Pharmacokinetics, mass balance, and metabolism of [14C]vicagrel, a novel irreversible P2Y12 inhibitor in humans.

Vicagrel, a novel irreversible P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, is undergoing phase III trials for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes in China. In this study, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics, mass balance, and metabolism of vicagrel in six healthy male Chinese subjects after a single oral dose of 20 mg [14C]vicagrel (120 µCi). Vicagrel absorption was fast (Tmax = 0.625 h), and the mean t1/2 of vicagrel-related components was ~38.0 h in both plasma and blood. The blood-to-plasma radioactivity AUCinf ratio was 0.55, suggesting preferential distribution of drug-related material in plasma. At 168 h after oral administration, the mean cumulative excreted radioactivity was 96.71% of the dose, including 68.03% in urine and 28.67% in feces. A total of 22 metabolites were identified, and the parent vicagrel was not detected in plasma, urine, or feces. The most important metabolic spot of vicagrel was on the thiophene ring. In plasma pretreated with the derivatization reagent, M9-2, which is a methylated metabolite after thiophene ring opening, was the predominant drug-related component, accounting for 39.43% of the radioactivity in pooled AUC0-8 h plasma. M4, a mono-oxidation metabolite upon ring-opening, was the most abundant metabolite in urine, accounting for 16.25% of the dose, followed by M3-1, accounting for 12.59% of the dose. By comparison, M21 was the major metabolite in feces, accounting for 6.81% of the dose. Overall, renal elimination plays a crucial role in vicagrel disposition, and the thiophene ring is the predominant metabolic site.

Cangrelor, Tirofiban, and Chewed or Standard Prasugrel Regimens in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Primary Results of the FABOLUS-FASTER Trial.

BACKGROUND: Standard administration of newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors, including prasugrel or ticagrelor, provides suboptimal early inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. We aimed to investigate the effects of cangrelor, tirofiban, and prasugrel, administered as chewed or integral loading dose, on IPA in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: The FABOLUS-FASTER trial (Facilitation Through Aggrastat or Cangrelor Bolus and Infusion Over Prasugrel: A Multicenter Randomized Open-Label Trial in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Referred for Primary Percutaneous Intervention) is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, randomized study. A total of 122 P2Y12-naive patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction were randomly allocated (1:1:1) to cangrelor (n=40), tirofiban (n=40) (both administered as bolus and 2-hour infusion followed by 60 mg of prasugrel), or 60-mg loading dose of prasugrel (n=42). The latter group underwent an immediate 1:1 subrandomization to chewed (n=21) or integral (n=21) tablets administration. The trial was powered to test 3 hypotheses (noninferiority of cangrelor compared with tirofiban using a noninferiority margin of 9%, superiority of both tirofiban and cangrelor compared with chewed prasugrel, and superiority of chewed prasugrel as compared with integral prasugrel, each with α=0.016 for the primary end point, which was 30-minute IPA at light transmittance aggregometry in response to 20 µmol/L adenosine diphosphate. RESULTS: At 30 minutes, cangrelor did not satisfy noninferiority compared with tirofiban, which yielded superior IPA over cangrelor (95.0±8.9 versus 34.1±22.5; P<0.001). Cangrelor or tirofiban were both superior to chewed prasugrel (IPA, 10.5±11.0; P<0.001 for both comparisons), which did not provide higher IPA over integral prasugrel (6.3±11.4; P=0.47), despite yielding higher prasugrel active metabolite concentration (ng/mL; 62.3±82.6 versus 17.1±43.5; P=0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Cangrelor provided inferior IPA compared with tirofiban; both treatments yielded greater IPA compared with chewed prasugrel, which led to higher active metabolite concentration but not greater IPA compared with integral prasugrel. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02978040; URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu; EudraCT 2017-001065-24.

Potential and Limitations of the New P2Y12 Inhibitor, Cangrelor, in Preventing Heparin-Induced Platelet Aggregation During Cardiac Surgery: An In Vitro Study.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) can put cardiac surgery patients at a high risk of lethal complications. If anti-PF4/heparin antibodies (anti-PF4/Hep Abs) are present, 2 strategies exist to prevent intraoperative aggregation during bypass surgery: first, using an alternative anticoagulant, and second, using heparin combined with an antiaggregant. The new P2Y12 inhibitor, cangrelor, could be an attractive candidate for the latter strategy; several authors have reported its successful use. The present in vitro study evaluated cangrelor's ability to inhibit heparin-induced platelet aggregation in the presence of anti-PF4/Hep Abs. METHODS: Platelet-poor plasma (PPP) from 30 patients with functional anti-PF4/Hep Abs was mixed with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) from 5 healthy donors.Light transmission aggregometry was used to measure platelet aggregation after adding 0.5 IU·mL of heparin (HIT) to the plasma, and this was compared with samples spiked with normal saline (control) and samples spiked with cangrelor 500 ng·mL and heparin 0.5 IU·mL (treatment). Friedman test with post hoc Dunn-Bonferroni test was used for between-group comparisons. RESULTS: Heparin 0.5 IU·mL triggered aggregation in 22 of 44 PPP-PRP mixtures, with a median aggregation of 86% (interquartile range [IQR], 69-91). The median aggregation of these 22 positive samples' respective control tests was 22% (IQR, 16-30) (P < .001). Median aggregation in the cangrelor-treated samples was 29% (IQR, 19-54) and significantly lower than the HIT samples (P < .001). Cangrelor inhibited heparin-induced aggregation by a median of 91% (IQR, 52-100). Cangrelor only reduced heparin-induced aggregation by >95% in 10 of the 22 positive samples (45%). Cangrelor inhibited heparin-induced aggregation by <50% in 5 of the 22 positive samples (22%) and by <10% in 3 samples (14%). CONCLUSIONS: This in vitro study found that cangrelor was an unreliable inhibitor of heparin-induced aggregation in the presence of anti-PF4/Hep Abs. We conclude that cangrelor should not be used as a standard antiaggregant for cardiac patients affected by HIT during surgery. Unless cangrelor's efficacy in a particular patient has been confirmed in a presurgery aggregation test, other strategies should be chosen.

Impact of low-dose prasugrel on platelet reactivity and cardiac dysfunction in acute coronary syndrome patients requiring primary drug-eluting stent implantation: A randomized comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare how prasugrel and clopidogrel affect platelet aggregation reactivity, cardiac enzyme release, cardiac remodeling, and the formation of in-stent thrombi after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: The advantages of using prasugrel over clopidogrel in cardiac injury following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remain unclear. METHODS: A total of 78 ACS patients were randomly allocated into clopidogrel (300 mg loading/75 mg maintenance) or prasugrel (20 mg loading/3.75 mg maintenance) treatment groups, followed by undergoing primary PCI. Platelet reactivity and cardiac enzymes were measured before and after primary PCI. Moreover, cardiac function was measured by ultrasound echocardiography and coronary angioscopic observation was after primary PCI up to 8 months later. RESULTS: Antiplatelet reactivity in the prasugrel treatment group reached optimal levels (P2Y12 reaction units [PRU] less than 262) immediately after the administration and was maintained even at 8 months, independently of the CYP2C19 genotype. Prasugrel treatment significantly suppressed creatine kinase elevation compared to clopidogrel treatment (median value 404 IU/L to 726 IU/L vs. 189 IU/L to 1,736 IU/L, p = 0.018 for maximum values) and reduced left ventricular mass (217.2-168.8 g in prasugrel, p = 0.045; 196.9-176.4 g in clopidogrel, p = 0.061). There were no significant differences in the incidence of in-stent attached thrombi between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to clopidogrel, prasugrel produced a stable platelet aggregation inhibitory effect in patients with ACS regardless of CYP2C19 genotype, reduced cardiac enzyme release, and prevented cardiac remodeling after ACS.

Population Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Ticagrelor in Children with Sickle Cell Disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Ticagrelor, a reversible P2Y12 platelet inhibitor, is under investigation as a sickle cell disease (SCD) therapy in children. HESTIA1 (NCT02214121) was the first ticagrelor study generating pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD, P2Y12 reactivity units [PRU]), and safety data in 45 pediatric SCD patients. Population PK and PK/PD relationships for ticagrelor were quantified using a PK approach. METHODS: An adult population PK model was refined to describe ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX (active metabolite) plasma concentration and time data over a wide range of single/repeated ticagrelor doses (0.125-2.25 mg/kg). Population PK/PD modeling was used to describe the time course and extent of platelet inhibition. Demographic covariate relationships were investigated. RESULTS: The final population PK model adequately described ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX plasma concentrations over time. An allometric body weight relationship between ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX clearances and volumes of distribution was used. Significant covariates for ticagrelor were sex (relative bioavailability) and cholecystectomy (central volume of distribution). Estimated oral clearances (35 kg patient; median bodyweight) were 22.8 L/h (ticagrelor) and 9.97 L/h (AR-C124910XX). The final population PK/PD model well-described the time course and extent of platelet inhibition. Estimated baseline PRU was 283, maximum PRU effect was fixed at 1, and the ticagrelor concentration for half-maximum PRU effect was 233 nmol/L. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses offer the first quantitative characterization of the dose-exposure-response relationship for ticagrelor in pediatric SCD patients. This model-based approach may be used to inform dose selection and design of subsequent studies that aim to define ticagrelor safety and efficacy in pediatric SCD patients.

Clinical Pharmacology of the Reversible and Potent P2Y12 Receptor Antagonist ACT-246475 After Single Subcutaneous Administration in Healthy Male Subjects.

ACT-246475 is a selective and reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonist inducing inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA). A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-design study was performed to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of escalating single subcutaneous doses of ACT-246475 (1, 2, 4, 8, 16, or 32 mg) in healthy male subjects (N = 8 per dose, 3:1 active:placebo ratio). Pharmacodynamic effects were assessed based on maximum platelet aggregation and P2Y12 reaction units using light transmission aggregometry and VerifyNow® assays, respectively. ACT-246475 was safe and well tolerated up to 32 mg based on adverse event data and absence of clinically relevant changes in hematology, biochemistry, vital signs, and electrocardiogram variables. Median time to reach maximum plasma concentration was 0.5-0.75 hours, and geometric mean terminal half-life ranged from 1.3 to 9.2 hours across the tested dose range. Exposure to ACT-246475 was dose proportional across all dose groups. The maximal %IPA was reached within 30 minutes after subcutaneous administration of ACT-246475. A dose-dependent duration and extent of effect were observed based on area under the effect curve and maximum effect data. Similar results were observed for maximum platelet aggregation and P2Y12 reaction units. The %IPA was ≥85% at doses ≥2 mg. This level of %IPA was extended to at least 12 hours in the 32-mg dose group. The safety and pharmacokinetic/pharmacokinetic profile with quick onset and adequate duration of IPA support further investigation in patients with coronary artery disease.

Hemorrhagic Complications of External Ventriculostomy in the Aspirin and P2Y12 Response Assay Era.

OBJECTIVE: Hemorrhagic complications reported from external ventricular drain (EVD) placement range from 10% to 44%. There remains limited literature investigating the incidence, risk factors, and mechanisms to prevent its occurrence, especially in the setting of antiplatelet agent use. We investigated EVD-related hemorrhagic complications after the implementation of VerifyNow platelet inhibition assays at our institution. METHODS: Medical records from 445 patients requiring EVD placement during a 2-year period during which our institution used the assays were reviewed. In total 345 patients were included, and 208 of them underwent assay testing. Indications for EVD included complications of cerebrovascular disease (n = 215), traumatic brain injury (n = 74), primary hydrocephalus (n = 23), and tumor (n = 33). Hemorrhage was defined as any new area of hyperdensity adjacent to or immediately along the catheter trajectory on computed tomography. RESULTS: There was no significant decrease in catheter-induced hemorrhage (CIH) between patients who underwent the VerifyNow assay and those who did not. Platelet transfusion did not significantly decrease the risk of CIH. CIH occurred in 17.7% of patients, significantly decreased when compared with our previously published incidence of 33% before platelet inhibition assay use (P < 0.05). Patients with cerebrovascular disease complications exhibited a significant decrease in CIH, 20% versus 39%, before assay use (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of hemorrhage is lower in our new cohort when compared with that of our previously published cohort. Despite the overall decreased rate of hemorrhage, there was no significant difference in hemorrhage rates between patients who did or did not undergo the assay. Platelet transfusion did not decrease the incidence of hemorrhage in patients with inhibited platelet function.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship of vicagrel, a novel thienopyridine P2Y12 inhibitor, compared with clopidogrel in healthy Chinese subjects following single oral dosing.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Vicagrel, a novel thienopyridine antiplatelet agent, is an analogue of clopidogrel in development for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes. This study investigated the pharmacokinetic properties of vicagrel after single oral dosing with a direct comparison with clopidogrel in healthy Chinese subjects in the first two phase I clinical studies. The relationship between the exposure to the active metabolite and the platelet reactivity was also assessed for vicagrel. METHODS: Study A was a single-ascending-dose study of vicagrel (5-75 mg) compared with clopidogrel (75 mg) in 67 healthy volunteers. Study B was a randomized, two-period, crossover, loading-dose study of vicagrel 20 mg compared with clopidogrel 300 mg in 12 healthy subjects. Plasma concentrations of three common metabolites of vicagrel and clopidogrel, the active thiol metabolite H4, the inactive thiol metabolite H3, and the S-methylated form of H3 (SM3, the major metabolite of vicagrel), were determined using a validated UHPLC-MS/MS method. The relationship between the AUC0-t of active H4 and the P2Y12 reaction units at 4 h after administration of vicagrel was investigated. Blood concentrations of vicagrel were determined after a single oral administration of vicagrel 25 mg to two healthy Chinese subjects. RESULTS: In the single-ascending-dose study, vicagrel was metabolized rapidly with the median tmax for the three metabolites, namely, H4, H3, and SM3, ranging from 0.25-1.75 h. The pharmacokinetics of the three metabolites for vicagrel were linear across the dose range of 5-75 mg, with the mean Cmax and AUCs for H4 and H3 increasing in an approximately 1:1 dose-proportional manner and for SM3 increasing in a <1:1 dose-proportional manner. The median tmax for active H4 in the vicagrel 5 mg group was slightly shorter than that in the clopidogrel 75 mg group (0.50 versus 0.75 h). The mean AUC0-t for H4 in the vicagrel 5 mg group was similar to that in the clopidogrel 75 mg group (11.7 versus 11.8 ng∙h/mL). The AUC0-t of active H4 was apparently associated with the P2Y12 reaction units at 4 h for vicagrel. In the loading-dose study, for active H4, the median tmax was slightly shorter (0.50 versus 0.75 h) and the mean AUC0-t was 29% higher in the vicagrel 20 mg group than those in the clopidogrel 300 mg group. After a single oral administration of vicagrel 25 mg to 2 subjects, vicagrel was detected in blood but in very low concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Vicagrel was rapidly and extensively metabolized, and the levels of the parent drug in circulation were very low. The pharmacokinetics of the three metabolites of vicagrel were linear and predictable across the dose range of 5-75 mg. The AUC of active H4 was apparently associated with the P2Y12 reaction units for vicagrel. For active H4, vicagrel 5 mg produced similar exposure (AUC) with more rapid appearance compared with clopidogrel 75 mg, and vicagrel 20 mg produced even slightly higher exposure (AUC) with more rapid appearance compared with clopidogrel 300 mg in humans. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTR20150346, CTR20160379.

Quantification of unbound concentration of ticagrelor in plasma as a proof of mechanism biomarker of the reversal agent, MEDI2452.

Ticagrelor, a P2Y12 antagonist, is approved for prevention of thromboembolic events. MEDI2452 is a potential reversal agent for ticagrelor and ticagrelor active metabolite (TAM). The total plasma exposure of ticagrelor and TAM in patients are roughly 0.5-1 and 0.2-0.5 µmol/L, respectively. Both have similar high potency vs. P2Y12 (Ki 2 nmol/L) but are plasma protein-bound to 99.8% and only the 0.2% free fraction is able to inhibit the P2Y12 receptor. Thus, for unbound concentration measurements to be a proof of mechanism biomarker for MEDI2452 a very high sensitivity is required. Using established techniques as equilibrium dialysis and LC-MS/MS, made it possible to evaluate the efficacy of the reversal agent by measuring reduction of unbound concentration of ticagrelor in the presence of MEDI2452. With challenges such as ultra-low concentrations, small sample volumes, recovery issues and adsorption to plastic we managed to develop a highly sensitive assay for determining unbound concentration levels of ticagrelor and TAM in plasma with a quantification limit of 30 pmol/L and 45 pmol/L, respectively. With this method we were able to detect close to a 100-fold MEDI2452 mediated reduction in the unbound concentration of both ticagrelor and TAM. The assay provided proof of mechanism as MEDI2452 concentration- and dose-dependently eliminated unbound concentration of ticagrelor and reversed its antiplatelet activity in preclinical models and will support future development of MEDI2452.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor in subjects on hemodialysis and subjects with normal renal function.

PURPOSE: This single-dose, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, and crossover study assessed pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety of ticagrelor in subjects on hemodialysis versus healthy subjects. METHODS: Hemodialysis subjects were randomized, receiving a single ticagrelor 90-mg dose 1 day post-hemodialysis or just before hemodialysis, with an intervening washout of ≥ 7 days. Healthy subjects (creatinine clearance ≥ 90 mL/min) received a single ticagrelor 90-mg dose. PK, PD (P2Y12 reaction units [PRU], inhibition of platelet aggregation [IPA]), and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-seven subjects (14 hemodialysis, 13 healthy) received ticagrelor. The mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) of ticagrelor were 598.4 ng/mL and 3256.1 ng·h/mL, respectively, in pre-hemodialysis subjects; 560.3 ng/mL and 3015.1 ng·h/mL, respectively, in post-hemodialysis subjects; and 370.8 ng/mL and 2188.8 ng·h/mL, respectively, in healthy subjects. Cmax and AUC0-∞ of AR-C124910XX, the active metabolite, were 152.3 ng/mL and 1144.2 ng·h/mL, respectively, in pre-hemodialysis subjects; 130.8 ng/mL and 1127.8 ng·h/mL, respectively, in post-hemodialysis subjects; and 111.7 ng/mL and 1000.4 ng·h/mL, respectively, in healthy subjects. Mean IPA time curves over 24 h post-dose were almost indistinguishable for all three treatments. The greatest reduction in mean PRU occurred approximately 2 h post-dose for all three treatments. No safety or tolerability issues were identified. CONCLUSION: Hemodialysis resulted in modestly higher exposure to ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX, with no clinically significant effect on PD or tolerability. Accordingly, no dose adjustment is required for hemodialysis patients. Timing of hemodialysis has little impact on ticagrelor PK, or the effect of ticagrelor on IPA.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX in Chinese healthy male subjects.

BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor, the first reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonist, exhibits faster onset and offset of antiplatelet effects and more consistent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel in both healthy subjects and patients with stable coronary artery disease. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to establish a population pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) model of ticagrelor and to provide a theoretical basis for the optimization of ticagrelor treatment in clinic. METHODS: A single oral dose of 180 mg ticagrelor was administered to 14 healthy male subjects in a randomized study. Common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in biotransformation enzymes CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 (CYP3A4*1G and CYP3A5*3) were genotyped by PCR-direct sequencing. Blood samples were collected to measure plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and its active metabolite AR-C124910XX and maximal platelet inhibition. Various models were evaluated to characterize the pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX as well as their PK-PD relationship. Covariates that may potentially affect PK or PD of ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX were included and assessed. Simulation for dosage regimen was performed based on the final PK-PD model. RESULTS: Ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX PK were best described by a two-compartment model with first-order transit absorption model. CYP3A4*1G increased clearance for AR-C124910XX, but had no significant effect on ticagrelor clearance. The relationship between concentration and platelet response of ticagrelor was best described by a turnover model. Simulation results indicated that a lower dosage regimen of 30 mg maintenance dose (MD) could produce an anticipated anti-platelet response in comparison to the routine clinical dosage regimen (180 mg loading dose (LD), 90 mg MD). CONCLUSION: Our study developed a population PK-PD model for ticagrelor and further simulation for dosage regimen was performed based on the final model. Compared to the current recommended dosage regimen (180 mg LD, 90 mg MD), our simulation result of a relatively lower dose (30 mg MD) could also obtain an acceptable anti-platelet response, which may provide a reference for further dosage regimen design in Chinese population.

Ticagrelor pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in patients with NSTEMI after a 180-mg loading dose.

The pharmacokinetics after a 180-mg loading dose (LD) of ticagrelor has not been thoroughly investigated in NSTEMI patients. We aimed to compare the ticagrelor uptake and on-treatment platelet reactivity between non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients and a control group of patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. We performed an observational, prospective, single-center study including 40 NSTEMI patients and 20 SCAD controls. Key exclusion criteria included ongoing opioid treatment. Both groups received a 180-mg ticagrelor LD, and blood samples were taken pre-dose and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours post-LD. Plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and its active metabolite AR-C124910XX were determined by validated methods. Platelet aggregation was tested using ADP-induced multiple electrode aggregometry. The primary endpoint was the time to maximal ticagrelor concentration (Tmax). Clinical trial registration identifier number: NCT02292277. None of the pharmacokinetic variables differed significantly between the groups, including the Tmax of ticagrelor (2.0h [1.0-3.0] versus 2.0h [2.0-3.0], p = 0.393) and the active metabolite AR-C124910XX (3.0 [2.0-4.0] versus 3.0 [2.5-4.0], p = 0.289). High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined as > 46 aggregation units and was at one hour seen in 15% of the NSTEMI patients versus 10% of the controls (p = 1.0). At two hours post the 180-mg ticagrelor LD, 3% of the NSTEMI patients had HPR compared with none of the controls (p = 1.0). In conclusion, the uptake of ticagrelor was not significantly slower in NSTEMI patients not receiving opioids compared with the SCAD controls, leading to adequate onset of platelet inhibition in both groups.

Population pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX in patients with prior myocardial infarction
.

OBJECTIVE: The population pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor and its active metabolite AR-C124910XX were characterized following ticagrelor 60 mg or 90 mg twice daily oral long-term treatment in 4,426 patients with a history of myocardial infarction. METHODS: The ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX plasma concentration-time data were described by one-compartment models with first-order absorption or metabolite formation and elimination. RESULTS: Systemic exposure to ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX were stable over time. Ticagrelor apparent clearance (CL/F) was 17 L/h for the 60-mg and 15.4 L/h for the 90-mg dose. The CL/F of AR-C124910XX was 11.1 L/h for the 60-mg and 9.95 L/h for the 90-mg dose. Both ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX CL/F were independently influenced by body weight, sex, age, smoking, and Japanese ethnicity. Female sex and age > 75 years were the only categorical covariates, having more than 20% effect on AR-C124910XX CL/F. Ticagrelor CL/F was 6% higher and 11% lower, whereas AR-C124910XX CL/F was 26% higher and 34% lower for patients weighing 110 and 50 kg, respectively, compared with an 83 kg patient. CONCLUSIONS: The small differences in exposure to both ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX between demographic subgroups were in accordance with the consistent efficacy and safety outcomes observed across the population. The results were similar to those observed previously in patients with acute coronary syndromes.
.

Comparative pharmacodynamic effects of two clopidogrel formulations under steady-state conditions in healthy Thai volunteers
.

OBJECTIVE: Clopidogrel is a commonly used antiplatelet aggregation agent. Compared with the reference clopidogrel product, most commercially available generic clopidogrel products contain different crystalline forms of clopidogrel. This study was aimed to compare the pharmacodynamics of a commonly used generic clopidogrel product in Thailand with the reference clopidogrel product under steady state conditions. METHODS: A multiple-dose, randomized 2-way crossover study was conducted in 32 healthy male Thai volunteers. The subjects were assigned to receive 75 mg once daily of the test or the reference product for 7 days with a 2-week wash out period. Blood samples were collected on days 1, 5, 6, and 7 prior to drug administration and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after the last dose administered. The antiplatelet aggregation effects of clopidogrel were determined by using two different ex-vivo platelet aggregation tests including the whole blood impedance assay (WBA) and the VerifyNow® P2Y12 assay. Both pharmacodynamic parameters, the maximal antiplatelet effect (Emax) and the areas under the antiplatelet effect-time curve (AUEC0-24h), were calculated. RESULTS: Neither the mean values of Emax (90.70 ± 15.15 vs. 89.50 ± 10.71% inhibition) nor of AUEC0-24h (1,892.84 ± 657.22 vs. 1,853.58 ± 673.95% inhibition × h) under steady-state conditions obtained using the WBA method of these two clopidogrel products were significantly different. The results obtained using the VerifyNow® P2Y12 assay were consistent with those of the WBA assay. CONCLUSION: This study clearly demonstrated that ex-vivo antiplatelet aggregation effect under steady-state conditions of the test product was not significantly different from the reference product.
.

Simultaneous Determination of Ticagrelor and Its Metabolites in Human Plasma and Urine Using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

We have developed and validated a rapid, selective and sensitive method using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (MS) for the quantification of ticagrelor and all of its as-yet-identified metabolites in human plasma and urine. For the analysis of ticagrelor, its metabolites and the internal standard (IS) plasma samples were processed by liquid-liquid extraction using ethyl acetate and urine was processed by protein precipitation. Separations were performed on an Ultimate XB-C18 column (2.1 mm × 150 mm, 3 µm), using aqueous ammonium acetate (0.025 mM)/acetonitrile (35 : 65, v:v) as the mobile phase. Ticagrelor and all 11 metabolites were eluted within 4.5 min. Quantification was performed using electrospray ionization, operating in negative ion mode. The ticagrelor and metabolite M8 (AR-C124910XX) responses were optimized at the m/z 521.2 → 361.2 and m/z 477.2 → 361.1 transitions, respectively. The assay was validated over the linear range of 0.5-2,000 ng/mL for ticagrelor and M8. The intra- and inter-assay precisions were ≤14.6% for ticagrelor and ≤14.7% for M8, respectively. The matrix effects of plasma and urine were in the range of 98.3-110.7% for ticagrelor and 102.1-112.3% for M8. The relative quantification of other metabolites was performed by assessing the ratio of metabolite to IS peaks. The newly developed method was successfully used in a pharmacokinetic study characterizing ticagrelor metabolism in human volunteers.

Self-Powered Microfluidic Device for Rapid Assay of Antiplatelet Drugs.

We report the development of a microfluidic device for the rapid assay in whole blood of interfacial platelet-protein interactions indicative of the efficacy of antiplatelet drugs, for example, aspirin and Plavix, two of the world's most widely used drugs, in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Because platelet adhesion to surface-confined protein matrices is an interfacial phenomenon modulated by fluid shear rates at the blood/protein interface, and because such binding is a better indicator of platelet function than platelet self-aggregation, we designed, fabricated, and characterized the performance of a family of disposable, self-powered microfluidic chips with well-defined flow and interfacial shear rates suitable for small blood volumes (≤200 µL). This work demonstrates that accurate quantification of cell adhesion to protein matrices, an important interfacial biological phenomenon, can be used as a powerful diagnostic tool in those with CVD, the world's leading cause of death. To enable such measurements, we developed a simple technique to fabricate single-use self-powered chips incorporating shear control (SpearChips). These parallel-plate flow devices integrate on-chip vacuum-driven blood flow, using a predegassed elastomer component to obviate active pumping, with microcontact-printed arrays of 6-µm-diameter fluorescently labeled fibrinogen dots on a cyclic olefin polymer base plate as a means to quantitatively count platelet-protein binding events. The use of SpearChips to assess in whole blood samples the effects of GPIIb/IIIa and P2Y12 inhibitors, two important classes of "antiplatelet" drugs, is reported.

Comparison of VerifyNow P2Y12 and thrombelastography for assessing clopidogrel response in stroke patients in China.

Poor response to clopidogrel is often associated with recurrent ischemic events, and reliable platelet function tests are needed to identify clopidogrel low response (CLR). The aim of the study was to compare the consistency of VerifyNow P2Y12 and thrombelastography (TEG) in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with clopidogrel. Patients hospitalized in Changhai Hospital from August 2012 to September 2013 and assigned to treatment with a daily 75-mg dose of clopidogrel. The blood samples were taken on the 5-7th day to assess the capability of VerifyNow P2Y12 and TEG for evaluation of clopidogrel response, and all instrument parameters were used to perform correlation analysis. Patients with CLR were detected by using the methods and criteria published earlier (PRU ≥ 230 assayed by VerifyNow P2Y12 or TEG-Inhib% ≤30 % measured by TEG). Totally 58 patients were enrolled for the study and there were wide varieties in parameters of VerifyNow P2Y12 and TEG. Results showed a total of 17 and 9 patients, respectively, identified as CLR assessed by VerifyNow P2Y12 and TEG, but only three patients were detected to be clopidogrel low responders with both tests. The kappa consistency analysis showed poor consistency between VerifyNow P2Y12 and TEG results in terms of CLR (Kappa = -0.0349, p = 0.7730). Linear regression also demonstrated poor correlation between VerifyNow-PRU/VerifyNow-Inhib% and TEG-Inhib% (p = 0.07901 and p = 0.3788, respectively). Our study demonstrated that there was poor correlation between VerifyNow P2Y12 and TEG results, and VerifyNow P2Y12 showed a larger proportion of CLR than TEG.

Morphine interaction with prasugrel: a double-blind, cross-over trial in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Morphine decreases the concentrations and effects of clopidogrel, which could lead to treatment failure in myocardial infarction. OBJECTIVES: To clarify whether more potent P2Y12-inhibitors may provide an effective alternative, we examined drug-drug interactions between morphine and prasugrel. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers received 60 mg prasugrel with placebo or 5 mg morphine intravenously in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Pharmacokinetics were determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, and prasugrel effects were measured by platelet function tests. RESULTS: Morphine neither diminished total drug exposure (AUC), which was the primary endpoint, nor significantly delayed drug absorption of prasugrel. However, morphine reduced maximal plasma concentrations (C max) of prasugrel active metabolite by 31 % (p = 0.019). Morphine slightly, but not significantly, delayed the onset of maximal inhibition of platelet plug formation under high shear rates (30 vs. 20 min). Whole blood aggregation was not influenced. CONCLUSIONS: Although morphine significantly decreases the maximal plasma concentrations of prasugrel active metabolite, it does not diminish its effects on platelets to a clinically relevant degree in healthy volunteers. However, it should be considered that the observed decrease in C max of prasugrel active metabolite caused by morphine co-administration may gain relevance in STEMI patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01369186, EUDRA-CT#: 2010-023761-22.