OPTN/SRTR 2020 Annual Data Report: DOD.

SRTR uses data collected by OPTN to calculate metrics such as donation rate, organ yield, and rate of organs recovered for transplant but not transplanted. In 2020, there were 12,588 deceased donors, an increase from 11,870 in 2019; this number has been increasing since 2010. The number of deceased donor transplants increased to 33,303 in 2020, from 32,313 in 2019; this number has been increasing since 2012. The increase may be due in part to the rising number of deaths of young people amid the ongoing opioid epidemic. The number of organs transplanted included 18,410 kidneys, 962 pancreata, 8350 livers, 91 intestines, 3722 hearts, and 2463 lungs. Compared with 2019, transplants of all organs except pancreata and lung transplants increased in 2020, which is remarkable despite the pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV2 virus. In 2020, 4870 kidneys, 294 pancreata, 861 livers, 3 intestines, 39 hearts, and 115 lungs were discarded. The number of discards was similar to that of the previous year. In 2019, 4,324 kidneys, 346 pancreata, 867 livers, 5 intestines, 31 hearts, and 148 lungs were discarded. These numbers suggest an opportunity to increase numbers of transplants by reducing discards. Despite the pandemic, there was no dramatic increase in number of discards and an increase in total number of donors and transplants.

Nota Técnica N. 2/2022 - SES/GERTRAN/CCM - 19813 - ações relacionadas ao transplante renal em Goiás / Technical Note N. 2/2022 - SES/GERTRAN/CCM-19813 - actions related to kidney transplantation in Goiás

A Portaria MS n.º 78, de 9 de março de 1.999, credenciou a Central Estadual de Transplantes de Goiás - CET/GO e desde então, os transplantes no Estado tem desenvolvido de forma íntegra e abrangente, inclusive no que tange outras instituições, as quais possam participar de forma direta ou indiretamente das ações relacionadas aos transplantes, no Estado. Diante disso, a presente Nota Técnica n.º 2/2022 visa orientar, organizar e publicizar o fluxo das ações relacionadas aos transplantes de rins em Goiás, de modo a atender as legislações vigentes, bem como a necessidade social e médica, em consonância com os princípios do SUS, que são norteadores desse processo

Ordinance MS n.º 78, of March 9, 1999, accredited the Goiás State Transplant Center - CET/GO and since then, transplants in the State have developed in an integral and comprehensive way, including with regard to other institutions, which can participate directly or indirectly in actions related to transplants in the State. Therefore, this Technical Note No. 2/2022 - aims to guide, organize and publicize the flow of actions related to kidney transplants in Goiás, in order to comply with current legislation, as well as the social need and medical, in line with the principles of the SUS, which guide this process

A Statistical Prediction Model for Survival After Kidney Transplantation from Deceased Donors.

BACKGROUND In an environment of limited kidney donation resources, patient recovery and survival after kidney transplantation (KT) are highly important. We used pre-operative data of kidney recipients to build a statistical model for predicting survivability after kidney transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS A dataset was constructed from a pool of patients who received a first KT in our hospital. For allogeneic transplantation, all donated kidneys were collected from deceased donors. Logistic regression analysis was used to change continuous variables into dichotomous ones through the creation of appropriate cut-off values. A regression model based on the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm was used for dimensionality reduction, feature selection, and survivability prediction. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA) to evaluate the performance and clinical impact of the proposed model. Finally, a 10-fold cross-validation scheme was implemented to verify the model robustness. RESULTS We identified 22 potential variables from which 30 features were selected as survivability predictors. The model established based on the LASSO regression algorithm had shown discrimination with an area under curve (AUC) value of 0.690 (95% confidence interval: 0.557-0.823) and good calibration result. DCA demonstrated clinical applicability of the prognostic model when the intervention progressed to the possibility threshold of 2%. An average AUC value of 0.691 was obtained on the validation data. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that the proposed model can predict the mortality risk for patients after kidney transplants and could help kidney specialists choose kidney recipients with better prognosis.

Local versus distant lung donor procurement does not influence short-term clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to recognize clinically meaningful differences in lung transplant outcomes based on local or distant lung procurement. This could identify if the lung allocation policy change would influence patient outcomes. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study analyzed adult patients who underwent lung transplant from 2006 to 2017. Donor and recipient data were abstracted from a collaborative, prospective registry shared by our local organ procurement organization, and tertiary medical center. Short-term outcomes, 1-year survival, and hospitalization costs were compared between local and distant lung transplants defined by donor service area. RESULTS: Of the 722 lung transplants performed, 392 (54%) had local donors and 330 (46%) had distant donors. Donors were similar in age and cause of death. Recipients were significantly different in diagnosis and local recipients had lower median lung allocation scores (local, 37.3 and distant, 44.9; P < .01). Distant lung transplants had longer total ischemic times (local, 231 ± 52 minutes and distant, 313 ± 48 minutes; P < .01). The rate of major complications, length of hospital stay, and 1-year survival were similar between groups. Distant lung transplants were associated with higher median overall cost (local, $183,542 and distant, $229,871; P < .01). Local lung transplants were more likely to be performed during daytime (local, 333 out of 392 [85%] and distant, 291 out of 330 [61%]; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Local lung transplants are associated with shorter ischemic times, lower cost, and greater likelihood of daytime surgery. Short- and intermediate-term outcomes are similar for lung transplants from local and distant donors. The new lung allocation policy, with higher proportion of distant lung transplants, is likely to incur greater costs but provide similar outcomes.

Nota Técnica 1/2021 - GERTRAN/CCM - 19813 - orientação e fluxos gerais para realização de transplantes de rim, com doadores vivos, em Goiás / Technical Note 1/2021 - GERTRAN / CCM- 19813 - guidance and general flows for performing kidney transplants, with living donors, in Goiás

O transplante é um procedimento cirúrgico que consiste na reposição de um órgão (coração, pulmão, rim, pâncreas, fígado) ou tecido (medula óssea, ossos, córneas) de uma pessoa doente (receptor), por outro órgão ou tecido normal de um doador vivo ou morto. São classificados por dois tipos, sendo doador falecido e doador vivo. Neste último, apenas maiores de idade e capaz juridicamente poderão doar e o procedimento ocorre de modo a preservar a qualidade de vida e a manutenção fisiológica do doador, salvaguardando a segurança do indivíduo, concomitante a espontaneidade da doação. Esta nota técnica tem como objetivo orientar e organizar o fluxo para a realização do transplante com doador vivo em Goiás, de modo a atender a necessidade social e médica, preservando os princípios legais e norteadores do processo

Transplantation is a surgical procedure that consists of replacing an organ (heart, lung, kidney, pancreas, liver) or tissue (bone marrow, bones, corneas) from a sick person (recipient) with another organ or normal tissue from a living or dead donor. They are classified by two types, being deceased donor and living donor. In the latter, only those of legal age and legal capacity can donate and the procedure takes place in order to preserve the quality of life and maintenance physiological function of the donor, safeguarding the individual's safety, concomitant with the spontaneity of the donation. This technical note aims to guide and organize the flow for carrying out the transplant with a live donor in Goiás, in order to meet the social and medical needs, preserving the legal and guiding principles of the process

Usefulness of Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) to predict graft survival in a South Brazilian Cohort / Utilidade do Índice de Perfil de Doadores de Rins (KDPI) para prever a sobrevida do enxerto em uma coorte do Sul do Brasil

Abstract Introduction: Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) has been incorporated in the United States to improve the kidney transplant allocation system. Objectives: To evaluate deceased kidney donors' profile using KDPI and compare to the previous United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) definition of expanded criteria donors (ECD) and assess the KDPI applicability to predict five-year graft survival and renal function in our sample. Methods: Retrospective cohort of 589 kidney transplants from deceased donors performed from January 2009 to May 2013 with follow-up until May 2018. Results: In 589 kidney transplants, 36.6% of donors were classified as ECD and 28.8% had KDPI ≥ 85%. Mean KDPI was 63.1 (95%CI: 60.8-65.3). There was an overlap of standard and ECD in KDPI between 60 and 95 and a significantly lower death-censored graft survival in KDPI ≥ 85% (78.6%); KDPI 0-20: 89.8%, KDPI 21-59: 91.6%, and KDPI 60-84: 83.0%; p = 0.006. The AUC-ROC was 0.577 (95%CI: 0.514-0.641; p = 0.027). Renal function at 5 years was significantly lower according to the incremental KDPI (p < 0.002). KDPI (HR 1.011; 95%CI 1.001-1.020; p = 0.008), donor-specific antibodies (HR 2.77; 95%CI 1.69-4.54; p < 0.001), acute rejection episode (HR 1.73; 95%CI 1.04-2.86; p = 0.034) were independent and significant risk factors for death-censored graft loss at 5 years. Conclusion: In our study, 36.6% were classified as ECD and 28.8% had KDPI ≥ 85%. KDPI score showed a moderate power to predict graft survival at 5 years. Renal function was significantly lower in patients with higher KDPI.

Resumo Introdução: O Índice de Perfil de Doadores de Rins (KDPI) foi adotado nos Estados Unidos para melhorar o sistema de alocação de transplantes renais. Objetivos: avaliar o perfil dos doadores de rim falecidos usando o KDPI e comparar com a definição anterior do United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) de doadores de critérios expandidos (DCE) e avaliar a aplicabilidade do KDPI para prever a sobrevida do enxerto em cinco anos e a função renal em nossa amostra. Métodos: Coorte retrospectiva de 589 transplantes renais de doadores falecidos, realizada de janeiro de 2009 a maio de 2013, com acompanhamento até maio de 2018. Resultados: Em 589 transplantes renais, 36,6% dos doadores foram classificados como DCE e 28,8% apresentaram KDPI ≥ 85%. O KDPI médio foi de 63,1 (IC 95%: 60,8-65,3). Houve uma sobreposição de padrão e DCE no KDPI entre 60 e 95 e uma sobrevida do enxerto censurada por óbito significativamente menor no KDPI ≥ 85% (78,6%); KDPI 0-20: 89,8%, KDPI 21-59: 91,6% e KDPI 60-84: 83,0%; p = 0,006. A ASC-ROC foi de 0,577 (IC 95%: 0,514-0,641; p = 0,027). A função renal aos 5 anos foi significativamente menor de acordo com o aumento do KDPI (p <0,002). KDPI (HR 1.011; 95% CI 1.001-1.020; p = 0.008), anticorpos específicos contra doadores (HR 2,77; 95% CI 1,69-4,54; p <0,001), episódio de rejeição aguda (HR 1,73; 95% CI 1,04-2,86; p = 0,034) foram fatores de risco independentes e significativos para perda do enxerto censurada por óbito em 5 anos. Conclusão: Em nosso estudo, 36,6% foram classificados como DCE e 28,8% apresentaram KDPI ≥ 85%. O escore KDPI mostrou potencial moderado para prever a sobrevida do enxerto em 5 anos. A função renal foi significativamente menor nos pacientes com maior KDPI.

Usefulness of Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) to predict graft survival in a South Brazilian Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) has been incorporated in the United States to improve the kidney transplant allocation system. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate deceased kidney donors' profile using KDPI and compare to the previous United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) definition of expanded criteria donors (ECD) and assess the KDPI applicability to predict five-year graft survival and renal function in our sample. METHODS: Retrospective cohort of 589 kidney transplants from deceased donors performed from January 2009 to May 2013 with follow-up until May 2018. RESULTS: In 589 kidney transplants, 36.6% of donors were classified as ECD and 28.8% had KDPI ≥ 85%. Mean KDPI was 63.1 (95%CI: 60.8-65.3). There was an overlap of standard and ECD in KDPI between 60 and 95 and a significantly lower death-censored graft survival in KDPI ≥ 85% (78.6%); KDPI 0-20: 89.8%, KDPI 21-59: 91.6%, and KDPI 60-84: 83.0%; p = 0.006. The AUC-ROC was 0.577 (95%CI: 0.514-0.641; p = 0.027). Renal function at 5 years was significantly lower according to the incremental KDPI (p < 0.002). KDPI (HR 1.011; 95%CI 1.001-1.020; p = 0.008), donor-specific antibodies (HR 2.77; 95%CI 1.69-4.54; p < 0.001), acute rejection episode (HR 1.73; 95%CI 1.04-2.86; p = 0.034) were independent and significant risk factors for death-censored graft loss at 5 years. CONCLUSION: In our study, 36.6% were classified as ECD and 28.8% had KDPI ≥ 85%. KDPI score showed a moderate power to predict graft survival at 5 years. Renal function was significantly lower in patients with higher KDPI.

Deceased donor organ transplantation potential: A peep into an untapped gold mine.

Organ transplantation is the gold standard for treating end-stage organ diseases, many of whom are on waiting lists. The reasons for this include the nonavailability of suitable organs to be transplanted. In many nations, most of these challenges have been surmounted by the adoption of deceased donor program, which is not so in sub-Saharan countries such as Nigeria. This study is to audit the potentially transplantable organs available from potential deceased donors from a Nigerian tertiary hospital. This is a study of deaths in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the accident and emergency units of the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. Data included the biodata, social history, diagnosis or indications for admission, time of arrival and death, causes of death, associated comorbidities, potential organs available, social history, and availability of relations at the time of death. There were 104 deaths in the ICU and 10 patients in the accident and emergency unit. There were 66 males (57.9%) and 48 females (42.1%). Eighty patients were Muslims (70.2%) and 34 were Christians (19.8%). A total of 33 participants were unmarried (28.9%),whereas 81 (71.1%) were married. The tribes of the patients were Yoruba (105, 92.1%), Igbo (7, 6.1%), Hausa (1, 0.9%), and Nupe (1, 0.9%). The age range was 0.08-85 years. Twenty-two (19.3%) had primary and the remaining had at least secondary education. The causes of death were myriad, and there were relatives available at the times of all deaths. The Maastricht classification of the deaths were Class I - 1 (0.9%), Class II - 37 (32.2%), Class III - 9 (7.8%), Class IV - 20 (17.4%), and Class V - 47(40.9%). There were no transplantable organs in 42 (36.5%), one organ in eight (7%), two organs in two (7%), three organs in one (0.9%), four organs in 13 (11.3%), five organs in six (5.2%), six organs in 11 (9.6%), seven organs in 11 (9.6%), eight organs in five (13%), and nine organs in five (4.3%). Deceased donor sources of organs are worthy of being exploited to improve organ transplantation in Nigeria.

Organ Donation and Primary Central Nervous System Tumors.

Primary central nervous system tumors can be the cause of brain death. Not all of them contraindicate the donation of organs and tissues for transplant. A survey of cases was carried out in our country in which it was observed that the number of brain deaths caused by primary tumors was low, of the order of 2%, with an x (media) of 3 by year, which would increase the potential for donation. Medical records, an anatomopathologic study, and a detailed physical examination will be fundamental when applying the donor selection criteria. Nuclear magnetic resonance in expert hands has a sensitivity of 96% to catalog the benignity or malignancy of this type of tumors.

The impact of change in definition of increased-risk donors on survival after lung transplant.

OBJECTIVES: To study the impact of using the US Public Health Service broadened definition of "increased-risk" donors (2013) in comparison with "high-risk" (1994) and standard infectious risk donors on lung transplant recipient outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent lung transplant between January 1, 2006, and May 31, 2017, in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients were divided into 2 cohorts, recipients of: (1) high-risk donors: January 1, 2006, to October 1, 2013, and (2) increased-risk donors: January 1, 2014, to May 31, 2017, and compared with matched recipients who received standard-risk donors. Risks for acute rejection, patient, and graft survival using propensity score matched cohorts, multivariable logistic, and Cox models were examined. RESULTS: In total, 18,490 lung transplant recipients were analyzed with 36% transplanted during the increased-risk donor definition period. The proportion of donors classified as nonstandard infectious risk increased with the definition change (8% high-risk donors vs 22% increased-risk donors; P < .001). In both cohorts, male patients with a lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second and greater creatinine were more likely to receive an organ from increased risk donors. Neither graft nor patient survival differed by donor type in either period. Acute treated rejection within 1 year did not differ by period for recipients of increased risk donors (odds ratio, 0.87; P = .23) or recipients of high-risk donors (odds ratio, 1.2; P = .27). CONCLUSIONS: The 2013 broadened definition of donor risk increased the proportion of nonstandard infectious risk donors. Recipients of increased/high-risk donors had similar graft and patient survival compared with standard-risk donors.

Association Between Declined Offers of Deceased Donor Kidney Allograft and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Candidates.

Importance: In the United States, substantial disparities in access to kidney transplant exist for wait-listed candidates with end-stage renal disease. The implications of transplant centers' willingness to accept kidney offers for access to transplant and mortality outcomes are unknown. Objective: To determine the outcomes for wait-listed kidney transplant candidates after the transplant center's refusal of a deceased donor kidney offer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study obtained data from the United Network for Organ Sharing Potential Transplant Recipient data set on all deceased donor kidney offers in the United States made between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2015. The final study cohort included adult patients who were wait-listed for kidney transplant and received at least 1 allograft offer during the study period (N = 280 041). Data analysis was conducted from June 1, 2018, to March 30, 2019. Exposure: Candidate state of residence. Main Outcomes and Measures: Waiting list outcome event groups included received deceased donor allograft, received living donor allograft, died while on the waiting list, removed from the waiting list without a transplant, or still on the waiting list at the end of follow-up. Results: Among the 280 041 kidney transplant candidates included in the study, the mean (SD) age at wait-listing was 51.1 (13.1) years, and male patients were predominant (171 517 [61.2%]). In this cohort, 81 750 candidates (29.2%) received a deceased donor kidney allograft, 30 870 (11.0%) received a living donor allograft, 25 967 (9.3%) died while on the waiting list, and 59 359 (21.2%) were removed from the waiting list. Overall, 10 candidates with at least 1 previous allograft offer died each day during the study period. Time to first offer was similar for candidates who received deceased donor kidney allograft compared with those who died while waiting (median [interquartile range {IQR}] time, 79 [16-426] days vs 78 [17-401] days, respectively). Deceased donor allograft recipients had a median of 17 offers (IQR, 6-44) over 422 days (IQR, 106-909 days), whereas candidates who died while waiting received a median of 16 offers (IQR, 6-41) over 651 days (IQR, 304-1117 days). Most kidneys (84%) were declined on behalf of at least 1 candidate before being accepted for transplant. As reported by centers, organ or donor quality concerns accounted for 8 416 474 (92.6%) of all declined offers, whereas offers were infrequently refused because of patient-related factors (232 193 [2.6%]), logistical limitations (49 492 [0.5%]), or other concerns. The odds of death after an offer and the median number of offers received prior to death varied considerably by state. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that transplant candidates appeared to receive a large number of viable deceased donor kidney offers that were refused on their behalf by transplant centers, potentially exacerbating the detrimental consequences of the organ shortage; increased transparency in organ allocation process and decisions may improve patient-centered care and access to kidney transplant.

Quantification of corneal transparency in post-mortem human corneas using laser scatter image analysis.

BACKGROUND: The cornea is a highly transparent structure covering the anterior one-fifth of the eyeball. The suitability of post-mortem donor corneas for keratoplasty is currently qualitatively assessed. This makes inferences prone to bias and subjective variability. This study aimed to develop a simple, feasible and cost-effective method to quantify corneal transparency. METHODS: An artificial anterior chamber was modified to provide a central transparent passage and a standardised pressure segment. All corneas graded 'fair' were included in this study. The corneoscleral buttons were mounted on the modified artificial anterior chamber. The mounted chamber was held in a horizontal position at a fixed distance from a white projection screen. The laser source was placed in alignment with an artificial anterior chamber so that it passed through the centre of the cornea. A camera mounted on a tripod stand was placed at a prefixed distance. An image of the scattered laser spot that formed after the laser passed through the mounted cornea on the screen was captured with a single digital camera and standardised settings. Image analysis was performed using ImageJ, an open platform for scientific image analysis. The average red pixel intensity, max intensity, and full-width half max were calculated. RESULTS: The average red intensity was 132.45 ± 6.65 SD. The mean for max intensity was 51.1 ± 3.78 SD and the full-width half max 787.7 ± 84.7 SD. CONCLUSION: Laser quantification is a simple and cost-effective method of quantifying corneal transparency. The study lends proof to the principle involved.

The efficacy of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in liver transplantation from non-heart-beating donors: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: A systematic review and meta-analysis was made to see whether extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in liver transplantation could improve non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs) recipients' outcomes compared with donors after brain death (DBDs) recipients. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for eligible studies. The study eligible criteria are cohort or case-control studies using ECMO in all NHBDs; studies involved a comparison group of DBDs; and studies evaluated 1-year graft and patient survival rate in NHBDs and DBDs groups. RESULTS: Four studies with 704 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1-year patient survival rate in NHBDs recipients compared with DBDs recipients was 0.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-1.55). The pooled OR of 1-year graft survival rate in NHBDs recipients compared with DBDs recipients was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.26-0.81). NHBDs recipients were at greater risks to the occurrence of primary nonfunction (PNF) (OR = 7.12, 95% CI, 1.84-27.52) and ischemic cholangiopathy (IC) (OR = 9.46, 95% CI, 2.76-32.4) than DBDs recipients. CONCLUSIONS: ECMO makes 1-year patient survival acceptable in NHBDs recipients. One-year graft survival rate was lower in NHBDs recipients than in DBDs recipients. Compared with DBDs recipients, the risks to develop PNF and IC were increased among NHBDs recipients.

Long-term outcomes of en-bloc renal transplantation from paediatric donors into adult recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Transplant units are exploring strategies to increase the availability of donor kidneys. The use of en-bloc kidney transplantation (EBKT) from paediatric donors represents one potential solution. We present our long-term experience with paediatric EBKT among adult recipients. METHODS: Twenty-three paediatric to adult EBKTs were performed by the Irish National Kidney Transplant Service between 1990 and 2016. The primary outcome variable was long-term en-bloc allograft survival rate. Secondary outcome variables were incidence of allograft thrombosis, incidence of delayed graft function, overall patient survival and serum creatinine at most recent follow-up. Outcomes were compared to single kidney transplant recipients from the same time period. RESULTS: Mean donor age was 1.8 ± 0.97 years (range: 7 months to 3 years). Recipient age was 46 ± 12 years. Mean follow-up was 133 ± 64 months (range: 36-264). Overall graft survival was 100%, 91% and 80% after 1, 5 and 10 years respectively, compared to 92%, 79% and 61% in single kidney transplant recipients (p = 0.04). There were 5 cases of allograft failure, 3 due to death from unrelated causes. Median time to graft failure was 108 months (range: 36-172). Mean serum creatinine was 72.6 ± 21.6 µmol/l after the follow-up period. There were no cases of graft thrombosis or delayed graft function. Overall survival was 96.4%, 88.0%, 76.23% and 50.5% at 1, 5, 10 and 20 years respectively. CONCLUSION: En-bloc paediatric kidney transplantation is associated with excellent long-term allograft and patient survival and is a feasible strategy for increasing the transplant donor pool in carefully selected recipients.

Objective Donor Scoring System for Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: There is no objective method to estimate post-lung transplant survival solely on the basis of cumulative donor risk factors. METHODS: The United Network Organ Sharing thoracic transplant database was queried to identify patients who underwent lung transplantation between 2005 and 2015. A Cox proportional hazard model was generated using a training set to identify donor risk factors significantly associated with posttransplant survival. Significant donor risk factors were assigned a score on the basis of their hazard ratio. Donor risk score was calculated for each patient by adding the individual donor risk factor scores. Donors in the validation set were then categorized into low-risk (score = 0), intermediate-risk (score = 1), and high-risk (score >1) categories on the basis of the cumulative risk score. The Lung Allocation Score was used as a surrogate for recipient risk. Survival for each risk group was calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: The donor risk groups' respective survival at 1 year was 85%, 81%, and 77%, and at 5 years it was 53%, 50%, and 42% (p < 0.001). The combination of low-risk recipients and low-risk donors had 1- and 5-year survival of 89% and 59%, respectively. The combination of high-risk recipients and high-risk donors had 1- and 5-year survival of 70% and 30%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed lung donor scoring system is a simple, easy to use method that can aid transplant surgeons in the selection of a potential lung transplant donor. Using the lung donor score in conjunction with the Lung Allocation Score can allow for matching of recipients and donors, to optimize posttransplant outcomes.

Kidney Transplantation Using Expanded-Criteria Deceased Donors: A Comparison With Ideal Deceased Donors and Non-Expanded-Criteria Deceased Donors.

PURPOSE: The use of expanded-criteria deceased-donor (ECD) kidneys must be evaluated within the objective perspective of critical organ shortage and graft function and survival. In this study, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of ECD reliance with concurrent use of ideal-criteria deceased donors (IDDs) and non-ECDs in adult renal transplantation. METHODS: Between February 2000 and December 2015, we analyzed 405 deceased-donor renal transplants, specifically 129 grafts (31.9%) from ECDs, 233 grafts (57.5%) from non-ECDs, and 43 grafts (10.6%) from IDDs. ECDs were classified according to the United Network for Organ Sharing guidelines, while an IDD was defined as a younger person (10-39 years of age) with no medical risk factors who died from a traumatic head injury. Donor and recipient risk factors were separately analyzed and correlated with recipient graft function, and survival was evaluated. RESULTS: ECDs were older (56.8 ± 6.3 years); showed increased incidence of hypertension, diabetes, and cerebrovascular brain death; and had a higher pre-retrieval serum creatinine level than the other groups. ECD kidney recipients were also older (50.6 ± 9.8 years), had a shorter waiting time (P = .031), and demonstrated a low frequency of re-transplantation (P = .028). Long-term renal function followed longitudinally was lower in ECD kidney recipients until five years after transplantation, while the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) level at 7 and 10 years did not differ significantly among the groups (P = .074 and .262, respectively). There were no significant differences in terms of graft survival (P = .394) or patient survival (P = .737) among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although the long-term renal function followed longitudinally was lower in ECD kidney recipients, the use of renal grafts from ECDs is an acceptable method to resolve the disparity of critical organ shortage. However, the classification of the high-risk group should be updated with consideration given to differences in regional characteristics.

Hepatic artery stenosis after liver transplant: Donation after cardiac death donor vs donation after brain death donor grafts.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery stenosis (HAS) after liver transplant (LT) is a source of significant morbidity. Some reports have suggested higher arterial complications in patients who receive donation after cardiac death (DCD) livers. METHODS: A total of 2860 consecutive LT were reviewed from a prospectively collected database. All angiograms performed in LT recipients were reviewed and primary patency rates determined by need for further intervention or graft loss due to HAT. RESULTS: Hepatic artery stenosis was seen in 4.6% of DCD and donation after brain death (DBD) recipients. Recipient male gender, age at transplant, complex donor hepatic artery anatomy, and prolonged operative time were all associated with HAS, but not DCD status. While HAS in recipients of DCD grafts required more stents (1.7% vs 0.6%, P = 0.04) and had worse primary patency rates (logrank, P = 0.02), outcomes as defined by HAT, patient and graft survival were not significantly different between the recipients of DCD or DBD grafts. CONCLUSION: We observed no significant difference in the incidence of hepatic artery complications, patient survival, or graft survival in recipients of DCD or DBD grafts. However, HAS in DCD recipients had worse primary patency and a higher need for stent placement.

Liver transplantation from type II donation after cardiac death donor with normothermic regional perfusion and normothermic machine perfusion. / Trasplante hepático con injerto de donante en asistolia tipo 2 con perfusión regional normotérmica y máquina de perfusión normotérmica.

BACKGROUND: The current imbalance between donor supply and patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation (LT) is significant. To resolve this situation, marginal organs, such as those from type 2 donation after cardiac death (DCD2), are being considered. METHODS: In the present article, we present the first LT with a new protocol consisting in normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) and normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) for a type 2 DCD graft initially rejected for LT. RESULTS: After a favorable evolution with NMP (improved macroscopic appearance of the graft, acid-base equilibrium control and bile production), the transplantation was performed without major incidents. The evolution of the graft and patient were favorable. After 3 months, cholangiography showed no signs of ischemic cholangiopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Three-month patient and graft survival are encouraging, but more cases are needed to test the clinical efficacy of the new protocol.

New Zealand transplant patients and organ transplantation in China: some ethical considerations.

In this viewpoint article we consider the situation of organ procurement from China, and address some of the ethical aspects arising for health professionals when New Zealand transplant patients contemplate traveling to China for an organ. We also consider some of the challenges facing health professionals involved in providing care to such patients.

[Combined thorax-abdomen extraction in a Maastricht type III donor]. / Extracción combinada tórax-abdomen en un donante en asistolia tipo III de Maastricht.

Donation after circulatory death (Maastricht type III donation) or controlled cardiac death refers to the retrieval of organs for transplantation purposes following death confirmed using circulatory criteria after the withdrawal of life support. The persistent shortfall in organ availability has prompted the development of donation programs following circulatory death for lung transplantation. The combined thorax-abdomen extraction in these cases is carried out in only twelve centres in Spain, while the combined use of abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) is even more exceptional. The first case of pulmonary and abdominal extraction in a Maastricht type III donor in Navarre with this type of preservation techniques is a milestone and the success achieved shows that it is a feasible and safe procedure.