Effectiveness and infectious complications of BCMA T-cell engagers in treating multiple myeloma: Real-world evidence from Sweden.

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM), an incurable disease characterized by frequent relapses and a need for multiple treatments, often progresses to a relapse/refractory status resistant to all available drugs and drug classes. Bispecific antibodies, specifically BCMA T-cell engagers, have emerged as effective treatments for MM, demonstrating impressive efficacy. However, these treatments can adversely affect the immune system, increasing vulnerability to infections. METHODS/RESULTS: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of BCMA T-cell engagers in 58 Swedish patients with poor MM prognosis. The patients exhibited a 69% overall response rate, with 69% survival and 60% progression-free survival at 15 months. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the risk of infectious complications, the prognosis of MM patients can be significantly improved with vigilant monitoring and proactive management of infections. This real-world data highlight the potential of BCMA T-cell engagers in treating MM, emphasizing the need for careful patient monitoring to mitigate infection risks.

Biomarkers of Efficacy and Safety of the Academic BCMA-CART ARI0002h for the Treatment of Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

PURPOSE: B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CART) improve results obtained with conventional therapy in the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. However, the high demand and expensive costs associated with CART therapy might prove unsustainable for health systems. Academic CARTs could potentially overcome these issues. Moreover, response biomarkers and resistance mechanisms need to be identified and addressed to improve efficacy and patient selection. Here, we present clinical and ancillary results of the 60 patients treated with the academic BCMA-CART, ARI0002h, in the CARTBCMA-HCB-01 trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected apheresis, final product, peripheral blood and bone marrow samples before and after infusion. We assessed BCMA, T-cell subsets, CART kinetics and antibodies, B-cell aplasia, cytokines, and measurable residual disease by next-generation flow cytometry, and correlated these to clinical outcomes. RESULTS: At cut-off date March 17, 2023, with a median follow-up of 23.1 months (95% CI, 9.2-37.1), overall response rate in the first 3 months was 95% [95% confidence interval (CI), 89.5-100]; cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was observed in 90% of patients (5% grades ≥3) and grade 1 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was reported in 2 patients (3%). Median progression-free survival was 15.8 months (95% CI, 11.5-22.4). Surface BCMA was not predictive of response or survival, but soluble BCMA correlated with worse clinical outcomes and CRS severity. Activation marker HLA-DR in the apheresis was associated with longer progression-free survival and increased exhaustion markers correlated with poorer outcomes. ARI0002h kinetics and loss of B-cell aplasia were not predictive of relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Despite deep and sustained responses achieved with ARI0002h, we identified several biomarkers that correlate with poor outcomes.

Salvage therapies including retreatment with BCMA-directed approaches after BCMA CAR-T relapses for multiple myeloma.

ABSTRACT: For patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with a relapse after B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T), optimal salvage treatment strategies remain unclear. BCMA-directed CAR-T and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are now commercially available, and the outcomes for retreatment with BCMA-directed approaches are not well studied. We performed a retrospective analysis of 68 patients with relapsed disease after BCMA-directed CAR-T to evaluate outcomes and responses to salvage therapies. With a median follow-up of 13.5 months, median overall survival from time of relapse until death was 18 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.2 to not reached [NR]). Fifty-eight patients received subsequent myeloma-directed therapies, with a total of 265 lines of therapy (LOTs). The overall response rate for firstline salvage therapy was 41% (95% CI, 28-55). Among all LOTs, high response rates were observed among those receiving another BCMA-directed CAR-T (89%), BCMA-directed BsAbs (60%), CD38-directed combinations (80% when combined with BsAb; 50% when combined with immunomodulatory drugs and/or proteasome inhibitors), and alkylator-combinations (50% overall; 69% with high-dose alkylators). Thirty-four patients received at least 1 line of salvage BCMA-directed therapy; median progression-free survival was 8.3 months (95% CI, 7.9 to NR), 3.6 months (95% CI, 1.4 to NR), and 1 month (95% CI, 0.9 to NR) with median duration of response (DOR) of 8 months, 4.4 months, and 2.8 months for subsequent BCMA-directed CAR-T, BsAb, and belantamab mafadotin, respectively. Retreatment with BCMA-directed CAR-T and BsAbs can be effective salvage options after BCMA-directed CAR-T relapse; however, DORs appear limited, and further studies with new combinations and alternative targets are warranted.

A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of the efficacy of elranatamab versus teclistamab in patients with triple-class exposed/refractory multiple myeloma.

For patients with triple-class exposed/refractory multiple myeloma (TCE/RMM), where effective treatments options are limited, B-cell maturation antigen and CD3-directed bispecific antibodies offer a promising new approach. Teclistamab gained conditional approval in Europe and accelerated Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval based on the MajesTEC-1 trial (NCT03145181). Elranatamab, approved by the FDA demonstrated its safety and efficacy in the MagnetisMM-3 trial (NCT04649359). Given the absence of head-to-head trials, an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was conducted to assess their relative efficacy. Key baseline characteristics were adjusted to be comparable between the two trials. In the MAIC, elranatamab demonstrated significantly better objective response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) than teclistamab, and numerically better complete response, duration of response, and overall survival (OS). These results suggest that elranatamab is an efficacious option for treating patients with TCE/R MM.

Real-world outcomes in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma patients exposed to three or more prior treatments: an analysis from the ANZ myeloma and related diseases registry.

BACKGROUND: There is no currently available standard of care for triple-class exposed, relapsed refractory myeloma (RRMM) patients in Australia. CARTITUDE-1 (CART-1) was a single-arm, phase 1b/2 study of 97 triple-class exposed RRMM patients, who received BCMA-CAR-T cell therapy with ciltacabtagene autocel. Overall response rate (ORR) was 98%. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) had not been reached at a median follow-up of 28 months. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis on a cohort of CART-1 comparable RRMM patients participating in the Australian and New Zealand Myeloma and Related Diseases Registry (MRDR), to compare outcomes in triple-class exposed MM patients treated with currently available therapies, in a real-world context. The CE-MRDR cohort (n = 28) fulfilled CARTITUDE-1 eligibility (CE) criteria: ≥3 lines of therapy (LOT) including an immunomodulatory agent, proteasome inhibitor and CD38-directed monoclonal antibody (CD38mAb) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score of 0-2 at diagnosis. The modified-CE-MRDR (n = 132) received ≥3 LOT but may not have received a CD38mAb with an ECOG PS score of 3 (0-3). RESULTS: Responses to the first subsequent therapy after eligibility were poor - ORR was 23% and 0% with progressive disease (PD) reported in 61% and 36%, CE-MRDR and m-CE-MRDR respectively. Responses to the second subsequent therapy after eligibility were worse, ORR 0% and 31%, CE-MRDR and m-CE-MRDR respectively, with high rates of PD, particularly in CE-MRDR. Median OS was 5.4 versus 9.5 months, CE-MRDR versus m-CE-MRDR. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis confirms uniformly poor outcomes for Australian RRMM patients. There remains a critical need for greater accessibility to novel treatments, such as CAR-T, outside clinical trials.

Real-world experience of patients with multiple myeloma receiving ide-cel after a prior BCMA-targeted therapy.

Most patients with multiple myeloma experience disease relapse after treatment with a B-cell maturation antigen-targeted therapy (BCMA-TT), and data describing outcomes for patients treated with sequential BCMA-TT are limited. We analyzed clinical outcomes for patients infused with standard-of-care idecabtagene vicleucel, an anti-BCMA chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, at 11 US medical centers. A total of 50 patients with prior BCMA-TT exposure (38 antibody-drug conjugate, 7 bispecific, 5 CAR T) and 153 patients with no prior BCMA-TT were infused with ide-cel, with a median follow-up duration of 4.5 and 6.0 months, respectively. Safety outcomes between cohorts were comparable. The prior BCMA-TT cohort had a lower overall response rate (74% versus 88%; p = 0.021), median duration of response (7.4 versus 9.6 months; p = 0.03), and median progression-free survival (3.2 months versus 9.0 months; p = 0.0002) compared to the cohort without prior BCMA-TT. All five patients who received a prior anti-BCMA CAR T responded to ide-cel, and survival outcomes were best for this subgroup. In conclusion, treatment with ide-cel yielded meaningful clinical responses in real-world patients exposed to a prior BCMA-TT, though response rates and durability were suboptimal compared to those not treated with a prior BCMA-TT.

GPRC5D-Directed CAR Yields 100% Response Rate.

Patients with refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma usually develop resistance to the two approved BCMA-targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. A preliminary study of a new CAR T-cell therapy that zeroes in on the GPRC5D protein on multiple myeloma cells suggests that this approach is safe and effective. All 10 patients treated with the GPRC5D-targeting cells showed responses.

Teclistamab in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Teclistamab is a T-cell-redirecting bispecific antibody that targets both CD3 expressed on the surface of T cells and B-cell maturation antigen expressed on the surface of myeloma cells. In the phase 1 dose-defining portion of the study, teclistamab showed promising efficacy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. METHODS: In this phase 1-2 study, we enrolled patients who had relapsed or refractory myeloma after at least three therapy lines, including triple-class exposure to an immunomodulatory drug, a proteasome inhibitor, and an anti-CD38 antibody. Patients received a weekly subcutaneous injection of teclistamab (at a dose of 1.5 mg per kilogram of body weight) after receiving step-up doses of 0.06 mg and 0.3 mg per kilogram. The primary end point was the overall response (partial response or better). RESULTS: Among 165 patients who received teclistamab, 77.6% had triple-class refractory disease (median, five previous therapy lines). With a median follow-up of 14.1 months, the overall response rate was 63.0%, with 65 patients (39.4%) having a complete response or better. A total of 44 patients (26.7%) were found to have no minimal residual disease (MRD); the MRD-negativity rate among the patients with a complete response or better was 46%. The median duration of response was 18.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.9 to not estimable). The median duration of progression-free survival was 11.3 months (95% CI, 8.8 to 17.1). Common adverse events included cytokine release syndrome (in 72.1% of the patients; grade 3, 0.6%; no grade 4), neutropenia (in 70.9%; grade 3 or 4, 64.2%), anemia (in 52.1%; grade 3 or 4, 37.0%), and thrombocytopenia (in 40.0%; grade 3 or 4, 21.2%). Infections were frequent (in 76.4%; grade 3 or 4, 44.8%). Neurotoxic events occurred in 24 patients (14.5%), including immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome in 5 patients (3.0%; all grade 1 or 2). CONCLUSIONS: Teclistamab resulted in a high rate of deep and durable response in patients with triple-class-exposed relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Cytopenias and infections were common; toxic effects that were consistent with T-cell redirection were mostly grade 1 or 2. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; MajesTEC-1 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03145181 and NCT04557098.).

Anti-BCMA CAR-T Cell Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients With Extramedullary Disease: A Single Center Analysis of Two Clinical Trials.

Background: The prognosis of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients with the extramedullary disease was significantly poor. Extramedullary multiple myeloma (EMM) patients gained limited benefits from traditional drugs. Anti-B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy seems to be a promising approach to treat RRMM patients. However, very few clinical studies are designed for EMM. Our study aimed to compare and assess the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of anti-BCMA CAR-T cell therapy in EMM and non-EMM. Methods: The results from published anti-BCMA CAR-T clinical trials, in which raw data of EMM patients were available, were reviewed and summarized. Two trials conducted in our clinical centers were analyzed and presented with detailed data. Results: According to published anti-BCMA CAR-T clinical trials, the ORR of EMM ranged from 57% to 100%, with the complete remission (CR) rate of 29% to 60%. Between February 22, 2017, and September 26, 2019, a total of 61 subjects (EMM 25; non-EMM 36) received anti-BCMA CAR-T cell infusion. The data-cutoff date was April 1, 2021. There were no statistical differences between EMM and non-EMM groups in adverse events (AEs), including cytokine release syndrome (CRS). The most common AEs of grade ≥ 3 in both groups were hematologic toxicities. There was no significant difference in the objective response rate (ORR) and ≥ complete remission (CR) rate between both groups. However, the ≥ CR rate of the EMM group was lower than the non-EMM group receiving the fully human anti-BCMA CAR-T cell therapy (p = 0.026). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for EMM and the non-EMM group was 121 days and 361 days, respectively (p = 0.001). The median overall survival (OS) for EMM and the non-EMM group was 248 days and 1024 days, respectively (p = 0.005). The Cmax and AUC0-28d for EMM group were lower than non-EMM group (Cmax, p = 0.016; AUC0-28d, p = 0.016). Extramedullary disease was an independent prognostic risk factor for PFS (hazard ratio, 2.576; 95% CI, 1.343 to 4.941; p = 0.004) and OS (hazard ratio, 2.312; 95% CI, 1.165 to 4.592; p = 0.017) in RRMM patients receiving anti-BCMA CAR-T cell therapy. Conclusions: Based on our results, EMM patients could benefit from the two anti-BCMA CAR products, although they had a shorter PFS and OS compared with non-EMM patients. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR-OPC-16009113 and ChiCTR1800018137.

A bispecific CAR-T cell therapy targeting BCMA and CD38 in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: BCMA-specific chimeric antigen receptor-T cells (CAR-Ts) have exhibited remarkable efficacy in refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma (RRMM); however, primary resistance and relapse exist with single-target immunotherapy. Bispecific CARs are proposed to mitigate these limitations. METHODS: We constructed a humanized bispecific BM38 CAR targeting BCMA and CD38 and tested the antimyeloma activity of BM38 CAR-Ts in vitro and in vivo. Twenty-three patients with RRMM received infusions of BM38 CAR-Ts in a phase I trial. RESULTS: BM38 CAR-Ts showed stronger in vitro cytotoxicity to heterogeneous MM cells than did T cells expressing an individual BCMA or CD38 CAR. BM38 CAR-Ts also exhibited potent antimyeloma activity in xenograft mouse models. In the phase I trial, cytokine release syndrome occurred in 20 patients (87%) and was mostly grade 1-2 (65%). Neurotoxicity was not observed. Hematologic toxicities were common, including neutropenia in 96% of the patients, leukopenia in 87%, anemia in 43% and thrombocytopenia in 61%. At a median follow-up of 9.0 months (range 0.5 to 18.5), 20 patients (87%) attained a clinical response and minimal residual disease-negativity (≤ 10-4 nucleated cells), with 12 (52%) achieving a stringent complete response. Extramedullary plasmacytoma was eliminated completely in 56% and partially in 33% and of 9 patients. The median progression-free survival was 17.2 months. Two relapsed patients maintained BCMA and CD38 expression on MM cells. Notably, BM38 CAR-Ts cells were detectable in 77.8% of evaluable patients at 9 months and 62.2% at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Bispecific BM38 CAR-Ts were feasible, safe and significantly effective in patient with RRMM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chictr.org.cn ChiCTR1800018143.

Efficacy of Humanized Anti-BCMA CAR T Cell Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients With and Without Extramedullary Disease.

In recent years, many new treatments for relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM) have improved patient prognosis, but the prognosis of patients with extramedullary MM is still particularly poor. Therefore, more efficacious therapies and novel strategies are urgently needed for these patients. The aim of this study was to observe and compare the efficacy and safety of humanized anti-B cell maturation antigen (anti-BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in R/R MM patients with and without extramedullary disease. Seven R/R MM patients with extramedullary disease and 13 without extramedullary disease received humanized anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy. The overall response rate was not different between patients with and without extramedullary disease. There was no difference in the progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) rates between the two groups at 180 days, but the PFS and OS rates in patients with extramedullary disease were lower at 360 days than those in patients without extramedullary disease. Although some patients with extramedullary disease experienced further disease progression, their M protein level did not increase. We did not see this change trend of M protein in patients without extramedullary disease. However, this was not observed in patients without extramedullary disease. Among patients who responded to CAR T cell therapy, the grades of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxic syndrome (ICANS) were much higher among patients with extramedullary disease. In summary, R/R MM patients with extramedullary disease could benefit from humanized anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy in the short term, although the CRS and ICANS grades were much higher in patients with extramedullary disease. Therefore, anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy allows for a remission time for R/R MM patients with extramedullary disease, which could be maintained by bridging hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, radiotherapy, and other therapies. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx, identifiers ChiCTR1800017051 and ChiCTR2000033925.

Targeting BCMA in Multiple Myeloma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite considerable advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) in the last decade, a significant number of patients still progress on current available therapies. Here, we review treatment modalities used to target BCMA in the treatment of MM, specifically antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), bispecific antibody constructs, and chimeric antibody receptor (CAR) modified T-cell therapies. We will provide an overview of therapies from these classes that have presented or published clinical data, as well as data on mechanisms of resistance to these novel agents. RECENT FINDINGS: Clinical trials exploring different BCMA-targeting modalities to treat multiple myeloma are underway and demonstrate promising results. In relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, anti-BCMA ADCs and bispecific antibody constructs are showing impressive efficacy with manageable side effect profiles. In parallel, adoptive cellular therapy has induced dramatic durable responses in multiply relapsed and refractory myeloma patients. Therapeutic approaches targeting BCMA hold significant potential in the management of multiple myeloma and will soon be incorporated in combination with current standard therapies to improve outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma. In addition, novel approaches are being evaluated to overcome resistance mechanisms to anti-BCMA therapies.

Belantamab Mafodotin (GSK2857916) Drives Immunogenic Cell Death and Immune-mediated Antitumor Responses In Vivo.

B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is an attractive therapeutic target highly expressed on differentiated plasma cells in multiple myeloma and other B-cell malignancies. GSK2857916 (belantamab mafodotin, BLENREP) is a BCMA-targeting antibody-drug conjugate approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. We report that GSK2857916 induces immunogenic cell death in BCMA-expressing cancer cells and promotes dendritic cell activation in vitro and in vivo GSK2857916 treatment enhances intratumor immune cell infiltration and activation, delays tumor growth, and promotes durable complete regressions in immune-competent mice bearing EL4 lymphoma tumors expressing human BCMA (EL4-hBCMA). Responding mice are immune to rechallenge with EL4 parental and EL4-hBCMA cells, suggesting engagement of an adaptive immune response, immunologic memory, and tumor antigen spreading, which are abrogated upon depletion of endogenous CD8+ T cells. Combinations with OX40/OX86, an immune agonist antibody, significantly enhance antitumor activity and increase durable complete responses, providing a strong rationale for clinical evaluation of GSK2857916 combinations with immunotherapies targeting adaptive immune responses, including T-cell-directed checkpoint modulators.

Endogenous soluble receptors sBCMA and sTACI: biomarker, immunoregulator and hurdle for therapy in multiple myeloma.

BAFF and APRIL regulate B cell homeostasis by binding to their three receptors BAFFR, BCMA and TACI. The complexity of this system is further increased by shedding of these three receptors; this reduces signaling due to the display of less surface receptors. Further, soluble forms, sBCMA and sTACI, were detected in body fluids and serve as biomarker in malignancies, autoimmune diseases and immunodeficiencies. sBCMA and sTACI function as decoys blocking BAFF and APRIL. BCMA is a promising therapeutic target in multiple myeloma, but sBCMA may reduce therapeutic activity of CAR T cells, bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates. Insights into the biochemical mechanism of shedding of BCMA can be harnessed to improve BCMA-directed therapy by blocking its shedding with a γ-secretase inhibitor.

Anti-BCMA CAR-T Cell Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients with Impaired Renal Function.

Anti-B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is effective and well-tolerated for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma (RRMM). The purpose of the present study was to analyze efficacy in RRMM patients with renal impairment treated by anti-BCMA CAR-T cell therapy. A total of 59 RRMM patients were selected, and divided into impaired renal function (IRF) group [baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 (n=18)] and normal renal function (NRF) group (baseline eGFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2, n=41). For patients with IRF, eGFR at the 6th month post-CAR-T cells infusion was significantly higher than the baseline (P<0.05). The multivariate analysis showed that light chain type and beta-2 micro-globulin (beta-2M) were associated factors with the decrease of serum creatinine. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in the NRF group and IRF group was 266 days and 181 days respectively. Overall survival (OS) in the NRF group and IRF group was 877 days and 238 days respectively. There was no significant difference in the objective response rate (ORR) between the IRF group and the NRF group. It is suggested that CAR-T cells therapy could improve the renal function during the treatment of RRMM. The renal function could be more significantly improved in RRMM patients with light chain type than with other types.

Long event-free survival after anti-BCMA CAR-T cell treatment for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients: Two case reports.

INTRODUCTION: Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) have been used in the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The response rate and the depth of responses induced by anti-BCMA CAR-T cells are impressive. However, despite this, remissions are not sustained, and the majority of patients eventually relapse. PATIENT CONCERNS: Two patients with multiple myeloma (MM) were selected to enroll in a phase I study involving anti-BCMA CAR-T cells (ChiCTR-OPC-16009113) because they did not have the good effect after traditional treatment. One is a 48-year-old male patient who received a diagnosis of IgG lambda MM in June 2015, he has received 4 cycles of cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (CyBorD) and obtained a complete response (CR). Approximately 11 months later, the disease progressed. Subsequent treatment included regimens incorporating liposomal doxorubicin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (3 cycles); the response was poor, and the disease kept progressing. Another 65-year-old female patient received a diagnosis of IgG lambda MM in September 2016, she has received induction therapy with 1 cycle of bortezomib and dexamethasone (VD) and 4 cycles of lenalidomide and dexamethasone, the response was poor. DIAGNOSIS: Both patients were diagnosed with RRMM according to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria. INTERVENTIONS: Both patients received infusions of anti-BCMA CAR-T cells following an induction chemotherapy regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. OUTCOMES: Both of them achieved a stringent CR at the 30th day with minimal residual disease-negative bone marrow by flow cytometry and serum monoclonal protein was undetectable at 4 and 10 months after cell transfusion. The CR has persisted in the 2 patients for >36 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate the anti-BCMA CAR-T cell treatment is a feasible therapeutic option for patients with RRMM. Fewer early lines of treatment may be beneficial to maintain the efficacy of CAR-T cells. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR-OPC-16009113.

Bilateral anterior cerebral artery occlusion following CD19- and BCMA-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for a myeloma patient.

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T)-cell therapy is a promising treatment for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). In our previous report, CD19- and BCMA-targeted CAR-T co-administration was associated with a high response rate. Although cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity are frequent complications following CAR-T treatment, cerebral infarction is rarely reported as a CAR-T-related complication. We reported a 73-year-old female MM patient who received CD19- and BCMA-targeted CAR-T for refractory disease. Her disease responded to CAR-T therapy, but she developed neurological symptoms following CRS. Cranial CT and MRI demonstrated multiple cerebral infarctions and bilateral anterior cerebral artery (ACA) occlusion. We suggest that cerebral infarction other than CAR-T-related neurotoxicity is the underlying cause of abnormal neuropsychological symptoms, and diagnostic imaging tests should be actively performed to exclude ischemic cerebrovascular events.

A phase I study of anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and plasma cell leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM) patients and primary plasma cell leukemia (PCL) have an unfavorable prognosis and no effective treatment. This study was designed to assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of a novel anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell in R/R MM and PCL. METHODS: Between February 22, 2017, and June 25, 2018, 28 R/R and two R/R primary PCL patients received a median dose of 11.2 × 106 CAR+ cells/kg. The subjects were refractory to a proteasome inhibitor and/or an immunomodulatory agent. Fludarabine and cyclophosphamide were given as lymphodepletion chemotherapy. RESULTS: Results for these 30 consecutive patients who received an anti-BCMA CAR T cell infusion are reported. The patients had received a median of four prior lines of therapy. A total of 44 different types of adverse events were recorded, and hematologic toxic effects were the most common events of any grade during treatment. Hematologic toxic effects were also the most common events of grade 3 or higher. A total of 29 patients (96.7%) had cytokine release syndrome, which was of grade 1 or 2 in 24 patients (80%) and grade 3 in five patients (16.7%). Neurologic toxic effects only occurred in one patient (3.3%) and were of grade 1. The objective response rate was 90%, and the complete response rate was 43.3%. With a median follow-up of 12.6 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 5.2 months and 14.0 months. One of the two primary PCL achieved a complete response with a PFS of 307 days. The other patients achieved a very good partial response with a PFS of 117 days. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-BCMA CAR T cell treatment is safe and highly active in R/R multiple myeloma.

The BCMA-Targeted Fourth-Generation CAR-T Cells Secreting IL-7 and CCL19 for Therapy of Refractory/Recurrent Multiple Myeloma.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) technology has revolutionized cancer treatment, particularly in malignant hematological tumors. Currently, the BCMA-targeted second-generation CAR-T cells have showed impressive efficacy in the treatment of refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma (R/R MM), but up to 50% relapse remains to be addressed urgently. Here we constructed the BCMA-targeted fourth-generation CAR-T cells expressing IL-7 and CCL19 (i.e., BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells), and demonstrated that BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells exhibited superior expansion, differentiation, migration and cytotoxicity. Furthermore, we have been carrying out the first-in-human clinical trial for therapy of R/R MM by use of BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03778346), which preliminarily showed promising safety and efficacy in first two enrolled patients. The two patients achieved a CR and VGPR with Grade 1 cytokine release syndrome only 1 month after one dose of CAR-T cell infusion, and the responses lasted more than 12-month. Taken together, BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells were safe and effective against refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma and thus warranted further clinical study.

Antibody treatment in multiple myeloma.

Antibody therapy, which has become a critical option in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), includes monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, and bispecific antibodies. Anti-CD38 and anti-SLAMF7 monoclonal antibodies were the first to enter the MM portfolio as treatment options for relapsed/ refractory MM. More recently, daratumumab has become important in the treatment of newly diagnosed MM, and a subcutaneous formulation has been approved. BCMA-targeted antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific antibodies, which are the newest antibody therapies to be investigated, provide additional therapeutic options for patients with heavily pretreated MM. This article reviews how antibody therapy has influenced the treatment of MM, describes the unique adverse event profiles of each relevant drug class, and explains how to incorporate antibody therapy into practice.