AMCP Partnership Forum: Patient input and payer decision-making.

There has been growing consensus for the health care community to become more patient centered by considering patient needs, preferences, and values in decision-making. To advance partnership between payers and patient representatives to gather patient input and incorporate their perspective on the broad range of managed care pharmacy decisions, the AMCP held a multistakeholder Partnership Forum on December 6 and 7, 2023, in Alexandria, Virginia. Forum participants were asked to (1) identify opportunities for patient representatives to engage with payers and other managed care pharmacy decision-makers, (2) recognize challenges and propose potential solutions to establish patient engagement programs between payers and patient representatives, and (3) review and provide input on draft frameworks created by the 2023-24 AMCP Patient Voice Advisory Group. Key themes that emerged from the participant discussion included to assemble and draw upon successful examples and best practices, recognize different levels of engagement, build trust and relationships proactively, create defined access points and open dialogue channels, incorporate the patient perspective as an element of coverage decision-making, leverage existing patient data and reports, crystallize a key message furthering common goals, and facilitate ongoing education and learning.

The Medicines Center and pharmaceutical care during the civil-military dictatorship (1970-1974). / A Central de Medicamentos e a assistência farmacêutica na ditadura civil-militar (1970-1974).

The present article analyzes the formation of the first pharmaceutical care policies implemented by the Brazilian Federal Government between 1968 and 1974, during the civil-military dictatorship. It examines a set of measures adopted by the Costa e Silva and Médici governments to contain a continuous rise in the prices of raw materials and pharmaceutical specialties, with this context being essential to the creation of the Medicines Center (CEME) in 1971. The core argument of the article is that CEME represented, at the federal level, the consolidation of a policy carried out at the National Institute of Social Security (Instituto Nacional da Previdência Social - INPS) between 1968 and 1970, based on the production of inputs and medicines in public laboratories. Ended in 1970, this policy was resumed the following year with broad participation of military personnel and laboratories of the Armed Forces. The originality of this article lies in its explanation of how such support influenced the establishment of CEME in its early years. Until 1974, military members were the majority in the Board of Directors of CEME, with some of the agency's early missions being the supplier for Civil-Social Actions of the Armed Forces.

O artigo analisa a formação das primeiras políticas de assistência farmacêutica executadas pelo Governo Federal brasileiro entre 1968 e 1974, durante a ditadura civil-militar. Examina um conjunto de medidas adotadas pelos governos Costa e Silva e Médici para conter uma contínua elevação nos preços de matérias-primas e especialidades farmacêuticas, sendo este contexto fundamental para a criação da Central de Medicamentos (CEME), em 1971. O argumento central do artigo é o de que a CEME representou a consolidação, em âmbito federal, de uma política realizada no Instituto Nacional da Previdência Social (INPS) entre 1968 e 1970, baseada na produção de insumos e medicamentos em laboratórios públicos. Encerrada em 1970, esta política foi retomada no ano seguinte com ampla participação de militares e laboratórios das Forças Armadas, sendo a originalidade deste artigo explicar como tal apoio influiu na montagem da CEME em seus primeiros anos. Até 1974, os membros militares eram majoritários na Comissão Diretora da CEME, sendo algumas das primeiras missões da autarquia o abastecimento de Ações Cívico-Sociais das Forças Armadas.

Best practice in dementia health care: Key clinical practice pointers from a national conference and innovative opportunities for pharmacy practice.

OBJECTIVE: Sub-optimal care of people living with dementia has serious consequences for older populations. The 2021 Australian Royal Commission noted that a large proportion of older adults in aged care live with dementia, yet there are limitations in the knowledge and understanding of staff who care for them. In the pursuit of educating pharmacists, physicians, allied health care professionals, researchers, academics, people living with dementia and their carers, and the public, who are facing the challenges of dementia management, the 'Best Practice in Dementia Health Care' conference was held on November 10, 2022 at Western Health (Sunshine Hospital, Melbourne, Australia). METHODS: Sixteen experts presented on the current practice and challenges associated with delivering best practice dementia health care to older Australians, often highlighting how medication-related challenges impacted on their area of practice. RESULTS: Presenters highlighted the importance of individualised medication management plans, considerations of culture and Indigenous communities, the role of technology, and the impact of exercise and the physical environment on care of people living with dementia. Key clinical practice messages from each expert presenter fit into four main topics: 'navigating complexities of medication management'; 'enhancing wellbeing'; 'supportive settings and environments'; and 'programs and services improving care'. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists are crucial members of allied health care teams. They have the necessary medication and comorbidity expertise to review medication regimens, liaise with all health care providers, and provide holistic, pharmacological and non-pharmacological patient education. Towards providing best practice dementia health care, pharmacists can contribute in several ways, such as providing health practitioner education to increase understanding about medications and how they can impact on allied health practice, to ensure that medications are prescribed appropriately and safely. Further, pharmacists can make available resources to ensure people living with dementia receive culturally safe and appropriate care, while advocating for greater understanding of the history and experiences of people living with dementia to ensure care aligns with their day-to-day routines. Finally, pharmacists can provide peer-support to other health care professionals and care staff to ensure optimal management of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia. The information and insights shared at the conference can serve as a valuable resource for pharmacists and other health care professionals and researchers working to improve the lives of those living with dementia.

Impact of pharmacist-led pharmaceutical care on health-related and pharmaceutical therapy-related quality of life in patients with heart failure: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Data on the impact of pharmacist-led pharmaceutical care (PC) on pharmaceutical therapy-related and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and their sensitivities to PC provision in patients with heart failure (HF) are scarce. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the impact of pharmacist-led PC on HRQoL employing the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) and 5-level EuroQol 5 dimension (EQ-5D-5L) and on pharmaceutical therapy-related quality of life using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measure of Pharmaceutical Therapy (PROMPT) in HF patients and compare sensitivities to the PC provision of these three tools. METHODS: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary public hospital in Thailand between November 2022 and May 2023. Overall, 250 patients were randomly divided into the usual care (UC) (N = 124) and PC (N = 126) groups. Mixed effects models were used to investigate the differences in the mean change scores of PROMPT, EQ-5D-5L, and MLHFQ between the UC and PC groups. The sensitivities to PC provision of the three measures were evaluated using standardized effect sizes (SESs). RESULTS: Significant differences were found in five of eight domains and the total score of the PROMPT between the PC and UC groups (all p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found in the EQ-5D-5L and MLHFQ between the two groups (both p > 0.05). The SESs of the five domains and total score of PROMPT ranged from 0.29 to 1.65, considered small-to-large effect sizes, whereas the SESs of EQ-5D-5L and MLHFQ were -0.4 to 0, considered small effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacist-led PC can positively affect pharmaceutical therapy-related quality of life using PROMPT in HF patients. Additionally, PROMPT is more sensitive to PC provision than EQ-5D-5L and MLHFQ.

Reprint of: Implementation of depression management by ambulatory care pharmacists in the primary care setting.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, depression is one of the most common mental health disorders. Ambulatory care pharmacists play a critical role in assisting with medication and dosage selection, identifying and managing drug interactions and adverse effects, and increasing medication adherence. Existing data on depression management by ambulatory care pharmacists trained in primary care is limited and outdated. OBJECTIVES: This study provides insight into current practices for depression management by primary care pharmacy specialists within an academic health center and how pharmacist interventions may impact functional outcomes of depression. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study analyzed 27 patients with a primary care physician within the health system who were seen by an ambulatory care pharmacist for depression. Subjects were excluded if they were under 18 years old, pregnant, or had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or dementia. The primary outcome was characterization of pharmacist interventions for treatment of depression. Secondary outcomes included change in depressive symptoms, as measured by the patient health questionnaire (PHQ), characterization of adverse effects correlated with medications for depression, and utilization of pharmacogenomics testing and results. RESULTS: Of 27 patients seen by a pharmacist for depression management, 38 total interventions were made, with an average of 1.77 interventions per patient. The most common intervention was new medication initiation (32%). Average PHQ-9 scores dropped from 14.9 to 7.3 twelve weeks following the initial pharmacist visit. Only 6 patients reported adverse effects to a current antidepressant during their visit with the pharmacist, and only 2 of these cases warranted a change in therapy. Ten patients obtained pharmacogenomic testing with pharmacist facilitation. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists in the primary care setting are positioned to be an additional resource for depression management and can offer a wide variety of interventions to improve patient health.

Reprint of: Impact of outpatient pharmacist dispensing in an opioid use disorder clinic.

BACKGROUND: Medications for opioid use disorder are effective in reducing opioid deaths, but access can be an issue. Relocating an outpatient pharmacist for weekly buprenorphine dispensing in an outpatient clinic may facilitate coverage for buprenorphine and mitigate access and counseling barriers. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate whether staffing an outpatient resident pharmacist to dispense in the buprenorphine clinic had a positive impact on (1) mean cost per prescription charged to charity care and (2) basic elements of patient satisfaction with the on-site pharmacist. METHODS: Patient demographics, buprenorphine formulation, insurance type, and uncovered costs were abstracted from dispensing records in the 16 weeks before the pharmacist clinic presence and 16 weeks with the pharmacist present. The difference in insurance types across the 2 periods was tested using a chi-square test, and the mean uncovered prescription costs charged to charity care for the 2 periods was compared using an independent-samples t test. A brief survey was administered while the pharmacist was on-site to evaluate satisfaction, which was analyzed with frequencies of "yes" responses and free-text comments. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients received buprenorphine during both the pre- and postperiods. Once the pharmacist was on-site, more patients used Medicaid or private insurance, decreasing the mean uncovered cost per prescription from $55.00 (SD 68.7) to $36.97 (SD 60.1) (P = 0.002). Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with most reporting they were more likely to ask questions, pick up their prescriptions, and take their medicine with the pharmacist in the clinic. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacist successfully transitioned a portion of prescriptions previously covered by charity care to Medicaid or private insurance. This shift led to a decrease in charity care costs by $2950.20 and a reduction in the average uncovered cost per prescription. The pharmacist's presence in the clinic seemed to reduce barriers especially related to inconvenience.

The evolving role of pharmacists in depression care: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, depression is known to contribute significantly to the global burden of disease. Considering pharmacists are among the most approachable healthcare providers, they are well-placed to assist people with depression achieve positive treatment outcomes. AIM: The primary aim was to examine the evidence regarding pharmacists' roles in interventions, outcomes, and barriers to implementation within depression care globally, with the secondary aim focusing on the Arab region. METHOD: A scoping review was conducted according to the PRISMA-ScR extension guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute framework, using Scopus, Cochrane, ProQuest, and Medline databases for studies worldwide and within the Arab region (22 Arab-league countries). Article selection, along with data extraction, analysis, and narrative synthesis were performed independently by two reviewers. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. RESULTS: Forty studies reporting various roles and services provided by pharmacists in depression management were included. Most articles (24) described studies on pharmacist-led specific/single interventions/management strategies, and 16 described studies in which pharmacists provided comprehensive or team-based services. The majority of studies reported positive impact on patient outcomes. In accordance with the secondary aim, only three studies assessed various pharmacists' services for people with depression in the Arab region. Barriers to effective depression-related care included time constraints and training needs. CONCLUSION: This scoping review supports the expanding role of pharmacists in depression management. The interventions, impact, challenges, and research gaps identified serve as preliminary evidence for advocating for an expanded pharmacists' scope of practice in mental health, both globally and in the Arab region.

Reducing disparities in medication use: Responding to managed care pharmacy's imperatives.

Although disparities and inequities in health status and access to health care services have long existed in our nation, the COVID-19 pandemic cast a bright spotlight on them. Communities of color and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations were disproportionally affected by the pandemic. These same populations suffer from higher prevalences of chronic illnesses, which puts them at greater risk for poor outcomes associated with SARS-CoV-2. At long last, in the wake of the pandemic, the health care community began to acknowledge improving health equity as a public health imperative. In a November 2020 JMCP Viewpoints article, Dr Stephen Kogut of the University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy presented an insightful analysis of disparities in medication use (DMU) and offered 4 suggestions on how the managed care pharmacy community can help eliminate DMU. This Viewpoints article assesses what progress has been made in addressing those imperatives and proposes further steps that should be taken. Although the managed care pharmacy community has broadly acknowledged the existence of DMU and taken steps to mitigate them, there is much work to do in examining and improving benefit design and coverage policies; collecting and reporting data on race and ethnicity and DMU; incorporating the perspectives of patients, including those representing minority populations, in benefit design and coverage policies; and addressing the challenges associated with traditional cost-sharing models. The entire managed care pharmacy community, including AMCP and other membership organizations, must remain steadfast in its efforts to improve health equity and eliminate DMU.

Optimizing medication guidance support for patients with cancer pain: development and evaluation of a pharmaceutical care system for healthcare professionals.

BACKGROUND: Effective management of cancer pain critically depends on timely medication administration and adherence to precise medication guidelines. In the context of limited time and a busy healthcare environment, tailoring the optimal medication schedule for each patient with cancer pain presents a significant challenge for physicians and clinical pharmacists. METHODS: To address this challenge, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of healthcare professionals' needs in guiding cancer pain medication. By developing core features based on key user needs and continuously updating them, we have created the Universal Medication Schedule System (UMSS). We invited 20 physicians and pharmacists specializing in oncology or cancer pain to trial the system and assessed UMSS usage through distributed questionnaires. RESULTS: We identified five key needs of healthcare professionals in cancer pain medication guidance. Based on these needs, we (1) constructed a comprehensive drug information database, including basic information for 1135 drugs, 130,590 drug interaction data entries, and 1409 individual medication timing constraints, and (2) developed a web-based system that provides essential reference information such as drug interactions and dietary restrictions. It can create medication schedules and provide medication education tailored to the patient's daily routine. Participating evaluators unanimously agreed (100%) that the system aids in accurately assessing the risks of polypharmacy and quickly scheduling medication regimens. CONCLUSION: UMSS, by offering personalized medication schedule support, assists healthcare professionals in better managing patients' medication treatment plans. However, further improvements are needed in the automation of database updates and maintenance, as well as in integrating it with electronic health records.

Characterising pharmacists' interventions in chronic non-cancer pain care: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Chronic non-cancer pain may affect up to 51% of the general population. Pharmacist interventions have shown promise in enhancing patient safety and outcomes. However, our understanding of the scope of pharmacists' interventions remains incomplete. AIM: Our goal was to characterise pharmacists' interventions for the management of chronic non-cancer pain. METHOD: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO via Ovid, CINAHL via EBSCO databases and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched. Abstracts and full texts were independently screened by two reviewers. Data were extracted by one reviewer, and validated by the second. Outcomes of studies were charted using the dimensions of the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT). RESULTS: Forty-eight reports were included. Interventions ensuring appropriate drug prescription occurred in 37 (79%) studies. Patient education and healthcare professional education were reported in 28 (60%) and 5 (11%) studies, respectively. Therapy monitoring occurred in 17 (36%) studies. Interventions regularly involved interprofessional collaboration. A median of 75% of reported outcome domains improved due to pharmacist interventions, especially patient disposition (adherence), medication safety and satisfaction with therapy. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists' interventions enhanced the management of chronic non-cancer pain. Underreported outcome domains and interventions, such as medication management, merit further investigation.

A Pharmacist Clinician Model as part of a collaborative clinical workforce: A philosophical critique.

The term 'clinician' is not reserved for any healthcare professional group. However, there is a general acceptance that a clinician would have the knowledge, skills and behaviours to enable them to clinically assess and manage a patient autonomously. The expectation, in a modern collaborative healthcare system, is that this work would be completed as a part of a planned and integrated multi-disciplinary care delivery structure, where any given clinician delivers a devolved element of that patient's care. Forthcoming changes to regulation and professional development pathways in the UK will have a profound impact on pharmacist professional identity and practice. From 2026, all new UK pharmacist registrants will have full independent prescribing rights. A paradigm shift is expected to enable the development of a Pharmacist Clinician Model, incorporating pharmaceutical care needs with wider clinical assessment, diagnostic, and clinical management responsibilities. Consideration is given to this model and its implications. Changes to regulation, policy, education, and the governance required to deliver safe and effective pharmacist clinicians are outlined. A philosophical critique on the nature of being a clinician, and the differentiation of pharmacist clinician roles compared to other healthcare professions, is given. A further examination of the projected risks and expected benefits of this transformative practice model are then explored.

Building an effective medicines optimisation model: a health system approach.

This commentary narrates on the building of an effective and innovative medicines optimisation model. It discusses the essential features, emphasizes the need, and considers the strong health and pharmacy system as a prerequisite before such a model could be built. The paper argues that it is important to strengthen the health system before the elements of pharmaceutical care and medicine optimisation can take shape. It discusses the discourse and interplay between medicine use and medicine access research. The other important elements to include are the "selection of medicines by health technology assessment", "economic evaluation of pharmacy services", "pharmacists' remuneration by the government", "Health system strengthening status", "quality use of generic medicines programmes", "rationale prescribing", "access to medicines and medicines pricing", "medicines advertising" and the "state of pharmacy practice and the development of the pharmacist's role". A set of different high-, middle- and low-income countries are used to provide examples of the status of the health system and the subsequent development of pharmacy practice and medicines optimisation. The countries include the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Pakistan, Türkiye, Malaysia, India, and Pakistan.

Resident pharmacist participation in shared medical appointments in palliative care in São Paulo, Brazil: experience and contributions.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the resident pharmacist's participation in Shared Medical Appointments (SMA) in palliative care. METHODS: The resident pharmacist participated in face-to-face SMA with the attending physician, medical and gerontology students, and a nurse. KEY FINDINGS: The resident pharmacist supported interdisciplinary discussions and performed pharmaceutical interventions. He helped raise awareness about the effective, safe, and convenient use of medicines, helping improve the quality of life of patients and caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: Providing pharmaceutical care to patients in palliative care helped to improve the quality of clinical services offered to these patients, as well as adding value to resident pharmacists' interprofessional practice.

Leverage points for establishing clinical decision-maker as a vital component of pharmacists' professional identity.

This commentary explores how a change in the professional identity of pharmacists from medicines supplier to clinical decision-maker might take place. Three leverage points are identified that support this change. The first leverage point involves workplace culture. Pharmacists require workplaces that support them to assume direct responsibility for drug therapy decisions that may not have traditionally been part of pharmacy practice. The second leverage point involves terminology. Pharmacists need to be able to name and describe the process they use when making decisions about drug therapy. The third leverage point encompasses pharmacy education. Future pharmacists require a foundation that enables them to mobilize their knowledge and skills about drug therapy to act as clinical decision-makers with patients that require complex care. By acting on multiple leverage points, advocates for change in the pharmacy profession can assist pharmacists to establish themselves as decision-makers about drug therapy, shift their professional identity, and reformulate their view of the profession.