A comparison of the motor effects and analgesic efficacy following lumbar plexus block combined with sciatic nerve block or epidural in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare motor effects and analgesic efficacy following an ultrasound-guided lateral approach to lumbar plexus blockade at L7 and sciatic nerve blockade (LPSNB) against epidural injection in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial. ANIMALS: A total of 27 healthy adult dogs undergoing unilateral TPLO surgery. METHODS: Dogs were allocated to either LPSNB (bupivacaine 2 mg kg-1, 0.75%) or epidural (morphine PF 0.1 mg kg-1 and bupivacaine 0.5 mg kg-1, 0.75%). Other aspects of clinical management were identical, including anesthetic drug protocol, area of presurgical clipping and bladder care. Time to perform the block, response to surgical stimuli, pain scores, rescue analgesia, time to stand and walk, motor score and time to first urination were recorded. One evaluator, unaware of treatment status, performed all evaluations. Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables between groups, and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: Median (range) times to stand and walk were shorter for LPSNB [60 (40-120) minutes and 90 (60-150) minutes, respectively, p = 0.003] than for epidural [150 (120-240) minutes and 180 (120-360) minutes, respectively, p = 0.006]. Four dogs required rescue intraoperatively (three in epidural group, one in LPSNB group, p = 0.438). Pain scores over the 24 hour evaluation period were similar, and not significantly different, for each group. Time to spontaneous urination [LPSNB, 330 (240-360) minutes; epidural, 300 (120-1440) minutes, p = 1.0] did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An ultrasound-guided lateral paravertebral approach to the lumbar plexus within the psoas compartment at L7, combined with sciatic nerve blockade, allows faster return to normal motor function, with similar pain control and impact on urination when compared with epidural in dogs after TPLO surgery.

The dilutional volume of morphine and xylazine administered via caudal epidural catheter affects cranial spread of analgesia in healthy standing horses.

OBJECTIVE: To test the influence of increasing injectate volumes on the regional effects of xylazine and morphine epidural analgesia, with the hypothesis that increasing volume produces more cranial spread of analgesia as determined by thermal threshold (TT) testing. ANIMALS: 6 university-owned research/teaching horses (2 mares, 4 geldings) deemed healthy on physical examination and basic lameness evaluation, aged 6-19 years and weighing 420-560 kg, were used in this prospective, randomized, blinded, cross-over experimental study. METHODS: After routine placement of a caudal epidural catheter, all animals were subsequently instrumented with a TT testing system at the withers (Location A), the cranial (Location B), and caudal (Location C) abdominal area, over the tuber coxae (Location D), and the hind limb dorsal pasterns (Location E). All horses underwent five testing cycles with 0.2 mg/kg morphine and 0.2 mg/kg xylazine diluted to 20, 35, 50, 75, and 100 mL. TT testing was performed at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours by blinded investigators. RESULTS: With increased epidural volume, significantly greater cranial spread of analgesic effect was noted. All epidural volumes caused significant changes in TT testing at location E but only the largest volume resulted in a significant TT testing change at location A. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Volume influences the regional effects of caudal epidural analgesia in horses but might affect analgesic reliability.

Low-dose epidural anesthesia decreases the use of intraoperative systemic analgesics in goats undergoing lower urinary tract surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether the use of low-dose epidural anesthesia (EA) in goats undergoing lower urinary tract surgery reduces the requirements of perioperative analgesics, contributes to intraoperative hypotension, and improves postoperative comfort during the first 24 hours after surgery. ANIMALS: Retrospective analysis of 38 goats between January 2019 and July 2022. PROCEDURES: Goats were divided into 2 groups (EA or no EA). Demographic characteristics, surgical procedure, time of anesthesia, and anesthetic agents used were compared between treatment groups. Outcome variables potentially related to the use of EA included dose of inhalational anesthetics, incidence of hypotension (mean arterial pressure < 60 mm Hg), intraoperative and postoperative administration of morphine, and time to first meal after surgery. RESULTS: EA (n = 21) consisted of bupivacaine or ropivacaine 0.1% to 0.2% with an opioid. There were no differences between groups except for age (EA group was younger). Less inhalational anesthetic (P = .03) and less intraoperative morphine (P = .008) were used in the EA group. The incidence of hypotension was 52% for EA and 58% for no EA (P = .691). Administration of postoperative morphine was not different between groups (EA, 67%, and no EA, 53%; P = .686). Time to first meal was 7.5 hours (3 to 18 hours) for EA and 11 hours (2 to 24 hours) for no EA (P = .057). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Low-dose EA reduced the use of intraoperative anesthetics/analgesics in goats undergoing lower urinary tract surgery without an increased incidence of hypotension. Postoperative morphine administration was not reduced.

Dexmedetomidine Alone or Combined With Morphine for Epidural Anesthesia in Bitches Undergoing Elective Ovariohysterectomy.

The purpose of this study was to assess perioperative analgesia provided by the combination of epidural dexmedetomidine and morphine in bitches undergoing elective ovariohysterectomy. Twenty-four bitches were included in the study and allocated into 3 groups: GM, morphine 0.1 mg/kg; GD, dexmedetomidine 2 µg/kg; and GDM, dexmedetomidine and morphine at the same doses. All solutions were diluted in saline to a total of 0.36 mL/kg. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (FR) and systolic blood pressure (SAP) were recorded prior to epidural analgesia (TB), immediately following epidural analgesia (TEA), at surgical incision (TSI), at the first ovarian pedicle clamping (TOP1), at the second pedicle clamping (TOP2), at uterine stump clamping (TUC), at the start of abdominal cavity closure (TSC) and at the end of skin closure (TEC). Rescue analgesia with fentanyl was administered at 2 µg/kg IV if nociception corresponding to a 20% increase of any cardiorespiratory variables was noted. Postoperative pain assessment was performed using a modified composite Glasgow pain scale along the first 6 hours following the end of surgery. Numeric data were compared using ANOVA for repeated measures followed by Tukey test and ovarian ligament relaxation was analyzed using chi-square test under 5% significance. No differences were found on FR among times or groups, although HR showed significant differences between GM and GD at TSI, TOP1, TOP2, TSC and TEC and between GM and GDM at TEA and TSI (significantly lower HR values recorded in dexmedetomidine groups). Differences among time points were found on HR between TB and TEA in GD and on PAS between TOP1 and TSC in GM and between TOP1 and TUC in GDM (P < .05). Ovarian ligament relaxation was significantly more present in groups using dexmedetomidine, although the number of rescue analgesia administrations did not differ among groups. Kaplan-Meyer analysis failed to show significant differences on time of rescue analgesia administration among groups (P > .05). In conclusion, the combination of epidural dexmedetomidine and morphine is a more interesting choice for elective ovariohysterectomy in bitches for producing analgesia comparable to that of each drug alone, with noticeable relaxation of ovarian ligaments and lesser cardiovascular consequences.

Comparing the anti-nociceptive, sedative and clinicophysiological effects of epidural detomidine, detomidine-lidocaine and lidocaine in donkeys.

BACKGROUND: Epidural analgesia using the alpha-2 agonist detomidine (DE), alone or in combination with lidocaine (LD), is frequently employed for standing surgical procedures in horses, but its use has not been evaluated in donkeys. METHODS: In a randomised controlled prospective trial, 24 healthy adult donkeys were assigned to four groups (n = 6), each receiving 40 µg/kg of DE, 0.22 mg/kg of LD, combined DE and LD (DELD) or 0.9% sterile normal saline epidurally. After epidural injection of each treatment, the onset, degree and duration of sedation and anatomical extension of anti-nociception were observed. RESULTS: DE and DELD treatments resulted in complete bilateral analgesia with loss of sensation in the tail, perineum, inguinal area, chest and the caudal aspect of the upper pelvic limb, and extended distally to the dorsal metatarsal area. DE and DELD resulted in a significantly (p < 0.05) longer duration of anti-nociception (110 ± 15.4 min and 141.6 ± 14.7 min, respectively) than LD (75.8 ± 4.9 min). The DELD duration of sedation was significantly (p < 0.05) longer than the DE duration (118.3 ± 19.4 min and 108.3 ± 7.5 min, respectively). LIMITATION: The current study's main limitation is using only one dose of DE. CONCLUSION: DE and DELD produced a very effective, safe and acceptable sedative and analgesic effect in the perineal and inguinal regions of donkeys.

Antinociceptive effect of lidocaine, tramadol, and their combination for lumbosacral epidural analgesia in rabbits undergoing experimental knee surgery.

AIM: The current study aimed to evaluate the antinociceptive effect of lidocaine, tramadol, and their combination for lumbosacral epidural analgesia in rabbits undergoing knee surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was performed on 24 male New Zealand white rabbits weighing 2.8 to 3.0 kg and was allocated into three groups. All groups were anaesthetized by intramuscular (IM) injection of 35 mg/kg ketamine and 5 mg/kg xylazine, 0.1 mg/kg butorphanol. Rabbits in Group A received epidural analgesia of 4 mg/kg lidocaine 2%; Group B rabbits received epidural analgesia of 4 mg/kg tramadol 5%, and Group C rabbits received epidural analgesia of a combination of 4 mg/kg lidocaine and 4 mg/kg tramadol. Prior to and during surgery, the following parameters were recorded in a regular pre-set time interval: onset time of analgesia (OT), duration of flaccid paralysis (DFP), duration of analgesia (DA), onset and duration of sensory blockade, onset and duration of motor blockade, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), and rectal temperature (RT). RESULTS: The mean OT demonstrated a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in Group C (46.5 ± 1.4 sec) compared to Group A and B (61.0 ± 2.4 and 54.5 ± 3.5 sec), respectively. DFP was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in Group C (35.5 ± 2.9 min) than in Group A and B (17.6 ± 1.4 and 21.8 ± 3.6), respectively. DA showed a significant increase (P < 0.05) in group C (45.8 ± 3.3 min) compared to groups A and B, respectively (23.3 ± 1.1 and 31.5 ± 2.3). Heart rate, RR, and RT significantly decreased in Group C compared to the other groups. CONCLUSION: According to the current study findings, lumbosacral epidural administration of lidocaine combined with tramadol could be a better choice for potentiating the analgesia than administration of either drug separately and may be safely used in rabbits undergoing knee surgery.

Comparison of cervical epidural morphine with intravenous morphine administration on antinociception in adult horses using thermal threshold testing.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the antinociceptive effects of morphine administered via cervical epidural catheter to intravenously administered morphine using a thermal threshold (TT) testing model in healthy adult horses. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, blinded experimental study. ANIMALS: A total of six university-owned adult horses. METHODS: Horses were instrumented with a cervical (C1-C2) epidural catheter and TT testing device with probes at withers and thoracic limb coronary bands. All horses underwent three TT testing cycles including cervical epidural morphine administration (treatment EpiM; 0.1 mg kg-1), systemic morphine administration (treatment SystM; 0.1 mg kg-1) and no morphine administration (treatment Control). Baseline TT was established prior to treatments, and TT was tested at 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 240, 300, 360, 420, 480, 600 and 720 minutes following treatment. Horses underwent a 5 day washout period between treatments and the order of treatment was randomized. Differences between treatments were analyzed with repeated measures anova. RESULTS: Systemic and epidural morphine administration resulted in significantly higher TT values compared with baseline and control treatment. The duration of effect was significantly longer in treatment EpiM (10-12 hours) than in treatment SystM (1.5-2.0 hours). Horses in treatment EpiM had significantly higher TT values at time points 180-600 minutes (withers) and 300-600 minutes (coronary band) than horses in treatment SystM. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Cervical epidural administration of morphine provided antinociceptive effects as measured by increased TT for 10-12 hours compared with 1.5-2.0 hours for intravenously administered morphine. No complications or adverse effects were noticed following epidural placement of a C1-C2 catheter and administration of morphine. The use of a cervical epidural catheter can be considered for analgesia administration in treatment of thoracic limb and cervical pain in the horse.

Preperitoneal ropivacaine infusion versus epidural ropivacaine-morphine for postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of continuous wound infusion (CWI) with preperitoneal ropivacaine on postoperative analgesia and compare it with the epidural administration of ropivacaine and morphine in bitches undergoing ovariohysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: A parallel, randomized, clinical, prospective and nonblinded study. ANIMALS: A group of 38 Greyhound bitches. METHODS: In the catheter group (CathG), CWI with ropivacaine 1% (1 mg kg-1 + 0.8 mg kg-1 hour-1) was applied to the preperitoneal space over the surgical incision. In the epidural group (EpiG), ropivacaine 0.5% (1.3 mg kg-1) and morphine (0.1 mg kg-1) were epidurally administered. Occipital-coccygeal length was used to calculate the volume for the epidural. Pain was scored using a dynamic interactive visual analogue scale (DIVAS) and Glasgow composite measure pain scale-short form (CMPS-SF) before anaesthesia and at 2, 4, 6, 18, 21 and 24 hours after extubation. Incisional sensitivity using a dynamometer (MWTs-incision) was evaluated simultaneously. Plasma ropivacaine and cortisol concentrations, degree of sedation, motor blockade and response to interdigital clamping were measured or assessed. A two-way mixed analysis of variance and a Mann-Whitney U test were used to analyse data; p < 0.05. RESULTS: No differences were detected in the DIVAS (p = 0.301), CMPS-SF (p = 0.600) scores, MWTs-incision measurements (p = 0.257) and cortisol values (p = 0.878) between the groups. Rescue analgesia was required in two dogs, one in each group, at 2 hours. Sedation, motor blockade and negative response to interdigital clamping were detected in EpiG at 2, 4 and 6 hours. Mean plasma ropivacaine values were higher in CathG (0.475 ± 0.164 ng mL-1) than in EpiG (0.184 ± 0.213 ng mL-1; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Compared with epidural ropivacaine and morphine, CWI with preperitoneal ropivacaine is an effective analgesic technique for postoperative pain management in bitches undergoing ovariohysterectomy without motor blockade.

Retrospective study on the use of lumbosacral epidural analgesia during caesarean section surgery in 182 dogs: Impact on blood pressure, analgesic use and delays.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the use of lumbosacral epidural anaesthesia (LEA) in dogs undergoing caesarean section over 10 years. METHODS: Anaesthetic records were reviewed and divided into two treatment groups: LEA and control. Outcome variables identified a priori as potentially affected by LEA were compared between groups. Results are frequency or median (minimum-maximum). RESULTS: Ninety-five dogs received LEA and 87 did not. LEA consisted of 0.2 (0.1-0.3) ml/kg containing bupivacaine (n = 63), ropivacaine (n = 15), or lidocaine (n = 12) at concentrations ranging between 0.06% and 2%. Morphine, fentanyl, or buprenorphine were used as part of LEA. Groups were similar for demographic variables (all p > 0.06). Intravenous opioids were used more often in control than in LEA (p < 0.0005). Incidence of hypotension (MAP < 60 mm Hg) was LEA 68% and control 56% (p = 0.12). Duration of hypotension was longer in LEA (p = 0.03). Use of crystalloids and vasoactive drugs did not differ (all p > 0.1). Time from induction to operating room was 30 (8-75) min for control and 35 (18-65) min for LEA (p = 0.003). DISCUSSION: LEA during caesarean section in dogs was associated with lower rates of opioid administration and did not exacerbate the incidence of hypotension.

Short-term efficacy of epidural pain management in dogs undergoing cystoscopy.

BACKGROUND: The effects of epidural anesthesia in dogs undergoing cystoscopy are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of epidural analgesia on postcystoscopy pain in dogs. ANIMALS: Twenty-six dogs undergoing routine cystoscopy for lower urinary tract disease. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, blinded observational study. Dogs were assigned either to a treatment group that received epidural anesthesia (preservative free morphine sulfate, 0.09 mg/kg; 1% ropivacaine, 0.2 mg/kg; total volume delivered, 1 mL/4.5 kg of body weight to a maximum of 10 mL; n = 9) or to a nonepidural control group (n = 13). Vital signs were monitored for 24 hours, and sedation and pain scores, behavioral assessments, and presence or absence of complications was evaluated for 5 days postprocedure. RESULTS: All dogs tolerated the epidural without complications. Four dogs were removed from the study because of status unblinding, lack of patient cooperation, or incomplete follow-up. No significant differences were noted in postprocedural pain scores in dogs that received epidural analgesia. Significant differences in postprocedural pain scores were noted in the nonepidural control group. No significant differences were noted in vital signs, behavioral assessments, or the proportion of dogs with a 50% increase in pain scores between the epidural and nonepidural groups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Epidural anesthesia was well-tolerated. Dogs not receiving the epidural had poor postprocedural pain control. A consistent benefit for the epidural vs nonepidural group could not be identified. Additional studies are required to better assess the impact and efficacy of epidural anesthesia for cystoscopic procedures.

Dexmedetomidine and Bupivacaine Association in Caudal Epidural Injection in Mares.

The objective of the study was to compare the effects of caudal epidural bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine (DEX) combination, with bupivacaine or DEX plain for perineal analgesia in mares. Six healthy saddle mares weighing 330-370 kg and aged 10-15 years were used in this study. Each mare was assigned to receive three treatments: 0.04 mg/kg 0.25% bupivacaine (BP), 2 µg/kg DEX (DX), or 0.02 mg/kg bupivacaine and 1 µg/kg DEX (BPDX). The order of treatments was randomized. All drugs were injected into the caudal epidural space (Co1-Co2) through a 16-G Tuohy epidural needle. After the epidural injections, heart rate, respiratory rate, arterial blood pressures (systolic, diastolic, and mean), and rectal temperature were measured at 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes, and after this time, every 60 minutes until the end of the experiments. A subjective score system was used to assess analgesia, behavioral and motor blockade at the same time points. The BPDX treatment produced analgesic action with twice the duration (200 minutes) of the BP treatment (97 minutes), but with an analgesic duration shorter than the DX treatment (240 minutes) in the regions of the tail, perineum, and upper hind limbs in mares. All treatments showed mild motor blockade. No behavioral changes were observed in any of the animals. There was hemodynamic stability without significant changes in respiratory rate for all treatments. Epidural analgesia using DEX alone or the combination of DEX and bupivacaine may be an option for painful obstetric and gynecological procedures in mares.

A prospective randomized, double-blinded clinical study evaluating the efficacy and safety of bupivacaine versus morphine-bupivacaine in caudal epidurals in cats with urethral obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of the caudal epidural technique in cats with urethral obstruction (UO). DESIGN: Prospective, double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled study. ANIMALS: Eighty-eight male cats with UO. INTERVENTIONS: Thirty cats randomized to bupivacaine epidural (BUP), 28 cats to bupivacaine-morphine epidural (BUP/MOR), and 30 cats to sham epidural (SHAM). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Time to perform the epidural and efficacy of the epidural was assessed by evaluation of tail and perineal responses. The amount of propofol for urinary catheterization and time to administration of rescue analgesia (buprenorphine) was recorded. Cats were monitored for epidural complications. The median time to perform the epidural was 2 min (range, 0.2-13 min and range, 0.5-13 min), with an epidural success rate of 70%. The median amount of propofol administered for urinary catheterization was significantly less in the BUP (2.1 mg/kg; range, 0-7.5 mg/kg) and MOR/BUP cats (1.85 mg/kg; range, 0-8.6 mg/kg) as compared to SHAM cats (4 mg/kg; range, 0-12.7 mg/kg) (P = 0.006, P = 0.0008, respectively). The median time to administration of rescue analgesia was also significantly longer in the BUP (10 h; range, 2-32 h) and MOR/BUP cats (10 h; range, 4-45 h) as compared to SHAM cats (4 h; range, 2-36 h) (P = 0.0026, P = 0.0004, respectively). There were no recognized complications related to the epidural. CONCLUSION: Caudal epidural appears to be safe, may reduce the amount of IV anesthesia needed to facilitate urinary catheterization, and can be used to provide long-term analgesia in the hospital.

The effect of neuraxial morphine on postoperative pain in dogs after extrahepatic portosystemic shunt attenuation.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the analgesic effect of epidural morphine after surgical extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (EHPSS) attenuation. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. ANIMALS: A total of 20 dogs with a congenital EHPSS. METHODS: Dogs were randomly allocated to be given either a single epidural dose of 0.2 mg kg-1 preservative-free morphine (group M) or not (group C) before surgery. All dogs were administered 0.3 mg kg-1 methadone intravenously (IV) as preanaesthetic medication. Pain scores were determined every 2 hours for the first 24 hours postoperatively using the short-form Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale (GCMPS-SF). Dogs with a GCMPS-SF pain score >4/20 or >5/24 received 0.1 mg kg-1 methadone IV as rescue analgesia and were reassessed 30 minutes later. If more than three doses of methadone were administered in a 2 hour period, alternative pain relief was provided and a treatment failure recorded. The GCMPS-SF pain scores and number of rescue analgesia injections were analysed over 24 hours. The last observation carried forward method was applied in case of treatment failure. Food consumption and time to first urination were recorded. Data were analysed using a Mann-Whitney U test and presented as median (minimum-maximum range), with significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Group M showed lower GCMPS-SF pain scores [15 (11-41) versus 31 (11-86); p = 0.023] and lower postoperative methadone requirements [0 (0-0.2) versus 0.25 (0-0.5) mg kg-1; p = 0.029] than group C. There were three treatment failures in group C only. Food consumption and time to first urination did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Epidural morphine reduced the requirement for postoperative analgesia in this study population.

Impact of epidural bupivacaine on perioperative opioid requirements, recovery characteristics, and duration of hospitalization in dogs undergoing cystotomy: A retrospective study of 56 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative opioid consumption and duration of hospitalization (DOH) in anesthetized dogs receiving opioid-based analgesia (OBA) vs those receiving bupivacaine epidural-based analgesia (EPID) during cystotomy. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. ANIMALS: Fifty-six client-owned dogs undergoing cystotomy. METHODS: Clinical records of dogs undergoing cystotomy between January 2015 and December 2017 were reviewed. Demographic data, duration of anesthesia and surgery, anesthetic management, perioperative opioid consumption expressed in morphine equivalents (ME), perioperative use of adjuvant analgesics, time to first micturition, time to eat, time to ambulate, and DOH were recorded. Opioid consumption and DOH were compared with a Wilcoxon rank-sum test, followed by linear regression analysis as appropriate. Time to first micturition, time to eat, and time to walk unassisted were modeled with Cox-proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Dogs treated with EPID during surgery required 1.5 mg/kg ME less compared with those treated with OBA (P = .04) during surgery. Three of 19 dogs treated with EPID vs 15 of 37 dogs receiving OBA required intraoperative adjuvant analgesics (P = .06). Dogs treated with EPID regained motor function slower than dogs treated with OBA (P = .01); however, there was no difference in time to urinate, time to eat, or DOH between treatments. CONCLUSION: Perioperative lumbosacral epidural with bupivacaine reduced intraoperative opioid consumption in dogs anesthetized for cystotomy. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The use of epidural bupivacaine in dogs undergoing cystotomy may reduce intraoperative opioid requirements without affecting return of bladder function or DOH.

Influence of caudal epidural analgesia on cortisol concentrations and pain-related behavioral responses in mares during and after ovariectomy via colpotomy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of epidural detomidine and morphine on serum corticosteroid concentrations and pain-related behavioral responses in mares during and after ovariectomy via colpotomy. STUDY DESIGN: Blinded prospective study. ANIMALS: Nine university-owned mares. METHODS: Five of 9 horses received caudal epidural detomidine hydrochloride (0.01 mg/kg) and morphine sulfate (0.1 mg/kg) prior to surgery. All horses received local anesthetic around the ovarian pedicle, 0.02 mg/kg butorphanol IV at the start of the procedure and after first ovary removal, were sedated as required throughout the procedure, and were monitored for leg lifting, grunting, and abdominal tensing. Horses were monitored hourly for pain postoperatively. Heart rate was recorded every 4 hours, and photographs were taken to assess pain according to the horse grimace scale (HGS). Control group horses (n = 4) were treated with butorphanol (0.02 mg/kg IV) every 4 hours for 24 hours postoperatively. All horses received oral phenylbutazone 18 hours postoperatively. Serum cortisol was measured prior to the procedure, after first and second ovary removal, and 8 and 24 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: No differences were detected between horses receiving caudal epidural detomidine and morphine and those that received systemic opioids. A decrease in HGS score occurred after phenylbutazone administration. CONCLUSION: Administration of caudal epidural detomidine and morphine resulted in similar pain-related behavior and corticosteroid concentrations as did administration of systemic butorphanol every 4 hours for 24 hours postoperatively. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Caudal epidural detomidine and morphine may mitigate the requirement for frequent systemic opioid administration after a potentially painful procedure.

Effect of different analgesic techniques on hemodynamic variables recorded with an esophageal Doppler monitor during ovariohysterectomy in dogs.

This study compared the efficacy of intravenous (IV) fentanyl and ketamine with lumbosacral epidural lidocaine in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Dogs with esophageal Doppler monitoring (n = 112) were included in this retrospective study. All dogs were premedicated with dexmedetomidine and methadone, induced with IV propofol or alfaxalone and maintained using isoflurane and IV fentanyl, IV ketamine, or epidural lidocaine. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), expired fraction of isoflurane (ETIso), stroke distance (SD), minute distance (MD), peak velocity (PV) and mean acceleration (MA) were recorded before and after ligation of the ovarian pedicle (OvP). There were no differences for ETIso, HR, and MAP among fentanyl, ketamine, and control groups. Minute Distance, SD, MA and PV significantly decreased after OvP in fentanyl, ketamine, and control groups, but remained stable in the epidural group. Lumbosacral epidural lidocaine prevented hemodynamic depression changes caused by OvP ligation, whereas fentanyl and ketamine failed to do so.

Effet de différentes techniques analgésiques sur les variables hémodynamiques enregistrées avec un moniteur Doppler oesophagien lors de l'ovariohystérectomie chez la chienne. Cette étude a comparé l'efficacité du fentanyl et de la kétamine administrés par voie intraveineuse (IV) à la lidocaïne épidurale lombosacrée chez des chiennes soumis à une ovariohystérectomie. Cent douze chiennes surveillées avec du Doppler oesophagien (n = 112) ont été inclus dans cette étude rétrospective. Tous les chiens ont été prémédiqués avec de la dexmédétomidine et de la méthadone, induits avec du propofol ou de l'alfaxalone IV et maintenus en utilisant de l'isoflurane et du fentanyl IV, de la kétamine IV ou de la lidocaïne épidurale. La fréquence cardiaque (FC), la pression artérielle moyenne (PAM), la fraction expirée d'isoflurane (ETIso), la distance d'éjection (DE), la distance minute (DM), la vitesse maximale (VMax) et l'accélération moyenne (AM) ont été enregistrées avant et après la ligature du pédicule ovairien (POv). Il n'y avait pas des différences pour ETIso, HR et MAP entre les groupes fentanyl, kétamine et témoin. La DM, DE, AM et Vmax avez diminué significativement après POv dans les groupes fentanyl, kétamine et témoins, mais ils restent stables dans le groupe épidural. La lidocaïne épidurale lombosacrée a évité des changements hémodynamiques provoqués par la POv, alors que le fentanyl et la kétamine ne l'ont pas fait.(Traduit par les auteurs).

Efficiency of medetomidine for epidural analgesia: Effects on isoflurane requirement and mean systemic arterial blood pressure in dogs.

Five healthy beagle dogs anesthetized with isoflurane were administered medetomidine (α-2 adrenoceptor agonist) by the epidural route. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and end-tidal concentration of isoflurane (ISO) were measured 1, 2.5, and 4 h after administration. Epidural administration of medetomidine reduced the isoflurane dose required to prevent changes in vital parameters following mechanical stimulation and maintained the MAP at a higher level compared to the control.

Efficacité de la médétomidine pour l'analgésie épidurale : effets sur le besoin d'isoflurane et la tension artérielle systémique moyenne chez les chiens. De la médétomidine a été administrée à cinq chiens Beagle en santé anesthésiés à l'aide de l'isoflurane (agoniste adrénocepteur α-2) par voie épidurale. La tension artérielle moyenne (TAM) et la concentration de fin d'expiration de l'isoflurane (ISO) ont été mesurées 1 heure, 2,5 heures et 4 heures après l'administration. L'administration de médétomidine par épidurale a réduit la dose d'isoflurane requise pour prévenir des changements aux paramètres vitaux après la stimulation mécanique et a maintenu la TAM à un niveau supérieur comparativement au groupe témoin.(Traduit par Isabelle Vallières).