The preparedness of disaster among nurses in community health centers in rural areas during the COVID-19 pandemic in Malang City.

Positive COVID-19 cases in Malang City, Indonesia continue to increase. Until 04 August 2021, the COVID-19 update shows 3301 positive cases with 7754 cured and 832 deaths. This study aims to identify nurses preparedness in rural area community health centers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Malang for self-control to implement health protocol. This study intends to provide insights on controlling COVID-19 spread in Malang, Indonesia. This research is a quantitative study with correlative analytic observational design and a cross-sectional approach involving 120 nurses from 16 primary health centers. The results of the bivariate analysis using gamma correlation test are: knowledge factors (p = 0.005; r = 0.35), attitude (p = 0.000; r = 0.46), means of infrastructure (p = 0.000; r = 0.54), and self-control (p = 0.000; r = 0.52) for the quarantined COVID-19 patients. Knowledge, attitude, infrastructure, and safe house factors can influence self-control for COVID-19. In rural areas, health education-as education and empowerment for patient self-control-is an effort to encourage them to obey health protocol during the pandemic. Nurse readiness and preparedness during the pandemic is crucial for strengthening the assertive behavior commitment through self-control. This ensures the community's awareness of the importance of complying with health protocols for the common good. Mental nursing intervention needs to be added as a part of psychosocial therapy for the community's social problems, primarily in reducing the pressure due to the social distancing enforcement to control and prevent COVID-19 spread.

Outcomes of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology in community- vs. institution-performed cytology.

OBJECTIVES: Despite the important role of the community in the assessment and risk stratification of patients with thyroid nodules, evidence-based data on the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) performance in community clinics is lacking. We aim to evaluate BSRTC performance of aspirations taken in community clinics compared with primary referral center. METHODS: Patients who underwent thyroid surgery between 2013 and 2018 at our institution were divided according to the fine needle aspirations (FNA) settings: community FNA (cFNA) vs. institutional FNA (iFNA). Demographics, BSRTC results and final pathology were collected. Diagnostic values were calculated for BSRTC categories (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], and negative predictive value [NPV]), and were compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 268 nodules were included in the study; 77% (207) cFNA and 23% (61) iFNA. Patients in the community were younger (51.7 ± 15.1 vs. 56.6 years±14.8, p = 0.03) and with less epidemiology risk factors for thyroid cancer (1.9% vs 13.1%, p < 0.001). cFNA malignancy rate for BSRTC I-VI was 0%, 6.4%, 11.8%, 32.1%, 91.6% and 93.8% respectively. Best sensitivity was found for BSRTC III-VI in both groups (88% and 83%, cFNAs and iFNAs, respectively). Overall best performance was obtained for BSRTC V-VI for both groups (cfNA: 85%, 97%, 93%, 94% and 93%; iFNAs: 81%, 100%, 100%, 87% and 91%, for sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Community-performed FNAs demonstrate acceptable BSRTC distribution and malignancy rates, comparable with a primary referral academic hospital. This supports the universality of the BSRTC 2017 and its recommendations also in the community.

Validation Checklist for Massive Vaccination Centers.

Abstract: Starting from the minimum requirements indicated by Lombardy Region, a validation checklist has been developed by experts in design, healthcare layout planning, hygiene and public health, planning and compliance, in order to provide managers of COVID-19 massive vaccination centers with a useful and easy-to-use tool to ensure quality, safety and efficiency of the different activities performed.

Schools on the front lines: School based health centers amidst COVID-19.

School based health centers (SBHCs) are often at the front line of medical and mental health services for students in the schools they serve. Citywide school closures in New York City in March 2020 and ongoing social distancing procedures resulted in significant changes in SBHC services as well as access to these services. Furthermore, the combination of COVID-19 related stressors and the increased likelihood of adverse childhood events experienced by urban youth creates conditions for the exacerbation of mental health concerns among youth in metropolitan areas. The following article will explore the role of SBHCs as community agents focused on prevention and reduction of mental health concerns prior and during the current pandemic, as well as existing health disparities experienced by urban youth populations. The authors will also discuss research examining mental health concerns already present in global populations affected by COVID-19 as it may foreshadow the challenges to be faced by U.S. urban youth. Lastly, the authors describe recommendations, practice implications, and opportunities for preventative strategies and therapeutic interventions in school based health settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Quality and Cost in Community Health Centers.

BACKGROUND: Quantifying health care quality has long presented a challenge to identifying the relationship between provider level quality and cost. However, growing focus on quality improvement has led to greater interest in organizational performance, prompting payers to collect various indicators of quality that can be combined at the provider level. OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between quality and average cost of medical visits provided in US Community Health Centers (CHCs) using composite measures of quality. RESEARCH DESIGN: Using the Uniform Data System collected by the Bureau of Primary Care, we constructed composite measures by combining 9 process and 2 outcome indicators of primary care quality provided in 1331 US CHCs during 2015-2018. We explored different weighting schemes and different combinations of individual quality indicators constructed at the intermediate domain levels of chronic condition control, screening, and medication management. We used generalized linear modeling to regress average cost of a medical visit on composite quality measures, controlling for patient and health center factors. We examined the sensitivity of results to different weighting schemes and to combining individual quality indicators at the overall level compared with the intermediate domain level. RESULTS: Both overall and domain level composites performed well in the estimations. Average cost of a medical visit was negatively associated with quality, although the magnitude of the effect varied across weighting schemes. CONCLUSION: Efforts toward improvement of primary health care quality delivered in CHCs need not involve greater cost.

Application for Public Health Accreditation Among US Local Health Departments in 2013 to 2019: Impact of Service and Activity Mix.

Objectives. To examine correlates of applying for accreditation among small local health departments (LHDs) in the United States through 2019.Methods. We used administrative data from the Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB) and 2013, 2016, and 2019 Profile data from the National Association of County and City Health Officials to examine correlates of applying for PHAB accreditation. We fit a latent class analysis (LCA) to characterize LHDs by service mix and size. We made bivariate comparisons using the t test and Pearson χ2.Results. By the end of 2019, 126 small LHDs had applied for accreditation (8%). When we compared reasons for not pursuing accreditation, we observed a difference by size for perceptions that standards exceeded LHD capacity (47% for small vs 22% for midsized [P < .001] and 0% for large [P < .001]).Conclusions. Greater funding support, considering differing standards by LHD size, and recognition that service mix might affect practicality of accreditation are all relevant considerations in attempting to increase uptake of accreditation for small LHDs.Public Health Implications. Overall, small LHDs represented about 60% of all LHDs that had not yet applied to PHAB.

Community and Case Management Interventions to Address Social Determinants of Health in Infectious Disease.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: Professional case managers are responsible to conduct education, counseling, and other interventions that address the unique needs and gaps of the patients and families they serve. Social determinants of health (SDH) can impact barriers to patient care and outcomes that may go undetected among underserved populations without reliable data. This article describes an implementation science study using patient and provider-informed data and designed interventions to mitigate barriers in SDH related to hepatitis B virus (HBV). PRIMARY PRACTICE SETTINGS: Case managers and other health care team members in community health clinics examined discordances in their own patients' and providers' beliefs about patients' barriers to HBV care. Data were then used to help identify and engage unique strategies in education, counseling, and clinic outreach to improve outcomes in HBV and lessen barriers to care among at-risk minority populations. FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS: Findings from data and information conducted among the clinic patients and health care team members revealed many important barriers in key aspects of SDH occurring in each clinic. As a result, case managers and other health care team members were able to examine distinct differences in what they predicted their patients would say versus what patients actually answered about SDH aspects of their care experiences, including barriers in access to care, health monitoring, and treatment of HBV. IMPLICATIONS FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE: The study and data results have implications for case management practice that may also be applied to other infectious diseases. Implications include patient and community outreach strategies to improve access to care; resource management techniques to improve referrals and disease monitoring; and ongoing and improved education and counseling to change behaviors associated with infectious disease prevention, screening, and linkage to care.

Association of Patient-Centered Medical Home designation and quality indicators within HRSA-funded community health center delivery sites.

BACKGROUND: Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) adoption is an important strategy to help improve primary care quality within Health Resources and Service Administration (HRSA) community health centers (CHC), but evidence of its effect thus far remains mixed. A limitation of previous evaluations has been the inability to account for the proportion of CHC delivery sites that are designated medical homes. METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional study using HRSA Uniform Data System (UDS) and certification files from the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) and the Joint Commission (JC). Datasets were linked through geocoding and an approximate string-matching algorithm. Predicted probability scores were regressed onto 11 clinical performance measures using 10% increments in site-level designation using beta logistic regression. RESULTS: The geocoding and approximate string-matching algorithm identified 2615 of the 6851 (41.8%) delivery sites included in the analyses as having been designated through the NCQA and/or JC. In total, 74.7% (n = 777) of the 1039 CHCs that met the inclusion criteria for the analysis managed at least one NCQA- and/or JC-designated site. A proportional increase in site-level designation showed a positive association with adherence scores for the majority of all indicators, but primarily among CHCs that designated at least 50% of its delivery sites. Once this threshold was achieved, there was a stepwise percentage point increase in adherence scores, ranging from 1.9 to 11.8% improvement, depending on the measure. CONCLUSION: Geocoding and approximate string-matching techniques offer a more reliable and nuanced approach for monitoring the association between site-level PCMH designation and clinical performance within HRSA's CHC delivery sites. Our findings suggest that transformation does in fact matter, but that it may not appear until half of the delivery sites become designated. There also appears to be a continued stepwise increase in adherence scores once this threshold is achieved.

Comparison of Patients' Perceived Quality of Primary Care Between Urban and Rural Community Health Centers in Guangdong, China.

BACKGROUND: A series of reforms were implemented to improve the quality of primary care services in China. This study aims to assess patients' perceived quality of primary healthcare between rural and urban community health centers in Guangdong. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from July to December 2015 in Guangdong. We surveyed 1010 respondents who visited either community health centers/stations (CHCs/CHSs) in urban areas or township health centers/rural health stations (THCs/RHSs) in rural areas. A validated Chinese version of the Primary Care Assessment Tool-Adult Short Version (PCAT-AS), representing ten primary care domains, was used to collect information on patients' primary care experiences. A t-test was used for comparison on domain scores and total scores between patients from CHCs/CHSs and THCs/RHSs. An analysis of covariance was employed to compare the adjusted PCAT domain scores and total scores. Multilevel models were used to explore factors associated with PCAT total scores. RESULTS: Overall, patients reported a lower level of experience of community orientation and family centeredness compared to other primary care domains. Patients from THCs/RHSs settings in the rural area reported better primary care experience in four domains, including first contact, accessibility, ongoing care, and community orientation. Higher education background and those with a chronic disease were associated with better primary care experience, after controlling for confounding factors. Patients who preferred primary care institutions when getting sick or used health services more frequently reported better primary care experiences. CONCLUSION: Continued efforts are needed to strengthen primary care performances, particularly in a community orientation and family centeredness. Primary care delivery in CHCs/CHSs settings should be improved in four domains, including first contact, accessibility, ongoing care, and community orientation.

Capturing Relevant Patient Data in Clinical Encounters Through Integration of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System Into Routine Primary Care in a Boston Community Health Center: Development and Implementation Study.

BACKGROUND: Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems can improve health outcomes by detecting health issues or risk behaviors that may be missed when relying on provider elicitation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to implement an ePRO system that administers key health questionnaires in an urban community health center in Boston, Massachusetts. METHODS: An ePRO system that administers key health questionnaires was implemented in an urban community health center in Boston, Massachusetts. The system was integrated with the electronic health record so that medical providers could review and adjudicate patient responses in real-time during the course of the patient visit. This implementation project was accomplished through careful examination of clinical workflows and a graduated rollout process that was mindful of patient and clinical staff time and burden. Patients responded to questionnaires using a tablet at the beginning of their visit. RESULTS: Our program demonstrates that implementation of an ePRO system in a primary care setting is feasible, allowing for facilitation of patient-provider communication and care. Other community health centers can learn from our model in terms of applying technological innovation to streamline clinical processes and improve patient care. CONCLUSIONS: Our program demonstrates that implementation of an ePRO system in a primary care setting is feasible, allowing for facilitation of patient-provider communication and care. Other community health centers can learn from our model for application of technological innovation to streamline clinical processes and improve patient care.

Case Management and Capacity Building to Enhance Hepatitis C Treatment Uptake at Community Health Centers in a Large Urban Setting.

An estimated 4.1 million people in the United States are infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). In 2014, the Hepatitis C Community Alliance to Test and Treat (HepCCATT) collaborative was formed to address hepatitis C in Chicago. From 2014 to 2017, the HepCCATT Case Management Program case managed 181 HCV-infected people and performed on-site capacity building at a 6-site community health center (CHC) that produced codified protocols, which were translated into a telehealth program to build capacity within CHCs to deliver hepatitis C care. HepCCATT's innovative approach to addressing multilevel barriers is a potential model for increasing access to hepatitis C care and treatment.

Standardizing a federally qualified health center's preventive care processes: Use of failure modes and effects analysis.

: A multisite federally qualified health center used a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis to identify and correct potential challenges to the implementation of the proactive office encounter model. This model is designed to proactively identify and close preventive care gaps through electronic medical record use, new workflows, and staff training.

The impact of hospital attributes on patient choice for first visit: evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Shanghai, China.

The underutilization of primary care in urban China threatens the efficiency and effectiveness of the Chinese health system. To guide patient flow to primary care, the Chinese government has rolled out a sequence of health care reforms which improve the affordability, the infrastructure and workforce of the primary care system. However, these measures have not yielded the desired effect on the utilization of primary care, which is lowest in urban areas. It is unclear how the factors identified to influence facility choice in urban China are actually impacting choice behaviour. We conducted a discrete choice experiment to elicit the quantitative impact of facility attributes when choosing a health care facility for first visit and analysed how the stated choice varies with these attributes. We found that the respondents placed different weights on the identified attributes, depending on whether they perceived their condition to be minor or severe. For conditions perceived as minor, the respondents valued visit time, equipment and medical skill most. For conditions perceived as severe, they placed most importance on equipment, travel time and facility size. We found that for conditions perceived as minor, only 14% preferred visiting a facility over opting out, a percentage which would more than double to 37% if community health centres were maximally improved. For conditions perceived as severe, improvements in community health centres may almost double first visits to primary care, mostly from patients who would otherwise choose higher-level facilities. Our findings suggest that for both severity conditions, improvements to medical equipment and medical skill at community health centres in urban China can effectively direct patient flow to primary care and promote the efficiency and effectiveness of the urban health system.

Does increased implementation support improve community clinics' guideline-concordant care? Results of a mixed methods, pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial.

BACKGROUND: Disseminating care guidelines into clinical practice remains challenging, partly due to inadequate evidence on how best to help clinics incorporate new guidelines into routine care. This is particularly true in safety net community health centers (CHCs). METHODS: This pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial used a parallel mixed methods design. Twenty-nine CHC clinics were randomized to receive increasingly intensive implementation support (implementation toolkit (arm 1); toolkit + in-person training + training webinars (arm 2); toolkit + training + webinars + offered practice facilitation (arm 3)) targeting uptake of electronic health record (EHR) tools focused on guideline-concordant cardioprotective prescribing for patients with diabetes. Outcomes were compared across study arms, to test whether increased support yielded additive improvements, and with 137 non-study CHCs that share the same EHR as the study clinics. Quantitative data from the CHCs' EHR were used to compare the magnitude of change in guideline-concordant ACE/ARB and statin prescribing, using adjusted Poisson regressions. Qualitative data collected using diverse methods (e.g., interviews, observations) identified factors influencing the quantitative outcomes. RESULTS: Outcomes at CHCs receiving higher-intensity support did not improve in an additive pattern. ACE/ARB prescribing did not improve in any CHC group. Statin prescribing improved overall and was significantly greater only in the arm 1 and arm 2 CHCs compared with the non-study CHCs. Factors influencing the finding of no additive impact included: aspects of the EHR tools that reduced their utility, barriers to providing the intended implementation support, and study design elements, e.g., inability to adapt the provided support. Factors influencing overall improvements in statin outcomes likely included a secular trend in awareness of statin prescribing guidelines, selection bias where motivated clinics volunteered for the study, and study participation focusing clinic staff on the targeted outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to implement care guidelines should: ensure adaptability when providing implementation support and conduct formative evaluations to determine the optimal form of such support for a given clinic; consider how study data collection influences adoption; and consider barriers to clinics' ability to use/accept implementation support as planned. More research is needed on supporting change implementation in under-resourced settings like CHCs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02325531. Registered 15 December 2014.

Implementation of Off-Site Integrated Care for Children: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: As an alternative to co-located integrated care, off-site integration (partnerships between primary care and non-embedded specialty mental health providers) can address the growing need for pediatric mental health services. Our goal is to review the existing literature on implementing off-site pediatric integrated care. METHODS: We systematically searched the literature for peer-reviewed publications on off-site pediatric integrated care interventions. We included studies that involved systematic data collection and analysis, both qualitative and quantitative, of implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability). RESULTS: We found 39 original articles from 24 off-site programs with a variety of study designs, most with secondary implementation outcomes. Models of off-site integration varied primarily along two dimensions: direct vs. indirect, and in-person vs. remote. Overall, off-site models were acceptable to providers, particularly when the following were present: strong interdisciplinary communication, timely availability and reliability of services, additional support beyond one-time consultation, and standardized care algorithms. Adoption and penetration were facilitated by enhanced program visibility, including on-site champions. Certain clinical populations (e.g., school-age, less complicated ADHD) seemed more amenable to off-site integrated models than others (e.g., preschool-age, conduct disorders). Lack of funding and inadequate reimbursement limited sustainability in all models. CONCLUSIONS: Off-site interventions are feasible, acceptable, and often adopted widely with adequate planning, administrative support, and interprofessional communication. Studies that focus primarily on implementation and that consider the perspectives of specialty providers and patients are needed.

Permanence of professionals who work in the Tuberculosis Control Program / Permanencia de profesionales que actúan en el Programa de Control de la Tuberculosis / Permanência de profissionais que atuam no programa de controle da tuberculose

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the length of stay of the professionals who work in the Tuberculosis Control Program in Basic Health Units of the city of Rio de Janeiro/RJ. Method: Sectional study, developed in eight Health Units of the Maré Complex/RJ. Physicians, nurses, nursing technicians and Community Health Agents of the Family Health Teams were interviewed. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to verify the existence of groups with the same distribution, and Dunn's multiple comparison test with Bonferroni correction, to identify which group presented a difference. Results: Among Health Units, a significant difference was observed in the length of work (p-value = 0.0005909) and in the dwell time (p-value = 0.0003598). Conclusion: It was observed low length of stay of the professionals that work in the Basic Health Units. This result points to challenges inherent in the control of tuberculosis at the local level.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Analizar el tiempo de permanencia de los profesionales que actúan en el Programa de Control de la Tuberculosis en Unidades Básicas de Salud del municipio de Río de Janeiro/RJ. Método: Estudio seccional, desarrollado en ocho Unidades de Salud del Complejo de la Maré/RJ. Entrevistaron médicos, enfermeros, técnicos de enfermería y Agentes Comunitarios de Salud de los Equipos de Salud de la Familia. Se optó por la prueba de Kruskal-Wallis para verificar la existencia de grupos con la misma distribución, y prueba de comparaciones múltiples de Dunn, con corrección de Bonferroni, para identificar qué grupo presentaba diferencia. Resultados: Entre las Unidades de Salud, se comprueba diferencia significativa en el tiempo de ejercicio de la función (p-value = 0,0005909) y en el tiempo de permanencia (p-value = 0,0003598). Conclusión: Se constató bajo tiempo de permanencia de los profesionales que actúan en las Unidades Básicas de Salud. Este resultado apunta a desafíos inherentes al control de la tuberculosis a nivel local.

RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar o tempo de permanência dos profissionais que atuam no Programa de Controle da Tuberculose em Unidades Básicas de Saúde do município do Rio de Janeiro/RJ. Método: Estudo seccional, desenvolvido em oito Unidades de Saúde do Complexo da Maré/RJ. Entrevistaram-se médicos, enfermeiros, técnicos de enfermagem e Agentes Comunitários de Saúde das Equipes de Saúde da Família. Optou-se pelo teste de Kruskal-Wallis para verificar a existência de grupos com a mesma distribuição, e teste de comparações múltiplas de Dunn, com correção de Bonferroni, para identificar qual grupo apresentava diferença. Resultados: Entre as Unidades de Saúde, comprova-se diferença significativa no tempo de exercício da função (p-value = 0,0005909) e no tempo de permanência (p-value = 0,0003598). Conclusão: Constatou-se baixo tempo de permanência dos profissionais que atuam nas Unidades Básicas de Saúde. Esse resultado aponta para desafios inerentes ao controle da tuberculose em nível local.

Permanence of professionals who work in the Tuberculosis Control Program.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the length of stay of the professionals who work in the Tuberculosis Control Program in Basic Health Units of the city of Rio de Janeiro/RJ. METHOD: Sectional study, developed in eight Health Units of the Maré Complex/RJ. Physicians, nurses, nursing technicians and Community Health Agents of the Family Health Teams were interviewed. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to verify the existence of groups with the same distribution, and Dunn's multiple comparison test with Bonferroni correction, to identify which group presented a difference. RESULTS: Among Health Units, a significant difference was observed in the length of work (p-value = 0.0005909) and in the dwell time (p-value = 0.0003598). CONCLUSION: It was observed low length of stay of the professionals that work in the Basic Health Units. This result points to challenges inherent in the control of tuberculosis at the local level.

Quality of intrapartum care for healthy women with spontaneous onset of labour in Rwanda: A health facility-based, cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the quality of intrapartum care provided at Rwandan healthcare facilities to women undergoing normal pregnancy and spontaneous full-term labour. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted over eight weeks during 2014-2015 in 18 healthcare facilities in Kigali City and the Northern Province: eight health centres, seven district hospitals, one provincial hospital, one private hospital, and one referral hospital. Data were collected from medical records and a questionnaire including the Bologna score with its five variables: presence of a companion, use of partograph, no augmentation of labour, birth in a non-supine position, and skin-to skin contact. RESULTS: Among the 435 women who fulfilled the inclusion criteria during the study period, mean age was 27.4 years and 41.8% were primiparous. The assisting healthcare professionals were midwives (49.4%), nurses (28.8%), and physicians (22%), and birth occurred at health centres (29%), district hospitals (40%), and the referral hospital (31%). Mean Bologna score was 2.03 of the maximum 5 (range: 0-4). Only one woman (0.2%) had a companion present (her husband). A partograph was used for the majority (84.8%), and 88.0% had no augmentation of labour with oxytocin. Few (6.2%) gave birth in a non-supine position, and few (12.4%) had early skin-to-skin contact with their newborn. CONCLUSION: There are several areas for improving childbirth care according to the Bologna score. Healthy newborns should be placed skin-to-skin with their mothers shortly after birth, non-supine birthing positions should be encouraged, and the importance of a companion during labour and birth should be considered.