Nasopalatine canal cyst, a diagnostic twist.

We present a case of nasopalatine duct cyst in a 35-yearold female. The cyst was diagnosed based on the presence of only one clinical symptom and no obvious clinical signs, which is a relatively rare occurrence. However, the radiographic and histological presentation of this lesion was typical of a nasopalatine duct cyst. Therefore, this case report aims to highlight the variable presentations of the nasopalatine cyst, which is often misdiagnosed and treated as an endodontic infection.

[Methods of diagnosis of non-specific and specific lymphideniates of the jaw-facial part in children (literature review)].

OBJECTIVE: Introduction: Insufficient basic knowledge on the mechanisms of the multifactoral etiology and pathogenesis of various forms of maxillofacial lymphadenitis of odontogenic and non-odontogenic nature in children causes difficulties in making differential diagnosis. The algorithm of their examination involves a large number of methods, each of which has its own advantages and disadvantages with variable informativeness, depending on the particular situation. The aim: The paper is aimed atfamiliarization of broad medical public with informativeness of diagnostic measures in the nonspecific and specific affection of lymph nodes of the maxillofacial area in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: A thorough comprehensive analysis and generalization of scientific achievements elucidated in the fundamental and periodical publications, relating to diseases of the lymphatic system, has been carried out. RESULTS: Results: It has been establishedthat, despite a large variety of diseases accompanied by the reaction of the lymph nodes of different anatomic localization, current diagnostic possibilities are potent to establish a clinical diagnosis in most cases. In this way, the current diagnostic model requires the interaction of clinicians, infectiologists, molecular biologists, geneticists and morphologists. In this regard, the issues of efficient organization of the diagnostic process, detailing all stages of the search for accurate diagnosis, are crucial. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The collected material on various forms of lymphadenitis and their secondary affection is fragmentary to date due to the absence of the unified methodological approach to carrying out differential diagnosis, which requires generalization and systematization of scientific groundwork. Unfortunately, the algorithms of examination of this category of patients, especially with lymphadenopathy, are not sufficiently developed to date, indicating the need for further search and optimization of diagnostic criteria taking into account modern realities.

Clinical and histopathological features of nasopalatine duct cyst: A 47-year retrospective study and review of current concepts.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and histopathological features of nasopalatine duct cysts (NDCs) stored in the archives of a referred Oral Pathology Service over a 47-year-period, and to review current concepts about these cysts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All NDCs were reviewed, and clinical data were obtained from the patient records. Thirty cases were re-evaluated microscopically by 2 oral pathologists. RESULTS: Among 14,564 cases, 30 (0.20%) were NDCs. Fifteen (50.0%) of the patients were female, and the mean age was 42.7 years. The lesions measured on average 2.37 ± 1.69 cm. Histologically, stratified squamous epithelium, alone or in combination with other epithelia, was present in 13 (46.6%) cases. Goblet cells and subepithelial hyalinization were common. Fourteen (46.6%) cases exhibited a slight degree of inflammation. Nerves were observed in 15 (50%) cases and mucous glands in 7 (23.3%). Hyaline ring granulomas (which is described here for the first time in NDC) and cholesterol crystals were not common. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of clinical-histopathological aspects of NDCs provides more accurate data about their nature and behavior. Our results suggest that the predominant epithelial lining of these cystic lesions is exclusively stratified squamous epithelium or combined with another type. Vessels, nerves, mucous glands and inflammatory infiltrate are frequently observed.

Differences in clinical manifestations of odontogenic and non-odontogenic lymphadenitis.

INTRODUCTION: The acute suppurative lymphadenitis and its chronic forms prevail in the structure of inflammatory processes of the maxillofacial area in children. High incidence of the acute and chronic forms of lymphadenitis of both odontogenic and nonodontogenic origin is caused by the anotomophysiological peculiarities of the structure of the teeth and soft tissues in children in different age periods. THE AIM: The paper was aimed at comparison of clinical manifestations of the acute and chronic odontogenic and non-odontogenic lymphadenitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The results of the checkup and 5-year-period treatment of 324 children with the acute and chronic forms of the nonspecific lymphadenitis of the maxilifacial area have been used. Four study groups have been formed. The first and the second group included 16 (38,0%) and 26 (62%) children with the acute submandibular suppurative lymphadenitis of the odontogenic and nonodontogenic origin, respectively. 12 (35,3%) and 22 (64,7) individuals with chronic hyperplastic lymphadenitis have been assigned to the third and the fourth group, respectively. RESULTS: The clinical course of the acute submandibular suppurative lymphadenitis of various etiologies is different. Rapid development of the local clinical manifestations with its dramatic progressing is specific to odontogenic lymphadenitis. Its clinical course is characterized by the more apparent overall response of the body, increase of the body temperature, and these symptoms are more manifested than in nonodontogenic lymphadenitis. The clinical course of chronic hyperplastic lymphadenitis is accompanied by the enlarged regional lymph nodes of various size and shapes and dense-elastic consistency. Clinical manifestations of nonodontogenic lymphadenitis were less apparent and the overall sate was normal in both forms of lymphadenitis. CONCLUSIONS: Nonodontogenic lymphadenitis prevailed in all nosological forms of the acute and chronic nonspecific lymphadenitis.

Nonodontogenic Cysts of the Jaws and Treatment in the Pediatric Population.

Nonodontogenic cysts within the jaws are not a common presentation in the pediatric population. Cysts within the pediatric population tend to be developmental and odontogenic in nature. Although nonodontogenic cysts of the jaws are relatively uncommon, it is imperative the clinician understand their clinical behavior and management because failure to do so can result in increased patient morbidity. The nonodontogenic cysts of the jaws that are most often encountered are the central giant cell granuloma, traumatic bone cavity, aneurysmal bone cyst, nasopalatine duct cyst, and nasolabial cyst. This article reviews common clinical findings, radiographic features, histopathologic features, and current treatments of nonodontogenic cysts.

A rare case of bilateral nasolabial cysts.

Nasolabial cysts are rare non-odontogenic cystic lesions representing around 0.7% of all maxillofacial cysts. They usually present as unilateral painless swellings, sometimes with epiphora and dacryocystitis as well as pain in cases of rapid growth or infection. We have reviewed the literature and present an extremely rare case of bilateral nasolabial cysts in a young Afro-Caribbean man presenting with chronic nasal blockage, epiphora and rhinorrhoea. We describe our successful surgical management using a sublabial approach for complete excision, leading to a disease-free outcome at 6 months follow-up. Other modalities have been described, from endoscopic marsupialisation to simple aspiration. However, with the exception of complete surgical excision, all other surgical techniques are associated with a high recurrence rate. We therefore advocate complete surgical excision as described below for optimal results.

Estudo epidemiológico, clínico e imaginológico das lesões ósseas dos maxilares / Epidemiological, clinical and imaginologic study of bone lesions of the jaws

Introdução. O cirurgião-dentista é na maioria das vezes, o responsável pelo diagnóstico e tratamento das lesões ósseas dos maxilares. O diagnóstico é decisivo na conduta terapêutica a ser seguida. Na literatura, análises retrospectivas são vistas com maior frequência, onde foram coletados resultados de exames histopatológicos. Contudo, para algumas lesões, o diagnóstico é clínico e radiográfico, não sendo indicada a realização de biópsia. Objetivo. O objetivo deste estudo foi descrever a prevalência das lesões ósseas dos maxilares, assim como avaliar suas características clínicas e radiográficas. Correlacionar a principal hipótese diagnóstica com o diagnóstico final. Pacientes e Métodos. Estudo com 130 pacientes com lesões ósseas dos maxilares diagnosticadas no Centro de Diagnóstico Oral da Disciplina de Estomatologia Clínica da Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo (CDO-FOUSP), entre Agosto de 2013 e Outubro de 2014. Os pacientes foram divididos em 4 grupos: 1: Tumores benignos odontogênicos e não odontogênicos. 2: Cistos odontogênicos e não odontogênicos. 3: Tumores malignos. 4: Outras lesões. Análise estatística foi realizada buscando estabelecer informações relevantes quanto aos dados epidemiológicos, clínicos e radiográficos destas lesões. Resultados. A idade média foi de 35,2 anos ±17,86, (variou entre 8 e 77 anos). Dos 130 pacientes, 71 eram mulheres (54,62%) e 87 leucodermas (66,92%). A mandíbula foi mais acometida (71,43%), do que a maxila (28,57%). As características clínicas mais observadas foram: aumento de volume em 60 casos (42,85%), dor em 38 (27,14%) e 16 casos (11,43%) apresentaram drenagem de secreção purulenta. O exame complementar de imagem mais utilizado foi a radiografia panorâmica, 124 exames (88,57%).

Em 47 lesões (33,57%), o diagnóstico foi realizado através do exame clínico, radiográfico e conduta cirúrgica (displasias ósseas, cistos ósseos simples, escleroses ósseas, dentre outras). Lesões com imagens radiolúcidas representaram 89 casos (63,57%), a forma unilocular esteve presente em 114 casos (81,43%) e 101 lesões (72,14%) apresentaram relação com o ápice dental. Dos casos que houve análise histopatológica (93 casos), o cisto periapical foi a lesão mais frequente totalizando 38 casos, 12 cistos dentígeros, 9 odontomas (7 compostos e 2 complexos), 8 TOQ, 6 cistos residuais, 5 ameloblastomas, e outras lesões. Houve 3 casos de tumores malignos, sendo 1 osteossarcoma, 1 carcinoma mucoepidermóide e 1 mieloma múltiplo. O percentual de acerto entre a principal hipótese diagnóstica com o diagnóstico final foi de 76,82%. Conclusões. Lesões ósseas foram frequentes e representaram aproximadamente 30% das primeiras consultas. Lesões com características radiográficas radiolúcidas e uniloculares foram as mais frequentes. Em um terço dos casos, não foi indicado (necessário) o exame histopatológico para a conclusão do diagnóstico. Sendo utilizadas as informações clínicas, radiográficas e abordagem cirúrgica (casos de cisto ósseo simples).

Introduction. The dentist is the main professional responsible for the diagnosis and treatment of bone lesions of the jaws. The diagnosis is crucial to therapeutic decision. In the literature, retrospective analyzes are more frequents, and the data are collected from histopathological exams. However, for some lesions, the diagnosis is clinical and radiographic, and the biopsy is not indicated. Objective. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of bone lesions of the jaws, and evaluate its clinical and radiographic features. In addition, the correlation between the main diagnosis and the final diagnosis was performed. Patients and Methods. A study which evaluated a total of 130 patients with bone lesions of the jaws. All cases were diagnosed in Oral Diagnosis Center of the Stomatology Discipline, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo (CDO-FOUSP), between August 2013 and October 2014. Patients were divided into 4 groups: 1: Benign odontogenic and non odontogenic tumors. 2: Odontogenic and non odontogenic cysts. 3: Malignant tumors. 4: Other lesions. Statistical analysis was performed to establish relevant information on the epidemiological, clinical and radiographic data of these lesions. Results. The mean age of the patients was 35,2 years ± 17.86 (range, 8 to 77 years). Among 130 patients, 71 were women (54.62%) and 87 were Caucasians (66.92%).

The mandible was more affected (71.43%) than the maxilla (28.57%). The most frequent clinical signs were swelling in 60 cases (42.85%), pain in 38 (27.14%) and 16 cases (11.43%) showed purulent drainage. The panoramic radiograph was the most used imaging exam, 124 exams (88.57%). In 47 lesions (33.57%), the diagnosis was done by clinical examination, radiographic and surgical management (bone dysplasia, simple bone cysts, bone sclerosis, and others). Radiolucent lesions accounted for 89 cases (63.57%), the unilocular form was present in 114 cases (81.43%) and 101 lesions (72.14%) were related to the dental apex. A total of 93 cases had histopathological analyses; periapical cyst was the most frequent lesion, representing 38 cases, 12 dentigerous cysts, 9 odontomas (7 compounds and 2 complexes), 8 OKT, 6 residual cysts, 5 ameloblastomas and other lesions. There were 3 malignant tumors, 1 osteosarcoma, 1 mucoepidermoid carcinoma and 1 multiple myeloma. The correlation between the main diagnosis hypotheses with a final diagnosis showed a success rate of 76.82%. Conclusions. Bone lesions were frequent and represented approximately 30% of the first visit patients. Lesions that presented radiolucent and unilocular radiograph pattern were the most frequent. In one third of cases, it was not indicated (necessary) the histopathological examination to conclude the diagnosis. Being used data of clinical, radiographic and surgical approach (cases of simple bone cyst).

Nonodontogenic mandibular lesions: differentiation based on CT attenuation.

Mandibular lesions are classified as odontogenic and nonodontogenic based on the cell of origin. Odontogenic lesions are frequently encountered at head and neck imaging. However, several nonodontogenic pathologies may also involve mandible and present further diagnostic dilemma. Awareness of the imaging features of nonodontogenic lesions is crucial in order to guide clinicians in proper patient management. Computed tomography (CT) may provide key information to narrow diagnostic considerations. Nonodontogenic mandibular lesions may have lytic, sclerotic, ground-glass, or mixed lytic and sclerotic appearances on CT. In this article, our aim is to present various nonodontogenic lesions of the mandible by categorizing them according to their attenuations on CT.

Nasopalatine duct cyst, a delayed complication to successful dental implant placement: diagnosis and surgical management.

The dental literature reports frequently on both the success and survival of dental implants, whereby the focus remains on the biological response of hard and soft tissue to the implants. The predication and anticipation of adverse implant events can then lead to the preemption of implant loss. However, biological situations can arise that are outside the control of the clinician. The author reports a case history of the late manifestation of a nasopalatine duct cyst in close proximity to a dental implant and its subsequent surgical management.

A clinical report demonstrating the significance of distinguishing a nasopalatine duct cyst from a radicular cyst.

Endodontic diagnosis is challenging and depends on the organisation of information from the patient history, clinical examination and analysis of the pulp, radiographic and histopathological assessment. A 35-year-old man was endodontically treated for radiolucency in relation to the roots of maxillary central incisors as it was a provisionally diagnosed case of radicular cyst. Since the palatal swelling persisted, the lesion was re-evaluated using relevant diagnostic aids and a diagnosis of nasopalatine duct cyst (NPDC) was made, which was missed during the initial assessment. An erroneous interpretation of cystic radiolucency in relation to maxillary central incisors can often lead to inappropriate treatment planning. This case highlights the relevant aspects in the diagnosis of NPDC when it is mistaken for a radicular cyst and emphasises the need for thorough clinical examination and relevant investigations for periapical radiolucencies of questionable origin before initiating endodontic therapy.

Nonendodontic lesions misdiagnosed as apical periodontitis lesions: series of case reports and review of literature.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to analyze cases referred from a reference service in oral pathology that were initially misdiagnosed as periapical lesions of endodontic origin and to perform a review of the literature regarding lesions located in the apical area of teeth with a nonendodontic source. METHODS: A survey was made of clinical cases derived from the service of oral pathology from 2002 to 2012. The pertinent literature was also reviewed using ScienceDirect and PubMed databases. The lesions were grouped into benign lesions mimicking endodontic periapical lesions (BLMEPLs), malignant lesions mimicking endodontic periapical lesions (MLMEPLs), and Stafne bone cavities. The clinical presentations were divided into lesions with swelling without pain, lesions with swelling and pain, and lesions without swelling but presenting with pain. RESULTS: The results showed that 66% (37/56) of cases represented benign lesions, 29% (16/56) malignant lesions, and 5% (3/56) Stafne bone cavities. The most commonly reported BLMEPLs were ameloblastomas (21%) followed by nasopalatine duct cysts (13.5%). The most frequently cited MLMEPLs were metastatic injuries (31.5%) followed by carcinomas (25%). The main clinical presentation of BLMEPLs was pain, whereas that of MLMEPLs was swelling associated with pain; Stafne bone cavities displayed particular clinical findings. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and radiologic aspects as well as the analysis of the patients' medical history, pulp vitality tests, and aspiration are essential tools for developing a correct diagnosis of periapical lesions of endodontic origin. However, if the instruments mentioned earlier indicate a lesion of nonendodontic origin, a biopsy and subsequent histopathological analysis are mandatory.

Differential diagnosis of antral pseudocyst. A case report.

Antral pseudocyst (AP) is a process formed by the inflammatory exudate accumulation below the sinuses mucous membrane and causing a sessile elevation. AP is a dome-shaped, well-delineate, faintly radiopaque lesion on the intact floor of the maxillary sinus. A case of AP with an unusual location is presented. A 24-year-old male was submitted to the panoramic radiographic exam and an around, well-defined, faintly radiopaque lesion was detected in the tuberosity extension of maxillary sinus. The differential clinical-radiograph diagnoses were AP, non-odontogenic cysts, odontogenic cysts, odontogenic and non-odontogenic tumours. Fine needle aspiration demonstrated presence of viscous yellow liquid. It was performed an excisional biopsy and the histological diagnosis was AP. It is necessary biopsy when this doubt persists and also emphasize the recognition of AP in other differential diagnose and management with other lesions in region of the maxillary sinus.

Misdiagnosis of a nasopalatine duct cyst: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Nonendodontic lesions misdiagnosed as pathoses of endodontic origin are often referenced in the literature. One of the most frequent nonodontogenic cysts of the oral cavity, the nasopalatine duct cyst (NPDC), can be misdiagnosed as endodontic in nature. METHODS: A case is presented in which a patent NPDC was originally diagnosed as a sinus tract with subsequent endodontic nonsurgical retreatment and eventual extraction before endodontic consultation. RESULTS: After surgical treatment, a histopathologic diagnosis of an NPDC was confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: If diagnosed incorrectly, inappropriate endodontic treatment of a NPDC may be initiated to include unnecessary extraction. An increased understanding of anatomy, the use of appropriate diagnostic tests to include cone-beam computed tomography imaging, and key examination techniques to distinguish endodontic lesions from nonendodontic pathoses are imperative for an accurate differential diagnosis and appropriate treatment outcome.

Diagnosis and surgical management of nasopalatine duct cysts.

Nasopalatine duct cyst also known as nasopalatine cyst is a developmental, epithelial, non-neoplastic cyst that is considered to be the most common nonodontogenic cyst in the maxillofacial region. It is one of the many pathologic processes that may occur within the jaw bones, but it is unique in that it develops in only a single location--in the midline anterior maxilla. Nasopalatine cysts are usually asymptomatic and may be discovered during routine clinical and/or radiologic examination. The current study reports 18 cases of nasopalatine duct cyst that were diagnosed and treated at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Ramadi Teaching Hospital, Anbar Province, Iraq. A correct diagnosis can only be made after proper clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic examination.

An unusual case of nasopalatine cyst in Brazilian population / Um caso incomum de cisto nasopalatino na população brasileira

The nasopalatine duct cyst (NPDC) is the most common non-odontogenic cyst typically found in middle-aged Caucasian female in Brazil, however the present report describes a case in a 35 year-old black male. NPDC are usually asymptomatic and are discovered incidentally during routine radiological examination. A cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a valuable tool to localize a cyst within the nasopalatine canal. CBCT enables analysis of the dimension of the NPDC, analysis of the involvement of neighboring anatomical structures and assists in treatment planning. The authors at this case highlight the importance of clinical examination with an unbiased view of age, gender and ethnicity.

O cisto do ducto nasopalatino (CDNP) é o mais comum dos cistos não-odontogênicos geralmente encontrado em mulheres brancas de meia idade no Brasil, embora o presente relato descreva um caso em um homem negro de 35 anos de idade. Os CDNP são usualmente assintomáticos e são descobertos acidentalmente durante o exame radiográfico de rotina. A tomografia computadorizada por feixe cônico(TCFC) é uma ferramenta válida para localizar o cisto dentro do canal nasopalatino. A TCFC permite análise da dimensão do CDNP, análise do envolvimento das estruturas anatômicas vizinhas e auxilia no planejamento do tratamento. Os autores neste caso alertam para a importância do exame clinico, com uma visão embasada na idade, gênero e grupo étnico.

Minimally invasive surgical approach in a large mandibular solitary cyst: case report and review of the literature.

Solitary bone cyst (SBC) is an intraosseus radiolucent lesions that defers from real cysts for the fact that peripheral epithelial lining is totally absent. It could be classified as a psudocyst and occurs most frequently in young patients. In most cases SBC doesn't cause symptoms and it is often diagnosed accidentally during routine radiographic examination. A right diagnosis of this disease is also complicated because there are no pathognomonic radiographic signs and symptoms: so this form of pseudocyst is often misdiagnosed as a common odontogenic cyst. Despite numerous studies, the pathogenesis of the SBC is not yet established: the most widely accepted theory is that it could be the result of an intramedullary necrosis determined by a trauma. In this article we report a case of SBC in child treated with a minimal surgical approach. This new kind of treatment is much more conservative than the traditional one, it can be performed as outpatients, under local anesthesia and with few postoperative discomfort: For these reasons this minimal invasive technique appears to be particulary suitable for pediatric patients.