Etiology of tricuspid valve disease is a predictor of bradyarrhythmia after tricuspid valve surgery.

AIMS: The tricuspid valve is situated in close proximity to cardiac conduction tissue and damage to this tissue can affect postoperative rhythm. The aim of this study was to quantify the incidence of pacemaker requirement after tricuspid valve surgery and investigate predictors. METHODS: Data were collected via our operative data collection system and patient files. All patients who underwent surgical procedures of the tricuspid valve from 2004 until 2017 and lacked a pacemaker preoperatively were included in the study. RESULTS: In our cohort of 505 patients 54 required a pacemaker in the first 50 days after surgery. We calculated a 17.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.5-21.3) risk of pacemaker implantation at 4 years postoperatively. Multivariate analysis identified preoperative active endocarditis (odds ratio 3.17; CI, 1.32-7.65; P = 0.010) and "inadequate pacemaker dependent rhythm" (defined as any intrinsic heart rate below 45 per minute requiring pacing) upon admission to the intensive care unit after surgery (odds ratio 5.924; CI, 2.82-12.44; P = 0.001) as predictors for pacemaker requirement in the first 50 days after surgery. Twenty-six pacemakers (48%) were implanted for atrioventricular block, 16 (30%) for sinus node dysfunction and 12 (22%) for atrial fibrillation. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in survival between the pacemaker and no pacemaker group. CONCLUSION: Surgery of the tricuspid valve has a high burden of postoperative pacemaker requirement. Preoperative active endocarditis and the initial postoperative rhythm are predictors. Understanding this allows for better decision-making regarding further medical/device therapy.

Comparing outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with stenotic bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become an alternative treatment to surgery in patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis (BAV) are usually excluded from major TAVR studies. The aim of this study is to reexamine current evidence of TAVR in patients with severe aortic stenosis and BAV compared with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV). HYPOTHESIS: There might be differences in outcomes post TAVR between patients with BAV comparing to TAV. METHOD: Databases were systematically searched for relevant articles featuring cohort studies that included patients with BAV and TAV who underwent TAVR studies, of which reported outcomes of interest included mortality and complications in both groups. Pooled effect size was calculated with a random-effect model and weighted for the inverse of variance, to compare outcomes post-TAVR between BAV and TAV. RESULTS: Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was no difference in 30-day mortality rate in patients with BAV compared with TAV (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.84-1.93, I2 = 0). Patients with BAV were more likely to have a moderate to severe paravalvular leak (9 studies; OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.08-1.87, I2 = 0) and conversion to surgery (5 studies; OR: 5.48, 95% CI: 1.74-17.27, I2 = 0), and less likely to have device success compared with patients with TAV (5 studies; OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.40-0.81, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in mortality post-TAVR in patients with BAV compared with TAV. Further randomized studies should be done in newer-generation prostheses to assess this association.

Comparative study of bicuspid vs. tricuspid aortic valve stenosis.

Aims: To examine differences and similarities in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) stenosis occurring during the same age and whether any differences impact outcomes following aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods and results: An age-matched cohort of 198 BAV stenosis and 198 TAV stenosis patients was identified from 888 consecutive patients undergoing AVR for severe AS. Mean age 68 ± 6 years; 68% male. Patients with BAV were less likely to have multiple comorbidities, as measured by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) >2 (3 vs. 10%, P = 0.007). Indexed aortic valve area (0.44 ± 0.09 vs. 0.42 ± 0.08 cm2/m2, P = 0.17) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were similar (62 ± 11 vs. 61 ± 12%, P = 0.12), but E/e' ≥15 (46 vs. 66%, P = 0.0002) was less common in BAV stenosis. A tissue aortic valve prosthesis was more commonly utilized in both groups (81 vs. 78%, P = 0.54). Overall indexed effective orifice area was larger in BAV compared with TAV (1.08 ± 0.33 vs. 0.96 ± 0.25 cm2/m2, P = 0.0008). Five-year survival following AVR was lower in TAV compared with BAV stenosis (61 vs. 79%, P = 0.02). Independent predictors of survival following AVR were LVEF < 50% [hazard ratio (HR): 4.8, P = 0.0005], CCI > 2 (HR: 3.1, P = 0.015), effective orifice area index ≤0.85 cm2/m2 (HR: 2.5, P = 0.004), and bioprosthesis (HR: 3.7, P = 0.02). Conclusion: In an age-matched cohort, TAV compared with BAV stenosis is associated with greater prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and cardiac impairment and worse survival after AVR.

Long-term survival after isolated tricuspid valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Isolated replacement of the tricuspid valve is rare, and the decision to operate is difficult. This study reviews the in-hospital mortality and long-term survival after tricuspid valve replacement in the absence of concomitant left sided valve surgery. It identifies predictors of poor outcome. METHODS: All patients who underwent tricuspid valve replacement between January 1995 and December 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients having concomitant mitral or aortic valve surgery were excluded. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of early and late death. RESULTS: Twenty-nine cases were identified. There were six in-hospital deaths (20.6%), and eight late deaths. Ascites was associated with in-hospital death (hazard ratio 16.96; p=0.0052). Higher dose of Frusemide was associated with late mortality (hazard ratio 1.157 per 20mg increase; p=0.0155). Frusemide dose and ascites were both significantly associated with death overall (p<0.01). Survival analysis estimated a 50% probability of surviving to 12.45 years. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated tricuspid valve replacement has a high peri-operative risk. Long-term survival in this study was consistent with other reports. Ascites and higher doses of Frusemide were associated with poor outcomes.

Comparison of results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severely stenotic bicuspid versus tricuspid or nonbicuspid valves.

Data on transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for severe bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis and how this compares to that for tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) stenosis are limited. Twenty-one consecutive patients with BAV were treated with the Edwards or CoreValve bioprosthesis from November 2007 to December 2012 at San Raffaele Scientific Institute and Clinical Institute S. Ambrogio, Milan, Italy. Results were compared with a cohort of patients with TAV (n=447) treated with the same bioprostheses over the same period. Procedural 1- and 12-month outcomes were examined as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. Patients with BAV were younger (76.7±7.1 vs 79.8±7.4 years, p=0.06) and with a larger aortic annulus (25.0±1.8 vs 23.6±2.1 mm, p=0.01). Device success (85.7% vs 94.4%, p=0.10) was lower in patients with BAV. Although the 30-day composite safety end point (23.8% vs 21.0%, p=0.76) was similar between the 2 groups, mortality rate at 30 days was higher (14.2% vs 3.6%, p=0.02) in the BAV group. Cardiovascular mortality at 1 year did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (10.5% vs 7.4%, p=0.62). In conclusion, transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high surgical risk patients with severe BAV stenosis appears to be feasible with mid-term cardiovascular mortality similar to that for patients with TAV. Early survival and device success, however, were lower for patients with BAV demonstrating that further studies are required to identify which subset of patients with BAV is best suited for transcatheter treatment.

When should a mechanical tricuspid valve replacement be considered?

BACKGROUND: Isolated mechanical tricuspid valve replacement (mTVR) is uncommon, early mortality is reported to be high, and little is known regarding the long-term outcome. We sought to evaluate the long-term outcome of mTVR. METHODS: From 1980 to 2007, isolated mTVR was performed in 64 patients (33 men) at our institution; the median age was 45.5 years (6-71 years). There were 2192 tricuspid valve (TV) repairs and 137 isolated bioprosthetic TV replacements during the same time interval. Valve dysfunction was caused by congenital TV abnormality in 45 patients (70%), carcinoid heart disease in 13 (20%), traumatic TV regurgitation in 3 (5%), and other reason in 3 (5%). Twenty-three patients (36%) had at least 1 previous cardiac procedure (TV repair in 8 and bioprosthetic TV replacement in 7). RESULTS: Mechanical prostheses used included Starr-Edwards (before 1993) in 36 patients (56%) and bileaflet prostheses in 28 (44%). Concomitant procedures included atrial septal defect closure in 28 (44%), arrhythmia surgery in 11 (17%), and pulmonary valvectomy for carcinoid disease in 10 patients (16%). Early mortality occurred in 5 patients (7.8%). Early morbidity included a permanent pacemaker in 9 (14%) and reexploration for bleeding in 2 patients (3%). Mean follow-up was 6 years (maximum 22.4 years). Five- and 10-year survival was 65% and 58%, respectively. There was no valve-related mortality. Late morbidity included valve thrombosis in 5 patients (8%); 3 were managed nonoperatively and 2 underwent TV rereplacement. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated mTVR still leads to increased early mortality. A mechanical valve can be considered in select situations when anticoagulation is necessary and in the presence of good right ventricular function.

One and a half ventricle repair in adults: postoperative hemodynamic assessment using phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: One and a half ventricle repair (1½ repair) strategy has been used for patients with a hypoplastic or dysfunctional right ventricle (RV), or both. We sought to assess the postoperative hemodynamics of 1½ repair using phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI). METHODS: Ten adults, 9 with Ebstein's anomaly and 1 with tricuspid stenosis, underwent 1½ repair (median age at operation, 42.4 years). The azygos vein was left open in all patients on 1½ repair to prevent severe postoperative central venous hypertension. Postoperative PC-MRI studies were performed to measure blood flow to the ascending aorta (QAsc-Ao), the main pulmonary artery (QMPA), the superior vena cava (SVC) (QSVC), and the branch pulmonary arteries and veins. From these values, blood flow to the upper compartment of the body (QUC), right ventricular volume unloading effect (QMPA/QAsc-Ao), proportion of blood flow to the upper compartment of the body (QUC/QAsc-Ao), and venous return to arterial forward flow ratio of the upper compartment of the body (QSVC/QUC) were calculated. Two patients also underwent preoperative PC-MRI. RESULTS: On PC-MRI, QMPA/QAsc-Ao, QUC/QAsc-Ao, and QSVC/QUC were 0.58 to 0.84 (median, 0.67), 0.19 to 0.36 (median, 0.27), and 0.47 to 1.57 (median, 0.93, lower than 1.0 in 7 patients), respectively. In 2 patients who had preoperative and postoperative PC-MRI, QUC/QAsc-Ao decreased from 0.26, 0.32 to 0.21, 0.28, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: After 1½ repair, right ventricular volume unloading was effective in all patients, but intercaval collateral veins (ie. QSVC/QUC<1) appeared to develop in most of the patients. Furthermore blood flow to the upper compartment of the body appeared to diminish, presumably due to postoperative elevation of central venous pressure.

Clinical mid-term results after tricuspid valve replacement.

Tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Frequently, TVR is performed in critically ill patients with high frequency of re-intervention. We analyzed our experience in TVR focusing on predicting risk factors, mid-term survival and quality of life assessed with a Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire. Between January 1992 and May 2007, 81 consecutive patients underwent TVR (54 re-interventions, 66.7%; 46 procedures, associated with a left-sided operation, 56.8%). There were 59 females (73%) with a mean age of 59.3+/-11.6 years. The most prevalent etiology was rheumatic fever (61.7%). Pulmonary hypertension was present in 64%. Mean left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) was 56.6% and mean right ventricle ejection fraction (RVEF) was 48.1%. All but four patients (4.9%) received a bio-prosthesis. Hospital mortality was 9.88%. The mean follow-up was 61+/-42 months. Survival was 68% at five years. Univariate predictors of hospital mortality were atrial fibrillation (AFib) (P<0.01), associated procedures on the left heart (P=0.025) and preoperative chronic right heart failure symptoms (P<0.01). At follow-up: 10.8% of patients had a pace-maker (PM) induced rhythm; the mean SF-36 score was 51.1+/-4.8 (range 59-38). Age (P=0.015), associated procedures (P=0.024) and previous cardiovascular surgery (P=0.015) were univariate predictors of the SF-36 score. At a multivariate analysis LVEF, venous congestion and pulmonary artery pressures (PAPs) were related with a SF-36 score.

Evidence for rheumatic valve disease in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation long after mitral valve surgery: the role of 3D echo reconstruction.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Although severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a well-recognized, long-term complication of rheumatic mitral valve replacement that impairs the functional results of surgery, its exact basis remains unclear and its management is unsatisfactory. The study aim was to obtain a detailed assessment of tricuspid valve morphology and function using 2D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) with 3D reconstruction, and to determine long-term clinical outcome in patients after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease. METHODS: A total of 42 patients (mean age 50 +/- 10 years) was followed up; 39 patients had mitral replacement and three had valvotomy. Thirty patients had developed impaired exercise tolerance, fluid retention and echocardiographic evidence of severe TR at 8.2 +/- 2.6 years after surgery; the remainder had mild regurgitation. RESULTS: Follow up showed greater mortality in the severe TR group, with approximately 50% survival at 60 months after diagnosis compared with mild TR. None of the patients with severe TR had a dysfunctional mitral prosthesis. In these patients, transthoracic echo-Doppler showed enlarged right atrium and right ventricle, a mean transtricuspid retrograde pressure drop of 15 +/- 4 mmHg and apparently normal leaflet anatomy. Twenty patients (15 with severe TR) underwent a TEE and 3D reconstruction study for further evaluation. Abnormal leaflet anatomy was demonstrated in all patients with severe TR, with restricted leaflet motion in 10, leaflet shortening and thickening in the remainder, and dilatation of tricuspid valve annular insertion suggestive of rheumatic involvement. Although diastolic transtricuspid velocities were increased (peak flow 0.8 +/- 0.1 m/s) in these patients due to increased stroke volume, significant tricuspid stenosis was present in only two cases (mean gradient 4 and 3 mmHg respectively). Histopathology confirmed the presence of leaflet vascularization and extensive fibrosis in two patients who underwent tricuspid valve replacement. CONCLUSION: Rheumatic leaflet involvement contributes to severe TR occurring long after mitral valve replacement, though overt stenosis is uncommon. Knowledge of the structural basis of this condition may thus improve its long-term management, possibly with early tricuspid valve repair.

Tricuspid valve involvement in combined mitral and aortic valve surgery.

BACKGROUND: Combined mitral and aortic valve disease requiring surgery may involve the tricuspid valve as well. Our treatment policy is conservative especially for tricuspid regurgitation which is operated on when severe only. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed at a tertiary and secondary referral center for cardiovascular disease. Over a 15-year period, 65 consecutive patients underwent aortic and mitral surgery with concomitant tricuspid regurgitation and/or stenosis. Fifty-five/65 (85%) patients were in NYHA class III-IV. Fifty-eight/65 (89%) patients had tricuspid regurgitation secondary to right chamber dilatation and 7/65 (11%) had tricuspid stenosis and/or regurgitation because of previous endocarditis. Twenty-two/65 (34%) tricuspid valves were operated on: 18/22 (82%) de Vega annuloplasty, 2/22 (9%) commissurotomies and 2/22 (9%) prosthetic valves. Mortality and complications were recorded during a mean follow-up of 5.3 yrs (range, 6 months-15.3 yrs). Event-free survivals were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 6.2% (4/65) and the complication rate was 18.5% (12/65). The freedom from late valve related mortality and morbidity at 5, 10 and 15 years was 86+/-5.5%, 81.9+/-6.8%, and 81.9+/-6.8% respectively. One valve related complication was due to the tricuspid valve. At last follow-up, 87% (47/54) of the survivors were in NYHA class I-II. CONCLUSIONS: With a conservative policy of tricuspid valve intervention, functional results of this patient population are good and long-term valve related morbidity and mortality are mainly related to the mitral and aortic valve procedures.

Outcome following isolated tricuspid valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: The clinical outcome of isolated tricuspid valve replacement is not well defined because this procedure is usually performed concomitantly with other valve surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively studied the short and long-term outcome of 15 consecutive patients (six men and nine women, aged 61+/-3 years) undergoing isolated tricuspid valve replacement from 1984 to 1996. The cause of valve dysfunction was rheumatic heart disease in 12 patients, healed endocarditis in two patients, and sarcoidosis in one patient. The tricuspid valve was stenotic in one patient, regurgitant in eight patients, and both stenotic and regurgitant in six patients. A St. Jude Medical prosthesis was placed in eight patients, Carpentier-Edwards in five patients, and Björk-Shiley and Starr-Edwards in one patient each. RESULTS: The median survival was only 1.2 years. Three patients (20%) died < or =30 days after the surgery or before discharge, and six other patients (40%) died within 3 years of surgery. Anasarca was the only predictor of short-term mortality (P=0.03), while the predictors of long-term mortality were anemia (P=0.01), rheumatic heart disease (P=0.04), previous stroke (P=0.04), and previous mitral valve surgery (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Isolated tricuspid valve replacement is characterized by a poor short and long-term outcome.

Tricuspid valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical valve: 19 years of experience.

OBJECTIVE: The choice of the valve substitute in the tricuspid position remains controversial. A St. Jude Medical valve is a choice of valve substitute and its lower thrombogenicity and excellent hemodynamic performance have been reported even in the tricuspid position. However, little is known of the long-term durability of the St. Jude Medical valve in the tricuspid position. Our long-term experience of tricuspid valve replacement showed the higher thrombogenicity than we had expected, therefore, this study was done to reconsider our strategy for valve choice. METHODS: This study reviewed 23 patient who underwent 25 tricuspid valve replacements with the St. Jude Medical valves from 1980 to 1997. The mean age was 40 years. Eleven patients (48%) were men. There were four in-hospital deaths (17%). The remaining 19 patients were all alive and followed from 2.2 to 19.0 years (mean 11.8 years). RESULTS: The overall survival, including hospital mortality, was 83%, 10 and 15 years after surgery. Valve thrombosis occurred in six patients. Freedom from valve thrombosis was 78 and 70%, 10 and 15 years after surgery, respectively. The linearized rate of the valve thrombosis was 2.9%/patient-years. Six patients required reoperation. The mean interval to reoperation was 9.5 years. Freedom from reoperation was 83% and 75%, 10 and 15 years after surgery, respectively. The linearized rate of the reoperation was 2.8%/patient-years. No structural valve deterioration was found. Echocardiographic study showed that the function of the St. Jude Medical valve without valve-related complications was well maintained. CONCLUSIONS: The higher thrombogenicity of the St. Jude Medical valve in the tricuspid position altered our choice of valve substitutes from the St. Jude Medical valve to a bioprosthesis which is lack of need for anticoagulant therapy except for juvenile patients who are able to maintain potent anticoagulant therapy.

Tricuspid valve replacement subsequent to previous open heart surgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OF THE STUDY: Earlier surgical intervention to the mitral and/or aortic valve means that it will be uncommon to replace the tricuspid valve (TVR) in a patient who has not had prior open heart surgery. METHODS: We report the short and medium term results of a consecutive series of 14 patients who underwent bioprosthetic TVR between December 1985 and February 1993 at the Hammersmith Hospital, UK. All patients had undergone previous open heart surgery on at least one occasion. Mean patient age was 59 years (range: 45-77 years), 11 were female and three were male. Ten patients (72%) were in New York Heart Association class III or IV preoperatively, eight patients were first time reoperations and six patients were second time reoperations. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 50% (7/14). Of these seven patients, six were in NYHA class III or IV preoperatively, and three were second time reoperations. There were no 'on-the-table deaths' and no patients required reoperation for bleeding or permanent pacing. For the patients discharged from hospital, the mean follow up was 46 months (range 9-84 months) and it was 100% complete. There was no significant difference in the preoperative assessment data between the hospital mortality group and the patients who left hospital (p > 0.05). Of the patients discharged, four (57% of this group, 28.5% of all patients) showed an improvement in NYHA classification and all patients reported a reduction in peripheral edema. Amongst the survivors there was 100% freedom from valve related complications. Within this group there have been three deaths since discharge, all due to biventricular failure. CONCLUSIONS: From this study we conclude that TVR in patients who have had prior cardiac surgery is a high risk procedure. Nonetheless, amongst survivors, benefit may be gained by either a reduction in peripheral edema and/or an improvement in NYHA class.

Tricuspid valve replacement in rheumatic disease: preoperative predictors of hospital mortality.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The study analyzes the possible predictive power of different clinical and hemodynamic parameters with regard to hospital mortality after the first tricuspid valve replacement. METHODS: A retrospective study of 62 consecutive patients undergoing tricuspid valve replacement from 1974 to 1994 (7.2% of all tricuspid surgery performed at our institution in this period) was completed. Hospital mortality was 37%. Twenty-three patients died in hospital after the first tricuspid valve replacement (group I) and 39 patients (group II) survived this procedure. Tricuspid insufficiency was organic in 87% of group I and 84.6% of group II. RESULTS: The parameters showing significant differences between the two groups were NYHA class IV (p = 0.05), severe congestive heart failure (p = 0.02), mean right atrial pressure (p = 0.05), pulmonary arterial resistance (p = 0.006) and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (p = 0.0001). Cardiopulmonary bypass time (p = 0.005) and aortic cross-clamp time (p = 0.05) were longer in group I. Multiple regression analysis showed that the variables with greatest predictive power for hospital death were preoperative functional class, congestive heart failure and mean pulmonary artery pressure. The model gave a p < 0.001, with r = 0.58. CONCLUSIONS: The high hospital mortality rate after tricuspid valve replacement seems to be related to clinical functional class, severe congestive heart failure, and to chronic hemodynamic changes in the right atrium and pulmonary circulation.

Tricuspid valve replacement. Fifteen years of experience with mechanical prostheses and bioprostheses.

Tricuspid valve replacement is not a common operation. The purpose of this study was to examine the early and late results in 60 patients who underwent 28 (47%) bioprosthetic and 32 (53%) mechanical tricuspid valve replacements. All operations took place between January 1978 and June 1993 during which period a total of 4741 patients underwent valve replacement operation. Mean patient age was 50 +/- 15 (18 to 75) years. Forty-one patients (68%) were female and 19 patients (32%) were male. Forty-nine patients (82%) were in New York Heart Association class III or IV before operation. Forty-five patients (75%) were undergoing repeat cardiac valve operation. Seventeen patients (28%) had complex congenital cardiac problems. Operation was urgent in 15 patients (25%). The hospital mortality rate was 27% (16 patients). All patients with hospital death were in New York Heart Association class III or IV, were having repeat operations, or had complex congenital disease. Low output syndrome was observed in 21 patients (35%). Reoperation because of bleeding was required in seven patients (12%). Thirteen patients (22%) required permanent (epicardial lead) pacemaker implantation. Mean follow-up is 75 +/- 45 months (maximum 173 months) and 100% complete for the 44 patients who left the hospital. There have been 14 deaths (32%). Nine of these patients (64%) had mechanical valves and five (36%) had bioprostheses. Of the 11 cardiac deaths, three were valve related (bioprostheses). Three patients (10%) required reoperation because of tricuspid valve prosthetic failure (1 thrombosed mechanical valve, 2 failed porcine valves). Of the remaining 30 patients, 20 (67%) are in New York Heart Association class I or II. Seventeen patients have mechanical valves and 13 have bioprostheses. Twenty-six patients (90%) are receiving warfarin. Thromboembolism (transient ischemic attack) has occurred in one patient with a mechanical valve who also had a previous cerebrovascular accident. In this group there has been no hemorrhage, endocarditis, or new pacemaker requirement. Actuarial survival for the whole series is 37% +/- 9% and for the hospital survivors is 50% +/- 12% at 15 years. Linearized rates of valve-related complications are not different between groups. Tricuspid valve replacement is a beneficial procedure for patients with structural tricuspid valve disease, many of whom have other valvular or congenital disease. Contemporary mechanical prostheses and bioprostheses are equally effective in the tricuspid position. Mechanical valves should be considered for tricuspid replacement in young patients and in patients with mechanical valves implanted in the left side of the heart.

The valve choice in tricuspid valve replacement: 25 years of experience.

This study reviews 146 consecutive patients who underwent tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) with 69 bioprostheses (porcine and bovine pericardial) and 77 mechanical ball, disc or bileaflet valves between 1967 and 1987. The mean age was 51.4 +/- 12.1 years. Preoperatively, 97% were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or more and over 40% had undergone previous cardiac surgery. Hospital mortality was high (16.1%). Incremental risk factors for hospital death were preoperative icterus (P < 0.01), hepatomegaly (P = 0.02), NYHA functional class IV (P = 0.02) and male sex (P = 0.04) (univariate analysis). Ninety-eight percent of the hospital survivors were followed up for a mean of 92 months. Cumulative follow-up added up to 955 patient-years. There were 70 late deaths. The actuarial survival rate was 74% at 60 months and less than 25% at 14 years. Incremental risk factors for late death indicated by univariate analysis were the type of tricuspid prosthesis (Smel-off-Cutter and Kay-Shiley prostheses) (P = 0.04), the type of operative myocardial protection (normothermia and coronary perfusion) (P = 0.05) and preoperative NYHA functional class IV (P = 0.05). We conclude that TVR carries a high operative risk and poor long-term survival, both influenced by preoperative and perioperative variables. Bearing in mind the poor prognosis for TVR, we prefer a large-sized bioprosthesis, in view of its initial good durability and low risk of valve-related events. However, in patients with good life expectancy, a bileaflet mechanical prosthesis may be an acceptable alternative.

Surgery for organic rheumatic disease of the tricuspid valve.

The paucity of reports on the incidence and management of organic involvement of the tricuspid valve in rheumatic disease led us to carry out this retrospective study. Over a four and a half year period, of the 1052 patients undergoing valve surgery at our institution, 253 (24.05%) required tricuspid surgery. Organic involvement was noted in 115 (45.45%) of these patients. Definitive preoperative diagnosis was feasible by echocardiogram in only 48 (41.73%). Tricuspid regurgitation was present in all patients while detectable stenosis was present in 48 (41.7%). Annular dilatation was seen in 52 (45.2%). Primary repair was possible in 107 patients (93.0%). The reduction in tricuspid regurgitation remained stable at the last follow up in all but seven patients. Nine patients underwent reoperation in this study for failure of left-sided valve repairs, of which five needed reoperation on the tricuspid valve. All the five reoperated tricuspid valves had had dilated annuli at primary surgery. The presence or absence of annular dilatation did not cause any significant difference in early or late mortality. The presence of annular dilatation in the presence of left-sided valve lesions superimposed on organically involved tricuspid valves evokes the possibility of the presence of an organo-functional disease.

Early and late phase events following bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement.

From 1961 through 1987, 9,247 patients underwent an intracardiac repair for valvular heart disease. Five hundred thirty patients had a procedure that included a tricuspid valve operation (6%), with tricuspid valve replacement performed in 175 patients (2%), of whom 154 had a bioprosthetic valve implanted (1.7%). These 154 patients with a bioprosthetic valve in the tricuspid position are the subject of this review. There were 27 males and 127 females. Ages ranged from 10 to 75 years. There was tricuspid valve insufficiency in 139 patients (90%), and stenosis plus insufficiency in 15 (10%). Carpentier-Edwards prostheses were implanted in 83 (54%), Ionescu-Shiley in 55 (35%), Hancock in 12 (8%), and Mitroflow in 4 (3%). Concomitant procedures were performed in 146 patients (95%). At least one previous operation had been performed in 86 patients (56%). Preoperatively, 139 patients were in functional Class III or IV (90%). Hospital death occurred in 20 patients (13%). Logistic regression analysis revealed that incremental risk factors for hospital death included increasing peripheral edema preoperatively (p = 0.04), and use of a Hancock prosthesis in the tricuspid position (p = 0.03). All 134 hospital survivors were followed at a mean of 66.01 months, range 1 to 162 months. There were 70 late deaths (52%). Log-rank test indicated that incremental risk factors for late death were: longer cross-clamp time at repair (p = 0.0007); higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure preoperatively (p = 0.01); earlier date of surgery (p = 0.03); and larger tricuspid prosthesis size (p = 0.06).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Long-term results of porcine bioprostheses in the tricuspid position.

Between 1974 and 1990, 58 patients underwent tricuspid valve replacement with porcine bioprostheses (Hancock 42, Carpentier-Edwards 16) during multiple valve replacement (double, 21; triple, 37). Perioperative mortality was 12%; 16 patients died later, mostly from cardiac causes. Actuarial survival (1 patient lost to follow-up) was 81% +/- 11% at 5 years, and 60 +/- 17% at 10 years. Reoperation because of Hancock prosthesis deterioration was performed in 2 patients at 11 and 15 years, respectively. At last follow-up (mean 108 +/- 48 months), 82% of survivors (28/34) were functionally improved. Doppler echocardiography was performed in 29 patients in February 1991. In 21 patients, after 88 +/- 40 months of follow-up, the bioprosthesis was normal, there was no leaflet malformation, no significant tricuspid regurgitation and the mean diastolic transprosthetic gradient (DTPG) was 3.8 +/- 1.7 mmHg. In 7 patients (follow-up: 129 +/- 40 months, P less than 0.05), there was moderate dysfunction (all Hancock prostheses) with leaflet sclerosis, tricuspid regurgitation grade 2, and mean DTPG 5.7 +/- 1.8 mmHg (P less than 0.05). Only 1 patient (Hancock prosthesis implanted in 1981) had severe tricuspid prosthesis stenosis with very thickened leaflets and mean DTPG 13 mmHg. Pulmonary artery hypertension (most often fixed) was present in 11 patients, associated with a poor functional result and a significantly higher DTPG. We conclude that porcine bioprostheses in tricuspid position have an acceptable long-term durability and satisfactory performance. Prosthetic dysfunction correlates with the length of follow-up of patients and with the presence of fixed pulmonary artery hypertension.

Determination of the need for tricuspid valve replacement: value of preoperative right ventricular angiocardiography.

Of 530 patients undergoing tricuspid valve surgery from January 1, 1961 through December 31, 1987, those 362 patients having had preoperative right ventricular angiocardiography were studied. Mean age was 58.5 years. There were 71 males and 291 females. Tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) was performed in 126 (34.8%), and 236 underwent tricuspid valve repair (65.2%). The predominant pathology was combined tricuspid insufficiency and stenosis in 18 patients (4.9%), and isolated tricuspid insufficiency in 344 (95.1%). There were no complications related to the right ventriculogram. Preoperative angiographic severity of tricuspid valve incompetence was grade 1 in 23 patients (6.4%), grade 2 in 65 (17.9%), grade 3 in 109 (30.1%), and grade 4 in 165 (45.6%). Intraoperative assessment of the severity of tricuspid valve incompetence correlated 72% of the time with the preoperative angiographic assessment, in those patients with more severe degrees of incompetence (grade 3+ or 4+), p (X 2) less than 0.001. Increasing severity of preoperative angiographic triscuspid valve incompetence was associated with the requirement for TVR (vs. repair), p (X 2) = 0.0002. In conclusion, preoperative right ventricular angiography is a useful method for assessing tricuspid valve function and may predict the requirement for TVR in patients undergoing tricuspid valve surgery.