Clinical analysis of acute postoperative pain after total laparoscopic hysterectomy for adenomyosis and uterine fibroids - a prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcome of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and postoperative pain characteristics and compare the pain severity after TLH for adenomyosis or uterine fibroids. METHODS: This prospective observational study collected 101 patients received TLH for adenomyosis (AD group) including 41 patients were injected goserelin (3.6 mg) 28 days before TLH, while other adenomyosis patients received TLH without preoperative treatment, and 113 patients received TLH for uterine fibroids (UF group). Pain scores were evaluated at different time sites from operation day to postoperative 72 h using the numeric rating scale. Clinical data were collected from clinical record. RESULTS: Operative time and anaesthetic time were longer in the AD group than those in the UF group (66.88 ± 8.65 vs. 64.46 ± 7.21, p = 0.04; 83.95 ± 10.05 vs. 79.77 ± 6.88, p < 0.01), severe endometriosis was quite more common in AD group (23.76% vs. 2.65%, p < 0.01). Postoperative usage of Flurbiprofen in AD group were more than that of UF group (15.48 ± 38.00 vs. 4.79 ± 18.16, p = 0.02). Total pains and abdominal visceral pains of AD group were more severe compared with UF group in motion and rest pattern at several time sites, while incision pain and shoulder pain were similar. The total postoperative pains after goserelin preoperative treatment in AD group were less than that without goserelin preoperative treatment (p < 0.05). The levels of serum NPY, PGE2 and NGF after laparoscopic hysterectomy of adenomyosis reduced with GnRH agonist pretreatment. CONCLUSIONS: Acute postoperative pain for adenomyosis and uterine fibroids showed considerably different severity, postoperative total pain and abdominal visceral pains of TLH for adenomyosis were more severe compared with uterine fibroids. While patients received goserelin before laparoscopic hysterectomy of adenomyosis suffered from less severity of postoperative total pain than that without goserelin preoperative treatment.

Acute postoperative pain for adenomyosis and uterine fibroids showed considerably different severity, postoperative total pain and abdominal visceral pains of TLH for adenomyosis were more severe compared with uterine fibroids.Patients received goserelin before laparoscopic hysterectomy of adenomyosis suffered from less severity of postoperative total pain than that without goserelin preoperative treatment.

Paragastric Autonomic Neural Blockade to Prevent Early Visceral Pain and Associated Symptoms After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Visceral pain (VP) following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy remains a substantial problem. VP is associated with autonomic symptoms, especially nausea and vomiting, and is unresponsive to traditional pain management algorithms aimed at alleviating somatic (incisional) pain. The present study was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic paragastric autonomic neural blockade (PG-ANB) in managing the symptoms associated with VP following sleeve gastrectomy. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial involved patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at two high-volume institutions. The patients were randomized to laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block with or without PG-ANB. The primary outcome was patient-reported pain scores assessed at 1, 8, and 24 h postoperatively. The secondary outcome measures were analgesic requirements, nausea, vomiting, hiccups, and hemodynamic changes immediately after PG-ANB and postoperatively. RESULTS: In total, 145 patients (block group, n = 72; control group, n = 73) were included in the study. The heart rate and mean arterial pressure significantly decreased 10 min after PG-ANB. The visual analog scale score for pain was significantly lower in the PG-ANB than in the control group at 1 h postoperatively (p < 0.001) and 8 h postoperatively (p < 0.001). Vomiting, nausea, sialorrhea, and hiccups were significantly less prevalent in the PG-ANB group. Patients in the PG-ANB group received fewer cumulative doses of analgesics at 1 h postoperatively (p = 0.003) and 8 h postoperatively (p < 0.001). No differences between the groups were detected at 24 h (p = 0.298). No complications related to PG-ANB occurred. CONCLUSION: PG-ANB safely and effectively reduces early VP, associated autonomic symptoms, and analgesic requirements after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Punctate Midline Myelotomy: A Historical Overview and Case Series with Detailed Efficacy and Side Effect Profiles.

OBJECTIVE: To review our experience with punctate midline myelotomy (PMM) for malignant and benign visceral pain with an emphasis on detailed side-effect profiles and efficacy. METHODS: Thirteen adults (5 men) underwent microsurgical transverse-crush PMM. RESULTS: Median follow-up for the benign pain group (n = 6) was 17.5 months (10-72) and for the malignant group (n = 7) was 8 months (0.5-31). Five of seven patients in the malignant pain group obtained excellent, lasting relief. Two had initial relief followed by worsening pain with disease progression. In the benign pain group, two patients with endodermal-origin pain (gastrointestinal tract, bladder) had complete, long-lasting relief. Three patients with mesodermal-origin pain (ureter) had excellent relief for 2-3 months, followed by recurrence in two and partial (40%) recurrence in the third. One man with pre-existing cervical myelopathy underwent PMM for benign testicular-region pain from which he had long-term relief but only transient relief of coexisting low-back and leg pain. There were no motor deficits in either group, and all patients remained ambulatory and continent. The most common side effect was transient numbness of the medial leg and foot. Two patients (both with pre-existing spinal pathology) reported persistent moderate reduction of bowel, bladder, and sexual sensation. CONCLUSIONS: PMM offers substantial pain relief for carefully selected patients with intractable visceral pain. Relief from primarily endoderm-derived structures was most complete and long-lasting. Relief from mesoderm-derived structures was typically transient or incomplete. There was essentially no relief from pain of ectoderm-derived structures. Detailed preoperative counseling is important, especially for those with pre-existing neurologic deficits.

Midthoracic Punctate Midline Myelotomy for Treatment of Chronic, Intractable, Nonmalignant, Abdominal Visceral Pain: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Punctate midline myelotomy (PMM) is a surgical procedure that damages the ascending fibers of the postsynaptic dorsal column (PSDC) pathway to interrupt visceral pain transmission.1-3 It can offer relief to patients with chronic visceral pain conditions that are refractory to other treatments. Here, we present a surgical video of midthoracic PMM in a patient with chronic, intractable, nonmalignant visceral abdominal pain that failed over a decade of medical treatment. We choose T7-8 as the level for laminectomy in patients with pelvic or lower abdominal pain, because the postsynaptic pain fibers transmitting visceral pain sensation from the lower abdominal organs will invariably be caudal to this level. The patient developed immediate and complete relief of her visceral pain after the procedure, which was sustained through the 11-wk follow-up period to date and was able to be weaned off narcotics. Postoperatively, she remained full strength and had no impairment of light touch or proprioception of her lower extremities. Detailed physical examination showed a reduced vibratory sensation on the glabrous skin of her great toes. Regarding patient-reported sensory changes (not detected on physical examination), she reported some numbness on the insides of her feet that had resolved by 11-wk follow-up. She also reported some numbness of the vulva, but not of the vagina. However, by 11-wk follow-up, she reported this had resolved and she had normal sexual function. The only persistent sensation at 11-wk follow-up was slight tingling in her toes that was not bothersome to her.4 The patient presented in the following video consented to both the surgical procedure and the publication of her clinical history and operative video.

Limited Midline Myelotomy for Intractable Visceral Pain: Surgical Techniques and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Limited midline myelotomy targets the midline nociceptive pathway for intractable visceral pain. Multiple techniques are available for limited midline myelotomy; however, outcome data for each technique are sparse. OBJECTIVE: To review our experience with open and percutaneous approaches for limited midline myelotomy for intractable visceral pain. METHODS: Patients who underwent limited midline myelotomy for intractable visceral pain were reviewed. Myelotomy was performed using 3 techniques: open limited myelotomy, percutaneous radiofrequency myelotomy, and percutaneous mechanical myelotomy. Demographic and perioperative clinical data were recorded. In addition to the visual analog scale and Karnofsy performance score, outcomes were categorized as excellent (no pain), good (considerable reduction in pain, not requiring opioids stronger than codeine), fair (minimal reduction in pain, but no change in opioid medication requirement), and poor (no reduction in pain). RESULTS: Eight patients (median age 56.5 yr, 6 females) underwent limited myelotomy. Four patients underwent open limited thoracic myelotomy with excellent pain outcomes. Three patients underwent percutaneous radiofrequency lesioning with fair (n = 1) and poor outcomes (n = 2). One patient underwent percutaneous mechanical lesioning with a good outcome (n = 1). The median duration of follow-up was 11 wk (2-54 wk). Two patients reported minor sensory complications after the procedure. CONCLUSION: In our preliminary experience, outcomes for open limited thoracic myelotomy were superior to percutaneous approaches. Given the limited utilization of this technique, multicenter registries are needed to further evaluate the best surgical technique for limited midline myelotomy.

Alleviating visceral cancer pain in patients with pancreatic cancer using cryoablation and celiac plexus block.

Little is known about the effects of pancreas cryoablation (PCA) on abdominalgia in pancreatic cancer patients or its synergism with celiac plexus block (CPB). In patients without abdominalgia, to investigate the effects of PCA; in patients with abdominalgia, to investigate the pain-alleviating effects of PCA+CPB. Sixty-two patients were enrolled in this retrospective review; 12 without abdominalgia refused PCA, 15 without abdominalgia received PCA to reduce their tumor load and 35 with abdominalgia received PCA+CPB to reduce tumor load and alleviate pain. All PCA and PCA+CPB procedures were performed successfully. Some slight adverse effects (e.g. increased serum amylase, abdominal distension and nausea, abdominal bleeding) had disappeared by 3weeks, spontaneously or after symptomatic treatment. In patients without abdominalgia, pain occurred in one-third of cases (all with pancreatic head cancer) after PCA but had stopped 1-12days after treatment; in patients with abdominalgia before treatment, pain stopped immediately after PCA+CPB in 18 cases and 2-24days after treatment in 17 (all with pancreatic head cancer); a significant difference was found between pretreatment and post-treatment pain frequency (P=0.0019), regardless of the presence of advanced (P=0.0096) or metastatic (P=0.0072) cancer. The average time to pain relief was approximately 7days after both PCA and PCA+CPB, and abdominalgia did not recur for more than 8weeks. PCA may cause short-term pain in some pancreatic cancer patients. Combined PCA+CPB can alleviate cancer pain for more than 8weeks, without severe side effects.