RESUMO
Objective: To determine whether endometrial thickness (EMT) differs between i) clomiphene citrate (CC) and gonadotropin (Gn) utilizing patients as their own controls, and ii) patients who conceived with CC and those who did not. Furthermore, to investigate the association between late-follicular EMT and pregnancy outcomes, in CC and Gn cycles. Methods: Retrospective study. Three sets of analyses were conducted separately for the purpose of this study. In analysis 1, we included all cycles from women who initially underwent CC/IUI (CC1, n=1252), followed by Gn/IUI (Gn1, n=1307), to compare EMT differences between CC/IUI and Gn/IUI, utilizing women as their own controls. In analysis 2, we included all CC/IUI cycles (CC2, n=686) from women who eventually conceived with CC during the same study period, to evaluate EMT differences between patients who conceived with CC (CC2) and those who did not (CC1). In analysis 3, pregnancy outcomes among different EMT quartiles were evaluated in CC/IUI and Gn/IUI cycles, separately, to investigate the potential association between EMT and pregnancy outcomes. Results: In analysis 1, when CC1 was compared to Gn1 cycles, EMT was noted to be significantly thinner [Median (IQR): 6.8 (5.5-8.0) vs. 8.3 (7.0-10.0) mm, p<0.001]. Within-patient, CC1 compared to Gn1 EMT was on average 1.7mm thinner. Generalized linear mixed models, adjusted for confounders, revealed similar results (coefficient: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.52-1.85, CC1 as ref.). In analysis 2, CC1 was compared to CC2 EMT, the former being thinner both before [Median (IQR): 6.8 (5.5-8.0) vs. 7.2 (6.0-8.9) mm, p<0.001] and after adjustment (coefficient: 0.59, 95%CI: 0.34-0.85, CC1 as ref.). In analysis 3, clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs) and ongoing pregnancy rates (OPRs) improved as EMT quartiles increased (Q1 to Q4) among CC cycles (p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively), while no such trend was observed among Gn cycles (p=0.94, p=0.68, respectively). Generalized estimating equations models, adjusted for confounders, suggested that EMT was positively associated with CPR and OPR in CC cycles, but not in Gn cycles. Conclusions: Within-patient, CC generally resulted in thinner EMT compared to Gn. Thinner endometrium was associated with decreased OPR in CC cycles, while no such association was detected in Gn cycles.
Assuntos
Clomifeno , Endométrio , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina , Gonadotropinas , Inseminação Artificial , Humanos , Feminino , Clomifeno/uso terapêutico , Clomifeno/administração & dosagem , Endométrio/efeitos dos fármacos , Endométrio/patologia , Gravidez , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêutico , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/administração & dosagem , Resultado da Gravidez , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Taxa de Gravidez , Infertilidade Feminina/terapia , Infertilidade Feminina/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
The decrease in assisted reproductive technology success among older women, attributed to decreased oocyte quantity and quality, poses a significant challenge. Currently, no consensus on the optimal ovarian stimulation protocol for older women undergoing IVF exists. This retrospectively registered cohort study aimed to compare the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR), time to live birth (TTLB), and cost-effectiveness among women older than 35 years who were receiving either the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) or clomiphene citrate and gonadotropin cotreatment with ovarian stimulation (CC cotreatment) protocol. To compare treatment outcomes, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) on 2871 IVF cycles in women older than 35 years who received either the GnRHa or CC cotreatment protocol, resulting in 375 cycles in each group. Additionally, a decision tree model was utilized to assess the cost-effectiveness of the two protocols. Following PSM, both groups had similar baseline characteristics. The CC cotreatment protocol resulted in a greater rate of cycle cancellation (13.07% vs. 8.00%, p = 0.032), but the groups maintained comparable fertilization rates and embryo quality. Although the TTLB was longer in the CC cotreatment group, the CLBR per initial cycle (41.07% vs. 45.33%, p = 0.269) and delivery outcomes were similar between the two groups at the 24 months follow-up. Additionally, the average cost per live birth in the CC cotreatment group was 21.27% lower than in the GnRHa group (¥32,301.42 vs. ¥39,174.22). In conclusion, for women older than 35 years undergoing IVF, the CC cotreatment protocol offered a comparable CLBR to the GnRHa protocol but with reduced costs, indicating its potential as a viable and cost-effective ovarian stimulation option.Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/ , identifier [ChiCTR2300076537].
Assuntos
Clomifeno , Análise Custo-Benefício , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina , Nascido Vivo , Indução da Ovulação , Humanos , Feminino , Clomifeno/uso terapêutico , Clomifeno/economia , Clomifeno/administração & dosagem , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Adulto , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Indução da Ovulação/economia , Gravidez , Nascido Vivo/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Coeficiente de Natalidade , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Fertilização in vitro/economia , Gonadotropinas/uso terapêutico , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/economia , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêutico , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/administração & dosagem , Taxa de GravidezRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are usually selected to undergo an ovulation induction regimen or a programmed regimen for endometrial preparation in the frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) during their IVF/ICSI treatment. The programmed regimen permits flexible scheduling of embryo transfer but requires long-term usage of exogenous estrogen and higher dosages of luteal support while the letrozole ovulation regimen needs lower dosages of luteal support only. Recently, multiple studies have shown that the letrozole ovulation regimen can improve pregnancy outcomes of FET in women with PCOS compared with the programmed regimen. However, most of these studies are retrospective, and prospective studies are urgently needed the evidence from the perspective study is insufficient. METHODS/DESIGN: We are undertaking a multicentre, randomized, controlled clinical trial of an endometrial preparation regimen for FET in women with PCOS. The eligible women are randomly assigned to either the letrozole ovulation regimen or the programmed regimen for endometrial preparation. The primary outcome is the clinical pregnancy rate. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will provide evidence for whether the letrozole ovulation regimen for endometrial preparation could improve pregnancy outcomes in PCOS women undergoing FET. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200062244. Registered on 31 July 2022.
Assuntos
Transferência Embrionária , Letrozol , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Indução da Ovulação , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico , Taxa de Gravidez , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Humanos , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Letrozol/administração & dosagem , Gravidez , Transferência Embrionária/métodos , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Criopreservação , Resultado do Tratamento , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/administração & dosagem , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêutico , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/efeitos adversos , Ovulação/efeitos dos fármacos , China , Adulto , Infertilidade Feminina/terapiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine gynecological disease affecting many women of reproductive age. Clomiphene is the first-line treatment for PCOS patients, but most individuals may be resistant to it. This study aims to assess the efficacy of dexamethasone and clomiphene in the treatment of PCOS patients, and to provide a theoretical basis for clinicians to study and treat PCOS. METHODS: Chinese and English databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang Medical Network, and VIP Information Chinese Journal Service Platform (VIP) were searched from the inception to January 2023. Review Manager and Stata software were used for meta- analysis. The risk of bias of eligible studies were assessed using Cochrane's risk of bias tool. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots, Begg's and Egger's tests. RESULTS: A total of 12 literatures were finally included, with a total of 1270 PCOS patients. Compared with the control group, dexamethasone combined with clomiphene could significantly improve pregnancy (RR = 1.71, P < 0.00001), ovulation (RR = 1.30, P < 0.00001), luteinizing hormone level (SMD = -0.94, P < 0.00001), estradiol level (SMD = 0.99, P = 0.05), progesterone level (SMD = 5.08, P = 0.002) and testosterone level (SMD = -1.59, P < 0.00001). However, there were no significant effects on ovulation-stimulating hormone level (SMD = 0.15, P = 0.37), adverse reactions (RR = 1.30, P = 0.30), dizziness (RR = 1.50, P = 0.45), and vomiting (RR = 1.67, P = 0.48). CONCLUSION: The treatment of dexamethasone combined with clomiphene is helpful to improve the ovulation and pregnancy rate in patients with PCOS, and improve the hormone levels of patients.
Assuntos
Clomifeno , Dexametasona , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico , Humanos , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/tratamento farmacológico , Clomifeno/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêutico , Gravidez , Quimioterapia Combinada , Resultado do Tratamento , Taxa de GravidezAssuntos
Clomifeno , Endometriose , Letrozol , Nitrilas , Humanos , Feminino , Letrozol/uso terapêutico , Letrozol/administração & dosagem , Endometriose/tratamento farmacológico , Endometriose/cirurgia , Clomifeno/uso terapêutico , Nitrilas/uso terapêutico , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêutico , Triazóis/uso terapêutico , Triazóis/administração & dosagem , Superovulação , Inseminação Artificial/métodos , Inibidores da Aromatase/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Infertilidade Feminina/terapia , AdultoAssuntos
Clomifeno , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina , Inseminação Artificial , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico , Humanos , Feminino , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/terapia , Clomifeno/uso terapêutico , Clomifeno/administração & dosagem , Gravidez , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêutico , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/administração & dosagem , Inseminação Artificial/métodos , Infertilidade Feminina/terapia , Infertilidade Feminina/tratamento farmacológico , Coito , Taxa de Gravidez , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Indução da Ovulação/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Identify the most recent and significant evidence regarding the ovulation trigger within the framework of a multicycle approach through DuoStim, providing valuable insights for improving treatment strategies in patients with a poor prognosis. RECENT FINDINGS: The trigger method plays a pivotal role in optimizing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) stimulation, influencing oocyte retrieval and maturation rates, as well as follicle recruitment in consecutive ovarian stimulations such as double stimulation. Decision-making involves multiple factors and, while guidelines exist for conventional stimulation, specific recommendations for the multicycle approach are not well established. SUMMARY: The different methods for inducing oocyte maturation underscore the need for personalization of IVF protocols. The GnRH agonist trigger induces rapid luteolysis and establishes favorable hormonal conditions that do not adversely affect the recruitment of consecutive follicular waves in the context of DuoStim. It serves as a valid alternative to hCG in freeze-all cycles. This strategy might enhance the safety and flexibility of ovarian stimulations with no impact on oocyte competence and IVF efficacy.
Assuntos
Fertilização in vitro , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina , Recuperação de Oócitos , Indução da Ovulação , Humanos , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Feminino , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Recuperação de Oócitos/métodos , Gravidez , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêutico , Prognóstico , Pamoato de Triptorrelina/uso terapêutico , Taxa de Gravidez , Gonadotropina Coriônica/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
STUDY QUESTION: What are the potential risk factors for poor oocyte recuperation rate (ORR) and oocyte immaturity after GnRH agonist (GnRHa) ovulation triggering? SUMMARY ANSWER: Lower ovarian reserve and LH levels after GnRHa triggering are risk factors of poor ORR. Higher BMI and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels are risk factors of poor oocyte maturation rate (OMR). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The use of GnRHa to trigger ovulation is increasing. However, some patients may have a suboptimal response after GnRHa triggering. This suboptimal response can refer to any negative endpoint, such as suboptimal oocyte recovery, oocyte immaturity, or empty follicle syndrome. For some authors, a suboptimal response to GnRHa triggering refers to a suboptimal LH and/or progesterone level following triggering. Several studies have investigated a combination of demographic, clinical, and endocrine characteristics at different stages of the treatment process that may affect the efficacy of the GnRHa trigger and thus be involved in a poor endocrine response or efficiency but no consensus exists. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Bicentric retrospective cohort study between 2015 and 2021 (N = 1747). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: All patients aged 18-43 years who underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and ovulation triggering by GnRHa alone (triptorelin 0.2 mg) for ICSI or oocyte cryopreservation were included. The ORR was defined as the ratio of the total number of retrieved oocytes to the number of follicles >12 mm on the day of triggering. The OMR was defined as the ratio of the number of mature oocytes to the number of retrieved oocytes. A logistic regression model with a backward selection method was used for the analysis of risk factors. Odds ratios (OR) are displayed with their two-sided 95% confidence interval. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In the multivariate analysis, initial antral follicular count and LH level 12-h post-triggering were negatively associated with poor ORR (i.e. below the 10th percentile) (OR: 0.61 [95% CI: 0.42-0.88]; P = 0.008 and OR: 0.86 [95% CI: 0.76-0.97]; P = 0.02, respectively). A nonlinear relationship was found between LH level 12-h post-triggering and poor ORR, but no LH threshold was found. A total of 25.3% of patients suffered from oocyte immaturity (i.e. OMR < 75%). In the multivariate analysis, BMI and AMH levels were negatively associated with an OMR < 75% (OR: 4.34 [95% CI: 1.96-9.6]; P < 0.001 and OR: 1.22 [95% CI: 1.03-1.12]; P = 0.015, respectively). Antigonadotrophic pretreatment decreased the risk of OMR < 75% compared to no pretreatment (OR: 0.72 [95% CI: 0.57-0.91]; P = 0.02). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Our study is limited by its retrospective design and by the exclusion of patients who had hCG retriggers. However, this occurred in only six cycles. We were also not able to collect information on the duration of pretreatment and the duration of wash out period. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: In clinical practice, to avoid poor ORR, GnRHa trigger alone should not be considered in patients with higher BMI and/or low ovarian reserve, balanced by the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. In the case of a low 12-h post-triggering LH level, practicians must be aware of the risk of poor ORR, and hCG retriggering could be considered. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Assuntos
Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina , Recuperação de Oócitos , Oócitos , Reserva Ovariana , Indução da Ovulação , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Oócitos/efeitos dos fármacos , Fatores de Risco , Reserva Ovariana/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto Jovem , Hormônio Antimülleriano/sangue , Gravidez , Adolescente , Hormônio Luteinizante/sangue , Índice de Massa Corporal , Taxa de Gravidez , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
RATIONALE: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common reproductive endocrine disorder among women of childbearing age and is the primary cause of anovulatory infertility, accounting for 70% to 80% of cases. Ovulation induction is the main treatment approach for infertile patients with PCOS. Commonly utilized medications for this purpose are clomiphene citrate (CC) and letrozole (LE). Clomiphene citrate administration results in an ovulation rate ranging from 60% to 85%, while the pregnancy rate is limited to 35% to 40%, and a further reduction is observed in live birth rates. Letrozole demonstrates a slightly higher pregnancy rate and live birth rate compared to clomiphene citrate, although challenges persist in terms of longer stimulation cycles, multiple pregnancies, and the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Clinical reports indicate that acupuncture therapy shows promising efficacy in treating patients with PCOS-related infertility, despite a partially unclear understanding of its underlying mechanisms. PATIENT CONCERNS: In this study, one patient did not achieve pregnancy despite more than a year of ovulation induction using clomiphene citrate and letrozole. However, after 3 months of receiving cheek acupuncture therapy, she successfully conceived and gave birth to a liveborn baby. Another patient achieved natural conception and live birth after 2 months of exclusive cheek acupuncture therapy. DIAGNOSIS: PCOS. INTERVENTIONS: Cheek acupuncture therapy. OUTCOMES: Both of them successfully conceived and gave birth to a liveborn baby. LESSONS: These findings suggest that cheek acupuncture therapy can effectively stimulate follicle development and ovulation, potentially improving endometrial receptivity. According to holographic theory, there is a biologically holographic model within the cheek region that shares a homology with the human body structure. This model provides an explanation for the regulatory effects of cheek acupuncture point stimulation on the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Ovarian axis (HPO), which subsequently influences follicle development and ovulation in patients. Consequently, when cheek acupuncture therapy is applied alone or in combination with ovulation induction medication, patients have the ability to achieve successful pregnancy and experience a smooth delivery.
Assuntos
Terapia por Acupuntura , Infertilidade Feminina , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Infertilidade Feminina/terapia , Infertilidade Feminina/tratamento farmacológico , Letrozol/uso terapêutico , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/terapia , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/tratamento farmacológico , Bochecha , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêutico , Clomifeno/uso terapêutico , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Taxa de Gravidez , Terapia por Acupuntura/efeitos adversosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Results from previous studies examining the association between fertility treatment and borderline ovarian tumors are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between fertility treatment and borderline ovarian tumors in a cohort of infertile women. METHODS: This cohort study was based on the Danish Infertility Cohort and included all infertile women aged 20-45 years living in Denmark between 1 January 1995 and 31 December 2017 (n = 146,891). Information on use of fertility drugs, borderline ovarian tumors and cancer diagnoses, covariates, emigration, and vital status was obtained by linkage to national registers. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with adjustment for potential confounders for overall borderline ovarian tumors and for serous- and mucinous borderline ovarian tumors separately. RESULTS: During a median 11.3 years of follow-up, 144 women developed a borderline ovarian tumor. No marked associations between ever use of clomiphene citrate, gonadotropins, gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor modulators, human chorionic gonadotropin or progesterone and borderline ovarian tumors were observed, neither overall nor for serous and mucinous borderline ovarian tumors analysed separately. Further, no clear associations with borderline ovarian tumors were found according to cumulative dose, time since first use or parity status for any fertility drugs. CONCLUSIONS: No marked associations between use of fertility drugs and borderline ovarian tumors were observed. However, the cohort's relatively young age at end of follow-up emphasizes the importance of extending the follow-up period for women who have used fertility drugs.
Assuntos
Infertilidade Feminina , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Infertilidade Feminina/epidemiologia , Infertilidade Feminina/etiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêutico , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/efeitos adversos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/patologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of sublingually administered human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) in combination with clomiphene citrate (CC) or letrozole (LTZ) for ovulation induction. METHODS: In this prospective, double-blind, randomized study, the patients were divided into two placebo groups and two intervention groups using CC, LTZ, and HCG. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in ovulation induction between the groups. We compared endometrial thickness at the beginning of the cycle and during the pre-ovulatory period, and detected a moderately positive correlation when CC was administered with HCG. CONCLUSIONS: Sublingual HCG with CC caused a moderately positive correlation with endometrial thickening when compared with that at the beginning of the cycle and during the pre-ovulatory period. There was no significant change in the number of pre-ovulatory follicles.
Assuntos
Infertilidade Feminina , Feminino , Humanos , Gonadotropina Coriônica/uso terapêutico , Clomifeno/uso terapêutico , Clomifeno/farmacologia , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêutico , Infertilidade Feminina/etiologia , Letrozol , Nitrilas/farmacologia , Nitrilas/uso terapêutico , Indução da Ovulação/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Triazóis/farmacologia , Triazóis/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-CegoRESUMO
Clomiphene citrate (CC) and letrozole are the predominant medical interventions for the management of infertility in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). To comprehensively summarize the evidence, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was carried out to assess the effect of letrozole and CC on pregnancy outcomes in PCOS patients. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to January 2023. We included RCTs conducted on PCOS women comparing letrozole to CC and assessing endometrial thickness, the number and size of follicles, and ovulation and pregnancy rates. The endpoints were summarized as risk ratio (RR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model. Heterogeneity was examined using the I2 statistic. Fifty trials met our inclusion criteria. The mean endometrial thickness was significantly higher in the letrozole group compared to CC group (SMD: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.49, 1.28; I2=97.72%); however, the number of follicles was higher in the CC group (SMD: -0.56; 95% CI: -0.96, -0.17; I2=96.34%). Furthermore, letrozole intake induced higher ovulation rate (RR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.13, 1.26; I2=54.49%) and pregnancy rate (RR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.28, 1.62; I2=65.58%) compared to CC. Compared to CC, letrozole has a positive effect on endometrial thickness, monofollicular development, and ovulation and pregnancy rates suggesting that letrozole may be a strong alternative to CC as a first-line medical intervention for chronic anovulation in PCOS women. Larger studies are warranted to further clarify these findings.
Assuntos
Infertilidade Feminina , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Letrozol/uso terapêutico , Resultado da Gravidez , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/complicações , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêutico , Infertilidade Feminina/tratamento farmacológico , Coeficiente de Natalidade , Indução da Ovulação , Clomifeno/uso terapêutico , Taxa de GravidezRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the combination of clomiphene citrate (CC) and letrozole to that of CC alone in inducing ovulation in infertile women with ovulatory dysfunction. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at a single academic medical center between November 2020 and December 2021. Anovulatory infertility females, aged 18 to 40, were evenly distributed by a computer-generated block of four into two treatment groups. A "combination group" received a daily dose of CC (50 mg) and letrozole (2.5 mg), while a "CC-alone group" received a daily dose of CC alone (50 mg). The study medications were administered on days 3 through 7 of menstrual cycle. The primary outcome was the ovulation rate, defined by serum progesterone levels exceeding 3 ng/mL at the mid-luteal phase. The secondary outcomes were ovulation induction cycle characteristics, endometrial thickness, conception rate, and adverse events. RESULTS: One hundred women (50 per group) were enrolled in the study. The mean age was not significantly different in both groups: 31.8 years in the combination group and 32.4 years in the CC-alone groups (P = 0.54). The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in the combination and CC-alone groups was 48% and 44%, respectively (P = 0.841). According to intention-to-treat analysis, the ovulation rates were 78% and 70% in the combination and CC-alone groups, respectively (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the mean endometrial thickness or the number of dominant follicles of the groups. No serious adverse events were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found no significant difference between the combination of CC and letrozole and CC alone in inducing ovulation in infertile women with ovulatory dysfunction in one cycle. The small number of live births precluded any meaningful statistical analysis. Further studies are needed to validate and extend our findings beyond the scope of the current study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org with the following number: TCTR20201108004 and was approved on 08/11/2020.
Assuntos
Infertilidade Feminina , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Letrozol/uso terapêutico , Infertilidade Feminina/tratamento farmacológico , Infertilidade Feminina/etiologia , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêutico , Taxa de Gravidez , Clomifeno/uso terapêutico , Indução da Ovulação , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/complicações , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/tratamento farmacológico , Nascido VivoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: There was also a lack of data regarding the effect of follicle size, endometrial thickness, and ovarian stimulation as predictors of intrauterine insemination (IUI) success rate in Indonesia, especially in the Aster Clinic and Bandung Fertility Centre. This study was performed to explore the relationship between follicle size, endometrial thickness, and types of ovarian stimulation (Clomiphene citrate/CC vs Letrozole) with biochemical pregnancy rate in women undergone IUI. We performed a case-control study in 122 women aged 20-40 years with unexplained infertility who had completed the IUI program for a maximum of three cycles. Data were extracted from medical records. Independent T-test and multivariate analyses were used to analyse the difference between variables using IBM SPSS 24.0. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULT: Follicle sizes of 18-22 mm in both Clomiphene citrate (CC) and Letrozole groups were shown to increase biochemical pregnancy rate (P = 0.001). There is no relationship between endometrial thickness and pregnancy rate. Biochemical pregnancy rate in women using Letrozole was 1.513 times higher than women using CC. The follicle size of 18-22 mm and using Letrozole rather than CC as ovarian stimulators are predictive factors associated with a higher pregnancy rate in women undergone IUI.
Assuntos
Infertilidade Feminina , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Letrozol , Taxa de Gravidez , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Infertilidade Feminina/terapia , Nitrilas , Triazóis , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêutico , Clomifeno , Indução da Ovulação , Inseminação ArtificialRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In vitro fertilisation (IVF) is a treatment for unexplained subfertility but is invasive, expensive, and associated with risks. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of IVF versus expectant management, unstimulated intrauterine insemination (IUI), and IUI with ovarian stimulation using gonadotropins, clomiphene citrate (CC), or letrozole in improving pregnancy outcomes. SEARCH METHODS: We searched following databases from inception to November 2021, with no language restriction: Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL. We searched reference lists of articles and conference abstracts. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing effectiveness of IVF for unexplained subfertility with expectant management, unstimulated IUI, and stimulated IUI. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We followed standard Cochrane methods. MAIN RESULTS: IVF versus expectant management (two RCTs) We are uncertain whether IVF improves live birth rate (LBR) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) compared to expectant management (odds ratio (OR) 22.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.56 to 189.37; 1 RCT; 51 women; very low-quality evidence; OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.07 to 9.8; 2 RCTs; 86 women; I2 = 80%; very low-quality evidence). Adverse effects were not reported. Assuming 4% LBR and 12% CPR with expectant management, these would be 8.8% to 9% and 13% to 58% with IVF. IVF versus unstimulated IUI (two RCTs) IVF may improve LBR compared to unstimulated IUI (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.19 to 5.12; 2 RCTs; 156 women; I2 = 60%; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain whether there is a difference between IVF and IUI for multiple pregnancy rate (MPR) (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.04 to 27.29; 1 RCT; 43 women; very low-quality evidence) and miscarriage rate (OR 1.72, 95% CI 0.14 to 21.25; 1 RCT; 43 women; very low-quality evidence). No study reported ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Assuming 16% LBR, 3% MPR, and 6% miscarriage rate with unstimulated IUI, these outcomes would be 18.5% to 49%, 0.1% to 46%, and 0.9% to 58% with IVF. IVF versus IUI + ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins (6 RCTs), CC (1 RCT), or letrozole (no RCTs) Stratified analysis was based on pretreatment status. Treatment-naive women There may be little or no difference in LBR between IVF and IUI + gonadotropins (1 IVF to 2 to 3 IUI cycles: OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.61; 3 RCTs; 731 women; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence; 1 IVF to 1 IUI cycle: OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.92; 2 RCTs; 221 women; I2 = 54%; low-quality evidence); or between IVF and IUI + CC (OR 2.51, 95% CI 0.96 to 6.55; 1 RCT; 103 women; low-quality evidence). Assuming 42% LBR with IUI + gonadotropins (1 IVF to 2 to 3 IUI cycles) and 26% LBR with IUI + gonadotropins (1 IVF to 1 IUI cycle), LBR would be 39% to 54% and 24% to 51% with IVF. Assuming 15% LBR with IUI + CC, LBR would be 15% to 54% with IVF. There may be little or no difference in CPR between IVF and IUI + gonadotropins (1 IVF to 2 to 3 IUI cycles: OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.59; 3 RCTs; 731 women; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence; 1 IVF to 1 IUI cycle: OR 4.59, 95% CI 1.86 to 11.35; 1 RCT; 103 women; low-quality evidence); or between IVF and IUI + CC (OR 3.58, 95% CI 1.51 to 8.49; 1 RCT; 103 women; low-quality evidence). Assuming 48% CPR with IUI + gonadotropins (1 IVF to 2 to 3 IUI cycles) and 17% with IUI + gonadotropins (1 IVF to 1 IUI cycle), CPR would be 44% to 60% and 28% to 70% with IVF. Assuming 21% CPR with IUI + CC, CPR would be 29% to 69% with IVF. There may be little or no difference in multiple pregnancy rate (MPR) between IVF and IUI + gonadotropins (1 IVF to 2 to 3 IUI cycles: OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.77; 3 RCTs; 731 women; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence; 1 IVF to 1 IUI cycle: OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.58; 2 RCTs; 221 women; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence); or between IVF and IUI + CC (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.17 to 2.41; 1 RCT; 102 women; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain if there is a difference in OHSS between IVF and IUI + gonadotropins with 1 IVF to 2 to 3 IUI cycles (OR 6.86, 95% CI 0.35 to 134.59; 1 RCT; 207 women; very low-quality evidence); and there may be little or no difference in OHSS with 1 IVF to 1 IUI cycle (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.36 to 4.16; 2 RCTs; 221 women; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence). There may be little or no difference between IVF and IUI + CC (OR 1.53, 95% CI 0.24 to 9.57; 1 RCT; 102 women; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain if there is a difference in miscarriage rate between IVF and IUI + gonadotropins with 1 IVF to 2 to 3 IUI cycles (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.03 to 3.04; 1 RCT; 207 women; very low-quality evidence); and there may be little or no difference with 1 IVF to 1 IUI cycle (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.44 to 3.02; 1 RCT; 103 women; low-quality evidence). There may be little or no difference between IVF and IUI + CC (OR 1.48, 95% CI 0.54 to 4.05; 1 RCT; 102 women; low-quality evidence). In women pretreated with IUI + CC IVF may improve LBR compared with IUI + gonadotropins (OR 3.90, 95% CI 2.32 to 6.57; 1 RCT; 280 women; low-quality evidence). Assuming 22% LBR with IUI + gonadotropins, LBR would be 39% to 65% with IVF. IVF may improve CPR compared with IUI + gonadotropins (OR 14.13, 95% CI 7.57 to 26.38; 1 RCT; 280 women; low-quality evidence). Assuming 30% CPR with IUI + gonadotropins, CPR would be 76% to 92% with IVF. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: IVF may improve LBR over unstimulated IUI. Data should be interpreted with caution as overall evidence quality was low.
Assuntos
Aborto Espontâneo , Infertilidade , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Letrozol , Aborto Espontâneo/epidemiologia , Inseminação Artificial/efeitos adversos , Inseminação Artificial/métodos , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêutico , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Infertilidade/tratamento farmacológico , Infertilidade/etiologia , Clomifeno/uso terapêutico , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Gonadotropinas/uso terapêutico , Taxa de Gravidez , Nascido VivoRESUMO
A total of 136 patients with PCOS were followed through the Department of the Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Unit-IV, Lady Aitchison Hospital, Lahore. Patients were randomly divided by lottery method into two groups i.e., Group-A (CoQ10 plus Clomiphene citrate) and Group-B (Clomiphene citrate alone). The selected patients in the study group (group-A) were given Clomiphene citrate 100mg/day from cycle days 2-6 for 45 days (2 cycles) and CoQ10 in a dose of 50mg soft gel capsules thrice per day starting at cycle day-2, until HCG administration. Patients in controlled group (group 21 B) received Clomiphene citrate 100mg/day twice a day cycle for 45 days. Data were analysed in SPSS v25.0. In group-A (CoQ10 plus Clomiphene citrate), successful ovulation induction was noted in 16 (23.5%) patients, showing that with the addition of CoQ10, the chances of ovulation induction increased.
Assuntos
Infertilidade Feminina , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/complicações , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/tratamento farmacológico , Clomifeno/uso terapêutico , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Ubiquinona/uso terapêutico , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêutico , Infertilidade Feminina/tratamento farmacológico , Infertilidade Feminina/etiologiaRESUMO
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is characterized by menstrual irregularities, high androgen levels, and ovarian cysts. Clomiphene citrate (Clomid) and letrozole have both been investigated as ovulation induction therapies for PCOS. This interventional study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of a stairstep practice of letrozole versus clomiphene citrate in women with PCOS. A total of 100 women diagnosed with PCOS and infertility participated in the study, which took place from March 2021 to July 2022 at the Maternity and Children Teaching Hospital in Adiwaniyah Province, Iraq. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups (each with 50 women): the first group received clomiphene citrate in a stair step pattern (single dose of 50 mg, 100 mg, and 150 mg) for five days, for a maximum of three cycles; the second group received letrozole in a stair step pattern (single dose of 2.5, 5, and 7.5 mg) for five days, for a maximum of three cycles. Follicle size was monitored using ultrasound to achieve a follicle size >18 mm. The ovulation rate was higher in the letrozole group (86.0%) compared to the clomiphene citrate group (72.0%), although the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.086). The pregnancy rate was slightly higher in the letrozole group (22.0% vs 18.0%), but also not statistically significant (p=0.617). However, the mean time from menstruation to ovulation was significantly shorter in the letrozole group (17.20±1.32 days) compared to the clomiphene citrate group (24.08 ± 1.56 days, p<0.001). There were no significant differences in common side effects between the two groups. Overall, letrozole was found to be as safe as clomiphene citrate but demonstrated a shorter time to ovulation. Further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to validate these findings and determine their clinical implications.
Assuntos
Infertilidade Feminina , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Clomifeno/uso terapêutico , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêutico , Infertilidade Feminina/tratamento farmacológico , Infertilidade Feminina/etiologia , Letrozol/uso terapêutico , Nitrilas/uso terapêutico , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/tratamento farmacológico , Triazóis/efeitos adversosRESUMO
The purpose of this research was to evaluate the efficacy of 3 ovulation induction therapies for treating infertility in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). In this retrospective study, we compared the success rates of 90 patients who underwent intrauterine insemination, who were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: letrozole (LE) + urinary gonadotropin (human menopausal gonadotropin [HMG]), clomiphene (CC) + HMG, or HMG alone. Using ultrasound scanning, we examined the number of mature follicles, ovulation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, endometrial thickness, and blood flow. When compared to the other 2 groups, the LE + HMG group had significantly higher levels of mature follicles, ovulation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, estradiol, and luteinizing hormone on the day of the human chorionic gonadotropin injection and endometrial receptivity (P < .05). There was no statistically significant difference between the 3 groups in terms of abortion rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, or adverse reactions. In this research, we found that infertility in patients with PCOS could be effectively treated by combining LE with HMG. This protocol increased ovulation, boosted fertility, and enhanced endometrial receptivity with no increase in adverse reactions. Therefore, it may be a useful clinical approach for inducing ovulation and treating infertility in patients with PCOS.
Assuntos
Infertilidade Feminina , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/tratamento farmacológico , Infertilidade Feminina/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Letrozol/uso terapêutico , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Menotropinas/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Clinical efficacy of Fuke Qianjin tablets combined with clomiphene citrate on infertility patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) was expected to be retrospectively analyzed in this study. METHODS: In this paper, 100 infertility patients with PCOS were selected and divided into the observation and control groups based on different medications. Firstly, clinical data of both groups of patients were acquired. Then, the uterine receptivity and ovarian status, the levels of sex hormones, inflammation and oxidative stress, and the pregnancy outcomes between the 2 groups were compared and analyzed before and after treatment. RESULTS: After a variety of comparisons and analyses, Fuke Qianjin tablets combined with clomiphene citrate were confirmed to improve the uterine receptivity and ovarian status, levels of sex hormone, inflammation and oxidative stress, and pregnancy outcomes in infertility patients with PCOS. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, Fuke Qianjin tabletsâ +â clomiphene citrate treatment shows good clinical efficacy and is worth promotion in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Infertilidade Feminina , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/complicações , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Indução da Ovulação , Clomifeno/uso terapêutico , Infertilidade Feminina/tratamento farmacológico , Infertilidade Feminina/etiologia , Inflamação/tratamento farmacológico , Comprimidos , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to determine the impact of using sildenafil citrate as an adjuvant with clomiphene citrate (CC) in the treatment of women with unexplained infertility. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 130 women with unexplained infertility were enrolled in a prospective randomized study. After dividing into two groups, all patients received CC 50 mg-BD from the 2nd to the 7th day of the cycle. Oral sildenafil citrate 20 mg was given BD to the study group from the end of menstruation till ovulation. A transvaginal ultrasound was carried out for all patients to assess ovulation, number of follicles, and endometrial thickness (ET). The beta-hCG blood test was used to determine pregnancy two weeks after ovulation followed by an ultrasound to confirm viability. Adverse effects were recorded and miscarriage, ectopic, and multi-fetal pregnancy were followed up for twelve weeks. RESULTS: Median ET in the study group was 8 mm compared to 7 mm in the control group (p<0.01). The number of pregnancies increased in the study group but with no significant difference. The median ET was greater in the study group with an infertility duration of less than 2 years. Headache was the most significant adverse effect in the study group (9.2% vs. 1.5%, p=0.052). CONCLUSIONS: Adding sildenafil citrate to CC is a good choice for overcoming the antiestrogenic action of CC and improving ET in women with unexplained infertility, especially in those with less than 2 years of infertility.