RESUMO
Cephalexin, a first-generation cephalosporin, is the first-line oral therapy for children with musculoskeletal infections due to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). Cefadroxil, a similar first-generation cephalosporin, is an attractive alternative to cephalexin given its longer half-life. In this study, we describe the comparative pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of cephalexin and cefadroxil in children with musculoskeletal infections. Children aged 6 months to 18 years with a musculoskeletal infection were enrolled in a prospective, open-label, crossover PK study and given single oral doses of cefadroxil (50-75 mg/kg up to 2,000 mg) and cephalexin (50 mg/kg up to 1,375 mg). Population PK models were developed and used for dosing simulations. Our primary PD target was the achievement of free antibiotic concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT >MIC) for 40% of the day for MICs ≤ 4 mg/L. PK of cephalexin (n = 15) and cefadroxil (n = 14) were best described using a one-compartment, first-order absorption model, with a lag time component for cefadroxil. PK parameters were notable for cefadroxil's longer half-life (1.61 h) than cephalexin's (1.10 h). For pediatric weight bands, our primary PD target was achieved by cephalexin 25 mg/kg/dose, maximum 750 mg/dose, administered three times daily and cefadroxil 40 mg/kg/dose, maximum 1,500 mg/dose, administered twice daily. More aggressive dosing was required to achieve higher PD targets. Among children with musculoskeletal infections, oral cephalexin and cefadroxil achieved PD targets for efficacy against MSSA. Given less frequent dosing, twice-daily cefadroxil should be further considered as an alternative to cephalexin for oral step-down therapy for serious infections due to MSSA.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Cefadroxila , Cefalexina , Estudos Cross-Over , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Cefalexina/farmacocinética , Cefalexina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Criança , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Cefadroxila/farmacocinética , Cefadroxila/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Masculino , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Lactente , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Cefdinir and cephalexin are cephalosporin antibiotics commonly used in the treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Their efficacy depends on achieving sufficient time with concentrations exceeding the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Despite being frequently prescribed for UTIs, cefdinir has markedly lower urine penetration compared to cephalexin. It is possible that differences in pharmacokinetics could result in dissimilar efficacy between these agents; however, comparative studies of cephalosporins in UTIs are lacking. METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative study of patients discharged from emergency departments within a community health system with a diagnosis of acute cystitis who were prescribed cefdinir or cephalexin. Treatment failure rates at 7 and 14 days were compared between the 2 agents using a χ2 or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. RESULTS: There were no differences in overall treatment failure between the cefdinir and cephalexin groups. Treatment failure at 7 days occurred in 11.6% (n = 14) of patients in the cefdinir group and 8.3% (n = 10) of patients in the cephalexin group (P = 0.389). Treatment failure at 14 days was higher for cefdinir at 20.7% (n = 25) than for cephalexin at 11.8% (n = 14), but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.053). There were no differences in the rate of treatment failure in subgroup analyses of uncomplicated or complicated UTIs. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that cefdinir and cephalexin have comparable efficacy for the treatment of lower UTIs. While there was a numerically higher rate of treatment failure with cefdinir, there were no significant differences in treatment failure between the agents.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Cefdinir , Cefalexina , Infecções Urinárias , Cefalexina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Feminino , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Idoso , Adulto , Falha de Tratamento , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Urinary tract infection in pregnancy is a common microbial infection. Antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens is becoming a major health problem worldwide. The antimicrobial agents used to manage urinary tract infections during pregnancy should be carefully chosen. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the bacterial profile, antibiotic susceptibility pattern, and factors associated with urinary tract infection among pregnant women at Hosanna town public health facilities. A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from March to August 2022 on a total of 312 pregnant women who attended antenatal care at Hosanna Town public health facilities. Sociodemographic, clinical data, and related information were collected by using a pre-tested questionnaire. In addition, mid-stream urine specimens were collected from study participants. Bacterial pathogens were identified by standard bacteriological techniques. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by using the Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method. The data were analyzed by using SPSS version 25. Chi-square and odds ratios were calculated and a P-value≤0.05 at a 95% confidence interval was considered statistically significant. The results were presented with words and tables. Of a total of pregnant women, 59/312(18.9%) (95% CI: 14.7-23.7) were found to have significant bacteriuria. The predominant isolates were Escherichia coli (E. coli) 22(34.4%), followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) 10(15.6%), Staphylococci aureus (S. aureus) 7(10.9%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) 6(9.4%). Overall, 78.1% of these isolates were multidrug-resistant (MDR). Gram-negative bacteria were susceptible to meropenem (97.6%), gentamicin (85.7%), nitrofurantoin (82.1%), ciprofloxacin (73.8%), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (73.8%) and ceftriaxone (71.8%), but highly resistant to ampicillin (95.5%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (74.4%), doxycycline (71.8%), cefuroxime (69.2%), and cephalexin (69.2%). The gram-positive bacteria were susceptible to gentamicin (86.4%), erythromycin (81.8%), and nitrofurantoin (77.3%): whereas they showed a high level of resistance to penicillin (72.7%), doxycycline (54.5%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (52.9%), and cefoxitin (52.9%). No formal education for the participant (AOR: 2.86, 95% CI: 1.03-7.98, p=0.044), family monthly income <1500 birr (AOR: 3.19, 95% CI: 1.48-6.89, p=0.003), and previous history of UTI (AOR: 4.52, 95% CI: 2.04-10.03, p=0.001) were significantly associated with bacteriuria. This study revealed a high prevalence of bacterial urinary tract infection among pregnant women and low susceptibility to ampicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, cefuroxime, and cephalexin. Therefore, regularly, culture-based bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing should be performed. Alternatively, empiric antibiotic therapy should consider the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant uropathogens and the factor that may increase the urinary tract infection occurrence due to multi-drug resistant uropathogens.
Assuntos
Bacteriúria , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Infecções Urinárias , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriúria/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriúria/epidemiologia , Bacteriúria/microbiologia , Nitrofurantoína/uso terapêutico , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/uso terapêutico , Gestantes , Escherichia coli , Staphylococcus aureus , Cefuroxima/uso terapêutico , Doxiciclina/uso terapêutico , Etiópia/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Bactérias , Ampicilina/uso terapêutico , Gentamicinas/uso terapêutico , Cefalexina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of cephalexin on the fracture union histomorphometrically, radiologically, biomechanically, immunohistochemically, and histopathologically in a rat femur fracture model and to evaluate the effects of the antibiotics to be used in the prophylaxis of fracture infection on the union of the fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 male Wistar rats were divided into four groups as two-week control (C2) and cephalexin (CEP2) and four-week control (C4) and cephalexin (CEP4). After establishment of standard fracture model on right femurs, 60 mg/kg/day of cephalexin was applied to CEP2 and CEP4 by oral gavage. Radiological, biomechanical, histopathological, immunohistochemical, and histomorphometric examinations were performed on amputated femurs. RESULTS: Callus volume of CEP4 group significantly increased compared to CEP2 group (p=0.005), while no significant difference was found in the bone mineral density and callus/bone volume among the groups (p>0.05). There was no significant difference in flexural strength between the C4 and CEP4 groups (p=0.093). Histological healing scores increased from Week 2 to Week 4 (p=0.002) and inflammation scores decreased in both control and cephalexin groups (p=0.010 and p=0.008); however, no significant difference was found in healing and inflammation scores (p>0.05). The CD34+ immunoreactivity in the CEP2 group was significantly higher than the C2 group (p=0.029). Collagen type III level was significantly lower in the CEP2 and CEP4 groups compared to the corresponding control groups (p=0.008 and p=0.016, respectively). CONCLUSION: Cephalexin did not exert any radiological, histopathological, histomorphometric, biomechanical, and immunohistochemical adverse effects on the femoral fracture healing model in rats; however, it showed positive effects on CD34 and Collagen type III levels. Based on these findings, antibiotherapy with cephalexin may be considered as a safe treatment for fracture union.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Fêmur , Consolidação da Fratura , Ratos , Masculino , Animais , Ratos Wistar , Cefalexina/farmacologia , Cefalexina/uso terapêutico , Colágeno Tipo III , Fraturas do Fêmur/tratamento farmacológico , Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) is the most common causative microorganism of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis (PVO). Although oral antimicrobial therapy with first-generation cephalosporins can treat MSSA infection, data on PVO are scarce. This study evaluated the treatment efficacy of cephalexin as oral antibiotic therapy for MSSA-induced PVO. METHODS: This retrospective study included adult patients treated with oral cephalexin as the completing treatment for PVO with MSSA bacteremia from 2012 to 2020. Treatment effectiveness of cephalexin was evaluated by comparing improvement (5-point scale; score ≥ 4/5 indicates treatment success) in symptoms and laboratory and imaging results between intravenous antimicrobial and oral cephalexin treatment. RESULTS: Among 15 participants (8 [53%] women; median [interquartile range, IQR], age 75 [67.5-80.5] years; Charlson Comorbidity Index 2 [0-4]), 10 (67%) had lumbar spine lesions, 12 (80%) had spinal abscesses, and 4 (27%) had remote abscesses; no patients had concomitant endocarditis. In 11 patients with normal renal function, cephalexin 1,500-2,000 mg/day was administered. Five patients (33%) underwent surgery. Median (IQR; range) duration (days) of intravenous antibiotics, cephalexin, and total treatment was 36 (32-61; 21-86), 29 (19-82; 8-251), and 86 (59-125; 37-337), respectively. Cephalexin had an 87% treatment success rate without recurrence during a median follow-up of 119 (IQR, 48.5-350) days. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MSSA bacteremia and PVO, antibiotic treatment completion with cephalexin is a reasonable option, even in cases with spinal abscess, if at least 3 weeks of effective intravenous antimicrobial therapy is provided.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Osteomielite , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Idoso , Masculino , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cefalexina/uso terapêutico , Meticilina/farmacologia , Staphylococcus aureus , Abscesso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Osteomielite/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Recent evidence has shown that oral antibiotic therapy is not inferior to IV antibiotic therapy in the treatment of complicated Staphylococcus aureus infections. Therefore, oral antibiotic therapy is now frequently prescribed in clinical practice due to cost benefit, ease of administration, decreased complication rate, and lack of need for IV access. In vitro susceptibility testing for ß-lactam oral antibiotics is not routinely performed as the guidelines provided by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommend using oxacillin and cefoxitin as surrogate markers. Hence, oral antibiotic susceptibilities for cephalexin and dicloxacillin are not reported and implied based on oxacillin and cefoxitin. The objective of the current study was to determine whether susceptibilities among S. aureus isolates are predictable when comparing commonly used IV and oral beta-lactams. METHODS: Cefazolin, cephalexin, dicloxacillin, and oxacillin broth microdilution minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for 100 clinical isolates of methicillin-sensitive S. aureus by broth microdilution following CLSI guidelines. RESULTS: Among these isolates, median MICs for cephalexin were eight-fold higher than cefazolin MICs and median MICs for dicloxacillin were four-fold less than oxacillin MICs. Ten percent of more strains studied had a major or very major error in its susceptibility reporting when cephalexin was compared to its surrogate marker oxacillin. DISCUSSIONS/CONCLUSIONS: The variations in MICs observed compounded with the dosing and pharmacokinetic differences of oral versus IV ß-lactam suggests that establishing breakpoints for oral ß-lactam antibiotics is necessary to ensure adequate therapy is selected for the treatment of complex S. aureus infections.
Assuntos
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Cefoxitina/farmacologia , Cefoxitina/uso terapêutico , beta-Lactamas/farmacologia , beta-Lactamas/uso terapêutico , Cefazolina/farmacologia , Cefazolina/uso terapêutico , Staphylococcus aureus , Dicloxacilina/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Oxacilina/farmacologia , Oxacilina/uso terapêutico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Cefalexina/farmacologia , Cefalexina/uso terapêutico , Monobactamas/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
The 2011 Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) recommend non-ß-lactam antibiotics for empiric therapy. However, increasing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. resistance to first-line antibiotic therapies has necessitated the need for alternative agents. Based on local antibiogram data, cephalexin has become the preferred oral antibiotic for empiric treatment of UTIs at our institution. The purpose of this single-center retrospective review was to assess clinical outcomes of patients discharged from the emergency department (ED) who received cephalexin for the treatment of uncomplicated UTIs. The primary outcome of this study was to assess the proportion of patients with clinical success 30 days after discharge from the ED. Patients were excluded if they were <18 years of age, received ≥10 days of cephalexin, received antibiotics for any indication other than uncomplicated UTI, received antibiotics within 60 days of their ED visit, or had structural abnormalities. A total of 264 patients were included for evaluation, and 214 patients (81.1%) met the criteria for clinical success. Overall, 28 (10.6%) patients required a change in antibiotics based on cultures and sensitivities, 18 (6.8%) patients returned for nonresolving or worsening symptoms, and 4 (1.5%) patients required both a change in antibiotics and returned for nonresolving or worsening symptoms. Short courses of twice-daily cephalexin appear to be a safe and effective option for the empiric treatment of uncomplicated UTIs.
Assuntos
Infecções por Escherichia coli , Infecções Urinárias , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Cefalexina/uso terapêutico , beta-Lactamas/uso terapêutico , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Escherichia coli/tratamento farmacológico , Escherichia coli , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
This retrospective single-center study included children aged 2 months to 18 years who were prescribed an oral antibiotic for microbiologically confirmed urinary tract infection (UTI). The primary outcomes were re-encounter to the hospital, emergency department, or urgent care within 30 days and modification of the antibiotic regimen within 14 days. Development of Clostridioides difficile (C difficile) infection or new allergic reaction to the antibiotic prescribed was the secondary outcome. The sample included 2685 children. Rates of re-encounter were similar regardless of the initial antibiotic prescribed (P = .88), and patients who received cefdinir had a lower rate of medication changes (5%) compared with both cephalexin (14%) and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (15%) (P ≤ .001). The most common reason for medication change was susceptibility interpretation. Given its low side-effect profile and narrow spectrum compared with the alternatives, cephalexin appears to be a reasonable choice as first-line therapy for the treatment of uncomplicated pediatric UTI.
Assuntos
Cefalexina , Infecções Urinárias , Criança , Humanos , Cefalexina/uso terapêutico , Cefdinir/uso terapêutico , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/uso terapêutico , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cesarean section (CS) is the most frequently performed surgery in the United States. Compared to vaginal delivery, CS has a higher risk of maternal and neonatal mortality, morbidities, and complications, among which surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common. We aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of postoperative oral administration of cephalexin and metronidazole on SSI among obese women undergoing CS. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing the prophylactic effect of oral cephalexin and metronidazole vs cephalexin and placebo on SSI following CS among obese women. who had received preoperative prophylactic cephalosporin antibiotics. The study was conducted at the Ommolbanin Hospital, affiliated with Mashhad University of Medical Sciences from April 2019 to February 2020. RESULT: The participants were randomized into the intervention group (n = 210) and the control group (n = 210). At week-1 follow-up, the outcomes were significantly lower in the intervention group as compared to the control group in terms of fever (9% vs 19%, p = 0.003), abnormal discharge from the incision (serous: 8.6% vs 10.5%, purulent: 2.9% vs 16.7%, p < 0.001), incision separation (1% vs 7.1%, p = 0.001), and cellulitis (4.8% vs 13.3%, p = 0.002). At week-2 follow-up, there were no patients in the intervention group with fever, abnormal discharge from the incision, incision separation, or cellulitis and there was a statistically significant difference for fever, abnormal discharge from the incision, and incision separation between the two groups (p < 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.014, respectively). CONCLUSION: Post-operative administration of cephalexin and metronidazole for 48-h post-cesarean delivery among obese women, in addition to the standard pre-operative prophylaxis, reduced the overall rate of surgical site infection and wound infection symptoms in a 2-week follow-up. Trial registration The study protocol was approved by the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCTID: IRCT20200608047685N2) on 2021-03-15.
Assuntos
Cefalexina , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Recém-Nascido , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/tratamento farmacológico , Cefalexina/uso terapêutico , Metronidazol/uso terapêutico , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Celulite (Flegmão)/tratamento farmacológico , Irã (Geográfico) , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/cirurgiaRESUMO
Selection of an antibiotic and dosing regimen requires consideration of multiple factors including microbiological data, site of infection, pharmacokinetics, and how it relates to the pharmacodynamic target. Given the multiple dosage regimens of amoxicillin with/without clavulanate and cephalexin, we review the principles of dose selection from a pharmacist's perspective.
Assuntos
Amoxicilina , Cefalexina , Criança , Humanos , Cefalexina/uso terapêutico , Farmacêuticos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Combinação Amoxicilina e Clavulanato de Potássio/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos , Ácido Clavulânico/farmacocinéticaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines suggest adjuvant antibiotics after incision and drainage (I&D) of small, uncomplicated abscesses may improve patient outcomes, minimize pain, and prevent recurrence. The objective was to explore antibiotic prescribing at ED discharge and describe patient outcomes. METHODS: This was a health records review of adult patients (≥ 18 years) discharged from an academic hospital ED (annual census 65,000) over a 2-year period with diagnosis of an uncomplicated skin abscess. Outcomes included any unplanned return ED visits within 30 days, repeat I&D, and escalation to intravenous (IV) antibiotics. RESULTS: Of 389 ED visits, 85.6% patients underwent I&D, of which 62.2% were prescribed antibiotics at discharge. Of these patients, 36.7% received guideline recommended antibiotics (TMP-SMX or clindamycin). Of all patients who underwent I&D, 13.2% had an unplanned return ED visit within 30 days, 6.9% required repeat I&D, and 0.6% patients were escalated to IV antibiotics. Patients treated with cefalexin were more likely to have an unplanned return ED visit within 30 days (20.0 vs 5.3%; Δ14.7, 95% CI 4.6-24.4), and were more likely to have a repeat I&D within 30 days (13.7 vs 0%; Δ13.7, 95% CI 6.4-22.0), compared to patients prescribed guideline recommended antibiotics. Treatment with guideline recommended antibiotics reduced treatment failure significantly in MRSA positive patients (0.0 vs 44.4%; Δ44.4, 95% CI 13.4-73.3). CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotics were prescribed for most abscesses that underwent I&D. Less than half of the patients received antibiotics that were guideline recommended. Compared to those who received cefalexin, patients prescribed TMP-SMX or clindamycin had fewer return ED visits and were less likely to have a repeat I&D within 30 days. However, adjuvant antibiotic use did not significantly improve outcomes overall, with most patients not requiring a change in management irrespective of antibiotic use.
RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Les lignes directrices actuelles suggèrent que les adjuvants aux antibiotiques après l'incision et le drainage (I&D) des petits abcès simples peuvent améliorer les résultats pour les patients, réduire la douleur et prévenir la récidive. L'objectif était d'explorer la prescription d'antibiotiques à la sortie des urgences et de décrire les résultats pour les patients. MéTHODES: Il s'agissait d'une étude des dossiers médicaux des patients adultes (≥ 18 ans) sortis des urgences d'un hôpital universitaire (recensement annuel 65 000) sur une période de deux ans avec un diagnostic d'abcès cutané non compliqué. Les résultats comprenaient toutes les visites de retour non planifiées aux urgences dans les 30 jours, la répétition de l'I&D et l'escalade vers des antibiotiques intraveineux (IV). RéSULTATS: Sur 389 visites aux urgences, 85,6 % des patients ont subi une I&D, dont 62,2 % se sont vu prescrire des antibiotiques à la sortie. Parmi ces patients, 36,7 % ont reçu les antibiotiques recommandés par les directives (TMP-SMX ou clindamycine). Sur l'ensemble des patients ayant subi une I&D, 13,2 % ont eu une visite non planifiée aux urgences dans les 30 jours, 6,9 % ont dû subir une nouvelle I&D et 0,6 % des patients ont eu recours à une antibiothérapie IV. Les patients traités par la céfalexine étaient plus susceptibles d'avoir une visite de retour imprévue à l'urgence dans les 30 jours 20,0 % vs 5,3 % ; Δ14,7, IC 95 % : 4,6 à 24,4), et étaient plus susceptibles d'avoir une I&D répétée dans les 30 jours (13,7 % vs 0 % ; Δ13,7, IC 95 % : 6,4 à 22,0), par rapport aux patients auxquels on a prescrit des antibiotiques recommandés par les lignes directrices. Le traitement avec les antibiotiques recommandés par les lignes directrices a réduit de manière significative l'échec thérapeutique chez les patients positifs au SARM (0,0 % vs 44,4 % ; Δ44,4, IC 95 % : 13,4 à 73,3). CONCLUSIONS: Des antibiotiques ont été prescrits pour la plupart des abcès ayant fait l'objet d'une I&D. Moins de la moitié des patients ont reçu des antibiotiques recommandés par les lignes directrices. Par rapport à ceux qui ont reçu de la céfalexine, les patients à qui l'on a prescrit du TMP-SMX ou de la clindamycine ont eu moins de visites de retour aux urgences et étaient moins susceptibles de subir une nouvelle I&D dans les 30 jours. Toutefois, l'utilisation des adjuvants aux antibiotiques n'a pas amélioré de façon significative les résultats dans l'ensemble, la plupart des patients n'ayant pas besoin d'un changement de prise en charge, quelle que soit l'utilisation d'antibiotiques.
Assuntos
Infecções dos Tecidos Moles , Adulto , Humanos , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Clindamicina/uso terapêutico , Abscesso/tratamento farmacológico , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Cefalexina/uso terapêutico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) seen in the emergency department are commonly treated as an outpatient with oral antibiotics. Given that antibiotics are available for over-the-counter purchase in Mexico, there is speculation that potential misuse and overuse of antibiotics in United States-Mexico border areas could lead to antibiotic resistance patterns that would render some empiric treatments for UTIs less effective. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) guideline-recommended antibiotics for treatment of outpatient UTI diagnosed in the emergency department. Data were collected from a county hospital on the U.S.-Mexico border with a metropolitan area of over 2 million people. Secondary analysis included frequency of urine culture isolated, resistance rates of urine pathogens, and prescriber habits. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review of adult patients diagnosed and treated for UTI from August 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020. Culture results of included patients were analyzed against in vitro-tested antibiotics. Bacterial isolate frequency, resistance rates, and prescribing habits were collected. RESULTS: A total of 985 patient charts were reviewed, of which 520 patients met inclusion criteria for analysis of prescribing habits. Of these, 329 positive bacterial culture growths were included in the analysis of antibiotic resistance rates. Oral antibiotics with comparatively lower resistance rates were amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefdinir, cefuroxime, and nitrofurantoin. Oral antibiotics with notably high resistance rates included trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and cephalexin. Nitrofurantoin was prescribed most frequently for outpatient treatment of UTI/cystitis (41.6%) while cephalexin was the most commonly prescribed antibiotic for outpatient treatment of pyelonephritis (50%). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that, while part of standard IDSA guidelines, fluoroquinolones and TMP-SMX are not ideal empiric antibiotics for treatment of outpatient UTI in the U.S.-Mexico border region studied due to high resistance rates. Although not listed as first line agents per current IDSA recommendations, 2nd and 3rd generation cephalosporins, and amoxicillin/clavulanate would be acceptable options given resistance patterns demonstrated in accordance with IDSA allowance for tailoring selection to local resistance. Nitrofurantoin appears to be consistent with recommendations and demonstrates a favorable resistance profile for treatment of outpatient UTI within this region.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Infecções Urinárias , Humanos , Adulto , Estados Unidos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol , Levofloxacino , Nitrofurantoína , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cefuroxima , Cefdinir , México , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia , Combinação Amoxicilina e Clavulanato de Potássio , Fluoroquinolonas , Ciprofloxacina , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Cefalexina/uso terapêutico , TetraciclinasRESUMO
Cephalexin and cefadroxil are oral first-generation cephalosporins used to treat methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections. Despite its shorter half-life, cephalexin is more frequently prescribed, although cefadroxil is an appealing alternative, given its slower clearance and possibility for less frequent dosing. We report comparative MIC distributions for cefadroxil and cephalexin, as well as for oxacillin, cephalothin, ceftaroline, and cefazolin, for 48 unique clinical MSSA isolates from pediatric patients with musculoskeletal infections. Both cefadroxil and cephalexin had MIC50 values of 2 µg/mL and MIC90 values of 4 µg/mL. MIC50s for oxacillin, cephalothin, and ceftaroline were ≤0.25 µg/mL, and cefazolin's MIC50 was 0.5 µg/mL. While cefadroxil and cephalexin MICs are higher than those for other active agents, the distributions of MICs for cefadroxil and cephalexin are statistically equivalent, suggesting similar in vitro MSSA activities. Cefadroxil should be further considered an alternative agent to cephalexin, although additional work is needed to identify the optimal dose and frequency of these antibiotics for the treatment of serious MSSA infections. IMPORTANCE Cephalexin and cefadroxil are oral antibiotics that are used to treat serious infections due to the bacteria MSSA. While cephalexin is used more commonly, cefadroxil is excreted from the body more slowly; this generally allows patients to take cefadroxil less frequently than cephalexin. In this study, we compared the abilities of cefadroxil, cephalexin, and several other representative intravenous antibiotics to inhibit the growth of MSSA in the laboratory. Bacterial samples were obtained from children with bone, joint, and/or muscle infections caused by MSSA. We found that cefadroxil and cephalexin inhibited the growth of MSSA at similar concentrations, suggesting similar antibacterial potencies. The selected intravenous antistaphylococcal antibiotics generally inhibited bacterial growth with lower antibiotic concentrations. Based on these results, cefadroxil should be further considered an alternative oral antibiotic to cephalexin, although future research is needed to identify the optimal dose and frequency of these antibiotics for serious infections.
Assuntos
Cefalexina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bactérias , Cefadroxila/uso terapêutico , Cefazolina/farmacologia , Cefazolina/uso terapêutico , Cefalexina/farmacologia , Cefalexina/uso terapêutico , Cefalotina/uso terapêutico , Criança , Humanos , Meticilina/uso terapêutico , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Oxacilina/uso terapêutico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureusRESUMO
This case reminded us that not every moist, erythematous, crusting eruption is purely infectious.
Assuntos
Cefalexina/uso terapêutico , Otopatias/diagnóstico , Otopatias/tratamento farmacológico , Eczema/diagnóstico , Eczema/tratamento farmacológico , Eritema/diagnóstico , Eritema/tratamento farmacológico , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Criança , Doenças Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Doenças Transmissíveis/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Transmissíveis/fisiopatologia , Otopatias/fisiopatologia , Eczema/fisiopatologia , Eritema/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado do TratamentoAssuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cefalexina/uso terapêutico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/urina , Staphylococcus epidermidis/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/urina , Antibacterianos/urina , Cefalexina/urina , Criança , Humanos , Masculino , Recidiva , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Staphylococcus epidermidis/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Urinárias/diagnósticoAssuntos
Candidíase/complicações , Impetigo/complicações , Impetigo/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/complicações , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Bacitracina/uso terapêutico , Vesícula/complicações , Vesícula/diagnóstico , Vesícula/tratamento farmacológico , Candidíase/diagnóstico , Candidíase/tratamento farmacológico , Cefalexina/uso terapêutico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Dermatite das Fraldas/complicações , Testa/microbiologia , Humanos , Impetigo/tratamento farmacológico , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Nistatina/uso terapêutico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , TempoAssuntos
Artrite Infecciosa/diagnóstico , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Ferimentos Penetrantes Produzidos por Agulha/microbiologia , Autoadministração/efeitos adversos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Infecciosa/etiologia , Artrite Infecciosa/terapia , Cefazolina/uso terapêutico , Cefalexina/uso terapêutico , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Masculino , Infecções Estafilocócicas/etiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/terapia , Irrigação TerapêuticaRESUMO
La dermatosis denominada larva migrans cutánea: (LMC) es una infección cutánea secundaria a infestación parasitaria por la migración de larvas de anquilostomas animales a la epidermis humana, frecuentemente por contacto directo con suelos contaminados, especialmente en zonas tropicales. Se caracteriza por la aparición de lesiones induradas, eritematosas con patrón irregular o serpiginoso acompañado de prurito. Describimos un caso de LMC en una niña, adquirido durante unas vacaciones en Colombia y tratado inicialmente como celulitis con antibióticos (AU)
Cutaneous larva migrans (CLM) is an infection secondary to parasitic infestation due to the migration of animal hookworm larvae into the human skin, frequently by direct contact with contaminated grounds, especially in the tropics. Clinically, it is characterized by the appearance of indurated, erythematous lesions with irregular or "creeping eruption" pattern and pruritus. This article describes a case of CLM infection in a pediatric patient, it was acquired during the holidays in Colombia, diagnosed as cellulitis and treated accordingly with antibiotics without success (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Larva Migrans/diagnóstico , Celulite/diagnóstico , Dermatoses da Mão/diagnóstico , Ivermectina/uso terapêutico , Larva Migrans/tratamento farmacológico , Cefalexina/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Ibuprofeno/uso terapêutico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Celulite/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatoses da Mão/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antiparasitários/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
El síndrome de Mounier-Kuhn o traqueobroncomegalia constituye una rara entidad clínica y radiológica caracterizada por una dilatación de la tráquea y los bronquios principales. Puede asociarse con estructuras saculares en las membranas intercartilaginosas (diverticulosis traqueal), bronquiectasias e infecciones respiratorias a repetición. Las formas de presentación clínica son variables. Tiene una prevalencia entre el 1-4,5 por ciento de la población y se presenta, mayoritariamente, en hombres con un amplio rango etario que oscila entre los 20 y 50 años de edad. Se presenta el caso de un paciente masculino de 77 años con cuadros de infecciones respiratorias bajas a repetición desde la juventud. Luego de realizarle estudios de imagen y broncoscopia, se llegó al diagnóstico de síndrome de Mounier-Kunh. Recibió tratamiento antibiótico inmediatamente y su evolución fue de manera satisfactoria(AU)
Mounier-Kuhn syndrome or tracheobroncomegaly is a rare clinical and radiological entity characterized by dilatation of the trachea and the main bronchi. It can be associated with saccular structures in the intercartilaginous membranes (tracheal diverticulosis), bronchiectasis, and recurrent respiratory infections. The forms of clinical presentation vary. It has a prevalence between 1-4.5 percent of the population and it occurs mainly in men, widely ranging ages between 20 and 50 years of age. We report the case of a 77-year-old male patient with recurrent lower respiratory infections since his youth. After performing imaging studies and bronchoscopy, he could be diagnosed with Mounier-Kunh syndrome. He immediately underwent antibiotic treatment and his evolution was satisfactory(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Cefalexina/uso terapêutico , Traqueobroncomegalia/epidemiologia , Azitromicina/uso terapêutico , Tomografia Computadorizada Espiral/métodos , Traqueobroncomegalia/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Return visits to the emergency department (ED) and subsequent readmissions are common for patients who are unable to fill their prescriptions. We sought to determine if dispensing medications to patients in an ED was a cost-effective way to decrease return ED visits and hospital admissions for skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). METHODS: A retrospective review of ED visits for SSTIs, during the 24 weeks before and after the implementation of a medication dispensing program, was conducted. Charts were analyzed for both ED return visits and hospital admissions within 7 days and 30 days of the initial ED visit. Return visits were further reviewed to determine if the clinical conditions on subsequent visits were related to the initial ED presentation. A cost analysis comparing the cost of treatment to cost savings for return visits was also performed. RESULTS: Before the implementation of the medication dispensing program, the return rate in 7 days for the same condition was 9.1% and the rate of admission was 2.8%. The return rate for the same condition in 8-30 days was 2.1% and the rate of admission was 1.0%. After the implementation of the medication dispensing program, the return rate for the same condition in 7 days was 8.0%, and the admission rate was 1.7%. The return rate for the same condition in 8-30 days was 0.8%, and the admission rate was 0%. The total cost of dispensed medications was $4050, while total cost savings were estimated to be $95,477. CONCLUSION: A medication dispensing program in the ED led to a reduction in return visits and admissions for SSTIs at both 7 days and 30 days. For a cost of only $4050, an estimated total of $95,477 was saved. A medication dispensing program is a cost-effective way to reduce return visits to the ED and subsequent admissions for certain conditions.