Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 47
Filtrar
1.
PLoS One ; 16(9): e0256837, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34570772

RESUMO

Chinese e-commerce companies are in the ascendant into the overseas market, while still lack adequate academic attention. Adopting case study and public policy approaches, this article applies the symbiosis theory, based on the fundamentals of the development data of Chinese e-commerce companies in the Indonesia market, to construct an evaluation model and proposes a strategic orientation to reaching an embedded survival and further development. Through understanding the structural characteristics and developing status of different types of Chinese e-commerce companies going overseas, a detailed investigation to the Chinese e-commerce companies investing in Indonesia has been conducted. Findings show that the production capacity cooperation stage of the two countries has a trend of asymmetric symbiosis gradually developing towards symmetric symbiosis. To promote a continuous economic cooperation between China and Indonesia, this article proposes that the national-level collaboration policies, cross-border e-commerce value chain, as well as organizational-level coordination are the key sectors for reaching the vision of symmetric symbiosis between the two countries. Sectors in infrastructure, trade, capital, and people's mindset intimacy also contribute to construct a symbiosis mechanism for capacity cooperation between the two nations.


Assuntos
Comércio/estatística & dados numéricos , Correio Eletrônico/economia , Cooperação Internacional , Modelos Econométricos , China , Humanos , Indonésia , Investimentos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 30(7): 1000-1004, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32522772

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Risk stratification has resulted in patient-initiated follow-up being introduced for low-risk endometrial cancer in place of routine hospital follow-up. The financial benefit to the patient and the healthcare economy of patient-initiated follow-up, as compared with hospital follow-up, has yet to be explored. In this study, we explored the potential impact for both the healthcare economy and patients of patient-initiated follow-up. METHODS: Women diagnosed with low-risk endometrial cancer enrolled on a patient-initiated follow-up scheme between November 2014 and September 2018 were included. Data on the number of telephone calls to the nurse specialists and clinic appointments attended were collected prospectively. The number of clinic appointments that would have taken place if the patient had continued on hospital follow-up, rather than starting on patient-initiated follow-up, was calculated and costs determined using standard National Health Service (NHS) reference costs. The time/distance traveled by patients from their home address to the hospital clinic was calculated and used to determine patient-related costs. RESULTS: A total of 187 patients with a median of 37 (range 2-62) months follow-up after primary surgery were enrolled on the scheme. In total, the cohort were scheduled to attend 1673 appointments with hospital follow-up, whereas they only attended 69 clinic appointments and made 107 telephone contacts with patient-initiated follow-up. There was a 93.5% reduction in costs from a projected £194 068.00 for hospital follow-up to £12 676.33 for patient-initiated follow-up. The mean patient-related costs were reduced by 95.6% with patient-initiated follow-up. The total mileage traveled by patients for hospital follow-up was 30 891.4 miles, which was associated with a mean traveling time per patient of 7.41 hours and clinic/waiting time of 7.5 hours compared with 1165.8 miles and 0.46 hours and 0.5 hours, respectively, for patient-initiated follow-up. CONCLUSION: The introduction of a patient self-management follow-up scheme for low-risk endometrial cancer was associated with financial/time saving to both the patient and the healthcare economy as compared with hospital follow-up.


Assuntos
Alocação de Custos/economia , Correio Eletrônico/economia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/economia , Telefone/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Custos e Análise de Custo , Neoplasias do Endométrio/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Reino Unido
3.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 19(1): 45, 2019 03 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30836935

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies find that identifying additional study data is possible by contacting study authors or experts. What is less certain is the time taken, costs involved and value found by using this supplementary search method. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness, efficiency, cost and value of contacting study authors by e-mail, updating the evidence available for this search method. METHODS: Eighty-eight study authors, whose studies met title/abstract inclusion in a. systematic review, were contacted by e-mail. * effectiveness was assessed by comparing the number of study authors contacted. compared to the number of replies received; * efficiency was assessed by recording the time taken to contact study authors; * cost was assessed by comparing the efficiency of contacting authors with the. effectiveness; and * value was assessed by reading and comparing the published studies with the replies received to see if any unique data was identified. RESULTS: Contacting study authors took 6 h, 54 min and 25 s across 7 weeks. 38 answers (46%) were received from 83 possible contacts. Contacting study authors cost £80.33 or £2.11 per reply. We identified unique data from author replies when compared with data reported in published studies, determining this method as 'valuable'. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst our effectiveness findings differ from other studies, we believe that this study demonstrates the effectiveness of contacting study authors. By linking effectiveness to value and cost, we offer a new way to interpret the 'effectiveness' of this supplementary search method.


Assuntos
Autoria , Coleta de Dados , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto , Humanos , Comunicação , Análise Custo-Benefício , Coleta de Dados/economia , Coleta de Dados/métodos , Coleta de Dados/estatística & dados numéricos , Correio Eletrônico/economia , Correio Eletrônico/estatística & dados numéricos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , Projetos de Pesquisa/estatística & dados numéricos
4.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 20(9): 1095-1100, 2018 08 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30124987

RESUMO

Introduction: Direct-to-consumer tobacco marketing, including direct mail and email coupons, is a potentially influential marketing strategy. We examined the associations between receipt of tobacco direct mail/email coupons and trajectories of smoking behavior among US adults. Methods: Data were from the US Population Assessment on Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study adult sample (n = 32160) collected during 2013-2014. Participants self-reported their smoking status (every day, some days, not at all) 12 months prior to the survey (T0) and at the time of the survey (T1). Three smoking trajectories were identified: nonsmokers progressing to current smokers, current smokers continuing to smoke, and among current smokers at T0, progressing to or continuing with daily smoking. Participants also reported receipt of direct mail/email tobacco coupons in the 6 months preceding T1 (yes/no). Weighted multiple logistic regression models were used to test the associations between receiving direct mail/email tobacco coupons and different smoking trajectories adjusted for demographic characteristics. Results: One in eight (12.4%) US adult nonsmokers and 36.2% adult smokers at T0 reported receiving tobacco coupons. Receipt of tobacco coupons was negatively associated with poverty status. Receipt of tobacco coupons was associated with increased odds of progression to current smoking (AOR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.45 to 2.12), continuation of smoking (AOR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.65), and current smokers' progression to or continuation with daily smoking (AOR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.50 to 1.91). Conclusions: Direct-to-consumer tobacco coupons may promote progression of smoking among nonsmokers, and continuation of smoking and progression to daily smoking among smokers in US adults. Implications: Distributing direct mail coupons is a strategy employed by tobacco companies to promote their products. We found, in a US national study, that many adults received tobacco coupons, and receiving these coupons was associated with subsequent progression of smoking among nonsmokers, and continuation of smoking and daily smoking among smokers. Scrutiny over the use of direct mail coupons and its effects on population health is warranted. Future research is needed to evaluate the effect of different interventions to reduce the impact of these coupons on smoking behaviors.


Assuntos
Publicidade Direta ao Consumidor/economia , Correio Eletrônico/economia , Serviços Postais/economia , Indústria do Tabaco/economia , Produtos do Tabaco/economia , Fumar Tabaco/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Publicidade Direta ao Consumidor/métodos , Correio Eletrônico/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Serviços Postais/tendências , Autorrelato , Fumar/economia , Fumar/epidemiologia , Fumar/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Indústria do Tabaco/tendências , Fumar Tabaco/psicologia , Uso de Tabaco/economia , Uso de Tabaco/psicologia , Uso de Tabaco/tendências , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
5.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 92: 116-125, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28844786

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the response rates, data completeness, and representativeness of survey data produced by online and postal surveys. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A randomized trial nested within a cohort study in Yorkshire, United Kingdom. Participants were randomized to receive either an electronic (online) survey questionnaire with paper reminder (N = 2,982) or paper questionnaire with electronic reminder (N = 2,855). RESULTS: Response rates were similar for electronic contact and postal contacts (50.9% vs. 49.7%, difference = 1.2%, 95% confidence interval: -1.3% to 3.8%). The characteristics of those responding to the two groups were similar. Participants nevertheless demonstrated an overwhelming preference for postal questionnaires, with the majority responding by post in both groups. CONCLUSION: Online survey questionnaire systems need to be supplemented with a postal reminder to achieve acceptable uptake, but doing so provides a similar response rate and case mix when compared to postal questionnaires alone. For large surveys, online survey systems may be cost saving.


Assuntos
Correio Eletrônico/economia , Seleção de Pacientes , Serviços Postais/economia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Intervalos de Confiança , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistemas On-Line/economia , Serviços Postais/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Alerta , Reino Unido , Redação , Adulto Jovem
7.
Sleep Breath ; 20(2): 777-85, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26754933

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effectiveness and coaching labor requirements of a web-based automated telehealth (TH) messaging program compared with standard of care (SOC) in newly diagnosed patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: In this non-blinded, multicenter, prospective study, all patients were started on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with heated humidification and a wireless modem. They all received standardized CPAP education and setup. Patients in the TH group (n = 58) received an automated series of text messages and/or e-mails that were triggered by preset conditions. Patients in the SOC group (n = 64) received scheduled calls on days 1, 7, 14, and 30. Additional contacts were allowed for patients in both groups as deemed clinically necessary. Coaching labor was calculated by totaling the number and type of patient contacts and assigning historical time values. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two patients were included in the final analysis. There were no statistically significant differences between the TH and SOC groups for Medicare adherence (83 vs. 73 %), daily CPAP usage (5.1 ± 1.9 h vs. 4.7 ± 2.1 h), CPAP efficacy (mean residual apnea-hypopnea index (3.0 ± 4.1/h vs. 2.8 ± 3.8/h), or change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (-5.8 ± 5.5 vs. -5.1 ± 5.9), although all trends favored the TH group. There was, however, a significant reduction in the number of minutes coaching required per patient in the TH vs. SOC group (23.9 ± 26 vs. 58.3 ± 25, 59 % reduction; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Use of a web-based telehealth program for CPAP adherence coaching significantly reduced the coaching labor requirement compared with SOC, while maintaining similar adherence and effectiveness.


Assuntos
Pressão Positiva Contínua nas Vias Aéreas/psicologia , Internet , Cooperação do Paciente/psicologia , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/psicologia , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/terapia , Telemedicina , Pressão Positiva Contínua nas Vias Aéreas/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Correio Eletrônico/economia , Humanos , Internet/economia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/economia , Estudos Prospectivos , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/economia , Telemedicina/economia , Envio de Mensagens de Texto/economia , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Ann Plast Surg ; 76(1): 3-5, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26418779

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Web-based surveys save time and money. As electronic questionnaires have increased in popularity, telephone and mailed surveys have declined. With any survey, a response rate of 75% or greater is critical for the validity of any study. We wanted to determine which survey method achieved the highest response among academic plastic surgeons. METHODS: All American Association of Plastic Surgeons members were surveyed regarding authorship issues. They were randomly assigned to receive the questionnaire through 1 of 4 methods: (A) emailed with a link to an online survey; (B) regular mail; (C) regular mail + $1 bill, and (D) regular mail + $5 bill. Two weeks after the initial mailing, the number of responses was collected, and nonresponders were contacted to remind them to participate. The study was closed after 10 weeks. Survey costs were calculated based on the actual cost of sending the initial survey, including stationary, printing, postage (groups B-D), labor, and cost of any financial incentives. Cost of reminders to nonresponders was calculated at $5 per reminder, giving a total survey cost. RESULTS: Of 662 surveys sent, 54 were returned because of incorrect address/email, retirement, or death. Four hundred seventeen of the remaining 608 surveys were returned and analyzed. The response rate was lowest in the online group and highest in those mailed with a monetary incentive. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the convenience and low initial cost of web-based surveys, this generated the lowest response. We obtained statistically significant response rates (79% and 84%) only by using postal mail with monetary incentives and reminders. The inclusion of a $1 bill represented the greatest value and cost-effective survey method, based on cost per response.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Correio Eletrônico/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Cirurgia Plástica/normas , Correio Eletrônico/economia , Feminino , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Controle de Qualidade , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgia Plástica/tendências , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos
9.
Hormones (Athens) ; 14(4): 632-43, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26188234

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To monitor and control the blood glucose levels in inefficiently insulin-treated patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) using a telemonitoring system and determine whether the improvement of HbA1c has a lasting effect following its discontinuation. DESIGN: Seventy inefficiently controlled insulin-treated DM patients using telemonitoring (telemonitoring group-TG) [HbA1c 9.9±2.3% (85±24.9mmol/mol)] and 35 age-, body mass index (BMI)- and Hba1c-matched insulin-treated patients receiving outpatient care (control group-CG) [HbA1c 9.7±2.1% (82±23.4mmol/mol)] were enrolled. Data of TG were transmitted from the glucose-meters to our computers via modem. Communication was achieved via e-mails and mobile phone text-messages through integrated software. HbA1c and BMI were evaluated at enrollment, 3 and 6 months, and 6 months after telemonitoring discontinuation. Frequency of hypo- and hyperglycemias and cost were also analyzed. RESULTS: Significant reduction in HbA1c was observed in TG both at 3 [7.1±1.0% (54±10.5mmol/mol) p<0.001] and 6 months [6.9±0.9% (52±9.5mmol/mol) p<0.001], compared to the CG group at the same timepoints. Significant reduction was also observed in the TG subgroups with ΗbA1c≥10% and 10>HbA1c≥7.5% at 3 and 6 months, compared to CG. No statistically significant differences in BMI were observed between TG and CG. Six months after telemonitoring discontinuation, HbA1c in TG was slightly increased [7.3±1.0% (56±10.4mol/mol)]. Attenuation was also observed in both TG subgroups. Compared to CG, the number of monthly hypo- and hyperglycemias was reduced in TG. The intervention had a financial benefit for patients living more than 100 km from the health care provider. CONCLUSIONS: Telemonitoring can result in reduction of HbA1c and frequency of hypo- and hyperglycemias. This beneficial effect is slightly attenuated 6 months after terminating telemonitoring.


Assuntos
Glicemia/efeitos dos fármacos , Índice de Massa Corporal , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/economia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economia , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Insulina/uso terapêutico , Telemedicina/economia , Telemetria/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Biomarcadores/sangue , Glicemia/metabolismo , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Correio Eletrônico/economia , Retroalimentação Psicológica , Feminino , Grécia , Humanos , Hipoglicemia/sangue , Hipoglicemia/induzido quimicamente , Hipoglicemia/economia , Hipoglicemia/prevenção & controle , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Insulina/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemetria/métodos , Envio de Mensagens de Texto/economia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Trials ; 15: 181, 2014 May 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24886555

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Guided self-help is a recommended first-step treatment for bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder and atypical variants of these disorders. Further research is needed to compare guided self-help that is delivered face-to-face versus via email. METHODS/DESIGN: This clinical trial uses a randomised, controlled design to investigate the effectiveness of providing guided self-help either face-to-face or via e-mail, also using a delayed treatment control condition. At least 17 individuals are required per group, giving a minimum N of 51. DISCUSSION: Symptom outcomes will be assessed and estimates of cost-effectiveness made. Results are proposed to be disseminated locally and internationally (through submission to conferences and peer-reviewed journals), and will hopefully inform local service provision. The trial has been approved by an ethics review board and was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01832792 on 9 April 2013.


Assuntos
Transtorno da Compulsão Alimentar/terapia , Correio Eletrônico , Comportamento Alimentar , Psicoterapia/métodos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Autocuidado , Terapia Assistida por Computador , Transtorno da Compulsão Alimentar/diagnóstico , Transtorno da Compulsão Alimentar/economia , Transtorno da Compulsão Alimentar/psicologia , Protocolos Clínicos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Correio Eletrônico/economia , Inglaterra , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Psicoterapia/economia , Autocuidado/economia , Terapia Assistida por Computador/economia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 32(8): 1361-7, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23918479

RESUMO

Because electronic communication is quick, convenient, and inexpensive for most patients, care that is truly patient centered should promote the use of such communication between patients and providers, even using it as a substitute for office visits when clinically appropriate. Despite the potential benefits of electronic communication, fewer than 7 percent of providers used it in 2008. To learn from the experiences of providers that have widely incorporated electronic communication into patient care, we interviewed leaders of twenty-one medical groups that use it extensively with patients. We also interviewed staff in six of those groups. Electronic communication was widely perceived to be a safe, effective, and efficient means of communication that improves patient satisfaction and saves patients time but that increases the volume of physician work unless office visits are reduced. Practice redesign and new payment methods are likely necessary for electronic communication to be more widely used in patient care.


Assuntos
Barreiras de Comunicação , Correio Eletrônico , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Consulta Remota , Envio de Mensagens de Texto , Alfabetização Digital , Análise Custo-Benefício/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício/estatística & dados numéricos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/economia , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Correio Eletrônico/economia , Correio Eletrônico/estatística & dados numéricos , Prática de Grupo/economia , Prática de Grupo/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Satisfação do Paciente , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/economia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/estatística & dados numéricos , Consulta Remota/economia , Consulta Remota/estatística & dados numéricos , Envio de Mensagens de Texto/economia , Envio de Mensagens de Texto/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde
15.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 19(5): 855-61, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22640009

RESUMO

RATIONALE: A multidisciplinary primary care clinic in Sydney, Australia, was planning to use electronic questionnaires to measure patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 20 patients were undertaken to explore, among other things, practical issues regarding different questionnaire formats. The response rates and costs of email versus postal invitations were also evaluated. RESULTS: Compared with postal invitations, email invitations offered a cost-effective and practical alternative, with a greater proportion of patients volunteering for an interview. Assuming the interface is well-designed and user-friendly, many patients were happy to use the Internet to answer questionnaires. Most patients thought alternate formats should also be offered. Patients discussed advantages and disadvantages of the Internet format. Although more younger patients and females had given the clinic an email address; both sexes, and young and old patients, expressed strong preferences for either wanting or not wanting to use the Internet. CONCLUSION: Researchers should consider using email invitations as a cost-effective first-line strategy to recruit patients to participate in health services research. Internet questionnaires are potentially cheaper than paper questionnaires, and the format is acceptable to many patients. However, for the time being, concurrent alternate formats need to be offered to ensure wider acceptability and to maximize response rates.


Assuntos
Correio Eletrônico/economia , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Internet/economia , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , Fatores Etários , Austrália , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/economia , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Participação do Paciente , Preferência do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Seleção de Pacientes , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Fatores Sexuais , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
16.
Health Technol Assess ; 16(38): 1-205, iii-v, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23046909

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Smoking is harmful to health. On average, lifelong smokers lose 10 years of life, and about half of all lifelong smokers have their lives shortened by smoking. Stopping smoking reverses or prevents many of these harms. However, cessation services in the NHS achieve variable success rates with smokers who want to quit. Approaches to behaviour change can be supplemented with electronic aids, and this may significantly increase quit rates and prevent a proportion of cases that relapse. OBJECTIVE: The primary research question we sought to answer was: What is the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of internet, pc and other electronic aids to help people stop smoking? We addressed the following three questions: (1) What is the effectiveness of internet sites, computer programs, mobile telephone text messages and other electronic aids for smoking cessation and/or reducing relapse? (2) What is the cost-effectiveness of incorporating internet sites, computer programs, mobile telephone text messages and other electronic aids into current nhs smoking cessation programmes? and (3) What are the current gaps in research into the effectiveness of internet sites, computer programs, mobile telephone text messages and other electronic aids to help people stop smoking? DATA SOURCES: For the effectiveness review, relevant primary studies were sought from The Cochrane Library [Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)] 2009, Issue 4, and MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC) (Ovid) and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (EBSCOhost) from 1980 to December 2009. In addition, NHS Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED) and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) were searched for information on cost-effectiveness and modelling for the same period. Reference lists of included studies and of relevant systematic reviews were examined to identify further potentially relevant studies. Research registries of ongoing studies including National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Network Portfolio Database, Current Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov were also searched, and further information was sought from contacts with experts. REVIEW METHODS: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs evaluating smoking cessation programmes that utilise computer, internet, mobile telephone or other electronic aids in adult smokers were included in the effectiveness review. Relevant studies of other design were included in the cost-effectiveness review and supplementary review. Pair-wise meta-analyses using both random- and fixed-effects models were carried out. Bayesian mixed-treatment comparisons (MTCs) were also performed. A de novo decision-analytical model was constructed for estimating the cost-effectiveness of interventions. Expected value of perfect information (EVPI) was calculated. Narrative synthesis of key themes and issues that may influence the acceptability and usability of electronic aids was provided in the supplementary review. RESULTS: This effectiveness review included 60 RCTs/quasi-RCTs reported in 77 publications. Pooled estimate for prolonged abstinence [relative risk (RR) = 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21 to 1.45] and point prevalence abstinence (RR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.22) suggested that computer and other electronic aids increase the likelihood of cessation compared with no intervention or generic self-help materials. There was no significant difference in effect sizes between aid to cessation studies (which provide support to smokers who are ready to quit) and cessation induction studies (which attempt to encourage a cessation attempt in smokers who are not yet ready to quit). Results from MTC also showed small but significant intervention effect (time to relapse, mean hazard ratio 0.87, 95% credible interval 0.83 to 0.92). Cost-threshold analyses indicated some form of electronic intervention is likely to be cost-effective when added to non-electronic behavioural support, but there is substantial uncertainty with regard to what the most effective (thus most cost-effective) type of electronic intervention is, which warrants further research. EVPI calculations suggested the upper limit for the benefit of this research is around £ 2000-3000 per person. LIMITATIONS: The review focuses on smoking cessation programmes in the adult population, but does not cover smoking cessation in adolescents. Most available evidence relates to interventions with a single tailored component, while evidence for different modes of delivery (e.g. e-mail, text messaging) is limited. Therefore, the findings of lack of sufficient evidence for proving or refuting effectiveness should not be regarded as evidence of ineffectiveness. We have examined only a small number of factors that could potentially influence the effectiveness of the interventions. A comprehensive evaluation of potential effect modifiers at study level in a systematic review of complex interventions remains challenging. Information presented in published papers is often insufficient to allow accurate coding of each intervention or comparator. A limitation of the cost-effectiveness analysis, shared with several previous cost-effectiveness analyses of smoking cessation interventions, is that intervention benefit is restricted to the first quit attempt. Exploring the impact of interventions on subsequent attempts requires more detailed information on patient event histories than is available from current evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Our effectiveness review concluded that computer and other electronic aids increase the likelihood of cessation compared with no intervention or generic self-help materials, but the effect is small. The effectiveness does not appear to vary with respect to mode of delivery and concurrent non-electronic co-interventions. Our cost-effectiveness review suggests that making some form of electronic support available to smokers actively seeking to quit is highly likely to be cost-effective. This is true whether the electronic intervention is delivered alongside brief advice or more intensive counselling. The key source of uncertainty is that around the comparative effectiveness of different types of electronic interventions. Our review suggests that further research is needed on the relative benefits of different forms of delivery for electronic aids, the content of delivery, and the acceptability of these technologies for smoking cessation with subpopulations of smokers, particularly disadvantaged groups. More evidence is also required on the relationship between involving users in the design of interventions and the impact this has on effectiveness, and finally on how electronic aids developed and tested in research settings are applied in routine practice and in the community.


Assuntos
Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/economia , Medicina Estatal/economia , Telecomunicações/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Correio Eletrônico/economia , Humanos , Internet/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Software/economia , Envio de Mensagens de Texto/economia , Adulto Jovem
17.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 65(7): 793-7, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22306007

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate which of two invitation methods, e-mail or post, was most effective at recruiting general practitioners (GPs) to an online trial. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized controlled trial. Participants were GPs in Scotland, United Kingdom. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy GPs were recruited. Using e-mail did not improve recruitment (risk difference=0.7% [95% confidence interval -2.7% to 4.1%]). E-mail was, however, simpler to use and cheaper, costing £3.20 per recruit compared with £15.69 for postal invitations. Reminders increased recruitment by around 4% for each reminder sent for both invitation methods. CONCLUSIONS: In the Scottish context, inviting GPs to take part in an online trial by e-mail does not adversely affect recruitment and is logistically easier and cheaper than using postal invitations.


Assuntos
Correio Eletrônico/estatística & dados numéricos , Clínicos Gerais/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Postais/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Alerta/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Algoritmos , Intervalos de Confiança , Correio Eletrônico/economia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Seleção de Pacientes , Serviços Postais/economia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estudos de Amostragem , Escócia/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
18.
Urology ; 79(2): 314-9, 2012 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22137540

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To describe a novel, low-cost, online health-related quality of life (HRQOL) survey that allows for automated follow-up and convenient access for patients in geographically diverse locations. Clinicians and investigators have been encouraged to use validated HRQOL instruments when reporting outcomes after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: The institutional review board approved our protocol and the use of a secure web site (http://www.SurveyMonkey.com) to send patients a collection of validated postprostatectomy HRQOL instruments by electronic mail. To assess compliance with the electronic mail format, a pilot study of cross-sectional surveys was sent to patients who presented for follow-up after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. The response data were transmitted in secure fashion in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. RESULTS: After providing written informed consent, 514 patients who presented for follow-up after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy from March 2010 to February 2011 were sent the online survey. A total of 293 patients (57%) responded, with an average age of 60 years and a median interval from surgery of 12 months. Of the respondents, 75% completed the survey within 4 days of receiving the electronic mail, with a median completion time of 15 minutes. The total survey administration costs were limited to the web site's $200 annual fee-for-service. CONCLUSIONS: An online survey can be a low-cost, efficient, and confidential modality for assessing validated HRQOL outcomes in patients who undergo treatment of localized prostate cancer. This method could be especially useful for those who cannot return for follow-up because of geographic reasons.


Assuntos
Correio Eletrônico , Laparoscopia/psicologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/psicologia , Prostatectomia/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários , Segurança Computacional , Confidencialidade , Estudos Transversais , Escolaridade , Correio Eletrônico/economia , Humanos , Renda , Internet/economia , Masculino , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Satisfação do Paciente , Projetos Piloto , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Prostatectomia/métodos , Robótica , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários/economia , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
Int J Urban Reg Res ; 35(3): 659-75, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21898938

RESUMO

Since the early Chicago School, urban researchers have used residential proximity to assess contacts within and between racial and ethnic groups. This approach is increasingly limited. Diverse groups use email, social networking sites, instant messaging and mobile phones to communicate across urban zones and distant cities. These practices enable mutual support among far-flung family members and co-ethnics as they engage with an array of institutions throughout their day. Through interviews and observations that include women and men of diverse occupations, races and national origins, the author explores how and why cross-place enclosures of sociality and resources develop. Rather than framing the residential area as the locus of racial/ethnic concentration, the author focuses on cross-place concentrations in the technologically mediated workspace. This study enhances theorization of the structural negotiations, interpersonal pressures and group preferences that produce separate lifeworlds in globalizing cities.


Assuntos
Etnicidade , Relações Interpessoais , Tecnologia , Saúde da População Urbana , População Urbana , Telefone Celular/economia , Telefone Celular/história , Cidades/economia , Cidades/etnologia , Cidades/história , Cidades/legislação & jurisprudência , Meios de Comunicação/economia , Meios de Comunicação/história , Correio Eletrônico/economia , Correio Eletrônico/história , Etnicidade/educação , Etnicidade/etnologia , Etnicidade/história , Etnicidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Etnicidade/psicologia , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Relações Interpessoais/história , Grupos Populacionais/educação , Grupos Populacionais/etnologia , Grupos Populacionais/história , Grupos Populacionais/legislação & jurisprudência , Grupos Populacionais/psicologia , Relações Raciais/história , Relações Raciais/legislação & jurisprudência , Relações Raciais/psicologia , Classe Social/história , Tecnologia/economia , Tecnologia/educação , Tecnologia/história , Saúde da População Urbana/história , População Urbana/história
20.
Mo Med ; 108(2): 136-40, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21568238

RESUMO

Numerous surveys have found patients expressing strong interest in e-mail communication with their physicians. However, currently very limited literature is available on physician interest. A survey was e-mailed to the members of the Missouri Chapter of the American College of Physicians to ascertain their specific concerns. Very few physicians use electronic mail with patients. Even fewer use it on a frequent basis and most do not give any written policy guidelines to patients.


Assuntos
Correio Eletrônico/estatística & dados numéricos , American Recovery and Reinvestment Act , Confidencialidade , Correio Eletrônico/economia , Honorários e Preços , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Missouri , Relações Médico-Paciente , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA