Long-term assessment of visual and refractive outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia using the AMARIS® 750S Excimer laser.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using the AMARIS® 750S (Schwind, Eye-tech-solutions, GmbH) excimer laser. METHODS: The medical records of one hundred eleven eyes of 62 patients who underwent LASIK for hyperopia using the AMARIS® 750S excimer laser were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were divided into three groups based on preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) refraction: low hyperopia (less than +2.50 diopters [D]), moderate hyperopia (+2.75D to +4.00D), and high hyperopia (over +4.00D). Uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), long-term stability of refraction, and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the entire sample, the mean preoperative SE was +3.64D±1.22D. The mean age was 37.4±11.2 years (20-59). The mean follow-up for all eyes was 51 months. At the last visit, the mean SE was +0.85D±0.34D (SD) in the low hyperopia group, +1.09D±0.43D in the moderate hyperopia group, and +1.63D±0.47D in the high hyperopia group. (+1.15D±0.49D overall). Preoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 0.52±0.34 logMAR and increased to 0.18±0.15 logMAR at 4 years follow-up (P<0.01). There was no statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative BCVA. The UCVA was 0.30 logMAR or better in 100% of eyes in the low hyperopia group, 93.7% in the moderate hyperopia group, and 69.9% in the high hyperopia group (%89.2 overall). CONCLUSIONS: LASIK is safe and effective for correcting hyperopia in the short term; however, the efficacy of the procedure is limited in the patients with high hyperopia and longer follow-up.

Long-Term Outcomes of Refractive Surgery Performed During the Military.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the long-term refractive results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) performed by the military in a veteran population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital sites (Puget Sound, Buffalo, and Washington D.C.) obtained IRB approval for this multi-center study. Comprehensive ophthalmologic assessment including refraction and keratometry were obtained at the time of the long-term VA examination and compared to the patients' postoperative military records. RESULTS: Eighty patients (160 eyes) enrolled in this study. At the time of treatment, patients were 21-52 years of age. Long-term post-operative data was available from 4 to 17 years post-operatively. Fifteen percent of the treatment types were LASIK and 85% PRK. At the time of their military post-operative exam (range 3-14 months, mean 4 months), 82% of patients had uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better, and their average manifest refraction was -0.08 D (SD ± 0.48 D). At the time of the long-term ophthalmological exam at the VA medical centers (range 4-11 years, mean of 8.2 years), 49% of patients had an UCVA of 20/20 or better and an average manifest refraction was -0.64 D (SD ± 0.69 D). CONCLUSION: This is the first long-term study evaluating refractive surgery outcomes up to 17 years in a military population. Our study demonstrates safety after refractive surgery in the military with less than 0.1D increase in myopia per year and strong keratometric stability. Other changes in the eye may be the likely cause for this observed mild refractive shift.

Dry Eye after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) versus Femtosecond Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for Myopia: A Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare dry eye after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK) for correcting myopia. METHODS: CENTRAL, Embase and PubMed were searched in November 2016. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohorts that compared dry eye after SMILE with FS-LASIK were selected. RESULTS: Five cohorts and one RCT were identified for comparing dry eye after SMILE (291 eyes) and FS-LASIK (277 eyes). The pooled results revealed that the SMILE and FS-LASIK groups did not differ significantly in terms of Schirmer's I test (SIT) and tear film osmolarity (TFO) at any postoperative visits. By contrast, tear break up time (TBUT; p = 0.04 for one month, p < 0.001 for three months, and p = 0.02 for six months) and ocular surface disease index (OSDI; p < 0.001 for one month and three months, and p = 0.006 for six months) were significantly worse in the FS-LASIK group than in the SMILE group at follow-up. At six months postoperatively, TBUT and TFO values in both the SMILE and FS-LASIK groups and OSDI scores in the SMILE group returned to preoperative levels, but SIT values in both groups (p = 0.02 for the SMILE group and p < 0.001 for the FS-LASIK group) and OSDI in the FS-LASIK group (p < 0.001) were still statistically impaired. CONCLUSION: Dry eye after both SMILE and FS-LASIK usually occurs transiently. SMILE does not show obvious superiority over FS-LASIK by exhibiting similar and acceptable objective parameters, and SMILE may have milder subjective symptoms.

[Evaluation of vision quality after laser vision correction in healthcare professionals]. / Évaluation de la qualité de vision après chirurgie réfractive au laser chez les professionnels de santé.

PURPOSE: Healthcare professionals require good quality of vision. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the satisfaction and vision quality after laser vision correction in healthcare professionals. METHODS: This is a monocentric retrospective study. An online 25-question survey was sent to ametropic physicians, surgeons and nurses who underwent corneal refractive surgery with laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) between July 2012 and February 2016. Questionnaire responses were recorded anonymously by the internet survey site. These patients' pre- and postoperative data were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 2491 laser vision corrections were performed during this time frame. One hundred and fifty-eight patients were healthcare providers; 131 received the survey, and 111 responded. Ninety-nine were surgeons, 60 were medical physicians, and 32 were nurses. Ninety-one percent reported that they were satisfied with their postoperative vision quality, 63.9% even reported an improvement in their quality of vision compared with their corrected preoperative vision, 92.8% reported that they would have the procedure again, and 94.6% would recommend the procedure to a family member or a patient. Visual outcomes showed high levels of efficacy and predictability. CONCLUSION: While healthcare professionals require good quality of vision, those who had undergone laser vision correction reported the same satisfaction as the general population and would recommend the procedure to their family, friends and patients.

[Intraocular pressure, ocular blood flow, and corneal biomechanics changes after LASIK surgery for myopia]. / Vliyanie operatsii LASIK pri miopii na pokazateli oftal'motonusa, ob''emnogo glaznogo krovotoka i «biomekhaniki¼ rogovitsy.

AIM: to study changes in intraocular pressure (IOP), volumetric ocular blood flow (OBF) rate, and biomechanical properties of the cornea after excimer laser ablation in patients with myopia of different degrees. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 16 patients (32 eyes) with myopia ranging from 2.75 to 9.0 D were examined before and after LASIK. Ocular Blood Flow Analyzer (OBFA) was used to measure IOP and OBF as well as pulse amplitude and volume. Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) was also employed to provide the following data: Goldmann-equivalent IOP, corneal compensated IOP, corneal hysteresis, and corneal resistance factor. The eyes were then divided into two groups: group 1 - 15 eyes with less than 70-µm deep ablation of the cornea and group 2 - 17 eyes with more than 70-µm deep ablation. RESULTS: Group 1 demonstrated a statistically reliable decrease in IOP values provided by either method and biomechanical parameters of the cornea (p<0.005), but no difference in pre- and postoperative OBF, or pulse amplitude, or pulse volume (p>0.05). In group 2, all the parameters changed reliably, except for the pulse volume (p>0.05). In particular, a decrease was recorded for IOP (with no dependence to the method of measurement; p<0.001), pulse amplitude (p<0.01), corneal hysteresis (p<0.001), and corneal resistance factor (p<0.001); an increase - for OBF (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: One should allow for possible mismeasurement of IOP and OBF as well as biomechanical parameters of the cornea in post-LASIK patients, keeping in mind that the extent of error depends on the depth of ablation. Shallow ablation (no more than 70-µm deep) has no statistically significant effect on OBF readings, while IOP seems to decrease considerably. In deep ablation (more than 70-µm deep), both parameters are reliably lower than at baseline.

[Clinical analysis of complications of LASIK using the WaveLight FS200 femtosecond laser].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the incidence of intraoperative and early postoperative complications associated with the WaveLight FS200 femtosecond laser-assisted flap creation in LASIK surgery. METHODS: A consecutive series of 400 patients (786 eyes) who underwent LASIK using the WaveLight FS200 femtosecond laser from March 2011 to December 2012 were included in this retrospective study. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications were described and analyzed. RESULTS: The intraoperative complications included suction loss (two eyes, 0.25%), incomplete flap creation (one eye, 0.13%), severe opaque bubble layers (three eyes, 0.38%), anterior chamber gas bubbles (eight eyes, 1.02%), skip lines (12 eyes, 1.53%), and corneal epithelial defects (eight eyes, 1.02%). The early postoperative complications included canal bleeding (eight eyes, 1.02%), diffuse lamellar keratitis (23 eyes, 2.93%), haze (six eyes, 0.76% ), and flap dislocation (one eye, 0.13% ). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative and early postoperative complications of LASIK using the WaveLight FS200 were relatively mild. All patients could obtain satisfactory clinical results with proper treatment.

Caracterización morfológica de la superficie corneal posterior en córneas normales / Morphological characterization of the posterior corneal surface in normal corneas

OBJETIVO: describir las características de la superficie corneal posterior en córneas normales y las modificaciones de esta en pacientes a quienes se les realizó queratomileusis con láser in situ. MÉTODOS: fue realizado un estudio descriptivo, longitudinal y prospectivo en 282 ojos de pacientes que asistieron a la consulta de cirugía refractiva. Las variables estudiadas fueron: queratometría media central posterior, equivalente esférico, paquimetría óptica en la posición más delgada, astigmatismo topográfico anterior y posterior, astigmatismo refractivo y variación morfológica del mapa topográfico de elevación posterior respecto a la esfera de mejor ajuste. Fueron escogidos 27 ojos, los cuales reunían los criterios para cirugía refractiva láser y se les realizó la técnica queratomileusis con láser in situ. Se analizaron también las variables cantidad de ablación, estroma residual y diferencia de elevación posterior corneal, esta última obtenida del mapa de diferencia del tomógrafo Pentacam HR. RESULTADOS: la queratometría media posterior fue de -6,37 ± 0,22 dioptrías; la correlación entre la queratometría media posterior con respecto a la paquimetría óptica fue muy significativa (p= 0,008). La media de la diferencia de elevación máxima con respecto a la esfera de mejor ajuste posterior fue 5,33 µm; el 93,3 % de la muestra se encontraba dentro de valores normales. La diferencia de elevación posterior a través del tiempo fue de 18,38 µm ± 7,47 al mes y 14,95 µm ± 10,02. Se observó relación con la paquimetría y el estroma residual. CONCLUSIONES: la queratomileusis con láser in situ determina modificaciones en la superficie corneal posterior. El estroma residual es el factor más relacionado con estas modificaciones.

OBJECTIVE: to describe the characteristics of the posterior corneal surface in normal corneas and its changes in patients who underwent laser in situ keratomileusis. METHODS: prospective, longitudinal and descriptive study of 282 eyes from patients who went to the refractive surgery service. The studied variables were posterior central mean keratomery, spheral equivalent, optical pakimetry at the thinnest position, anterior and posterior topographic astigmatism, refractive astigmatism and morphological variation of the posterior elevation topographic map in relation to the best fit sphere. In this group, 27 eyes were selected, which met the criteria for laser refractive surgery using the laser in situ keratomileusis. Other analyzed variables were ablation amount, residual stroma and posterior corneal elevation difference, being the latter taken from the difference map outlined with the Pentacam HR tomography. RESULTS: mean posterior keratometry was -6,37 ± 0,22 dioptries; the correlation between mean posterior keratometry and optical pakimetry was very significant (p= 0,008). The mean difference of maximum elevation with respect to the best posterior fit sphere was 5,33 µm; 93,3 % of the sample was within the normal values. The correlation between the posterior elevation and the spheral equivalent was also significant (p= 0,019). The difference of the posterior elevation throughout the period was 18,38 µm ± 7,47 after a month and 14,95 µm ± 10,02 at the end of the period. There was correlation with pakimetry and residual stroma. CONCLUSIONS: laser in situ keratomileusis causes changes in the posterior corneal surface. The residual stroma is the factor most related with these changes.

Assessment of pupillary influence in LASIK patients using a digital pupillometer and VQF 25 questionnaire.

PURPOSE: Identify ideal profiles in patients undergoing to photorefractive laser surgery with the aid of an automated pupillometry and psychometric analysis of patients with visual function questionnaire (VQF 25). METHODS: Seventy-seven patients undergoing photorefractive laser surgery laser (LASIK) were analyzed with the aid of an automated digital pupillometer based on an infrared camera coupled to the optical head of a videokeratography system. Patients underwent complete ophthalmic evaluation and documentation of the pupillary behavior under different intensities of illumination, simulating situations of everyday life. Visual quality function questionnaire, translated to Portuguese was assessed. RESULTS: All patients, regardless of pupillary change under varying conditions of illumination (scotopic, mesopic and photopic) showed improvement in all sub-groups of the VQF 25. Pupil diameter was not the primary determinant of patients' visual satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Despite digital pupillometer has proven to be a useful tool in documenting and understanding of pupil behavior, a set of factors such as psycho-social profile, preoperative ametropy and final residual ametropy, contributed decisively to determine the degree of satisfaction of patients undergoing LASIK.

Moving from a mechanical microkeratome to a femtosecond laser for LASIK to correct astigmatic patients: clinical outcomes of a retrospective, consecutive, comparative study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate outcomes after optimized laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for astigmatism correction with flap created by a mechanical microkeratome or a femtosecond laser. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 102 eyes of 71 consecutive patients were enrolled undergoing optimized LASIK treatments using the Allegretto laser system (WaveLight Laser Technologie AG, Erlangen, Germany). A mechanical microkeratome for flap creation was used (One Use, Moria®) in 46 eyes (31 patients, spherical equivalent [SE] -4.44 D ± 2.4) and a femtosecond laser was used (LDV, Ziemer®) in 56 eyes (40 patients, spherical equivalent [SE] -3.07 D ± 3.3). The two groups were matched for inclusion criteria and were operated under similar conditions by the same surgeon. RESULTS: Overall, the preoperative spherical equivalent was -9.5 diopters (D) to +3.37 D; the preoperative manifest astigmatism was between -1.5 D and -3.5 D. At 6 months postoperatively, the mean postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 0.93 ± 0.17 (range 0.4 to 1.2) in the Moria group and 1.0 ± 0.21 (range 0.6 to 1.6) in the Femto group, which was statistically significant (p = 0.003). Comparing the cylinder power there was a statistical difference between the two groups (p = 0.0015). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the method of flap creation has a significant impact on postoperative astigmatism with a significantly better postoperative UDVA in the Femto group. These findings suggest that the femtosecond laser provides a better platform for LASIK treatment of astigmatism than the commonly used microkeratome.