Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 754
Filtrar
2.
JAMA ; 332(11): 867-868, 2024 Sep 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39102222

RESUMO

This Viewpoint explores partisan attitudes toward Medicaid in the 2024 US election and the implications for access to care and health equity if a Republican proposal that includes work requirements and block grants moves forward.


Assuntos
Medicaid , Política , COVID-19 , Medicaid/legislação & jurisprudência , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/legislação & jurisprudência , Governo Estadual , Estados Unidos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência
3.
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol ; 27(1): 100950, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39025611

RESUMO

The office-based laboratory (OBL) industry has proliferated over the past decade as surgical cases have increasingly migrated from inpatient to outpatient surgical settings, including OBLs, ambulatory surgery centers and infusion centers. Although many physicians and patients prefer to provide and receive care in an OBL setting because it provides a high quality, lower cost and convenient alternative to receiving care in a hospital, the OBL industry is nonetheless under attack on a variety of fronts. Governmental and commercial payor reimbursement for OBL procedures has declined substantially over time, and there have been lawsuits, governmental investigations and news articles that have been critical of care provided in OBLs. These issues have generated headwinds for this young but growing industry. It is therefore important for physicians and investors alike interested in developing an OBL to be aware of the complex landscape of laws and regulations that apply to OBLs. This article provides an overview of key legal, corporate, tax, financial and structural considerations for operators to be aware of before opening an OBL.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos , Regulamentação Governamental , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia
4.
JAMA Health Forum ; 5(6): e242470, 2024 Jun 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38935366

RESUMO

This JAMA Forum discusses the effects of certificate of need laws, certificates of public advantage laws, and restrictions on physician-owned hospitals under the Affordable Care Act on hospital expansion and renovation and health care costs.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos , Controle de Custos/legislação & jurisprudência
5.
JAMA Health Forum ; 5(6): e242342, 2024 Jun 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38869886

RESUMO

This JAMA Forum discusses the promise and pitfalls of regulating prices in the US health care system.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Atenção à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência
8.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord ; 12(3): 101856, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38551528

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to systemically review the literature on Anterior Saphenous Vein (ASV) reflux treatment and insurance impediments to treatment coverage. METHODS: A literature search was performed using a PRISMA framework. In addition, a cross-sectional analysis of insurance policies for ASV treatment was evaluated. RESULTS: Published evidence and treatment considerations in the literature for ASV treatment are discussed. In 155 of 226 (68.6%) insurance policies reviewed coverage of ASV ablation was allowed while 62/226 (27.4%) did not specify coverage and 9/226 (4.0%) specified ASV treatment was not covered. Of the 155 that provide ASV coverage, 98 (62.2%) provide coverage with criteria such as requiring prior treatment of the great saphenous vein. CONCLUSIONS: Vein treatment experts should continue to advocate to insurance carriers to update their varicose vein treatment policies to reflect the substantial clinical evidence so that patients with ASV reflux can be appropriately treated.


Assuntos
Cobertura do Seguro , Veia Safena , Varizes , Insuficiência Venosa , Veia Safena/cirurgia , Humanos , Varizes/terapia , Varizes/economia , Insuficiência Venosa/terapia , Insuficiência Venosa/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/legislação & jurisprudência , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Técnicas de Ablação/economia
11.
Fertil Steril ; 116(4): 1119-1125, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34246467

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine infertility-related fund-raising campaigns on a popular crowdfunding website and to compare campaign characteristics across states with and without legislative mandates for insurance coverage for infertility-related care. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Online crowdfunding platform (GoFundMe) between 2010 and 2020. PATIENT(S): GoFundMe campaigns in the United States containing the keywords "fertility" and "infertility." INTERVENTION(S): State insurance mandates for infertility treatment coverage. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcomes included fund-raising goals, funds raised, campaign location, and campaigns per capita. RESULT(S): Of the 3,332 infertility-related campaigns analyzed, a total goal of $52.6 million was requested, with $22.5 million (42.8%) successfully raised. The average goal was $18,639 (standard deviation [SD] $32,904), and the average amount raised was $6,759 (SD $14,270). States with insurance mandates for infertility coverage had fewer crowdfunding campaigns per capita (0.75 vs. 1.15 campaigns per 100,000 population than states without insurance mandates. CONCLUSION(S): We found a large number of campaigns requesting financial assistance for costs associated with infertility care, indicating a substantial unmet financial burden. States with insurance mandates had fewer campaigns per capita, suggesting that mandates are effective in mitigating this financial burden. These data can inform future health policy legislation on the state and federal levels to assist with the financial burden of infertility.


Assuntos
Crowdsourcing/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Gastos em Saúde , Infertilidade/economia , Infertilidade/terapia , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Seguro Saúde/economia , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/economia , Planos Governamentais de Saúde/economia , Crowdsourcing/legislação & jurisprudência , Definição da Elegibilidade/economia , Feminino , Regulamentação Governamental , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Gastos em Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/economia , Humanos , Infertilidade/diagnóstico , Cobertura do Seguro/legislação & jurisprudência , Seguro Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Masculino , Avaliação das Necessidades/economia , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/legislação & jurisprudência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Planos Governamentais de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
19.
J Surg Res ; 263: 102-109, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33640844

RESUMO

The year 2020 marks the 10th anniversary of the signing of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Perhaps the greatest overhaul of the US health care system in the past 50 y, the ACA sought to expand access to care, improve quality, and reduce health care costs. Over the past decade, there have been a number of challenges and changes to the law, which remains in evolution. While the ACA's policies were not intended to specifically target surgical care, surgical patients, surgeons, and the health systems within which they function have all been greatly affected. This article aims to provide a brief overview of the impact of the ACA on surgical patients in reference to its tripartite aim of improving access, improving quality, and reducing costs.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/estatística & dados numéricos , Melhoria de Qualidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/história , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , História do Século XXI , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/legislação & jurisprudência , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/tendências , Melhoria de Qualidade/economia , Melhoria de Qualidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Melhoria de Qualidade/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/economia , Incerteza , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA