TDP-43 forms amyloid filaments with a distinct fold in type A FTLD-TDP.

The abnormal assembly of TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) in neuronal and glial cells characterizes nearly all cases of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and around half of cases of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD)1,2. A causal role for TDP-43 assembly in neurodegeneration is evidenced by dominantly inherited missense mutations in TARDBP, the gene encoding TDP-43, that promote assembly and give rise to ALS and FTLD3-7. At least four types (A-D) of FTLD with TDP-43 pathology (FTLD-TDP) are defined by distinct brain distributions of assembled TDP-43 and are associated with different clinical presentations of frontotemporal dementia8. We previously showed, using cryo-electron microscopy, that TDP-43 assembles into amyloid filaments in ALS and type B FTLD-TDP9. However, the structures of assembled TDP-43 in FTLD without ALS remained unknown. Here we report the cryo-electron microscopy structures of assembled TDP-43 from the brains of three individuals with the most common type of FTLD-TDP, type A. TDP-43 formed amyloid filaments with a new fold that was the same across individuals, indicating that this fold may characterize type A FTLD-TDP. The fold resembles a chevron badge and is unlike the double-spiral-shaped fold of ALS and type B FTLD-TDP, establishing that distinct filament folds of TDP-43 characterize different neurodegenerative conditions. The structures, in combination with mass spectrometry, led to the identification of two new post-translational modifications of assembled TDP-43, citrullination and monomethylation of R293, and indicate that they may facilitate filament formation and observed structural variation in individual filaments. The structures of TDP-43 filaments from type A FTLD-TDP will guide mechanistic studies of TDP-43 assembly, as well as the development of diagnostic and therapeutic compounds for TDP-43 proteinopathies.

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration proteinopathies have disparate microscopic patterns of white and grey matter pathology.

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration proteinopathies with tau inclusions (FTLD-Tau) or TDP-43 inclusions (FTLD-TDP) are associated with clinically similar phenotypes. However, these disparate proteinopathies likely differ in cellular severity and regional distribution of inclusions in white matter (WM) and adjacent grey matter (GM), which have been understudied. We performed a neuropathological study of subcortical WM and adjacent GM in a large autopsy cohort (n = 92; FTLD-Tau = 37, FTLD-TDP = 55) using a validated digital image approach. The antemortem clinical phenotype was behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) in 23 patients with FTLD-Tau and 42 with FTLD-TDP, and primary progressive aphasia (PPA) in 14 patients with FTLD-Tau and 13 with FTLD-TDP. We used linear mixed-effects models to: (1) compare WM pathology burden between proteinopathies; (2) investigate the relationship between WM pathology burden and WM degeneration using luxol fast blue (LFB) myelin staining; (3) study regional patterns of pathology burden in clinico-pathological groups. WM pathology burden was greater in FTLD-Tau compared to FTLD-TDP across regions (beta = 4.21, SE = 0.34, p < 0.001), and correlated with the degree of WM degeneration in both FTLD-Tau (beta = 0.32, SE = 0.10, p = 0.002) and FTLD-TDP (beta = 0.40, SE = 0.08, p < 0.001). WM degeneration was greater in FTLD-Tau than FTLD-TDP particularly in middle-frontal and anterior cingulate regions (p < 0.05). Distinct regional patterns of WM and GM inclusions characterized FTLD-Tau and FTLD-TDP proteinopathies, and associated in part with clinical phenotype. In FTLD-Tau, WM pathology was particularly severe in the dorsolateral frontal cortex in nonfluent-variant PPA, and GM pathology in dorsolateral and paralimbic frontal regions with some variation across tauopathies. Differently, FTLD-TDP had little WM regional variability, but showed severe GM pathology burden in ventromedial prefrontal regions in both bvFTD and PPA. To conclude, FTLD-Tau and FTLD-TDP proteinopathies have distinct severity and regional distribution of WM and GM pathology, which may impact their clinical presentation, with overall greater severity of WM pathology as a distinguishing feature of tauopathies.

A Practical Approach to Differentiate the Frontotemporal Tauopathy Subtypes.

This study proposes a practical approach, using the minimum number of brain regions and stains, to consolidate previously published neuropathological criteria into one operationalized schema to differentiate subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration with tau-immunopositive inclusions (FTLD-tau). This approach uses the superior frontal and precentral cortices and hippocampus stained for phosphorylated-tau, p62 and modified Bielschowsky silver, and the midbrain stained only for modified Bielschowsky silver. Accuracy of interrater reliability was determined by 10 raters in 24 FTLD-tau cases (Pick disease = 4, corticobasal degeneration = 9, progressive supranuclear palsy = 5, globular glial tauopathy = 6) including 4 with a mutation in MAPT collected with consent by Sydney Brain Bank. All brain regions and stains assessed proved informative for accurate pathological subtyping, and many neuropathological features were identified as common across the FTLD-tau subtypes. By identifying subtype-specific neuropathological features in the sections selected, 10 independent observers assigned the cases to a FTLD-tau subtype with almost perfect agreement between raters, emphasizing the requirement for the assessment of subtype-specific features for the accurate subtyping of FTLD-tau. This study consolidates current consensus diagnostic criteria for classifying FTLD-tau subtypes with an efficient, simple and accurate approach that can be implemented in future clinicopathological studies.

Review: Neuropathology of non-tau frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) as a relatively consistent neuropathological hallmark feature. However, the discoveries in the past decade of many of the relevant pathological proteins aggregating in human FTD brains in addition to several new FTD causing gene mutations underlined that FTD is a diverse condition on the neuropathological and genetic basis. This resulted in a novel molecular classification of these conditions based on the predominant protein abnormality and allows most cases of FTD to be placed now into one of three broad molecular subgroups; FTLD with tau, TAR DNA-binding protein 43 or FET protein accumulation (FTLD-tau, FTLD-TDP and FTLD-FET respectively). This review will provide an overview of the molecular neuropathology of non-tau FTLD, insights into disease mechanisms gained from the study of human post mortem tissue as well as discussion of current controversies in the field.

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: Study of a clinicopathological cohort.

Frontotemporal dementia results from different neurodegenerative diseases heterogeneous from a clinical, neuropathological and genetic point of view. Our main objective was to analyze the sociodemographic, clinical, neuropathological and molecular characteristics of cases with frontotemporal lobar degeneration from different Neurological Tissue Banks. FTD has been considered as a disease with onset below 65. However, diagnosis at higher ages is increasingly common. In our study, there was a correlation between symptoms and disease course with certain neuropathological diagnoses, with different distribution depending on age and sex. Combined pathology with Alzheimer's and vascular pathology was observed and presence of argyrophilic grains, with a different distribution in the different subgroups and a particular clinical and progression phenotype. Low percentage of APOE4 was detected. H1/H1 haplotype of the MAPT gene was the most frequent and appeared in relationship with 4R tauopathies. These results point to biologically significant differences between the different types of FTLD.

Clinical features of the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia that are useful for predicting underlying pathological subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

BACKGROUND: The behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is the most common phenotype of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). FTLD is divided into three main pathological subtypes: tau-positive FTLD (FTLD-tau), FTLD-TAR DNA-binding protein (TDP), and FTLD-Fused in sarcoma (FUS). At present, it is difficult to predict the underlying pathological subtypes of sporadic bvFTD before a patient's death. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated the clinical features of 34 Japanese patients with sporadic bvFTD, with or without motor neuron disease (MND), who had been pathologically diagnosed with FTLD. We examined whether, and how, the clinical features differed among Pick's disease, FTLD-TDP, and FTLD-FUS patients. RESULTS: Six of the 34 patients developed MND during the course of bvFTD. These six bvFTD-MND patients were all pathologically diagnosed with FTLD-TDP. The other 28 patients were composed of 12 FTLD-tau patients including 11 Pick's disease patients, 8 FTLD-TDP patients, and 8 FTLD-FUS patients. A comparison of the clinical features of the three pathological subtypes of the 33 patients demonstrated that the age at onset was significantly younger in FTLD-FUS patients than in Pick's disease or FTLD-TDP patients. Furthermore, while hyperorality and dietary changes in the early stage of the disease were present in approximately 40% of Pick's disease and FTLD-FUS patients, they were absent in FTLD-TDP patients. CONCLUSION: The comorbidity of MND, a younger age at onset, and hyperorality and dietary changes in the early stage may be useful clinical features for predicting underlying pathological subtypes of sporadic bvFTD. The results of our study should be confirmed by prospective studies employing a larger number of cases.

Argyrophilic Grain Pathology in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration: Demographic, Clinical, Neuropathological, and Genetic Features.

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is a clinically, pathologically, and genetically heterogeneous group of disorders that affect the frontal and temporal lobes of the brain. FTLD classification distinguishes three main neuropathological groups: FTLD-tau, FTLD-TDP, and FTLD-FUS. As a four-repeat tauopathy, argyrophilic grain disease (AGD) is included in the FTLD-tau group. AGD may also appear in association with other neuropathological disorders. We describe the demographic, clinical, neuropathological, and genetic characteristics of a series of FTLD cases presenting with AGD. For this purpose, a clinico-pathological study of 71 autopsy-confirmed FTLD cases from different tissue banks was performed. AGD was found in 52.1% of FTLD cases. The presence of AGD increased with the increasing age (up to 88.9% in cases older than 80 years; p < 0.001) and was associated with higher ages at onset (p < 0.001) and death (p < 0.001). In AGD cases, progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) was the most frequent clinical diagnosis (29.7%) and gait disturbance was the most common symptom (64.5%); behavioral and language symptoms were less frequent as compared with non-AGD cases (p = 0.055; p = 0.012). PSP was the most frequent neuropathological diagnosis among cases with AGD (32.4%). This group also showed less brain atrophy (p = 0.094) and higher prevalence of Alzheimer (p = 0.002) and vascular pathology (p = 0.047) as compared to the non-AGD group. We also observed that H1/H1 genotype was overrepresented in AGD cases (p = 0.018) and that there was no association with any specific APOE allele. A subanalysis of PSP cases according to the AGD status was carried out, yielding no significant differences.

Genotype-phenotype links in frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) represents a group of neurodegenerative brain diseases with highly heterogeneous clinical, neuropathological and genetic characteristics. This high degree of heterogeneity results from the presence of several different underlying molecular disease processes; consequently, it is unlikely that all patients with FTLD will benefit from a single therapy. Therapeutic strategies for FTLD are currently being explored, and tools are urgently needed that enable the selection of patients who are the most likely to benefit from a particular therapy. Definition of the phenotypic characteristics in patients with different FTLD subtypes that share the same underlying disease processes would assist in the stratification of patients into homogeneous groups. The most common subtype of FTLD is characterized by TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP43) pathology (FTLD-TDP). In this group, pathogenic mutations have been identified in four genes: C9orf72, GRN, TBK1 and VCP. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of the phenotypic characteristics of patients with FTLD-TDP, highlighting shared features and differences among groups of patients who have a pathogenic mutation in one of these four genes.

A 2-Step Cerebrospinal Algorithm for the Selection of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Subtypes.

Importance: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) core Alzheimer disease (AD) biomarkers have shown an excellent capacity for the in vivo detection of AD. Previous studies have shown that CSF levels of phosphorylated tau (p-tau) also correlate with tau pathology in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) after accounting for AD copathology. Objective: To develop an algorithm based on core AD CSF measures to exclude cases with AD pathology and then differentiate between FTLD-tau and FTLD transactive response DNA-binding protein of approximately 43kDa (FTLD-TDP). Design, Setting, and Participants: A case-control study at the University of Pennsylvania. Participants were selected from a database of 1796 patients included between 1992 and 2016 with different neurodegenerative diseases with available CSF. Three patient cohorts were included: a cohort of patients with sporadic, autopsy-confirmed FTLD and AD (n = 143); a cohort of patients with frontotemporal degeneration (FTD) with TDP-associated or tau-associated mutations (n = 60); and a living cohort of patients with syndromes highly predictive of FTLD (progressive supranuclear palsy and FTD-amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; n = 62). Main Outcomes and Measures: Cerebrospinal fluid values of amyloid ß1-42 (Aß1-42), total tau (t-tau), and p-tau obtained using the INNO-BIA AlzBio3 (xMAP; Luminex) assay or INNOTEST enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay transformed using a previously validated algorithm. Sensitivities and specificities for differentiating AD from FTLD groups were calculated. Results: This autopsy cohort included FTLD-tau (n = 27; mean [SD] age at onset, 60.8 [9.7] years), FTLD-TDP (n = 13; mean [SD] age at onset, 62.4 [8.5] years), AD (n = 89, mean [SD] age at onset, 66.5 [9.7] years); and mixed FTLD-AD (n = 14, mean [SD] age at onset, 70.6 [8.5] years).The p-tau/Aß1-42 ratio showed an excellent diagnostic accuracy to exclude AD cases in the autopsy cohort with single neurodegenerative pathologies (area under the curve [AUC], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.00). Cerebrospinal fluid p-tau levels showed a good AUC (0.87; 95% CI, 0.73-1.00) for discriminating pure FTLD-TDP from pure FTLD-tau. The application of an algorithm using cutpoints of CSF p-tau to Aß1-42 ratio and p-tau allowed a good discrimination of pure FTLD-TDP cases from the remaining FTLD-tau and mixed FTLD cases. The diagnostic value of this algorithm was confirmed in an independent cohort of living patients with progressive supranuclear palsy and FTD-amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (AUC, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.81-0.99). However, the algorithm was less useful in FTD cases carrying a pathogenic mutation (AUC, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.38-0.77) owing to elevated p-tau levels in TDP-associated mutation carriers. Conclusions and Relevance: Alzheimer disease CSF core biomarkers can be used with high specificity for the in vivo identification of patients with pure FTLD-TDP and FTLD-tau when accounting for comorbid AD and genetic status.

The Heritability of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration: Validation of Pedigree Classification Criteria in a Northern Italy Cohort.

A large portion of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) patients has a family history of disease and the presence of a pathogenic mutation confirms the clinical diagnosis. Recently, standardized criteria to evaluate FTLD pedigree, based on first- and second-degree affected relatives, their age at onset, and clinical phenotype, were proposed and validated in an American cohort. Herein we applied these criteria to 402 Italian FTLD pedigrees and assessed mutation frequencies in GRN, C9orf72, and MAPT genes with the aim of validating these criteria. Moreover, we evaluated whether genetic counseling requests reflect the estimated family risk. 12.4% of pedigrees had high family history, 6.5% medium, 15.4% low; 39% were apparent sporadic cases and 26.6% had family history of unknown significance. Mutations frequencies were in line with the categorization proposed: the highest rate was found in the most at-risk families (74%) and decreased in other categories (medium: 15.4%; low: 9.7%; sporadic: 1.3%). Mutation carriers with unknown family history (5.6%) were mostly early-onset patients. Detected mutation frequency was comparable with the US-cohort (13.7%), but mutations distribution among genes was different, with higher frequency of GRN mutations (9.4%) in our cohort. An elevated proportion of FTLD patients belonging to "high risk" pedigrees asked for genetic counseling (42%); requests decreased according to the estimated family risk (medium: 26.9%; low: 17.7%; sporadic: 5.1%). In conclusion, the proposed pedigree classification criteria, herein further validated, should be incorporated in the FTLD diagnostic work-up. Moreover, our data suggest to extend genetic screening to early-onset patients with unknown family history.