RESUMO
Retention behaviour of biological peptides was investigated on a stationary phase bearing an embedded quaternary ammonium group in a C21 alkyl chain by both high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and capillary electrochromatography (CEC). In HPLC experiments, variation of acetonitrile (ACN) content in the mobile phase showed that peptides are mainly separated by RP mechanism. The weak or negative retention factors observed as compared to C18 silica stationary phase suggested the involvement of an electrostatic repulsion phenomenon in acidic conditions. Comparison of HPLC and CEC studies indicated that (i) ion-exclusion phenomenon is more pronounced in HPLC and (ii) higher ACN percentage in mobile phase induce for some peptides an increase of retention in CEC, pointing out the existence of mechanisms of retention other than partitioning mainly involved in chromatographic process. This comparative study demonstrated the critical role of electric field on peptide retention in CEC and supports the solvatation model of hydrolytic pillow proposed by Szumski and Buszewski for CEC using mixed mode stationary phase in CEC.
Assuntos
Eletrocromatografia Capilar/métodos , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão/métodos , Peptídeos/isolamento & purificação , Angiotensinogênio/isolamento & purificação , Eletrocromatografia Capilar/instrumentação , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão/instrumentação , Eledoisina/isolamento & purificação , Fator de Crescimento Epidérmico/isolamento & purificação , Gastrinas/isolamento & purificaçãoRESUMO
Hormone-like peptides are, almost by definition, not mutagenic. It was, therefore, unusual to find that some batches of peptides synthesized by azide coupling were mutagenic in the Ames test. One of these peptides, eledoisin, showed mutagenic activity particularly in Salmonella typhimurium TA 1535 without metabolic activation. This activity was independent of the peptide purity determined by HPLC and a dose response relationship was observed at concentrations over the solubility limit of the peptide in the assay medium. We therefore suggested that the mutagenic effect might be due to the presence of chemically undetectable, water-soluble impurities, which could be removed by counter-current distribution. If, however, the same final coupling was carried out by the mixed anhydride procedure, no mutagenic activity was observed. Consequently, we considered that the mutagenicity detected was due to traces of hydrazoic acid salts arising during azide formation in the coupling step. In fact only the product of the coupling reaction between the pivotal intermediates was mutagenic.