Continuous heart monitoring to evaluate treatment effects in pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of pulmonary hypertension (PH) has improved rapidly in recent decades. There is increasing evidence to support the role of early intervention and treatment in affecting clinical outcomes in PH. OBJECTIVES: To assess treatment effects before and after the escalation of specific PH treatments using continuous heart monitoring with a Reveal LINQ loop recorder. METHODS: Patients were compared before and after treatment escalation. Treatment escalation was defined as an additional pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) drug, pulmonary endarterectomy, percutaneous balloon angioplasty or bilateral lung transplantation. Specifically, changes in heart rate variability (HRV), heart rate (HR) and physical activity were assessed. RESULTS: In this prospective study, 41 patients (27 with PAH and 14 with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH)) were enrolled. Among them, 15 (36.6%) patients underwent PH treatment escalation. Prior to escalation, patients were monitored for a median of 100 (range: 68-100) days and after therapy escalation for a median duration of 165 (range: 89-308) days. In the escalation group, there was a significant increase in HRV, physical activity indexed by daytime HR and a significant decrease in nighttime HR assessed at baseline and after treatment escalation in both the PAH and CTEPH groups. This was paralleled by significant improvements in WHO functional class, 6-min walking distance and N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate an association between specific PH therapies and changes in HRV, HR nighttime and physical activity. This indicates the potential of continuous monitoring in the evaluation of treatment effects in PH.

Atrial Arrhythmias Following Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy: A Comprehensive Review Of Current Literature.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) presents as a progressive vascular condition arising from previous episodes of acute pulmonary embolism, contributing to the development of pulmonary hypertension (PH). Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) is the gold-standard surgical treatment for CTEPH; however, it may be associated with postoperative sequelae, including atrial arrhythmias (AAs). This comprehensive literature review explores the potential mechanisms for PTE-induced AAs with emphasis on the role of PH-related atrial remodelling and the predisposing factors. The identified preoperative predictors for AAs include advanced age, male gender, elevated resting heart rate, previous AAs, and baseline elevated right atrial pressure. Furthermore, we explore the available data on the association between post-PTE pericardial effusions and the development of AAs. Lastly, we briefly discuss the emerging role of radiomic analysis of epicardial adipose tissue as an imaging biomarker for predicting AAs.

[Consensus on the procedure of balloon pulmonary angioplasty for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension].

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is classified as group IV pulmonary hypertension, characterized by thrombotic occlusion of the pulmonary arteries leading to vascular stenosis or obstruction, progressive increase in pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary arterial pressure, and eventual right heart failure. Unlike other types of pulmonary hypertension, the prognosis of CTEPH can be significantly improved by surgery, vascular intervention, and/or targeted drug therapy. Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the preferred treatment of choice for CTEPH. However, PEA is an invasive procedure with high operative risks, and is currently only performed in a few centers in China. Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is an emerging interventional technique for CTEPH, serving as an alternative for patients who are ineligible for PEA or with residual pulmonary hypertension after PEA. BPA is gaining traction in China, but its widespread adoption is limited due to its complexity, operator skills, and equipment requirements, a lack of standard operating procedures and technical guidance, which limit the further improvement and development of BPA in China. To address this, a multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened to develop the Consensus on the Procedure of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty for the Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension, which fomulates guidelines on BPA procedural qualification, perioperative management, procedural planning, technical approach, and complication prevention, with the aim of providing recommendations and clinical guidance for BPA treatment in CTEPH and standardizing its clinical application in this setting. Summary of recommendations: Recommendation 1: It is recommended that physicians who specialize in pulmonary vascular diseases take the lead in formulating the diagnostic and treatment plans for CTEPH, using a multidisciplinary approach.Recommendation 2: Training in BPA technique is critical; novice operators should undergo standardized operative training with at least 50 procedures under the guidance of experienced physicians before embarking on independent BPA procedures.Recommendation 3: BPA requires catheterization labs, angiography systems, standard vascular interventional devices and consumables, drugs, and emergency equipment.Recommendation 4: Patient selection for BPA should consider cardiac and pulmonary function, coagulation status, and comorbid conditions to determine indications and contraindications, thereby optimizing the timing of the procedure and improving safety.Recommendation 5: In experienced centers, patients deemed likely to benefit from early BPA, based on clinical and imaging features of CTEPH and without elevated D-dimer levels, could bypass standard 3-month anticoagulation therapy.Recommendation 6: BPA is a complex interventional treatment that requires thorough pre-operative assessment and preparation.Recommendation 7: The use of perioperative anticoagulants in BPA requires a comprehensive risk assessment of intraoperative bleeding by the operator for individualized decision making.Recommendation 8: A variety of venous access routes are available for BPA; unless contraindicated, the right femoral vein is usually preferred because of its procedural convenience and reduced radiation exposure.Recommendation 9: For the different types of vascular lesion in CTEPH, treatment of ring-like stenoses, web-like lesions, and subtotal occlusions should be prioritized before addressing complete occlusions and tortuous lesions, in order to reduce complications and improve procedural safety.Recommendation 10: A targeted, incremental balloon dilatation strategy based on vascular lesions is recommended for BPA.Recommendation 11: Intravascular pulmonary artery imaging technologies, such as OCT and IVUS can assist in accurate vessel sizing and confirmation of wire placement in the true vascular lumen. Pressure wires can be used to objectively assess the efficacy of dilatation during BPA.Recommendation 12: Endpoints for BPA treatment should be individually assessed, taking into account improvements in clinical symptoms, hemodynamics, exercise tolerance, and quality of life.Recommendation 13: Post-BPA routine monitoring of vital signs is essential; anticoagulation therapy should be initiated promptly post-procedure in the absence of complications. In cases of intraoperative hemoptysis, postoperative anticoagulation regimen adjustments should be adjusted according to the bleeding severity.Recommendation 14: If reperfusion pulmonary edema occurs during or after BPA, ensure adequate oxygenation, diuresis, and consider non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation if necessary, while severe cases may require early mechanical ventilation assistance or ECMO.Recommendation 15: In cases of intraoperative hemoptysis, temporary balloon occlusion to stop bleeding is recommended, along with protamine to neutralize heparin. Persistent bleeding may warrant the use of gelatin sponges, coil embolization, or covered stent implantation.Recommendation 16: For contrast imaging during BPA, non-ionic, low or iso-osmolar contrast agents are recommended, with hydration status determined by the patient's clinical condition, cardiac and renal function, and intraoperative contrast volume used.

[Pulmonary artery stenting in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a report of 2 cases].

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a pulmonary vascular disease characterized by an insidious onset, progressive deterioration, and poor prognosis. It is distinguished by the thrombotic organization within the pulmonary arteries, leading to vascular stenosis or occlusion. This results in a progressive increase in pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary arterial pressure, ultimately leading to right heart failure. In recent years, balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has emerged as an effective treatment option for patients ineligible for pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). However, the use of stents in patients with suboptimal balloon dilation remains controversial. This article describes two cases of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) in which balloon angioplasty yielded unsatisfactory results, subsequently leading to stent placement. Following stent implantation, there was improved blood flow, significant reduction in pulmonary arterial pressure, and notable alleviation of patient symptoms. One-year follow-up showed no recurrence of stenosis within the stent, suggesting potential guidance for the use of pulmonary artery stenting as a treatment modality for CTEPH. This report provided new insights into the therapeutic approach for CTEPH.

Status and Future Directions for Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease With and Without Pulmonary Hypertension: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty continues to gain traction as a treatment option for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease with and without pulmonary hypertension. Recent European Society of Cardiology guidelines on pulmonary hypertension now give balloon pulmonary angioplasty a Class 1 recommendation for inoperable and residual chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Not surprisingly, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension centers are rapidly initiating balloon pulmonary angioplasty programs. However, we need a comprehensive, expert consensus document outlining critical concepts, including identifying necessary personnel and expertise, criteria for patient selection, and a standardized approach to preprocedural planning and establishing criteria for evaluating procedural efficacy and safety. Given this lack of standards, the balloon pulmonary angioplasty skill set is learned through peer-to-peer contact and training. This document is a state-of-the-art, comprehensive statement from key thought leaders to address this gap in the current clinical practice of balloon pulmonary angioplasty. We summarize the current status of the procedure and provide a consensus opinion on the role of balloon pulmonary angioplasty in the overall care of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease with and without pulmonary hypertension. We also identify knowledge gaps, provide guidance for new centers interested in initiating balloon pulmonary angioplasty programs, and highlight future directions and research needs for this emerging therapy.

Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension.

This JAMA Insights discusses the symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Angiogenesis in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Janus-Faced Player?

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare form of pulmonary hypertension characterized by the presence of organized thrombi that obstruct pulmonary arteries, ultimately leading to right heart failure and death. Among others, impaired angiogenesis and inflammatory thrombosis have been shown to contribute to the progression of CTEPH. In this review, we summarize the 2-faced nature of angiogenesis in both thrombus formation and resolution in the context of CTEPH and highlight the dual role of angiogenesis and neovascularization in resolving venous thrombi. Furthermore, we discuss relevant in vitro and in vivo models that support the benefits or drawbacks of angiogenesis in CTEPH progression. We discuss the key pathways involved in modulating angiogenesis, particularly the underexplored role of TGFß (transforming growth factor-beta) signaling in driving fibrosis as an integral element of CTEPH pathogenesis. We finally explore innovative treatment strategies that target angiogenic pathways. These strategies have the potential to pioneer preventive, inventive, or alternative therapeutic options for patients with CTEPH who may not qualify for surgical interventions. Moreover, they could be used synergistically with established treatments such as pulmonary endarterectomy or balloon pulmonary angioplasty. In summary, this review emphasizes the crucial role of angiogenesis in the development of in fibrothrombotic tissue, a major pathological characteristic of CTEPH.

Using Isolated Femoral Bifurcation Endarterectomy or Combined with Bypass Surgery for Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients suffering from chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and tissue loss treated with primary isolated femoral bifurcation endarterectomy (FBE) or with FBE combined with bypass surgery. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was performed in a tertiary university-based care centre. Between January 2008 and December 2019, a prospectively collected database of patients suffering from CLTI and tissue loss and undergoing either primary FBE (group A) or FBE in combination with bypass surgery (group B) was analysed. Study endpoints were ulcer healing, primary and secondary patency rate, limb salvage, and survival. Results: In total, FBE was performed in 73 patients and FBE with bypass in 60 patients. Between both groups, there were no significant differences regarding demographic data or the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) grade III and IV of femoropopliteal lesions. After 3 years, ulcer healing could be achieved in 72% of FBE and in 75% of FBE with bypass patients. The primary patency rate was 95% and 91% for FBE and 83% and 80% for FBE with bypass after one and three years, respectively. The 3-year limb-salvage rate was 78% for FBE and 84% for FBE with bypass. The secondary patency rate after one and three years was 99% and 97% for FBE and 93% and 88% for FBE with bypass. Conclusions: FBE and FBE with bypass are equally effective for ulcer healing in cases of combined CFA and superficial femoral artery lesions. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding primary and secondary patency rates, limb salvage rates and ulcer healing. Isolated FBE could be an alternative strategy in patients with higher operative risk.

Does pulmonary endarterectomy improve the clinical conditions of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease without pulmonary hypertension?

To verify whether the new hemodynamic definition of pulmonary hypertension (PH) has any implication in treatment of Chronic Thrombo-Embolic Pulmonary Disease (CTEPD) patients without PH, we retrospectively analysed the clinical and functional changes determined by pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) in 63 CTEPD patients without PH who underwent surgery at our center, comparing those in whom the hemodynamic diagnosis of PH met recent guideline recommendations versus those in whom the diagnosis only met previous hemodynamic thresholds. The results show that the vast majority of CTEPD patients without PH operated at our center would now be defined as chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) patients. PEA did not result in any improvement in exercise capacity nor in right ventricular function or lung function test in patients with mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≤ 20 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) ≤ 2 WU; on the contrary, hemodynamic parameters, exercise capacity, right ventricular function and lung function significantly improved in patients with mPAP between 21 and 24 mm Hg.

The long-term outcome of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Pulmonary endarterectomy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty.

BACKGROUND: The long-term outcome on patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) has not been ideal after standard medical treatment. However, good outcome for patients with CTEPH after interventions such as pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) and balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has been reported recently. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of PEA or BPA on long-term outcomes for CTEPH patients in Han-Chinese population. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective case-control study. Patients with CTEPH were enrolled between January, 2018 and March, 2020. They were divided into two groups, including intervention (PEA or BPA) and conservative groups. The followed-up period was 26 months after treatment. The endpoints were all-cause mortality and CTEPH mortality. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients were enrolled and assigned to receive PEA/BPA (N = 73), or conservative therapy (N = 56). Overall, the 26-month survival rate of all-cause mortality was significantly higher in intervention group compared to that in conservative group (95.89% vs 80.36%; log-rank p = 0.0164). The similar trend was observed in the 26-month survival rate of CTEPH mortality (97.26% vs 85.71%; log-rank p = 0.0355). Regarding Cox proportional-hazard regression analysis, the hazard ratios (HRs) on patients with CTEPH receiving intervention in the outcome of all-cause mortality and CTEPH mortality were statistically significant (HR = 0.07 and p = 0.0141 in all-cause mortality; HR = 0.11 and p = 0.0461 in CTEPH mortality). CONCLUSION: This multicenter prospective case-control study demonstrated that intervention such as PEA and BPA increased the long-term survival rate for patient with CTEPH significantly. Intervention was an independent factor in long-term outcome for patients with CTEPH, including all-cause mortality and CTEPH mortality.

Transcervical Vertebral Artery Origin Endarterectomy for Vertebrobasilar Insufficiency.

Vertebral artery (VA) stenosis is a cause of vertebrobasilar insufficiency (VBI) and disabling posterior circulation stroke,1 accounting for up to 30% of all strokes.2 Although the natural history of VBI is not as well delineated as that of carotid stenosis, strokes in the basilar circulation can be more disabling than their anterior circulation counterparts. Stenosis exceeding 30% at the origin of the vertebral artery is associated with increased risk of stroke.3 The authors present a case of a female patient with significant peripheral vascular disease who presented with concerns for VBI. The patient was on antiplatelet and anticoagulative medications and a statin at the time of her presentation. Angiography demonstrated bilateral vertebral artery origin stenosis. The left VA was diminutive and arose directly from the arch (Video 1). The right VA demonstrated critical stenosis at its origin. Attempts at endovascular access of the right VA for placement of a balloon-mounted stent were unsuccessful. The patient underwent a transcervical approach for endarterectomy of the VA origin. The VA can be readily accessed using a small supraclavicular incision to isolate the V1 segment of the vessel. The procedure was performed with the patient heparinized and on antiplatelet medications. Alternatives to this strategy include patch grafting in addition to the endarterectomy or use of a short vein graft to bypass the stenosis of the VA beyond the stenotic segment.

Early tirofiban versus heparin for bridging dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing coronary endarterectomy combined with coronary artery bypass grafting: a multicenter randomized controlled trial protocol (the THACE-CABG trial).

BACKGROUND: For complete revascularization, patients with diffuse coronary artery disease should have a coronary endarterectomy and a coronary artery bypass graft (CE-CABG). Sadly, CE can lead to a lack of endothelium, which raises the risk of thrombotic events. Even though daily dual antiplatelet therapies (DAPT) have been shown to reduce thrombotic events, the risk of perioperative thrombotic events is high during the high-risk period after CE-CABG, and there is no consistent protocol to bridge DAPT. This trial aims to compare safety and efficacy between tirofiban and heparin as DAPT bridging strategies after CE-CABG. METHODS: In phase I, 266 patients undergoing CE-CABG will be randomly assigned to tirofiban and heparin treatment groups to compare the two treatments in terms of the primary safety endpoint, chest tube drainage in the first 24 h. If the phase I trial shows tirofiban non-inferiority, phase II will commence, in which an additional 464 patients will be randomly assigned. All 730 patients will be studied to compare major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) between the groups in the first 30 days after surgery. DISCUSSION: Given the possible benefits of tirofiban administration after CE-CABG, this trial has the potential to advance the field of adult coronary heart surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2200055697. Registered 6 January 2022. https://www.chictr.org.cn/com/25/showproj.aspx?proj=149451 . Current version: 20,220,620.

Coronary endarterectomy combined with coronary artery bypass grafting might decrease graft patency: A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the graft patency after coronary endarterectomy (CE) combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study aimed to investigate the graft patency after CABG + CE. METHODS: Eligible patients hospitalized at our center during September 2008 and July 2022 with complete follow-up coronary angiographic data available were retrospectively enrolled. The primary end point was the follow-up graft patency of CE targets. Logistic regression was performed to explore the potential predictors of the CE-targeted graft failure. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients (age: 59.4 ± 9.3 years, male: 75.6%) were enrolled, and 560 grafts were anastomosed. CE was performed on 166 sites, including LAD (36.1%), right coronary artery (RCA, 48.2%), left circumflex artery (9.6%), and diagonal branches (6.0%). Postoperative myocardial infarction was observed in 7 (4.4%) of the patients. During a median follow-up of 12.1 months, the CE-targeted graft patency was 69.9%. The CE-targeted graft patency rate was much higher among the LAD-CE patients than the non-LAD-CE patients (80.0% vs. 64.2%, P = 0.032) but lower than non-endarterectomized LAD (80.0% vs. 92.9%, P = 0.013). No difference was observed regarding the graft patency between off-pump and on-pump surgery (P = 0.585). In the logistic regression, RCA-CE was associated with an increased risk of graft failure even after multiple adjustments (odds ratio: 2.35, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-5.28, P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: CABG + CE might be associated with decreased graft patency, especially in those who received RCA-CE, irrespective of surgical technique or antiplatelet/anticoagulation regimen. A multi-center prospective, possibly randomized study with a larger sample size is warranted.

Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy in hospitalized versus elective patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize outcomes in patients undergoing pulmonary thromboendarterectomy electively versus after acute presentation. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent pulmonary thromboendarterectomy from October 2015 to April 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on elective surgery or surgery during the same hospitalization as their presentation. RESULTS: In total, 69 patients were included: 45 in the hospitalized group and 24 in the elective group. Patients in the hospitalized group were less likely to have chronic lung disease, history of pulmonary embolism and hypertension, be on anticoagulation and medication for pulmonary hypertension, and present with >1 month of respiratory symptoms. They were more likely to have worse preoperative right ventricular function. Among other demographics, risk factors for venous thromboembolism were similar between both groups. Thirteen patients in the hospitalized group required preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. There was no difference in disease classification and operative, cardiopulmonary bypass, and hypothermic circulatory arrest durations between both groups. Postoperative complications were similar between both groups, except for greater frequency of deep vein thrombosis in the hospitalized group (26.7% vs 4.2%, P = .03). In-hospital and intensive care unit length of stay were similar between both groups. Overall, in-hospital mortality was 4.3% and was similar between both groups; P = .28. CONCLUSIONS: Our series shows that pulmonary thromboendarterectomy can be safely performed in patients presenting acutely, with comparable postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality to an elective setting. Such patients present with worse right ventricular function, sometimes requiring temporary mechanical support.

Perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for pulmonary endarterectomy: A 17-year experience from the UK national cohort.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the guideline-recommended treatment for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). However, some patients develop severe cardiopulmonary compromise before surgery, intraoperatively, or early postoperatively. This may result from advanced CTEPH, reperfusion pulmonary edema, massive endobronchial bleeding, or right ventricular (RV) failure secondary to residual pulmonary hypertension. Conventional cardiorespiratory support is ineffective when these complications are severe. Since 2005, we used extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a rescue therapy for this group. We review our experience with ECMO support in these patients. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of patients who received perioperative ECMO for PEA from a single national center from August 2005 to July 2022. Data were prospectively collected. RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients (4.7%) had extreme cardiorespiratory compromise requiring perioperative ECMO. Nine were established on ECMO before PEA. Of those who received ECMO postoperatively, 39 were for refractory reperfusion lung injury, 20 for RV failure, 31 for endobronchial bleeding, and the remaining 11 were for "other" reasons, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation following late tamponade and aspiration pneumonitis. Sixty-two (56.4%) were successfully weaned from ECMO. Fifty-seven patients left the hospital alive, giving a salvage rate of 51.8%. Distal disease (Jamieson Type III) and significant residual pulmonary hypertension were also predictors of mortality on ECMO support. Overall, 5- and 10-year survival in patients who were discharged alive following ECMO support was 73.9% (SE: 6.1%) and 58.2% (SE: 9.5%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative ECMO support has an appropriate role as rescue therapy for this group. Over 50% survived to hospital discharge. These patients had satisfactory longer-term survival.

How Would I Treat My Own Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension in the Perioperative Period?

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) results from an incomplete resolution of acute pulmonary embolism, leading to occlusive organized thrombi, vascular remodeling, and associated microvasculopathy with pulmonary hypertension (PH). A definitive CTEPH diagnosis requires PH confirmation by right-heart catheterization and evidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease on imaging studies. Surgical removal of the organized fibrotic material by pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest represents the treatment of choice. One-third of patients with CTEPH are not deemed suitable for surgical treatment, and medical therapy or interventional balloon pulmonary angioplasty presents alternative treatment options. Pulmonary endarterectomy in patients with technically operable disease significantly improves symptoms, functional capacity, hemodynamics, and quality of life. Perioperative mortality is <2.5% in expert centers where a CTEPH multidisciplinary team optimizes patient selection and ensures the best preoperative optimization according to individualized risk assessment. Despite adequate pulmonary artery clearance, patients might be prone to perioperative complications, such as right ventricular maladaptation, airway bleeding, or pulmonary reperfusion injury. These complications can be treated conventionally, but extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has been included in their management recently. Patients with residual PH post-PEA should be considered for medical or percutaneous interventional therapy.

Long-term effects of pulmonary endarterectomy on pulmonary hemodynamics, cardiac function, and exercise capacity in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Long-term changes in exercise capacity and cardiopulmonary hemodynamics after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) have been poorly described. METHODS: We analyzed the data from 2 prospective surgical CTEPH cohorts in Hammersmith Hospital, London, and Amsterdam UMC. A structured multimodal follow-up was adopted, consisting of right heart catheterization, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing before and after PEA. Preoperative predictors of residual pulmonary hypertension (PH; mean pulmonary artery pressure >20 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance ≥2 WU) and long-term exercise intolerance (VO2max <80%) at 18 months were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients (61 from London and 57 from Amsterdam) were included in the analysis. Both cohorts displayed a significant improvement of pulmonary hemodynamics, right ventricular (RV) function, and exercise capacity 6 months after PEA. Between 6 and 18 months after PEA, there were no further improvements in hemodynamics and RV function, but the proportion of patients with impaired exercise capacity was high and slightly increased over time (52%-59% from 6 to 18 months). Long-term exercise intolerance was common and associated with preoperative diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), preoperative mixed venous oxygen saturation, and postoperative PH and right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF). Clinically significant RV deterioration (RVEF decline >3%; 5 [9%] of 57 patients) and recurrent PH (5 [14%] of 36 patients) rarely occurred beyond 6 months after PEA. Age and preoperative DLCO were predictors of residual PH post-PEA. CONCLUSIONS: Restoration in exercise tolerance, cardiopulmonary hemodynamics, and RV function occurs within 6 months. No substantial changes occurred between 6 and 18 months after PEA in the Amsterdam cohort. Nevertheless, long-term exercise intolerance is common and associated with postoperative RV function.

Early Outcomes of Interwoven Nitinol Wire Stent Placement versus Endarterectomy for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Disease of the Common Femoral Artery.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of common femoral artery (CFA) atherosclerotic disease treated with either surgical endarterectomy or an interwoven nitinol wire stent system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients with chronic, de novo atherosclerotic CFA disease treated with surgical endarterectomy (CFAE) or stent placement between July 2019 and March 2022. Outcome measures assessed up to 12 months after procedure included clinical improvement, primary restenosis, target vessel revascularization (TVR), major adverse limb events (MALEs), and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Thirty-nine stents were deployed in 33 patients, and 56 CFAEs were performed in 55 patients. No differences were noted in the rate of primary patency (95.5% vs 94.4%, P = .618), TVR (2.9% vs 1.8%, P = .777), MALE (5.1% vs 5.4%, P = .949), and all-cause mortality (14.1% vs 3.6%, P = .076) between the stent and CFAE groups up to 12 months after procedure. There was greater improvement in median clinical severity in the stent group than in the CFAE group (Rutherford score change of 3.0 vs 1.5, P = .013). The median length of stay was less for the stent group (3 vs 7 days, P = .002), and there was a lower likelihood of severe or disabling adverse events in the stent group (0 vs 9 cases, P = .010). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with an interwoven nitinol wire stent had patency rates comparable to those treated with CFAE while having a lower incidence of severe adverse events and a shorter length of hospital stay than those who underwent CFAE.

Aortic endarterectomy in patients with severe multivessel paravisceral and aortoiliac occlusive disease.

OBJECTIVE: Aortic endarterectomy (AE), once a treatment of choice for aortoiliac occlusive disease, is now rarely performed in favor of endovascular procedures or open aortobifemoral bypass. However, in select patients with paravisceral or aortoiliac occlusive disease, AE remains a viable alternative for revascularization, either as a primary procedure or after prior interventions have failed. Here, we evaluated outcomes for an extended series of patients undergoing paravisceral or aortoiliac endarterectomy, demonstrating that these procedures can be an excellent alternative with acceptable morbidity and mortality in properly selected patients. METHODS: A single institution retrospective review of 20 patients who underwent AE from 2017 to 2023 was performed. RESULTS: Five patients (25%) underwent paravisceral endarterectomy and 15 (75%) underwent aortoiliac endarterectomy. There were no perioperative mortalities. One paravisceral patient died 3 months postoperatively from complications of pneumonia. Three patients in the paravisceral group required reinterventions; one acutely due to thrombosis of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) requiring extension of the endarterectomy and patch angioplasty on postoperative day 0, one due to stenosis at the distal edge of the endarterectomy 1 month postoperatively, successfully treated with SMA stenting, and one at 10-month follow-up due to SMA stenosis at the distal aspect of the endarterectomy, also successfully treated with SMA stenting. With these reinterventions, the 1-year primary patency in the paravisceral group was 40%, primary-assisted patency was 80%, and secondary patency was 100%. In the aortoiliac group, 1-year primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency were 91%, 91%, and 100%, respectively. One patient developed iliac thrombosis 10 days postoperatively owing to an intimal flap distal to the endarterectomy site. She and one other patient, a young man with an undefined hypercoagulable disorder, ultimately required neoaortoiliac reconstructions at 18 and 32 months postoperatively, respectively (the latter in the setting of stopping anticoagulation). The remaining 13 patients experienced no complications. All patients had rapid resolution of clinical symptoms, and median postoperative ankle-brachial indexes of 1.06 on the right and 1.00 on the left, representing a median improvement from preoperative ankle-brachial indexes of +0.59 on the right and +0.56 on the left (P < .01 and P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: In this series of 20 patients undergoing paravisceral and infrarenal aortoiliac endarterectomy, AE was associated with no perioperative mortality, relatively low and manageable morbidity, and excellent clinical outcomes in patients with both paravisceral and aortoiliac occlusive disease. SMA-related early reintervention was not uncommon in the paravisceral group, and attention should be given particularly to the distal endarterectomy site. AE remains a viable treatment for severe multivessel paravisceral or aortoiliac occlusive disease isolated to the aorta and common iliac arteries in select patients.