Skin recruitment of monomyeloid precursors involves human herpesvirus-6 reactivation in drug allergy.

BACKGROUND: In drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS), latent human herpesvirus (HHV)-6 is frequently reactivated in association with flaring of symptoms such as fever and hepatitis. We recently demonstrated an emergence of monomyeloid precursors expressing HHV-6 antigen in the circulation during this clinical course. METHODS: To clarify the mechanism of HHV-6 reactivation, we immunologically investigated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), skin-infiltrating cells, and lymphocytes expanded from skin lesions of patients with DIHS. RESULTS: The circulating monomyeloid precursors in the patients with DIHS were mostly CD11b(+) CD13(+) CD14(-) CD16(high) and showed substantial expression of skin-associated molecules, such as CCR4. CD13(+) CD14(-) cells were also found in the DIHS skin lesions, suggesting skin recruitment of this cell population. We detected high levels of high-mobility group box (HMGB)-1 in blood and skin lesions in the active phase of patients with DIHS and showed that recombinant HMGB-1 had functional chemoattractant activity for monocytes/monomyeloid precursors in vitro. HHV-6 infection of the skin-resident CD4(+) T cells was confirmed by the presence of its genome and antigen. This infection was likely to be mediated by monomyeloid precursors recruited to the skin, because normal CD4(+) T cells gained HHV-6 antigen after in vitro coculture with highly virus-loaded monomyeloid precursors from the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that monomyeloid precursors harboring HHV-6 are navigated by HMGB-1 released from damaged skin and probably cause HHV-6 transmission to skin-infiltrating CD4(+) T cells, which is an indispensable event for HHV-6 replication. These findings implicate the skin as a cryptic and primary site for initiating HHV-6 reactivation.

HSP10 selective preference for myeloid and megakaryocytic precursors in normal human bone marrow.

Heat shock proteins (HSPs) constitute a heterogeneous family of proteins involved in cell homeostasis. During cell life they are involved in harmful insults, as well as in immune and inflammatory reactions. It is known that they regulate gene expression, and cell proliferation, differentiation and death. HSP60 is a mitochondrial chaperonin, highly preserved during evolution, responsible of protein folding. Its function is strictly dependent on HSP10 in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic elements. We investigated the presence and the expression of HSP60 and HSP10 in a series of 20 normal human bone marrow specimens (NHBM) by the means of immunohistochemistry. NHBM showed no expression of HSP60, probably due to its being below the detectable threshold, as already demonstrated in other normal human tissues. By contrast, HSP10 showed a selective positivity for myeloid and megakaryocytic lineages. The positivity was restricted to precursor cells, while mature elements were constantly negative. We postulate that HSP10 plays a role in bone marrow cell differentiation other than being a mitochondrial co-chaperonin. The present data emphasize the role of HSP10 during cellular homeostasis and encourage further investigations in this field.

Stroma-mediated granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) control of myelopoiesis: spatial organisation of intercellular interactions.

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is one of the major cytokines involved in control of haemopoiesis both in bone marrow and in extramedullar sites. Its biological activity depends upon the composition and physicochemical properties of the microenvironment provided by the supporting stroma. GM-CSF activity is modulated and controlled by the stromal heparan-sulphate proteoglycans, but their optimal interaction occurs only at low pH. We questioned whether the microenvironment organisation of the interface between stroma and haemopoietic cells provides such conditions. We studied myeloid progenitor proliferation in contact with bone marrow-derived and extramedullar stromas using electron microscopy and selective labelling of pericellular components. We present evidence that, upon interaction, the two cell types reorganise their interface both in shape and molecular composition. Haemopoietic cells extend projections that considerably increase the area of intercellular contact, and stromal cells form lamellipodia and carry out a redistribution of membrane-associated sialylated glycoconjugates and proteoglycans. Such rearrangements lead to extensive capping of negatively charged molecules at the interface between the supporting stroma and the haemopoietic cells, leading potentially to a local decrease in pH. Our results indicate that the distribution of negative charges at the cellular interface may be responsible for the selectivity of cell response to GM-CSF.

Flow cytometric method for enumeration and classification of reactive immature granulocyte populations.

We developed a flow cytometric method for the enumeration and classification of nonmalignant immature granulocytes (IG). In this study, IG are defined as most immature (IG stage 1: promyelocytes and myelocytes) and as more mature (IG stage 2: metamyelocytes). Blood specimens from 46 patients with documented infectious or inflammatory disease and known presence of IG (by routine manual microscopy) were analyzed. For a reference manual differential count, we used a 400 white blood cell (WBC) differential and separated granulocytes into promyelocytes and myelocytes combined, metamyelocytes, and included band cells in the mature, segmented neutrophil population. The flow cytometric method is based on three-color staining of whole, anticoagulated blood with CD45-PerCP, CD16-FITC, and CD11b-PE-labeled monoclonal antibodies and a three-step gating procedure. The flow cytometric results were confirmed by cell sorting and microscopic evaluation of the sorted cells. A total of 10,000 events, excluding debris, were recorded per specimen and IG stage 1 (CD16-/CD11b-), IG stage 2 (CD16-/CD11b+), and mature neutrophils (CD16+/CD11b+) were categorized. Regression and correlation between flow cytometric IG and the manual differential showed y = 1.34x + 0.95, r(2) = 0.86 for IG stages 1 and 2 combined versus promyelocytes, myelocytes, and metamyelocytes. For IG stage 1 versus microscopic counts of promyelocytes and myelocytes, the results were y = 1.53x + 1.24, r(2) = 0.76; for IG stage 2 versus manual metamyelocyte count, y = 0.77x + 0.21, r(2) = 0.58. Reproducibility of the flow cytometric method showed a coefficient of variation (CV) of 6.8% for all IG combined compared with a CV of 50.2% for manual differential IG count (based on a routine 100 WBC count). Samples were found stable at least 12 h at 25 degrees C and at least 48 h at 4 degrees C for flow cytometry. After staining and lysing, the sample was stable for at least 120 min at room temperature. We analyzed samples from patients with myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative disease separately. We found that CD16- mature neutrophils falsely elevated the flow cytometric IG count. Similar results were obtained in blood from patients treated with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). Although this restricts the use of the method somewhat, we believe that this flow cytometric method is useful for enumerating reactive IG, as well as for evaluating automated methods for IG identification by hematology analyzers.