Apparent total tract macronutrient digestibility of mildly cooked human-grade vegan dog foods and their effects on the blood metabolites and fecal characteristics, microbiota, and metabolites of adult dogs.

Vegan, mildly cooked, and human-grade dog foods are becoming more popular, as beliefs and views of pet owners change. To our knowledge, however, dog studies have not examined the digestibility of commercial vegan diets. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of mildly cooked human-grade vegan dog foods and their effects on blood metabolites and fecal microbiota, characteristics, and metabolites of adult dogs consuming them. Three commercial dog foods were tested. Two were mildly cooked human-grade vegan dog diets, while the third was a chicken-based extruded dog diet. Twelve healthy adult female beagles (7.81 ± 0.65 kg; 7.73 ± 1.65 yr) were used in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin Square design. The study consisted of three experimental periods, with each composed of a 7 d diet adaptation phase, 15 d of consuming 100% of the diet, a 5 d phase for fecal collection for ATTD measurement, and 1 d for blood collection for serum chemistry and hematology. During the fecal collection period, a fresh sample was collected for fecal scoring and dry matter, pH, metabolite, and microbiota measurements. All data were analyzed using the Mixed Models procedure of SAS (version 9.4). All three diets were shown to be highly digestible, with all macronutrients having digestibility values above 80%. The vegan diets had higher (P < 0.001) ATTD of fat, but lower (P < 0.05) ATTD of organic matter than the extruded diet. Dogs consuming the vegan diets had lower circulating cholesterol (P < 0.001), triglyceride (P < 0.001), and platelet (P < 0.009) concentrations and lower (P < 0.010) blood neutrophil percentages than dogs consuming the extruded diet. Dogs consuming vegan diets had lower (P < 0.001) fecal dry matter percentages, lower (P < 0.001) fecal phenol and indole concentrations, and higher (P = 0.05) fecal short-chain fatty acid concentrations than those consuming the extruded diet. Fecal bacterial alpha and beta diversities were not different (P > 0.05) among diets, but dogs consuming vegan diets had altered (P < 0.05) relative abundances of nearly 20 bacterial genera when compared with those consuming the extruded diet. In conclusion, the mildly cooked human-grade vegan dog foods tested in this study performed well, resulting in desirable fecal characteristics, ATTD, and serum chemistries. The vegan diets tested also led to positive changes to serum lipids and fecal metabolites, and interesting changes to the fecal microbial community.

Vegan, mildly cooked, and human-grade dog foods are increasing in popularity, but few studies have been performed to examine their performance. Our objective was to determine the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of mildly cooked human-grade vegan dog foods and their effects on blood metabolites and fecal microbiota, characteristics, and metabolites of dogs. Two mildly cooked human-grade vegan dog diets and a chicken-based extruded dog diet were tested using 12 healthy adult dogs in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin Square design. All diets were highly digestible, with all macronutrients having digestibility values >80%. Vegan diets had higher ATTD of fat, but lower ATTD of organic matter than the extruded diet. Dogs consuming vegan diets had lower circulating cholesterol, triglycerides, platelets, and neutrophils than dogs consuming the extruded diet. Dogs consuming vegan diets had lower fecal dry matter percentages and phenol and indole concentrations, and higher fecal short-chain fatty acid concentrations than those consuming the extruded diet. Finally, ~20 bacterial genera were altered between dogs consuming vegan and extruded diets. In conclusion, the mildly cooked human-grade vegan dog foods tested performed well, resulting in desirable fecal characteristics, high ATTD, adequate serum chemistries, positive changes to serum lipids and fecal metabolites, and interesting changes to fecal microbiota.

Do we have a moral obligation to be vegan?

Leanne Dalton argues that to truly fulfil the declaration to 'above all ensure the health and welfare of animals', those working in the vet profession should adopt veganism - which has been defined as a philosophy and way of living that rejects exploitation and cruelty to animals.

Vegan versus meat-based dog food: Guardian-reported indicators of health.

Alternative pet foods may offer benefits concerning environmental sustainability and the welfare of animals processed into pet foods. However, some worry these may compromise the welfare of pets. We asked 2,639 dog guardians about one dog living with them, for at least one year. Among 2,596 involved in pet diet decision-making, pet health was a key factor when choosing diets. 2,536 provided information relating to a single dog, fed a conventional meat (1,370 = 54%), raw meat (830 = 33%) or vegan (336 = 13%) diet for at least one year. We examined seven general indicators of ill health: unusual numbers of veterinary visits, medication use, progression onto a therapeutic diet after initial maintenance on a vegan or meat-based diet, guardian opinion and predicted veterinary opinion of health status, percentage of unwell dogs and number of health disorders per unwell dog. Dogs fed conventional diets appeared to fare worse than those fed either of the other two diets. Dogs fed raw meat appeared to fare marginally better than those fed vegan diets. However, there were statistically significant differences in average ages. Dogs fed raw meat were younger, which has been demonstrated to be associated with improved health outcomes. Additionally, non-health related factors may have improved apparent outcomes for dogs fed raw meat, for three of seven general health indicators. We also considered the prevalence of 22 specific health disorders, based on predicted veterinary assessments. Percentages of dogs in each dietary group considered to have suffered from health disorders were 49% (conventional meat), 43% (raw meat) and 36% (vegan). Significant evidence indicates that raw meat diets are often associated with dietary hazards, including nutritional deficiencies and imbalances, and pathogens. Accordingly, the pooled evidence to date indicates that the healthiest and least hazardous dietary choices for dogs, are nutritionally sound vegan diets.

'A sustainable future isn't vegan, it's flexitarian'.

Jude Capper, a livestock sustainability consultant, argues that adopting a vegan diet isn't a sustainably viable option for the future, and that it is better to encourage UK consumers to buy locally produced goods and follow a flexitarian diet.

[Assessment of vegan complete diets for dogs and cats available in Germany]. / Beurteilung in Deutschland erhältlicher veganer Alleinfuttermittel für Hunde und Katzen.

OBJECTIVE: Nutritional assessment of commercial vegan complete diets for adult cats and dogs and the evaluation of the products' legal labelling. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four complete vegan diets for adult cats and dogs available on the German market were analyzed concerning their nutrient and mineral content. The required amount of food was determined by calculation and compared to the manufacturers' feeding recommendation. Data labelling was assessed for its accordance with EC regulation 767/2009. The supply of taurine and vitamins was evaluated for its adequacy by use of the nutritional additive data on the product label. RESULTS: In most cases, the labelled data complied with the regulatory framework. The manufacturers' feeding recommendation differed significantly from the calculated feed quantity in 2 out of 4 feeds. The recommendations resulted in a coverage of 64 to 121 % of the total energy requirement, more frequently leading to an underestimation of the required feed amount. The supply of minerals exceeded the recommended allowance by 5.2- to 8.2-fold in the adult dog and by 9.0- and 11.4-fold in the adult cat. In 1 out of 4 diets, the European Pet Food Industry Federation guidelines were undercut for crude protein, crude fat and phosphorus. Zinc and copper contents were in excess and/or insufficient. A shortfall in National Research Council (NRC) recommendations was present for zinc content in one diet. Most products met the recommended supply of essential amino acids; 2 products only met the minimum requirements for methionine and cystine but not the recommended provision. The added taurine met the recommended intake in one commercial diet for cats. Requirements for vitamin intake were fulfilled by the nutritional additives in 3 products. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: None of the products fulfilled the energy and nutrient requirements for a complete diet for adult dogs and cats without limitations. Therefore, deficiencies in the supply of individual nutrients cannot be ruled out under long-term feeding of the examined vegan diets.

Vegan versus meat-based pet foods: Owner-reported palatability behaviours and implications for canine and feline welfare.

Consumer suspicion of conventional pet foods, along with perceived health benefits of alternative diets, are fuelling development of the latter. These include raw meat diets, in vitro meat products, and diets based on novel protein sources such as terrestrial and marine plants, insects, yeast and fungi. However, some claim vegan diets may be less palatable, or may compromise animal welfare. We surveyed 4,060 dog or cat guardians to determine the importance to them of pet food palatability, and the degree to which their animals displayed specific behavioural indicators of palatability at meal times. Guardians were asked to choose one dog or cat that had been within their household for at least one year, and not on a prescription or therapeutic diet. Of 3,976 respondents who played some role in pet diet decision-making, palatability was the third most important among 12 factors cited as important when choosing pet diets. For 1,585 respondents feeding conventional or raw meat diets, who stated they would realistically consider alternative diets, palatability was the fourth most important among 14 desired attributes. For the 2,308 dogs included, reported observations of 10 behavioural indicators of palatability at meal times reliably indicated significant effects of increased reports of appetitive behaviour by dogs on a raw meat diet, as opposed to a conventional diet. There was no consistent evidence of a difference between vegan diets and either the conventional or raw meat diets. For the 1,135 cats included, reported observations of 15 behavioural indicators indicated that diet made little difference to food-oriented behaviour. Based on these owner-reported behaviours, our results indicate that vegan pet foods are generally at least as palatable to dogs and cats as conventional meat or raw meat diets, and do not compromise their welfare, when other welfare determinants, such as nutritional requirements, are adequately provided.

Relationship between a plant-based 'vegan' pet food and clinical manifestation of multiple nutrient deficiencies in two cats.

A topical subject in human nutrition is the steadily growing number of people choosing to limit or completely avoid all animal-derived food products either for moral dilemma, health concerns or both. To meet people's will of applying their dietary choices to their domestic animals, the pet food industry answered by launching on the market some plant-based diets. This leads to concerns about whether these diets are adequately formulated to satisfy the target species nutritional requirements, especially for cats which are still considered strict carnivores. This case report follows a 2-year-old male neutered Main Coon and a 1-year-old female spayed Domestic Shorthair cat, presented to the nutrition service of the University of Toulouse, France. Reason for consultation was lethargy with in anamnesis a recent dietary transition to a plant-based pet food. Dysorexia, lethargy and muscle waste were present at first consultation. Progressive weight loss developed during follow-ups. A macrocytic, non-regenerative anaemia with serum folates below reference were the main clinical features. Analysis of pet food showed multiple nutrients below minimum recommendation at the average daily intake of both cats. Folic acid supplementation improved dysorexia, and subsequent reintroduction of animal-derived ingredients in the diet restored appetite, weight and a normal mentation in both cases.

Plant-based (vegan) diets for pets: A survey of pet owner attitudes and feeding practices.

People who avoid eating animals tend to share their homes with animal companions, and moral dilemma may arise when they are faced with feeding animal products to their omnivorous dogs and carnivorous cats. One option to alleviate this conflict is to feed pets a diet devoid of animal ingredients-a 'plant-based' or 'vegan' diet. The number of pet owners who avoid animal products, either in their own or in their pets' diet, is not currently known. The objective of this study was to estimate the number of meat-avoiding pet owners, identify concerns regarding conventional animal- and plant-based pet food, and estimate the number of pets fed a plant-based diet. A questionnaire was disseminated online to English-speaking pet owners (n = 3,673) to collect data regarding pet owner demographics, diet, pet type, pet diet, and concerns regarding pet foods. Results found that pet owners were more likely to be vegetarian (6.2%; 229/3,673) or vegan (5.8%; 212/3,673) than previously reported for members of the general population. With the exception of one dog owned by a vegetarian, vegans were the only pet owners who fed plant-based diets to their pets (1.6%; 59/3,673). Of the pet owners who did not currently feed plant-based diets but expressed interest in doing so, a large proportion (45%; 269/599) desired more information demonstrating the nutritional adequacy of plant-based diets. Amongst all pet owners, the concern most commonly reported regarding meat-based pet foods was for the welfare of farm animals (39%; 1,275/3,231). The most common concern regarding strictly plant-based pet foods was regarding the nutritional completeness of the diet (74%; 2,439/3,318). Amongst vegans, factors which predicted the feeding of plant-based diets to their pets were concern regarding the cost of plant-based diets, a lack of concern regarding plant-based diets being unnatural, and reporting no concern at all regarding plant-based diets for pets. Given these findings, further research is warranted to investigate plant-based nutrition for domestic dogs and cats.