Perioperative anaphylactic shock caused by propofol.

Perioperative anaphylaxis is rare and the diagnosis is difficult to distinguish from normal side effects from anaesthesia. Anaesthetists should be able to diagnose anaphylaxis and treat promptly with adrenaline and fluids. Allergy investigation should be performed subsequently. This is a case report of perioperative anaphylaxis to propofol. Propofol contains refined soya oil and egg lecithin, but no connection between allergy to soy, egg or peanut and allergy to propofol has been proven, and international guidelines recommend that propofol can be used in patients with these food allergies.

Evaluation of treatment and long-term management of anaphylaxis in pediatric departments of Greece: a 2-year nationwide survey.

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis proportions of incidence are increasing globally. However, limited data are available regarding anaphylaxis in the pediatric population of Greece. PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate management of anaphylaxis in Greek pediatric departments. METHODS: We performed a questionnaire-based study of children aged less than 16 years presenting with anaphylaxis in 10 national pediatric hospitals over a period of 2 years. Management of anaphylaxis was assessed prior to and after an informative intervention. RESULTS: In all, 127 cases of anaphylaxis were identified. Epinephrine was administered in almost half of all cases (51.2%), predominantly through intramuscular route (88.5%), while the majority of anaphylaxis patients were treated with antihistamines (92.9%) and corticosteroids (70.1%). Epinephrine was more likely administered by physicians if the elicitor was a drug (P < 0.003). Regarding long-term management, an epinephrine auto-injector was prescribed in 66.9% of patients. Follow-up information was available for most of the patients (92.9%), the majority of whom (76.3%) were referred to an allergist. More than half of these patients (63.6%) had a documented allergy follow-up, which identified a causative allergen in 53.3% of cases. No statistically significant differences were recorded prior to and after the intervention regarding management of anaphylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide study highlighted the necessity of further improvement in terms of anaphylaxis treatment and secondary prevention measures. This presupposes appropriate education and training of healthcare professionals, thus contributing to proper and comprehensive care of the pediatric population.

Alpha-gal syndrome: when treatment of hypovolemic shock can lead to anaphylaxis.

Delayed anaphylaxis after ingestion of red meat because of galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (alpha-gal) syndrome has increased in recent years. The mechanism involves an immunoglobulin E reaction to alpha-gal, a molecule found in mammalian meat, dairy products, medications and excipients containing mammalian-derived components, and tick salivary glycans. Sensitization occurs due to the bite of a lone star tick and the transmission of alpha-gal molecules into person's bloodstream. We describe a case of alpha-gal syndrome with severe food, drug, and perioperative allergy in which anaphylaxis with hypovolemic shock occurred immediately after an emergency surgical procedure, when a gelatin-containing drug was injected. This case study confirms that the clinical manifestations of alpha-gal syndrome could be different depending on the route of administration, with immediate reactions if an alpha-gal-containing drug is injected and delayed type allergic manifestations occurring several hours after oral intake. The purpose of this report is to highlight the importance of risk communication in case of exposure to medical products and surgical procedures of patients with alpha-gal syndrome and to encourage drug manufacturers to indicate clearly the origin of excipients in product literature.

Tablet allergen immunotherapy: the anaphylaxis issue.

For the first time 15 years ago, tablet allergen immunotherapy (T-AIT) formulations were approved by regulatory agencies for treating allergic rhinitis caused by grass pollen in adults and children aged >5 years. Extensive evidences existed about effectiveness and safety of AIT. However, the safety profile is particularly compelling in children. Generally, T-AIT causes local reactions, mostly in the oral cavity, that are usually mild-to-moderate and often self-resolving. However, systemic allergic reactions are also observed with T-AIT, anaphylaxis representing the most fearsome adverse event, considering that it occurs in subjects treated for allergic rhinitis. Therefore, we conducted a literature search of patients reporting anaphylaxis because of T-AIT. Nine cases of anaphylactic reactions were reported in literature. Notably, no death was reported using T-AIT. This outcome was very important as it underscored the substantial safety of T-AIT. However, T-AIT deserves careful attention, mainly in the pediatric population. In this regard, after the first report of anaphylactic reaction at the first administration of T-AIT, manufacturers recommended that the first dose should be administered in a medical facility in the presence of staff with experience in managing anaphylaxis and the patient should be observed for at least 30 min. Interestingly, reported anaphylactic reactions were due to grass pollen extracts, with no report concerning other allergen extracts. However, it is relevant to note that anaphylactic reactions because of T-AIT are not reported in recent years.

Developing an AI-based prediction model for anaphylactic shock from injection drugs using Japanese real-world data and chemical structure-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to develop an AI-based prediction model for injection drugs that cause anaphylactic shock using Japanese Real-World Data (JADER database) and chemical structure-based analysis. METHODS: Data sourced from the JADER database included adverse drug reaction reports from April 2004 to December 2020. Only drugs with an adverse reaction named "anaphylactic shock" were selected for analysis. For model building, various models were constructed to predict anaphylactic shock-inducing drugs, such as logistic regression, LASSO, XGBoost, RF, SVM, and NNW. These models used chemical properties and structural similarities as feature variables. Dimension reduction was applied using principal component analysis. The dataset was split into training (80%) and validation (20%) sets. Six different models were trained and optimized through fivefold cross-validation. RESULTS: From April 2004 to December 2020, 947 drugs with the adverse reaction name "anaphylactic shock" were extracted from the JADER database. 320 drugs were excluded due to analytical challenges, and another 400 were removed due to their administration route. 227 drugs were finalized as target medicines. For model validation, the performance of each model was evaluated based on metrics like AUCs of ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity. Additionally, two ensemble models, constructed from the six models were assessed using bootstrap sampling. Interestingly, it was identified that mepivacaine structural similarity had the highest importance in the final model. CONCLUSIONS: The study successfully developed an AI-based prediction model for anaphylactic shock inducing-injection drugs. The model would offer potential for drug safety evaluation and anaphylactic shock risk assessment.

Consideration for alpha-gal syndrome in two critically ill persons with group O blood who received group B plasma.

BACKGROUND: The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has reported increasing rates of alpha-gal syndrome, an allergic response after meat ingestion (AGS). AGS has been associated with prior exposure to tick bites or other biologics characterized by a life-threatening immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated hypersensitivity to galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (alpha-gal) an oligosaccharide structurally similar to the group B antigen on red blood cells (RBC) found in most non-primate mammalian meat and products derived from these mammals. In 2023, Transfusion reported 3 group O recipients of group B plasma in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area with no history of meat allergy who had anaphylactic transfusion reactions compatible with AGS. AIMS: We investigated allergic reactions in 2 additional patients who received ABO minor-incompatible blood products at 2 hospitals in the D.C. area during fall 2023. METHODS: For both patients, a medical chart review was performed and IgE levels to alpha-gal were measured. RESULTS: The first patient, a 64-year-old, O-positive patient status post heart transplant with no known allergies, was admitted with acute COVID-19 induced antibody-mediated transplant rejection and placed on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). While undergoing plasma exchange (PLEX) (50% albumin/50% fresh frozen plasma (FFP)), the patient tolerated 2 units of group O FFP and 1 unit of group A FFP before becoming hemodynamically unstable during transfusion of 1 unit of B-positive FFP. PLEX was stopped. The patient later died of sepsis from underlying causes. The second patient, a 57-year-old O-positive man with a history of melanoma and neuro fibromatosis type 1, was undergoing an abdominal resection including transfusion of 3 units of O-positive RBC when he suffered hypotension and ventricular tachycardia requiring intraoperative code after receiving 2 units of group B FFP. Hiveswere noted after resuscitation. The patient had a history of tick bites but no known allergies. He is alive 5 months after the possible allergic event. Both patients had full transfusion reaction evaluations and immunology testing results above the positive cutoff for anti-alpha-gal IgE. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Two patients with O-positive blood and no known allergies experience danaphyl axis after transfusion with group B FFP. The symptoms cannot definitively be imputed to an allergic transfusion reaction, but the presence of IgE against alpha-gal supports an association. Medicating patients with antihistamines and IV steroids pre-transfusion may prevent allergic reactions. Restricting group B plasma-containing products (plasma, platelets, cryoprecipitate) for patients who experience AGS-like symptoms may be considered.

Knowledge mapping and global trends of drug hypersensitivity from 2013 to 2023: A bibliometric analysis.

BACKGROUND: Drug hypersensitivity is a major global public health issue with a significant increase in prevalence in populations. Here, we provide a deep insight into the frontier hotspot and future direction in the field of drug hypersensitivity. METHODS: A knowledge map is portrayed based on publications related to drug hypersensitivity from Web of Science Core Collection using CiteSpace. Co-occurrence relationships of countries, institutes, authors, journals, references, and keywords are constructed. According to the co-occurrence relationships, hotspots and future trends are overviewed. RESULTS: The United States ranked first in the world and China with the second highest publications was the only developing country. Torres, Mayorga, and Blanca were highly productive authors. Harvard University was the institution with the most research publications. Keywords co-occurrence analysis suggested applications in emerging causes, potential mechanisms, and clinical diagnosis as the research hotspots and development frontiers. CONCLUSION: Research on drug hypersensitivity is in a rapid development stage and an emerging trend in reports of anaphylaxis to polyethylene glycols is identified. Developing algorithms for understanding the standardization process of culprit drugs, clinical manifestations, and diagnostic methods will be the focus of future direction. In addition, a better understanding of the mechanisms to culprit drugs with immunological precise phenotypic definitions and high-throughput platforms is needed.

Protective role of protease-activated receptor-2 in anaphylaxis model mice.

Anaphylaxis is a severe life-threatening hypersensitivity reaction induced by mast cell degranulation. Among the various mediators of mast cells, little is known about the role of tryptase. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the role of protease-activating receptor-2 (PAR-2), a receptor activated by tryptase, in murine anaphylactic models using PAR-2-deficient mice and newly generated tryptase-deficient mice. Anaphylaxis was induced by IgE-dependent and IgE-independent mast cell degranulation in mice. PAR-2 deficiency exacerbated the decrease in body temperature and hypotension during anaphylaxis; however, the number of skin mast cells, degree of mast cell degranulation, and systemic and local vascular hyperpermeability were comparable in PAR-2 knockout and wild-type mice. Nitric oxide, which is produced by endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), is an indispensable vasodilator in anaphylaxis. In the lungs of anaphylactic mice, PAR-2 deficiency promoted eNOS expression and phosphorylation, suggesting a protective effect of PAR-2 against anaphylaxis by downregulating eNOS activation and expression. Based on the hypothesis that the ligand for PAR-2 in anaphylaxis is mast cell tryptase, tryptase-deficient mice were generated using CRISPR-Cas9. In wild-type mice, the PAR-2 antagonist exacerbated the body temperature drop due to anaphylaxis; however, the effect of the PAR-2 antagonist was abolished in tryptase-deficient mice. These results suggest that tryptase is a possible ligand of PAR-2 in anaphylaxis and that the tryptase/PAR-2 pathway attenuates the anaphylactic response in mice.

Revisiting dexamethasone use in the pediatric emergency department.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Dexamethasone is an essential treatment for common pediatric inflammatory, airway, and respiratory conditions. We aim to provide up-to-date recommendations for treatment of anaphylaxis, croup, coronavirus disease, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, and asthma with dexamethasone for use in the pediatric emergency department. RECENT FINDINGS: Literature largely continues to support the use of dexamethasone in most of the above conditions, however, recommendations for dosing and duration are evolving. SUMMARY: The findings discussed in this review will enable pediatric emergency medicine providers to use dexamethasone effectively as treatment of common pediatric conditions and minimize the occurrence of side-effects caused by gratuitous corticosteroid use.

A retrospective audit of adult and paediatric anaphylaxis management from two Australian metropolitan mixed emergency departments.

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening allergic reaction, with presentations to emergency departments (EDs) increasing across Australia. Understanding the features of those presenting with anaphylaxis and aspects related to its optimal clinical management across the admission, treatment and discharge settings is needed to minimise its impact. We aimed to evaluate the nature and management of presentations related to anaphylaxis across two Australian EDs. METHODS: Retrospective audit of paediatric and adult patients presenting to a community or tertiary level ED with anaphylaxis from 1 May 2018 to 30 April 2019. Data extracted from medical records included demographic characteristics, causative agents, clinical features, treatments administered across community, ambulance or ED settings, as well as post-discharge care arrangements including provision of Adrenaline Auto-Injector (AAI) and Allergy/Anaphylaxis Action Plan (AAP). RESULTS: A total of 369 (107 paediatric and 262 adult) ED presentations were identified. A total of 94 (36%) adult and 46 (43%) paediatric patients received pre-hospital adrenaline, with a further 91 (35%) adult and 29 (27%) paediatric patients receiving a dose of adrenaline in the ED. The most commonly administered treatment in ED were corticosteroids, given to 157 (60%) adult and 55 (51%) paediatric patients. Among those requiring an AAI for discharge, 123/210 (59%) adult and 57/91 (63%) of paediatric patients left hospital with an AAI. In contrast, among those requiring an allergy/anaphylaxis action plan (AAP) on discharge, 61/206 (30%) adult and 30/90 (33%) of paediatric patients left hospital with one. Factors associated with an increased likelihood of receiving AAI on discharge in paediatric and adult patients included receipt of any adrenaline, receipt of two or more doses of adrenaline, and longer duration of hospital stay. Adults presenting within business hours were more likely to be discharged with AAI, but no such difference was observed for paediatric patients. Similar findings were evident for provision of AAP on discharge. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate the need to improve assessment and treatment in the ED. In particular, the observed large variability in provision of AAI and AAP on discharge presents opportunities to explore strategies to improve awareness and provision of these critical components of post-discharge care.

Detecting epinephrine auto-injector shortages in Finland 2016-2022: Log-data analysis of online information seeking.

INTRODUCTION: Medicine shortages prevail as a worldwide problem causing life-threatening situations for adults and children. Epinephrine auto-injectors are used for serious allergic reactions called anaphylaxis, and alternative auto-injectors are not always available in pharmacies. Healthcare professionals in Finland use the dedicated internet source, Physician's Database (PD), when seeking medical information in practice, while Health Library (HL) provides health information for citizens (S1 Data). The objectives were to assess whether (1) professionals' searches for epinephrine auto-injectors and (2) citizens' anaphylaxis article openings relate to epinephrine shortages in Finland. METHODS: Monthly log data on epinephrine auto-injectors (EpiPen®, Jext®, Emerade®) from PD and on openings of anaphylaxis articles from HL were collected during 2016-2022. Professionals' searches of seven auto-injectors and citizens' openings of four anaphylaxis articles were compared to information on epinephrine shortages reported by Finnish Medicines Agency. Professionals' auto-injector prescriptions provided by Social Insurance Institution were also assessed. RESULTS: Total searches in EpiPen® (N = 111,740), Jext® (N = 25,631), and Emerade® (N = 18,329) could be analyzed during 2016-2022. EpiPen® only could visually show seasonal patterns during summertime, peaking vigorously in the summer of 2018 when the major EpiPen® shortage appeared worldwide. Anaphylaxis articles equaled 2,030,855 openings altogether. Openings of one anaphylaxis article ("Bites and Stings") peaked during summertime, while another article ("Anaphylactic Reaction") peaked only once (three-fold increase) at the end of 2020 when COVID-19 vaccinations started, and auto-injector prescriptions were lowest. Fifty EpiPen®, one Jext®, and twelve Emerade® shortages were reported. Almost a two-fold increase in peaks of auto-injector prescriptions was found during summertime. CONCLUSION: This study shows that (1) epinephrine shortages related to professionals' searching for auto-injectors, and (2) citizens' information seeking on anaphylaxis related to summertime and shortages with lesser prescriptions. Therefore, the dedicated internet databases aimed at professionals and citizens could be used as additional information sources to detect anaphylactic reactions and auto-injector shortages.

[Retrospective analysis of perioperative anaphylactic shock induced by cefuroxime].

This study investigated the characteristics and frequency of perioperative anaphylactic shock induced by cefuroxime, so as to provide a reference for the safe and rational use of cefuroxime in the perioperative period. Cases of perioperative anaphylactic shock caused by cefuroxime in our hospital from 2011 to 2021 were extracted from the Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring System. Literature reporting adverse drug reactions (ADR) including cefuroxime-induced anaphylactic shock in perioperative settings was collected from the CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, PubMed, and Web of Science databases from their respective inception to May 2022. Statistical analysis was performed for all cases of cefuroxime-induced perioperative anaphylactic shock. A total of 31 patients were included [13 men (48.1%) and 14 women (51.9%)], most of whom were over 60 years old (n=16, 59.3%); 9 (29.0%) patients had a history of drug allergy; 5 (16.1%) patients had received skin tests, but with negative results; 28 (90.3%) patients received treatment intravenously; 22 (71.0%) patients were treated after anesthesia. For 20 (64.5%) patients the ADR occurred within 10 minutes after anesthesia. The main manifestations were hypotension, dyspnea, rash, and tachycardia. For all patients, symptoms resolved after withdrawal of the drug and active rescue, and there were no deaths. A history of allergy and skin test findings may have limitations in predicting perioperative anaphylactic shock caused by cefuroxime; greater vigilance should be exercised when using cefuroxime in the perioperative period. Close monitoring is recommended for patients undergoing treatment with cefuroxime. Rescue therapy should be administered for allergic shock, and suitable response measures must be taken in a timely manner to ensure the safety of patients.

Safety of Direct Drug Provocation for the Evaluation of Penicillin Allergy in Low-Risk Adults.

BACKGROUND: About 10% of patients have a penicillin allergy label, but less than 5% of them are actually allergic. Unnecessary penicillin avoidance is associated with serious medical consequences. Given the growing number of these labels, it is imperative that our diagnostic strategy for penicillin allergy be as efficient as possible. The validity of traditionally used skin tests (STs) has been questioned, whereas drug provocation testing (DPT), the criterion standard, without previous ST appears very safe in most cases. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of direct DPT without consideration for ST results and the validity of ST in the diagnosis of penicillin allergy. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study without a control group, we recruited patients consulting an allergist for penicillin allergy. Patients underwent ST followed by DPT regardless of ST results. Patients with anaphylaxis to penicillin within the past 5 years or a severe delayed reaction were excluded, as were those with significant cardiorespiratory comorbidity. RESULTS: None of the 1002 recruited patients had a serious reaction to DPT. Ten (1.0%) had a mild immediate reaction, of whom only 1 (0.1%) was considered likely IgE-mediated. The positive and negative predictive values of ST for an immediate reaction were 3.6% and 99.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In a low-risk adult population reporting penicillin allergy, ST has very poor positive predictive value. Direct DPT without ST is safe and appears to be an ideal diagnostic strategy to remove penicillin allergy labels that could be implemented in first-line practice.

[Anaphylaxis due to legumes: case report]. / Anafilaxia por leguminosas: reporte de un caso.

BACKGROUND: Legumes belonging to the family Fabaceae of the order Fabales are a widely consumed source of protein. IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions to legumes have been described, the most studied allergens being peanuts and soybeans. In the Mediterranean region and India, lentils, chickpeas and peas have been considered important allergens and legumes have been reported to represent the fifth most common cause of food allergy in children under 5 years of age in Spain. In Latin America, there are few reports of allergy to legumes other than peanuts, and these are especially in the paediatric population. OBJECTIVE: To describe a case of IgE-mediated legume allergy in an adult female patient. CASE REPORT: We describe the case of a 65-year-old female patient who reports a 20-year history of generalized urticaria, accompanied by angioedema and dyspnea occurring immediately after consumption of lentils, beans, chickpeas, soya beans and cold meats, requiring admission to the emergency department for this cause. Tolerates peanuts. She does not report anaphylaxis in any context other than those described. He has presented generalized pruritus with exposure to fumes from cooking beans. Pathological history: Hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism. Allergic: Anaphylaxis due to penicillin at the age of 30. Other history: extensive local reaction to hymenoptera sting. Prick test trophoallergens: soya 3 mm. Prick to prick protein based on commercial soybean 7mm, chickpea 5mm, lentil 6mm and bean 7mm. He was negative for wheat and peanut (Image 1) (Attached in separate file). It has a normal tryptase report. Indication was given for adequate adrenaline and strict avoidance of legumes, except peanuts. CONCLUSIONS: Legume allergy is little known in our environment and mainly affects children. Clinical manifestations include mild reactions and anaphylaxis. A high degree of cross-reactivity among legumes has been reported. Lentils have cross-reactivity with chickpeas and beans. Peanut allergy may also be associated with allergy to lentils, chickpeas, and peas, but is less frequently reported.

ANTECEDENTES: Las leguminosas pertenecientes a la familia Fabaceae del orden Fabales, son una fuente de proteína de amplio consumo. Se han descrito reacciones de hipersensibilidad mediadas por IgE a las leguminosas, siendo los alérgenos más estudiados el maní y la soya. En la región mediterránea y en India, las lentejas, garbanzos y arvejas se han considerado alérgenos importantes, y se ha informado que las leguminosas representan la quinta causa más común de alergia alimentaria en niños menores de cinco años en España. En América Latina, hay pocos reportes de alergia a las leguminosas diferentes al maní, y éstos son, especialmente, en población pediátrica. OBJETIVO: Describir el caso de alergia mediada por IgE a leguminosas, en una paciente adulta. REPORTE DE CASO: Se describe el caso de una paciente de 65 años, quien reporta un cuadro de 20 años con evolución consistente de urticaria generalizada, acompañada de angioedema y disnea, que ocurre, en forma inmediata, tras el consumo lentejas, fríjoles, garbanzos, soya y carnes frías; y requiere de ingresos al servicio de urgencias por esta causa. Tolera maní. No se reporta anafilaxia en otro contexto diferente a los descritos. Ha presentado prurito generalizado con la exposición a vapores de la cocción de fríjoles. Antecedentes patológicos: hipertensión arterial, diabetes mellitus tipo II, hipotiroidismo. Alérgicos: Anafilaxia por Penicilina a los 30 años. Otros antecedentes: Reacción local extensa con picadura de himenópteros. Prick test trofoalérgenos: soya 3 mm. Prick to prick proteína a base de soya comercial 7mm, garbanzo 5mm, lenteja 6mm y fríjol 7mm. Fue negativa para trigo y maní (Imagen 1). (Adjunta en archivo separado). Tiene reporte de triptasa normal. Se dio indicación de porte adecuado de adrenalina y evitación estricta de leguminosas, excepto maní. CONCLUSIONES: La alergia a las leguminosas es poco conocida en nuestro medio, y afecta principalmente a los niños. Sus manifestaciones clínicas incluyen reacciones leves y anafilaxia. Se ha informado, un alto grado de reactividad cruzada entre las leguminosas. Las lentejas tienen reactividad cruzada con garbanzos y fríjoles. La alergia al maní también puede estar asociada con la alergia a lentejas, garbanzos y guisantes, pero se informa con menos frecuencia.

[Clinical case of anaphylaxis due to eye drops]. / Caso clínico de anafilaxia por gotas oftálmicas.

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is a severe systemic allergic reaction that can be life-threatening, timely diagnosis and treatment is required in these patients, one of the most frequent triggers is pharmacological. OBJECTIVE: To report the case of a patient who presented anaphylaxis due to eye drops. CASE REPORT: A 7-year-old male with a history of rhinitis and asthma with good control. It started with itchy eyes, ophthalmic drops were administered, composition: Polyethylene glycol 400, 0.4%, Propylene glycol 3 mg, polyquad 0.001%, presenting at 15 minutes an episode of anaphylaxis initially characterized by pruritus and intense conjunctival erythema, later nausea, vomiting, sweating, weakness, urticaria/facial angioedema and dyspnea were added, this episode was controlled opportunely with Levocetirizine 5 mg sublingual and Betametasona 4 mg intramuscular, progressively improving over the next 2 hours. The patient was evaluated by the Allergist, written recommendations were given to the mother in case this reaction occurred again, the use of the drops was prohibited, and the performance of skin test and a probable conjunctival provocation protocolized with the ophthalmic drops were pending. Accidentally 2 months later the patient was re-exposed with the same eye drops, presenting a similar reaction 15 minutes after the administration of the medication, they went to the emergency room where he received antihistamine and corticosteroid intravenous treatment, after this re-exposure is confirmed to the ophthalmic drops mentioned above as a trigger of anaphylaxis in this patient. CONCLUSIONS: We present a case of conjunctival anaphylaxis after application of eye drops, confirmed by re-exposure to the drug. It is essential to give diagnoses, recommendations with treatments and avoidance of the probable triggering agent of the reaction. The administration of immediate medication when the allergic episode begins in these patients can be vital, even more so when they live far from a health center, as was the case in this patient.

ANTECEDENTES: La anafilaxia es una reacción alérgica sistémica severa que puede llegar a comprometer la vida. Se requiere de un diagnóstico y tratamiento oportuno en estos pacientes, uno de los desencadenantes más frecuente es el farmacológico. OBJETIVO: Reportar el caso de un paciente que presentó anafilaxia a gotas oftálmicas. REPORTE DE CASO: Varón de siete años de edad con antecedentes de rinitis y asma con buen control. Inició con picor ocular, se le administraron gotas oftálmicas, composición: Polietilenglicol 400, 0,4%, Propilenglicol 3 mg, polyquad 0,001%, y a los 15 minutos presentó un episodio de anafilaxia caracterizado, inicialmente, por prurito y eritema conjuntival intenso; posteriormente, presentó náuseas, vómito, sudoración, debilidad, urticaria/angioedema facial y disnea. Este episodio fue controlado en el momento, con tratamiento de Levoceterizina 5 mg s.l. y Betametasona 4 mg i.m., con mejoría progresiva en las siguientes dos horas. El paciente fue evaluado por la especialidad de alergología. A su madre se dieron recomendaciones por escrito, por si se presentaba nuevamente la reacción. Se prohibió la utilización de las gotas, y quedó pendiente la realización de las pruebas cutáneas y una probable provocación conjuntival protocolizada con las gotas oftálmicas. Accidentalmente, dos meses después se reexpuso al paciente con las mismas gotas oftálmicas, y a los 15 minutos de la administración del medicamento, presentó una reacción similar, por lo que acudieron a emergencias donde recibió tratamiento antihistamínico y corticoides vía i.m.; tras esta reexposición, se confirma a las gotas oftálmicas mencionadas anteriomente, como desencadenantes de anafilaxia en el paciente. CONCLUSIONES: Presentamos un caso sobre anafilaxia por vía conjuntival tras aplicación de gotas oftálmicas, confirmado por la reexposición al fármaco. Es esencial dar diagnósticos, recomendaciones con tratamientos y evitar el probable agente desencadenante de la reacción. La administración de medicación inmediata cuando inicia el episodio alérgico en estos pacientes, puede ser vital, más aún cuando viven lejos de un centro de salud, como era el caso referenciado.

Australian and New Zealand Anaesthetic Allergy Group/Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists perioperative anaphylaxis management guideline 2022.

Perioperative anaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening emergency that requires prompt recognition and institution of life-saving therapy. The Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and Australian and New Zealand Anaesthetic Allergy Group have partnered to develop the anaphylaxis management guideline along with crisis management cards that are recommended for use in suspected anaphylaxis in the perioperative setting. This is the third version of these guidelines with the second version having been published in 2016. This article contains the revised Australian and New Zealand Anaesthetic Allergy Group/Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists perioperative anaphylaxis management guideline, with a brief review of the current evidence for the management of anaphylaxis in the perioperative environment.

Asparaginase-specific basophil recognition and activation predict Asparaginase hypersensitivity in mice.

Background: Asparaginase (ASNase) is a crucial part of acute leukemia treatment, but immune responses to the agent can reduce its effectiveness and increase the risk of relapse. Currently, no reliable and validated biomarker predicts ASNase-induced hypersensitivity reactions during therapy. We aimed to identify predictive biomarkers and determine immune cells responsible for anaphylaxis using a murine model of ASNase hypersensitivity. Methods: Our preclinical study uses a murine model to investigate predictive biomarkers of ASNase anaphylaxis, including anti-ASNase antibody responses, immune complex (IC) levels, ASNase-specific binding to leukocytes or basophils, and basophil activation. Results: Our results indicate that mice immunized to ASNase exhibited dynamic IgM, IgG, and IgE antibody responses. The severity of ASNase-induced anaphylaxis was found to be correlated with levels of IgG and IgE, but not IgM. Basophils from immunized mice were able to recognize and activate in response to ASNase ex vivo, and the extent of recognition and activation also correlated with the severity of anaphylaxis observed. Using a multivariable model that included all biomarkers significantly associated with anaphylaxis, independent predictors of ASNase-induced hypersensitivity reactions were found to be ASNase IC levels and ASNase-specific binding to leukocytes or basophils. Consistent with our multivariable analysis, we found that basophil depletion significantly protected mice from ASNase-induced hypersensitivity reactions, supporting that basophils are essential and can be used as a predictive marker of ASNase-induced anaphylaxis. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the need for using tools that can detect both IC- and IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions to mitigate the risk of ASNase-induced hypersensitivity reactions during treatment.

Perioperative anaphylaxis and the principle of primum non nocere.

Perioperative anaphylaxis is a rare and unpredictable event that continues to cause patient harm. More work is needed to decrease the risk to patients through measures to limit sensitisation, optimise management and investigation, and ensure that patients are not inadvertently re-exposed to allergens. Robust epidemiological data such as that provided by the consecutive GERAP surveys over the past 30 yr have been invaluable in defining the problem, identifying emerging allergens, acting as a catalyst for change, and stimulating research.