RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia and eclampsia are among the leading direct causes of maternal death and morbidity worldwide. Up to 34% of maternal deaths in Tanzania are due to preeclampsia/ eclampsia. Magnesium sulfate is recommended for preventing and treating convulsions in women with Preeclampsia or eclampsia. However, evidence suggests limited knowledge of its dosage and proper toxicity assessment after administration among health care providers. AIM OF THE STUDY: This study explored nurse-midwives' perspectives on providing MgSO4 to patients with preeclampsia or eclampsia in Tanzania. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive exploratory qualitative study using in-depth interviews was conducted to understand nurse-midwives' perspectives on providing magnesium sulfate to patients with PE/E. Nineteen nurse-midwives were interviewed from three hospitals in the Dar es Salaam region. We used a semi-structured interview guide in Kiswahili language to collect data. All interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. We analyzed data using inductive content analysis. RESULTS: This study revealed that nurse-midwives provide magnesium sulfate to save the lives of women and their unborn children. Nurse-midwives reasoned that confidence in their skill enhances provision of magnesium sulfate. However, they were concerned about its effect on the progress of labour. Ineffective use of magnesium sulfate emerged from inadequate training, an unsupportive work environment, and underutilization of the existing guidelines. CONCLUSION: Nurse-midwives have clear drive to provide magnesium sulfate to women with preeclampsia or eclampsia. However, inadequate training, underutilization of guidelines and unsupportive work environment lead to ineffective use of magnesium sulfate. Targeted practical training should be emphasized for nurse-midwives mastery of clinical competencies.
Assuntos
Eclampsia , Sulfato de Magnésio , Pré-Eclâmpsia , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Humanos , Sulfato de Magnésio/uso terapêutico , Sulfato de Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Gravidez , Pré-Eclâmpsia/tratamento farmacológico , Eclampsia/tratamento farmacológico , Tanzânia , Adulto , Enfermeiros Obstétricos/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Magnesium sulfate is the most utilized anticonvulsant for treating patients with eclampsia and pre-eclampsia. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the 12-h regimen of magnesium sulfate outweighs the 24-h regimen in both efficacy and safety in the management of patients with mild or severe pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. METHODS: We searched six electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Ovid, and Google Scholar. This search was conducted to yield any studies that were published until 15 January 2023. We did the statistical analysis plan by Review Manager Software version 5.4. RESULTS: We included 13 randomized control trials with 2813 patients in this systematic review. Our meta-analysis revealed that there were no statistically significant differences between the 12-h regimen of the magnesium sulfate group and the 24-h regimen of the magnesium sulfate group in our outcome of interest: occurrence of seizure (RD: -0.00, 95% CI [-0.01, 0.00], P = 0.56), diminished deep tendon reflexes (RD: -0.00, 95% CI [-0.01, 0.01], P = 0.80), respiratory depression (RD: -0.00, 95% CI [-0.02, 0.01], P = 0.57), and pulmonary edema (RD: -0.00, 95% CI [-0.01, 0.01], P = 0.85). CONCLUSION: Our study showed no statistically significant difference in effectiveness and toxicity risk between the 12-h and 24-h regimens.
Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes , Eclampsia , Sulfato de Magnésio , Pré-Eclâmpsia , Humanos , Sulfato de Magnésio/uso terapêutico , Sulfato de Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Gravidez , Feminino , Eclampsia/tratamento farmacológico , Pré-Eclâmpsia/tratamento farmacológico , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Esquema de Medicação , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento , Convulsões/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND Preeclampsia presents with gestational proteinuria, usually after 20 weeks of gestation, and can be complicated by generalized tonic-clonic seizures of eclampsia. Particularly in countries with limited healthcare resources, preeclampsia and eclampsia are major causes of maternal morbidity and mortality. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the presentation, management, and outcomes of 185 women with preeclampsia and eclampsia in 2 maternity hospitals in Omdurman, Sudan, between January and December 2020. MATERIAL AND METHODS An analytical retrospective study was conducted in 2 main maternity hospitals in Omdurman, Sudan, between January and December 2020. The study included 185 pregnant women with preeclampsia or eclampsia. Data on clinical and obstetric characteristics (history of the illness, comorbid diseases, parity, gravida, multifetal pregnancy, and laboratory investigations), medications used, and maternal and neonatal outcomes were obtained for the diagnosis. The data were analyzed using the SPSS version 27. RESULTS Results: The mean age was 27.2±6.3 years, with 42.7% primigravida, 30% had a triple-drug regimen, nifedipine was the most common antihypertensive (60.5%), and 17.3% of patients underwent observation only. The seizure rate was 20%, with 92.73% controlled with magnesium sulfate. The antihypertensive regimen before delivery was significantly associated with the mode of delivery (P=0.001) and maternal outcomes (P=0.047); the regimen used after delivery significantly achieved blood pressure control (P=0.043) and improved maternal outcomes (P=0.007), but not fetal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Maternal outcomes were markedly affected by the antihypertensive drug regimens used and the patient's seizure control status, and use of anti-convulsants successfully controlled all seizures.
Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes , Anti-Hipertensivos , Eclampsia , Pré-Eclâmpsia , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Eclampsia/tratamento farmacológico , Sudão , Pré-Eclâmpsia/tratamento farmacológico , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem , Resultado da Gravidez , Convulsões/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In low-resource settings, magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) for preeclampsia is administered majorly through an injection into the gluteal muscles 4-hourly for 24 hours. The repeated injections are very painful and may lead to infection, abscess formation, and reduced compliance. OBJECTIVE: To determine the acceptability of Springfusor® pump for the administration of Magnesium Sulphate in preeclampsia and eclampsia. DESIGN: Randomized Open Label Clinical Trial. METHODS: The study was conducted at Kawempe National Referral Hospital. Eligible women had a systolic blood pressure of ≥140mmHg and or diastolic blood pressure >90mmHg, proteinuria ≥+1, and the physician's decision to start on MgSO4. Four-hundred-ninety-six participants were randomized to a Springfusor® pump group (n = 248) or control (standard of care) (n = 248) administration of MgSO4. Intervention group had a loading dose (4gm of 50% MgSO4 intravenously over 20 minutes) and maintenance therapy (1gm of 50% MgSO4 intravenously per hour for 24 hours) administered using the Springfusor®. The standard of care (SOC) group received a loading dose of 4gm of 20% MgSO4 IV over 15-20 minutes, followed by 10gm of 50% MgSO4 intramuscular (5gm in each buttock) and a maintenance dose of 5gm of 50% MgSO4 was administered IM every 4 hours for 24 hours. Both arms received the rest of the care for preeclampsia/eclampsia as per the hospital guidelines. Acceptability of the method of administration was assessed using a Likert scale (1-5; 1 and 2: acceptable and 3-5: unacceptable). Pain at the site of MgSO4 administration was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale 1-7, (1 minimal pain and 7 worst pain). Comparisons were assessed with the Chi-square test, Mann Whitney-Wilcoxon test, and Students' t-test. RESULTS: Intervention arm; was more acceptable than the standard of care arm, (95.3% vs70.3%; p<0.001), had a lower median pain score, (2(CI: 2-2), vs 4(CI: 4-5) p<0.001), and fewer side effects. Maternal mortality was comparable between groups (0.8% in the intervention arm vs 1.2% in the IM arm). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial No PACTR201712002887266 (https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/).
Assuntos
Eclampsia , Sulfato de Magnésio , Pré-Eclâmpsia , Padrão de Cuidado , Humanos , Sulfato de Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Sulfato de Magnésio/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Pré-Eclâmpsia/tratamento farmacológico , Gravidez , Eclampsia/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Adulto Jovem , Injeções IntramuscularesRESUMO
RATIONALE: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a rare complication commonly associated with headache and acute changes in blood pressure that results from a variety of causes, culminating in vasogenic cerebral edema in the occipital and parietal lobes of the brain. PATIENT CONCERNS: We report here a woman who suffered from headache, generalized tonic-clonic seizures, and cortical blindness in the late postpartum period. DIAGNOSES: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was treated with amlodipine besylate tablets for hypertension, dehydration with mannitol and glycerin fructose, and antispasmodic treatment with sodium valproate and oxcarbazepine. OUTCOMES: On day 2, the patient became conscious, headache and vision improved. One week later, symptoms and signs disappeared, blood pressure returned to normal, and brain MRI lesions disappeared in re-examination. LESSONS: Eclampsia associated with PRES is reversible in most cases, but it is a serious and potentially life-threatening obstetric emergency. If adequate treatment is provided in a timely manner, most women will make a full recovery. Attention needs to be paid to timely and adequate treatment, as well as appropriate follow-up and support for patients with PRES.
Assuntos
Encefalopatias , Eclampsia , Síndrome da Leucoencefalopatia Posterior , Transtornos Puerperais , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Eclampsia/diagnóstico , Eclampsia/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome da Leucoencefalopatia Posterior/diagnóstico por imagem , Síndrome da Leucoencefalopatia Posterior/etiologia , Período Pós-Parto , Encefalopatias/diagnóstico , Transtornos Puerperais/diagnóstico , Transtornos Puerperais/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Puerperais/etiologia , Cefaleia/complicaçõesRESUMO
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a rare neurologic condition and a feared complication of eclampsia. It is evidenced by acute neurologic dysfunction secondary to cerebral edema and is typically reversible in nature. Although it is a relatively new diagnosis, an increasing amount of literature has described its occurrence, including an association with hypomagnesemia. We present a case wherein a 24-year-old parturient developed PRES and eclampsia in the setting of symptomatic hypermagnesemia, requiring management with lorazepam after seizures developed. Here we detail her clinical course, including the unique challenges of treating eclampsia and PRES in the setting of magnesium toxicity.
Assuntos
Edema Encefálico , Eclampsia , Síndrome da Leucoencefalopatia Posterior , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Eclampsia/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome da Leucoencefalopatia Posterior/induzido quimicamente , Síndrome da Leucoencefalopatia Posterior/complicações , Síndrome da Leucoencefalopatia Posterior/diagnóstico , Magnésio , Convulsões/induzido quimicamente , Convulsões/complicações , Edema Encefálico/induzido quimicamente , Edema Encefálico/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Magnesium sulphate is the drug of choice for the prevention and treatment of women with eclampsia. Regimens for administration of this drug have evolved over the years, but there is no clarity on the comparative benefits or harm of alternative regimens. This is an update of a review first published in 2010. OBJECTIVES: To assess if one magnesium sulphate regimen is better than another when used for the care of women with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, or both, to reduce the risk of severe morbidity and mortality for the woman and her baby. SEARCH METHODS: We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (29 April 2022), and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised trials and cluster-randomised trials comparing different regimens for administration of magnesium sulphate used in women with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, or both. Comparisons included different dose regimens, intramuscular versus intravenous route for maintenance therapy, and different durations of therapy. We excluded studies with quasi-random or cross-over designs. We included abstracts of conference proceedings if compliant with the trustworthiness assessment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: For this update, two review authors assessed trials for inclusion, performed risk of bias assessment, and extracted data. We checked data for accuracy. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: For this update, a total of 16 trials (3020 women) met our inclusion criteria: four trials (409 women) compared regimens for women with eclampsia, and 12 trials (2611 women) compared regimens for women with pre-eclampsia. Most of the included trials had small sample sizes and were conducted in low- and middle-income countries. Eleven trials reported adequate randomisation and allocation concealment. Blinding of participants and clinicians was not possible in most trials. The included studies were for the most part at low risk of attrition and reporting bias. Treatment of women with eclampsia (four comparisons) One trial compared a loading dose-alone regimen with a loading dose plus maintenance dose regimen (80 women). It is uncertain whether either regimen has an effect on the risk of recurrence of convulsions or maternal death (very low-certainty evidence). One trial compared a lower-dose regimen with standard-dose regimen over 24 hours (72 women). It is uncertain whether either regimen has an effect on the risk of recurrence of convulsion, severe morbidity, perinatal death, or maternal death (very low-certainty evidence). One trial (137 women) compared intravenous (IV) versus standard intramuscular (IM) maintenance regimen. It is uncertain whether either route has an effect on recurrence of convulsions, death of the baby before discharge (stillbirth and neonatal death), or maternal death (very low-certainty evidence). One trial (120 women) compared a short maintenance regimen with a standard (24 hours after birth) maintenance regimen. It is uncertain whether the duration of the maintenance regimen has an effect on recurrence of convulsions, severe morbidity, or side effects such as nausea and respiratory failure. A short maintenance regimen may reduce the risk of flushing when compared to a standard 24 hours maintenance regimen (risk ratio (RR) 0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.93; 1 trial, 120 women; low-certainty evidence). Many of our prespecified critical outcomes were not reported in the included trials. Prevention of eclampsia for women with pre-eclampsia (five comparisons) Two trials (462 women) compared loading dose alone with loading dose plus maintenance therapy. Low-certainty evidence suggests an uncertain effect with either regimen on the risk of eclampsia (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.61 to 6.54; 2 trials, 462 women) or perinatal death (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.36; 2 trials, 462 women). One small trial (17 women) compared an IV versus IM maintenance regimen for 24 hours. It is uncertain whether IV or IM maintenance regimen has an effect on eclampsia or stillbirth (very low-certainty evidence). Four trials (1713 women) compared short postpartum maintenance regimens with continuing for 24 hours after birth. Low-certainty evidence suggests there may be a wide range of benefit or harm between groups regarding eclampsia (RR 1.99, 95% CI 0.18 to 21.87; 4 trials, 1713 women). Low-certainty evidence suggests there may be little or no effect on severe morbidity (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.29; 2 trials, 1233 women) or side effects such as respiratory depression (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.61; 2 trials, 1424 women). Three trials (185 women) compared a higher-dose maintenance regimen versus a lower-dose maintenance regimen. It is uncertain whether either regimen has an effect on eclampsia (very low-certainty evidence). Low-certainty evidence suggests that a higher-dose maintenance regimen has little or no effect on side effects when compared to a lower-dose regimen (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.01; 1 trial 62 women). One trial (200 women) compared a maintenance regimen by continuous infusion versus a serial IV bolus regimen. It is uncertain whether the duration of the maintenance regimen has an effect on eclampsia, side effects, perinatal death, maternal death, or other neonatal morbidity (very low-certainty evidence). Many of our prespecified critical outcomes were not reported in the included trials. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Despite the number of trials evaluating various magnesium sulphate regimens for eclampsia prophylaxis and treatment, there is still no compelling evidence that one particular regimen is more effective than another. Well-designed randomised controlled trials are needed to answer this question.
Assuntos
Eclampsia , Morte Materna , Morte Perinatal , Pré-Eclâmpsia , Humanos , Gravidez , Recém-Nascido , Feminino , Pré-Eclâmpsia/tratamento farmacológico , Pré-Eclâmpsia/prevenção & controle , Sulfato de Magnésio/efeitos adversos , Eclampsia/tratamento farmacológico , Natimorto , ConvulsõesRESUMO
Eclampsia seizure is an always serious and potentially fatal obstetric condition. Safe delivery in women with pregnancies complicated by eclampsia seizures is still one of the greatest challenges in perinatal medicine. Pregnancy should be terminated (childbirth) in the safest and least traumatic way possible. Attempting vaginal delivery can take place only exceptionally, in the event of possibly quick completion of childbirth with a stable state of the mother and the fetus. However, immediate labor via cesarean section is most often recommended. It is essential to maintain left lateral patient positioning during cesarean section. Regional anesthesia can be used only in conscious patients who are free from coagulopathy and from HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count) syndrome to decrease the risk of aspiration and failed intubation attempts in preeclamptic or eclamptic women. For sudden, unexpected interventions, when a patient arrives at the hospital with an eclampsia seizure without lab results, general anesthesia can be the best option and should be performed by an experienced medical team of anesthesiologists, ready to perform difficult intubation. Magnesium sulfate is the drug that should be used first to stop eclamptic convulsions and prevent their recurrence. Intravenous antihypertensive drugs can stabilize elevated blood pressure (BP), preventing multiorgan failure and recurrent eclampsia seizure, and thus the prevention of maternal death. This article aims to review the management of seizures during pregnancy in women with eclampsia to ensure safe delivery.
Assuntos
Eclampsia , Síndrome HELLP , Pré-Eclâmpsia , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Cesárea , Eclampsia/tratamento farmacológico , Convulsões/tratamento farmacológico , Convulsões/etiologiaRESUMO
Eclampsia is the most serious pregnancy complication and one of the main causes of death of pregnant and delivering women. The mortality rate of young mothers is 5-20%, emphasizing the severity of this pregnancy-related disorder. Today many centers have only rare opportunities to see and deal with eclampsia cases; therefore, it is very important to bring this emergency medical condition to the attention of attending physicians. All patients with eclampsia, and after eclamptic seizures, should be treated in an intensive care unit. However, taking into account clinical realities, especially in developing countries, this is not always possible. It is necessary for all gynecologists-obstetricians to be fully prepared for eclampsia, although its occurrence is very rare. Drug treatment aims to stop eclampsia seizures and prevent reoccurrence of convulsions and complications. Magnesium sulphate is the drug of first choice used in treatment of eclampsia seizure, whereas treatment with the use of antihypertensive drugs and proper blood pressure control is one of the most important factors effectively reducing the risk of deaths or acute complications and poor pregnancy outcomes. The most urgent part of the treatment is the lifesaving procedure involving airways patency assessment, maintenance of breathing and blood circulation of the mother, securing an adequate oxygen level of the mother and thereby of the fetus, and prevention of injuries. This review aims to present an overview of the current prevalence, diagnosis, and management of eclampsia and the need for improved maternal care.
Assuntos
Eclampsia , Pré-Eclâmpsia , Complicações na Gravidez , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Eclampsia/tratamento farmacológico , Sulfato de Magnésio/uso terapêutico , Complicações na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado da Gravidez , Convulsões/tratamento farmacológico , Pré-Eclâmpsia/terapia , Pré-Eclâmpsia/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP) are leading causes of maternal mortality (with severe pre-eclampsia/eclampsia [SPE/EC] being causes of death). Magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) has proven to be the drug of choice for SPE/EC management. However, its availability and cost remain a drawback to its use in developing countries. This study aimed to compare Zuspan regimen with its 12-hour modification for SPE/EC management in two major hospitals in Abeokuta, Ogun state, South Western Nigeria. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial of non-inferior parallel design carried out at Federal Medical Centre and Sacred Heart Hospital, Abeokuta involving 148 consenting women who were randomized into two groups A and B. Both groups had 4 g loading dose of MgSO4, but the duration of maintenance was reduced to 12-hours in Group A (intervention) while Group B received the standard Zuspan regimen (control). Outcome measures were the occurrence/recurrence of convulsions (primary), maternal side effects and perinatal outcomes (secondary). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence/recurrence of seizures between the two groups for both SPE/EC. No signs of maternal toxicity were observed in both arm of the study. There were no statistically significant differences in the perinatal/neonatal death and Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min. However, there was a significant increase in the number of days on admission in the control group of those neonates delivered to mothers with eclampsia. CONCLUSION: A 12-hr modification of Zuspan regimen was found to be non-inferior to the standard Zuspan regimen in the management of SPE/EC.
Assuntos
Eclampsia , Morte Perinatal , Pré-Eclâmpsia , Gravidez , Recém-Nascido , Feminino , Humanos , Eclampsia/tratamento farmacológico , Sulfato de Magnésio/uso terapêutico , Convulsões/tratamento farmacológico , Convulsões/etiologia , HospitaisRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence, and to investigate risk factors, management, and perinatal outcomes of eclampsia in Italy. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective population-based cohort study enrolling all women admitted for eclampsia between November 2017 and March 2020. Incident cases were reported using electronic and anonymous data collection forms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence, risk factors, maternal and perinatal morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: 109 cases were included for an estimated incidence rate of 1.5 (95 % CI 1.2-1.8) per 10.000 births. Risk of developing eclampsia was associated with multiple pregnancies (RR = 4.51; p < 0.001) and with pregnancies achieved with assisted reproductive technologies (RR = 3.03; p < 0.001). Magnesium sulfate was used as prophylaxis in almost 30 % of women with preeclampsia, and to treat an eclamptic fit in 89 % of women. The time interval between the first fit and delivery was 62 min for antepartum and 10 min for intrapartum cases. Around one third of women developed at least one other major complication and one mother died. Severe morbidity affected 13.3 % of the newborns. Two fetal and one neonatal death were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Our data revealed low incidence of eclampsia in Italy and prompt administration of antihypertensive drugs and magnesium sulfate to prevent eclampsia and to treat the recurrence of seizures. However, the rate of severe maternal complications is still high: increasing the time interval between fit and delivery seems to be crucial to achieve an effective stabilization of maternal conditions and reduce maternal major complications.
Assuntos
Eclampsia , Pré-Eclâmpsia , Gravidez , Recém-Nascido , Feminino , Humanos , Eclampsia/tratamento farmacológico , Sulfato de Magnésio/uso terapêutico , Pré-Eclâmpsia/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos de CoortesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study compared the modulatory effect of two intravenous magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) regimens on the systemic inflammatory response in pregnant women diagnosed with imminent eclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: In a single-blind cross-sectional study, 33 women were allocated according to the Zuspan (n = 16) and Sibai (n = 17) MgSO4 regimens, and treated for 24 h. Blood samples were collected pre-administration of the loading dose, at 24 h of the maintenance dose of MgSO4, and at 48 h, when patients were without treatment. Plasma was used to determine interleukin (IL)-1 beta (IL-1ß), IL-6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), heat shock protein (Hsp70), and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) by ELISA. RESULTS: The treatment with the Zuspan's regimen didn't change plasma concentrations of TNF-α, IL-10, and Hsp70 in the three-time points studied. However, it decreased IL-1ß at 24 h and 48 h and IL-6 at 48 h, and increased HO-1 concentration at 48 h. On the other hand, compared to the pre-treatment period, Sibai's regimen induced a significant decrease in TNF-α, IL-1ß, IL-6, and Hsp70, while increased HO-1 levels both at 24 h and 48 h and, IL-10 concentration at 48 h. CONCLUSIONS: Sibai's regimen determined an early and efficient immunoregulatory effect on systemic inflammatory response in preeclampsia, suggesting that the maintenance dose of two grams of MgSO4 was better than one gram in the treatment of imminent eclampsia.
Assuntos
Eclampsia , Sulfato de Magnésio , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica , Estudos Transversais , Eclampsia/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Interleucina-10 , Interleucina-6 , Sulfato de Magnésio/uso terapêutico , Pré-Eclâmpsia/tratamento farmacológico , Gravidez , Gestantes , Método Simples-Cego , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/tratamento farmacológico , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfaRESUMO
To objective of this study was to compare neonatal magnesemia in the first 15 days of neonatal life between three groups: a control group not exposed to MgSO4, a neuroprotection group, and an eclampsia prevention group, and to explore its associations with child outcomes. A retrospective single-centre cohort study was performed in a tertiary care setting. Infants admitted at the neonatal intensive care unit born between 24 and 32 weeks' gestation, regardless of etiology of preterm birth, were included. The mean outcome measure was neonatal magnesemia (mmol/L). Linear mixed regression of neonatal magnesemia on exposure group and day of life was done. Generalised estimating equation models of child outcomes on neonatal magnesemia according to exposure group and day of life were made. The analyses showed that in neonatal magnesemia is significantly higher in the preeclampsia group compared to the control and neuroprotection groups. On the day of birth, this is irrespective of maternal magnesemia (preeclampsia vs control groups), and the maternal total dose or duration of MgSO4 administration (preeclampsia vs neuroprotection group). No differences were found in short-term composite outcome between the three groups. CONCLUSION: We found mean differences in neonatal magnesemia between children not exposed to MgSO4 antenatally, children exposed for fetal neuroprotection, and children exposed for maternal eclampsia prevention. A 4-g loading and 1-g/h maintenance doses, for fetal neuroprotection and eclampsia prevention, appear to be safe on the short term for the neonate. WHAT IS KNOWN: ⢠Magnesium sulphate is a valuable medicine in obstetrics. The main indications are prevention of eclampsia and fetal neuroprotection. The most used dosage is a 4- or 6-g loading dose and a 1- or 2-g per h maintenance dose. It reduces neuromotor disabilities in extreme-to-moderate preterm born children. WHAT IS NEW: ⢠Maternal concentrations are supraphysiological and the maternal total dose can be high. Concentrations in neonates appear to remain in safe ranges. A dosage of 4-g loading and 1 g/h seems safe for the preterm neonate on the short term.
Assuntos
Eclampsia , Pré-Eclâmpsia , Nascimento Prematuro , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Eclampsia/tratamento farmacológico , Eclampsia/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Magnésio , Sulfato de Magnésio/efeitos adversos , Neuroproteção , Pré-Eclâmpsia/tratamento farmacológico , Gravidez , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We compared the efficacy of a 12-h versus 24-h regimen of intramuscular magnesium sulfate in the management of eclampsia and preeclampsia. METHODS: This is an open-labeled parallel randomized controlled trial conducted in Accra, Ghana from November 2018 to November 2020. Participants were adult pregnant women admitted to the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH) with a diagnosis of antepartum, intrapartum, or postpartum eclampsia or preeclampsia with severe features, having received no more than a loading dose of magnesium sulfate prior to admission at KBTH. Participants in the standard 24-h group received a loading dose of magnesium sulfate 4 g intravenous and 10 g intramuscular (5 g in each buttock) followed by six, 5 g intramuscular maintenance doses over 24 h. Participants in the 12-h intervention group received the same loading dose followed by three, 5 g intramuscular maintenance doses over 12 h. The primary outcome was occurrence of seizure after completion of the assigned magnesium sulfate regimen. Secondary outcomes were magnesium sulfate toxicity, magnesium sulfate side effects, maternal outcomes (mode of delivery, duration of inpatient admission, duration of urethral catheterization), maternal complications (pulmonary edema, acute kidney injury, intensive care unit admission, death), and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Among 1176 total participants, we found no difference in occurrence of seizure after completion of the assigned regimen in the 24-h group (n = 5, 0.9%) versus the 12-h group (n = 2, 0.3%), P = 0.29; RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.08, 2.04), or in occurrence of seizure any time after enrollment (n = 9, 1.5% vs. n = 5, 0.9%, P = 0.28, RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.19-1.64). Participants in the 12-h group had a shorter duration of inpatient admission (9.4 ± 8.8 vs. 7.7 ± 6.5 days, P = 0.0009) and urethral catheterization (2.1 ± 1.0 vs. 1.9 ± 1.3 days, P < 0.0001). Rates of side effects from magnesium sulfate were lower in the 12-h group: pain at the injection site (94.8% (n = 548) vs. 91.5% (n = 540), P = 0.03), inflammation (62.2% (n = 358) vs. 40.0% (n = 237), P < 0.0001), and bleeding or bruising at the injection site (25.1% (n = 144) vs. 14.4% (n = 85), P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 24 h, 12 h of intramuscular magnesium sulfate showed similar rates of seizures, with fewer side effects and shorter inpatient admission. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospective registration was with Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR201811515303983): https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=4690.
Assuntos
Eclampsia , Pré-Eclâmpsia , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes , Eclampsia/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Gana , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Sulfato de Magnésio/efeitos adversos , Pré-Eclâmpsia/tratamento farmacológico , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Convulsões/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 has been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preeclampsia. Coronavirus disease 2019 and preeclampsia have overlapping clinical features and are therefore challenging to differentiate. Since pregnant women are not routinely tested for coronavirus disease 2019, it is prudent to test for it among patients presenting with preeclampsia or eclampsia. CASE PRESENTATION: A 23-year-old female, a Munda, gravida 1 para 0, at 36 weeks and 5 days of amenorrhea presented to Mal Super Specialty Hospital as a referral in a semiconscious state after a severe attack of tonic-clonic seizures. Detailed history from the husband was insignificant except for a persistent cough for the last 7 days. She had denied any visual changes, headaches, or vaginal discharge. Physical examination revealed tachycardia (150 beats per minute), elevated blood pressure (187/111 mmHg), tachypnea (36 breaths per minute), and oxygen saturation of 94% on room air. Routine coronavirus disease 2019 rapid test was positive, and urine dipstick was +3. Additional tests revealed leukocytosis and elevated liver enzymes. Chest radiograph revealed prominent interstitial markings, and a bedside transabdominal ultrasonography showed a live single intrauterine fetus in cephalic presentation with normal cardiac activity and movements. A diagnosis of a prime gravida with eclampsia and coronavirus disease 2019 was made. She was managed with intravenous labetalol; she had already received a loading dose of intravenous magnesium sulfate, and we administered two maintenance doses during monitoring. Within an hour of admission, she had a spontaneous rupture of the amniotic membranes, with meconium-stained liquor (grade 2), and the fetal heart rate (148 beats per minute) was reassuring. She had an uncomplicated vaginal delivery of a live male newborn. Shortly after delivery, she developed slight respiratory distress and significant fluid overload that was managed with furosemide. Coronavirus disease 2019 reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction test came back negative for the neonate and positive for the mother. She was shifted to the coronavirus disease 2019 treatment unit, and her contact with the child was limited. She was kept on a course of tablets ivermectin, zinc, vitamin C, montelukast, azithromycin, metronidazole, and injectable pantoprazole. The mother and child were discharged on day 15 after recovery with negative COVID nasopharyngeal swab. CONCLUSION: A diagnosis of preeclampsia or eclampsia should prompt testing for coronavirus disease 2019.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Eclampsia , Complicações na Gravidez , Adulto , Criança , Eclampsia/diagnóstico , Eclampsia/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Gravidez , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hypertensive disorders account for 14% of global maternal deaths. Magnesium sulphate (MgSO4 ) is recommended for prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia. However, MgSO4 remains underused, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). OBJECTIVE: This qualitative evidence synthesis explores perceptions and experiences of healthcare providers, administrators and policy-makers regarding factors affecting use of MgSO4 to prevent or treat pre-eclampsia/eclampsia. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Emcare, CINAHL, Global Health and Global Index Medicus, and grey literature for studies published between January 1995 and June 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: Primary qualitative and mixed-methods studies on factors affecting use of MgSO4 in healthcare settings, from the perspectives of healthcare providers, administrators and policy-makers, were eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We applied a thematic synthesis approach to analysis, using COM-B behaviour change theory to map factors affecting appropriate use of MgSO4 . MAIN RESULTS: We included 22 studies, predominantly from LMICs. Key themes included provider competence and confidence administering MgSO4 (attitudes and beliefs, complexities of administering, knowledge and experience), capability of health systems to ensure MgSO4 availability at point of use (availability, resourcing and pathways to care) and knowledge translation (dissemination of research and recommendations). Within each COM-B domain, we mapped facilitators and barriers to physical and psychological capability, physical and social opportunity, and how the interplay between these domains influences motivation. CONCLUSIONS: These findings can inform policy and guideline development and improve implementation of MgSO4 in clinical care. Such action is needed to ensure this life-saving treatment is widely available and appropriately used. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Global qualitative review identifies factors affecting underutilisation of MgSO4 for pre-eclampsia and eclampsia.
Assuntos
Eclampsia/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Sulfato de Magnésio/uso terapêutico , Pré-Eclâmpsia/tratamento farmacológico , Tocolíticos/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Eclampsia/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Pré-Eclâmpsia/prevenção & controle , Gravidez , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Ciência Translacional BiomédicaRESUMO
OBJETIVO: Reportar el caso de una gestante con miastenia grave (MG) más preeclampsia-eclampsia y crisis miasténica en el puerperio mediato, y realizar una revisión de la literatura sobre el manejo farmacológico. MÉTODO: Se presenta el caso de una mujer de 26 años con MG, primigesta de 36 semanas de gestación, quien cursó con eclampsia y recibió fenitoína por 24 horas. Tuvo parto espontáneo sin complicaciones y crisis miasténica al día 11 del puerperio asociada a infección de vías urinarias y sepsis. Se realiza revisión de la literatura en PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, LILACS y Scopus, empleando los términos "Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced", "Preeclampsia" y "Eclampsia", combinados con "Myasthenia Gravis", durante el periodo de publicación de 1960 a junio 2020, en inglés y español. RESULTADOS: Se encontraron 12 reportes de caso, dos con eclampsia y MG; el caso aquí reportado es el número 13. Ocho pacientes no recibieron medicamentos profilácticos de eclampsia y tres de ellas convulsionaron. En las que se usó sulfato de magnesio, todas cursaron con crisis miasténica. CONCLUSIONES: La evidencia actual en cuanto a la profilaxis y el tratamiento de la eclampsia y la MG corresponde a reportes de casos. El uso de sulfato de magnesio está contraindicado en pacientes con MG, por lo que se han utilizado fenitoína y levetiracetam.
OBJECTIVE: To report a case of pregnant women with myasthenia gravis (MG), plus preeclampsia-eclampsia and myasthenic crisis in the mediate puerperium; to conduct a literature review regarding its pharmacological management. METHOD: 26-year-old primigravida with 36 weeks of gestation and previous history of MG, who developed eclampsia and was treated with phenytoin for 24 hours, with later spontaneous delivery without any complications nor new seizures; and myasthenic crisis on day 11 of the puerperium associated with urinary tract infection and sepsis. A literature review was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, LILACS and Scopus, using the controlled vocabulary "Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced", "Preeclampsia" and "Eclampsia", combined with "Myasthenia Gravis", between 1960 and June 2020, in English and Spanish. RESULTS: 12 case reports were found, two of these with eclampsia and MG, the case reported here was number 13. In eight cases patients did not receive any prophylactic drugs for eclampsia and three of them had convulsions. In the cases where magnesium sulfate was used, all developed myasthenic crisis. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence regarding prophylactic management and treatment corresponds to case reports. The use of magnesium sulfate is contraindicated in patients with MG, therefore phenytoin and levetiracetam have been used.
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Adulto , Pré-Eclâmpsia/tratamento farmacológico , Eclampsia/tratamento farmacológico , Miastenia Gravis/complicações , Pré-Eclâmpsia/prevenção & controle , Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez , Eclampsia/prevenção & controle , Sulfato de Magnésio/uso terapêutico , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a rare neurological disorder with a complex physiopathology that is not fully understood. Suggested underlying mechanisms include failure of autoregulation, endothelial dysfunction, and oxidative stress. It is characterized by reversible multifocal constriction of the cerebral arteries, and can be triggered by many conditions, including, vasoactive medications (eg, triptans), cerebrovascular events, primary headache disorders, and metabolic causes (eg, hypercalcemia). RCVS can also be associated with pregnancy-related conditions, such as thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, eclampsia, and pre-eclampsia. Thunderclap headache is the most common clinical manifestation; however, other symptoms can result from complications of the disease, such as stroke, brain edema, and seizures. Several case reports have been published of an association between RCVS and eclampsia, but to the best of our knowledge, only 3 cases were successfully treated with intravenous milrinone and this is the only patient reported in Saudi Arabia. CASE REPORT We report a case of 25-year-old primigravida woman who presented with acute-onset headache, nausea, elevated blood pressure, and generalized tonic clonic seizure. She was diagnosed as having RCVS secondary to eclampsia based on clinical and radiological features. She was initially started on nimodipine, which is usually the first-line management of RCVS, as well as magnesium sulfate and levetiracetam; however, she only achieved full recovery after starting intravenous milrinone. CONCLUSIONS Milrinone is one of the emerging drugs for treatment of RCVS, and this case report delineates the potential of using the drug, especially in cases refractory to standard therapy.
Assuntos
Transtornos Cerebrovasculares , Eclampsia , Transtornos da Cefaleia Primários , Adulto , Eclampsia/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Transtornos da Cefaleia Primários/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos da Cefaleia Primários/etiologia , Humanos , Milrinona/uso terapêutico , Gravidez , VasoconstriçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are widespread and have long-standing implications for women's health. Historically, the management of "severe gestational hypertension," or the presence of severely elevated blood pressures without any other signs or symptoms of end-organ damage meeting the criteria for preeclampsia, has been unclear. The new American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines based on expert opinion recommend that severe gestational hypertension be treated similarly to preeclampsia with severe features, but data regarding outcomes for women with this diagnosis have been limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the maternal and perinatal sequelae of severe gestational hypertension with that of other types of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of women with hypertensive disease of pregnancy who delivered at a single tertiary care center between February and December 2018. Women with chronic hypertension; hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count syndrome; preexisting kidney, liver, rheumatologic, or hematologic disorders; or multifetal pregnancies were excluded. Women were categorized as having severe gestational hypertension if they had a sustained systolic blood pressure of >160 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure of >110 mm Hg without other criteria for preeclampsia. The primary comparison was between women with severe gestational hypertension and women with preeclampsia without severe features. Secondary comparisons included women with severe gestational hypertension vs women with other types of hypertensive disease of pregnancy. The primary outcome for this analysis was small-for-gestational-age birth. We also evaluated other maternal and neonatal morbidities including but not limited to pulmonary embolism, stroke, eclampsia, blood transfusion, mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission, death, 5-minute Apgar score of ≤4, umbilical cord pH, neonatal intensive care unit admission of >2 days, respiratory distress syndrome, and neonatal death. Bivariate analyses using chi-square tests and logistic regressions adjusting for race, ethnicity, age, body mass index, parity, and insurance status were performed to compare frequencies of outcomes for each type of hypertensive disease of pregnancy with those of severe gestational hypertension. RESULTS: Of 2076 women eligible for inclusion, 12.2% (n=254) had severe gestational hypertension and 379 (18.2%) had preeclampsia without severe features. Although there was no difference in the odds of small-for-gestational-age birth between women with severe gestational hypertension and women with preeclampsia without severe features (14.7% vs 9.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-1.21), the latter were significantly less likely to receive a prescription for antihypertensive medication at discharge (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.06-0.22) or to be readmitted postpartum (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.50). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the primary outcome, that is, rate of small-for-gestational-age birth, between women with severe gestational hypertension and women with preeclampsia without severe features. However, women with severe gestational hypertension had greater odds of other maternal and neonatal morbidities than women with preeclampsia without severe features or mild gestational hypertension. These findings support recent recommendations regarding the management of women with severe gestational hypertension.