Review article: Optimisation of biologic (monoclonal antibody) therapeutic response in inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: There are a plethora of therapeutic options for the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Despite this, clinical outcomes with standard dosing often fall short of established targets. While efforts centre on developing novel therapies, there is an ongoing need to optimise the use of existing agents. AIMS: To focus on strategies to optimise response to biologic (monoclonal antibody) therapies in IBD, including use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). METHODS: An extensive review of the published literature. RESULTS: TDM is a strategy aimed at enhancing the effectiveness of drugs with variable exposure-response relationships by measuring serum concentrations of biologic therapies and detecting neutralising antibodies. Reactive TDM is performed when therapeutic goals have not been achieved. Tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF) inhibitors are the treatment class most frequently associated with immunogenicity and loss of response. Immunogenicity can be reduced through avoidance of low serum drug concentrations by dose optimisation or use of concomitant immunomodulator therapy. Subtherapeutic dosing in the absence of antidrug antibodies is best managed by dose escalation or dose interval reduction. Persistent neutralising drug antibodies necessitate switching to an alternative therapy. Proactively ensuring adequate serum trough levels might help sustain treatment durability and prevent loss of response. Newer non-TNF inhibitors demonstrate less robust exposure-response relationships, and TDM may not prove as beneficial. CONCLUSIONS: In the treat-to-target paradigm of IBD treatment, optimising treatment effect with dose optimisation, which may involve strategies including TDM, increases the likelihood of achieving clinical remission and may accomplish deeper levels of remission beyond symptom control.

TNF-α inhibitors for type 1 diabetes: exploring the path to a pivotal clinical trial.

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the destruction of insulin-producing ß-cells in the pancreas. This destruction leads to chronic hyperglycemia, necessitating lifelong insulin therapy to manage blood glucose levels. Typically diagnosed in children and young adults, T1D can, however, occur at any age. Ongoing research aims to uncover the precise mechanisms underlying T1D and to develop potential interventions. These include efforts to modulate the immune system, regenerate ß-cells, and create advanced insulin delivery systems. Emerging therapies, such as closed-loop insulin pumps, stem cell-derived ß-cell replacement and disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), offer hope for improving the quality of life for individuals with T1D and potentially moving towards a cure. Currently, there are no disease-modifying therapies approved for stage 3 T1D. Preserving ß-cell function in stage 3 T1D is associated with better clinical outcomes, including lower HbA1c and decreased risk of hypoglycemia, neuropathy, and retinopathy. Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy at preserving ß-cell function by measurement of C-peptide in two clinical trials in people with stage 3 T1D. However, TNF-α inhibitors have yet to be evaluated in a pivotal trial for T1D. To address the promising clinical findings of TNF-α inhibitors in T1D, Breakthrough T1D convened a panel of key opinion leaders (KOLs) in the field. The workshop aimed to outline an optimal clinical path for moving TNF-α inhibitors to a pivotal clinical trial in T1D. Here, we summarize the evidence for the beneficial use of TNF-α inhibitors in T1D and considerations for strategies collectively identified to advance TNF-α inhibitors beyond phase 2 clinical studies for stage 3 T1D.

Is therapeutic drug monitoring a dancing partner for TNF-α inhibitors in real-world practice? Answers from an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This systematic review aimed to determine the effect of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNF-αI) in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) based on real-world evidence, as results from published meta-analyses based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may not fully capture the nuances of clinical practice due to strict criteria. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to 1 August 2023. Cohort studies comparing TDM (proactive and reactive) with empirical management were included. Primary outcome was effectiveness [for IBDs: clinical remission; for rheumatic diseases: clinical remission or low disease activity], with certainty of evidence appraised using the GRADE approach. Secondary outcomes included treatment failure, serious adverse events (SAEs), IMIDs-related surgeries or hospitalizations, and anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) development risk. RESULTS: Twenty-four cohort studies were included and almost all were on infliximab. For IBDs, compared with empirical management, proactive TDM significantly improved clinical remission (RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.04-1.28), reduced IBDs-related surgeries (RR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.26-0.81), hospitalizations (RR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.43-0.83), SAEs (RR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.07-0.76), and ADAs development risk (RR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.19-0.60). Reactive TDM significantly lowered hospitalization rates and might be cost-effective. Proactive TDM outperformed reactive TDM in secondary outcomes. For rheumatic diseases, benefits of TDM were inconclusive due to limited evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world evidence supports proactive TDM of TNF-αI (particularly infliximab) in IBDs to improve effectiveness, safety, and immunogenicity. However, benefits of TDM for different TNF-αI in other IMIDs remain uncertain. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: www.crd.york.ac.uk/ PROSPERO identifier is CRD42022370846.

Cycling versus swapping strategies with TNF-α inhibitors and IL-17 inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis in clinical practice.

The availability of a number of bDMARDs with different mechanism of action increases potential treatment pathways in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). In clinical practice, following the failure of one bDMARD, it is normal to consider which options are the best for switching strategy. In most cases this choice involves IL17i and TNFi. The main aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of cycling (from TNFi to another TNFi) and swapping (from TNFi to IL17i or vice versa) strategies. In this monocentric retrospective observational study, all PsA patients treated with TNFi or IL17i between January 2016 and January 2022 were enrolled. The prescriptions were clustered in one cycling group (CG), and two swap groups: from TNFi to IL17i (SG1) and from IL17i to TNFi (SG2). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models were applied to compare the drug retention rates and to identify factors affecting treatment persistence. A total of 122 patients were enrolled. The CG, SG1 and SG2 2-years retention rates were 51%, 58% and 34% (p = 0.1), respectively. SG1 strategy (HR 0.53; CI 0.31-0.89; p = 0.02), age (HR 0.98; CI 0.96-0.99; p = 0.003), Disease Activity PsA (HR 1.11; CI 1.08-1.13; p < 0.0001), year of switch (HR 1.78; CI 1.39-2.22; p < 0.0001) influenced the retention rate. The findings of this real-world study, even if burdened by bias related to its observational nature, support the hypothesis that in PsA patients swapping from TNFi to IL17i might be more effective than cycling TNFis.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ART-648, a PDE4 inhibitor in healthy subjects: A randomized, placebo-controlled phase I study.

Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor is associated with a broad-spectrum anti-inflammatory mechanism. However, securing clinically efficacious doses with sufficient safety margins remains challenging due to class specific adverse events that are often unavoidable in the clinic. ART-648 is an orally available PDE4 inhibitor being developed for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. According to the estimated clinical doses based on an in vitro whole-blood assay, a phase I study was designed. The purpose of this phase I study was to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) following single and multiple administration of ART-648 in healthy subjects. PD was assessed by suppression of lipopolysaccharide-induced TNFα release in ex vivo whole-blood assay. In the single rising dose study, ART-648 was safe and well tolerated with a dose-proportional increase in exposures up to 4 mg. Single doses of ART-648 demonstrated dose-dependent PD response, indicating target engagement at 2-8 mg doses. In the multiple rising dose study, doses up to 4 mg BID after careful titration were well tolerated, while doses up to 6 mg BID were tolerated not in all but the majority of subjects. In conclusion, ART-648 exhibits a favorable PK profile with robust target engagement at clinically safe and tolerated doses identified in healthy subjects.

An Uncommon Overlap Syndrome Between Ankylosing Spondylitis and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis-Case Report.

This case report describes an uncommon overlap syndrome between ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Initially, the patient was diagnosed with AS, for which he received various specific treatments, including TNF-α inhibitors. After five years of treatment with TNF-α inhibitor etanercept, the patient was referred for a full neurological assessment after he reported balance disturbances, postural instability, muscle weakness, and other neurological symptoms that indicated the presence of a neurological disorder. After a thorough investigation, the patient was diagnosed with ALS. This case report aims to contribute to the limited literature by providing a detailed case study regarding the crosstalk between AS and ALS while also exploring the potential underlying mechanisms and the possible link between TNF-α inhibitors therapy and ALS.

A longitudinal single-cell atlas of anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment in inflammatory bowel disease.

Precision medicine in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) requires a cellular understanding of treatment response. We describe a therapeutic atlas for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) following adalimumab, an anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment. We generated ~1 million single-cell transcriptomes, organised into 109 cell states, from 216 gut biopsies (41 subjects), revealing disease-specific differences. A systems biology-spatial analysis identified granuloma signatures in CD and interferon (IFN)-response signatures localising to T cell aggregates and epithelial damage in CD and UC. Pretreatment differences in epithelial and myeloid compartments were associated with remission outcomes in both diseases. Longitudinal comparisons demonstrated disease progression in nonremission: myeloid and T cell perturbations in CD and increased multi-cellular IFN signalling in UC. IFN signalling was also observed in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) synovium with a lymphoid pathotype. Our therapeutic atlas represents the largest cellular census of perturbation with the most common biologic treatment, anti-TNF, across multiple inflammatory diseases.

Case report: Breaking CNS immuno-privilege: TNFα-inhibitor triggers aseptic meningitis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis.

Blood-brain barrier dysfunction might be driven by peripheral inflammation. TNFα inhibitors (TNF-αi) are occasionally associated with a wide spectrum of neurological immuno-mediated disorders. However, patients with systemic autoimmune disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), might be prone to develop further organ-specific, including central nervous system (CNS), autoimmunity. Here we report the case of a patient, affected by RA and treated with etanercept, who suddenly developed focal neurological symptoms. Cerebrospinal fluid, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI findings are reported and support the diagnosis of TNF-αi -associated aseptic meningitis.

Interleukin-receptor antagonist and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors for the primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases.

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ACVD) is worsened by chronic inflammatory diseases. Interleukin receptor antagonists (IL-RAs) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF) inhibitors have been studied to see if they can prevent cardiovascular events. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical benefits and harms of IL-RAs and TNF inhibitors in the primary and secondary prevention of ACVD. SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Heart Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Ovid MEDLINE (including In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations), Ovid Embase, EBSCO CINAHL plus, and clinical trial registries for ongoing and unpublished studies were searched in February 2024. The reference lists of relevant studies, reviews, meta-analyses and health technology reports were searched to identify additional studies. No limitations on language, date of publication or study type were set. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs that recruited people with and without pre-existing ACVD, comparing IL-RAs or TNF inhibitors versus placebo or usual care, were selected. The primary outcomes considered were all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and adverse events. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two or more review authors, working independently at each step, selected studies, extracted data, assessed the risk of bias and used GRADE to judge the certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We included 58 RCTs (22,053 participants; 21,308 analysed), comparing medication efficacy with placebo or usual care. Thirty-four trials focused on primary prevention and 24 on secondary prevention. The interventions included IL-1 RAs (anakinra, canakinumab), IL-6 RA (tocilizumab), TNF-inhibitors (etanercept, infliximab) compared with placebo or usual care. The certainty of evidence was low to very low due to biases and imprecision; all trials had a high risk of bias. Primary prevention: IL-1 RAs The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of the intervention on all-cause mortality(RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.58, 1 trial), myocardial infarction (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.04 to 12.48, I² = 39%, 2 trials), unstable angina (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.11, I² = 0%, 2 trials), stroke (RR 2.42, 95% CI 0.12 to 50.15; 1 trial), adverse events (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.22, I² = 54%, 3 trials), or infection (rate ratio 0.84, 95% 0.55 to 1.29, I² = 0%, 4 trials). Evidence is very uncertain about whether anakinra and cankinumab may reduce heart failure (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.94, I² = 0%, 3 trials). Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) was not reported as an outcome. IL-6 RAs The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of the intervention on all-cause mortality (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.12 to 3.74, I² = 30%, 3 trials), myocardial infarction (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.04 to1.68, I² = 0%, 3 trials), heart failure (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.11 to 9.63, I² = 0%, 2 trials), PVD (RR 2.94, 95% CI 0.12 to 71.47, 1 trial), stroke (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.14, 1 trial), or any infection (rate ratio 1.10, 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.37, I2 = 18%, 5 trials). Adverse events may increase (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.23, I² = 33%, 5 trials). No trial assessed unstable angina. TNF inhibitors The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of the intervention on all-cause mortality (RR 1.78, 95% CI 0.63 to 4.99, I² = 10%, 3 trials), myocardial infarction (RR 2.61, 95% CI 0.11 to 62.26, 1 trial), stroke (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.80, I² = 0%; 3 trials), heart failure (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.06 to 12.76, 1 trial). Adverse events may increase (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.25, I² = 51%, 13 trials). No trial assessed unstable angina or PVD. Secondary prevention: IL-1 RAs The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of the intervention on all-cause mortality (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.06, I² = 0%, 8 trials), unstable angina (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.19, I² = 0%, 3 trials), PVD (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.19 to 3.73, I² = 38%, 3 trials), stroke (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.2, I² = 0%; 7 trials), heart failure (RR 0.91, 95% 0.5 to 1.65, I² = 0%; 7 trials), or adverse events (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.09, I² = 3%, 4 trials). There may be little to no difference between the groups in myocardial infarction (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.0.75 to 1.04, I² = 0%, 6 trials). IL6-RAs The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of the intervention on all-cause mortality (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.96, I² = 0%, 2 trials), myocardial infarction (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.07 to 3.04, I² = 45%, 3 trials), unstable angina (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.02, 1 trial), stroke (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.07 to 16.25, 1 trial), adverse events (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.05, I² = 0%, 2 trials), or any infection (rate ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.36, I² = 0%, 4 trials). No trial assessed PVD or heart failure. TNF inhibitors The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of the intervention on all-cause mortality (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.95, I² = 47%, 5 trials), heart failure (RR 0.92, 95% 0.75 to 1.14, I² = 0%, 4 trials), or adverse events (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.56, I² = 32%, 2 trials). No trial assessed myocardial infarction, unstable angina, PVD or stroke. Adverse events may be underestimated and benefits inflated due to inadequate reporting. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This Cochrane review assessed the benefits and harms of using interleukin-receptor antagonists and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors for primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic diseases compared with placebo or usual care. However, the evidence for the predetermined outcomes was deemed low or very low certainty, so there is still a need to determine whether these interventions provide clinical benefits or cause harm from this perspective. In summary, the different biases and imprecision in the included studies limit their external validity and represent a limitation to determining the effectiveness of the intervention for both primary and secondary prevention of ACVD.

Treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction of ustekinumab compared with tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a real-world study.

BACKGROUND: Ustekinumab is an interleukin (IL)-12/IL-23 inhibitor for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: This real-world study compared ustekinumab and tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFis) in Chinese moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients. METHODS: Patient health records of 110 moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients initiating or switching biologics were reviewed, with 31 patients receiving ustekinumab (ustekinumab group) and 79 patients receiving TNFis (TNFi group). RESULTS: Compared with TNFi group, psoriasis area and severity index (PASI)-75 response rate at month 6 (M6) were elevated (87.1% versus 65.8%, p = 0.026) in the ustekinumab group, whereas the rates at month 1 (M1) and month 3 (M3) and PASI-90 response rates at M1, M3, and M6 only showed an increasing trend (all p > 0.050) in the ustekinumab group than the TNFi group. By subgroup analyses, ustekinumab (versus TNFi) was more effective in patients with biologics therapy history than those without. Compared with the TNFi group, the ustekinumab group had lower dermatology life quality index scores and higher patient satisfaction scores at M3 and M6 (all p < 0.050). CONCLUSION: Chinese moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients treated with ustekinumab have a better treatment response at 6 months with improved quality of life and patient satisfaction after 3-6 months of treatment when compared to TNFi.

Pyrazolines inhibiting the activity of the early growth response-1 DNA-binding domain.

To identify compounds inhibiting the activity of the Early Growth Response (EGR)-1 DNA-binding domain, thirty-seven pyrazolines were prepared and their EGR-1 DNA-binding activities were measured. Pharmacophores were derived based on quantitative structure-activity relationship calculations. As compound 2, 1-(5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-3-yl)naphthalen-2-ol, showed the best inhibitory effects against the activity of the EGR-1 DNA-binding domain, the binding mode between compound 2 and EGR-1 was elucidated using in silico docking. The pharmacophores were matched to the binding modes. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays confirmed that compound 2 dose-dependently inhibited TNFα-induced EGR-1-DNA complex formation in HaCaT cells. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction demonstrated that compound 2 effectively reduced the mRNA expression of EGR-1-regulated inflammatory genes, including thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, and IL-31, in TNFα-stimulated HaCaT cells. Therefore, compound 2 could be developed as an agent that inhibits the activity of the EGR-1 DNA-binding domain.

Steroid-Refractory Myocarditis Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Responded to Infliximab: Report of Two Cases and Literature Review.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including anti-programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand (PD-1/PD-L1) as well as anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), have been widely used for treating solid tumors. Myocarditis is a potentially lethal immune-related adverse events (irAEs) caused by ICIs therapy. The treatment of steroid-refractory myocarditis is challenging. We reported two non-small-cell lung cancer patients with steroid-refractory myocarditis induced by ICI. The symptoms were not resolved after pulse corticosteroid therapy and subsequent treatment including intravenous immunoglobulin and mycophenolate mofetil. Considering the level of serum interleukin (IL)-6 decreased by > 50% and level of serum tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) increased during the course of the disease, infliximab was used. Myocarditis gradually alleviated after infliximab treatment. The cases revealed that specific cytokine inhibitors have promising roles in the treatment of steroid-refractory myocarditis. Infliximab could be considered for patients with low level of IL-6 and elevated level of TNF-α.

Merging Natural Product Structures with Pharmaceutical Leads: Unnatural Enantiomers of Estranes as Glucocorticoid Receptor Modulators That Suppress TNF-α and IL-6 Release.

Natural products are widely recognized as valuable starting points for the development of therapeutics, with synthetic tetracyclic triterpenoids (e.g., steroids) being the most well represented among the drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Here, recently developed synthetic tools for concise, asymmetric, and convergent construction of steroidal systems are leveraged to drive a program aimed at identifying novel glucocorticoid receptor (GR) modulators. While glucocorticoids have been extensively used as anti-inflammatory agents, they are plagued by severe side effects that include bone loss, muscle wasting, and metabolic disease. Ultimately, a program targeting the unnatural enantiomers of estranes (ent-estranes) that are practically inaccessible from natural product derivatization (semisynthesis) has resulted in the identification of a new class of potent dissociated GR modulators. We identify several leads with >99% efficacy as antagonists of GR trans-activation (potency within 10-fold of that of mifepristone) and further characterize examples that also inhibit release of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α.

Disseminated MDR-TB missed in a patient treated with TNF inhibitor.

A previously healthy man developed pulmonary symptoms 2 weeks after starting treatment with a tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor. A negative interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) test was obtained prior to TNF inhibitor exposure, without consideration of the fact that the patient was already immunosuppressed and had a previous positive IGRA test 17 months earlier. The patient was treated for pneumonia twice but did not achieve remission. His physical health progressively deteriorated over the following months. Malignancy was suspected but not found. Eight months after the onset of symptoms, Mycobacterium tuberculosis was found in samples from mediastinal lymph nodes, and the patient was diagnosed with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB).This case illustrates the diagnostic challenge of TB, the need to raise awareness of the increased risk of TB in patients treated with TNF inhibitors and the need to increase knowledge regarding the effect of immunosuppressive agents on IGRA tests.

Rotation or change of biotherapy after TNF blocker treatment failure for axial spondyloarthritis: the ROC-SpA study, a randomised controlled study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterised by inflammatory low back pain. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are recommended as a first treatment in axSpA. In case of inadequate response to NSAIDs, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) should be introduced according to the recommendations of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology. Until 2015, only bDMARD was recommended for axSpA in case of failure to anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF). The 2022 Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS)-EULAR recommendation proposed to start an alternative bDMARD but without advocating a switch in mode of action as proposed in rheumatoid arthritis. Since 2015, the inhibition of interleukin (IL)-17 has demonstrated efficacy in axSpA. Then, we designed a randomised multicentre clinical trial to identify the more effective treatment after a first anti-TNF failure in axSpA, comparing an anti-IL-17 to a second anti-TNF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The ROC-SpA (Rotation Or Change of biotherapy after first anti-TNF treatment failure in axSpA patients) study is a prospective, randomised, multicentre, superiority open-label phase IV trial comparing an anti-IL-17 strategy (secukinumab or ixekizumab) to a second TNF blocker in a 1:1 ratio. Patients with an active axSpA (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index >4 or ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS) >3.5) with inadequate 3 months response to a first anti-TNF and with a stable dose of conventional synthetic DMARDs, oral corticosteroids and/or NSAIDs for at least 1 month are included in 31 hospital centres in France and Monaco. The primary outcome is the ASAS40 response at week 24. The secondary outcomes are ASAS40 at weeks 12 and 52, other clinical scores (ASAS20, partial remission rate, ASDAS major improvement rate) at weeks 12, 24 and 52 with the drugs and anti-drugs concentrations at baseline, weeks 12, 24 and 52. The primary analysis is performed at the end of the study according to the intent-to-treat principle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the committee for the protection of persons (Comité de protection des personnes Ouest IV #12/18_1, 6 February 2018) and registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and in EudraCT. Results of this study, whether positive or negative, will be presented at national and international congresses, to national axSpA patient associations and published in a peer-reviewed journal. It could also impact the international recommendation to manage patients with axSpA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03445845 and EudraCT2017-004700-22.

Morphea Associated with Adalimumab Treatment: The Role of TNF-α in Inhibition of Fibrosis.

Anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF-α) comprises a group of drugs that inhibit the action of cytokine TNF-α, and are used to treat diseases mainly caused by this cytokine. An increase in cutaneous adverse events has been observed with similar anti-TNF biologic treatments frequently used in clinical practice.