Hereditary epidermolysis bullosa: clinical-epidemiological profile of 278 patients at a tertiary hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of rare hereditary diseases, characterized by fragility of the skin and mucous membranes. Epidemiological data on EB in Brazil are scarce. OBJECTIVES: To describe epidemiological aspects of patients with EB diagnosed in the Dermatology Department of a tertiary hospital, from 2000 to 2022. METHODS: An observational and retrospective study was conducted through the analysis of medical records. The evaluated data included clinical form, sex, family history, consanguinity, age at diagnosis, current age, time of follow-up, comorbidities, histopathology and immunomapping, presence of EB nevi and squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), cause of and age at death. RESULTS: Of 309 patients with hereditary EB, 278 were included. The most common type was dystrophic EB (DEB), with 73% (28.4% dominant DEB, 31.7% recessive DEB and 12.9% pruriginous DEB). Other types were junctional EB with 9.4%, EB simplex with 16.5% and Kindler EB with 1.1%. Women accounted for 53% and men for 47% of cases. Family history was found in 35% and consanguinity in 11%. The mean age at diagnosis was 10.8 years and the current age was 26 years. The mean time of follow-up was nine years. Esophageal stenosis affected 14%, dental alterations affected 36%, malnutrition 13% and anemia 29%. During diagnostic investigation, 72.6% underwent histopathological examination and 92% underwent immunomapping. EB nevi were identified in 17%. Nine patients had SCC. Eleven patients died. STUDY LIMITATIONS: Insufficient data included to medical records, loss to follow-up, and unavailability of genetic testing. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, dystrophic EB predominated and the need for multidisciplinary care for comorbidities and complications was highlighted.

Oral health status in patients with inherited epidermolysis bullosa: a comparative multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare genetic mucocutaneous disorder characterized by epithelial fragility leading to blister formation on skin and mucous membranes with even minor mechanical trauma. Most EB oral health publications give fragmented information, focusing on only one oral health aspect or one EB type. The aim of this study was to expand the knowledge of the overall oral health status of individuals with dystrophic, junctional, and simplex EB. METHOD AND MATERIALS: A comparative multicenter study, including a control group, and based on questionnaires and clinical examinations, was undertaken in three EB expert centers. RESULTS: Most EB (90.2%) participants brushed their teeth at least once a day despite the pain. The prevalence of enamel defects and caries experience did not differ between the 42 EB participants and the 42 age-/sex-matched healthy controls. Gingival inflammation unrelated to dental plaque accumulation was found in EB participants. Blisters, erythema, and erosion/ulceration mainly involved gingiva, buccal mucosa, lips, and palate, with different topographic patterns according to EB type. EB patients whatever the age showed a similar lesion distribution. Simplex and dystrophic EB patients under 12 years old displayed higher lesion severity than junctional EB ones. Only dystrophic type exhibited microstomia and ankyloglossia. CONCLUSION: Oral health status seemed to benefit from a close collaboration between dental practitioner and dermatologist, and from regular dental examination, starting at a young age and with a focus on prevention. The new appreciation of oral health involvement highlighted by this study is essential for EB patients care, regarding comorbidities and quality of life.

Prevalence of delayed puberty and low bone density in patients with epidermolysis bullosa: Insight from a large single center's experience.

BACKGROUND: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of rare genetic skin conditions that result in skin fragility. EB can be quite severe with chronic inflammation and malnutrition impairing growth and pubertal development. These factors have potential consequences for skeletal health. We aimed to determine the prevalence of delayed puberty and low bone mineral density (BMD) for age in children and young adults with EB. METHODS: Electronic medical records (EMR) of patients with confirmed EB <30 years of age at time of initial encounter at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center between January 1, 2010 and September 30, 2020 were reviewed. Natural language processing software was used to categorize pubertal status of patients with EB as early, normal or delayed. BMD was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and categorized as low if height adjusted Z-score was <-2.0 using age, sex and race specific reference ranges. RESULTS: 29% of individuals with EB had low BMD with most cases occurring prior to 10 years of age. Of patients who reached adolescence, 23% failed to develop any signs of puberty in the normal range (before age 13 in females or 14 in males) and BMD Z-scores further declined in these individuals. CONCLUSION: Delayed puberty is an under-recognized comorbidity of individuals with EB, especially in those with recessive dystrophic EB, and can have a significant impact on BMD.

Epidemiology of inherited epidermolysis bullosa in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare genetic disorder manifesting with skin and mucosal membrane blistering in different degrees of severity. OBJECTIVE: Epidemiological data from different countries have been published, but none are available from Germany. METHODS: In this population-based cross-sectional study, people living with EB in Germany were identified using the following sources: academic hospitals, diagnostic laboratories and patient organization. RESULTS: Our study indicates an overall EB incidence of 45 per million live births in Germany. With 14.23 per million live births for junctional EB, the incidence is higher than in other countries, possibly reflecting the availability of early molecular genetic diagnostics in severely affected neonates. Dystrophic EB was assessed at 15.58 cases per million live births. The relatively low incidence found for EB simplex, 14.93 per million live births, could be explained by late or missed diagnosis, but also by 33% of cases remaining not otherwise specified. Using log-linear models, we estimated a prevalence of 54 per million for all EB types, 2.44 for junctional EB, 12.16 for dystrophic EB and 28.44 per million for EB simplex. These figures are comparable to previously reported data from other countries. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, there are at least 2000 patients with EB in the German population. These results should support national policies and pharmaceutical companies in decision-making, allow more precise planning of drug development and clinical trials, and aid patient advocacy groups in their effort to improve quality of life of people with this orphan disease.

Multidisciplinary care for patients with epidermolysis bullosa from birth to adolescence: experience of one Italian reference center.

BACKGROUND: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a disabling and chronic genodermatosis characterized by mucocutaneous fragility with blister formation after minimal trauma. Severity ranges between very mild forms to extremely severe or lethal subtypes. Depending on disease subtypes, blisters may be localized also in larynx, bladder, esophagus, and most frequent disease complications are malnutrition, chronic anemia, osteoporosis, limb contracture and early development of squamous cell carcinomas. EB is classified into four major groups: EB simplex (EBS), junctional EB (JEB), dystrophic EB (DEB) and Kindler EB (KEB). No specific treatment is available; however, a multidisciplinary management is mandatory in order to treat the lesions, to prevent complication, and to give a psychological support to the patient and family members. OBJECTIVE: To report the experience on a therapeutic education plan of an Italian reference center for epidermolysis bullosa in the last 30 years. METHODS: In our study we included all patients with EB from 1990 to the present, dividing them into three age groups (< 5 years, > 5-12 years and > 12-18 years). The therapeutic plan involved all multidisciplinary team members, since born until adolescence. The multidisciplinary team has been progressively established; the dermatologists act as patient case manager, in collaboration with the pediatrician, endocrinologist, dietician, dentist, plastic surgeon, digestive surgeon, geneticist, psychologist and a dedicated nurse. Other dedicated specialists are involved upon patient needs. RESULTS: Two hundred fifteen patients have been recruited and followed in our hospital since 1990. One hundred forty patients (65%) are on follow-up, 27 patients (13%) died and only 11 (5%) were lost to follow-up. Our patients manifested the specific complications related to their EB subtype in keeping with the data reported in the literature. Eighteen (8%) patients affected with JEB severe died within the first year of life, 9 patients (5%) died for squamous cell carcinoma in adulthood and were affected with recessive DEB; only 1 patient died for squamous cell carcinoma at the age of 16. CONCLUSIONS: An adequate management of EB patients require a multidisciplinary approach with an educational plan to guarantee an appropriate treatment and to support and accompany patients and their families since birth along life. The dynamic educational plan adopted in our hospital showed good clinical and psychological outcome in our population, allowing adherence to treatment, reducing the frequency of complications and improving life expectancy and quality of life.

Epidemiological, clinical, pathological and genetic characteristics of epidermolysis bullosa in New Zealand.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the epidemiological, clinical, pathological and genetic characteristics of epidermolysis bullosa (EB) in New Zealand (NZ). METHODS: Participants were recruited through the Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Research Association of New Zealand (DEBRA NZ). Dedicated EB nurse medical records, Genetic Health Service NZ (GHSNZ) records and, where available, public hospital records were manually reviewed for relevant clinical data. RESULTS: Ninety-two participants took part in the study (56% participation rate). Forty-nine (53%) participants had EB simplex (EBS), 40 (43%) had dystrophic EB (DEB), and 3 (3%) had junctional EB (JEB). Point prevalence for EB of all types was 19.5 per million, and 10.4, 8.6 and 0.9 per million for EBS, DEB and JEB, respectively. Thirty-four participants had intermediate or severe EB. There were 29 paediatric cases and almost even numbers of males and females. Compared to NZ European and Maori, prevalence rates were lower for Pacific and Asian people and higher in the Middle Eastern/Latin American/African population. Eight out of 14 skin biopsy results were informative, and 14 of 15 genetic test results were informative. CONCLUSION: New Zealand has similar prevalence rates of EB compared with other national cohorts. This is likely to be an underestimate due to methodological limitations. Recent advancements in genomic testing have resulted in an improved diagnostic rate in our population. Further research into ethnic differences in prevalence, and exploring the characteristics of lethal forms of EB, is warranted. A dynamic registry may be helpful for the EB community in NZ.

The epidemiology of epidermolysis bullosa in England and Wales: data from the national epidermolysis bullosa database.

BACKGROUND: The National Health Service (NHS) epidermolysis bullosa (EB) service, established in 2002, offers comprehensive, free care to all patients in England and Wales. OBJECTIVES: To quantify prevalence, incidence and mortality of EB in England and Wales. METHODS: Demographic data for patients in England and Wales were collected on a secure electronic database, prospectively from January 2002 to April 2021 and retrospectively for cases prior to 2002. Vital status was verified using central NHS data. RESULTS: By March 2021, 2594 individuals were registered, of whom 2361 were living, which yielded a prevalence of 34·8 per million of the population for all EB types [EB simplex (EBS) 17 per million, dystrophic EB (DEB) 10·7 per million, junctional EB (JEB) 1 per million and Kindler EB 0·3 per million]. We recorded 1200 babies with EB born since 2002. The average incidence per million live births for EBS, DEB, JEB and Kindler EB was 32·5, 26·1, 8·9 and 0·9, respectively (total incidence for all types of EB was 67·8 per million). Birth rates fell progressively over the 19-year period for JEB-severe (JEB-S) (r = -0·56) and recessive DEB-severe (r = -0·44) and also for milder types of EB. We observed longer survival in JEB-S over the 19-year period (r2 = 0·18) with a median survival of 12·7 months over the past 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we provide the first accurate epidemiological data for EB in England and Wales. We believe the observed reduction in birth incidence of severe types of EB reflects an uptake of genetic counselling advice, whereas the reduction in milder types may be due to delayed presentation. A potential small trend towards longer survival of babies with JEB-S may reflect improved multidisciplinary care.

Overview of complications associated with epidermolysis bullosa: A multicenter retrospective clinical analysis of 152 cases.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare disease of skin and mucosa which may causes surgical complications. We review these in a large patient cohort from Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at 21 centers between 2003 and 2020. Demographic data and information on EB type [Simplex (EBA), Dystrophic (DEB) and Junctional (JEB)]. The dataset included clinical features, operations, surgical complications, and treatment. RESULTS: There were 152 (63 male) children with EB [EBS n = 93 (61.2%); DEB n = 30 (19.7%); JEB n = 25 (16.4%), and Kindler syndrome n = 4, (2.6%)]. Children with JEB and DEB tended to have a higher frequency of skin and musculoskeletal system complications (skin cancer, pseudosyndactyly and recurrent skin infection). Esophageal strictures were mostly seen in DEB (n = 19, 63%) and to a lesser extent in EBS (n = 20, 21%) and JEB (n = 4, 16%). Pyloric atresia was uncommon (n = 4) and limited to those with JEB. Percutaneous gastrostomy for feeding support was used in all types. Ankyloglossia was common but often recurred (76%) after division. Circumcision was usually safe and complication-free in male children except in those with severe JEB. Phimosis was reported in 10% of uncircumcised patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our series showed that surgeons play a key role in the management of some complications associated with EB. It is also important to be aware of the particular sub-type as this can predict the natural history and likely response to treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Inherited epidermolysis bullosa: epidemiology and patient care in Slovenia with a review of the updated classification.

INTRODUCTION: Inherited epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a heterogeneous group of rare genetic skin disorders characterized by fragility of the skin and mucous membranes. The prevalence of all types of EB is estimated at approximately 11 per million, based on recent data from the American National Epidermolysis Bullosa Registry. METHODS: A national registry of EB has not yet been established in Slovenia. Because all cases of EB are diagnosed and treated at our department, we have collected data on all known cases of EB in Slovenia. RESULTS: Based on our data, the prevalence of all EB types in Slovenia is about 20 per million. As of December 2020, our data consist of 29 EB simplex, three junctional EB, 10 dominant dystrophic EB, and four recessive dystrophic EB patients. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of all EB types in Slovenia is higher compared to the estimated prevalence in the United States. The multidisciplinary care of EB patients in Slovenia has been developed based on patients' needs, including a wide group of various specialists, and it has been adapted to the resources and treatment options available. This article also reviews the up-to-date classification and diagnostic protocol for EB, and international recommendations for interdisciplinary patient care.

Patient-reported outcomes and quality of life in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: A global cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: A spectrum of skin disease severity exists in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB). OBJECTIVE: To characterize the patient-reported outcomes and quality of life (QOL) in patients with RDEB. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of patients with RDEB surveyed through the global EBCare Registry. Patient-reported outcomes included skin disease severity, wound characteristics, pain, itch, extracutaneous symptoms, and medications. QOL was measured by using the validated Quality of Life in Epidermolysis Bullosa instrument. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients with RDEB reported 1226 wounds (937 recurrent wounds and 289 chronic open wounds). Overall skin disease severity was self-reported as mild (26%; 22/83), moderate (48%; 40/83), or severe (25%; 21/83). Worsening skin disease severity was significantly associated with larger wounds, increased opiate use, anemia, gastrostomy tube use, infections, osteoporosis, and squamous cell carcinoma. Larger wound size was associated with worse quality of life scores. LIMITATIONS: All data were self-reported from an online epidermolysis bullosa patient registry. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a significant correlation between larger wound size with worsening skin disease severity and quality of life in participants with RDEB. Worsening skin disease severity significantly correlated with key clinical manifestations. These results show that patients with RDEB are able to self-report their skin disease severity and wounds.

Novel insights into the epidemiology of epidermolysis bullosa (EB) from the Dutch EB Registry: EB more common than previously assumed?

BACKGROUND: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a heterogeneous group of rare and incurable genetic disorders characterized by fragility of the skin and mucosae, resulting in blisters and erosions. Several epidemiological studies in other populations have been carried out, reporting varying and sometimes inconclusive figures, highlighting the need for standardized epidemiological analyses in well-characterized cohorts. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the epidemiological data on EB in the Netherlands, extracted from the molecularly well-characterized cohort in the Dutch EB Registry. METHODS: In this observational study all EB-patients that were based in the Netherlands and captured in the Dutch EB Registry between 1988 and 2018 were included. The epidemiological outcomes were based on complete diagnostic data (clinical features, immunofluorescence, electron microscopy and mutation analysis), with longitudinal follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 464 EB-patients (287 families) were included. The incidence and point-prevalence of EB in the Netherlands were 41.3 per million live births and 22.4 per million population, respectively. EB Simplex (EBS), Junctional EB (JEB), Dystrophic EB (DEB) and Kindler EB were diagnosed in 45.7%, 18.8%, 34.7% and 0.9% of the EB-patients, respectively, with an incidence and point-prevalence of 17.5 and 11.9 (EBS), 9.3 and 2.1 (JEB), 14.1 and 8.3 (DEB), 0.5 and 0.2 (Kindler EB). In 90.5% of the EB-patients the diagnosis was genetically confirmed. During the investigated time period 73 EB-patients died, 72.6% of whom as a direct consequence of their EB. CONCLUSION: The epidemiological outcomes of EB in the Netherlands are high, attributed to a high detection rate in a well-organized set-up, indicating that EB might be more common than previously assumed. These epidemiological data help to understand the extensive need for (specialized) medical care of EB-patients and is invaluable for the design and execution of therapeutic trials. This study emphasizes the importance of thorough reporting systems and registries worldwide.

Prevalence, pathophysiology and management of itch in epidermolysis bullosa.

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a highly diverse group of inherited skin disorders, resulting from mutations in genes encoding proteins of the dermoepidermal junction. Itch (pruritus) is one of the most common symptoms across all EB subtypes. It occurs in blistered or wounded sites, or manifests as a generalized phenomenon, thereby affecting both intact skin and healing wounds. The mechanism of pruritus in EB is unclear. It is likely that skin inflammation secondary to barrier disruption, wound healing cascades and dysregulated activation of epidermal sensory nerve endings are all involved in its pathophysiology on the molecular and cellular level. Understanding these mechanisms in depth is crucial in developing optimized treatments for people with EB and improving quality of life. This review summarizes current evidence on the prevalence, mechanisms and management of itch in EB.

Next-generation sequencing through multigene panel testing for the diagnosis of hereditary epidermolysis bullosa in Chinese population.

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a heritable blistering disorder. We performed a next-generation sequencing-based multigene panel test and successfully predicted 100% of the EB types, including, 36 EB simplex (EBS), 13 junctional EB (JEB), 86 dystrophic EB (DEB), and 3 Kindler EB. Chinese JEB and recessive DEB (RDEB) patients have relatively mild phenotypes; for severe type separately accounts for 45.5% and 23.8%, respectively. We identified 96 novel and 49 recurrent pathogenic variants in 11 genes, although we failed to detect the second mutation in one JEB and five RDEB patients. We identified one novel p.E475K mosaic mutation in the clinically normal mother of one out of 13 EBS patients with KRT5 mutations, one recurrent p.G2034R mosaic mutation, and one novel p.G2043R mosaic mutation in the clinically normal relatives of two out of 19 dominant DEB patients. This study shows that next-generation technology could be an effective tool in diagnosing EB.

The challenges of living with and managing epidermolysis bullosa: insights from patients and caregivers.

BACKGROUND: Little information is available regarding the burden of living with and managing epidermolysis bullosa, including the distinct challenges faced by patients with different disease types/subtypes. METHODS: A 90-question/item survey was developed to collect demographics, diagnostic data, management practices, and burden of illness information for patients with epidermolysis bullosa living in the United States. Recruitment was conducted via email and social media in partnership with epidermolysis bullosa patient advocacy organizations in the United States, and the survey was conducted via telephone interview by a third-party health research firm. Respondents aged ≥ 18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa or caring for a patient with a confirmed diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa were eligible to participate in the survey. RESULTS: In total, 156 responses were received from patients (n = 63) and caregivers (n = 93) representing the epidermolysis bullosa types of simplex, junctional, and dystrophic (subtypes: dominant and recessive). A large proportion of patients (21%) and caregivers (32%) reported that the condition was severe or very severe, and 19% of patients and 26% of caregivers reported a visit to an emergency department in the 12 months prior to the survey. Among the types/subtypes represented, recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa results in the greatest wound burden, with approximately 60% of patients and caregivers reporting wounds covering > 30% of total body area. Wound care is time consuming and commonly requires significant caregiver assistance. Therapeutic options are urgently needed and reducing the number and severity of wounds was generally ranked as the most important treatment factor. CONCLUSIONS: Survey responses demonstrate that epidermolysis bullosa places a considerable burden on patients, their caregivers, and their families. The limitations caused by epidermolysis bullosa mean that both patients and caregivers must make difficult choices and compromises regarding education, career, and home life. Finally, survey results indicate that epidermolysis bullosa negatively impacts quality of life and causes financial burden to patients and their families.

An overview of the genetic basis of epidermolysis bullosa in Brazil: discovery of novel and recurrent disease-causing variants.

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a genodermatosis that encompasses a group of clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorders classified in four major types: EB simplex (EBS), junctional EB (JEB), dystrophic EB (DEB) and Kindler syndrome. Our aim was to characterize recurrent and novel mutations associated to EB in a sample of Brazilian patients. Eighty-seven patients (25 EBS, 4 JEB and 58 DEB) were studied. We performed a next-generation sequencing-based multigene panel through ion torrent technology including 11 genes: KRT5, KRT14, PLEC, TGM5, LAMA3, LAMB3, LAMC2, COL17A1, ITGB4, COL7A1, and FERMT1. A total of 72 different pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified, 32 of them are novel. The causal variant was detected in 82 patients (efficiency of 94.3%). Pathogenic variants in the residue 125 of KRT14 were identified in 32% of all EBS patients. In DEB patients, four COL7A1 variants were quite frequent, some of them clustered in specific Brazilian regions. Our study extends the spectrum of known mutations in EB and describes, for the first time, the genetic profile of EB patients from Brazil.

Phenotypic Spectrum of Epidermolysis Bullosa: The Paradigm of Syndromic versus Non-Syndromic Skin Fragility Disorders.

The heritable forms of epidermolysis bullosa (EB), a phenotypically heterogeneous group of skin fragility disorders, is currently associated with mutations in as many as 21 distinct genes. EB is primarily a disorder affecting the epithelial layers of skin and mucous membranes, without extracutaneous manifestations, and thus is nonsyndromic. However, recent demonstrations of skin blistering in multisystem disorders with single gene defects highlight the concept of syndromic EB. Here, we review the phenotypic and genotypic features of syndromic forms of EB to delineate the concept of syndromic versus nonsyndromic skin fragility disorders.