Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 723
Filtrar
1.
J Affect Disord ; 357: 60-67, 2024 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38642903

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Women's mental health during the perinatal period is a major public health problem in Pakistan. Many challenges and competing priorities prevent progress to address the large treatment gap. Aim To quantify the long-term impacts of untreated perinatal depression and anxiety in economic terms, thus highlighting its overall burden based on country-specific evidence. METHODS: Cost estimates were generated for a hypothetical cohort of women giving birth in 2017, and their children. Women and children experiencing adverse events linked to perinatal mental health problems were modelled over 40 years. Costs assigned to adverse events included were those linked to losses in quantity and quality-of-life, productivity, and healthcare-related expenditure. Present values were derived using a discount rate of 3 %. Data were taken from published cohort studies, as well as from sources of population, economic and health indicators. RESULTS: The total costs were $16.5 billion for the cohort and $2680 per woman giving birth. The by far largest proportion referred to quality-of-life losses ($15.8 billion). Productivity losses and out-of-pocket expenditure made up only a small proportion of the costs, due to low wages and market prices. When the costs of maternal suicide were included, total costs increased to $16.6 billion. LIMITATIONS: Important evidence gaps prevented the inclusion of all cost consequences linked to perinatal mental health problems. CONCLUSIONS: Total national costs are much higher compared with those in other, higher middle-income countries, reflecting the excessive disease burden. This study is an important first step to inform resource allocations.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Paquistão/epidemiologia , Feminino , Gravidez , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Ansiedade/economia , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Depressão/economia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Países em Desenvolvimento , Complicações na Gravidez/economia , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes
2.
J Clin Sleep Med ; 20(5): 817-819, 2024 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38205933

RESUMO

Obstructive sleep apnea and depression are highly comorbid among older adults, and each is associated with increased economic costs and health care resource utilization. The purpose of this study was to determine the economic burden of comorbid occult obstructive sleep apnea among a random sample of older adult Medicare beneficiaries in the United States. Among 41,500 participants with preexisting depression and meeting inclusion criteria, 4,573 (11%) had occult OSA. In fully adjusted models, beneficiaries with occult OSA were heavier users of inpatient (rate ratio: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.39, 1.67), outpatient (rate ratio: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.27), emergency department (rate ratio: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.35, 1.63), and prescription (rate ratio: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.14) services. Mean total costs were also significantly higher among beneficiaries with occult OSA ($44,390; 95% CI: $32,076, $56,703). CITATION: Wickwire EM, Albrecht JS. Occult, undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea is associated with increased health care resource utilization and costs among older adults with comorbid depression: a retrospective cohort study among Medicare beneficiaries. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(5):817-819.


Assuntos
Comorbidade , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Medicare , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono , Humanos , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/economia , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/economia , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/economia , Estudos de Coortes , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos em Saúde/economia
3.
BMC Public Health ; 23(1): 1404, 2023 07 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37474894

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Few prior studies have investigated the income gradient in child mental health from a socio-environmental perspective. In an age when child mental health problems in a rapidly changing social environment have become a worldwide issue, an understanding of the socio-environmental mechanisms of the income disparities in child mental health outcomes is imperative and cost-effective. METHODS: By conducting structural equation analyses with Chinese nationally representative survey data, this study explored the family income gradient in child depression and its potential socio-environmental pathways at the neighborhood, family and school levels, differentiating left-behind and not-left-behind children. RESULTS: We found a robust family income gradient in depressive symptoms. Neighborhood cohesion mitigated the income gradient in depressive symptoms by playing a suppression role. School social capital acted as a mediator. Neighborhood trust, neighborhood safety and family social capital played no significant impact. The mitigating and mediating roles of social capital components were significant among only the not-left-behind children. CONCLUSIONS: To reduce income-related inequalities in child mental health in the long run, integrating policies that directly reduce poverty with policies that improve distal socio-environments is necessary.


Assuntos
Saúde da Criança , Depressão , Separação da Família , Renda , Saúde Mental , Capital Social , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Criança , Humanos , Depressão/economia , Depressão/psicologia , População do Leste Asiático/psicologia , Saúde Mental/economia , Saúde da Criança/economia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/economia , Fatores Socioeconômicos
4.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37047977

RESUMO

Single motherhood and poverty have a significant, negative impact on mothers and their children. When their mothers experience maternal distress, adolescent children have to take up more instrumental and emotional filial responsibilities to comfort their mother and adapt to related changes. Based on 325 mother-child dyads of Chinese single-mother families experiencing economic disadvantage, this study examined the relationship between maternal distress and adolescent mental health problems (indexed by anxiety and depression) and the moderating roles of instrumental and emotional filial responsibilities. Results indicated that maternal distress was positively associated with anxiety and depression in adolescent children. In addition, instrumental filial responsibility intensified the associations of maternal distress with adolescent anxiety and depression. Moreover, the moderating role of emotional filial responsibility in the predictive relationship between maternal distress and adolescent anxiety was different in boys and girls. Adolescent girls with more emotional filial responsibility reported higher adolescent anxiety than did those who shouldered less emotional filial responsibility when their mother exhibited more distress, whereas the relationship between maternal distress and adolescent anxiety was stable in boys, regardless of emotional filial responsibility. In short, the present study showed that parentification was likely to occur in poor Chinese single-mother families, and adolescent children who took up a more caregiving role in the family exhibited poorer mental health. Family counselling and tangible support for single-mother families experiencing economic disadvantage are urged.


Assuntos
População do Leste Asiático , Saúde Mental , Relações Mãe-Filho , Mães , Pobreza , Família Monoparental , Adolescente , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , População do Leste Asiático/psicologia , Emoções , Saúde Mental/economia , Relações Mãe-Filho/psicologia , Mães/psicologia , Família Monoparental/psicologia , Pobreza/economia , Pobreza/psicologia , Pobreza Infantil/economia , Pobreza Infantil/psicologia , China , Ansiedade/economia , Ansiedade/psicologia , Depressão/economia , Depressão/psicologia , Saúde do Adolescente/economia , Sobrecarga do Cuidador/economia , Sobrecarga do Cuidador/psicologia
5.
J Consult Clin Psychol ; 89(8): 657-667, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34472893

RESUMO

Objective: To evaluate the costs and cost-effectiveness of Shamiri-Digital, an online single-session intervention (SSI) for depression among Kenyan adolescents. Method: Data were drawn from a randomized clinical trial with n = 103 Kenyan high school students (64% female, Mage = 15.5). All students were eligible to participate, regardless of baseline depression symptomatology. We estimated delivery costs in 2020 U.S. dollars from multiple perspectives. To account for uncertainty, we performed sensitivity analyses with different cost assumptions and definitions of effectiveness. Using number needed to treat (NNT) estimates, we also evaluated the cost required to achieve a clinically meaningful reduction in depressive symptoms. Results: In the base-case (the most realistic cost estimate), it costs U.S. $3.57 per student to deliver Shamiri-Digital. Depending on the definition of clinically meaningful improvement, 7.1-9.7 students needed to receive the intervention for one student to experience a clinically meaningful improvement, which translated to a cost of U.S. $25.35 to U.S. $34.62 per student. Under a worst-case scenario (i.e., assuming the highest treatment cost and the strictest effectiveness definition), the cost to achieve clinically meaningful improvement was U.S. $92.05 per student. Conclusions: Shamiri-Digital is a low-cost intervention for reducing depression symptomatology. The public health benefit of empirically supported SSIs is especially important in low-income countries, where funding for mental health care is most limited. Future research can compare the cost-effectiveness of online SSIs to higher-cost treatments and estimate the robustness of Shamiri-Digital's effects over a longer time horizon. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Depressão/terapia , Intervenção Baseada em Internet/economia , Adolescente , Depressão/economia , Depressão/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Quênia , Masculino , Estudantes/psicologia
6.
Value Health ; 24(6): 780-788, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34119075

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Smoking is a leading cause of death worldwide. Cessation aids include varenicline, bupropion, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and e-cigarettes at various doses (low, standard and high) and used alone or in combination with each other. Previous cost-effectiveness analyses have not fully accounted for adverse effects nor compared all cessation aids. The objective was to determine the relative cost-effectiveness of cessation aids in the United Kingdom. METHODS: An established Markov cohort model was adapted to incorporate health outcomes and costs due to depression and self-harm associated with cessation aids, alongside other health events. Relative efficacy in terms of abstinence and major adverse neuropsychiatric events was informed by a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Base case results are reported for UK-licensed interventions only. Two sensitivity analyses are reported, one including unlicensed interventions and another comparing all cessation aids but removing the impact of depression and self-harm. The sensitivity of conclusions to model inputs was assessed by calculating the expected value of partial perfect information. RESULTS: When limited to UK-licensed interventions, varenicline standard-dose and NRT standard-dose were most cost-effective. Including unlicensed interventions, e-cigarette low-dose appeared most cost-effective followed by varenicline standard-dose + bupropion standard-dose combined. When the impact of depression and self-harm was excluded, varenicline standard-dose + NRT standard-dose was most cost-effective, followed by varenicline low-dose + NRT standard-dose. CONCLUSION: Although found to be most cost-effective, combined therapy is currently unlicensed in the United Kingdom and the safety of e-cigarettes remains uncertain. The value-of-information analysis suggested researchers should continue to investigate the long-term effectiveness and safety outcomes of e-cigarettes in studies with active comparators.


Assuntos
Depressão/epidemiologia , Custos de Medicamentos , Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina/economia , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/epidemiologia , Agentes de Cessação do Hábito de Fumar/efeitos adversos , Agentes de Cessação do Hábito de Fumar/economia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/economia , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco/efeitos adversos , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco/economia , Bupropiona/efeitos adversos , Bupropiona/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Depressão/economia , Depressão/psicologia , Humanos , Cadeias de Markov , Modelos Econômicos , Método de Monte Carlo , Metanálise em Rede , Agonistas Nicotínicos/efeitos adversos , Agonistas Nicotínicos/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Recidiva , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/economia , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/psicologia , Fumar/economia , Fumar/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Vareniclina/efeitos adversos , Vareniclina/economia
7.
Lancet Psychiatry ; 8(6): 487-499, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34000240

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The UK Government's implementation in 2008 of the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) initiative in England has hugely increased the availability of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for the treatment of depression and anxiety in primary care. Counselling for depression-a form of person-centred experiential therapy (PCET)-has since been included as an IAPT-approved therapy, but there is no evidence of its efficacy from randomised controlled trials (RCTs), as required for recommendations by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Therefore, we aimed to examine whether PCET is cost effective and non-inferior to CBT in the treatment of moderate and severe depression within the IAPT service. METHODS: This pragmatic, randomised, non-inferiority trial was done in the Sheffield IAPT service in England and recruited participants aged 18 years or older with moderate or severe depression on the Clinical Interview Schedule-Revised. We excluded participants presenting with an organic condition, a previous diagnosis of personality disorder, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia, drug or alcohol dependency, an elevated clinical risk of suicide, or a long-term physical condition. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1), independently of the research team, and stratified by site with permuted block sizes of two, four, or six, to receive either PCET or CBT by use of a remote, web-based system that revealed therapy after patient details were entered. Those assessing outcomes were masked to treatment allocation. Participants were seen by appropriately trained PCET counsellors and CBT therapists in accordance with the IAPT service delivery model. Depression severity and symptomatology measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) at 6 months post-randomisation was the primary outcome, with the PHQ-9 score at 12 months post-randomisation being a key secondary outcome. These outcomes were analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which comprised all randomly assigned patients with complete data, and the per-protocol population, which comprised all participants who did not switch from their randomised treatment and received between four and 20 sessions. Safety was analysed in all randomly assigned patients. The non-inferiority margin was set a priori at 2 PHQ-9 points. Patient safety was monitored throughout the course of therapy, adhering to service risk procedures for monitoring serious adverse events. This trial is registered at the ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN06461651, and is complete. FINDINGS: From Nov 11, 2014, to Aug 3, 2018, 9898 patients were referred to step three treatments in the Sheffield IAPT service for common mental health problems, of whom 761 (7·7%) were referred to the trial. Of these, we recruited and randomly assigned 510 participants to receive either PCET (n=254) or CBT (n=256). In the PCET group, 138 (54%) participants were female and 116 (46%) were male, and 225 (89%) were White, 16 (6%) were non-White, and 13 (5%) had missing ethnicity data. In the CBT group, 155 (61%) participants were female and 101 (39%) were male, and 226 (88%) were White, 17 (7%) were non-White, and 13 (5%) had missing ethnicity data. The 6-month modified intention-to-treat analysis comprised 401 (79%) of the enrolled participants (201 in the PCET group; 200 in the CBT group) and the 12-month modified intention-to-treat analysis comprised 319 participants (167 in the PCET group; 152 in the CBT group). The 6-month per-protocol analysis comprised 298 participants (154 in the PCET group; 144 in the CBT group). At 6 months post-randomisation, PCET was non-inferior to CBT in the intention-to-treat population (mean PHQ-9 score 12·74 [SD 6·54] in the PCET group and 13·25 [6·35] in the CBT group; adjusted mean difference -0·35 [95% CI -1·53 to 0·84]) and in the per-protocol population (12·73 [SD 6·57] in the PCET group and 12·71 [6·33] in the CBT group; 0·27 [95% CI -1·08 to 1·62]). At 12 months post-randomisation, there was a significant adjusted between-group difference in mean PHQ-9 score in favour of CBT (1·73 [95% CI 0·26-3·19]), with a 95% CI exceeding the 2-point non-inferiority margin. There were two deaths, one death by suicide in the PCET group and one due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the CBT group. Both were assessed by the responsible clinician to be unrelated to the trial. In terms of using emergency departments for depression-related events, four people (three in the PCET group; one in the CBT group) made more than a single use and six people (three in the PCET group; three in the CBT group) made a single use. One patient in the PCET group had inpatient treatment for a depression-related event. INTERPRETATION: This trial is the first to examine the two most frequently administered psychological therapies in the IAPT service. The finding of non-inferiority of PCET to CBT at 6 months supports the results from large, routine, non-randomised datasets from the IAPT programme. Given the high demand for psychological therapies and the need for patient choice, our findings suggest the need for continued investment in the training and delivery of PCET for improving short-term outcomes, but suggest that PCET might be inferior to CBT at 12 months. FUNDING: British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy Research Foundation.


Assuntos
Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/economia , Depressão/terapia , Psicoterapia Centrada na Pessoa/economia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Adulto , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Análise Custo-Benefício , Depressão/economia , Depressão/psicologia , Inglaterra , Feminino , Humanos , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
8.
Daru ; 29(1): 217-221, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33715138

RESUMO

The social restrictions amid coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have posed a serious threat to mental health and have implications in the use of medications for mental health including antidepressants (ADs). This study investigated the trends in prescriptions and costs of various ADs in England during COVID-19 pandemic. National prescribing rates and net ingredient costs (NIC) of all ADs prescriptions during 2016 to 2020 were analyed. The total number of ADs prescriptions dispensed during COVID-19 pandemic (January to December 2020) were 78 million, 4 million more than in 2019 that costed NHS England £ 139 million more than in 2019. Sertraline, an SSRI antidepressant drug, alone accounted for an extra £113 million during 2020 than in 2019. The peak dispensing for ADs was observed in March 2020 while the total costs for AD drugs peaked in April 2020. The rising prescription costs for ADs during COVID-19 pandemic is a potential cause of concern, in particular the increasing use in adolescents and younger adults needs attention, who are at a higher risk of life-threatening adverse drug reactions.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos/economia , COVID-19/economia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Custos de Medicamentos/tendências , Prescrições de Medicamentos/economia , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Depressão/economia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Humanos
9.
Neuroimage ; 231: 117865, 2021 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33592242

RESUMO

Adolescents comprise one fourth of the world's population, with about 90% of them living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The incidence of depression markedly increases during adolescence, making the disorder a leading cause of disease-related disability in this age group. However, most research on adolescent depression has been performed in high-income countries (HICs). To ascertain the extent to which this disparity operates in neuroimaging research, a systematic review of the literature was performed. A total of 148 studies were identified, with neuroimaging data available for 4,729 adolescents with depression. When stratified by income group, 122 (82%) studies originated from HICs, while 26 (18%) were conducted in LMICs, for a total of 3,705 and 1,024 adolescents with depression respectively. A positive Spearman rank correlation was observed between country per capita income and sample size (rs=0.673, p = 0.023). Our results support the previous reports showing a large disparity between the number of studies and the adolescent population per world region. Future research comparing neuroimaging findings across populations from HICs and LMICs may provide unique insights to enhance our understanding of the neurobiological processes underlying the development of depression.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/métodos , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Depressão/diagnóstico por imagem , Países em Desenvolvimento , Saúde Global , Neuroimagem/métodos , Adolescente , Comportamento do Adolescente , Pesquisa Biomédica/economia , Pesquisa Biomédica/tendências , Bases de Dados Factuais/economia , Bases de Dados Factuais/tendências , Depressão/economia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Países em Desenvolvimento/economia , Saúde Global/economia , Saúde Global/tendências , Humanos , Neuroimagem/economia , Neuroimagem/tendências , Fatores de Risco
10.
Value Health ; 24(2): 216-226, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33518028

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The Depression Care for People with Cancer program (DCPC) is a cost-effective depression care model for UK patients with cancer. However, DCPC's cost-effectiveness in the United States is unknown, particularly for patients with prostate cancer in the United States. This study evaluates the health and economic impact of providing DCPC to patients with prostate cancer. METHODS: DCPC was compared with usual care in a mathematical model that simulates depression and its outcomes in a hypothetical cohort of US patients with prostate cancer. DCPC was modeled as a sequential combination of universal depression screening, post-screening evaluations, and first-line combination therapy. Primary outcomes were lifetime direct costs of depression care, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Secondary outcomes included life expectancy, number of depression-free months and lifetime depressive episodes, duration of depressive episodes, cumulative incidence of depression, lifetime depression diagnoses/misdiagnoses, and the cumulative incidence of maintenance therapy for depression. Sensitivity analyses were used to examine uncertainty. RESULTS: In the base case, DCPC dominated usual care by offering 0.11 more QALYs for $2500 less per patient (from averted misdiagnoses). DCPC also offered 5 extra depression-free months, shorter depressive episodes, and a lower chance of maintenance therapy. DCPC's trade-offs were a higher cumulative incidence of depression and more lifetime depressive episodes. Life expectancy was identical under usual care and DCPC. Sensitivity analyses indicate that DCPC was almost always preferable to usual care. CONCLUSION: Compared with usual care, DCPC may offer more value to US patients with prostate cancer. DCPC should be considered for inclusion in prostate cancer survivorship care guidelines.


Assuntos
Depressão/etiologia , Depressão/terapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/complicações , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antidepressivos/economia , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Depressão/economia , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Expectativa de Vida , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Teóricos , Psicoterapia/economia , Psicoterapia/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Estados Unidos
11.
J Neurovirol ; 27(1): 168-170, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33405207

RESUMO

People living with HIV (PLWH) may be at higher risk for adverse outcomes indirectly associated with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). When comparing responses to questionnaires administered when social distancing and quarantine guidelines were first implemented, we found that PLWH were more likely to have restricted access to medical care, increased financial stress, increased symptoms of anxiety and depression, and increased substance use compared to demographically-similar people without HIV.


Assuntos
Ansiedade/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Ansiedade/economia , Ansiedade/psicologia , Ansiedade/virologia , COVID-19/economia , COVID-19/psicologia , COVID-19/virologia , Comorbidade , Depressão/economia , Depressão/psicologia , Depressão/virologia , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/economia , Infecções por HIV/psicologia , Infecções por HIV/virologia , HIV-1/patogenicidade , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/ética , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Missouri/epidemiologia , Distanciamento Físico , Quarentena/economia , Quarentena/psicologia , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , Estresse Psicológico/economia , Estresse Psicológico/virologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/economia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/psicologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/virologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
12.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 21(1): 20, 2021 01 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33413109

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: One in five patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD) develop comorbid depression or anxiety. Depression is associated with risk of non-adherence to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and dropout, inadequate risk factor management, poor quality of life (QoL), increased healthcare costs and premature death. In 2020, IHD and depression are expected to be among the top contributors to the disease-burden worldwide. Hence, it is paramount to treat both the underlying somatic disease as well as depression and anxiety. eMindYourHeart will evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a therapist-assisted eHealth intervention targeting depression and anxiety in patients with IHD, which may help fill this gap in clinical care. METHODS: eMindYourHeart is a multi-center, two-armed, unblinded randomised controlled trial that will compare a therapist-assisted eHealth intervention to treatment as usual in 188 CR patients with IHD and comorbid depression or anxiety. The primary outcome of the trial is symptoms of depression, measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months include symptoms of depression and anxiety (HADS), perceived stress, health complaints, QoL (HeartQoL), trial dropout (number of patients dropped out in either arm at 3 months) and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first trial to evaluate both the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a therapist-assisted eHealth intervention in patients with IHD and comorbid psychological distress as part of CR. Integrating screening for and treatment of depression and anxiety into standard CR may decrease dropout and facilitate better risk factor management, as it is presented as "one package" to patients, and they can access the eMindYourHeart program in their own time and at their own convenience. The trial holds a strong potential for improving the quality of care for an increasing population of patients with IHD and comorbid depression, anxiety or both, with likely benefits to patients, families, and society at large due to potential reductions in direct and indirect costs, if proven successful. Trial registration The trial was prospectively registered on https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04172974 on November 21, 2019 with registration number [NCT04172974].


Assuntos
Ansiedade/terapia , Reabilitação Cardíaca , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Depressão/terapia , Intervenção Baseada em Internet , Isquemia Miocárdica/reabilitação , Telemedicina , Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Ansiedade/economia , Ansiedade/psicologia , Reabilitação Cardíaca/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Dinamarca , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/economia , Depressão/psicologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Intervenção Baseada em Internet/economia , Saúde Mental , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Miocárdica/economia , Isquemia Miocárdica/psicologia , Pacientes Desistentes do Tratamento , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Telemedicina/economia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 23(2): 320-326, 2021 01 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32772097

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Contingency management (CM) is efficacious for smoking cessation. To date, the number of cost-effectiveness evaluations of behavioral and pharmacological smoking cessation treatments far outnumbers the ones on CM. This study estimated 1-year efficacy and incremental cost-effectiveness of adding CM in relation to abstinence outcomes for a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)+behavioral activation (BA) treatment. METHODS: The study sample comprised 120 smokers with depression (% females: 70.8%; mean age: 51.67 [SD = 9.59]) enrolled in an 8-week randomized controlled clinical trial. Clinical effectiveness variables were point-prevalence abstinence, continuous abstinence, longest duration of abstinence (LDA), and Beck-Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) scores at 1-year follow-up. Cost-effectiveness analyses were based on resource utilization, unit costs per patient, and incremental cost per additional LDA week at 1 year. RESULTS: There was a significant effect of time by treatment group interaction, which indicated superior effects of CBT+BA+CM across time. Point-prevalence abstinence (53.3% [32/60]) was superior in participants receiving CBT+BA+CM compared with those in CBT+BA (23.3% [14/60]), but both groups were equally likely to present sustained reductions in depression. The average cost per patient was €208.85 (US$236.57) for CBT+BA and €410.64 (US$465.14) for CBT+BA+CM, p < .001. The incremental cost of using CM to enhance 1-year abstinence by one extra LDA week was €18 (US$20.39) (95% confidence interval: 17.75-18.25). CONCLUSIONS: Behavioral treatments addressing both smoking and depression are efficacious for sustaining high quit rates at 1 year. Adding CM to CBT+BA for smoking cessation is highly cost-effective, with an estimated net benefit of €4704 (US$5344.80). IMPLICATIONS: Informing on the cost-effectiveness of CM might expedite the translation of research findings into clinical practice. Findings suggested that CM is feasible and highly cost-effective, confirming that its implementation is worthwhile. At a CM cost per patient of €410.64 (US$465.14), the net benefit equals €4704 (US$5344.80), although even starting from a minimum investment of €20 (US$22.72) was cost-effective. CLINICALTRIALS-GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03163056.


Assuntos
Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Depressão/economia , Fumantes/psicologia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/psicologia , Fumar/economia , Depressão/psicologia , Depressão/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fumar/psicologia , Fumar/terapia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
AIDS Care ; 33(4): 441-447, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31986900

RESUMO

High prevalence of depression among people living with HIV (PLHIV) impedes antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence and viral suppression. We estimate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of strategies to treat depression among PLHIV in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). We developed a microsimulation model of HIV disease and care in Uganda which captured individuals' depression status and the relationship between depression and HIV behaviors. We consider a strategy of screening for depression and providing antidepressant therapy with fluoxetine at ART initiation or re-initiation (if a patient has dropped out). We estimate that over 10 years this strategy would reduce prevalence of depression among PLHIV by 16.0% [95% uncertainty bounds 15.8%, 16.1%] from a baseline prevalence of 28%, increase adherence to ART by 1.0% [1.0%, 1.0%], and decrease rates of loss to followup by 3.7% [3.4%, 4.1%]. This would decrease first-line ART failure rates by 2.5% [2.3%, 2.8%] and increase viral suppression rates by 1.0% [1.0%, 1.0%]. This strategy costs $15/QALY compared to the status quo, and was highly cost-effective over a broad range of sensitivity analyses. We conclude that screening for and treating depression among PLHIV in SSA with fluoxetine would be effective in improving HIV treatment outcomes and would be highly cost-effective.


Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Antidepressivos de Segunda Geração/uso terapêutico , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Fluoxetina/uso terapêutico , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Antidepressivos de Segunda Geração/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Depressão/economia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Feminino , Fluoxetina/economia , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/economia , Uganda/epidemiologia
15.
J Surg Res ; 260: 454-461, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33272593

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Depression has been linked to increased morbidity and mortality in patients after surgery. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of documented depression diagnosis on in-hospital postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing colorectal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients from the National Inpatient Sample (2002-2017) who underwent proctectomies and colectomies were included. The outcomes measured included total hospital charge, length of stay, delirium, wound infection, urinary tract infection (UTI), pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, mortality, paralytic ileus, leak, and discharge trends. Multivariable logistic and Poisson regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of the 4,212,125 patients, depression diagnosis was present in 6.72% of patients who underwent colectomy and 6.54% of patients who underwent proctectomy. Regardless of procedure type, patients with depression had higher total hospital charges and greater rates of delirium, wound infection, UTI, leak, and nonroutine discharge, with no difference in length of stay. On adjusted analysis, patients with a depression diagnosis who underwent colectomies had increased risk of delirium (odds ratio (OR) 2.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.93-2.32), wound infection (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.12), UTI (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.10-1.20), paralytic ileus (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.09), and leak (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.30-1.43). Patients who underwent proctectomy showed similar results, with the addition of significantly increased total hospital charges among the depression group. Depression diagnosis was independently associated with lower risk of in-hospital mortality (colectomy OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.53-0.62; proctectomy OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a diagnosis of depression suffer worse in-hospital outcomes but experience lower risk of in-hospital mortality after undergoing colorectal surgery. Further studies are needed to validate and fully understand the driving factors behind this.


Assuntos
Colectomia , Depressão/complicações , Preços Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Protectomia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colectomia/economia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Depressão/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Período Pré-Operatório , Protectomia/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos
16.
Value Health ; 23(12): 1662-1670, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33248522

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for depression. Different CBT delivery formats (face-to-face [F2F], multimedia, and hybrid) and intensities have been used to expand access to the treatment. The aim of this study is to estimate the long-term cost-effectiveness of different CBT delivery modes. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different CBT delivery modes and variations in intensity in comparison with treatment as usual (TAU). The model covered an average treatment period of 4 months with a 5-year follow-up period. The model was populated using a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and various sources from the literature. RESULTS: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of treatments compared with the next best option after excluding all the dominated and extended dominated options are: £209/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for 6 (sessions) × 30 (minutes) F2F-CBT versus TAU; £4 453/QALY for 8 × 30 F2F versus 6 × 30 F2F; £12 216/QALY for 8 × 60 F2F versus 8 × 30 F2F; and £43 072/QALY for 16 × 60 F2F versus 8 × 60 F2F. The treatment with the highest net monetary benefit for thresholds of £20 000 to £30 000/QALY was 8 × 30 F2F-CBT. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis illustrated 6 × 30 F2F-CBT had the highest probability (32.8%) of being cost-effective at £20 000/QALY; 16 × 60 F2F-CBT had the highest probability (31.0%) at £30 000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: All CBT delivery modes on top of TAU were found to be more cost-effective than TAU alone. Four F2F-CBT options (6 × 30, 8 × 30, 8 × 60, 16 × 60) are on the cost-effectiveness frontier. F2F-CBT with intensities of 6 × 30 and 16 × 60 had the highest probabilities of being cost-effective. The results, however, should be interpreted with caution owing to the high level of uncertainty.


Assuntos
Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/economia , Depressão/terapia , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/métodos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Depressão/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Econômicos
17.
BMC Public Health ; 20(1): 1514, 2020 Oct 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33023562

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Young women with breast cancer tend to report lower quality of life and higher levels of stress than older women with breast cancer, and this may have implications for other psychosocial factors including finances. We sought to determine if stress, anxiety, and depression at diagnosis were associated with changes in household income over 12-months in young women with breast cancer in the United States. METHODS: This study was a prospective, longitudinal cohort study comprised of women enrolled in the Young and Strong trial. Of the 467 women aged 18-45 newly diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer enrolled in the Young and Strong trial from 2012 to 2013, 356 (76%) answered income questions. Change in household income from baseline to 12 months was assessed and women were categorized as having lost, gained, maintained the same household income <$100,000, or maintained household income ≥$100,000. Patient-reported stress, anxiety, and depression were assessed close to diagnosis at trial enrollment. Adjusted multinomial logistic regression models were used to compare women who lost, gained, or maintained household income ≥$100,000 to women who maintained the same household income <$100,000. RESULTS: Although most women maintained household income ≥$100,000 (37.1%) or the same household income <$100,000 (32.3%), 15.4% lost household income and 15.2% gained household income. Stress, anxiety, and depression were not associated with gaining or losing household income compared to women maintaining household incomes <$100,000. Women with household incomes <$50,000 had a higher risk of losing household income compared to women with household incomes ≥$50,000. Women who maintained household incomes ≥$100,000 were less likely to report financial or insurance problems. Among women who lost household income, 56% reported financial problems and 20% reported insurance problems at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline stress, anxiety, and depression were not associated with household income changes for young women with breast cancer. However, lower baseline household income was associated with losing household income. Some young survivors encounter financial and insurance problems in the first year after diagnosis, and further support for these women should be considered. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov , NCT01647607 ; date registered: July 23, 2012.


Assuntos
Ansiedade/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/psicologia , Sobreviventes de Câncer/psicologia , Depressão/economia , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Estresse Psicológico/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Ansiedade/etiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Depressão/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico/etiologia , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
18.
Infant Behav Dev ; 61: 101498, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33091713

RESUMO

The goals of the present study were to examine the extent to which (a) maternal depressive symptoms (prenatal vs. postnatal depressive symptoms) undermine maternal sensitivity toward both infant distress and non-distress; (b) such effects are stronger in the context of socioeconomic risk. SES risk and depressive symptoms interacted such that depressive symptoms, both pre and postnatal, only predicted lower sensitivity among mothers at heightened SES risk. The effects were comparable for sensitivity to distress and non-distress and did not vary by maternal race.


Assuntos
Depressão/psicologia , Comportamento do Lactente/psicologia , Mães/psicologia , Angústia Psicológica , Grupos Raciais/psicologia , Classe Social , Adolescente , Adulto , Depressão/economia , Depressão/etnologia , Depressão Pós-Parto/economia , Depressão Pós-Parto/etnologia , Depressão Pós-Parto/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Comportamento do Lactente/fisiologia , Masculino , Gravidez , Grupos Raciais/etnologia , Adulto Jovem
20.
J Prev Med Public Health ; 53(5): 332-341, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33070505

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the Basic Old-Age Pension (BOP), which is a noncontributory pension, and depression in BOP beneficiaries in Korea. METHODS: We used the second and third waves (2007-2008) of the Korea Welfare Panel Study to identify the effect of the BOP on mental health in the year of its introduction. The Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, applied in a Korean context, was used to evaluate mental health. To analyze the effect of the BOP, a difference-in-difference approach was used in analyses of all subjects and subgroups. RESULTS: For this study population of 760 adults, the BOP did not have a statistically significant relationship with depression in its beneficiaries. After controlling for type of household, the BOP was still not associated with lower reporting of depression, either in single-beneficiary or double-beneficiary households, in the year of the benefit. CONCLUSIONS: The BOP policy had no significant relationship with the level of depression among recipients. However, this should not be interpreted as implying that income subsidy programs for older adults, such as the BOP, do not affect mental health, considering the importance of economic hardship in this population and the program's socioeconomic effects.


Assuntos
Depressão/psicologia , Pensões/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Correlação de Dados , Depressão/economia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Aposentadoria/economia , Aposentadoria/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA