Comparative efficacy of metformin combined with cabergoline versus metformin alone in patients with PCOS and hyperprolactinemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Isntroduction. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a multifaceted endocrine-gynecological condition affecting a substantial number of women during their reproductive years. Metformin (MET) has been shown to improve ovarian function in PCOS-related conditions, while cabergoline is recognized for its powerful and sustained ability to reduce prolactin levels. This study investigates the potential impact of combining cabergoline with metformin while comparing it with metformin alone in the treatment of PCOS alongside hyperprolactinemia. METHOD: To gather data, we searched PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Central. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials involving patients with PCOS and hyperprolactinemia. Outcome measures included changes in the levels of prolactin, testosterone, DHEAS, BMI and menstrual irregularities. RevMan version 5.4 was used to analyze outcomes. RESULT: This study incorporated three Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) involving 405 participants in total. Patients receiving a combination of metformin and cabergoline experienced significant reductions in prolactin and testosterone levels (p= <0.0001 and p=<0.0001, respectively). Conversely, alterations in DHEAS levels and BMI did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.19 and p = 0.71, respectively). Notably, women solely prescribed metformin exhibited significantly higher rates of menstrual irregularities compared to those receiving both metformin and cabergoline (p=<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our analysis underscores the synergistic effect achieved by pairing metformin and cabergoline in patients with PCOS and hyperprolactinemia. However, we encountered only a restricted number of studies meeting our criteria. It is imperative to consistently assess the combined effects of metformin and cabergoline to gain deeper insights into their effectiveness in addressing PCOS and hyperprolactinemia.

Long-term use of clomiphene in male macroprolactinomas with persistent hypogonadism.

BACKGROUND: Men with macroprolactinoma can present persistent hypogonadism despite normoprolactinemia achieved with clinical and/or neurosurgical treatment. Usually, testosterone replacement therapy is indicated. Nevertheless, although off-label, clomiphene citrate (CC), a selective estrogen receptor modulator, has also been used, mainly when fertility is an issue. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of CC in recovering the gonadal axis in men with macroprolactinoma, with or without hyperprolactinemia, and evaluate its safety as a long-term therapy. METHODS: This is a retrospective study including 10 men with macroprolactinoma on cabergoline treatment and persistent hypogonadism. All patients received initially 50 mg/d of CC. RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis of prolactinomas was 34 (range, 26-60) years old. All patients were treated with cabergoline at a median maximum dose of 2 (1-7) mg/week, with a median time of treatment of 8.5 (2-15) years. Prolactin was still above the normal range when CC was introduced only in two patients. The mean duration of CC therapy was 3.2 (±2.8) years. Prolactin levels maintained stable (p = 0.252) and testosterone increased (p = 0.027) significantly on CC therapy. Tumor size remained stable. Eight patients (80%) maintained testosterone above 300 ng/dL and were classified as responders. Three responders succeeded in using a lower dose of CC and one of them completed withdrawal CC and maintained eugonadism. There were no side effects or safety concerns reported. CONCLUSION: CC should be seen as a safe treatment option for men with macroprolactinoma and persistent hypogonadism.

Brazilian multicenter study on pegvisomant treatment in acromegaly

ABSTRACT Objective Investigate the therapeutic response of acromegaly patients to pegvisomant (PEGV) in a real-life, Brazilian multicenter study. Subjects and methods Characteristics of acromegaly patients treated with PEGV were reviewed at diagnosis, just before and during treatment. All patients with at least two IGF-I measurements on PEGV were included. Efficacy was defined as any normal IGF-I measurement during treatment. Safety data were reviewed. Predictors of response were determined by comparing controlled versus uncontrolled patients. Results 109 patients [61 women; median age at diagnosis 34 years; 95.3% macroadenomas] from 10 Brazilian centers were studied. Previous treatment included surgery (89%), radiotherapy (34%), somatostatin receptor ligands (99%), and cabergoline (67%). Before PEGV, median levels of GH, IGF-I and IGF-I % of upper limit of normal were 4.3 µg/L, 613 ng/mL, and 209%, respectively. Pre-diabetes/diabetes was present in 48.6% and tumor remnant in 71% of patients. Initial dose was 10 mg/day in all except 4 cases, maximum dose was 30 mg/day, and median exposure time was 30.5 months. PEGV was used as monotherapy in 11% of cases. Normal IGF-I levels was obtained in 74.1% of patients. Glycemic control improved in 56.6% of patients with pre-diabetes/diabetes. Exposure time, pre-treatment GH and IGF-I levels were predictors of response. Tumor enlargement occurred in 6.5% and elevation of liver enzymes in 9.2%. PEGV was discontinued in 6 patients and 3 deaths unrelated to the drug were reported. Conclusions In a real-life scenario, PEGV is a highly effective and safe treatment for acromegaly patients not controlled with other therapies.

Pegvisomant in acromegaly: a multicenter real-life study in Argentina

ABSTRACT Objective To describe the long term safety and efficacy of pegvisomant (PEGV), and the predictors of treatment response in patients with acromegaly in the real life setting. Subjects and methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, hormonal and radiological data of acromegalic patients treated with PEGV in 17 Argentine centers. Results Seventy-five patients (age range 22-77, 51 females) with acromegaly have been treated with PEGV for up to 118 months (median 27 months). Before PEGV, 97.3% of patients had been treated with medical therapy, surgery and/or radiotherapy, two patients had no previous treatment. At that time, all patients had an IGF-1 above the upper normal limit (ULN) (mean 2.4 x ULN ± 0.98, range 1.25-7). At diagnosis of acromegaly 84% presented macroadenomas, prior to PEGV only 23,5% of patients remained with tumor remnant > 1 cm, the remaining showed normal or less than 1 cm images. Disease control (IGF-1 ≤ 1.2 x ULN) was achieved in 62.9% of patients with a mean dose of 11.8 mg/day. Thirty-four patients (45%) received PEGV monotherapy, while 41 (55%) received combined therapy with either somatostatin analogues and/or cabergoline. Adverse events related to PEGV were: local injection site reaction in 5.3%, elevated liver enzymes in 9.3%, and tumor size growth in 9.8%. Pre-PEGV IGF-I level was the only predictor of treatment response: 2.1 x ULN vs 2.8 x ULN in controlled and uncontrolled patients respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion this long term experience indicates PEGV treatment was highly effective and safe in our series of Argentine patients with acromegaly refractory to standard therapies. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2019;63(4):320-7