Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 64
Filtrar
1.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1222, 2024 May 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702667

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Seasonal influenza epidemics have a substantial public health and economic burden, which can be alleviated through vaccination. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a 75% vaccination coverage rate (VCR) in: older adults (aged ≥ 65 years), individuals with chronic conditions, pregnant women, children aged 6-24 months and healthcare workers. However, no European country achieves this target in all risk groups. In this study, potential public health and economic benefits achieved by reaching 75% influenza VCR was estimated in risk groups across four European countries: France, Italy, Spain, and the UK. METHODS: A static epidemiological model was used to estimate the averted public health and economic burden of increasing the 2021/2022 season VCR to 75%, using the efficacy data of standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine. For each country and risk group, the most recent data on population size, VCR, pre-pandemic influenza epidemiology, direct medical costs and absenteeism were identified through a systematic literature review, supplemented by manual searching. Outcomes were: averted influenza cases, general practitioner (GP) visits, hospitalisations, case fatalities, number of days of work lost, direct medical costs and absenteeism-related costs. RESULTS: As of the 2021/2022 season, the UK achieved the highest weighted VCR across risk groups (65%), followed by Spain (47%), France (44%) and Italy (44%). Based on modelling, the 2021/2022 VCR prevented an estimated 1.9 million influenza cases, avoiding 375,200 GP visits, 73,200 hospitalisations and 38,400 deaths. To achieve the WHO 75% VCR target, an additional 24 million at-risk individuals would need to be vaccinated, most of which being older adults and patients with chronic conditions. It was estimated that this could avoid a further 918,200 influenza cases, 332,000 GP visits, 16,300 hospitalisations and 6,300 deaths across the four countries, with older adults accounting for 52% of hospitalisations and 80% of deaths. An additional €84 million in direct medical costs and €79 million in absenteeism costs would be saved in total, with most economic benefits delivered in France. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults represent most vaccine-preventable influenza cases and deaths, followed by individuals with chronic conditions. Health authorities should prioritise vaccinating these populations for maximum public health and economic benefits.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Saúde Pública , Humanos , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Influenza Humana/economia , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Influenza/economia , Idoso , Feminino , Saúde Pública/economia , Adulto , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Espanha/epidemiologia , Itália/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pré-Escolar , França/epidemiologia , Masculino , Estações do Ano , Adolescente , Lactente , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem , Criança , Gravidez , Vacinação/economia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura Vacinal/economia
2.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11929, 2024 05 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38789451

RESUMO

Italy implemented two-dose universal varicella vaccination (UVV) regionally from 2003 to 2013 and nationally from 2017 onwards. Our objective was to analyze regional disparities in varicella outcomes resulting from disparities in vaccine coverage rates (VCRs) projected over a 50-year time-horizon (2020-2070). A previously published dynamic transmission model was updated to quantify the potential public health impact of the UVV program in Italy at the national and regional levels. Four 2-dose vaccine strategies utilizing monovalent (V) and quadrivalent (MMRV) vaccines were evaluated for each region: (A) MMRV-MSD/MMRV-MSD, (B) MMRV-GSK/MMRV-GSK, (C) V-MSD/MMRV-MSD, and (D) V-GSK/MMRV-GSK. Costs were reported in 2022 Euros. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were discounted 3% annually. Under strategy A, the three regions with the lowest first-dose VCR reported increased varicella cases (+ 34.3%), hospitalizations (+ 20.0%), QALYs lost (+ 5.9%), payer costs (+ 22.2%), and societal costs (+ 14.6%) over the 50-year time-horizon compared to the three regions with highest first-dose VCR. Regions with low first-dose VCR were more sensitive to changes in VCR than high first-dose VCR regions. Results with respect to second-dose VCR were qualitatively similar, although smaller in magnitude. Results were similar across all vaccine strategies.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Varicela , Varicela , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Vacina contra Varicela/economia , Varicela/epidemiologia , Varicela/prevenção & controle , Varicela/economia , Cobertura Vacinal/economia , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Pré-Escolar , Vacinação/economia , Masculino , Adolescente , Lactente , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Programas de Imunização/economia
3.
Health Policy Plan ; 39(6): 583-592, 2024 Jun 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38590052

RESUMO

Many children do not receive a full schedule of childhood vaccines, yet there is limited evidence on the cost-effectiveness of strategies for improving vaccination coverage. Evidence is even scarcer on the cost-effectiveness of strategies for reaching 'zero-dose children', who have not received any routine vaccines. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of periodic intensification of routine immunization (PIRI), a widely applied strategy for increasing vaccination coverage. We focused on Intensified Mission Indradhanush (IMI), a large-scale PIRI intervention implemented in India in 2017-2018. In 40 sampled districts, we measured the incremental economic cost of IMI using primary data, and used controlled interrupted time-series regression to estimate the incremental vaccination doses delivered. We estimated deaths and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted using the Lives Saved Tool and reported cost-effectiveness from immunization programme and societal perspectives. We found that, in sampled districts, IMI had an estimated incremental cost of 2021US$13.7 (95% uncertainty interval: 10.6 to 17.4) million from an immunization programme perspective and increased vaccine delivery by an estimated 2.2 (-0.5 to 4.8) million doses over a 12-month period, averting an estimated 1413 (-350 to 3129) deaths. The incremental cost from a programme perspective was $6.21 per dose ($2.80 to dominated), $82.99 per zero-dose child reached ($39.85 to dominated), $327.63 ($147.65 to dominated) per DALY averted, $360.72 ($162.56 to dominated) per life-year saved and $9701.35 ($4372.01 to dominated) per under-5 death averted. At a cost-effectiveness threshold of 1× per-capita GDP per DALY averted, IMI was estimated to be cost-effective with 90% probability. This evidence suggests IMI was both impactful and cost-effective for improving vaccination coverage, though there is a high degree of uncertainty in the results. As vaccination programmes expand coverage, unit costs may increase due to the higher costs of reaching currently unvaccinated children.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Programas de Imunização , Cobertura Vacinal , Humanos , Índia , Programas de Imunização/economia , Cobertura Vacinal/economia , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Lactente , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Deficiência , Pré-Escolar , Vacinação/economia , Vacinas/economia , Esquemas de Imunização
4.
Nature ; 627(8004): 612-619, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38480877

RESUMO

Less than 30% of people in Africa received a dose of the COVID-19 vaccine even 18 months after vaccine development1. Here, motivated by the observation that residents of remote, rural areas of Sierra Leone faced severe access difficulties2, we conducted an intervention with last-mile delivery of doses and health professionals to the most inaccessible areas, along with community mobilization. A cluster randomized controlled trial in 150 communities showed that this intervention with mobile vaccination teams increased the immunization rate by about 26 percentage points within 48-72 h. Moreover, auxiliary populations visited our community vaccination points, which more than doubled the number of inoculations administered. The additional people vaccinated per intervention site translated to an implementation cost of US $33 per person vaccinated. Transportation to reach remote villages accounted for a large share of total intervention costs. Therefore, bundling multiple maternal and child health interventions in the same visit would further reduce costs per person treated. Current research on vaccine delivery maintains a large focus on individual behavioural issues such as hesitancy. Our study demonstrates that prioritizing mobile services to overcome access difficulties faced by remote populations in developing countries can generate increased returns in terms of uptake of health services3.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Vacinação em Massa , Unidades Móveis de Saúde , Serviços de Saúde Rural , Cobertura Vacinal , Criança , Humanos , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/métodos , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/organização & administração , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra COVID-19/economia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/provisão & distribuição , Unidades Móveis de Saúde/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde Rural/organização & administração , Serra Leoa , Meios de Transporte/economia , Cobertura Vacinal/economia , Cobertura Vacinal/métodos , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Hesitação Vacinal , Vacinação em Massa/métodos , Vacinação em Massa/organização & administração , Feminino , Adulto , Mães
6.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 21(1): 771, 2021 Nov 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34781905

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Maternal immunisation is an essential public health intervention aimed at improving the health outcomes for pregnant women and providing protection to the newborn. Despite international recommendations, safety and efficacy data for the intervention, and often a fully funded program, uptake of vaccines in pregnancy remain suboptimal. One possible explanation for this includes limited access to vaccination services at the point of antenatal care. The aim of this study is to evaluate the change in vaccine coverage among pregnant women following implementation of a modified model of delivery aimed at improving access at the point of antenatal care, including an economic evaluation. METHODS: This prospective multi-centre study, using action research design, across six maternity services in Victoria, Australia, evaluated the implementation of a co-designed vaccine delivery model (either a pharmacy led model, midwife led model or primary care led model) supported by provider education. The main outcome measure was influenza and pertussis vaccine uptake during pregnancy and the incremental cost of the new model (compared to existing models) and the cost-effectiveness of the new model at each participating health service. RESULTS: Influenza vaccine coverage in 2019 increased between 50 and 196% from baseline. All services reduced their average cost per immunisation under the new platforms due to efficiencies achieved in the delivery of maternal immunisations. This cost saving ranged from $9 to $71. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that there is no 'one size fits all' model of vaccine delivery. Future successful strategies to improve maternal vaccine coverage at other maternity services should be site specific, multifaceted, targeted at the existing barriers to maternal vaccine uptake, and heavily involve local stakeholders in the design and implementation of these strategies. The cost-effectiveness analysis indicates that an increase in maternal influenza immunisation uptake can be achieved at a relatively modest cost through amendment of maternal immunisation platforms.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Vacinas contra Influenza , Serviços de Saúde Materna , Vacina contra Coqueluche , Cobertura Vacinal/métodos , Austrália , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Cobertura Vacinal/economia , Cobertura Vacinal/tendências , Vitória
7.
Int J Cancer ; 149(12): 1997-2009, 2021 12 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34363620

RESUMO

The WHO has launched a global strategy to eliminate cervical cancer through the scale-up of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, cervical screening, and cervical cancer treatment. Malaysia has achieved high-coverage HPV vaccination since 2010, but coverage of the existing cytology-based program remains low. Pilot studies found HPV self-sampling was acceptable and effective, with high follow-up rates when a digital registry was used, and recently the Malaysian Government announced plans for a national HPV-based screening program. We therefore evaluated the impact of primary HPV screening with self-collection in Malaysia in the context of Malaysia's existing vaccination program. We used the "Policy1-Cervix" modeling platform to assess health outcomes, cost-effectiveness, resource use and cervical cancer elimination timing (the year when cervical cancer rates reach four cases per 100 000 women) of implementing primary HPV testing with self-collection, assuming 70% routine-screening coverage could be achieved. Based on available data, we assumed that compliance with follow-up was 90% when a digital registry was used, but that compliance with follow-up would be 50-75% without the use of a digital registry. We found that the current vaccination program would prevent 27 000 to 32 200 cervical cancer cases and 11 700 to 14 000 deaths by 2070. HPV testing with a digital registry was cost-effective (CER = $US 6953-7549 < $US 11 373[<1×GDP per capita]) and could prevent an additional 15 900 to 17 800 cases and 9700 to 10 600 deaths by 2070, expediting national elimination by 11 to 20 years, to 2055 to 2059. If HPV screening were implemented without a digital registry, there would be 1800 to 4900 fewer deaths averted by 2070 and the program would be less cost-effective. These results underline the importance of HPV testing as a key elimination pillar in Malaysia.


Assuntos
Erradicação de Doenças/organização & administração , Programas de Rastreamento/organização & administração , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Cobertura Vacinal/organização & administração , Alphapapillomavirus/isolamento & purificação , Colo do Útero/patologia , Colo do Útero/virologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Erradicação de Doenças/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Malásia/epidemiologia , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Cobertura Vacinal/economia
8.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 634, 2021 Jul 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34215215

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The introduction of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has resulted in a remarkable decline of genital warts in women and men, but in Germany historical rates of vaccination are relatively low. We report long-term surveillance data on changes in HPV 6 and HPV 11 infection and the prevalence of genital warts in young women in the Wolfsburg HPV epidemiological study (WOLVES). METHODS: Women born in 1983/84, 1988/89, and 1993/94 participated in four cohorts between 2009/10 and 2014/15. Quadrivalent vaccination coverage and prevalence of HPV 6/11 infection and genital warts are reported for participants aged 19-22 years and 24-27 years at the time of sample collection. Statistical analyses were done to compare similarly aged participants using 2 × 2 contingency tables (Röhmel-Mansmann unconditional exact test; two-side alpha of 0.05). RESULTS: A total of 2456 women were recruited. Between 2010 and 2015, there was a statistically significant decrease in the prevalence of HPV 6 infection among women aged 24-27 years (2.1% versus 0.0%; P < 0.0001) and women aged 19-22 years (2.0% versus 0.0%; P = 0.0056). There was no significant decline in HPV 11 infection. In total, 52 of 2341 participants were diagnosed with genital warts. There was a statistically significant drop in the risk of developing genital warts in women aged 24-27 years between 2010 and 2015 (4.7% versus 1.7%, respectively; P = 0.0018). The overall risk of developing genital warts in women aged 19-27 years decreased from 3.1% in 2010 to 1.2% in 2015 (P = 0.0022). CONCLUSIONS: An increase in vaccination coverage was associated with a decreased prevalence of genital warts in young women. A protective effect greater than herd immunity alone was seen despite low vaccination rates. Quadrivalent vaccine had a protective effect on genital HPV 6 infection and an almost fully protective effect on the development of genital warts in the youngest population.


Assuntos
Condiloma Acuminado/epidemiologia , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Cobertura Vacinal/economia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Papillomaviridae/imunologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/economia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
9.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 118(13)2021 03 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33758096

RESUMO

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a serious threat to global public health. However, vaccinations have been largely undervalued as a method to hinder AMR progression. This study examined the AMR impact of increasing pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) coverage in China. China has one of the world's highest rates of antibiotic use and low PCV coverage. We developed an agent-based DREAMR (Dynamic Representation of the Economics of AMR) model to examine the health and economic benefits of slowing AMR against commonly used antibiotics. We simulated PCV coverage, pneumococcal infections, antibiotic use, and AMR accumulation. Four antibiotics to treat pneumococcal diseases (penicillin, amoxicillin, third-generation cephalosporins, and meropenem) were modeled with antibiotic utilization, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics factored into predicting AMR accumulation. Three PCV coverage scenarios were simulated over 5 y: 1) status quo with no change in coverage, 2) scaled coverage increase to 99% in 5 y, and 3) accelerated coverage increase to 85% over 2 y followed by 3 y to reach 99% coverage. Compared to the status quo, we found that AMR against penicillin, amoxicillin, and third-generation cephalosporins was significantly reduced by 6.6%, 10.9%, and 9.8% in the scaled scenario and by 10.5%, 17.0%, and 15.4% in the accelerated scenario. Cumulative costs due to AMR, including direct and indirect costs to patients and caretakers, were reduced by $371 million in the scaled and $586 million in the accelerated scenarios compared to the status quo. AMR-reducing benefits of vaccines are essential to quantify in order to drive appropriate investment.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação em Massa/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Pré-Escolar , China/epidemiologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Vacinação em Massa/economia , Modelos Econômicos , Infecções Pneumocócicas/economia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/mortalidade , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/economia , Cobertura Vacinal/economia , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas Conjugadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Conjugadas/economia
13.
Value Health ; 24(1): 70-77, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33431156

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Understanding the level of investment needed for the 2021-2030 decade is important as the global community faces the next strategic period for vaccines and immunization programs. To assist with this goal, we estimated the aggregate costs of immunization programs for ten vaccines in 94 low- and middle-income countries from 2011 to 2030. METHOD: We calculated vaccine, immunization delivery and stockpile costs for 94 low- and middle-income countries leveraging the latest available data sources. We conducted scenario analyses to vary assumptions about the relationship between delivery cost and coverage as well as vaccine prices for fully self-financing countries. RESULTS: The total aggregate cost of immunization programs in 94 countries for 10 vaccines from 2011 to 2030 is $70.8 billion (confidence interval: $56.6-$93.3) under the base case scenario and $84.1 billion ($72.8-$102.7) under an incremental delivery cost scenario, with an increasing trend over two decades. The relative proportion of vaccine and delivery costs for pneumococcal conjugate, human papillomavirus, and rotavirus vaccines increase as more countries introduce these vaccines. Nine countries in accelerated transition phase bear the highest burden of the costs in the next decade, and uncertainty with vaccine prices for the 17 fully self-financing countries could lead to total costs that are 1.3-13.1 times higher than the base case scenario. CONCLUSION: Resource mobilization efforts at the global and country levels will be needed to reach the level of investment needed for the coming decade. Global-level initiatives and targeted strategies for transitioning countries will help ensure the sustainability of immunization programs.


Assuntos
Países em Desenvolvimento/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Global , Programas de Imunização/economia , Programas de Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura Vacinal/economia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Custos e Análise de Custo , Países em Desenvolvimento/economia , Recursos em Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Modelos Econômicos , Vacinas/economia , Vacinas/provisão & distribuição
14.
Value Health ; 24(1): 78-85, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33431157

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Vaccination has prevented millions of deaths and cases of disease in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). During the Decade of Vaccines (2011-2020), international organizations, including the World Health Organization and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, focused on new vaccine introduction and expanded coverage of existing vaccines. As Gavi, other organizations, and country governments look to the future, we aimed to estimate the economic benefits of immunization programs made from 2011 to 2020 and potential gains in the future decade. METHODS: We used estimates of cases and deaths averted by vaccines against 10 pathogens in 94 LMICs to estimate the economic value of immunization. We applied 3 approaches-cost of illness averted (COI), value of statistical life (VSL), and value of statistical life-year (VSLY)-to estimate observable and unobservable economic benefits between 2011 and 2030. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2030, immunization would avert $1510.4 billion ($674.3-$2643.2 billion) (2018 USD) in costs of illness in the 94 modeled countries, compared with the counterfactual of no vaccination. Using the VSL approach, immunization would generate $3436.7 billion ($1615.8-$5657.2 billion) in benefits. Applying the VSLY approach, $5662.7 billion ($2547.2-$9719.4) in benefits would be generated. CONCLUSION: Vaccination has generated significant economic benefits in LMICs in the past decade. To reach predicted levels of economic benefits, countries and international donor organizations need to meet coverage projections outlined in the Gavi Operational Forecast. Estimates generated using the COI, VSL, or VSLY approach may be strategically used by donor agencies, decision makers, and advocates to inform investment cases and advocacy campaigns.


Assuntos
Países em Desenvolvimento/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Imunização/economia , Programas de Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura Vacinal/economia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Custos e Análise de Custo , Países em Desenvolvimento/economia , Saúde Global , Humanos , Modelos Econômicos , Vacinas/economia , Vacinas/provisão & distribuição
15.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 117(50): 31954-31962, 2020 12 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33229566

RESUMO

Canine distemper virus (CDV) has recently emerged as an extinction threat for the endangered Amur tiger (Panthera tigris altaica). CDV is vaccine-preventable, and control strategies could require vaccination of domestic dogs and/or wildlife populations. However, vaccination of endangered wildlife remains controversial, which has led to a focus on interventions in domestic dogs, often assumed to be the source of infection. Effective decision making requires an understanding of the true reservoir dynamics, which poses substantial challenges in remote areas with diverse host communities. We carried out serological, demographic, and phylogenetic studies of dog and wildlife populations in the Russian Far East to show that a number of wildlife species are more important than dogs, both in maintaining CDV and as sources of infection for tigers. Critically, therefore, because CDV circulates among multiple wildlife sources, dog vaccination alone would not be effective at protecting tigers. We show, however, that low-coverage vaccination of tigers themselves is feasible and would produce substantive reductions in extinction risks. Vaccination of endangered wildlife provides a valuable component of conservation strategies for endangered species.


Assuntos
Cinomose/prevenção & controle , Espécies em Perigo de Extinção/economia , Tigres/virologia , Vacinação/economia , Vacinas Virais/administração & dosagem , Animais , Animais Selvagens/virologia , Tomada de Decisões Gerenciais , Reservatórios de Doenças/veterinária , Reservatórios de Doenças/virologia , Cinomose/epidemiologia , Cinomose/transmissão , Cinomose/virologia , Vírus da Cinomose Canina/genética , Vírus da Cinomose Canina/imunologia , Cães/sangue , Cães/virologia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Masculino , Modelos Econômicos , Filogenia , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Sibéria , Tigres/sangue , Vacinação/métodos , Cobertura Vacinal/economia , Cobertura Vacinal/métodos , Cobertura Vacinal/organização & administração , Vacinas Virais/economia
16.
Value Health ; 23(7): 891-897, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32762991

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In many countries, measles disproportionately affects poorer households. To achieve equitable delivery, national immunization programs can use 2 main delivery platforms: routine immunization and supplementary immunization activities (SIAs). The objective of this article is to use data concerning measles vaccination coverage delivered via routine and SIA strategies to make inferences about the associated equity impact. METHODS: We relied on Demographic and Health Survey and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys multi-country survey data to conduct a comparative analysis of routine and SIA measles vaccination status of children by wealth quintile. We estimated the value of the angle, θ, for the ratio of the difference between coverage levels of adjacent wealth quintiles by using the arc-tangent formula. For each country/year observation, we averaged the θ estimates into one summary measurement, defined as the "equity impact number." RESULTS: Across 20 countries, the equity impact number summarized across wealth quintiles was greater (and hence less equitable) for routine delivery than for SIAs in the survey rounds (years) during, before, and after an SIA about 65% of the time. The equity impact numbers for routine measles vaccination averaged across wealth quintiles were usually greater than for SIA measles vaccination across country-year observations. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis examined how different measles vaccine delivery platforms can affect equity. It can serve to elucidate the impact of immunization and public health programs in terms of comparing horizontal to vertical delivery efforts and in reducing health inequalities in global and country-level decision-making.


Assuntos
Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Programas de Imunização/organização & administração , Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacina contra Sarampo/administração & dosagem , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Criança , Países em Desenvolvimento , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Imunização/economia , Cobertura Vacinal/economia , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos
17.
BMC Infect Dis ; 20(1): 481, 2020 Jul 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32635891

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ethiopia has low measles immunization coverage and little is known about the disparities surrounding what coverage is provided. This study assessed disparities in measles immunization and its change over time using the four Ethiopia Demographic and Health Surveys conducted between 2000 and 2016. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analysis of data using Ethiopia Demographic and Health Surveys (EDHS) conducted between 2000 and 2016. We used the World Health Organization's (WHO) Health Equity Assessment Toolkit (HEAT) to present the inequalities. Four measures of inequality were calculated: Difference (D), Ratio (R), Population Attributable Fraction (PAF) and Population Attributable Risk (PAR). The results were disaggregated by wealth, education, residence, sex and sub-national regions and 95% Uncertainty Intervals (UIs) were computed for each point estimate to boost confidence of the findings. RESULTS: Measles immunization coverage was higher among the richest and secondary and above schools' subgroup by nearly 30 to 31 percentage points based on point estimates (D = 31%; 95% CI; 19.48, 42.66) and 29.8 percentage points (D = 29.8%; 95% CI; 16.57, 43.06) as compared to the poorest and no education subgroup respectively in the 2016 survey. Still, in the 2016 survey, substantial economic status (PAF = 36.73; 95%CI: 29.78, 43.68), (R = 1.71; 95%CI: 1.35, 2.08), education status (PAF = 45.07; 95% CI: 41.95, 48.18), (R = 1.60; 95% CI: 1.30, 1.90), place of residence (PAF = 39.84, 95% CI: 38.40, 41.27), (R = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.20, 1. 74) and regional (PAF = 71.35, 95% CI: 31.76, 110.95), (R = 3.09, 95%CI: 2.01, 4.17) inequality were observed with both simple and complex measures. There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of measles immunization between male and female children in all the studied years, as indicated, for instance, by measures of PAF in 2000 (PAF = 0; 95%CI: - 6.79, 6.79), 2005 (PAF = 0; 95%CI: - 6.04, 6.04), 2011(PAF = 0; 95%CI: - 3.79, 3.79) and 2016 (PAF = 2.66; - 1.67; 6.99). Overall, the inequality of measles immunization narrowed significantly by at least some of the measures between the first and the last survey periods across all the studied subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: National, regional and district levels of government should make a pledge to reduce inequalities in coverage of measles immunization. Equity-sensitive strategies, sufficient human and financial resources as well as continued research and monitoring of immunization coverage inequalities are necessary to achieve related sustainable development goals.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Vacina contra Sarampo/uso terapêutico , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Cobertura Vacinal/economia , Cobertura Vacinal/tendências , Vacinação/tendências , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Etiópia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Sarampo/virologia , Vacina contra Sarampo/imunologia , Morbillivirus/imunologia , Pobreza , Inquéritos e Questionários , Organização Mundial da Saúde
18.
PLoS One ; 15(6): e0233499, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32484811

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programs are established to be cost-effective before implementation. WHO recommends HPV vaccination for girls aged 9-13 years to tackle the high burden of cervical cancer. This review examined the existing evidence on the cost-effectiveness of the 9-valent HPV vaccine within a global context. METHODS: The literature search covering a period of January 2000 to 31 July 2019 was conducted in PubMed and Scopus bibliographic databases. A combined checklist (i.e., WHO, Drummond and CHEERS) was used to examine the quality of eligible studies. A total of 12 studies were eligible for this review and most of them were conducted in developed countries. RESULTS: Despite some heterogeneity in approaches to measure cost-effectiveness, ten studies concluded that 9vHPV vaccination was cost-effective and two did not. The addition of adolescent boys into immunisation programs was cost effective when vaccine price and coverage was comparatively low. When vaccination coverage for females was more than 75%, gender neutral HPV vaccination was less cost-effective than vaccination targeting only girls aged 9-18 years. Multi cohort immunization approach was found cost-effective in the age range of 9-14 years. However, the upper age limit at which vaccination was found not cost-effective requires further evaluation. This review identified duration of vaccine protection, time horizon, vaccine price, coverage, healthcare costs, efficacy and discounting rates as the most dominating parameters in determining cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: These findings have implications in extending HPV immunization programs whether switching to the 9-valent vaccine or the inclusion of adolescent boys' vaccination or extending the age of vaccination. Further, this review also supports extending vaccination programs to low-resource settings where vaccine prices are competitive, donor funding is available, burden of cervical cancer is high and screening options are limited.


Assuntos
Papillomaviridae/imunologia , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/economia , Adolescente , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Análise Custo-Benefício/métodos , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Imunização/economia , Programas de Imunização/economia , Masculino , Papillomaviridae/patogenicidade , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/imunologia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Vacinação/economia , Cobertura Vacinal/economia
19.
Pan Afr Med J ; 35(Suppl 1): 11, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32373262

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Poor data quality and use have been identified as key challenges that negatively impact immunization programs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In addition, many LMICs have a shortage of health personnel, and staff available have demanding workloads across several health programs. In order to address these challenges, the Better Immunization Data (BID) Initiative introduced a comprehensive suite of interventions, including an electronic immunization registry aimed at improving the quality, reliability, and use of immunization data in Arusha Region, Tanzania, and Southern Province of Zambia. The objective of this study was to assess the incremental costs of implementing the BID interventions in immunization programs in these two countries. METHODS: We conducted a micro-costing study to estimate the economic costs of service delivery and logistics for the immunization programs with and without the BID interventions in a sample of health facilities and district program offices in each country. Structured questionnaires were used to interview immunization program staff at baseline and post-intervention to assess annual resource utilization and costs. Cost outcomes were reported as annual cost per facility, cost per district and changes in resource costs due to the BID interventions (i.e., costs associated with health worker time, start-up costs, etc.). Sub-group analyses were conducted by health facility to assess variation in costs by volume served and location (rural versus urban). One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify influential parameters. Costs were reported in 2017 US dollars. RESULTS: In Tanzania, the average annual reduction in resource costs was estimated at US$10,236 (95% confidence interval: $7,606-$14,123) per health facility, while the average annual reduction in resource costs per district was estimated at $6,542. In Zambia, reductions in resource costs were modest at an estimated annual average of $628 (95% confidence interval: $209-$1,467) per health facility and $236 per district. Resource cost reductions were mainly attributable to reductions in time required for immunization service delivery and reporting. One-way sensitivity analyses identified key cost drivers, all related to reductions in health worker time. CONCLUSION: The introduction of electronic immunization registries and stock management systems through the BID Initiative was estimated to result in potential time savings in both countries. Health worker time was the area most impacted by the interventions, suggesting that time savings gained could be utilized for patient care. Information generated through this work provides evidence to inform stakeholder decision-making for scale-up of the BID interventions in Tanzania and Zambia and to inform other Low-to-Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) interested in similar interventions.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Vacinação em Massa/economia , Vacinação em Massa/organização & administração , Sistema de Registros , Estoque Estratégico/economia , Estoque Estratégico/organização & administração , Vacinas , Criança , Redução de Custos/métodos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Confiabilidade dos Dados , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/economia , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/organização & administração , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/economia , Programas de Imunização/métodos , Programas de Imunização/organização & administração , Programas de Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação em Massa/métodos , Vacinação em Massa/estatística & dados numéricos , Vigilância da População/métodos , Estoque Estratégico/estatística & dados numéricos , Tanzânia/epidemiologia , Cobertura Vacinal/economia , Cobertura Vacinal/organização & administração , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas/economia , Vacinas/provisão & distribuição , Zâmbia/epidemiologia
20.
Pan Afr Med J ; 35(Suppl 1): 15, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32373266

RESUMO

The recent setbacks in efforts to achieve measles elimination goals are alarming. To reverse the current trends, it is imperative that the global health community urgently intensify efforts and make resource commitments to implement evidence-based elimination strategies fully, including supporting research and innovations. The Immunization Agenda 2030: A Global Strategy to Leave No One Behind (IA2030) is the new global guidance document that builds on lessons learned and progress made toward the GVAP goals, includes research and innovation as a core strategic priority, and identifies measles as a "tracer" for improving immunisation services and strengthening primary health care systems. To achieve vaccination coverage and equity targets that leave no one behind, and accelerate progress toward disease eradication and elimination goals, sustained and predictable investments are needed for the identified research and innovations priorities for the new decade.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Imunização/economia , Invenções/economia , Investimentos em Saúde , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Erradicação de Doenças/economia , Erradicação de Doenças/organização & administração , Erradicação de Doenças/normas , Surtos de Doenças/economia , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Obtenção de Fundos/métodos , Obtenção de Fundos/tendências , Saúde Global/economia , Saúde Global/normas , Saúde Global/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Imunização/métodos , Programas de Imunização/economia , Programas de Imunização/métodos , Programas de Imunização/organização & administração , Incidência , Invenções/tendências , Investimentos em Saúde/economia , Investimentos em Saúde/organização & administração , Investimentos em Saúde/tendências , Sarampo/economia , Vacina contra Sarampo/economia , Vacina contra Sarampo/uso terapêutico , Cobertura Vacinal/economia , Cobertura Vacinal/organização & administração , Cobertura Vacinal/normas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA