Detection and Analysis of Blood Dexmedetomidine in Drug-Facilitated Cases.

OBJECTIVES: To establish a simple and rapid qualitative and quantitative detection method of dexmedetomidine in blood. METHODS: Blood was separated on the Allure PFP Propyl liquid chromatography column with isocratic elution after it was precipitated by acetonitrile and filtered. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of dexmedetomidine was performed using positive ion scan mode and multi-reaction monitoring mode. RESULTS: The limit of detection of dexmedetomidine in blood was 0.2 ng/mL and the limit of quantification was 0.5 ng/mL. The linearity of the method was good in the range of 0.5-1 000 ng/mL, and the correlation coefficient was greater than 0.99. The accuracy of the method was 90.34%-112.67% and the extraction recovery was 50.05%-91.08%, with no significant matrix effect. CONCLUSIONS: This method is simple, selective and suitable for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of dexmedetomidine in blood, which can provide a reference for drug-facilitated cases involving dexmedetomidine.

Effects of dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic, oxygenation, microcirculation, and inflammatory markers in a porcine model of sepsis

Purpose: To determine whether dexmedetomidine aggravates hemodynamic, metabolic variables, inflammatory markers, and microcirculation in experimental septic shock. Methods: Twenty-four pigs randomized into: Sham group (n = 8), received saline; Shock group (n = 8), received an intravenous infusion of Escherichia coli O55 (3 × 109 cells/mL, 0.75 mL/kg, 1 hour); Dex-Shock group (n = 8), received bacteria and intravenous dexmedetomidine (bolus 0.5 mcg/kg followed by 0.7 mcg/kg/h). Fluid therapy and/ornorepinephrine were administered to maintain a mean arterial pressure > 65 mmHg. Hemodynamic, metabolic, oxygenation, inflammatory markers, and microcirculation were assessed at baseline, at the end of bacterial infusion, and after 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes. Results: Compared to Shock group, Dex-Shock group presented a significantly increased oxygen extraction ratio at T180 (23.1 ± 9.7 vs. 32.5 ± 9.2%, P = 0.0220), decreased central venous pressure at T120 (11.6 ± 1 vs. 9.61 ± 1.2 mmHg, P = 0.0214), mixed-venous oxygen saturation at T180 (72.9 ± 9.6 vs. 63.5 ± 9.2%, P = 0.026), and increased plasma lactate (3.7 ± 0.5 vs. 5.5 ± 1 mmol/L, P = 0.003). Despite the Dex-Shock group having a better sublingual vessel density at T240 (12.5 ± 0.4 vs. 14.4 ± 0.3 mL/m2; P = 0.0003), sublingual blood flow was not different from that in the Shock group (2.4 ± 0.2 vs. 2.4 ± 0.1 mL/kg, P = 0.4418). Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine did not worsen the hemodynamic, metabolic, inflammatory, or sublingual blood flow disorders resulting from septic shock. Despite inducing a better sublingual vessel density, dexmedetomidine initially and transitorily increased the mismatch between oxygen supply and demand.

Determination of dexmedetomidine using high performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometric (HPLC-MS/MS) assay combined with microdialysis technique: Application to a pharmacokinetic study.

Dexmedetomidine, as a safe sedative, mainly exerts on the central nervous system particularly in the locus coeruleus producing arousable sedation with potential analgesic and anxiolytic effects. The quantification and pharmacokinetic investigation of dexmedetomidine in the central nervous system have been described rarely. In order to estimate the unbound dexmedetomidine concentrations in brain extracellular fluid and blood simultaneously, we employed microdialysis technique as a sampling method and primarily established a rapid, sensitive and selective high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry method (HPLC-MS/MS). Dexmedetomidine and the internal standard (dexmedetomidine-d4) were extracted in liquid-liquid extraction procedure with ethyl acetate from 10 µL of alkalinized microdialysate sample. After evaporation under nitrogen at room temperature, the analytes were reconstituted in acetonitrile and transferred to be detected. HPLC was performed on an Agilent Poroshell 120 Hilic column (4.6 × 100 mm, 2.7 µm) with isocratic elution at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min by 0.1% formic acid/acetonitrile (60:40, v/v). The detection was performed on a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer in the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode using the respective [M+H]+ ions m/z 201.2 to m/z 95.1 for DEX and m/z 205.2 to m/z 99.1 for IS (DEX-d4). The concentration-response relationship was of good linearity over a concentration range of 1.00-1000.00 ng/mL with the correlation coefficient above 0.999. The lower limit of quantification was 1.00 ng/mL with a relative standard deviation of less than 20%. The intra- and inter-day accuracy were within ±5.00% and precision was <7.23%. The recoveries of dexmedetomidine in microdialysates were 76.61-93.38%. The validated HPLC-MS/MS method has been successfully applied to study the pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine in rats after a caudal vein administration.

Quality by design-assisted development of a capillary electrophoresis method for the chiral purity determination of dexmedetomidine.

Dexmedetomidine is a selective α2 -adrenergic agonist used for patient sedation, while its enantiomer levomedetomidine has no sedative effects. As CE has been shown to be a powerful technique for enantiomer analysis, the aim of the study was the quality by design-based development of a CE-based limit test for the enantiomeric impurity levomedetomidine. The analytical target profile was defined that the method should be able to determine levomedetomidine with acceptable precision and accuracy at the 0.1% level. From initial scouting experiments, sulfated ß-cyclodextrin was selected as chiral selector. The critical process parameters were identified in a fractional factorial resolution V+ design, while a central composite face centered design and Monte Carlo simulations were used for defining the design space of the method. The selected working conditions were a 21.3/31.5 cm, 50 µm id fused-silica capillary, a 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, containing 40 mg/mL sulfated ß-cyclodextrin, a capillary temperature of 17°C and an applied voltage of 10 kV. Validation according to the ICH guideline Q2(R1) demonstrated repeatability and intermediate precision of content and migration time between 9.3 and 4.2% with accuracy in the range of 92.0 and 98.9%.

Avaliação da dexmedetomidina e do tramadol, associados ao midazolam, em gatas anestesiadas com isoflurano e submetidas à ovário-histerectomia / Evaluation of dexmedetomidine and tramadol, associated with midazolam, in cats anesthetized with isoflurane, undergoing ovariohysterectomy

Objetivou-se comparar as alterações cardiorrespiratórias e a analgesia pós-operatória promovidas pela dexmedetomidina e pelo tramadol, quando associados ao midazolam, em felinas. Para tal, foram selecionadas 18 gatas hígidas, divididas em dois grupos randomizados: GDM, tratadas com dexmedetomidina (10µg/kg) e GTM, tratadas com tramadol (2mg/kg), ambos associados a midazolam (0,2mg/kg,) IM. Após 15 minutos, procedeu-se à indução anestésica com propofol (1,46±0,79mL), mantendo-se a anestesia com isoflurano. As felinas foram submetidas à ovário-histerectomia, registrando-se as variáveis cardiorrespiratórias 15 minutos após a MPA (M0), 15 minutos após a indução (M15) e sequencialmente a cada cinco minutos, até o término do procedimento cirúrgico (M20, M25, M30, M35 e M40). A avaliação da dor iniciou-se 30 minutos após o término do procedimento cirúrgico (MP30) e sequencialmente em intervalos de 30 minutos (MP60, MP90, MP120). A partir do MP120, as avaliações foram registradas a cada hora (MP180, MP240 e MP360). A associação dexmedetomidina-midazolam infere diminuição inicial de frequência cardíaca (FC) sem significado clínico e está relacionada à sedação mais pronunciada, à analgesia menor e menos duradoura e a episódios de êmese, quando comparada à associação tramadol-midazolam. Ambos os protocolos denotaram estabilidade cardiorrespiratória e podem ser considerados seguros em felinas submetidas à ovário-histectomia.(AU)

The aim of this study was to compare cardiorespiratory changes and post-operative analgesia provided by dexmedetomidine or tramadol, associated with midazolam, in female cats. For that purpose, 18 healthy cats were assigned to two randomized groups: GDM, which received dexmedetomidine (10 µg/kg) and GTM, which received tramadol (2 mg/kg), both associated with midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) IM. After 15 minutes, anesthesia was induced with propofol (1.46±0.79 mL) and maintained with isofluorane. Ovariohysterectomy was performed and cardiorespiratory variables were registered 15 minutes after pre-anesthetic medication (M0), 15 minutes after anesthetic induction (M15), and every five minutes until the end of the surgical procedure (M20, M25, M30, M35 e M40). Pain evaluation started 30 minutes after the surgery (MP30) and sequentially at thirty-minute intervals (MP60, MP90, MP120). After MP120, each evaluation was registered at every hour (MP180, MP240 e MP360). Dexmedetomidine-midazolam association results in decreases on initial heart rate (HR) without clinical relevance and it is related to pronounced sedation, poor and less durable antinociception and vomiting events, when compared to tramadol-midazolam association. Both protocols indicate cardiorespiratoy stability and safety in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy.(AU)

Investigation of Key Circuit Constituents Affecting Drug Sequestration During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Treatment.

We quantified the influence of the elements of the extracorporeal oxygenation (ECMO) circuit on drug sequestration by focusing on the interactions between materials and drugs. Tubing of three different brands (Tygon/Maquet/Terumo) and oxygenators of two different brands (Maquet/Terumo) were used. Drugs included dexmedetomidine, meropenem, and heparin, which were dissolved in deionized water. Tubing was cut into approximately 7 cm sections and allowed drug solutions enclosed inside by clamping both ends. The oxygenator housing, gas membrane, and heat exchanger were dissected into approximately 1 g pieces and submerged into drug solutions. The experimental samples were then immersed in a water bath at 37°C for 1, 6, 12, and 24 h. After 24 h, the dexmedetomidine concentration was significantly reduced in all three types of tubing (<30.1%), the oxygenator heat exchanger from Maquet Inc. (41.8%), and the gas exchanger from Terumo Inc. (8.6%), while no significant losses were found for meropenem and heparin compared with the control group. The heparin concentration within the Maquet gas exchanger, on the contrary, increased significantly compared with the control group at 1 and 12 h (p < 0.05). Our in vitro study reveals that material selection is a vital part of ECMO development.

Detection of dexmedetomidine in human breast milk using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: Application to a study of drug safety in breastfeeding after Cesarean section.

Several analytical methods for dexmedetomidine (DEX) in human plasma have been published, but quantification of DEX in human breast milk has not been described. In this article, we describe a high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method suitable for quantification of DEX in human breast milk. DEX and an internal standard were extracted in a single liquid-liquid extraction step with diethyl ether from 200µL of human breast milk. HPLC was performed on a TSK-gel ODS-100V column with isocratic elution at a flow rate of 0.3mL/min using a mobile phase of 5mM ammonium formate:0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (60:40, v/v). Detection was performed using an API4000 mass spectrometer with positive electrospray ionization. The method was validated in the concentration range of 10pg/mL (lower limit of quantification) to 2000pg/mL. The intra- and inter-day accuracy were within ±5.8% and precision was <6.31% based on the coefficient of variation. The recoveries of DEX in human breast milk were 82.4-87.9%. Recovery and matrix effects were consistent and reproducible for human breast milk. The method is robust and was successfully used in a study of drug safety in breastfeeding in patients after administration of DEX.

High performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric assay of dexmedetomidine in plasma, urine and amniotic fluid samples for pregnant ewe model.

Dexmedetomidine (DEX; Precedex(®)), approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1999 as a sedative for use in the intensive care unit, is a potent and highly selective α2-adrenoceptor agonist with significant sedative, analgesic and anxiolytic effects. However, the research of DEX use during pregnancy is limited and the impact of DEX on the fetal development is unclear. This article describes a high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) assay suitable for various biomatrices of plasma, urine and amniotic fluid, as a prerequisite for pharmacokinetic characterization of DEX in the pregnant ewe model. DEX and testosterone (internal standard; IS) were extracted from 200µL of plasma, urine or amniotic fluid with ethyl acetate. The HPLC resolution was achieved on an Agilent ZORBAX SB-CN column with a gradient elution at a flow rate of 0.5mL/min using a mobile phase of 5-100% of acetonitrile with 0.5% formic acid (mobile phase B) in water (mobile phase A). The detection was performed by a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer with positive electrospray ionization. The precursor/product transitions (m/z) in the positive ion mode [M+H](+) were m/z 201.5→95.4 for DEX and m/z 289.2→109.1 for IS. The method was validated in the concentration range of 25 (lower limit of quantification; LLOQ)-5000pg/mL for both maternal and fetal plasma, and of 50 (LLOQ)-5000pg/mL for urine and amniotic fluid, respectively. The intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy were within ±9%. The overall recoveries of DEX were 82.9-87.2%, 85.7-88.4%, 86.2-89.7% and 83.7-88.1% for maternal plasma, urine, fetal plasma and amniotic fluid, respectively. The percentage matrix factors in different biomatrices were less than 120%. Stability studies demonstrated that DEX was stable after three freeze/thaw cycles, in the autosampler tray at 20°C for 24h and during the 3h sample preparation at room temperature. The validated HPLC-MS/MS method has been successfully employed for pharmacokinetic evaluation of DEX in pregnant ewes and fetuses.

Stability of dexmedetomidine 4 µg/mL in polypropylene syringes.

PURPOSE: The results of a study to determine the long-term (up to 14 days) stability of diluted dexmedetomidine kept in polypropylene syringes under typical pharmacy storage conditions are presented. METHODS: Four samples of dexmedetomidine injection diluted to 4 µg/mL in 0.9% sodium chloride were prepared and divided into 25-mL portions for storage in syringes at ambient room temperature (20-25 °C) with light exposure or under refrigeration (5 °C) in darkness. At 24 and 48 hours, the percentage of the initial dexmedetomidine concentration remaining in all samples was assessed via high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection; further stability testing of the refrigerated samples was performed on days 7 and 14. At each time point, the test samples were visually inspected for color, clarity, and signs of formation of particulate matter. RESULTS: As determined by chromatographic analyses, the samples of diluted dexmedetomidine stored in syringes at room temperature exhibited a loss of drug concentration of <10% over 48 hours; the refrigerated samples exhibited a loss of drug concentration of <5% over 14 days. All of the syringe-stored samples remained clear and colorless on visual inspection for the duration of the study. CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine diluted to 4 µg/mL in 0.9% sodium chloride injection was stable for at least 48 hours at 20-25 °C and 14 days at 5 °C when stored in polypropylene syringes.

Population pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine in infants after open heart surgery.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha(2)-agonist with hypnotic, analgesic, and anxiolytic properties. In adults, it provides sedation while preserving respiratory function facilitating extubation. Only limited pharmacokinetic data are available for pediatric patients. The primary aim of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine in infants after open heart surgery. METHODS: We evaluated 36 infants, aged 1 to 24 months, after open heart surgery. Cohorts of 12 infants requiring mechanical ventilation after open heart surgery were enrolled sequentially to 1 of the 3 initial loading dose-continuous IV infusion (CIVI) regimens: 0.35-0.25, 0.7-0.5, or 1-0.75 microg/kg-microg/kg/h. The initial loading dose was administered over 10 minutes immediately postoperatively followed by a CIVI of up to 24 hours. Plasma dexmedetomidine concentrations were determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay. A population nonlinear mixed effects modeling approach was used to characterize dexmedetomidine pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic parameters of dexmedetomidine were estimated using a 2-compartment disposition model with weight on drug clearance, intercompartmental clearance, central and peripheral volume of distributions, total bypass time as a covariate on clearance and central volume of distribution, and age and ventricular physiology as covariates on clearance. Infants demonstrated a clearance of 28.1 mL/min/kg(0.75), intercompartmental clearance of 93.4 mL/min/kg(0.75), central volume of distribution of 1.2 L/kg, and peripheral volume of distribution of 1.5 L/kg. CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine clearance increased with weight, age, and single-ventricle physiology, whereas total bypass time was associated with a trend toward decreasing clearance, and central volume of distribution increased as a function of total bypass time. The dependence of clearance on body weight supports current practice of weight-based dexmedetomidine dosing, whereas the clinical impact of the remaining covariate effects requires further investigation. Initial loading doses in the range of 0.35 to 1 microg/kg over 10 minutes and CIVI of 0.25 to 0.75 microg/kg/h were well tolerated in this infant population.

Induced hypotension in orthognathic surgery: a comparative study of 2 pharmacological protocols.

PURPOSE: The objective of this comparative study was to report on the use of 2 different pharmaceutical protocols involving 2 different anesthetic techniques (IV and balanced) to induce hypotension in patients submitted to orthognathic surgery by assessing the patients' intra- and postoperative physiologic response and hemodynamic stability. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty ASA I patients, between 17 and 44 years of age who had dental and skeletal deformities were subdivided into 2 groups: group I (clonidine associated to remifentanil), and group II (dexmedetomidine associated to isoflurane), in addition, other drugs were common to both groups. The following responses were assessed: arterial blood pressure, heart rate, temperature during intra- and postoperative periods, incidence of nausea and vomiting, postoperative pain, awakening time, extubation time, and postanesthetic recovery time. RESULTS: The results of the study using Repeated Measures Test statistical analysis showed that there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in respect to physiologic responses or surgery time. CONCLUSION: Both protocols tried in this study proved to be effective and safe, and they seem to be interesting alternatives in longer orthognathic surgeries with the expectation of an important blood loss. The choice for either protocol should be based on the inherent risks involved in their use and their cost-benefit ratio.