Proof of concept of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling in paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling is an alternative modelling technique that is increasingly used in pharmacokinetics. Due to its nature, it can be complementarily employed to population pharmacokinetics, especially when it comes to small population size. Here, we report the proof of concept of its application to accurately describe the pharmacokinetics of a recombinant L-asparaginase in paediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Data from two randomized, double-blind, phase II/III clinical studies (MC-ASP.4/ALL; MC-ASP.5/ALL) were included to setup and evaluate the final model, respectively. Final population values for basic pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated (clearance: 0.0569 L/h/19.5 kg, volume of distribution: 1.251 L, half-life: 18.5 h, trough concentration: 140.9 IU/L). Pharmacokinetic parameter prediction as well as predictive performance of the model proofed to be comparable to a separately developed population pharmacokinetic model with 13% deviation in predicted median L-asparaginase trough levels. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first whole-body PBPK model of a non-antibody therapeutic protein.

Pharmacokinetics of PEGasparaginase in Infants with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: PEGasparaginase is known to be a critical drug for treating pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), however, there is insufficient evidence to determine the optimal dose for infants who are less than one year of age at diagnosis. This international study was conducted to identify the pharmacokinetics of PEGasparaginase in infants with newly diagnosed ALL and gather insight into the clearance and dosing of this population. METHODS: Infants with ALL who received treatment with PEGasparaginase were included in our population pharmacokinetic assessment employing non-linear mixed effects modelling (NONMEM). RESULTS: 68 infants with ALL, with a total of 388 asparaginase activity samples, were included. PEGasparaginase doses ranging from 400 to 3,663 IU/m2 were administered either intravenously or intramuscularly. A one-compartment model with time-dependent clearance, modeled using a transit model, provided the best fit to the data. Body weight was significantly correlated with clearance and volume of distribution. The final model estimated a half-life of 11.7 days just after administration, which decreased to 1.8 days 14 days after administration. Clearance was 19.5% lower during the post-induction treatment phase compared to induction. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetics of PEGasparaginase in infants diagnosed under one year of age with ALL is comparable to that of older children (1-18 years). We recommend a PEGasparaginase dosing at 1,500 IU/m2 for infants without dose adaptations according to age, and implementing therapeutic drug monitoring as standard practice.

Asparaginase therapy in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: expert opinion on use and toxicity management.

The addition of asparaginase to acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) treatment regimens provides significant patient benefits. Asparaginase therapies vary in origin (Escherichia coli- or Erwinia-derived) and preparation (native or pegylated), conferring distinct pharmacokinetic and immunogenic profiles. Clinical hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) are commonly reported in patients and range from localized erythema to systemic anaphylaxis. Due to its favorable pharmacokinetic profile and reduced immunogenicity compared to native E. coli preparations, pegaspargase is the first-line asparaginase therapeutic option. Switching to an Erwinia-derived asparaginase is recommended for patients who experience HSRs or antibody-mediated inactivation to achieve the significant clinical benefit observed in patients who complete asparaginase treatment. Previous global shortages of asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi necessitated conversion mitigation strategies such as premedication protocols, desensitization, and asparaginase activity level monitoring. Here, we discuss the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, current use, and administration of asparaginase therapies for pediatric and adolescent patients with ALL/LBL.

Improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of a novel PEGylated native Erwinia chrysanthemi L-Asparaginase.

INTRODUCTION: Erwinase® (native Erwinia chrysanthemi L-Asparaginase (nErA)) is an approved second-line treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in children and adolescents, who develop hypersensitivity or neutralising antibodies to E.coli derived L-Asparaginases (ASNases). However, nErA has a short in vivo half-life requiring frequent dosing schedules in patients. In this study, nErA was covalently conjugated to PEG molecules with the aim of extending its half-life in vivo. METHODS: Firstly, efficacy of this novel product PEG-nErA was investigated on human ALL cell lines (Jurkat, CCRF-CEM and CCRF-HSB2), in vitro. Secondly, its pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics were determined, in vivo (12 rats in each group). Results. It was found that the specific activity (U/mg of enzyme) and the kinetic constant (KM) of nErA remained unaltered post PEGylation. PEG-nErA was shown to have similar cytotoxicity to nErA (IC50: 0.06-0.17 U/mL) on human ALL cell lines, in vitro. Further, when compared to nErA, PEG-nErA showed a significantly improved half-life in vivo, which meant that L-Asparagine (Asn) levels in plasma remained depleted for up to 25 days with a four-fold lower dose (100 U/kg) compared with 72 h for nErA at 400 U/kg dose. CONCLUSION: Overall, this next generation product PEG-nErA (with improved PK and PD characteristics compared to nErA) would bring a significant advantage to the therapeutic needs of ALL patients and should be further explored in clinical trials.

A Pharmacokinetic Study of Native E.coli Asparaginase for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated with ThaiPOG Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Asparaginase is one of the essential chemotherapies used to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Asparaginase antibody production may cause a subtherapeutic level and result in an inferior outcome. The aim of this study was to prove the efficacy of current native E.coli asparaginase-based protocol. Moreover, does subtherapeutic result appeared in small group of the trial?. METHODS: A prospective study of asparaginase activity among patients who received native E.coli asparaginase 10,000 IU/m2 intramuscularly according to The Thai Pediatric Oncology Group (ThaiPOG) protocol was done. The plasma asparaginase activity was measured by the coupled enzymatic reaction. Pharmacokinetic data including peak activity (Cmax), time to maximum concentration (Tmax), area under the curve (AUC0-48h) being elucidated. RESULTS: Eight patients (five males and three females), median age 9.5 years, were enrolled. The median asparaginase activity of seven cases who were eligible for calculation reached Tmax within 24 hours (range 6-48 hours) with mean±SD of Cmax 3.60±0.34 (range 3.02-4.11) IU/ml. Mean±SD of AUC0-48h is 143.23±36.94 IU.h/mL (range 71.07 - 180.12 IU.h/mL). The post-48-hour activity showed a mean±SD of 3.19±0.24 IU/ml (range 2.77-3.51 IU/ml) which implied an adequacy of activity over 48 hours and proper for the 12-day period. One relapsed ALL patient showed an extremely low AUC of asparaginase activity which coincided with urticaria after asparaginase injection. Subsequently, the asparaginase antibody was demonstrated in this patient. CONCLUSION: Native E. coli asparaginase-based protocol provides a compelling pharmacokinetic effect. Asparaginase activity and/or antibody testing is recommended for all cases especially in a relapsed patient, history of high accumulative dose of asparaginase or suspected allergic reaction. Patients with low asparaginase activity or allergy may benefit from switching to an alternative form of asparaginase to maintain treatment efficacy.

How much asparaginase is needed for optimal outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia? A systematic review.

This review focuses on asparaginase, a key component of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) treatment since the 1970s. This review evaluates how much asparaginase is needed for optimal outcome in childhood ALL. We provide an overview of asparaginase dose intensity, i.e. duration of total cumulative exposure in weeks and level of exposure reflected by dose and/or asparaginase activity level, and the corresponding outcome. We systematically searched papers published between January 1990 and March 2021 in the PubMed and MEDLINE databases and included 20 papers. The level and duration of exposure were based on the pharmacokinetic profile of the drug and the assumption that trough asparaginase activity levels of ≥100 IU/L should be achieved for complete l-asparagine depletion. The statistical meta-analysis of outcomes was not performed because different outcome measures were used. The level of exposure was not associated with the outcome as long as therapeutic asparaginase activity levels of ≥100 IU/L were reached. Conflicting results were found in the randomised controlled trials, but all truncation studies showed that the duration of exposure (expressed as weeks of l-asparagine depletion) does affect the outcome; however, no clear cutoff for optimal exposure duration was determined. Optimal exposure duration will also depend on immunophenotype, (cyto)genetic subgroups, risk group stratification and backbone therapy.

Pharmacodynamics of cerebrospinal fluid asparagine after asparaginase.

PURPOSE: We evaluated effects of asparaginase dosage, schedule, and formulation on CSF asparagine in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). METHODS: We evaluated CSF asparagine (2114 samples) and serum asparaginase (5007 samples) in 482 children with ALL treated on the Total XVI study (NCT00549848). Patients received one or two 3000 IU/m2 IV pegaspargase doses during induction and were then randomized in continuation to receive 2500 IU/m2 or 3500 IU/m2 IV intermittently (four doses) on the low-risk (LR) or continuously (15 doses) on the standard/high risk (SHR) arms. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model was used to estimate the duration of CSF asparagine depletion below 1 uM. RESULTS: During induction, CSF asparagine depletion after two doses of pegaspargase was twice as long as one dose (median 30.7 vs 15.3 days, p < 0.001). During continuation, the higher dose increased the CSF asparagine depletion duration by only 9% on the LR and 1% in the SHR arm, consistent with the nonlinear pharmacokinetics of serum asparaginase. Pegaspargase caused a longer CSF asparagine depletion duration (1.3-5.3-fold) compared to those who were switched to erwinase (p < 0.001). The median (quartile range) serum asparaginase activity needed to maintain CSF asparagine below 1 µM was 0.44 (0.20, 0.99) IU/mL. Although rare, CNS relapse was higher with decreased CSF asparagine depletion (p = 0.0486); there was no association with relapse at any site (p = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: The number of pegaspargase doses has a stronger influence on CSF asparagine depletion than did dosage, pegaspargase depleted CSF asparagine longer than erwinase, and CSF asparagine depletion may prevent CNS relapses.

Population Pharmacokinetics of PEGylated Asparaginase in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Treatment Phase Dependency and Predictivity in Case of Missing Data.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The pharmacokinetics of polyethylene glycol-conjugated asparaginase (PEG-ASNase) are characterized by an increase in elimination over time, a marked increase in ASNase activity levels from induction to reinduction, and high inter- and intraindividual variability. A population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model is required to estimate individual dose intensity, despite gaps in monitoring compliance. METHODS: In the AIEOP-BFM ALL 2009 trial, two PEG-ASNase administrations (2500 U/m2 intravenously) during induction (14-day interval) and one administration during reinduction were administered in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. ASNase activity levels were monitored weekly. A PopPK model was used for covariate modeling and external validation. The predictivity of the model in case of missing data was tested for observations, as well as for the derived parameters of the area under the concentration time curve (AUC0-∞) and time above different thresholds. RESULTS: Compared to the first administration in induction (1374 patients, 6069 samples), the initial clearance and volume of distribution decreased by 11.0% and 15.9%, respectively, during the second administration during induction and by 41.2% and 28.4% during reinduction. Furthermore, the initial clearance linearly increased for children aged > 8 years and was 7.1% lower for females. The model was successfully externally validated (1253 patients, 5523 samples). In case of missing data, > 52% of the predictions for observations and > 82% for derived parameters were within ± 20% of the nominal value. CONCLUSION: A PopPK model that describes the complex pharmacokinetics of PEG-ASNase was successfully externally validated. AUC0-∞ or time above different thresholds, which are parameters describing dose intensity, can be estimated with high predictivity, despite missing data. ( www.clinicaltrials.gov , NCT01117441, first submitted date: May 3, 2010).

A Randomized Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Recombinant Erwinia Asparaginase (JZP-458) in Healthy Adult Volunteers.

L-asparaginase has been an important component of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapy for over 40 years, and is standard therapy during ALL induction and consolidation treatment. L-asparaginases are immunogenic and can induce hypersensitivity reactions; inability to receive asparaginase has been associated with poor patient outcomes. There are L-asparaginases of varied bacterial origins, with the most commonly used being Escherichia coli (E. coli); therefore, to ensure that patients who develop hypersensitivity to E. coli-derived asparaginases receive an adequate therapeutic course, alternative preparations are warranted. JZP-458 is a recombinant Erwinia asparaginase produced using a novel Pseudomonas fluorescens expression platform that yields an enzyme with no immunologic cross-reactivity to E. coli-derived asparaginases. To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of a single dose of JZP-458, a randomized, single-center, open-label, phase I study was conducted with JZP-458 given via i.m. injection or i.v. infusion to healthy adult volunteers. At the highest doses tested for each route of administration (i.e., 25 mg/m2 i.m. and 37.5 mg/m2 i.v.), JZP-458 achieved serum asparaginase activity (SAA) levels ≥ 0.1 IU/mL at 72 hours postdose for 100% of volunteers. Bioavailability for i.m. JZP-458 was estimated at 36.8% based on SAA data. All dose levels were well-tolerated, with no unanticipated adverse events (AEs), no serious AEs, and no grade 3 or higher AEs. Based on PK and safety data, the recommended JZP-458 starting dose for the pivotal phase II/III study in adult and pediatric patients is 25 mg/m2 i.m. and 37.5 mg/m2 i.v. on a Monday/Wednesday/Friday dosing schedule.

The Brief Analysis of Peptide-combined Nanoparticle: Nanomedicine's Unique Value.

Therapeutic peptides (TPs) are biological macromolecules which can act as neurotransmitters, hormones, ion channel ligands and growth factors. Undoubtedly, TPs are crucial in modern medicine. But low bio-stability and some special adverse reactions reduce their places to the application. With the development of nanotechnology, nanoparticles (NPs) in pharmaceutical science gained much attention. They can encapsulate the TPs into their membrane or shell. Therefore, they can protect the TPs against degradation and then increase the bioavailability, which was thought to be the biggest advantage of them. Additionally, targeting was also studied to improve the effect of TPs. However, there were some drawbacks of nano TPs like low loading efficiency and difficulty to manufacture. Nowadays, lots of studies focused on improving effect of TPs by preparing nanoparticles. In this review, we presented a brief analysis of peptide-combined nanoparticles. Their advantages and disadvantages were listed in terms of mechanism. And several examples of applications were summarized.

Effect of chemical modification with carboxymethyl dextran on kinetic and structural properties of L-asparaginase.

l-asparaginase is a chemotherapy agent in the treatment of childhood leukemia. l-asparaginase has several side effects and a short blood half-life in patients. Chemical modification of l-asparaginase can decrease its side effects and improve its pharmacokinetic properties. The aim of this project was twofold: to chemically modify l-asparaginase with carboxymethyl dextran via carbodiimide cross linker, and to evaluate and compare the biochemical and structural properties of the native and modified enzymes. Chemical modification was done at 25 °C, in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, and in the presence of N-hydroxysuccinimide and carbodiimide. Electrophoresis and free amino groups determination confirmed the chemical modification. Biochemical studies showed that the chemical modification could result in higher specific activity and stability of the modified enzyme. Structural studies further confirmed the chemical modification and revealed conformational changes in the modified enzyme. Taken together, the results showed that chemical modification with carboxymethyl dextran brings about improvement of biochemical properties through several changes in the structural attributes of l-asparaginase and might enhance its applicability in the treatment of childhood leukemia.

Quality-by-Design Approach for Biological API Encapsulation into Polymersomes Using "Off-the-Shelf" Materials: a Study on L-Asparaginase.

Polymersomes are versatile nanostructures for protein delivery with hydrophilic core suitable for large biomolecule encapsulation and protective stable corona. Nonetheless, pharmaceutical products based on polymersomes are not available in the market, yet. Here, using commercially available copolymers, we investigated the encapsulation of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) L-asparaginase, an enzyme used to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia, in polymersomes through a quality-by-design (QbD) approach. This allows for streamlining of processes required for improved bioavailability and pharmaceutical activity. Polymersomes were prepared by bottom-up (temperature switch) and top-down (film hydration) methods employing the diblock copolymers poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(lactic acid) (PEG45-PLA69, PEG114-PLA153, and PEG114-PLA180) and the triblock Pluronic® L-121 (poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide)-poly(ethylene oxide), PEG5-PPO68-PEG5). Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP), Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs), Critical Process Parameters (CPPs), and the risk assessment were discussed for the early phase of polymersome development. An Ishikawa diagram was elaborated focusing on analytical methods, raw materials, and processes for polymersome preparation and L-asparaginase encapsulation. PEG-PLA resulted in diluted polymersomes systems. Nonetheless, a much higher yield of Pluronic® L-121 polymersomes of 200 nm were produced by temperature switch, reaching 5% encapsulation efficiency. Based on these results, a risk estimation matrix was created for an initial risk assessment, which can help in the future development of other polymersome systems with biological APIs nanoencapsulated.

Glutaminase Activity of L-Asparaginase Contributes to Durable Preclinical Activity against Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

We and others have reported that the anticancer activity of L-asparaginase (ASNase) against asparagine synthetase (ASNS)-positive cell types requires ASNase glutaminase activity, whereas anticancer activity against ASNS-negative cell types does not. Here, we attempted to disentangle the relationship between asparagine metabolism, glutamine metabolism, and downstream pathways that modulate cell viability by testing the hypothesis that ASNase anticancer activity is based on asparagine depletion rather than glutamine depletion per se. We tested ASNase wild-type (ASNaseWT) and its glutaminase-deficient Q59L mutant (ASNaseQ59L) and found that ASNase glutaminase activity contributed to durable anticancer activity against xenografts of the ASNS-negative Sup-B15 leukemia cell line in NOD/SCID gamma mice, whereas asparaginase activity alone yielded a mere growth delay. Our findings suggest that ASNase glutaminase activity is necessary for durable, single-agent anticancer activity in vivo, even against ASNS-negative cancer types.

Universal premedication and therapeutic drug monitoring for asparaginase-based therapy prevents infusion-associated acute adverse events and drug substitutions.

BACKGROUND: Asparaginase is a critical component of lymphoblastic leukemia therapy, with intravenous pegaspargase (PEG) as the current standard product. Acute adverse events (aAEs) during PEG infusion are difficult to interpret, representing a mix of drug-inactivating hypersensitivity and noninactivating reactions. Asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi (ERW) is approved for PEG hypersensitivity, but is less convenient, more expensive, and yields lower serum asparaginase activity (SAA). We began a policy of universal premedication and SAA testing for PEG, hypothesizing this would reduce aAEs and unnecessary drug substitutions. PROCEDURE: Retrospective chart review of patients receiving asparaginase before and after universal premedication before PEG was conducted, with SAA performed 1 week later. We excluded patients who had nonallergic asparaginase AEs. Primary end point was substitution to ERW. Secondary end points included aAEs, SAA testing, and cost. RESULTS: We substituted to ERW in 21 of 122 (17.2%) patients pre-policy, and 5 of 68 (7.4%) post-policy (RR, 0.427; 95% CI, 0.27-0.69, P = 0.028). All completed doses of PEG yielded excellent SAA (mean, 0.90 units/mL), compared with ERW (mean, 0.15 units/mL). PEG inactivation post-policy was seen in 2 of 68 (2.9%), one silent and one with breakthrough aAE. The rate of aAEs pre/post-policy was 17.2% versus 5.9% (RR, 0.342; 95% CI, 0.20-0.58, P = 0.017). Grade 4 aAE rate pre/post-policy was 15% versus 0%. Cost analysis predicts $125 779 drug savings alone per substitution prevented ($12 402/premedicated patient). CONCLUSIONS: Universal premedication reduced substitutions to ERW and aAE rate. SAA testing demonstrated low rates of silent inactivation, and higher SAA for PEG. A substantial savings was achieved. We propose universal premedication for PEG be standard of care.

Pegaspargase: A Review in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia.

Pegaspargase (Oncaspar®), a pegylated form of native Escherichia coli-derived L-asparaginase (hereafter referred as E. coliL-asparaginase), is indicated in the USA and EU for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) as a component of multi-agent chemotherapy in paediatric and adult patients. Relative to E. coliL-asparaginase, pegaspargase has a prolonged circulation time, thereby offering less frequent administration. Moreover, pegylation of E. coliL-asparaginase may diminish the immunogenicity of the enzyme. Based on extensive evidence, intramuscular (IM) or intravenous (IV) administration of pegaspargase as a component of a multi-agent chemotherapy is an effective first-line treatment for paediatric and adult patients with ALL, as well as for the treatment of paediatric and adult patients with ALL and hypersensitivity to E. coliL-asparaginase. Pegaspargase had a manageable tolerability profile in paediatric and adult patients with newly diagnosed ALL, with the most commonly occurring adverse events being generally consistent to that seen with E. coliL-asparaginase. Pegaspargase treatment in patients with relapsed ALL and hypersensitivity to E. coliL-asparaginase had a similar tolerability profile to that observed in patients with newly diagnosed ALL. Given the potentially reduced immunogenicity and more convenient dosage regimen over E. coliL-asparaginase, pegaspargase remains an important and effective treatment option for paediatric and adult patients with ALL, including those with hypersensitivity to E. coliL-asparaginase.

Asparaginase treatment in infants with acute lymphoblastic leukemia; pharmacokinetics and asparaginase hypersensitivity in Interfant-06.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a rare disease in infants. Asparaginase is an essential part of the treatment, and there Acute is a need to evaluate the efficiency and safety of this drug in this age group. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of intramuscularly administered native E. coli asparaginase (Asparaginase Medac®) and PEG-asparaginase (Oncaspar®) as well as hypersensitivity reactions during treatment in Interfant-06 ( www.clinicaltrials.gov : NCT01025804). All patients without hypersensitivity had sufficiently high enzyme activity levels during treatment with both preparations. Patients with hypersensitivity reactions during treatment, characterized by the presence of either or not of clinical symptoms and no measurable enzyme activity, received ineffective therapy. For optimization of the bad prognosis in infant ALL, therapeutic drug monitoring should be performed for identification of patients who should be switched to a different asparaginase preparation because of inactivation of the drug.

Experience with generic pegylated L-asparaginase in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and monitoring of serum asparaginase activity.

BACKGROUND: Pegylated asparaginase (P-Asp) though integral to acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapy is often not accessible to patients in developing countries. We share our clinical experience with generic P-Asp along with monitoring of asparaginase activity. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, patients ≤18 years of age with ALL were assigned to receive either generic P-Asp or native asparaginase (N-Asp) in a non-randomized manner. Treatment protocol was based on ALL BFM-95 backbone. The dose of P-Asp was 1500 IU/m2 by intravenous route during induction (Ia) and re-induction (IIa) phase of therapy. RESULTS: N-Asp or P-Asp was administered to 52 and 54 of the 106 eligible patients respectively. Demographic and disease characteristics were comparable in both arms. The mean trough levels for N-Asp and P-Asp were 156.87 ± 22.35 IU/L and 216.03 ± 73.40 IU/L, respectively (p value <0.001) and all patients achieved therapeutic levels during Ia. Incidence of asparaginase-attributable toxicity was similar in the two arms in both phases of treatment, although hospitalization due to noninfectious causes was more common in P-Asp arm during Ia (13% versus 0%, p value, 0.01). Clinical hypersensitivity and silent inactivation were not observed during Ia while these occurred in 13% and 5% of patients in the N-Asp arm and P-Asp arms of IIa, respectively. The 2-year event free survival for P-Asp and N-Asp groups was 84% and 80.7%, respectively (p value 0.85). CONCLUSION: Generic P-Asp was observed to be efficacious and well tolerated in our patients and adequate therapeutic levels were sustained for 2 weeks.

A Novel l-Asparaginase with low l-Glutaminase Coactivity Is Highly Efficacious against Both T- and B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemias In Vivo.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common type of pediatric cancer, although about 4 of every 10 cases occur in adults. The enzyme drug l-asparaginase serves as a cornerstone of ALL therapy and exploits the asparagine dependency of ALL cells. In addition to hydrolyzing the amino acid l-asparagine, all FDA-approved l-asparaginases also have significant l-glutaminase coactivity. Since several reports suggest that l-glutamine depletion correlates with many of the side effects of these drugs, enzyme variants with reduced l-glutaminase coactivity might be clinically beneficial if their antileukemic activity would be preserved. Here we show that novel low l-glutaminase variants developed on the backbone of the FDA-approved Erwinia chrysanthemi l-asparaginase were highly efficacious against both T- and B-cell ALL, while displaying reduced acute toxicity features. These results support the development of a new generation of safer l-asparaginases without l-glutaminase activity for the treatment of human ALL.Significance: A new l-asparaginase-based therapy is less toxic compared with FDA-approved high l-glutaminase enzymes Cancer Res; 78(6); 1549-60. ©2018 AACR.