Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a digital technology-driven hierarchical healthcare screening pattern in China.

Utilization of digital technologies for cataract screening in primary care is a potential solution for addressing the dilemma between the growing aging population and unequally distributed resources. Here, we propose a digital technology-driven hierarchical screening (DH screening) pattern implemented in China to promote the equity and accessibility of healthcare. It consists of home-based mobile artificial intelligence (AI) screening, community-based AI diagnosis, and referral to hospitals. We utilize decision-analytic Markov models to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of different cataract screening strategies (no screening, telescreening, AI screening and DH screening). A simulated cohort of 100,000 individuals from age 50 is built through a total of 30 1-year Markov cycles. The primary outcomes are incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and incremental cost-utility ratio. The results show that DH screening dominates no screening, telescreening and AI screening in urban and rural China. Annual DH screening emerges as the most economically effective strategy with 341 (338 to 344) and 1326 (1312 to 1340) years of blindness avoided compared with telescreening, and 37 (35 to 39) and 140 (131 to 148) years compared with AI screening in urban and rural settings, respectively. The findings remain robust across all sensitivity analyses conducted. Here, we report that DH screening is cost-effective in urban and rural China, and the annual screening proves to be the most cost-effective option, providing an economic rationale for policymakers promoting public eye health in low- and middle-income countries.

Individual-level socioeconomic status and cataract-induced visual disability among older adults in China: the overview and urban-rural difference.

Objective: To investigate the prevalence of cataract-induced visual disability and its association with individual-level socioeconomic status (SES) among older adults in China. Methods: Using the data of 354,743 older adults (60 years and older) from the Second China National Sample Survey on Disability in 2006. Cross-sectional study design was applied. The differences in visual disability prevalence of cataracts among sociodemographic subgroups were analyzed by the chi-square test, and the association between individual-level SES and cataract-induced visual disability was investigated by the multivariate logistic regression model. Results: The weighted visual disability prevalence of cataracts was 4.84% in 2006. Older people with a higher household income per capita (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.81-0.85), higher education level (primary school vs. illiteracy: OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.76-0.83; ≥undergraduate college vs. illiteracy: OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.25-0.39), and occupation (OR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.50-0.56) were less likely to suffer from cataract-induced visual disability. Household income per capita and education level increase played a greater role in decreasing the risk of visual disability caused by cataracts in urban areas, while having occupation contributed more to reducing the risk of disability in rural areas. Conclusion: The gap in individual-level SES is closely related to the visual health inequities among older Chinese people and there are two distinct mechanisms in rural and urban areas. Strategies to promote collaborative healthcare development regionally, strengthen safeguards for disadvantaged groups, and increase public awareness of visual disability prevention are warranted.

A Canadian Cost-Utility Analysis of 2 Trabecular Microbypass Stents at Time of Cataract Surgery in Patients with Mild to Moderate Open-Angle Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To assess, from the Canadian public payer perspective, the cost-utility of implanting iStent Inject trabecular bypass stent (TBS) devices in conjunction with cataract surgery versus cataract surgery alone in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and visually significant cataract. DESIGN: Cost-utility analysis using efficacy and safety results of pivotal randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Modeled cohort of patients with OAG (83.1% with mild disease, 16.9% with moderate disease) and visually significant cataract. METHODS: Open-angle glaucoma treatment costs and effects were projected over a 15-year time horizon using a Markov model with Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson glaucoma stages (mild, moderate, advanced, severe or blind) and death as health states. Patients in the mild or moderate OAG health states received implantation of iStent Inject during cataract surgery versus cataract surgery alone. On worsening of visual field defect and optic disc damage, patients could receive selective laser trabeculoplasty and trabeculectomy. We measured treatment effect as reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) and mean medication use and estimated transition probabilities based on efficacy-adjusted visual field mean deviation decline per month. Healthcare resource utilization and utility scores were obtained from the literature. Cost inputs (2017 Canadian dollars [C$]) were derived using the Ontario Health Insurance Plan, expert opinion, medication claims datasets, and Ontario Drug Benefit Formulary medication consumption costs. We conducted deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to examine the impact of alternative model input values on results. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: Compared with cataract surgery alone, TBS plus cataract surgery showed a 99% probability of being more effective (+0.023 QALYs; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.004 to 0.044) and a 73.7% probability of being cost-saving (net cost, -C$389.00; 95% CI, -C$1712.00 to C$850.70). In 95% of all simulations, TBS plus cataract surgery showed a cost per QALY of C$62 366 or less. Results were robust in additional sensitivity and scenario analyses. CONCLUSIONS: iStent Inject TBS implantation during cataract surgery seems to be cost effective for reducing IOP in patients with mild to moderate OAG versus cataract surgery alone.

Comparative efficacy and cost-utility of combined cataract and minimally invasive glaucoma surgery in primary open-angle glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To assess the comparative efficacy and the long-term cost-utility of alternative minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGSs) when combined with cataract surgery in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: Treatment effects, as measured by the 1-year reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP), were estimated with an adjusted indirect treatment comparison. Evidence from randomized clinical trials was identified for four different MIGS methods. A disease-transition model was developed by capturing clinically relevant POAG stages and the expected natural disease evolution. Outcomes of the disease-transition model were the comparative utility [quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)], cost and cost-utility of included strategies in a lifetime horizon. RESULTS: Estimated 1-year IOP reductions were: cataract surgery - 2.05 mmHg (95% CI - 3.38; - 0.72), one trabecular micro-bypass stent - 3.15 mmHg (95% CI - 5.66; - 0.64), two trabecular micro-bypass stents - 4.85 mmHg (95% CI - 7.71; - 1.99) and intracanalicular scaffold - 2.25 mmHg (95% CI - 4.87; 0.37). Discounted outcomes from the disease-transition model appraised the strategy of two trabecular micro-bypass stents with cataract surgery in the moderate POAG stage as the one providing the greatest added value, with 10,955€ per additional QALY. Improved outcomes were seen when assessing MIGS in the moderate POAG stage. CONCLUSIONS: When indirectly comparing alternative MIGS methods combined with cataract surgery, the option of two trabecular micro-bypass stents showed both a superior efficacy and long-term cost-utility from a German perspective. Moreover, outcomes of the disease-transition model suggest POAG patients to beneficiate the most from an earlier intervention in the moderate stage contrary to waiting until an advanced disease is present.

Cost-Effectiveness of Preoperative OCT in Cataract Evaluation for Multifocal Intraocular Lens.

PURPOSE: To determine the cost effectiveness of an adjunctive screening OCT during the preoperative evaluation of a patient considering cataract surgery with a multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis. PARTICIPANTS: A 67-year-old man with 20/60 vision undergoing evaluation for first-eye cataract surgery. METHODS: The cost-effectiveness analysis of the reference patient undergoing a preoperative cataract examination with and without a screening OCT was performed, evaluating for vitreoretinal diseases including an epiretinal membrane, age-related macular degeneration, vitreomacular traction, and cystoid macular edema. It was assumed that patients with macular pathologies detected before surgery would receive a monofocal IOL and be referred to a retina specialist for evaluation and management. The Medicare reimbursable cost of an OCT was $41.81. All costs and benefits were adjusted for inflation to 2019 United States dollars and discounted 3% per annum over a 16-year time horizon. Probability sensitivity analyses and 1-way deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess for uncertainty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS: Approximately 20.5% of patients undergoing cataract surgery may have macular pathologies, of which 11% may not be detected on the initial clinical examination. In the base case, an adjunctive preoperative OCT was cost effective from a third-party payer and societal perspective in the United States. In the probability sensitivity analyses, the ICURs were within the societal willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000/QALY in approximately 64.4% of the clinical scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: A preoperative screening OCT during the evaluation of a patient considering a multifocal IOL added to the costs of the cataract surgery, but the OCT increased the detection of macular pathologies and improved the QALYs over time. An adjunctive screening OCT can be cost effective from a third-party payer and societal perspective.

The Impact of Sociodemographic and Socioeconomic Factors on the Burden of Cataract in Small Island Developing States (SIDS) in the Caribbean from 1990 to 2016.

Purpose: To study the impact of sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors on the cataract burden in Caribbean small island developing states (SIDS) using disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs).Methods: National and regional age and sex specific cataract DALY numbers and rates from 1990 to 2016 for Caribbean SIDS, were extracted from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The human development index (HDI), healthcare access and quality (HAQ) index, and the World Bank's classification of economies were used as socioeconomic status indicators. The Gini coefficient, Atkinson, Theil and concentration indices were used to measure health inequality. Paired Wilcoxon signed rank test, Pearson correlation, and linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors associated with differences in cataract burden.Results: Men had higher age-standardized DALY rates than women (P < .001) with median rates of 90.72 (Interquartile range [IQR], 87.8-94.2) and 83.94(IQR, 80.9-86.5), respectively. The burden of cataract increased with age. Upper-middle income countries had higher age-standardized DALY rates than high income countries (P < .001), with median rates of 90.1 (IQR, 86.8-93.4) and 79.8 (IQR, 77.5-81.8), respectively. Age-standardized DALY rates were inversely correlated with HDI (r = - 0.61, ß = - 51.56 [P < .05]) and HAQ (r = - 0.68, ß = - 0.46 [P < .01). Between-country inequality was negligible, and the burden of cataract is greater among the poor.Conclusion: Global trends of socioeconomic factors were confirmed. Significantly, men had higher age-standardized DALY rates than women. This is an area for further research.

Do independent treatment centers offer more value than general hospitals? The case of cataract care.

OBJECTIVE: To identify differences between independent treatment centers (ITCs) and general hospitals (GHs) regarding costs, quality of care, and efficiency. DATA SOURCES: Anonymous claims data (2013-2015) were used. We also obtained quality indicators from a semipublic platform. STUDY DESIGN: This study uses a comparative multilevel analysis, controlling for case mix, to evaluate the performance of ITCs and GHs for patients diagnosed with cataract. DATA COLLECTION: Reimbursement claims were extracted from existing claims databases of the largest Dutch health insurer. Quality indicators were obtained by external agencies through a mixed-mode survey. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: There are no stark differences in complexity of cases for cataract care. ITCs seem to perform surgeries more frequently per care pathway, but conduct a lower number of health care activities per surgical claim. Total average costs are lower in ITCs compared with GHs, but when adjusted for case mix, the differences in costs are lower. The findings with the adjusted quality differences suggest that ITCs outperform GHs on patient satisfaction, but patients' outcomes are similar. CONCLUSION: This finding supports the postulation-based on the focus factory theory-that ITCs can provide more value for cataract care than GHs.

Barriers, Costs, and Attitudes Toward Pediatric Cataract Surgery at Two Large Facilities in China and India.

PURPOSE: To better understand barriers of costs and attitudes toward pediatric cataract surgery in China and India. METHODS: From January 2014 to June 2015, families of children ≤ 10 years old about to undergo or having completed surgery for bilateral, non-traumatic cataract at two tertiary centers in China and India completed questionnaires regarding their demographic characteristics, financial status, living environment, health seeking behaviors, and medical burden. RESULTS: In China, 38 children (23 boys [60.5%], mean age 3.11 ± 2.88 years) were un-operated, and 44 (26 boys [59.1%], mean age 5.09 +/- 2.17 years) had undergone surgery, while in India there were 60 (44 boys [73.3%], mean age 4.61 +/- 3.32 years) and 39 (29 boys [74.4%], mean age 6.45 +/- 2.74 years) children respectively, 181 in total. Chinese children were younger at presentation (p ≤ 0.03 for both operated and un-operated) and also when cataract was detected (median [inter quartile range] 10 [3-34] versus 24 [6-60] months [p = 0.06] for un-operated, 5 [2-12] versus 36 [8-72] months [p < 0.001] for operated). Maternal education levels were lower in India (48.3% and 51.3% with elementary education only among un-operated [p = 0.11] and operated [p = 0.006] families in India versus 27.0% and 20.5% in China), as were rates of consulting medical practitioners for illness (44.7% and 36.4% for un-operated [p < 0.001] and operated [p = 0.001] in China versus 10% and 5.13% in India). CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic challenges to securing cataract surgery may be greater, and delays in obtaining surgery longer, in India compared to China, if these facilities are representative.

Trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis of toric versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract patients with bilateral corneal astigmatism in the Netherlands.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of toric versus monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in cataract patients with bilateral corneal astigmatism. SETTING: Two ophthalmology clinics in the Netherlands. DESIGN: Prospective cost-effectiveness analysis. METHODS: Resource-use data were collected over a 6-month postoperative period. Consecutive patients with bilateral age-related cataract and 1.25 diopters or more of corneal astigmatism were included in the economic evaluation. Patients were randomized to phacoemulsification with bilateral toric or monofocal IOL implantation. All relevant resources were included in the cost analysis. The base-case analysis was performed from a societal perspective based on quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The main outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. RESULTS: The analysis comprised 77 consecutive patients (33 toric IOL; 44 monofocal IOL). Societal costs were higher in the toric IOL group (€3203 [$3864]) than in the monofocal IOL group (€2796 [US$3373]). QALYs were slightly lower in the toric IOL group (0.30 versus 0.31; P = .75). Toric IOLs were therefore inferior to monofocal IOLs from a cost-effectiveness perspective. The cost-effectiveness probability ranged from 1% to 15%, assuming a ceiling ratio for the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €2500 to €20 000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: From a societal perspective, bilateral toric IOL implantation in cataract patients with corneal astigmatism was not cost-effective compared with monofocal IOL implantation. Copayment by patients should therefore be considered.

A discrete event simulation model to evaluate the treatment pathways of patients with cataract in the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND: The number of people affected by cataract in the United Kingdom (UK) is growing rapidly due to ageing population. As the only way to treat cataract is through surgery, there is a high demand for this type of surgery and figures indicate that it is the most performed type of surgery in the UK. The National Health Service (NHS), which provides free of charge care in the UK, is under huge financial pressure due to budget austerity in the last decade. As the number of people affected by the disease is expected to grow significantly in coming years, the aim of this study is to evaluate whether the introduction of new processes and medical technologies will enable cataract services to cope with the demand within the NHS funding constraints. METHODS: We developed a Discrete Event Simulation model representing the cataract services pathways at Leicester Royal Infirmary Hospital. The model was inputted with data from national and local sources as well as from a surgery demand forecasting model developed in the study. The model was verified and validated with the participation of the cataract services clinical and management teams. RESULTS: Four scenarios involving increased number of surgeries per half-day surgery theatre slot were simulated. Results indicate that the total number of surgeries per year could be increased by 40% at no extra cost. However, the rate of improvement decreases for increased number of surgeries per half-day surgery theatre slot due to a higher number of cancelled surgeries. Productivity is expected to improve as the total number of doctors and nurses hours will increase by 5 and 12% respectively. However, non-human resources such as pre-surgery rooms and post-surgery recovery chairs are under-utilized across all scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: Using new processes and medical technologies for cataract surgery is a promising way to deal with the expected higher demand especially as this could be achieved with limited impact on costs. Non-human resources capacity need to be evenly levelled across the surgery pathway to improve their utilisation. The performance of cataract services could be improved by better communication with and proactive management of patients.

Willingness to pay for cataract surgery is much lower than actual costs in Zamfara state, northern Nigeria.

PURPOSE: Direct medical and non-medical costs incurred by those undergoing subsidised cataract surgery at Gusau eye clinic, Zamfara state, were recently determined. The aim of this study was to assess the willingness to pay for cataract surgery among adults with severe visual impairment or blindness from cataract in rural Zamfara and to compare this to actual costs. METHODS: In three rural villages served by Gusau eye clinic, key informants helped identify 80 adults with bilateral severe visual impairment or blindness (<6/60), with cataract being the cause in at least one eye. The median amount participants were willing to pay for cataract surgery was determined. The proportion willing to pay actual costs of the (i) subsidised surgical fee (US$18.5), (ii) average non-medical expenses (US$25.2), and (iii) average total expenses (US$51.2) at Gusau eye clinic were calculated. Where participants would seek funds for surgery was determined. RESULTS: Among 80 participants (38% women), most (n = 73, 91%) were willing to pay something, ranging from

[Cost of teaching cataract surgery in a public hospital]. / Évaluation du coût de l'enseignement de la chirurgie de la cataracte dans un établissement public de santé.

INTRODUCTION: The gold standard of cataract surgery, phacoemulsification is the most commonly performed surgical procedure in France. Surgical instruction often takes place in the operating room where residents and fellows perform real surgery, supervised by an experienced surgeon. The goals of this study were double: evaluate surgical times according to the person performing the surgery, in order to quantitate the cost incurred by teaching and compare complication rate between surgeons. METHODS: A retrospective single center study was performed at Simone-Veil Hospital, Eaubonne-Montmorency, France. Over a period of 13 consecutive weeks from January to March 2016, all patients who underwent phacoemulsification for cataract extraction were included. Patients were separated into three groups, according to the primary surgeon: group S for Senior was composed of two experienced surgeons who typically performed over 500 procedures per year; group A for assistant was composed of three residents who performed less than 500 procedures per year; 2 inexperienced interns constituted group I. Surgery duration was recorded by the OR nurse in minutes between the first incision and removal of the lid speculum. The cost of operating room time was estimated at seven euros per minute. The occurrence of complications was determined from the operative report. RESULTS: 408 cataract surgeries were performed during the study period, divided into 156 eyes in group S, 142 in group A and 110 surgeries in group I. The mean age at surgery was 74.1±9 years (39-95), comparable in the 3 groups. The operative time was significantly shorter in group S (11.7min) than in A (18.7min; P<0.001) and in I (18.8min; P<0.001). The complication rate was higher in group I than in group S (P=0.03). The average additional cost related to the lengthening of the teaching procedure was 49 euros for Group A and 49.7 euros for Group I. DISCUSSION: The hospital reimbursement for cataract surgery is higher in the public sector than in the private sector; it can absorb the cost of university training. CONCLUSION: Teaching cataract surgery entails an additional financial cost for the hospital. It is also responsible for a higher human cost due to a greater number of operative complications with interns.

Effective cataract surgical coverage: An indicator for measuring quality-of-care in the context of Universal Health Coverage.

OBJECTIVE: To define and demonstrate effective cataract surgical coverage (eCSC), a candidate UHC indicator that combines a coverage measure (cataract surgical coverage, CSC) with quality (post-operative visual outcome). METHODS: All Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness (RAAB) surveys with datasets on the online RAAB Repository on April 1 2016 were downloaded. The most recent study from each country was included. By country, cataract surgical outcome (CSOGood, 6/18 or better; CSOPoor, worse than 6/60), CSC (operated cataract as a proportion of operable plus operated cataract) and eCSC (operated cataract and a good outcome as a proportion of operable plus operated cataract) were calculated. The association between CSC and CSO was assessed by linear regression. Gender inequality in CSC and eCSC was calculated. FINDINGS: Datasets from 20 countries were included (2005-2013; 67,337 participants; 5,474 cataract surgeries). Median CSC was 53.7% (inter-quartile range[IQR] 46.1-66.6%), CSOGood was 58.9% (IQR 53.7-67.6%) and CSOPoor was 17.7% (IQR 11.3-21.1%). Coverage and quality of cataract surgery were moderately associated-every 1% CSC increase was associated with a 0.46% CSOGood increase and 0.28% CSOPoor decrease. Median eCSC was 36.7% (IQR 30.2-50.6%), approximately one-third lower than the median CSC. Women tended to fare worse than men, and gender inequality was slightly higher for eCSC (4.6% IQR 0.5-7.1%) than for CSC (median 2.3% IQR -1.5-11.6%). CONCLUSION: eCSC allows monitoring of quality in conjunction with coverage of cataract surgery. In the surveys analysed, on average 36.7% of people who could benefit from cataract surgery had undergone surgery and obtained a good visual outcome.

The high cost of cataracts.

A report from the Royal National Institute of Blind People (RNIB) has revealed that in some parts of the UK, patients with sight loss wait up to 15 months for cataract surgery, increasing their risk of falls, social isolation and depression.

Availability of evidence on cataract in low/middle-income settings: a review of reviews using evidence gap maps approach.

BACKGROUND: Despite high-quality evidence being essential for planning and delivering eye health programmes, evidence on what works is relatively scarce. To address this need, we developed eye health Evidence Gap Maps (EGMs) with the first one focusing on cataract. These maps summarise, critically appraise and present evidence in a user-friendly format. This paper presents experiences of developing the cataract gap map and discusses the challenges and benefits of the process. METHODS: Following a comprehensive search of relevant databases, we sifted and extracted data from all relevant reviews on cataract. Critical appraisal was conducted by two reviewers independently using Supported the Use of Research Evidence checklist and a summary quality assessment was shared with the authors for comments. RESULTS: A total of 52 reviews were included in the map. The majority of the reviews addressed quality of clinical care (20) and types of treatment (18). Overall, 30 reviews provided strong evidence in response to the research question, 14 reviews showed weak or no evidence and in 14 reviews the results were inconclusive. 14 reviews were regarded as high quality, 12 were medium quality and 26 were graded as low quality. To verify the validity of the Supporting the Use for Research Evidence (SURE) checklist, studies were also appraised using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) tool. Based on the κ statistics test, results showed excellent agreement between the two checklists (K=0.79). DISCUSSION: EGMs support policy makers and programme managers to make informed decisions and enable researchers to prioritise future work based on the most evident gaps on knowledge.

Inequity in waiting for cataract surgery--an analysis of data from the Swedish National Cataract Register.

BACKGROUND: Swedish Health and Medical Services act states that good care should be given to the entire population on equal terms. Still studies show that access to care in Sweden differ related to for example gender and socioeconomic variables. One of the areas in Swedish health care that has attracted attention for potential inequity in access is Cataract Extraction (CE). Previous studies of access to CE in Sweden show that female patients have in general poorer vision before they are operated and longer waiting times for CE than male patients. The aim of the study was to describe the waiting times in different patient groups with regards to visual acuity, gender, age, native country, educational level, annual income and whether the patient was retired or still working. METHODS: The study was designed as a register study of 102 532 patients who have had CE performed in Sweden 2010-2011. Linear regression was used to analyse the association between patient characteristics and waiting times. Mean waiting times for women and men were calculated for all groups. RESULTS: At significance level p < 0.05 longer waiting times corresponded to patients having good visual acuity, being of female gender, high age, retired, born outside the Nordic countries and having low income and education. Calculations of mean waiting times for all groups showed that women had longer waiting times than men. CONCLUSIONS: The differences between groups defined, for example, by gender, age, native country, income, education and retirement are statistically significant. We do not consider them as clinically significant, but we consider the consistent pattern that we have found noteworthy in relation to the principle of equity in health care.

Cost-Utility Analyses of Cataract Surgery in Advanced Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: To explore the cost-utility of cataract surgery in patients with advanced age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed as having and treated for age-related cataract and with a history of advanced AMD at the Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, were included in the study. All of the participants underwent successful phacoemulsification with foldable posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation under retrobulbar anesthesia. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and utility value elicited by time trade-off method from patients at 3-month postoperative time were compared with those before surgery. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained in a lifetime were calculated at a 3% annual discounted rate. Costs per QALY gained were calculated using the bootstrap method, and probabilities of being cost-effective were presented using a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results. RESULTS: Mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution BCVA in the operated eye increased from 1.37 ± 0.5 (Snellen, 20/469) to 0.98 ± 0.25 (Snellen, 20/191) (p < 0.001); BCVA in the weighted average from both eyes (=75% better eye + 25% worse eye) was changed from 1.13 ± 0.22 (Snellen, 20/270) to 0.96 ± 0.17 (Snellen, 20/182) (p < 0.001). Utility values from both patients and doctors increased significantly after surgery (p < 0.001 and p = 0.007). Patients gained 1.17 QALYs by cataract surgery in their lifetime. The cost per QALY was 8835 Chinese yuan (CNY) (1400 U.S. dollars [USD]). It is cost-effective at the threshold of 115,062 CNY (18,235 USD) per QALY in China recommended by the World Health Organization. The cost per QALY varied from 7045 CNY (1116 USD) to 94,178 CNY (14,925 USD) in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Visual acuity and quality of life assessed by utility value improved significantly after surgery. Cataract surgery was a cost-effective intervention for patients with coexistent AMD.

The economics of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Femtosecond lasers for use during cataract surgery carry significant purchase and use costs. The aim of this article is to help surgeons and surgery centers anticipate financial issues related to implementing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS). Such scenarios hopefully can help to inform decision making around the purchase and use of these lasers. RECENT FINDINGS: FLACS has several potential advantages over traditional phacoemulsification. However, although studies have demonstrated noninferiority of FLACS, there continues to be few data to support significantly improved visual outcomes. The literature does show a significantly higher cost for FLACS. As this cost can be passed on to patients under Medicare rules, there is the potential for increased physician revenue, which can be a motivator for adoption of this new technology. The magnitude of this increase is heavily influenced by the financial details of the implementation, like the cost of the laser, the volume of surgery performed, and the incremental increase in revenue. SUMMARY: A financial analysis should be performed prior to purchasing a femtosecond laser. This analysis can help predict if FLACS is going to be a financial windfall or a money loser.