Determination of the nateglinide polymorphic purity through DSC.

It is well known that the control of the crystallization of drugs to ensure that only the approved and desired polymorph is present in the formulation is a crucial point of a preformulation study. In this regard, the aim of the present work is to devise a method for the quantification of the polymorphic purity of nateglinide in mixtures formed by polymorphs H and B. In order to achieve this goal, binary systems of known composition have been prepared and the melting peaks of both polymorphs have been recorded by differential scanning calorimetry. Experiments have determined that the method of preparation of the mixtures has to be carefully evaluated. Indeed it has been shown that grinding the samples induces transition from B to H form. Furthermore, it could be observed that the enrichment of the binary mixture with H form is caused by heating. Therefore, after having prepared the mixture without grinding stage, we propose a method to evaluate the content of H polymorph in mixture with the B one from the melting peak of B.

Maraviroc versus efavirenz, both in combination with zidovudine-lamivudine, for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive subjects with CCR5-tropic HIV-1 infection.

BACKGROUND: The MERIT (Maraviroc versus Efavirenz in Treatment-Naive Patients) study compared maraviroc and efavirenz, both with zidovudine-lamivudine, in antiretroviral-naive patients with R5 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. METHODS: Patients screened for R5 HIV-1 were randomized to receive efavirenz (600 mg once daily) or maraviroc (300 mg once or twice daily) with zidovudine-lamivudine. Coprimary end points were proportions of patients with a viral load <400 and <50 copies/mL at week 48; the noninferiority of maraviroc was assessed. RESULTS: The once-daily maraviroc arm was discontinued for not meeting prespecified noninferiority criteria. In the primary 48-week analysis (n = 721), maraviroc was noninferior for <400 copies/mL (70.6% for maraviroc vs 73.1% for efavirenz) but not for <50 copies/mL (65.3% vs 69.3%) at a threshold of -10%. More maraviroc patients discontinued for lack of efficacy (11.9% vs 4.2%), but fewer discontinued for adverse events (4.2% vs 13.6%). In a post hoc reanalysis excluding 107 patients (15%) with non-R5 screening virus by the current, more sensitive tropism assay, the lower bound of the 1-sided 97.5% confidence interval for the difference between treatment groups was above -10% for each end point. CONCLUSIONS: Twice-daily maraviroc was not noninferior to efavirenz at <50 copies/mL in the primary analysis. However, 15% of patients would have been ineligible for inclusion by a more sensitive screening assay. Their retrospective exclusion resulted in similar response rates in both arms Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: (NCT00098293) .

Safety of nateglinide as used in general practice in England: results of a prescription-event monitoring study.

Nateglinide (Starlix((R))) is licensed for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes in patients inadequately controlled with metformin. The study objective was to monitor the safety and use of nateglinide prescribed by primary care physicians (GPs) in England, using the observational cohort technique, Prescription-Event Monitoring. Exposure data were derived from dispensed nateglinide prescriptions issued October 2001-June 2004; demographic and outcome data, from questionnaires sent to patients' GPs at least 6 months after patients' first prescription. Incidence densities (IDs; number of first reports of an event/1,000 patient-months exposure) were calculated for month 1 (ID(1)), months 2-6 (ID(2-6)); rate differences [ID(1)-ID(2-6) (+99% CI)] were examined. Cohort comprised 4,557 patients, median age 60 (IQR 51, 68 years); 2,439 (53.5%) male; 3,463 (76.0%) received nateglinide in combination with metformin. GPs reported 1,625 reasons for stopping in 1,474 (32.3%) patients and 80 events as adverse drug reactions in 66 (1.5%) patients. Events associated with starting treatment included nausea/vomiting [ID(1)-ID(2-6) 9.6 (99% CI 5.3, 13.9)], malaise/lassitude [ID(1)-ID(2-6) 6.03 (99% CI 2.2, 9.9)]. No serious hypersensitivity reactions were reported. Two pregnancies (< 0.1%) and 73 deaths (1.6%) were reported. Nateglinide appeared to be generally well tolerated when used in combination with metformin for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes.