[Giant Cell Arteritis and Charles Bonnet Syndrome. The Case of Saint Martin of Leon] / Arteritis de Células Gigantes y Síndrome de Charles Bonnet/Giant Cell Arteritis and Charles Bonnet Syndrome. El caso de Santo Martino de León

Saint Martin of Leon was a monk who lived in the 12th century. The details of his life are known because they were described by his contemporary, Lucas de Tuy, in the Liber de Miraculis Sancti Isidori. Saint Martin of Leon was a venerable old man who suffered from severe headaches, considerable difficulties in raising or maintaining his arms raised, asthenia, and anorexia. In addition, he is represented in his codex Concordia with an unusual hyperpigmentation of the temples suggesting a therapeutic intervention on temporal arteries. These data lead us to think that this could be the first described case of giant cell arteritis with some clinical information. Moreover, he experienced a singular and curious appearance of Saint Isidore of Seville, who made him swallow a booklet, which might correspond to a complex visual hallucination or associated Charles Bonnet syndrome. Historical data on the disease are reviewed and discussed, as well as its evolution and treatment before giving steroids.

Santo Martino de León fue un clérigo leonés del siglo XII. Se conocen algunos detalles de su vida porque fueron descritos por su coetáneo Lucas de Tuy en el Liber de Miraculis Sancti Isidori. Santo Martino era un anciano venerable que padecía fuertes dolores de cabeza, notables dificultades para elevar o mantener elevados los brazos, cansancio y anorexia. Además, aparece representado en su obra Concordia con una inusual hiperpigmentación de las sienes que sugiere alguna intervención terapéutica sobre las arterias temporales. Estos datos nos llevan a pensar que podría ser el primer caso descrito de arteritis de células gigantes con alguna información clínica. Por otra parte, sufrió una singular y curiosa aparición de San Isidoro de Sevilla que le hizo tragar un librillo, que pudiera corresponder a una alucinación visual compleja o síndrome de Charles Bonnet asociado. Se comentan los datos históricos de la enfermedad, así como su evolución y tratamiento antes de los corticoides.

Bayard Horton's clinicopathological description of giant cell (temporal) arteritis.

The author set out to review the thought processes of Bayard Horton as he was clinicopathologically describing the first cases of temporal arteritis. The Mayo Clinic records of the original temporal arteritis patients were examined. Horton obtained the first biopsies of the temporal arteries in temporal arteritis and was the first to describe the histopathology. Horton initially thought his first two patients had actinomycosis of the temporal arteries, but later abandoned this diagnosis. He reported these two patients in 1932 as 'an undescribed form of arteritis of the temporal vessels'. He was the first to describe jaw claudication. He saw a patient with blindness and symptoms suggestive of temporal arteritis before this complication was described in the literature, but initially felt the patient had some other disease. The sedimentation rate was elevated in his first patient. He cared for the first temporal arteritis patient ever treated with cortisone.

Nosology of primary vasculitis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent developments in the nosology of primary systemic vasculitis are placed in the context of an historical overview. The ongoing attempts to develop criteria for classification and diagnosis are discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: Giant cell arteritis has supplanted temporal arteritis as the preferred term for chronic granulomatous arteritis in older adults. A new classification system for childhood vasculitis has been proposed by a European collaborative group. A study of idiopathic polyarteritis nodosa demonstrates greater similarity to microscopic polyangiitis in relapse rate than previously reported. Controversy has arisen over the eponym Wegener's granulomatosis because of alleged involvement of Friedrich Wegener in the Nazi regime during World War II. Diagnostic criteria for Kawasaki disease are problematic because many patients with coronary artery involvement do not fulfill current criteria at the time of presentation. Classification of antineutrophil cytoplasm autoantibody-associated small vessel vasculitis based on antineutrophil cytoplasm autoantibody specificity has been complicated by the finding that different ethnic groups may have very different clinical features relative to antigen specificity; for example, most patients with Wegener's granulomatosis in China have myeloperoxidase-antineutrophil cytoplasm autoantibodies rather than proteinase 3-antineutrophil cytoplasm autoantibodies. SUMMARY: Within the past year, new classification systems for primary vasculitis have been proposed, new classification criteria have been developed, and the appropriateness of a longstanding eponym has been challenged.

The early history of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: first descriptions to 1970.

Giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica were described separately more than 100 years ago. However, the original reports of both conditions were neglected for many years. After the article by Horton et al on giant cell arteritis in the 1930s and studies published by others in the 1940s, giant cell arteritis began to be recognized as a specific disease. In the 1950s and 1960s, many of the numerous presentations and complications of giant cell arteritis were recorded. In a somewhat similar fashion, physicians became cognizant of polymyalgia rheumatica only after several independent descriptions in the 1940s and 1950s. The rapid response of both syndromes to glucocorticoid therapy was discovered shortly after cortisone's effect on rheumatoid arthritis was described. The origin of the proximal aching and stiffness in polymyalgia rheumatica was more difficult to understand. The relatively minor findings in the joints on physical examination seemed insufficient to account for the severe discomfort. As the link between polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis became apparent, some thought the aching in polymyalgia rheumatica was related to vasculitis. The debate about whether proximal synovitis or vasculitis was the cause of the symptoms continued after 1970. Although the reason these 2 conditions were associated was not considered by 1970, the establishment of the syndromes as clinically linked entities provided the groundwork for further progress in the next decades.

The history of polymyalgia rheumatica/giant cell arteritis.

Only two years separate the initial descriptions of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) by Bruce in 1888 and giant cell arteritis (GCA) by Hutchinson in 1890. However, the existence of an association between these two conditions was definitely accepted only in 1964. Even if PMR is generally accepted as a different disease from GCA, some authors deem PMR to be a manifestation of a generalised arteritis and use the term GCA to define PMR/GCA as a whole. The time has come to clarify this issue.