The Pharyngostomy Tube: Indications, Technique, Efficacy, and Safety in Modern Surgical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Long-term nasogastric tubes are uncomfortable and associated with complications such as impairment with speech and swallowing, septum trauma, epistaxis, alar necrosis, and intubation of the trachea among others. Pharyngostomy tubes (PTs) are an alternative for prolonged enteral feeding, transluminal drainage of collections, and gastric decompression in patients with an intestinal obstruction and an inoperable abdomen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of patients who had a PT placed at our institution from May 2005 to March 2015. The primary end point of the study was to establish the type and rate of complications and aspiration events related to PT use. RESULTS: During the specified period, a total of 84 PTs were placed. The most common indication for PT placement was enteric decompression in 65 (77.4%), followed by transluminal collection drainage in 12 (14.3%), and enteral access for nutrition in 7 (8.3%) patients. The mean time to tube removal was 17.8 days ± 17.1 (range, 2-119). We encountered 10 (11.2%) complications related to PT placement, including 7 cases of cellulitis, 2 superficial abscesses, and 1 patient with pharyngeal hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: PTs are a relatively simple, safe, and straightforward approach to achieve long-term enteral decompression, access for feeding or transluminal drainage, avoiding the complications associated with prolonged nasogastric tube placement. The complication rate is low and patient satisfaction and compliance appear to be higher than with nasogastric tubes. Modern surgeons should be familiar with the procedure and technique. PTs should be part of every surgeon's armamentarium.

A novel surgical method of managing a high output pharyngostome.

Pharyngocutaneous fistulas following large oncological surgical resection of the upper aerodigestive tract are common and typically heal over a number of weeks. A pharyngostome is a surgically created non-healing opening into the pharynx, which is far less common and often difficult to manage.

Tube pharyngostomy--a useful alternative for long-term enteric decompression or enteral feeding.

The tube pharyngostomy has been all but forgotten in recent years, and rightfully so when a PEG or PEJ is possible. Nevertheless, the tube pharyngostomy should remain in the armamentarium of the GI surgeon for selected patients in whom longer term enteral access is not available by PEG or PEJ for various technical reasons, for those who absolutely refuse a nasoenteric tube, or as terminal palliation in patients with nonoperable but obstructing intra-abdominal neoplasms. Not only is it easy to place (albeit requiring a brief general anesthetic), but these tubes are much more comfortable than the "misery" to the patient of a nasoenteric tube by avoiding the annoying nasal and nasopharyngeal irritation,sinusitis, trouble with speech and coughing, and general discomfort of a longer term, indwelling nasoenteric tube. Moreover, the tube can be hidden under a turtleneck-types weater, thereby avoiding the social discomfort of a tube exiting the nares. The overall lack of experience and ignorance, not only with these tubes but also with their concept, has precluded many surgeons from recognizing their usefulness,albeit in highly selected patients. With these advantages and caveats in mind, the tube pharyngostomy can prove a valuable adjunct in selected patients.

Does the patch fit the stoma? A study on peristoma geometry and patch use in laryngectomized patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the geometry of (peri)stomas of laryngectomized patients in relation to patch use. This data will enable improvement of tracheostoma interfaces, specifically addressing patients currently unable to use stoma patches. The low use of Heat-and-Moisture-Exchange (HME) filters and (hands-free) speech valves, although very important to the quality of life of laryngectomized patients, is mainly attributed to poor fit of the adhesive patches to the stoma site. Current patch shapes are not based upon an objective (peri)stoma geometry because this geometry is unknown. DESIGN: Observational anthropometric study of the (peri)stoma of laryngectomized patients. SETTING: Ten hospitals or institutes in eight countries. PARTICIPANTS: About 191 laryngectomized patients, at least 1 year post operative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (Peri)stomas were photographed and measured. Patients completed a questionnaire on patch-use. Concavity of commercially available patches was measured. RESULTS: In countries with a financial reimbursement system 58% of the patients use patches, compares to only 9% in other countries. Patches stay in situ for an average of 33.3 h. Patch and non-patch users differ on five out of ten measured geometrical parameters. Most striking differences are that patch users have much shallower peristomas (13 versus 18 mm), and stomas far more parallel to the anterior neck plane. The deepest commercially available patch is only 7 mm deep. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides detailed (peri)stoma geometry data of a divers population, and for the first time in relation to patch-use. It reveals a serious mismatch between patients and patches. With these data new patches can be developed that could dramatically improve rehabilitation after laryngectomy.

Pharyngostomy tubes for gastric conduit decompression.

OBJECTIVE: This article illustrates our operative technique for pharyngostomy tube placement and describes our clinical experience with pharyngostomy use for gastric conduit decompression after esophagectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing pharyngostomy tube placement for gastric conduit decompression after esophagectomy from January 2008 to August 2009. Patients were included if they had a pharyngostomy tube placed at esophagectomy (prophylactic placement) or as a means of decompression after postesophagectomy anastomotic leak (therapeutic placement). We collected operative and clinical data and performed a descriptive statistical analysis. RESULTS: We placed 25 pharyngostomy tubes for gastric conduit decompression after esophagectomy. Eleven were placed prophylactically (44%); the remaining 14 were placed therapeutically (56%) after anastomotic leak. Prophylactic pharyngostomy tubes remained in place a median of 8 days (range 4-17 days), whereas therapeutic pharyngostomy tubes were left in place a median of 15 days (range 7-125 days). There were 4 infectious complications (16%) unrelated to length of pharyngostomy use: 2 cases of cellulitis (resolved with antibiotics, tube remaining in place) and 2 superficial abscesses after tube removal requiring bedside débridement. Seventy-two percent of patients underwent swallow evaluation; 22% of these patients had radiographic evidence of aspiration. CONCLUSIONS: Pharyngostomy tube placement for gastric conduit decompression after esophagectomy is simple, and tubes can stay in place for prolonged periods. Our experience suggests that pharyngostomy tubes are a safe alternative to nasogastric drainage.

Percutaneous cervical pharyngostomy: a traditional technique revisited.

Enteral tube feeding is widely used in intensive care units, high dependency units and general wards. In some patients, an adequate intake is not maintained because patients cannot tolerate the tube. Insertion of an enteral feeding tube via a pharyngostomy is simple and potentially more easily tolerated. We describe our experience with three critically ill patients, using disposable vascular access equipment and a dilational technique. All three patients received markedly increased nutrition, but one patient suffered haemorrhagic complications.

Percutaneous pharyngostomy versus gastric tube placement in head injured patients. A prospective comparative study of 50 patients.

The author reports a prospective comparative study in two groups of patients with head injuries where the complications of conventional nasal placement of nasogastric tubes are compared to placement by pharyngostomy. Percutaneous pharyngostomy is a simple procedure that eliminates some of the complications associated with the use of nasogastric tubes. It has particular advantages in patients with maxillofacial- and skull base injuries, is well tolerated in patients with a depressed level of consciousness and eliminates some of the infective complications associated with the use of nasogastric tubes.

Complications of pharyngostomy.

An account is given of a fatal complication following the use of a pharyngostomy feeding tube. The literature on this topic is reviewed with regard to complications. Of the 671 patients that have been reported previously there have been no fatal or serious complications and minor complications were reported in only 42 patients. We regard the technique of pharyngostomy to be safe but recommendations are made to avoid the complication reported here.