaquine + amodiaquine). Children receiving only Day 1 sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine did not have significant lower odds of rapid diagnostic tests-confirmed malaria than those receiving non-sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine (OR 0.77, 0.42-1.42). However, children receiving sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine + amodiaquine had significantly lower odds of rapid diagnostic tests-confirmed malaria than those receiving non-sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.28-0.63). Similarly, children receiving sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine + amodiaquine + amodiaquine also had significantly lower odds of rapid diagnostic test-confirmed malaria than those receiving non-sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.47-0.62). CONCLUSION: Adherence to at least one daily dose of amodiaquine administration following receipt of Day 1 sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine by eligible children is crucial to ensure the effectiveness of seasonal malaria chemoprevention. This demonstrates the importance of enhancing caregiver awareness regarding the importance of amodiaquine and identifying barriers toward amodiaquine administration at the community level.

Lack of selection of antimalarial drug resistance markers after intermittent preventive treatment of schoolchildren (IPTsc) against malaria in northeastern Tanzania.

OBJECTIVE: Intermittent Preventive Treatment of schoolchildren (IPTsc) is recommended by WHO as a strategy to protect against malaria; to explore whether IPTsc with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) or artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ) cause a selection of molecular markers in Plasmodium falciparum genes associated with resistance in children in seven schools in Tanga region, Tanzania. METHODS: SNPs in P. falciparum genes Pfmdr1, Pfexo, Pfkelch13, and Pfcrt and copy number variations in Pfplasmepsin-2 and Pfmdr1 were assessed in samples collected at 12 months (visit 4, n=74) and 20 months (visit 6, n=364) after initiation of IPTsc and compared with the baseline prevalence (n=379). RESULTS: The prevalence of Pfmdr1 N86 and Pfexo 415G was >99% and 0%, respectively without any temporal differences observed. The prevalence of Pfmdr1 184F changed significantly from baseline (52.2%) to visit 6 (64.6%) (χ2=6.11, P=0.013), but no differences were observed between the treatment arms (χ2=0.05, P=0.98). Finally, only minor differences in the amplification of Pfmdr1 were observed; from 10.2% at baseline to 16.7% at visit 6 (χ2=0.98, P=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: The IPTsc strategy does not seem to pose a risk for the selection of markers associated with DP or ASAQ resistance. Continuously and timely surveillance of markers of antimalarial drug resistance is recommended.

Artemether-lumefantrine with or without single-dose primaquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine with or without single-dose tafenoquine to reduce Plasmodium falciparum transmission: a phase 2, single-blind, randomised clinical trial in Ouelessebougou, Mali.

BACKGROUND: Artemether-lumefantrine is widely used for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria; sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine is used for seasonal malaria chemoprevention. We aimed to determine the efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine with and without primaquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine with and without tafenoquine for reducing gametocyte carriage and transmission to mosquitoes. METHODS: In this phase 2, single-blind, randomised clinical trial conducted in Ouelessebougou, Mali, asymptomatic individuals aged 10-50 years with P falciparum gametocytaemia were recruited from the community and randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive either artemether-lumefantrine, artemether-lumefantrine with a single dose of 0·25 mg/kg primaquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine, or sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine with a single dose of 1·66 mg/kg tafenoquine. All trial staff other than the pharmacist were masked to group allocation. Participants were not masked to group allocation. Randomisation was done with a computer-generated randomisation list and concealed with sealed, opaque envelopes. The primary outcome was the median within-person percent change in mosquito infection rate in infectious individuals from baseline to day 2 (artemether-lumefantrine groups) or day 7 (sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine groups) after treatment, assessed by direct membrane feeding assay. All participants who received any trial drug were included in the safety analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05081089. FINDINGS: Between Oct 13 and Dec 16, 2021, 1290 individuals were screened and 80 were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of the four treatment groups (20 per group). The median age of participants was 13 (IQR 11-20); 37 (46%) of 80 participants were female and 43 (54%) were male. In individuals who were infectious before treatment, the median percentage reduction in mosquito infection rate 2 days after treatment was 100·0% (IQR 100·0-100·0; n=19; p=0·0011) with artemether-lumefantrine and 100·0% (100·0-100·0; n=19; p=0·0001) with artemether-lumefantrine with primaquine. Only two individuals who were infectious at baseline infected mosquitoes on day 2 after artemether-lumefantrine and none at day 5. By contrast, the median percentage reduction in mosquito infection rate 7 days after treatment was 63·6% (IQR 0·0-100·0; n=20; p=0·013) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine and 100% (100·0-100·0; n=19; p<0·0001) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine with tafenoquine. No grade 3-4 or serious adverse events occurred. INTERPRETATION: These data support the effectiveness of artemether-lumefantrine alone for preventing nearly all mosquito infections. By contrast, there was considerable post-treatment transmission after sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine; therefore, the addition of a transmission-blocking drug might be beneficial in maximising its community impact. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Antimalarial resistance risk in Mozambique detected by a novel quadruplex droplet digital PCR assay.

While the Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasite continues to cause severe disease globally, Mozambique is disproportionally represented in malaria case totals. Acquisition of copy number variations (CNVs) in the parasite genome contributes to antimalarial drug resistance through overexpression of drug targets. Of interest, piperaquine resistance is associated with plasmepsin 2 and 3 CNVs (pfpmp2 and pfpmp3, respectively), while CNVs in the multidrug efflux pump, multidrug resistance-1 (pfmdr1), increase resistance to amodiaquine and lumefantrine. These antimalarials are partner drugs in artemisinin combination therapies (ACTs) and therefore, CNV detection with accurate and efficient tools is necessary to track ACT resistance risk. Here, we evaluated ~300 clinically derived samples collected from three sites in Mozambique for resistance-associated CNVs. We developed a novel, medium-throughput, quadruplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay to simultaneously quantify the copy number of pfpmp3, pfpmp2, and pfmdr1 loci in these clinical samples. By using DNA from laboratory parasite lines, we show that this nanodroplet-based method is capable of detecting picogram levels of parasite DNA, which facilitates its application for low yield and human host-contaminated clinical surveillance samples. Following ddPCR and the application of quality control standards, we detected CNVs in 13 of 229 high-quality samples (prevalence of 5.7%). Overall, our study revealed a low number of resistance CNVs present in the parasite population across all three collection sites, including various combinations of pfmdr1, pfpmp2, and pfpmp3 CNVs. The potential for future ACT resistance across Mozambique emphasizes the need for continued molecular surveillance across the region.

Efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in mainland Tanzania, 2018.

BACKGROUND: The use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is recommended by the World Health Organization for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Artemether-lumefantrine (AL) is the most widely adopted first-line ACT for uncomplicated malaria in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), including mainland Tanzania, where it was introduced in December 2006. The WHO recommends regular assessment to monitor the efficacy of the first-line treatment specifically considering that artemisinin partial resistance was reported in Greater Mekong sub-region and has been confirmed in East Africa (Rwanda and Uganda). The main aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of AL for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in mainland Tanzania. METHODS: A single-arm prospective anti-malarial drug efficacy trial was conducted in Kibaha, Mlimba, Mkuzi, and Ujiji (in Pwani, Morogoro, Tanga, and Kigoma regions, respectively) in 2018. The sample size of 88 patients per site was determined based on WHO 2009 standard protocol. Participants were febrile patients (documented axillary temperature ≥ 37.5 °C and/or history of fever during the past 24 h) aged 6 months to 10 years. Patients received a 6-dose AL regimen by weight twice a day for 3 days. Clinical and parasitological parameters were monitored during 28 days of follow-up to evaluate the drug efficacy and safety. RESULTS: A total of 653 children were screened for uncomplicated malaria and 349 (53.7%) were enrolled between April and August 2018. Of the enrolled children, 345 (98.9%) completed the 28 days of follow-up or attained the treatment outcomes. There were no early treatment failures, but recurrent infections were higher in Mkuzi (35.2%) and Ujiji (23%). By Kaplan-Meier analysis of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) uncorrected adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) ranged from 63.4% in Mkuzi to 85.9% in Mlimba, while PCR-corrected ACPR on day 28 varied from 97.6% in Ujiji to 100% in Mlimba. The drug was well tolerated; the commonly reported adverse events were cough, runny nose, and abdominal pain. No serious adverse event was reported. CONCLUSION: This study showed that AL had adequate efficacy and safety for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria. The high number of recurrent infections were mainly due to new infections, indicating the necessity of utilizing alternative artemisinin-based combinations, such as artesunate amodiaquine, which provide a significantly longer post-treatment prophylactic effect.

Amodiaquine Nonspecifically Binds Double Stranded and Three-Way Junction DNA Structures.

The 4-aminoquinoline class of compounds includes the important antimalarial compounds amodiaquine and chloroquine. Despite their medicinal importance, the mode of action of these compounds is poorly understood. In a previous study we observed these compounds, as well as quinine and mefloquine, tightly bind the DNA cocaine-binding aptamer. Here, we further explore the range of nucleic acid structures bound by these compounds. To gauge a wide range of binding affinities, we used isothermal titration calorimetry to explore high affinity binding (nM to tens of µM) and NMR spectroscopy to assay weak binding biding in the hundreds of micromolar range. We find that amodiaquine tightly binds all double stranded DNA structures explored. Mefloquine binds double stranded DNA duplex molecules tightly and weakly associates with a three-way junction DNA construct. Quinine and chloroquine only weakly bind duplex DNA but do not tightly bind any of the DNA constructs explored. A simulation of the free energy of binding of these ligands to the Dickerson-Drew dodecamer resulted in an excellent agreement between the simulated and experimental free energy. These results provide new insight into the DNA binding of clinically important antimalarial compounds and may play a role in future development of new antimalarials.

Efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in mainland Tanzania, 2019.

BACKGROUND: Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) has been a major contributor to the substantial reductions in global malaria morbidity and mortality over the last decade. In Tanzania, artemether-lumefantrine (AL) was introduced as the first-line treatment for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in 2006. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends regular assessment and monitoring of the efficacy of the first-line treatment, specifically considering that artemisinin resistance has been confirmed in the Greater Mekong sub-region. This study's main aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of AL for treating uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in Tanzania. METHODS: This was a single-arm prospective antimalarial drug efficacy trial conducted in four of the eight National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP) sentinel sites in 2019. The trial was carried out in outpatient health facilities in Karume-Mwanza region, Ipinda-Mbeya region, Simbo-Tabora region, and Nagaga-Mtwara region. Children aged six months to 10 years with microscopy confirmed uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria who met the inclusion criteria were recruited based on the WHO protocol. The children received AL (a 6-dose regimen of AL twice daily for three days). Clinical and parasitological parameters were monitored during follow-up over 28 days to evaluate drug efficacy. RESULTS: A total of 628 children were screened for uncomplicated malaria, and 349 (55.6%) were enrolled between May and September 2019. Of the enrolled children, 343 (98.3%) completed the 28-day follow-up or attained the treatment outcomes. There were no early treatment failures; recurrent infections during follow-up were common at two sites (Karume 29.5%; Simbo 18.2%). PCR-corrected adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) by survival analysis to AL on day 28 of follow-up varied from 97.7% at Karume to 100% at Ipinda and Nagaga sites. The commonly reported adverse events were cough, skin pallor, and abdominal pain. The drug was well tolerated, and no serious adverse event was reported. CONCLUSION: This study showed that AL had adequate efficacy and safety for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Tanzania in 2019. The high recurrent infections were mainly due to new infections, highlighting the potential role of introducing alternative artemisinin-based combinations that offer improved post-treatment prophylaxis, such as artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ).

Exploring the modulatory influence on the antimalarial activity of amodiaquine using scaffold hybridisation with ferrocene integration.

Amodiaquine (AQ) is a potent antimalarial drug used in combination with artesunate as part of artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) for malarial treatment. Due to the rising emergence of resistant malaria parasites, some of which have been reported for ACT, the usefulness of AQ as an efficacious therapeutic drug is threatened. Employing the organometallic hybridisation approach, which has been shown to restore the antimalarial activity of chloroquine in the form of an organometallic hybrid clinical candidate ferroquine (FQ), the present study utilises this strategy to modulate the biological performance of AQ by incorporating ferrocene. Presently, we have conceptualised ferrocenyl AQ derivatives and have developed facile, practical routes for their synthesis. A tailored library of AQ derivatives was assembled and their antimalarial activity evaluated against chemosensitive (NF54) and multidrug-resistant (K1) strains of the malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum. The compounds generally showed enhanced or comparable activities to those of the reference clinical drugs chloroquine and AQ, against both strains, with higher selectivity for the sensitive phenotype, mostly in the double-digit nanomolar IC50 range. Moreover, representative compounds from this series show the potential to block malaria transmission by inhibiting the growth of stage II/III and V gametocytes in vitro. Preliminary mechanistic insights also revealed hemozoin inhibition as a potential mode of action.

Efficacy of artesunate-amodiaquine for treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in mainland Tanzania.

BACKGROUND: Diversification of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is suggested as one of the strategies that can be used to contain artemisinin resistance. Artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ) is one of the artemisinin-based combinations that can be used in the diversification strategy as an alternative first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in mainland Tanzania. There is however limited data on the efficacy of ASAQ in mainland Tanzania. This study assessed the efficacy of ASAQ for treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in selected sentinel sites for therapeutic efficacy studies in mainland Tanzania. METHODS: Between December 2018 and March 2020, children aged between 6 months and 10 years, attending at Nagaga, Mkuzi, and Mlimba primary health facilities, and with suspected uncomplicated malaria infection were screened for eligibility to participate in the study. Malaria infection was screened using microscopy. Children with uncomplicated P. falciparum monoinfection and who fulfilled all other inclusion criteria, and had none of the exclusion criteria, according to the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, were treated with ASAQ. Follow-up visits were scheduled on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 or on any day of recurrent infection for clinical and laboratory assessment. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-corrected cure rate on day 28 was the primary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 264 children, 88 in each of the three study sites (Mlimba, Mkuzi and Nagaga health facilities) were enrolled and treated with ASAQ. The ASAQ PCR-corrected cure rate was 100% at all the three study sites. None of the participants had early treatment failure or late clinical failure. Furthermore, none of the participants had a serious adverse event. CONCLUSION: ASAQ was highly efficacious for the treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in mainland Tanzania, therefore, it can be deployed as an alternative first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria as part of diversification strategy to contain the spread of partial artemisinin resistance in the country.

Therapeutic response to four artemisinin-based combination therapies in Angola, 2021.

Monitoring antimalarial efficacy is important to detect the emergence of parasite drug resistance. Angola conducts in vivo therapeutic efficacy studies (TESs) every 2 years in its fixed sentinel sites in Benguela, Lunda Sul, and Zaire provinces. Children with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria were treated with artemether-lumefantrine (AL), artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ), dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP), or artesunate-pyronaridine (ASPY) and followed for 28 (AL and ASAQ) or 42 days (DP and ASPY) to assess clinical and parasitological response to treatment. Two drugs were sequentially assessed in each site in February-July 2021. The primary indicator was the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the PCR-corrected efficacy at the end of the follow-up period. A total of 622 patients were enrolled in the study and 590 (95%) participants reached a study endpoint. By day 3, ≥98% of participants were slide-negative in all study sites and arms. After PCR correction, day 28 AL efficacy was 88.0% (95% CI: 82%-95%) in Zaire and 94.7% (95% CI: 90%-99%) in Lunda Sul. For ASAQ, day 28 efficacy was 92.0% (95% CI: 87%-98%) in Zaire and 100% in Lunda Sul. Corrected day 42 efficacy was 99.6% (95% CI: 99%-100%) for ASPY and 98.3% (95% CI: 96%-100%) for DP in Benguela. High day 3 clearance rates suggest no clinical evidence of artemisinin resistance. This was the fourth of five rounds of TES in Angola showing a corrected AL efficacy <90% in a site. For Zaire, AL has had an efficacy <90% in 2013, 2015, and 2021. ASAQ, DP, and ASPY are appropriate choices as artemisinin-based combination therapies in Angola.

Monitoring of adverse drug reactions during seasonal malaria chemoprevention campaigns in children aged 3­59 months in Burkina Faso / Surveillance des effets indésirables lors des campagnes de la chimioprévention du paludisme saisonnier chez les enfants de 3-59 mois au Burkina Faso

Introduction: Seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) by mass administration of sulfadoxine pyrimethamine + amodiaquine (SPAQ) reduces the burden of malaria in children aged 3­59 months. The occurrence of adverse drug reaction (ADR) may affect the success of this intervention. There are few studies of SMC adverse event surveillance in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in Burkina Faso, a highly endemic country. Our main objective was to characterize the ADRs reported during SMC campaigns in Burkina Faso. Secondly, we evaluated the performance of the pharmacovigilance integrated into the SMC program in order to support safe administration of SMC. Method: This was a retrospective descriptive study of SMC individual case safety reports recorded in VigiBase® in Burkina Faso from 2014 to 2021. We used the P-method for the analysis of preventable serious adverse drug reactions and WHO criteria for assessing the performance of pharmacovigilance integrated into the SMC program. Results: A total of 1,105 SMC individual case safety reports were registered in VigiBase® for 23,311,453 doses of SPAQ given between 2014 and 2021. No pharmacovigilance signal was detected. The number of serious cases was 101, of which 23 (22.8%) were preventable. In 38.1% of children, the occurrence of ADRs led to discontinuation of SMC treatment. Vomiting was the most frequently reported adverse drug reaction (48.0%). The proportion of children whose treatment was discontinued due to vomiting was 42.7%, while the proportion of treatment discontinuation for other ADRs was 32.8% (p = 0.01). The SMC program contributed at 46.2% to the national pharmacovigilance database. The reporting rate was 0.03 per 1,000 exposed children in 2021. The median completeness score of the ICSRs was 0.7 (IQR: 0.5­0.7), and the median time to register the ICSRs in VigiBase® was 204 (IQR: 143­333) days. Conclusions: Post-drug administration vomiting may interfere with the purpose of SMC. Measures to manage this adverse drug reaction should be taken to improve the success of the SMC program. Based on the information on reporting time and reporting rate, spontaneous reporting should be supported by active surveillance, including cohort event monitoring, in Burkina Faso.

Introduction: La chimioprévention du paludisme saisonnier (CPS) par l'administration en masse de la sulfadoxine-pyriméthamine + amodiaquine (SPAQ) permet de réduire le fardeau du paludisme chez les enfants de 3-59 mois. La survenue d'effets indésirables (EI) pourrait nuire au succès de cette intervention. Il existe peu d'études sur la surveillance des EI de la CPS en Afrique subsaharienne et plus particulièrement au Burkina Faso, pays de forte endémicité palustre. Notre objectif principal était de caractériser les effets indésirables notifiés au cours des campagnes CPS au Burkina Faso. Secondairement, nous avons évalué la performance de la pharmacovigilance intégrée au programme de CPS dans le but de soutenir la sécurité d'administration de la CPS. Méthodes: Nous avons réalisé une analyse rétrospective à visée descriptive des rapports d'effets indésirables de la CPS enregistrés dans VigiBase® entre le 1er janvier 2014 et le 31 décembre 2021. Nous avons utilisé la P-method pour l'analyse de l'évitabilité des effets indésirables graves et les critères de l'OMS pour évaluer la performance de la pharmacovigilance intégrée au programme de CPS. Résultats: Au total, 1 105 cas individuels de rapports de sécurité de la CPS ont été analysés dans VigiBase® pour 23 311 453 doses administrées. Aucun signal de pharmacovigilance n'a été détecté. Le nombre des cas graves était de 101, dont 23 (22,8 %) évitables. Chez 38,1 % des enfants, la survenue des EI a occasionné l'arrêt de l'administration du traitement de la CPS. Le vomissement était l'effet indésirable le plus fréquemment rapporté (48,0 %). La proportion d'enfants dont le traitement a été arrêté pour motif de vomissement était de 42,7 %, tandis que la proportion d'arrêts de traitement pour les autres EI était de 32,8 % (p=0,01). La pharmacovigilance de la CPS a contribué à 46,2 % à l'alimentation de la base de données nationale de pharmacovigilance. Le taux de notification était de 0,03 pour 1 000 enfants exposés en 2021. Le score d'exhaustivité médian des rapports était de 0,7 (P25-P75 : 0,5-0,7) et le délai médian d'enregistrement des rapports dans VigiBase® était de 204 (P25-P75 : 143-333) jours. Conclusions: Les vomissements peuvent nuire à l'objectif de la CPS. Des mesures de gestion de cet effet indésirable doivent être prises pour améliorer le succès de la CPS. Au regard des informations sur le délai de notification et le taux de notification, la notification spontanée devrait être soutenue par une surveillance active, notamment une « cohort event monitoring ¼ au Burkina Faso.

Randomized Field Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention in School-Aged Children in Bandiagara, Mali.

BACKGROUND: Owing to the increased cases of malaria in older children, the World Health Organization has recently recommended extending seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) to children >5 years of age and using other effective drugs for malaria. In this study, we report the safety and efficacy of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PQ) for SMC in school-aged children in Mali. METHOD: This randomized, controlled trial included 345 participants aged 6-15 years randomized to receive DHA-PQ, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine (SP-AQ), or no chemoprevention (albendazole) at a 1:1:1 ratio. Four rounds of SMC were conducted from September to December 2021. The participants were assessed 7 days after each round for safety and efficacy of the interventions. RESULTS: Abdominal pain (11.8% vs 29.2%), headache (11.2% vs 19.2%), and vomiting (5.7% vs 15.2%) were frequently reported in the DHA-PQ and SP-AQ arms. On Day 120 of follow up, the incidence of clinical malaria was 0.01 episodes/person-month in the DHA-PQ and SP-AQ arms and 0.17 episodes/person-month in the control arm (P < .0001). Gametocytes were detected in 37 participants in all arms. CONCLUSIONS: Children in DHA-PQ arm reported less adverse events compared to the SP-AQ arm. Both drugs were effective against clinical malaria and infection.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention.

Seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) for children under 5 years of age for up to four monthly cycles during malaria transmission season was recommended by the WHO in 2012 and has been implemented in 13 countries in the Sahel, reaching more than 30 million children annually. Malaria control programs implementing SMC have asked the WHO to consider expanding the age range or number of monthly cycles. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of SMC among children up to 15 years of age and up to six monthly cycles. Twelve randomized studies were included, with outcomes stratified by age (< 5/≥ 5 years), by three or four versus five or six cycles, and by drug where possible. Drug regimens included sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine + amodiaquine, amodiaquine-artesunate, and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine + artesunate. Included studies were all conducted in Sahelian countries in which high-grade resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was rare and in zones with parasite prevalence ranging from 1% to 79%. Seasonal malaria chemoprevention resulted in substantial reductions in uncomplicated malaria incidence measured during that transmission season (rate ratio: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.25-0.29 among children < 5 years; rate ratio: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.25-0.30 among children ≥ 5 years) and in the prevalence of malaria parasitemia measured within 4-6 weeks from the final SMC cycle (risk ratio: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.34-0.43 among children < 5 years; risk ratio: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.11-0.48 among children ≥ 5 years). In high-transmission zones, SMC resulted in a moderately reduced risk of any anemia (risk ratio: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.72-0.83 among children < 5 years; risk ratio: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.52-0.95 among children ≥ 5 years [one study]). Children < 10 years of age had a moderate reduction in severe malaria (risk ratio: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.37-0.76) but no evidence of a mortality reduction. The evidence suggests that in areas in which sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and amodiaquine remained efficacious, SMC effectively reduced malaria disease burden among children both < 5 and ≥ 5 years old and that the number of cycles should be commensurate with the length of the transmission season, up to six cycles.

Novel amodiaquine analogues to treat cervical cancer and microbial infection in the future.

Aim: To synthesize and explore the therapeutic potential of amodiaquine analogues. Methodology: New promising analogues were synthesized by nucleophilic substitution at the 4-amino position and were characterized using 1H NMR, 13C NMR and FT-IR spectroscopic techniques. Results: Antibacterial and cytotoxic screening revealed the high potency of these compounds; analogue AS1 had an 34.3 ± 0.18 mm zone of inhibition against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Excellent activity against fungal strains, that is, Candida albicans (39.6 ± 0.23 mm) was shown by analogue AS2. Analogue AS1 had an IC50 = 4.2 µg/ml against the HeLa cell line (cervical cancer) and binding energy against 5GWK (-8.32688 kcal/mol), 1PFK (-6.4780 kcal/mol) and 1TUP (-6.5279 kcal/mol) in the docking study. Conclusion: The obtained results reveal that these analogues exhibit potent antimicrobial and cytotoxic potential.

Variation in neutrophil levels and artemisinin-based combination therapy efficacy in West-Africa.

INTRODUCTION: Polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) are involved in pathogen clearance by phagocytosis. However, the role of PMNs in the efficacy of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is poorly understood. METHODOLOGY: In a prospective longitudinal in vivo study, neutrophil rates were compared with malaria carriage after treatment with different ACTs: Artemether - lumefantrine (AL), Artesunate - amodiaquine (ASAQ), Dihydroartemisinin - piperaquine (DP) or Pyronaridine artesunate (PA). The study cases were classified as having neutropenia, normal neutrophil levels or neutrophilia depending on the level of neutrophils in the blood. This study included 3148 patients and was analyzed using R. RESULTS: On day 7, only four patients in the neutropenia group and treated with AL had a malaria positive blood smear based on microscopy. On day 28, the rate of recurrent parasitemia in the AL arm was significantly higher in neutropenia patients (50.9%) than in patients with normal rates of neutrophils (43.1%) or in those with neutrophilia (6.0%) (p < 0.001). In ASAQ arm, the rate of recurrent Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia was 58.8% in the neutropenia group versus 29.4% in patients with normal rates of neutrophils and 11.8% in patients with neutrophilia (p < 0.001). No patient treated with DP with normal neutrophil counts or neutrophilia was carrying malaria parasites on day 28. Among the 15 patients with parasitemia on day 28 in the PA arm, 11 (73.33%) had neutropenia while 4 (26.67%) had a normal neutrophil count (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with neutropenia had higher rates of recurrent P. falciparum parasitemia after ACT.