Secondary fracture prevention in Spanish primary care: results of the PREFRAOS Study.

This study demonstrated a large treatment gap in elderly subjects experiencing fragility fracture in Spanish primary care, a low treatment persistence among subjects who do receive treatment, and more than one-quarter having no follow-up visits post-fracture. These data highlight the need to improve secondary fracture prevention in primary care. PURPOSE: To describe osteoporosis (OP) treatment patterns and follow-up in subjects with fragility fracture seen in Spanish primary care (PC). METHODS: This observational, retrospective chart review included subjects aged ≥ 70 years listed in the centers' records (November 2018 to March 2020), with ≥ 1 fragility fracture and prior consultation for any reason; subjects who had participated in another study were excluded. Outcomes included OP treatments and follow-up visits post-fragility fracture. RESULTS: Of 665 subjects included, most (87%) were women; overall mean (SD) age, 82 years. Fewer than two thirds (61%) had received any prior OP treatment (women, 65%; men, 38%); of these, 38% had received > 1 treatment (women, 25%; men, 13%). Among treated subjects, the most frequent first-line treatments were alendronate (43%) and RANKL inhibitor denosumab (22%), with a higher discontinuation rate and shorter treatment duration observed for alendronate (discontinuation, 42% vs 16%; median treatment duration, 2.5 vs 2.1 years). Over one-quarter (26%) of subjects had no follow-up visits post-fragility fracture, with this gap higher in women than men (35% versus 25%). The most common schedule of follow-up visits was yearly (43% of subjects with a fragility fracture), followed by half-yearly (17%) and biennial (10%), with a similar trend in men and women. Most OP treatments were prescribed by PC physicians, other than teriparatide and zoledronate. CONCLUSIONS: Across Spanish PC, we observed a large gap in the treatment and follow-up of elderly subjects experiencing a fragility fracture. Our data highlights the urgent need to improve secondary fracture prevention in PC.

Bone loss after discontinuation of denosumab: the devil is in the details.

A 47-year-old postmenopausal woman with osteoporosis was treated with denosumab, which was discontinued due to side effects. She was therefore transitioned to a yearly intravenous infusion of zoledronic acid. An increase in bone turnover markers together with bone loss at the lumbar spine was observed before the second infusion, suggesting an overshooting of bone resorption due to denosumab discontinuation. On physical examination, the patient was restless and reported having lost about 10 kg since the last visit. A solitary left inferior thyroid nodule was noted on neck palpation. Circulating thyroid hormone levels were elevated, with suppressed thyroid-stimulating hormone. A thyroid scan showed increased uptake in the left inferior nodule with suppression of the remainder of the thyroid gland. A diagnosis of hyperthyroidism due to toxic adenoma was made. The patient was treated with radioactive iodine ablation, with consequent complete normalization of thyroid function. She continued yearly treatment with zoledronic acid. She remained clinically well with no further fractures. Bone turnover markers were appropriately suppressed and bone mineral density increased in the spine and hip. This case illustrates how the overshooting phenomenon following denosumab discontinuation may be compounded by the development of secondary conditions, which can result in suboptimal response to antiresorptive osteoporosis medications.

Treatment of Osteoporosis in Men on Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Japan.

Background and Objectives: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer has greatly improved treatment outcomes. As patient survival rates have increased, reports of decreased bone density and increased bone fractures as side effects of ADT have emerged. The prevalence of osteoporosis in Japanese men was 4.6%. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of osteoporosis treatment in prostate cancer patients who underwent ADT in Japan. Materials and Methods: The subjects were 33 male patients who had undergone ADT for prostate cancer, who were noted to have decreased bone density. Mean age was 76.2 ± 7.7 years (64-87). Medications included vitamin D in one case, bisphosphonates (BP) in 27 cases, and denosumab in five cases. The evaluation method examined the rate of change in bone mineral density (BMD) before osteoporosis treatment and 1 year after. For comparison, a group without osteoporosis treatment intervention (n = 33) was selected, and matched for prostate cancer treatment and age. The rate of change in trabecular bone score (TBS) was also calculated. Results: The percentage changes in BMD before and 1 year after treatment were as follows: lumbar spine, 7.1 ± 5.8% in the treatment group versus -3.9 ± 4.1% in the no treatment group; femoral neck, 5.5 ± 6.2% in the treatment group versus -0.9 ± 3.9% in the no treatment group; total femur, 6.6 ± 6.4% in the treatment group versus the no treatment group which was -1.7 ± 3.2%. In all cases, there was a clear significant difference (p < 0.01). The percent change in TBS was further calculated in the same manner. There was no significant difference between the two groups: +1.7 ± 3.8% in the treated group versus +0.3 ± 4.1% in the untreated group. Conclusions: Osteoporosis treatment in Japanese patients with prostate cancer on ADT therapy was found to significantly increase BMD compared to the untreated group. BP and denosumab were found to be very effective in increasing BMD.

The Evaluation and Management of Lung Metastases in Patients with Giant Cell Tumors of Bone in the Denosumab Era.

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is characterized by uncertain biological behavior due to its local aggressiveness and metastasizing potential. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis of the contemporary literature to evaluate all management strategies for GCTB metastases. A combination of the terms "lung metastases", "giant cell tumor", "bone", "treatment", and "oncologic outcomes" returned 133 patients meeting our inclusion criteria: 64 males and 69 females, with a median age of 28 years (7-63), at the onset of primary GCTB. Lung metastases typically occur at a mean interval of 26 months (range: 0-143 months) after treatment of the primary site, commonly presenting as multiple and bilateral lesions. Various treatment approaches, including surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and drug administration, were employed, while 35 patients underwent routine monitoring only. Upon a mean follow-up of about 7 years (range: 1-32 years), 90% of patients were found to be alive, while 10% had died. Death occurred in 25% of patients who had chemotherapy, whereas 96% of those not treated or treated with Denosumab alone were alive at a mean follow-up of 6 years (range: 1-19 years). Given the typically favorable prognosis of lung metastases in patients with GCTB, additional interventions beyond a histological diagnosis confirmation may not be needed. Denosumab, by reducing the progression of the disease, can play a pivotal role in averting or delaying lung failure.

Current Concepts in the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: An Update.

Curettage is recommended for the treatment of Campanacci stages 1-2 giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in the extremities, pelvis, sacrum, and spine, without preoperative denosumab treatment. In the distal femur, bone chips and plate fixation are utilized to reduce damage to the subchondral bone and prevent pathological fracture, respectively. For local recurrence, re-curettage may be utilized when feasible. En bloc resection is an option for very aggressive Campanacci stage 3 GCTB in the extremities, pelvis, sacrum, and spine, combined with 1-3 doses of preoperative denosumab treatment. Denosumab monotherapy once every 3 months is currently the standard strategy for inoperable patients and those with metastatic GCTB. However, in case of tumor growth, a possible malignant transformation should be considered. Zoledronic acid appears to be as effective as denosumab; nevertheless, it is a more cost-effective option. Therefore, zoledronic acid may be an alternative treatment option, particularly in developing countries. Surgery is the mainstay treatment for malignant GCTB.

Characteristics of isatuximab-derived interference in serum protein electrophoresis and immunofixation, and an absence of sustained in vivo interference due to belantamab mafodotin and denosumab.

OBJECTIVES: Some therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, like daratumumab and elotuzumab, produce interfering monoclonal bands on serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE). Whether other common therapeutic antibodies also produce interference has not been systematically evaluated. DESIGN AND METHODS: SPEP/IFE from patients receiving isatuximab (48 patients), belantamab mafodotin (BM; 41), and denosumab (41) were retrospectively reviewed for therapeutic antibody interference. Cases exhibiting isatuximab interference were quantified and the maximum duration of isatuximab effect was evaluated. To characterize band position, neat human serum was spiked with BM or denosumab at supratherapeutic concentrations. Band migration patterns were compared on SPEP and IFE, with band position expressed relative to other constant protein fractions. RESULTS: Isatuximab-induced IFE interference was common (81.3 % of evaluated patients) with a maximum observed duration of 8 weeks. 10.4 % of isatuximab patients had IgG kappa monoclonal gammopathies that co-migrated with the drug; this subset could benefit from HYDRASHIFT 2/4 isatuximab testing. 8.3 % of IFE cases were negative for an isatuximab band but showed large, endogenous M-spikes migrating elsewhere. All patients in this group expired within 1 year of this finding. We hypothesize that an inability to detect isatuximab in this setting corresponds to a large residual myeloma burden that reduces isatuximab serum concentration. This observation may serve as a negative prognostic factor. Spiking studies demonstrated that BM and denosumab produce interference in vitro, but sustained interference was not observed in >40 treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic antibody interference in patients receiving isatuximab is common, and can persist for at least 8 weeks after administration. >10 % of patients receiving isatuximab may benefit from HYDRASHIFT testing post-therapy. In contrast, BM and denosumab fail to produce sustained interference in treated patients.

Denosumab and sclerotherapy for recurrent spinal aneurysmal bone cyst in a child.

Aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) is a non-malignant, locally destructive, blood-filled lesion in the bone that tends to grow aggressively. A young girl presented with a rapid recurrence after aggressive surgery of a large symptomatic sacral-spinal ABC. After a multidisciplinary tumour board, she was successfully treated with sclerotherapy and monthly intravenous denosumab. The patient has maintained asymptomatic for over 36 months now and has returned to full activity and strength. She never required surgery and has had radiologic resolution of the lesions. Treatment of recurrent ABC requires a multidisciplinary team approach. We believe this to be the first report to use this combined therapy to provide an alternative to morbid surgery for children with ABCs.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Denosumab in the Prevention of Skeletal-Related Events Among Patients With Breast Cancer With Bone Metastasis in India.

PURPOSE: Denosumab is clinically superior to zoledronic acid (ZA) for preventing and delaying time to first and subsequent skeletal-related events (SREs) among patients with breast cancer (BC) with bone metastases. We evaluated the cost and health benefits of denosumab and ZA (once every 4 weeks and once every 12 weeks) among four different molecular subtypes of BC with bone metastases in India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model was developed in Microsoft Excel to estimate lifetime health consequences and resulting costs among cohort of 1,000 patients with BC with bone metastasis, for three intervention scenarios, namely denosumab (once every 4 weeks), ZA (once every 4 weeks), and ZA (once every 12 weeks). The health outcomes were measured in terms of SREs averted and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. The cost of each intervention scenario was measured using both the health system and the patient's perspectives. Indirect costs because of lost productivity were not included. The future costs and outcomes were discounted at the standard rate of 3%. RESULTS: Over a lifetime, the incremental number of SREs averted with use of denosumab once every 4 weeks (compared with ZA once every 4 weeks and once every 12 weeks) among patients with luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-enriched, and triple negative breast cancer were estimated as 0.39, 0.26, 0.25, and 0.19, respectively. The number of QALYs lived were slightly higher in the denosumab arm (1.45-2.80) compared with ZA once every 4 weeks and once every 12 weeks arms (1.44-2.78). However, denosumab once every 4 weeks was not found to be a cost-effective alternative for either of the four molecular subtypes of breast cancer. ZA once every 12 weeks was found to be a cost-effective option with an average cost-effectiveness ratio ranging between ₹68,254 and ₹73,636. CONCLUSION: ZA once every 12 weeks is the cost-effective treatment option for BC with bone metastases in India. The present study findings hold significance for standard treatment guidelines under India's government-funded health insurance program.

Assessing EGFR-mutated NSCLC with bone metastasis: Clinical features and optimal treatment strategy.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine the clinical characteristics of bone metastasis (BoM) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and to identify the most effective treatment strategy using EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). METHODS: The study included patients with stage IV EGFR-mutated NSCLC who were receiving first-line treatment with EGFR-TKIs between January 2014 and December 2020. These patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of BoM at the time of initial diagnosis. The BoM group was further subdivided based on whether they received denosumab or not. RESULTS: The final analysis included 247 patients. Those with BoM at initial diagnosis had shorter progression-free survival (12.6 vs. 10.5 months, p = 0.002) and overall survival (OS) (49.7 vs. 30.9 months, p = 0.002) compared to those without BoM. There was a difference in the location of metastatic sites between the two groups, with a higher incidence of extrathoracic metastasis in the BoM group (p < 0.001). The incidence of T790M was higher in patients with BoM than in those without (47.4% vs. 33.9%, p = 0.042). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that sequential osimertinib treatment and the addition of antiangiogenic therapy (AAT) and denosumab therapy improved OS in patients with BoM. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of BoM is a negative prognostic factor for NSCLC patients with an EGFR mutation, possibly due to the presence of extrathoracic metastases. However, adding AAT and denosumab, along with sequential osimertinib, to the treatment regimen for patients with BoM can improve survival outcomes.

Treatment of bone metastases from solid tumors with bone-modifying agents: a web survey of Italian oncologists investigating patterns of practice drug prescription and prevention of side effects.

PURPOSE: Optimal use of bone-modifying agents (BMAs) in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors is uncertain in some aspects: the drug choice; the planned treatment duration and long-term therapy; the prevention and management of possible side effects, including renal toxicity, hypocalcaemia, and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). METHODS: Italian oncologists were invited to fulfil a 24-question web survey about prescription of BMAs for bone metastases of breast cancer, prostate cancer, and other solid tumors. Prevention and management of side effects were also investigated. RESULTS: Answers of 191 oncologists were collected. BMAs are usually prescribed at the time of diagnosis of bone metastases by 87.0% (breast cancer) and 76.1% (solid tumors except breast and prostate cancers) of oncologists; the decision is more articulated for prostate cancer (endocrine-sensitive versus castration-resistant). The creatinine level (32.3%), the availability of patient venous access (15.8%), and the type of primary neoplasm (13.6%) are the most reported factors involved in choice between bisphosphonates and denosumab. Zoledronic acid every 3 months was considered as a valid alternative to monthly administration by 94% of Italian oncologists. Oncologists reported a good confidence with measures aimed to prevent MRONJ, whereas uncertainness about prevention and management of hypocalcemia was registered. CONCLUSION: Italian oncologists showed a high attitude in prescribing bisphosphonates or denosumab at the time of diagnosis of bone metastases, with a large application of preventive measures of side effects. Further studies are needed to investigate some controversial aspects, such as optimal drug treatment duration and long-term drug schedules.

Association between pharmacotherapy and secondary vertebral fracture managed with a brace in a real-world setting: A nationwide database study in Japan.

AIM: This retrospective cohort study assessed the association between the incidence of secondary vertebral fracture managed with a brace (SVF) and pharmacotherapy. METHODS: The association between the incidence of SVF and the presence, type, and medication possession ratio (MPR) of pharmacotherapy was investigated using medical insurance data acquired from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan. RESULTS: The data of female patients (n = 637 303) were analyzed. The 2-year incidence of SVF was 73.5 per 10 000 patients (n = 4687). Approximately 0.73% of patients without medications and 0.74% with medications had SVF. Patients taking bisphosphonates (0.87), denosumab (0.77), and selective estrogen receptor modulators (0.88) had significantly lower standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) than patients not taking medications after the occurrence of primary fracture; meanwhile, patients taking parathyroid hormone medications had considerably higher SIRs than those not taking medications. The non-SVF group (59.1%) had a significantly higher mean MPR than the SVF group (55.5%). Patients taking denosumab in the non-SVF group (68.2%) had the highest mean MPR. The proportion of patients taking denosumab with an MPR of ≥80% in the non-SVF group was significantly higher than that in the SVF group. CONCLUSION: Patients taking medications were at a lower risk of developing SVF than those not taking medications. Although this study did not compare the medications' SVF prevention effects, patients taking denosumab had a 0.77 SIR of SVF in Japan. The effect of pharmacotherapy on SVF prevention might be affected by the MPR of each medication. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 390-397.

3D-modeling from hip DXA shows improved bone structure with romosozumab followed by denosumab or alendronate.

Romosozumab treatment in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis increases bone formation while decreasing bone resorption, resulting in large BMD gains to reduce fracture risk within 1 yr. DXA-based 3D modeling of the hip was used to assess estimated changes in cortical and trabecular bone parameters and map the distribution of 3D changes in bone parameters over time in patients from 2 randomized controlled clinical trials: FRAME (romosozumab vs placebo followed by denosumab) and ARCH (romosozumab vs alendronate followed by alendronate). For each study, data from a subset of ~200 women per treatment group who had TH DXA scans at baseline and months 12 and 24 and had provided consent for future research were analyzed post hoc. 3D-SHAPER software v2.11 (3D-SHAPER Medical) was used to generate patient-specific 3D models from TH DXA scans. Percentage changes from baseline to months 12 and 24 in areal BMD (aBMD), integral volumetric BMD (vBMD), cortical thickness, cortical vBMD, cortical surface BMD (sBMD), and trabecular vBMD were evaluated. Data from 377 women from FRAME (placebo, 190; romosozumab, 187) and 368 women from ARCH (alendronate, 185; romosozumab, 183) with evaluable 3D assessments at baseline and months 12 and 24 were analyzed. At month 12, treatment with romosozumab vs placebo in FRAME and romosozumab vs alendronate in ARCH resulted in greater increases in aBMD, integral vBMD, cortical thickness, cortical vBMD, cortical sBMD, and trabecular vBMD (P < .05 for all). At month 24, cumulative gains in all parameters were greater in the romosozumab-to-denosumab vs placebo-to-denosumab sequence and romosozumab-to-alendronate vs alendronate-to-alendronate sequence (P < .05 for all). 3D-SHAPER analysis provides a novel technique for estimating changes in cortical and trabecular parameters from standard hip DXA images. These data add to the accumulating evidence that romosozumab improves hip bone density and structure, thereby contributing to the antifracture efficacy of the drug.

Osteoporosis is a chronic condition in which bones become weak and are more likely to break (fracture) with minimal force such as tripping or falling. A fracture, especially in the elderly, is a serious condition that affects daily activities and quality of life. Romosozumab, an approved medication for patients with osteoporosis, increases bone mass and bone strength thereby reducing fracture risk. In this study, 3D reproductions of patients' hip bones were generated from standard images of a bone density test with DXA from women in the FRAME clinical trial where they received romosozumab or placebo for 12 mo followed by 12 mo of denosumab or the ARCH clinical trial where they received romosozumab or alendronate for 12 mo, followed by 12 mo of alendronate. We found that patients treated with romosozumab for the first 12 mo had significantly greater increases in bone strength compared with those who received placebo or alendronate. After 24 mo, total gains in bone strength measurements were greater in patients treated with romosozumab first. Our study shows that DXA-based 3D modelling provides a novel technique for examining changes in bone strength and supports the use of romosozumab to improve hip bone strength and reduce fracture risk.

The efficacy of Denosumab in the treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis: a retrospective comparative study.

The present study aimed to compare clinical and radiological differences of ONFH patients who were treated with denosumab, and a control group. A total of 178 patients (272 hips) with symptomatic, nontraumatic ONFH were divided into a denosumab group (98 patients, 146 hips) and a control group (80 patients, 126 hips). Patients in the denosumab group received a 60 mg subcutaneous dose of denosumab every 6 months. For the clinical assessments, Harris hip scores (HHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were evaluated. Plain radiographs and MRI were performed before and a minimum of 1 year after administration of denosumab, which were evaluated for radiological results including femoral head collapse (≥ 2 mm) and volume change of necrotic lesion. Femoral head collapse occurred in 36 hips (24.7%) in the denosumab group, and 48 hips (38.1%) in the control group, which was statistically significant (P = 0.012). Twenty-three hips (15.8%) in the denosumab group and 29 hips (23%) in the control group required THA, which showed no significant difference (P = 0.086). At the final follow-up, 71.9% of hips in the denosumab group had a good or excellent HHS compared with 48.9% in the control group, showing a significant difference (P = 0.012). The denosumab group showed a significantly higher rate of necrotic lesion volume reductions compared with the control group (P < 0.001). Denosumab can significantly reduce the volume of necrotic lesions and prevent femoral head collapse in patients with ARCO stage I or II ONFH.

Using Denosumab as a Nonsurgical Management of Aneurysmal Bone Cysts in the Pelvis.

Background: Aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) are infrequent, benign, and locally destructive lesions that most commonly occur during the first two decades of life. They usually affect the metaphysis of the long bones, but the pelvis is involved in 8%-12% of the cases. The management of pelvic ABCs is a challenging issue due to difficulties in choosing the appropriate approach, adjacent neurovascular bundles, the risk of intraoperative bleeding with difficulty achieving good hemostasis, and the risk of injury to the hip or sacroiliac joints. Limited data exist concerning the use of denosumab as a non-surgical treatment for pelvic ABCs. Our hypothesis was that denosumab might be an effective and safe solo treatment of cases with ABCs in the pelvis. Methods: We retrospectively assessed 20 patients with ABCs in the pelvis, who were treated by denosumab as a solo agent without surgery. Patients were assessed regarding disease control, the incidence of recurrence and non-oncological complications, and functional outcome. Results: The mean follow-up period was 38.5 months. Disease control was achieved in 16 patients (80%), with no local recurrence. Tolerable drug-related complications occurred in 15% of cases. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 92.3%. Conclusions: Denosumab may provide a reliable option in the nonsurgical treatment of ABCs of pelvic origin with expected lower morbidity than the surgical solution and tolerable complications. Further studies on the safety profile and long-term effects of denosumab especially in skeletally immature patients are required.

Immunomodulatory Effects of RANK/RANKL Blockade in Patients with Cancer.

In cancer, multiple factors converge upon receptor activator of nuclear factor κB (RANK) and its ligand (RANKL) signaling to promote the development of bone metastases; agents that inhibit RANKL signaling reduce skeletal-related events (SRE) in patients with cancer. In addition, RANKL signaling is important in augmenting the ability of dendritic cells (DC) to stimulate both naïve T-cell proliferation and the survival of RANK+ T cells. In this issue, Chang and colleagues using high-dimensional cytometry to evaluate immunomodulatory effects of denosumab in patients with advanced solid, observe early on treatment changes in multiple compartments, and greater effects in patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy or steroids. See related article by Chang et al., p. 453 (4).

Denosumab Decreases Epicardial Adipose Tissue Attenuation in Dialysis Patients with Secondary Hyperparathyroidism and Low Bone Mass.

INTRODUCTION: Denosumab preceding elective surgery is an alternative option when parathyroidectomy is not immediately possible. Denosumab (an osteoprotegerin mimic) may play a role in the cardiovascular system, which is reflected in the features of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) and coronary artery calcification (CAC). METHODS: We investigated the effects of denosumab on EAT attenuation (EATat) and CAC in dialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). This cohort study included patients on dialysis with SHPT. The baseline characteristics of dialysis patients and propensity score-matched non-dialysis patients were compared. Computed tomography scans of the dialysis patients (dialysis group with denosumab, n = 24; dialysis group without denosumab, n = 21) were obtained at baseline and at 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: At baseline, the dialysis group patients had a higher EATat-median (-71.00 H ± 10.38 vs. -81.60 H ± 6.03; p < 0.001) and CAC (1,223 A [248.50-3,315] vs. 7 A [0-182.5]; p < 0.001) than the non-dialysis group. At follow-up, the dialysis group without denosumab showed an increase in Agatston score (1,319.50 A [238.00-2,587.50] to 1,552.00 A [335.50-2,952.50]; p = 0.001) without changes in EATat-median (-71.33 H ± 11.72 to -70.86 H ± 12.67; p = 0.15). The dialysis group with denosumab showed no change in Agatston score (1,132.2 A [252.25-3,260.5] to 1,199.50 A [324.25-2,995]; p = 0.19) but a significant decrease of EATat-median (-70.71 H ± 9.30 to -74.33 H ± 10.28; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab may reverse EATat and retard CAC progression in dialysis patients with SHPT.

[Metabolic bone diseases : what's new in 2023]. / Maladies osseuses : ce qui a changé en 2023.

The sequential effects of romosozumab and denosumab in osteoporosis are shown in real-life, while the mechanisms of post-denosumab rebound are reviewed extensively. A network meta-analysis confirms the superiority of anabolics vs anti-resorptives on fracture reduction, while the latter shown a reduction of mortality in a large population-based study. Fracture risk prediction by FRAXPlus is improved. New meta-analyses confirm the benefits of Vitamin D on fractures and falls. Finally, multiples trials with new molecules for the treatment of rare bone diseases, including osteogenesis imperfecta, fibrous dysplasia and hypoparathyroidism, shown promising results.

Dans l'ostéoporose, les effets séquentiels du romosozumab et du dénosumab se précisent et les mécanismes du rebond à l'arrêt de ce dernier font l'objet d'une revue détaillée. Une méta-analyse en réseau confirme la supériorité des traitements anaboliques sur les antirésorbtifs, alors que l'effet de ces derniers sur la réduction de la mortalité est démontré dans une large étude populationnelle. La prédiction du risque fracturaire est améliorée par l'outil FRAXPlus. De nouvelles méta-analyses des bénéfices de la vitamine D sur le risque de fractures et de chutes sont également disponibles. Enfin, de nombreuses études encourageantes sur l'efficacité de nouveaux traitements dans de multiples maladies osseuse rares, telles l'ostéogenèse imparfaite, la dysplasie fibreuse et l'hypoparathyroïdie, ont été publiées.

Denosumab and the Risk of Diabetes in Patients Treated for Osteoporosis.

Importance: Denosumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL), is a widely used antiresorptive medication for osteoporosis treatment. Recent preclinical studies indicate that inhibition of RANKL signaling improves insulin sensitivity, glucose tolerance, and ß-cell proliferation, suggesting that denosumab may improve glucose homeostasis; however, whether denosumab reduces the risk of incident diabetes remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate whether denosumab use is associated with a lower risk of developing diabetes in patients with osteoporosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide, propensity score-matched cohort study used administrative data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Adult patients who received denosumab for osteoporosis therapy in Taiwan between 2012 and 2019 were included. To eliminate the inherent bias from confounding by indication, the patients were categorized into a treatment group (34 255 patients who initiated denosumab treatment and adhered to it) and a comparison group (34 255 patients who initiated denosumab treatment but discontinued it after the initial dose) according to the administration status of the second dose of denosumab. Propensity score matching was performed to balance patient characteristics and to control for confounders. Exposure: Treatment with denosumab. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was incident diabetes requiring treatment with antidiabetic drugs. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for incident diabetes. Data were analyzed from January 1 to November 30, 2023. Results: After propensity score matching, 68 510 patients were included (mean [SD] age, 77.7 [9.8] years; 57 762 [84.3%] female). During a mean (SD) follow-up of 1.9 (1.6) years, 2016 patients developed diabetes in the treatment group and 3220 developed diabetes in the comparison group (incidence rate, 35.9 vs 43.6 per 1000 person-years). Compared with the comparison group, denosumab treatment was associated with a lower risk of incident diabetes (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.78-0.90). Several sensitivity analyses also demonstrated similar results of lower diabetes risk associated with denosumab treatment. Conclusions and relevance: The results from this cohort study indicating that denosumab treatment was associated with lower risk of incident diabetes may help physicians choose an appropriate antiosteoporosis medication for patients with osteoporosis while also considering the risk of diabetes.

Effect of Osteoporosis Treatments on Osteoarthritis Progression in Postmenopausal Women: A Review of the Literature.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this literature review was to determine if medications used to treat osteoporosis are also effective for treating osteoarthritis (OA). RECENT FINDINGS: A total of 40 relevant articles were identified. Studies were categorized into those (1) discussing estrogen and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), (2) bisphosphonates, (3) parathyroid hormone (PTH) analogs, and (4) denosumab, and (5) prior review articles. A large amount of evidence suggests that estrogen and SERMs are effective at reducing OA symptoms and disease progression. Evidence suggests that bisphosphonates, the most common medications used to treat osteoporosis, can reduce OA symptoms and disease progression. In vivo studies suggest that PTH analogs may improve the cartilage destruction associated with OA; however, few human trials have examined its use for OA. Denosumab is approved to treat osteoporosis, bone metastases, and certain types of breast cancer, but little study has been done with respect to its effect on OA. The current evidence indicates that medications used to treat osteoporosis are also effective for treating OA. Estrogen, SERMs, and bisphosphonates have the most potential as OA therapies. Less is known regarding the effectiveness of PTH analogs and denosumab in OA, and more research is needed.