RESUMO
The occupational history is often neglected in the routine evaluation of new patients with asthma, chronic rhinitis, or dermatologic complaints. Such omissions are inadvertent because work-related conditions are often not prioritized. There also may be lack of awareness of the scope of respiratory or cutaneous allergens capable of inducing occupational asthma (OA) or work-related contact dermatitis. Evidence exists suggesting that the occupational history is often neglected among primary care physicians and specialists. Failure to diagnose OA in a timely fashion by identifying occupational sources of exposure, for example, may result in unnecessary morbidity in workers whose exposure is not modified. In this commentary, we propose a brief intake survey to be administered to all patients coming to an allergy practice to quickly screen for possible work-related respiratory symptoms and another for occupational dermatitis. This would require minimal physician time and could be self-administered at the initial encounter and incorporated into the medical record. A positive response to either survey should trigger a more detailed evaluation by the allergy specialist. More detailed approaches for stepwise clinical evaluation of the worker suspected of OA and contact dermatitis are discussed.
Assuntos
Alergistas , Asma Ocupacional , Anamnese , Humanos , Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos/imunologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Assessment of IgE-mediated sensitization to flour allergens is widely used to investigate flour-induced occupational asthma. The diagnostic efficiency of detecting specific IgE antibodies (sIgEs) against wheat and rye flour, however, has not been thoroughly compared with other diagnostic procedures. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sIgE against wheat and rye compared with specific inhalation challenge (SIC) with flour as the reference standard. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included 264 subjects who completed an SIC with flour in eight tertiary centers, of whom 205 subjects showed a positive SIC result. RESULTS: Compared with SIC, sIgE levels of 0.35 kUA/L or greater against wheat and rye provided similar sensitivities (84% to 85%, respectively), specificities (71% to 78%), positive predictive values (91% to 93%), and negative predictive values (56% to 61%). Increasing the threshold sIgE value to 5.10 kUA/L for wheat and to 6.20 kUA/L for rye provided a specificity of 95% or greater and further enhanced the positive predictive value to 98%. Among subjects with a positive SIC, those who failed to demonstrate sIgE against wheat and rye (n = 26) had significantly lower total serum IgE level and blood and sputum eosinophil counts and a lesser increase in postchallenge FeNO compared with subjects with a detectable sIgE. CONCLUSION: High levels of sIgE against wheat and/or rye flour strongly support a diagnosis of flour-induced occupational asthma without the need to perform an SIC. The absence of detectable sIgE against wheat and rye in subjects with a positive SIC seems to be associated with lower levels of TH2 biomarkers.
Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional , Farinha , Imunoglobulina E , Secale , Triticum , Humanos , Secale/imunologia , Secale/efeitos adversos , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Masculino , Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Asma Ocupacional/imunologia , Feminino , Farinha/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Triticum/imunologia , Triticum/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alérgenos/imunologia , Testes de Provocação Brônquica , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Hipersensibilidade a Trigo/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade a Trigo/diagnósticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: This study aims to identify the epidemiological and occupational characteristics of patients with occupational asthma (OA) and to assess their clinical evolution and occupational outcomes. METHODS: We carried out a descriptive epidemiological study over a period of five years (from 2012 to 2016) about the OA cases in the private sector reported in the Tunisian region of Zaghouan. RESULTS: All in all, 165 OA cases were reported during the study period, representing an annual incidence of 733.3 cases per 1,000,000 workers in the private sector. Our study population was composed predominantly (85.5%) of women, whose mean age was 41.5±6.8years. More than three quarters of the affected persons were working in the automobile industry, and most illnesses (77%) were attributable to isocyanates. The mean time to onset of the respiratory symptoms was longer for low molecular weight agents (13.6±3.1years) compared to high molecular weight agents (12.0±3.9years) (P=0.0006). The majority of OA cases (66.7%) lost their jobs. Job loss was significantly more frequent among asthmatic women and workers with OA due to isocyanates. Among the 62 cases of OA for whom risk factors were eliminated, 45 nonetheless remained symptomatic. CONCLUSION: Effective prevention strategies involving the various actors need to be implemented in work environments so as to reduce the frequency and the medico-legal repercussions of a disabling condition.
Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Asma Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Asma Ocupacional/etiologia , Ocupações , Isocianatos , Incidência , Fatores de Risco , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Exposure to disinfectants and cleaning products (DCPs) is now a well-established risk factor for work-related asthma (WRA). However, questions remain on the specific causal agents and pathophysiological mechanisms. Few studies have also reported an association between DCPs and rhinitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This review discusses the recent evidence pertaining to airway diseases attributable to occupational exposure to DCPs. In contrast to other agents, the incidence of WRA due to DCPs has increased over time. The use of DCPs in spray form has clearly been identified as an added risk factor. The mechanisms for WRA associated with DCPs remain poorly studied; however, both allergic and nonallergic responses have been described, with irritant mechanisms thought to play a major role. An early diagnostic workup based on clinical assessment accompanied by evaluation of lung function and immunological and airway inflammatory markers is important to guide optimal care and exposure avoidance to the implicated agent. Future research should focus on the effects of "green" products, pathophysiological mechanisms, and quantitative exposure assessment including the use of barcode-based methods to identify specific agents. There is an urgent need to strengthen preventive measures and interventions to reduce the burden of airway diseases associated with DCPs.
Assuntos
Detergentes , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Detergentes/efeitos adversos , Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Desinfetantes/efeitos adversos , Doenças Profissionais/diagnósticoRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to evaluate recent literature on occupational platinum salt exposure and allergy and asthma in the context of existing evidence. RECENT FINDINGS: A major recent development is that large quantitative platinum salt exposure datasets have become available and are finding applications in epidemiological studies. These exposure data are expected to lead to higher quality epidemiological studies focusing on exposure response relations, modifiers of exposure and sensitization risk. The exposure data might also improve medical referral advice as part of medical surveillance studies and contribute to improved evidence on the effectiveness of exposure referral. SUMMARY: Hopefully, the availability of exposure databases form a stimulus for more exposure response studies and risk assessments leading to science based primary prevention approaches. The availability of more detailed exposure data can guide job transfer decisions in occupational clinical practice.
Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional , Asma , Hipersensibilidade , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Platina , Sais/efeitos adversos , Doenças Profissionais/diagnóstico , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/prevenção & controle , Hipersensibilidade/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Asma Ocupacional/epidemiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Occupational asthma (OA) is a complex condition that can be difficult to diagnose. The purpose of this review is to describe some recent findings regarding the epidemiology of OA, the occupational sensitizing agents, the prognosis of OA, and its primary prevention. RECENT FINDINGS: The risk of developing OA varies according to the geographic localization of the worker, the type of industry and the type of sensitizing agents. New findings have been reported for several known sensitizing agents, such as isocyanates, seafood & cleaning agents, and their related industries, such as hairdressing salons and schools. Moreover, a few new sensitizing agents, such as cannabis, have been identified in the past few years. The prognosis of OA seems worse than that of nonwork-related asthma. It is mainly determined by the duration and the level of exposure. Primary prevention is crucial to reduce the number of new cases of OA. Complete avoidance of exposure to the causal agent remains the optimal treatment of sensitizer-induced OA. SUMMARY: Improving our knowledge regarding OA and its causative agents is key to enable an early recognition of this condition and improve its prognosis. Further research is still needed to improve primary prevention.
Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Asma Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Asma Ocupacional/etiologia , Doenças Profissionais/diagnóstico , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Prognóstico , Isocianatos/efeitos adversosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The many substances used at the workplace that can cause sensitizer-induced occupational asthma are conventionally categorized into high-molecular-weight (HMW) agents and low-molecular-weight (LMW) agents, implying implicitly that these two categories of agents are associated with distinct phenotypic profiles and pathophysiological mechanisms. AREAS COVERED: The authors conducted an evidence-based review of available data in order to identify the similarities and differences between HMW and LMW sensitizing agents. EXPERT OPINION: Compared with LMW agents, HMW agents are associated with a few distinct clinical features (i.e. concomitant work-related rhinitis, incidence of immediate asthmatic reactions and increase in fractional exhaled nitric oxide upon exposure) and risk factors (i.e. atopy and smoking). However, some LMW agents may exhibit 'HMW-like' phenotypic characteristics, indicating that LMW agents are a heterogeneous group of agents and that pooling them into a single group may be misleading. Regardless of the presence of detectable specific IgE antibodies, both HMW and LMW agents are associated with a mixed Th1/Th2 immune response and a predominantly eosinophilic pattern of airway inflammation. Large-scale multicenter studies are needed that use objective diagnostic criteria and assessment of airway inflammatory biomarkers to identify the pathobiological pathways involved in OA caused by the various non-protein agents.
Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional , Peso Molecular , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Asma Ocupacional/imunologia , Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Alérgenos/imunologia , Células Th2/imunologia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe recent findings in endotyping occupational asthma by addressing the role of specific biomarkers. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies on occupational asthma endotypes have focused on immune and inflammatory patterns associated with different occupational exposures to sensitizers or irritants.Sputum neutrophilia has been found in 58.5% patients with occupational asthma caused by high molecular weight (HMW) agents, and work-related dysphonia in patients with occupational asthma was described as associated with sputum neutrophilia too. Neutrophils have been associated also with irritant-induced asthma. The measurement of specific IgE has been confirmed as a valuable diagnostic tool in occupational asthma caused by HMW agents, on the contrary, for most low-molecular-weight agents, the presence of specific IgE has been proven in a small subset of affected workers. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide has been confirmed as a marker of type 2 (T2) inflammation in occupational asthma, mostly when induced by HMW agents (e.g. flour), and it has proved to be more sensitive than spirometry in measuring the efficacy of an intervention.MicroRNA-155 has been shown to contribute to airway inflammation in occupational asthma induced by toluene diisocyanate. SUMMARY: Occupational asthma is heterogeneous, thus monitoring multiple biomarkers is crucial to understand, which inflammatory responses are prevalent.
Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional , MicroRNAs , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores , Inflamação/complicações , Neutrófilos , Imunoglobulina E , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Doenças Profissionais/diagnósticoRESUMO
Asthma in the workplace is an important occupational health issue. It comprises various subtypes: occupational asthma (OA; both allergic asthma and irritant-induced asthma) and work-exacerbated asthma (WEA). Current regulatory paradigms for the management of OA are not fit for purpose. There is therefore an important unmet need, for the purposes of both effective human health protection and appropriate and proportionate regulation, that sub-types of work-related asthma can be accurately identified and classified, and that chemical respiratory allergens that drive allergic asthma can be differentiated according to potency. In this article presently available strategies for the diagnosis and characterisation of asthma in the workplace are described and critically evaluated. These include human health studies, clinical investigations and experimental approaches (structure-activity relationships, assessments of chemical reactivity, experimental animal studies and in vitro methods). Each of these approaches has limitations with respect to providing a clear discrimination between OA and WEA, and between allergen-induced and irritant-induced asthma. Against this background the needs for improved characterisation of work-related asthma, in the context of more appropriate regulation is discussed.
Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Animais , Irritantes/toxicidade , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Asma Ocupacional/induzido quimicamente , Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Alérgenos/toxicidadeRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the recent literature on the long-term outcome of sensitizer-induced and irritant-induced occupational asthma. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies of sensitizer-induced occupational asthma show that after the offending exposure has ceased, most patients report at least partial relief of symptoms. However, in the long term, the diagnosis may negatively impact their careers, incomes, and quality of life. The studies also offer new insights into diisocyanate-induced occupational asthma phenotypes and asthma remission rates. One third of these cases were in remission in long-term after reduction or cessation of exposure. The long-term prognosis of irritant-induced occupational asthma was demonstrated to be poorer than sensitizer-induced occupational asthma. Older age, low fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels and uncontrolled asthma at the time of diagnosis predicted uncontrolled asthma in the long term in patients with irritant and low-molecular-weight sensitizer induced occupational asthma. SUMMARY: Recent studies provide further evidence of the long-term outcome of different occupational asthma phenotypes and the factors that affect them. These findings help us identify patients at risk of poor asthma outcomes, who need close monitoring and support. It should also be borne in mind that occupational asthma diagnosis may have wider-ranging negative impacts on patients' lives.
Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Doenças Profissionais/diagnóstico , Irritantes/efeitos adversos , Qualidade de Vida , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Work-related asthma has become a highly prevalent occupational lung disorder. OBJECTIVE: Our study aims to evaluate occupational exposure as a predictor for asthma exacerbation. METHOD: We performed a retrospective evaluation of 584 consecutive patients diagnosed and treated for asthma between October 2017 and December 2019 in four clinics from Western Romania. We evaluated the enrolled patients for their asthma control level by employing the Asthma Control Test (ACT < 20 represents uncontrolled asthma), the medical record of asthma exacerbations, occupational exposure, and lung function (i.e. spirometry). Then, we used statistical and data mining methods to explore the most important predictors for asthma exacerbations. RESULTS: We identified essential predictors by calculating the odds ratios (OR) for the exacerbation in a logistic regression model. The average age was 45.42 ± 11.74 years (19-85 years), and 422 (72.26%) participants were females. 42.97% of participants had exacerbations in the past year, and 31.16% had a history of occupational exposure. In a multivariate model analysis adjusted for age and gender, the most important predictors for exacerbation were uncontrolled asthma (OR 4.79, p < .001), occupational exposure (OR 4.65, p < .001), and lung function impairment (FEV1 < 80%) (OR 1.15, p = .011). The ensemble machine learning experiments on combined patient features harnessed by our data mining approach reveal that the best predictor is professional exposure, followed by ACT. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning ensemble methods and statistical analysis concordantly indicate that occupational exposure and ACT < 20 are strong predictors for asthma exacerbation.
Assuntos
Asma , Mineração de Dados , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Análise Multivariada , Adulto Jovem , Asma/fisiopatologia , Asma/diagnóstico , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Progressão da Doença , Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Asma Ocupacional/fisiopatologia , Modelos LogísticosRESUMO
Multiple respiratory hazards have been identified in the cannabis cultivation and production industry, in which occupational asthma and work-related exacerbation of preexisting asthma have been reported. An employee working in a Massachusetts cannabis cultivation and processing facility experienced progressively worsening work-associated respiratory symptoms, which culminated in a fatal asthma attack in January 2022. This report represents findings of an Occupational Safety and Health Administration inspection, which included a worksite exposure assessment, coworker and next-of-kin interviews, medical record reviews, and collaboration with the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. Respiratory tract or skin symptoms were reported by four of 10 coworkers with similar job duties. Prevention is best achieved through a multifaceted approach, including controlling asthmagen exposures, such as cannabis dust, providing worker training, and conducting medical monitoring for occupational allergy. Evaluation of workers with new-onset or worsening asthma is essential, along with prompt diagnosis and medical management, which might include cessation of work and workers' compensation when relation to work exposures is identified. It is important to recognize that work in cannabis production is potentially causative.
Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional , Cannabis , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Doenças Profissionais/diagnóstico , Massachusetts/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Occupational asthma triggered by inhaling fish-derived aerosols is estimated to affect 2-8% of exposed individuals. This primarily affects workers in the fish processing industry. Fishmongers, rarely experience this issue, as recent research found no significant difference in asthma rates compared to a control group. We report the case of a fishmonger who presented with a 1-year history of rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma. The patient attributed these symptoms to his occupational exposure within the fish market environment, which worsened in the cold storage warehouse. Symptoms improved during holidays. Diagnosis involved skin-prick tests, sIgE (ImmunoCAP-specific IgE) measurements, and bronchial challenge tests, confirming occupational asthma from fish bioaerosol exposure. Parvalbumins, common fish proteins, share structural similarities, leading to cross-reactivity in fish allergy sufferers. In this case, sensitivity to rGad c1 (cod parvalbumin) was identified as the primary trigger for the patient's asthma, and responsible for sensitizations observed across various tested fish species.
Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Asma Ocupacional/induzido quimicamente , Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Imunoglobulina E , Testes Cutâneos , Parvalbuminas , Testes de Provocação Brônquica , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Doenças Profissionais/diagnóstico , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Alérgenos/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Exposure to certain agents in the workplace can trigger occupational asthma or work-exacerbated asthma, both of which come under the heading of work-related asthma (WRA). Understanding the burden that WRA represents can help in the management of these patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of occupation on asthma in real life and analyze the characteristics of patients with WRA included in an asthma cohort. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter study of a cohort of consecutive patients with asthma. A standardized clinical history was completed. Patients were classified as having WRA or non-WRA. All patients underwent respiratory function tests, FeNO test, and methacholine challenge (methacholine concentration that causes a 20% drop in FEV1) at the beginning of the study. They were classified into two groups, depending on their employment status: employed (group 1) or unemployed (group 2). RESULTS: Of the 480 patients included in the cohort, 82 (17%) received the diagnosis of WRA. Fifty-seven patients (70%) were still working. Mean age (SD) was 46 (10.69) years in group 1 and 57 (9.91) years in group 2 (P < .0001). Significant differences were observed in adherence to treatment (64.9% in group 1 vs 88% in group 2; P = .0354) and in severe asthma exacerbations (35.7% in group 1 vs 0% in group 2; P = .0172). No significant differences were observed in the rest of the variables analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of WRA in specialized asthma units is not negligible. The absence of differences in the severity of asthma, the treatment administered, alterations in lung function, and the number of exacerbations in those working versus not working may support the idea that advice regarding changing jobs should be customized for individual patients.
Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Testes de Provocação Brônquica , Cloreto de Metacolina , Estudos Prospectivos , AdultoRESUMO
Serial measurements of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) at home and at work have been described to provide complementary information for the diagnosis of occupational asthma (OA) when specific inhalation challenge (SIC) is missing or doubtful. We describe two cases in which serial FeNO measurements enabled the detection of probable OA after complex exposures. A 25-year-old industrial painter with exposure to a variety of paints suffered from work-related airway symptoms for five years. Lung function was normal, and she was not atopic. SIC with hexamethylene diisocyanate was negative. A 47-year-old sign maker (screen printing, foils) suffering from work-related dyspnoea for seven years. Moderate airway obstruction, but no atopy was detectable. Due to the complex exposures SIC was not performed. Both patients performed FeNO measurements once daily during a 2-week-holiday and a subsequent 2-week-work period. In both cases elevated baseline FeNO decreased to normal (25 ppb) during holidays and increased after resuming work (case 1: 125 ppb, case 2: 45 ppb).
Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional , Humanos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Teste da Fração de Óxido Nítrico Exalado , Óxido Nítrico , Testes Respiratórios , ExpiraçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The short-term asthma outcome of irritant-induced asthma (IIA) is poorer than that of low-molecular-weight (LMW) sensitizer-induced occupational asthma (OA). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term asthma outcome of IIA and LMW-induced OA and to determine which baseline features are associated with a poor long-term outcome. METHODS: This follow-up questionnaire study assessed 43 patients diagnosed with IIA and 43 patients with LMW-induced OA at the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health in 2004-2018. The baseline results were analyzed to detect features associated with uncontrolled asthma (Asthma Control Test [ACT] score of ≤19, or ≥2 exacerbations or ≥1 serious exacerbation within 1 year) at follow-up. RESULTS: The median interval since OA diagnosis was 6.3 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 4.4-11.3 years). Uncontrolled asthma was more frequent with IIA than with LMW-induced OA (58% vs 40%, adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 3.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20-10.81). Poor symptom control was the main factor for this difference (median [IQR] ACT score of 18 [15-22] vs 21 [18-23], P = .036, respectively). Among all participants, older age (OR: 1.08 per year, 95% CI: 1.02-1.15), a fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) value <20 ppb (OR: 5.08, 95% CI: 1.45-17.80), and uncontrolled asthma at baseline (OR: 3.94, 95% CI: 1.31-11.88) were associated with uncontrolled asthma at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term asthma control of IIA appears to be inferior to that of LMW-induced OA. Older age, a low FeNO value, and uncontrolled asthma at baseline might indicate a worse long-term outcome among those with IIA and LMW-induced OA.