Efficacy and safety study of targeted small-molecule drugs in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND: Targeted small-molecule drugs in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have attracted increasing attention from clinical investigators. However, there is still a lack of evidence on the difference in the efficacy and safety of different targeted small-molecule drugs. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of different targeted small-molecule drugs for SLE. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on targeted small-molecule drugs in the treatment of SLE in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched as of April 25, 2023. Risk of bias assessment was performed for included studies using the Cochrane's tool for evaluating the risk of bias. The primary outcome indicators were SRI-4 response, BICLA response, and adverse reaction. Because different doses and courses of treatment were used in the included studies, Bayesian network meta-regression was used to investigate the effect of different doses and courses of treatment on efficacy and safety. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were included, involving 3,622 patients and 9 targeted small-molecule drugs. The results of network meta-analysis showed that, in terms of improving SRI-4, Deucravacitinib was significantly superior to that of Baricitinib (RR = 1.32, 95% CI (1.04, 1.68), P < 0.05). Deucravacitinib significantly outperformed the placebo in improving BICLA response (RR = 1.55, 95% CI (1.20, 2.02), P < 0.05). In terms of adverse reactions, targeted small-molecule drugs did not significantly increase the risk of adverse events as compared to placebo (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Based on the evidence obtained in this study, the differences in the efficacy of targeted small-molecule drugs were statistically significant as compared to placebo, but the difference in the safety was not statistically significant. The dose and the course of treatment had little impact on the effect of targeted small-molecule drugs. Deucravacitinib could significantly improve BICLA response and SRI-4 response without significantly increasing the risk of AEs. Therefore, Deucravacitinib is very likely to be the best intervention measure. Due to the small number of included studies, more high-quality clinical evidence is needed to further verify the efficacy and safety of targeted small-molecule drugs for SLE.

Model of Chronic Itch in Aged Mice: Beneficial Effects of Drugs Affecting Descending Modulatory Systems.

Pruritus in the elderly, particularly those cases without skin dryness or other identifiable causes, makes treatment challenging due to the lack of evidence regarding the therapeutic effects of antipruritics. This study proposes an age-related alloknesis mouse model for an evaluation system for such cases, and aimed to investigate the effectiveness and mechanisms of action of several drugs commonly used as antipruritics in Japan, utilizing this model. Mice 69-80 weeks old were used as aged mice, and the level of mechanical alloknesis was counted as the number of scratching behaviours in response to innocuous stimuli. Bepotastine, neurotropin, pregabalin, baricitinib, and abrocitinib were used as antipruritics, and yohimbine and methysergide as inhibitors of the descending inhibitory pathway. The findings suggest that mechanical alloknesis in aged mice is a suitable animal model for assessing pruritus in the elderly without xerosis, and pregabalin, neurotropin, baricitinib, and abrocitinib may be effective antipruritics in the elderly through activating both the noradrenergic and serotonergic descending inhibitory pathways. These findings may be useful for the selection of antipruritics for pruritus in the elderly without skin lesions or dryness.

Distinct effects of rosuvastatin and rosuvastatin/ezetimibe on senescence markers of CD8+ T cells in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial.

Objectives: Chronic low-grade inflammation is widely recognized as a pathophysiological defect contributing to ß-cell failure in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Statin therapy is known to ameliorate CD8+ T cell senescence, a mediator of chronic inflammation. However, the additional immunomodulatory roles of ezetimibe are not fully understood. Therefore, we investigated the effect of statin or statin/ezetimibe combination treatment on T cell senescence markers. Methods: In this two-group parallel and randomized controlled trial, we enrolled 149 patients with T2DM whose low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was 100 mg/dL or higher. Patients were randomly assigned to either the rosuvastatin group (N=74) or the rosuvastatin/ezetimibe group (N=75). The immunophenotype of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and metabolic profiles were analyzed using samples from baseline and post-12 weeks of medication. Results: The fractions of CD8+CD57+ (senescent CD8+ T cells) and CD4+FoxP3+ (Treg) significantly decreased after intervention in the rosuvastatin/ezetimibe group (-4.5 ± 14.1% and -1.2 ± 2.3%, respectively), while these fractions showed minimal change in the rosuvastatin group (2.8 ± 9.4% and 1.4 ± 1.5%, respectively). The degree of LDL-C reduction was correlated with an improvement in HbA1c (R=0.193, p=0.021). Changes in the CD8+CD57+ fraction positively correlated with patient age (R=0.538, p=0.026). Notably, the fraction change in senescent CD8+ T cells showed no significant relationship with changes in either HbA1c (p=0.314) or LDL-C (p=0.592). Finally, the ratio of naïve to memory CD8+ T cells increased in the rosuvastatin/ezetimibe group (p=0.011), but not in the rosuvastatin group (p=0.339). Conclusions: We observed a reduction in senescent CD8+ T cells and an increase in the ratio of naive to memory CD8+ T cells with rosuvastatin/ezetimibe treatment. Our results demonstrate the immunomodulatory roles of ezetimibe in combination with statins, independent of improvements in lipid or HbA1c levels.

[First-line treatment of hypercholesterolemia : start with statin monotherapy or ezetimibe-statin combination ?] / Comment je traite...une hypercholestérolémie en première intention : statine seule ou combinaison ézétimibe-statine d'emblée ?

Hypercholesterolemia, especially LDL-C («Low-Density-Lipoprotein - Cholesterol¼), is a major cardiovascular risk factor, especially for coronary artery disease. Patients at high or very high cardiovascular risk should reach LDL concentrations as low as possible («the lower, the better¼), with a reduction of at least 50 % from baseline levels according to the most recent guidelines, especially those in secondary prevention. An ezetimibe-statin combination most often allows to reach this goal thanks to a complementary action. The objectives of this article are to remind the dual actions of these two medications, to summarize the clinical evidence showing not only a remarkable cholesterol-lowering effect but also a reduction in cardiovascular events in both controlled trials and observational real-life studies, to specify the positioning of this combined oral therapy in the last international guidelines and to mention pharmaceutical specialties that combine ezetimibe with a statin available for the practitioner.

L'hypercholestérolémie, en particulier le LDL-C («Low-Density-Lipoprotein - Cholesterol¼), est un facteur de risque cardiovasculaire, notamment coronarien, majeur. Les patients à haut ou très haut risque cardiovasculaire doivent atteindre des concentrations de LDL les plus basses possibles (concept du «the lower, the better¼), avec une diminution d'au moins 50 % des valeurs de base selon les dernières recommandations, tout particulièrement ceux en prévention secondaire. Une combinaison ézétimibe-statine permet souvent d'atteindre cet objectif grâce à une action complémentaire. Le but de cet article est de rappeler la dualité des mécanismes d'action de ces deux approches, de résumer les évidences cliniques montrant non seulement un remarquable effet hypocholestérolémiant mais aussi une réduction des événements cardiovasculaires dans les essais cliniques et dans les études observationnelles de vraie vie, de préciser la position de cette combinaison thérapeutique orale dans les dernières recommandations internationales et de mentionner les spécialités pharmaceutiques associant l'ézétimibe à une statine mises à la disposition du praticien.

Treatment with Janus kinase inhibitors in juvenile dermatomyositis: A review of the literature.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have been increasingly used in the treatment of juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). This review aims to comprehensively analyze previous studies concerning the utilization of JAK inhibitors in JDM patients. METHODS: We conducted a thorough review of MEDLINE and Scopus databases, spanning from their inception to September 1st, 2023, to identify articles involving JDM patients treated with JAK inhibitors. RESULTS: Our literature search yielded 26 articles that encompassed 195 patients with JDM who received JAK inhibitors. The median (min-max) age of the patients was 4.9 (1-17) years (F/M:1.2). The most frequently used JAK inhibitor was tofacitinib (57.4 %), and improvement was achieved in 89.7 % of patients treated with tofacitinib. The improvement rate for ruxolitinib, which was the second most frequently used JAK inhibitor (27.2 %), was 69.2 %. For baricitinib (15.4 %), the improvement rate was 92.7 %. The most prevalent indication for JAK inhibitor use was resistant/recurrent skin involvement (34.7 %) followed by resistant/recurrent muscle involvement (28.6 %). Adverse events were reported in 72.1 % of the patients; an increase in infections (especially upper respiratory tract infections) was the most common side effect. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that JAK inhibitors may be a good therapeutic option, particularly in the management of refractory JDM cases with an acceptable safety profile. However, further controlled studies are essential to establish a higher level of evidence for the optimal use of JAK inhibitors in JDM treatment.

JAK inhibitors in the treatment of adult patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a retrospective monocentric experience.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors (JAKi) in a monocentric cohort of adult patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: Patients attending a rheumatology transition clinic were retrospectively included in case of: i) JIA diagnosis according to current classification criteria (1); ii) age ≥18 years and iii) treatment with JAKi for at least 3 months. RESULTS: Seventeen adult patients with JIA were treated with JAKi (as first JAKi, 9 patients (52.9%) received tofacitinib and 8 (47.1%) baricitinib). At 3 months after JAKi initiation, 8 patients (47%) achieved a response and 4 patients (23.5%) achieved disease remission (3 patients with baricitinib and 1 with tofacitinib, 37.5% vs. 16.7%, p=0.294). None of those with systemic JIA and enthesitis-related arthritis obtained remission; the remission rate at 3 months was higher, although not significantly, in the oligoarticular subset compared to the polyarticular subset (37.5% vs. 20%). Patients with ≤1 active joint involvement at JAKi start had a higher remission rate (50% vs. 22.2%). Subjects who achieved remission on JAKi had a significantly lower pre-treatment DAS28-CRP compared to those with still active disease (p=0.010, Mann-Whitney U=4). A pre-treatment DAS28-CRP <3.76 predicted response to JAKi with 100% sensitivity and 84.6% specificity (p=0.023). The remission rate was lower among patients who had been treated with ≥2 biological drugs before JAKi start (9% vs. 66.7%; p=0.05). One patient in concomitant treatment with leflunomide developed severe arterial hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: JAKi may represent an effective and safe treatment option for adult JIA patients with low/moderate disease activity, particularly in case of oligoarticular involvement.

Azetidines Kill Multidrug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis without Detectable Resistance by Blocking Mycolate Assembly.

Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of global morbidity and mortality resulting from infectious disease, with over 10.6 million new cases and 1.4 million deaths in 2021. This global emergency is exacerbated by the emergence of multidrug-resistant MDR-TB and extensively drug-resistant XDR-TB; therefore, new drugs and new drug targets are urgently required. From a whole cell phenotypic screen, a series of azetidines derivatives termed BGAz, which elicit potent bactericidal activity with MIC99 values <10 µM against drug-sensitive Mycobacterium tuberculosis and MDR-TB, were identified. These compounds demonstrate no detectable drug resistance. The mode of action and target deconvolution studies suggest that these compounds inhibit mycobacterial growth by interfering with cell envelope biogenesis, specifically late-stage mycolic acid biosynthesis. Transcriptomic analysis demonstrates that the BGAz compounds tested display a mode of action distinct from the existing mycobacterial cell wall inhibitors. In addition, the compounds tested exhibit toxicological and PK/PD profiles that pave the way for their development as antitubercular chemotherapies.

Treatment of Ezetimibe lowers total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic dogs with hyperadorenocorticism.

Ezetimibe is a cholesterol absorption inhibitor that blocks the intestinal absorption of both biliary and dietary cholesterol, thereby lowering primarily low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-chol) in human studies. This study aimed to investigate the effects of ezetimibe on dyslipidemia control in nine dogs with hypercholesterolemia. Changes in total cholesterol (T-chol) and each lipoprotein fractions were evaluated at 0, 2, and 4 months following initiation of ezetimibe treatment. A significant decrease in T-chol was observed, and a mean T-chol concentration below 400 mg/dL was achieved at 2 and 4 months. Furthermore, a significant decrease in LDL-chol was observed (-53.3% and -64.3% at 2 and 4 months, respectively). Taken together, treatment of ezetimibe could lower LDL-chol levels in dogs with hypercholesterolemia.

Ezetimibe treatment reduces oxidized low-density lipoprotein in biliary cirrhotic rats.

BACKGROUND: In liver cirrhosis, chronic inflammation is associated with an increase in oxidative stress, and subsequently an increase in the concentration of oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL). Ezetimibe is a lipid-lowering agent with anti-inflammation and anti-oxidative stress activities. This study aimed to investigate the effect of ezetimibe treatment on ox-LDL in cirrhotic rats. METHODS: Biliary cirrhosis was induced in Sprague-Dawley rats with common bile duct ligation (BDL). Sham-operated rats served as surgical controls. Ezetimibe (10 mg/kg/d) or vehicle was administered in the sham-operated or BDL rats for 4 weeks, after which hemodynamic parameters, biochemistry data, and oxidative stress were evaluated. Plasma and intrahepatic ox-LDL levels were also examined, and hepatic proteins were analyzed to explore the mechanism of ezetimibe treatment. RESULTS: The BDL rats had typical features of cirrhosis including jaundice, impaired liver function, hyperlipidemia, and elevated ox-LDL levels compared to the sham-operated rats. Ezetimibe treatment did not affect hemodynamics, liver biochemistry, or plasma lipid levels. However, it significantly reduced oxidative stress, plasma levels of ox-LDL, and tumor necrosis factor α. In addition, ezetimibe upregulated the hepatic protein expression of an ox-LDL scavenger (lectin-like ox-LDL rececptor-1), which resulted in reductions in intrahepatic ox-LDL and fat accumulation in the BDL rats. Nevertheless, ezetimibe treatment did not ameliorate hepatic inflammation or liver fibrosis. CONCLUSION: Ezetimibe reduced plasma and intrahepatic ox-LDL levels in the cirrhotic rats. Furthermore, it ameliorated intrahepatic fat accumulation and oxidative stress. However, ezetimibe did not alleviate hepatic fibrosis or inflammation in the biliary cirrhotic rats.

Treatment of congenital Langerhans cell histiocytosis with cobimetinib.

We report a case of congenital multisystem Langerhans cell histiocytosis with cutaneous and hematopoietic involvement. After the failure of first-line (vinblastine and prednisolone) and second-line (vincristine and cytarabine) therapies, treatment with cobimetinib, a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitor, led to the remission of disease and a sustained response after 11 months of ongoing treatment. Protein kinase inhibitors targeting BRAF or MEK could represent a promising future therapeutic option, also in children with LCH.

Efficacy of baricitinib for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by abnormal autoantibody production, inflammation, and organ damage. Most SLE treatment strategies aim to induce remission or reduce disease activity while avoiding flares. Baricitinib has been used effectively to manage various inflammatory diseases, and some randomized controlled trials (RCT) have shown that it is beneficial in treating SLE. The current study aims to assess the efficacy of baricitinib in treating SLE patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Various databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Science Direct were searched to obtain eligible studies for the present meta-analysis. Data such as baseline characteristics of patients, doses of the baricitinib, follow-up duration, and treatment outcome in the form of SLE responder index-4 (SRI-4) and lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) were extracted. Combined odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and probability values were calculated to study the efficacy of baricitinib in treating SLE patients. A p-value less than .05 was taken as significant. Comprehensive meta-analysis v3 was used for all analyses. RESULTS: Three articles were found eligible for the present meta-analysis comprising 614 patients with placebo, 614 SLE patients receiving 4 mg, and 621 patients with 2 mg of baricitinib. Meta-analysis revealed a beneficial effect of 4 mg baricitinib in SLE patients compared to placebo, as measured by an increase in the SRI-4 (p = .006, OR = 1.370) and LLDAS (p = .083, OR = 1.252) rates. In contrast to the placebo group, however, patients receiving 2 mg of baricitinib exhibited no significant improvement. The trial sequential analysis revealed the need for additional RCTs to determine the role of baricitinib in treating SLE patients. CONCLUSION: In treating SLE patients, administrating a higher dose of baricitinib (4 mg) may be effective. However, additional RCTs in different populations with larger sample sizes are required to validate our findings.