Assessment of platelet functional activity in healthy individuals and patients receiving antiplatelet therapy. Possible inconsistencies between aggregation and flow cytometry tests.

Platelet functional activity was assessed in healthy volunteers (HV, n=92), patients with stable angina pectoris (SA, n=42) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS, n=73), treated with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) + clopidogrel and ASA + ticagrelor, respectively. In all HV and patients we have compared parameters of platelet aggregation (maximum light transmission and velocity, Tmax and Vmax) and parameters, characterizing exposure of platelet activation markers, evaluated by flow cytometry. HV platelets were activated by 10 µM, 1 µM TRAP, and 20 µM, 5 µM, 2.5 µM ADP; patient platelets were activated by 10 µM TRAP and by 20 µM and 5 µM ADP. Strong and significant correlations between the aggregation and flow cytometry parameters (the r correlation coefficient from 0.4 up to >0.6) most frequently were registered in HV platelet during activation by 1 µM TRAP and in SA patients during platelet activation by 20 µM and 5 µM ADP. However, in many other cases these correlations were rather weak (r < 0.3) and sometimes statistically insignificant. In HV the differences in PAC-1 binding parameters between platelets activated by 10 µM TRAP (the strongest agonist) and all ADP concentrations were negligible (≤ 10%), while CD62P binding (at all ADP concentrations) and LTA parameters for (5 µM and 2.5 µM ADP) were significantly lower (by 40-60%). Antiplatelet therapy in patients decreased all parameters as compared to HV, but to varying extents. For 10 µM TRAP the MFI index for PAC-1 binding (40-50% decrease) and for both ADP concentrations the Tmax values (60-85% decrease) appeared to be the most sensitive in comparison with the other parameters that decreased to a lesser extent. The data obtained indicate a possibility of inconsistency between different LTA and flow cytometry parameters in assessing platelet activity and efficacy of antiplatelet drugs.

Exploring acupuncture as a treatment for insomnia in perimenopausal women with stable angina pectoris: A protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Insomnia has emerged as a major public health issue jeopardizing human wellbeing. Furthermore, insomnia and angina arise concomitantly and exert reciprocal effects. Multiple studies suggest that perimenopausal females are more prone to experiencing both angina and insomnia, consequently substantially compromising their quality of life.Credible evidence suggests that acupuncture exerts a beneficial impact in alleviating insomnia. Nevertheless, the exhaustive investigation into the potential of acupuncture for mitigating insomnia co-occurring with stable angina in perimenopausal females remains a realm yet to be traversed in the realm of randomized controlled trials. Hence, the primary intent of this research protocol was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety profile of acupuncture when administered to perimenopausal subjects grappling with concomitant conditions of stable angina and insomnia. METHODS: This study entails a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. A total of 110 patients exhibiting insomnia concomitant with stable angina in the perimenopausal period will be enlisted and randomized to either acupuncture or sham acupuncture. Participants in both arms will undergo 30-minute sessions thrice weekly over a 12-week intervention period, with a 12-week maximum follow-up. The primary outcome measure is the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index(PSQI). Secondary outcomes encompass the Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (SF-36), Dosage of sleeping pills, SAP-associated evaluations, including C-reactive protein (CRP), lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2), cardiac fatty acid-binding protein levels (C-FABP), and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). Additionally, the study includes assessments using the Hamilton Depression Inventory (HAMD) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). Primary and secondary outcomes will be evaluated at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks (upon completion of the intervention), and at an additional 12-week follow-up. Any adverse events will be rigorously classified and characterized with respect to time of onset and abatement, therapeutic interventions implemented, impact on the primary morbidity, and regression. DISCUSSION: The current study is poised to furnish pivotal clinical data on the utility of acupuncture for stable angina with concomitant insomnia in perimenopausal women, with the findings to be propagated through academic conferences and peer-reviewed publications. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Thai Clinical Trials Registry: TCTR20221121001. Registered 19 November 2022.

The clinical value of ß-blockers in patients with stable angina.

Stable angina, one manifestation of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), is characterised by intermittent episodes of insufficient blood supply to the myocardium, provoking symptoms of myocardial ischaemia, particularly chest pain. These attacks usually occur during exercise or stress. Anti-ischaemic drugs are the mainstay of pharmacologic management of CCS with symptoms of angina. ß-blockers reduce heart rate and myocardial contractility, thus reducing myocardial oxygen consumption. These drugs have been shown to ameliorate the frequency of anginal attacks and to improve exercise capacity in these patients. Current management guidelines include ß-blockers as a first-line management option for most patients with CCS and symptoms of myocardial ischaemia, alongside dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCB). The presence of comorbid angina and heart failure is a strong indication for starting with a ß-blocker. ß-blockers are also useful in the management of angina symptoms accompanied by a high heart rate, hypertension (with or without a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system [RAS] blocker or CCB), or microvascular angina (with a RAS blocker and a statin). A ß-blocker is not suitable for a patient with low heart rate (<50 bpm), although use of a ß-blocker may be supported by a pacemaker if the ß-blocker is strongly indicated) and should be used at a low dose only in patients with low blood pressure.

Coronary sinus reducer for the treatment of refractory angina (ORBITA-COSMIC): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The coronary sinus reducer (CSR) is proposed to reduce angina in patients with stable coronary artery disease by improving myocardial perfusion. We aimed to measure its efficacy, compared with placebo, on myocardial ischaemia reduction and symptom improvement. METHODS: ORBITA-COSMIC was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial conducted at six UK hospitals. Patients aged 18 years or older with angina, stable coronary artery disease, ischaemia, and no further options for treatment were eligible. All patients completed a quantitative adenosine-stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance scan, symptom and quality-of-life questionnaires, and a treadmill exercise test before entering a 2-week symptom assessment phase, in which patients reported their angina symptoms using a smartphone application (ORBITA-app). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either CSR or placebo. Both participants and investigators were masked to study assignment. After the CSR implantation or placebo procedure, patients entered a 6-month blinded follow-up phase in which they reported their daily symptoms in the ORBITA-app. At 6 months, all assessments were repeated. The primary outcome was myocardial blood flow in segments designated ischaemic at enrolment during the adenosine-stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance scan. The primary symptom outcome was the number of daily angina episodes. Analysis was done by intention-to-treat and followed Bayesian methodology. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04892537, and completed. FINDINGS: Between May 26, 2021, and June 28, 2023, 61 patients were enrolled, of whom 51 (44 [86%] male; seven [14%] female) were randomly assigned to either the CSR group (n=25) or the placebo group (n=26). Of these, 50 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (24 in the CSR group and 26 in the placebo group). 454 (57%) of 800 imaged cardiac segments were ischaemic at enrolment, with a median stress myocardial blood flow of 1·08 mL/min per g (IQR 0·77-1·41). Myocardial blood flow in ischaemic segments did not improve with CSR compared with placebo (difference 0·06 mL/min per g [95% CrI -0·09 to 0·20]; Pr(Benefit)=78·8%). The number of daily angina episodes was reduced with CSR compared with placebo (OR 1·40 [95% CrI 1·08 to 1·83]; Pr(Benefit)=99·4%). There were two CSR embolisation events in the CSR group, and no acute coronary syndrome events or deaths in either group. INTERPRETATION: ORBITA-COSMIC found no evidence that the CSR improved transmural myocardial perfusion, but the CSR did improve angina compared with placebo. These findings provide evidence for the use of CSR as a further antianginal option for patients with stable coronary artery disease. FUNDING: Medical Research Council, Imperial College Healthcare Charity, National Institute for Health and Care Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, St Mary's Coronary Flow Trust, British Heart Foundation.

Study on the Therapeutic Value of Shexiang Tongxin Dropping Pills in Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris of Coronary Heart Disease Complicated with Cognitive Impairment.

BACKGROUND: There is a pressing need to identify pharmaceuticals that are both safe and efficacious, with lower toxicity, for the treatment of stable angina pectoris in individuals suffering from coronary heart disease. The aim of this paper is to explore the therapeutic value of Shexiang Tongxin Dropping Pills in patients with stable angina pectoris of coronary heart disease complicated with cognitive impairment. METHODS: 200 patients with stable angina pectoris combined with cognitive dysfunction and coronary heart disease admitted to our hospital from January 2022 to June 2023 were retrospectively selected as the study objects. According to the treatment method, the subjects were divided into a control group and a study group, with 100 cases in each group. The control group received conventional oral Western medicine, and the study group underwent treatment with Shexiang Tongxin Dropping Pills in addition to traditional Western medicine. The course of treatment was eight weeks. The enhancement in angina pectoris, cognitive function level, self-care ability, and clinical efficacy of both groups were assessed by comparing the conditions before and after the treatment. RESULTS: After treatment, the frequency and duration of angina pectoris attacks in both groups were significantly lower than before, and the study group was lower than the control group (p < 0.05). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score of both groups was higher than before, and the score of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group (p < 0.05). Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) scores in both groups were significantly lower than before, and the scores of the study group were significantly lower than those of the control group (p < 0.05). Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) syndrome scores in both groups were significantly lower than before, and the scores of the study group were significantly lower than those of the control group (p < 0.05). After treatment, the total effective rate of the control group and the study group was 81.00% and 93.00%, respectively, and the total clinical effective rate of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Shexiang Tongxin Dropping Pills can effectively reduce the incidence of angina pectoris in patients with stable angina pectoris complicated with coronary heart disease and cognitive dysfunction. It can also regulate the patient's neurological function, improve their cognitive level, and significantly improve clinical efficacy.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of Ginkgo biloba dropping pill (GBDP) on stable angina pectoris complicated with depression: A placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Stable angina pectoris (SAP) is a clinical condition characterized by reversible and temporary myocardial ischemia and hypoxia. A majority of SAP patients also experience depressive disorders, which adversely affect their disease prognosis and overall quality of life. However, the clinical utility of existing antidepressants is constrained by their side effects. Ginkgo biloba dropping pill (GBDP), a Chinese patented medication, has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of both coronary heart disease and mental disorders. This prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of GBDP as an adjuvant therapy for SAP complicated by depression. METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either GBDP or a placebo (5 pills, three times a day) in addition to standard therapy for a duration of 12 weeks. The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) was administered every 4 weeks during the treatment, and angina event frequency was assessed weekly. The 36-item Short-Form (SF-36) and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) scores were measured both before and after the treatment. RESULTS: Out of the 72 patients, 68 (n = 34 per group) completed the entire study. At the first visit (4 weeks ± 3 days), the SAQ-Angina Stability score in the GBDP group was significantly higher than that in the placebo group (p < 0.05). While the average weekly frequency of angina episodes in the placebo group notably increased after 12 weeks of treatment (p < 0.05), it displayed an improving trend in the GBDP group (p > 0.05). By the endpoint, each subcategory score of SF-36 in the GBDP group exhibited significant improvement compared to baseline (p < 0.05). The comparison of score improvement between the two groups revealed that the SF-PCS score of the GBDP group was higher than that of the placebo group (p < 0.05). HAMD scores in both groups significantly increased after treatment (p < 0.05). No discernible difference in the incidence of adverse reactions was observed between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients with SAP complicated by depression, GBDP, when combined with standard treatment, rapidly and safely alleviates angina pectoris symptoms. It demonstrates therapeutic potential in enhancing the quality of life and alleviating depressive symptoms.

Efficacy and Safety of Nicorandil in the Treatment of Stable Angina Pectoris.

Background: Stable angina pectoris (SAP) is an ischemic heart disease caused by coronary artery stenosis, which usually occurs during physical activity or emotional excitement. For this type of angina pectoris, reducing the oxygen demand of the heart and increasing the coronary blood flow are the key goals of treatment. Objective: To analyze nicorandil's application effect and adverse reactions in patients with SAP. Methods: Sixty patients with stable angina pectoris admitted to our hospital from December 2020 to May 2022 were randomly selected and included in this study. They were divided into nicorandil group (n=30) and conventional group (n=30). The clinical efficacy, duration of chest pain, number of heart attacks per week, cardiac function indexes, improvement of exercise tolerance, occurrence of adverse reactions, and Seattle Angina Scale (SAQ) score were observed. Results: The effective rate of nicorandil group was 93.33%, which was much higher than that of conventional group (73.33%, P < .05). The results showed that the nicorandil group was significantly better than the conventional group in clinical efficacy, duration of chest pain, number of attacks per week, cardiac function index, improvement of exercise tolerance, occurrence of adverse reactions and SAQ score (P < .05). Conclusions: Nicorandil can improve the clinical symptoms of SAP patients, significantly reduce the duration and frequency of chest pain attacks, and enhance cardiac function indicators. It can be used as an effective drug choice to reduce the frequency and intensity of angina pectoris attacks and is worthy of wide clinical application.

The impact of statins treatments for plaque characteristics in stable angina pectoris patients with very low and high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels: an intracoronary optical coherence tomography study.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels are recommended according to the patient's risk factors based on guidelines. In patients achieving low LDL-C levels, the need for statins is uncertain, and the plaque characteristics of patients not treated with statins are unclear. In addition, the difference in plaque characteristics with and without statins is unclear in similarly high LDL levels. We evaluate the impact of statins on plaque characteristics on optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients with very low LDL-C levels and high LDL-C levels. A total of 173 stable angina pectoris patients with 173 lesions undergoing OCT before percutaneous coronary intervention were evaluated. We divided the LDL-C levels into three groups: < 70 mg/dL (n = 48), 70 mg/dL ≤ LDL-C < 100 mg/dL (n = 71), and ≥ 100 mg/dL (n = 54). Among patients with LDL-C < 70 mg/dL, patients not treated with statins showed a significantly higher C-reactive protein level (0.27 ± 0.22 mg/dL vs. 0.15 ± 0.19 mg/dL, p = 0.049), and higher incidence of thin-cap fibroatheromas (TCFAs; 44% [7/16] vs. 13% [4/32], p = 0.021) than those treated with statins. Among patients with LDL-C level ≥ 100 mg/dL, patients treated with statins showed a significantly higher prevalence of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) (38% [6/16] vs. 5% [2/38], p = 0.004), lower incidence of TCFAs (6% [1/16] vs. 39% [15/38], p = 0.013), healed plaques (13% [2/16] vs. 47% [18/38], p = 0.015), and higher incidence of fibrous plaques (75% [12/16] vs. 42% [16/38], p = 0.027) than patients not treated with statins. While patients achieved a low LDL-C, patients not treated with statins had high plaque vulnerability and high systemic inflammation. While patients had a high LDL-C level with a high prevalence of FH, patients treated with statins had stable plaque characteristics.

Efectividad y seguridad de trimetazidina en pacientes con angina estable / Effectiveness and safety of trimetazidine in patients with stable angina

Introducción: La angina de pecho es el dolor causado por la isquemia miocárdica que por lo general es debida a enfermedad coronaria. Los antianginosos recomendados para el tratamiento inicial son los betabloqueadores y los calcioantagonistas y por lo general se requiere combinarlos con un nitrato para aliviar los episodios de dolor. Cuando los medicamentos de primera línea no son bien tolerados, están contraindicados, o no logran controlar los síntomas es necesario utilizar otros como la trimetazidina (TMZ). Objetivos: Evaluar la evidencia científica sobre los beneficios y riesgos del uso de TMZ para el tratamiento de pacientes con angina estable (AE), como uno de los criterios para informar la toma de decisiones relacionada con la posible inclusión de tecnologías en el Plan Obligatorio de Salud, en el marco de su actualización ordinaria para el año 2015. Métodos: Se buscaron estudios en los que se hubiera probado el uso de TMZ en pacientes con AE. Los comparadores podían ser placebo u otros antianginosos como calcioantagonistas, betabloqueadores, nitratos o ivabradina. No se usaron límites de tiempo y solamente se incluyeron estudios en inglés o español. Resultados: No se encontró evidencia de que el tratamiento con TMZ tenga efecto sobre la mortalidad y los eventos cardiovasculares en pacientes con AE. La capacidad funcional como tal no fue evaluada en ninguno de los estudios encontrados. Un estudio primario de baja calidad metodológica demostró que la TMZ mejora la calidad de vida al comparar con el estado basal. Evidencia de buena calidad demostró que el medicamento disminuye los episodios semanales de angina cuando se compara con placebo, pero evidencia de moderada calidad demostró que no hay diferencias al comparar con otros antianginosos. No se observaron diferencias en la frecuencia de eventos adversos al comparar con placebo. Conclusiones: En pacientes con AE el tratamiento con TMZ no tiene impacto sobre la muerte y los eventos cardiovasculares, no se conoce el efecto sobre la capacidad funcional. El medicamento disminuye el número de ataques semanales de angina cuando se compara con placebo y podría mejorar la calidad de vida pero se necesitan más estudios para demostrarlo.(AU)