Determination of 13-cis-Retinoic Acid and Its Metabolites in Plasma by Micellar Electrokinetic Chromatography Using Cyclodextrin-Assisted Sweeping for Sample Preconcentration.

The online preconcentration technique, cyclodextrin-assisted sweeping (CD-sweeping), coupled with micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) was established to determine 13-cis-retinoic acid (13-cis-RA), all-trans-retinoic acid (all-trans-RA) and 4-oxo-13-cis-retinoic acid (4-oxo-13-cis-RA) in human plasma. A CD-sweeping buffer (45 mM borate (pH 9.2), containing 80 mM sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and 22 mM hydroxypropyl ß-CD (HP-ß-CD) was introduced into the capillary and, then, the sample dissolved in 70 mM borate (pH 9.2): methanol = 9:1 (v/v) was injected into capillary by pressure. The separation voltage was 23 kV. Compared to the conventional cyclodextrin-micellar electrokinetic chromatography (CD-MEKC) method, the new technique achieved 224-257-fold sensitivity enrichment of analytes. The limits of detection of 13-cis-RA, all-trans-RA were 1 ng/mL, whereas that of 4-oxo-13-cis-RA was 25 ng/mL in plasma. The linear ranges of 13-cis-RA, all-trans-RA were between 15 and 1000 ng/mL, whereas that of 4-oxo-13-cis-RA was between 75 and 1500 ng/mL. The coefficient of correlation between the concentration of analytes and peak area ratio of analytes and internal standard (2, 4-dihydroxy-benzophenone) for intra-day (n = 3) and inter-day (n = 5) analyses were both greater than 0.999. The optimized experimental conditions were successfully applied to determine 13-cis-retinoic acid and its metabolites in plasma samples from a patient during the administration of 13-cis-RA for treating acne.

Predictors of Systemic Exposure to Topical Crisaborole: A Nonlinear Regression Analysis.

Crisaborole ointment, 2%, is a nonsteroidal phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor for the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis. Results from 2 randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase 3 studies showed that twice-daily crisaborole in children and adults with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis was efficacious and well tolerated. Initial pharmacokinetics (PK) studies of crisaborole indicated absorption with measurable systemic levels of crisaborole. The current analysis was conducted to correlate steady-state systemic exposure parameters with ointment dose and identify covariates impacting PK parameters in healthy participants and patients with atopic dermatitis or psoriasis. A nonlinear regression analysis was conducted using ointment dose and noncompartmental PK parameters at steady state (area under the curve [AUCss ] and maximum concentration [Cmax,ss ]). PK data were available from 244 participants across 6 clinical studies (AUCss , N = 239; Cmax,ss , N = 241). Disease condition had the greatest impact on slope in both models, corresponding to 2.5-fold higher AUCss and Cmax,ss values at a given ointment dose in patients with atopic dermatitis or psoriasis relative to healthy participants. Disease severity, race/ethnicity, and sex had marginal effects on AUCss and Cmax,ss . Systemic exposures were similar across age groups ≥2 years of age when the same percentage of body surface area (%BSA) was treated. Predictive performance plots for AUCss and Cmax,ss for different age groups demonstrated that the models adequately describe the observed data. Model predictions indicated that systemic exposure to crisaborole in pediatric patients (2-17 years) is unlikely to exceed systemic exposure in adults (≥18 years), even at the highest possible ointment dose corresponding to a %BSA of 90.

Ustekinumab serum concentrations are associated with clinical outcomes in Crohn's disease - a regional multi-center pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in ustekinumab (UST) therapy for Crohn's disease (CD) has not been established, as only few studies have analyzed the relationship between UST serum concentrations and clinical outcome. In this pilot study, we retrospectively examined the potential of UST-concentrations (cUST) 8 weeks after induction (cUSTw8) to predict clinical response at week 16. METHODS: Serum samples and clinical data from patients (n = 72) with moderate to severely active CD who received intravenous induction with UST were retrospectively analyzed. cUST were quantitated using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MSMS). A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under ROC curve (AUROC) was computed to analyze the predictive potential of cUSTw8 for clinical response at week 16 and to determine the minimal therapeutic UST trough concentration. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (61 %) achieved clinical response to UST therapy at week 16. cUSTw8 was moderately effective to predict clinical response with a minimal therapeutic cUSTw8 of 2.0 mg/l (AUC 0.72, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Trough concentrations of UST 8 weeks after induction predict clinical response to therapy in week 16 with moderate sensitivity and specificity. TDM using LC-MSMS could prove beneficial in personalized UST therapy of patients with CD by identifying individuals with subtherapeutic concentrations who might benefit from dose escalation.

Usefulness and correlation with clinical response of serum ustekinumab levels measured at 6 weeks versus 12 weeks.

BACKGROUND: Monitoring serum drug levels has been proposed as a useful tool for improving and personalizing the management of psoriasis. However, in the case of ustekinumab the usefulness of such monitoring was not demonstrated when drug levels were measured at week 12. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the correlation of serum ustekinumab levels measured at weeks 6 and 12 with clinical response. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, we enrolled patients with psoriasis treated with ustekinumab 45 mg every 12 weeks for at least 24 weeks. We measured serum ustekinumab levels at weeks 6 and 12 in each patient. Using the absolute PASI score, response to treatment was defined as optimal (≤1), excellent (≤3), appropriate (>3 and ≤5), or inappropriate (>5). RESULTS: About 54 serum samples from 27 patients were analyzed. No correlation was found between serum drug levels and absolute PASI at week 12. At week 6, an inverse linear correlation was found (p = .0001). Moreover, serum levels at week 6 were higher in patients with optimal, excellent and appropriate responses than in patients with an inappropriate response. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of ustekinumab serum levels at week 6 could provide useful information in routine clinical practice.

Pharmacokinetics of low-dose methotrexate in healthy beagle dogs.

Methotrexate may be an alternative to ciclosporin in the treatment of canine atopic dermatitis (cAD) as suggested by recent data. The aim of the study was to investigate both the tolerance and the pharmacokinetic behavior of methotrexate (MTX) in plasma, following intravenous (i.v.), subcutaneous (s.c.) or oral (OR) administration over several weeks. Six healthy dogs were given oral MTX once a week, respectively, per dog at 2.5 mg/1 week, 5 mg/4 weeks, 7.5 mg/3 weeks, 10 mg/6 weeks and 12.5 mg/5 weeks. No clinically relevant abnormalities of laboratory parameters were noticed. A high inter-individual variation of MTX plasma concentration was observed with a suspicion of saturation phenomenon in absorption. To compare with other routes of administration, six healthy beagle dogs followed a crossover design study at 7.5 mg per dog MTX. The absolute bioavailability was 93% for SC injection and 30% for the oral route. The inter-individual variability was quite low following SC administration compared to oral route. Just as in human, given the substantial variability of oral absorption, clinicians cannot assume consistent oral bioavailability of MTX. Therefore, they may consider switching dogs to the SC route in case of absence of clinical response with a weekly oral dose.

Exposure-Response Modeling to Characterize the Relationship Between Ixekizumab Serum Drug Concentrations and Efficacy Responses at Week 12 in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis.

Ixekizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody, selectively targets interleukin-17A and has been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. The objective was to describe the relationship between ixekizumab concentrations and efficacy response (static Physician Global Assessment [sPGA] and the Psoriasis Activity and Severity Index [PASI) scores] after 12 weeks of ixekizumab treatment in psoriasis patients from 3 phase 3 studies. Data from 2888 psoriasis patients randomized to receive placebo or 80 mg ixekizumab every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks were analyzed. Separate logistic regression models describing the relationship between ixekizumab concentrations and sPGA or PASI scores at week 12 were used to determine the probability of patients achieving a response and to investigate the impact of various patient factors other than drug concentrations on response rates. Both dosing regimens were efficacious, with higher rates of response achieved with the higher range of observed ixekizumab concentrations after every-2-week dosing. Although higher bodyweight, palmoplantar involvement, lower baseline disease state, or high baseline C-reactive protein were associated with slightly lower response rates, the magnitude of effect of these factors on sPGA(0,1) response was small, with all subgroups able to achieve high levels of response. Other factors tested had no effect including age, sex, and antidrug antibody status. Logistic regression modeling of ixekizumab concentration and efficacy data accurately identified the proportion of responders using sPGA or PASI end points. The higher concentration ranges achieved with 80 mg every 2 weeks versus every 4 weeks were associated with higher response levels.

Long-term optimization of outcomes with flexible adalimumab dosing in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: The recently updated dosing recommendation for adalimumab for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis states that patients with inadequate response to adalimumab every other week (EOW) after 16 weeks may benefit from an increase in dosing frequency to 40 mg every week (EW). OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term efficacy of adalimumab in patients with psoriasis with flexibility to escalate and de-escalate between EOW and EW dosing. METHODS: Data from an open-label study in patients with psoriasis who had received adalimumab in phase 2/3 studies and their extensions were included. Patients initially received 40 mg adalimumab EOW for 24 weeks. From weeks 24-252, patients whose Psoriasis Area and Severity Index response was <50% (PASI 50) could have their dose-escalated to 40 mg EW and were re-evaluated at 6 and 12 weeks and then every 12 weeks thereafter. Patients who had their dose-escalated and achieved a PASI 75 response were de-escalated to EOW and could re-escalate to EW if response fell below PASI 50 again; no further de-escalation was allowed. Changes in PASI scores were reported at the last visit before dose escalation or de-escalation. RESULTS: By week 24, 64.1% of patients in the overall population (n = 1256) achieved ≥PASI 75 response, 40.3% ≥PASI 90 response and 21.7% PASI 100 response. Patients who had a

Prolongation of Biologic Dosing Intervals in Patients With Stable Psoriasis: A Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: Biologics are usually licensed according to the "one dose fits all" principle. It is therefore suspected that a significant number of patients with psoriasis are overtreated. However, evidence for successful dose reduction of biologics in psoriasis is scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the dosing interval of 3 biologics, adalimumab, etanercept, or ustekinumab could be prolonged successfully in patients with plaque psoriasis. METHODS: In a prospective exploratory cohort study, 59 patients with psoriasis on maintenance treatment with adalimumab, etanercept, or ustekinumab were included. After a run-in period of 6 weeks, the dosing interval of the biologics was prolonged according to a predefined schedule. Our primary objective was to determine the proportion of patients who could maintain a successful prolongation of the per label dosing interval. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the predictive value of baseline serum trough concentrations for successful dosing interval prolongation and to explore the feasibility of dosing interval prolongations in off-label-treated patients. RESULTS: In the per label group, 7 out of 16 (44%) adalimumab patients, 5 out of 16 (31%) etanercept patients, and 2 out of 10 (20%) ustekinumab patients achieved a successful dosing interval prolongation. Baseline serum trough concentrations did not differ significantly between patients with successful dosing interval prolongation and failures. In the off-label group, prolongation in patients with already extended intervals was unsuccessful. For patients with shortened intervals, minor prolongation was successful in 3 out of 17 (17.6%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Prolongation of the per label biologic dosing interval was feasible in approximately 30% of patients with psoriasis with stable minimal disease activity and can reduce costs in clinical practice. Baseline serum trough concentrations were not predictive for successful dosing interval prolongation.

Efficacy and safety of dose escalation of infliximab therapy in Japanese patients with psoriasis: Results of the SPREAD study.

Although infliximab is approved for psoriasis, its efficacy is reduced over time in some patients. The aim of this phase III trial is to evaluate efficacy and safety of infliximab dose escalation in Japanese psoriasis patients with loss of efficacy to standard-dose therapy. Patients with plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, pustular psoriasis or psoriatic erythroderma who showed loss of efficacy to standard-dose therapy received infliximab dose escalation (10 mg/kg every 8 weeks) from weeks 0 to 32. Loss of efficacy was defined as not maintaining 50% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) after achieving PASI 75. Efficacy and safety were evaluated up to week 40. Fifty-one patients received dose escalation and 43 completed the study. PASI 75 and median improvement rate of PASI score at week 40 were 44% and 70.0%, respectively, showing efficacy in skin symptoms. Efficacies in quality of life, nail psoriasis and joint pain were also obtained. Median serum infliximab level increased from less than 0.1 to 1.1 µg/mL from weeks 0 to 40, showing positive correlation between efficacy and serum infliximab level at week 40. Favorable efficacy was observed in patients with detectable serum infliximab levels (≥0.1 µg/mL) at baseline. Incidences of adverse events, serious adverse events, serious infections and serious infusion reactions were 92%, 10%, 4% and 0%, respectively. No marked difference was observed in both efficacy and safety among psoriasis types. No new safety concerns were observed. Infliximab dose escalation was effective and well-tolerated in psoriasis patients with loss of efficacy to standard-dose therapy, suggesting that dose escalation may be a useful therapeutic option for these patients.

First-in-human study to assess guselkumab (anti-IL-23 mAb) pharmacokinetics/safety in healthy subjects and patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of guselkumab, a human monoclonal antibody with high affinity and specificity for binding to interleukin-23. METHODS: In this first-in-human, phase 1, randomized study, a single intravenous (IV; 0.03-10 mg/kg) or subcutaneous (SC; 10-300 mg) dose of guselkumab was administered to 47 healthy subjects, and a single SC dose (placebo, 10, 30, 100, 300 mg) was administered to 24 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. RESULTS: Mean maximum observed serum concentration and area under the zero-to-infinity serum concentration-time curve of guselkumab increased in an approximately dose-proportional manner over the dose range of 0.03-10 mg/kg following a single IV administration or 10-300 mg following a single SC administration. Mean clearance and volume of distribution ranged from 3.62-6.03 mL/day/kg and 99.38-123.22 mL/kg, respectively. Mean half-life ranged from 12 to 19 days in healthy subjects and patients with psoriasis. Among guselkumab-treated subjects/patients, 1/30 (3.3 %) healthy subjects in the IV group, 0/6 healthy subjects in the SC group, and 1/20 (5.0 %) patients with psoriasis tested positive for antibodies to guselkumab. No clinically significant adverse events were identified in this study. CONCLUSION: Guselkumab pharmacokinetic profiles were generally comparable between healthy subjects and patients with psoriasis. Guselkumab, administered as an IV infusion or SC injection, was well tolerated in healthy subjects and patients with psoriasis.

Efficacy of Novel Topical Liposomal Formulation of Cyclosporine in Mild to Moderate Stable Plaque Psoriasis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Attempts to use topical cyclosporine in treatment of psoriasis have failed because of unfavorable physicochemical properties and inappropriate formulation design of the conventional dosage forms. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of topical cyclosporine using liposomal nanocarriers (lipogel) in limited chronic plaque psoriasis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND, PARTICIPANTS: A single-center randomized clinical trial was conducted using a 3-arm parallel group, double-blind, vehicle and active comparator design and included 38 patients with chronic plaque psoriasis measuring less than or equal to 100 cm2 performed in a tertiary care hospital. INTERVENTIONS: In the first arm, a total of 24 patients were randomized to receive either cyclosporine lipogel, 2.0% weight by weight (w/w), or placebo lipogel. In the second arm, 7 patients were randomized to receive cyclosporine lipogel, 2.0%, or conventional cyclosporine cream, 2.0% w/w. The third arm comprised 7 patients randomized with cyclosporine lipogel, 2.0% or standard clobetasol propionate cream, 0.05% w/w. Patients were examined twice weekly for 14 weeks, or until total lesional clearance was observed, whichever was earlier. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the dermatological sum score (DSS) assessing erythema, scaling, and plaque elevation on a 4-point scale (0, absent; 1, minimal; 2, moderate; 3, severe). RESULTS: In 38 patients (23 men and 15 women with a mean [SD] age range from 35 [8] to 40 [13] years), a 19% decrease in DSS score from a mean (SD) of 8.45 (0.67) to 6.82 (0.77) compared with baseline was observed after 2 weeks of treatment with cyclosporine lipogel, 2.0% w/w (P < .001; 95% CI, 13.77-24.51) in 59% of psoriasis lesional sites. At the end of the eighth week, a significant reduction (approximately 83%) in DSS was seen in all sites treated with cyclosporine lipogel, (P < .001; 95% CI, 77.48-88.22). At the end of the study period, complete clearance (ie, DSS = 0) was observed in 16 (41%) psoriasis lesional sites treated with cyclosporine lipogel, 85.7% of sites treated with clobetasol propionate cream, and none of the sites treated with conventional cyclosporine cream or placebo gel. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Topical liposomal formulation of cyclosporine, 2.0% w/w, is effective in treatment of limited chronic plaque psoriasis with a satisfactory safety profile. Future clinical trials should assess liposomal cyclosporine in larger study populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Registry-India Identifier: CTRI/2011/12/002307.

Presence of antidrug antibodies correlates inversely with the plasma tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α level and the efficacy of TNF-inhibitor therapy in psoriasis.

Antidrug antibodies have been shown to be associated with a loss of response during biologic therapy. Despite the potential association, there has been no report on the simultaneous monitoring of the following parameters in psoriasis: presence of neutralizing antibodies, plasma tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α concentration, TNFi concentration and disease activity. Plasma concentrations of adalimumab, infliximab, etanercept and their respective antidrug antibodies, as well as plasma concentrations of TNF-α were measured in 77 psoriasis patients receiving biologic therapy, and the values were correlated with the clinical activity of the skin disease. Antidrug antibodies were identified in the plasma of 25% of infliximab-treated patients and 29.6% of adalimumab-treated patients, but not in the etanercept group. Clinical severity scores were significantly higher in the antibody-positive patients. In patients receiving infliximab or adalimumab therapy, the presence of antidrug antibodies was directly associated with reduced plasma TNF-inhibitor concentration and elevated plasma TNF-α level.

Infliximab drug and antibody levels in patients with dermatological conditions.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, studies monitoring infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease have confirmed the relationship between the clinical response and the infliximab and anti-infliximab antibodies serum levels. However, there is only limited evidence in the field of dermatology. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish the correlation between plasma infliximab levels, the presence of anti-infliximab antibodies and the clinical response in dermatological conditions. SETTING: Retrospective observational study in a tertiary hospital (University Hospital of La Coruña, Spain). METHOD: Patients with dermatological conditions being treated with infliximab (5 mg/kg/8 weeks after the induction dose) were included in the study. The concentrations of infliximab and anti-infliximab antibodies were quantified by two sandwich-type ELISA immunoassays. The patients were classified into three groups based on the efficacy: good, partial or non-efficacy at the time of each blood assessment. The development of adverse reactions was also evaluated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Plasma levels of infliximab and anti-infliximab antibodies, clinical response and infusion reactions. RESULTS: 17 patients (45 assessments) were included. The good/partial efficacy rate was significantly higher in the case of >0.05 than <0.05 µg/mL infliximab concentration (93.3 vs. 40.0 %, p < 0.001). Anti-infliximab antibodies were only detected in five samples. Their presence was associated with a higher frequency of infusion reactions and a lower efficacy rate in comparison with the group without antiinfliximab antibodies (100.0 vs. 0.0 %, p < 0.001 and 0.0 vs. 85.0 %, p < 0.001 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained show that the presence of infliximab concentrations higher than 0.05 µg/mL are correlated with a good clinical response and the absence of toxicity. The incidence of anti-infliximab antibodies is low, although a correlation was observed between the presence of antibodies, absence of infliximab concentration, loss of clinical response and the development of infusion reactions.

Serum infliximab concentrations in psoriatic patients treated with infliximab: a systematic review.

The efficacy of infliximab is influenced by individual variability in its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Serum infliximab concentrations could therefore be related to the efficacy and tolerance of infliximab, and assist adjustment of treatment. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the value of measuring serum infliximab concentrations in psoriatic patients. A bibliographic search was performed on MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, LILACS for original studies on serum infliximab concentrations in psoriatic patients treated with infliximab. Ten articles were included, representing evaluation of serum infliximab concentrations in 733 patients. Predictive value of higher serum infliximab concentrations on long-term response maintenance was suggested in 3 studies. There was no information regarding the value of such measurements for adjustment of infliximab dosage. Trough serum infliximab concentrations that are at least detectable (>0.1 mg/L) at steady state (week 22) seem to be associated with maintaining a clinical response in the long term.

Influence of neutralizing antibodies to adalimumab and infliximab on the treatment of psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Current treatment with biologics has produced dramatic therapeutic effects in patients with psoriasis, although these agents occasionally decrease in efficacy. One of the main factors responsible for this attenuation is attributed to the development of antidrug antibodies (ADAs). OBJECTIVES: To analyse the relationship between serum drug concentrations, the presence of ADAs and treatment efficacy of adalimumab and infliximab, and to determine the optimal use of these biologics. METHODS: This was a 1-year prospective study in the dermatology departments of Kobe University Hospital and collaborating hospitals. All patients starting a regimen of adalimumab and infliximab for psoriasis were included. We measured the serum concentration of the drugs and titres of antibodies to adalimumab and infliximab, as well as the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores at weeks 0, 4, 12, 24 and 48 during the first year of treatment. RESULTS: We observed a 50% positive rate of ADAs to adalimumab, and a 41% positive rate of ADAs to infliximab. The titres of ADAs showed a wide range from low to high titres. In the high-titre groups, the patients exhibited a decreased clinical response, and demonstrated a negative correlation between titre and clinical response. However, an equivalent therapeutic effect was observed between the low-titre group and the group with no antibodies detected for adalimumab. For infliximab, the patients with ADAs showed decreased clinical response. An apparent negative correlation between antibody production and reduced clinical response was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Two biologics, adalimumab and infliximab, showed different therapeutic behaviour. The measurement of ADAs and drug concentrations has important implications for treatment with biologics.

Detection of fumarate-glutathione adducts in the portal vein blood of rats: evidence for rapid dimethylfumarate metabolism.

Dimethylfumarate (DMF), the essential ingredient of the drug product Fumaderm®, is used to treat psoriasis with a recognized favorable long-term safety profile. Interestingly, the mode of action and the pharmacokinetics of DMF in psoriasis or multiple sclerosis are not fully explored. It is known that DMF as an α,ß-unsaturated carboxylic acid ester forms an adduct with the antioxidant glutathione in vitro via a Michael-type addition within a very short period of time. In addition, it was shown that this reaction also takes place in vivo since the mercapturic acid of DMF was detected in urine of psoriasis patients after oral intake of Fumaderm®. To verify the hypothesis that DMF reacts with GSH already in or even before entering the portal vein blood an in vivo study in rats was initiated and portal vein blood was analyzed for the presence of DMF, MMF, GS-DMS and break down products, after DMF was given directly into the small intestine. The results show that no free DMF could be detected in the rat portal vein blood at any time point. MMF was the dominant metabolite and GS-DMS was also detectable in portal vein blood. In the rat mucosa the glutathione adducts of DMF and MMF were present. The data obtained provide evidence that the modulation of immune-mediated inflammatory pathways responsible for development of psoriasis and MS are targeted by DMF regulating redox-sensitive pathways for which the reaction with glutathione by DMF plays a crucial role.

Influence of alitretinoin on the pharmacokinetics of the oral contraceptive ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate.

BACKGROUND: Alitretinoin (9-cis retinoic acid) is currently registered in many European countries and in Canada as the only licensed treatment for severe chronic hand eczema unresponsive to potent topical corticosteroids. Alitretinoin, like all retinoids, is teratogenic, and women of child-bearing potential must strictly adhere to pregnancy-prevention measures. AIM: To investigate the influence of alitretinoin on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate (Ortho Tri-Cyclen 28(®)), a commonly prescribed combination oral contraceptive. METHODS: In total, 16 healthy premenopausal women received three consecutive cycles of the triphasic contraceptive ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate together with concomitant oral alitretinoin 40 mg once daily during cycle 2. Steady-state PK (noncompartmental analysis) of ethinyl estradiol, 17-deacetyl norgestimate, alitretinoin and its main metabolite 4-oxo-alitretinoin were assessed alone and in combination. RESULTS: The PK profiles of ethinyl estradiol and 17-deacetyl norgestimate were similar when contraceptives were given alone or with alitretinoin, and the area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve and the maximum concentration met the conventional criteria for PK equivalence. Similarly, the influence of ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate on systemic exposure to alitretinoin and 4-oxo-alitretinoin was not clinically relevant. Alitretinoin was well tolerated when given either alone or with ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate. CONCLUSIONS: There was no clinically relevant influence of alitretinoin on the PK of ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate, and no influence of ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate on systemic exposure to alitretinoin and 4-oxo-alitretinoin. Consequently, oral contraception with ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate is an appropriate primary method of birth control during alitretinoin treatment for women of childbearing potential.

Influence of food on the pharmacokinetics of oral alitretinoin (9-cis retinoic acid).

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that concomitant administration of food may enhance the bioavailability of oral retinoids. AIM: To assess the influence of food on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of alitretinoin after a single oral dose. METHODS: This was a single-dose, open-label, randomized, crossover study, which enrolled 30 healthy men, aged 18-44 years. Subjects received sequential doses of alitretinoin 40 mg either after fasting (treatment A) or 5 min after completion of a standard breakfast (treatment B), with the dosing sequence randomized (A/B or B/A). The washout period between the two doses was 1 week. Plasma concentrations over time were plotted and standard PK variables [area under the curve (AUC) of plasma concentration vs. time, maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), time to maximum plasma concentration (t(max)) and elimination half-life (t(1/2)] were determined. RESULTS: Drug exposure was markedly increased when alitretinoin was taken with food compared with fasting, and there were significant increases in mean C(max) (82.8 vs.25.4 ng/mL, respectively) and AUC (220.2 vs. 55.7 ng · h/mL). The delaying effect of food on t(max) was less marked (median of 3.0 vs. 2.0 h). Administration with food also increased exposure to drug metabolites. Variability in exposure was markedly reduced if alitretinoin was taken with vs. without food (percentage coefficient of variation 40% vs. 74% for AUC; 49% vs. 85% for C(max)). Alitretinoin was generally well tolerated, with typical retinoid adverse reactions, mostly comprising headache. CONCLUSIONS: Intake of alitretinoin with food substantially increased the bioavailability of alitretinoin, but variability in exposure was reduced. Consequently, oral alitretinoin should be taken with food as outlined in the manufacturer's summary of product characteristics.