Müllerian duct cyst: Case report with updates in cellular origin, corresponding immunohistochemistry, and contrast to prostatic utricle cyst.

A 20-year-old male presented to the emergency department with lower abdominal pain, urinary retention, and constipation. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a large cyst on the posterior aspect of the prostate gland; he was ultimately diagnosed with a Müllerian duct cyst (MDC). Although much has been written on the radiologic diagnosis of such cysts, there is a paucity of recent literature concerning the pathological diagnosis. While older studies debated the Müllerian origin of a midline cyst abutting the poster prostate, we believe that with the advent of monoclonal PAX8 (which was positive in this lesion) and monoclonal PAX2 (which was negative), we have strong evidence that the present cyst is indeed of Müllerian origin. Further, there is debate in the literature as to whether MDC is synonymous or distinct from prostatic utricle cyst. We present an interdisciplinary analysis as to the merits and weaknesses of both sides of the debate and how data gathered from the current case could be used in a future, larger study to arrive at a more definitive conclusion.

PAX-8 Expression in Salivary Duct Carcinoma.

Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a high-grade adenocarcinoma resembling breast ductal carcinoma. It accounts for ~10% of malignant tumors of the salivary glands. Most cases show expression of CK7 and androgen receptor. PAX-8 is a transcription factor, with expression reported in renal, Müllerian, and thyroid carcinomas. Previous studies have described an absence of PAX-8 immunostaining in most primary salivary gland neoplasms, including SDCs. However, PAX-8 expression is frequently found in neoplasms that can metastasize to salivary glands, suggesting the possibility that this protein can be used to differentiate SDC from secondary neoplastic involvement of the salivary gland. We evaluated the expression of PAX-8 in 14 cases of SDC from our institution. One case showed diffuse moderate to strong PAX-8 positivity, while 2 tumors showed focal weak staining. Therefore, we conclude that although the majority of SDC are negative for PAX-8, rare diffuse positivity can be seen in these primary salivary gland tumors. This could potentially pose difficulty in ruling out metastatic disease from another PAX-8-positive primary neoplasm.

Immunohistochemical expression of PAX8, PAX2, and cytokeratin in melanomas.

BACKGROUND: Deviations from the classic melanocytic immunophenotype in melanoma can present a diagnostic challenge. PAX8 and PAX2 are common markers for renal or Müllerian differentiation. While most PAX8+ or PAX2+ carcinomas are seldom confused with melanoma, some cases may show a more ambiguous immunophenotype, especially when MiTF family altered renal cell carcinoma (MiTF-RCC) is in the differential diagnosis. Neither PAX8 nor PAX2 expression has been reported in melanoma to date. We aimed to better characterize PAX8, PAX2, and cytokeratin immunoreactivity in a large series of melanomas. METHODS: Tissue microarrays consisting of 263 melanomas were immunostained for PAX8, PAX2, and cytokeratin and graded by an h-score. RESULTS: PAX8 expression was seen in 7.9% of melanomas and was significantly associated with spindle cytomorphology. PAX2 was positive in one (0.4%) melanoma. Cytokeratin positivity was seen in three (1.2%) cases and was associated with metastases. CONCLUSIONS: PAX8 is expressed in a subset of melanomas and may be strong/extensive. As PAX8 positivity does not exclude a diagnosis of melanoma, it should be used in conjunction with other immunohistochemical markers, such as cytokeratin and PAX2, when melanoma, MiTF-RCC, and other PAX8+ tumors are in the differential diagnosis.

PAX8 Expression in Breast Cancer.

PAX8 expression is frequently detected in renal, thyroidal, and Müllerian carcinomas, and PAX8 immunohistochemistry is often used to confirm the origin of these tumors. Tumors metastatic to the breast may masquerade as primary breast lesions. PAX8 is strongly expressed in tumors of Müllerian origin and largely negative in breast primaries, but an immunohistochemical expression of PAX8 in breast cancer has not been systematically evaluated in a large series. We analyzed 266 cases of invasive carcinoma of the breast on tissue microarrays and whole tissue sections with a PAX8 monoclonal antibody. Both the extent (focal or diffuse) and intensity (weak, moderate, or strong) of nuclear staining were assessed in the tumor cells. In total, 16 cases (6.02%) were positive for PAX8 (12 with weak and 4 with moderate staining). Expression was diffuse in 7 cases and focal in 9 cases. All 16 PAX8-positive tumors were histologic grade III invasive ductal carcinomas, 13 of these were triple-negative, 2 were HER2-positive, only and 1 was progesterone receptor-positive only. Strong PAX8 nuclear expression was not seen in any of the cases. PAX8 was negative in breast tumors with neuroendocrine features. Our study demonstrated a low rate of PAX8 expression in breast cancer. When present, PAX8 expression was only seen in high-grade invasive ductal carcinomas, mostly triple-negative. The presence of PAX8 immunoreactivity alone cannot exclude mammary origin, especially when only weak to moderate staining is observed, so the correlation with available clinical and pathologic data helps to ensure an accurate diagnosis.

PAX8: A Highly Sensitive Marker for the Glands in Extragenital Endometriosis.

In cases of extragenital endometriosis or microscopic endometriosis lesions, pathological diagnosis can be challenging because endometriotic stroma and glands represent only a minor component of fibrotic endometriotic lesions. For better accuracy of diagnosis, the development of a sensitive and specific epithelial marker is beneficial. Previous studies showed that PAX8 is a highly sensitive and specific marker for primary and metastatic Mullerian epithelial tumors. Therefore, we sought to examine whether PAX8 is a highly sensitive marker for glands in extragenital endometriosis. Eight and 47 samples of ovarian endometrioma and extragenital endometriosis, respectively, were evaluated in this study. We calculated the percentage of samples positively immunostained for PAX8, CD10, estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PR). PAX8 was positive for endometriotic epithelial cells in 95.7% (45/47) of extragenital endometrioses and in 100% (8/8) of ovarian endometrioses. CD10 was positive for endometriotic stromal cells in 97.9% (46/47) of extragenital endometrioses. PAX8 was strongly positive for glands, even in a CD10-negative case. The expression of PAX8, CD10, and PR was not affected by preoperative hormonal therapy, and the positive rate of ER staining was significantly reduced by preoperative hormonal therapy. In conclusion, PAX8 is a highly sensitive epithelial marker for extragenital endometriosis. This specific expression was maintained under hormonal therapy. It is noteworthy that extragenital endometriosis maintains the expression of this lineage marker, although it occurs at various sites, and its cause and mechanism of development might be different. PAX8 nuclear expression can be useful in detecting extragenital endometriosis in clinical practice.

Epigenetic Changes During Human Thyroid Cell Differentiation.

Objective: It has been demonstrated that the transcription factors TAZ (transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif), paired box gene 8 (PAX8), and NK2 homeobox 1 (NKX2-1) are coexpressed in the nucleus of thyroid cells. Furthermore, TAZ is known to enhance the transcriptional activity of PAX8 and NKX2-1 as well as the key thyroid-specific gene, thyroglobulin (TG), suggesting a critical role for TAZ in the control of thyroid cell speciation. We previously reported that the small molecule ethacridine, identified as a TAZ activator, was able to induce thyroid-specific transcription in endodermal cells differentiated from human embryonic stem (hES) cells using activin A. Since transcription factors are epigenetically regulated in cell differentiation, we investigated the epigenetic changes in the promoter regions of these key transcription factors during in vitro differentiation of hES cells into thyrocytes. Methods: We initially profiled chromatin accessibility using the technique of Assay for Transposase Accessible Chromatin sequencing (ATAC-seq), and then examined DNA methylation and histone acetylation in the promoter regions of the three selected thyroid transcription factors and the thyroid-specific genes during hES cell differentiation. Results: ATAC-seq analysis showed enriched chromatin accessibility of TAZ, NKX2-1, and PAX8 after exposure to activin A and ethacridine. There were no methylation changes found in the NKX2-1, PAX8, and TAZ promoters by bisulfite sequencing. In contrast, acetylation of histone H4, specifically acetylation of lysine 16, was observed in each of the promoters when measured by chromatin immunoprecipitation polymerase chain reaction assays, which correlated with the activity and expression of NKX2-1 and PAX8 as well as sodium/iodide symporter, thyroid stimulating hormone receptor, and TG genes. Conclusions: These results indicate that ethacridine treatment of activin A-derived endodermal hES cells leads to enhanced chromatin accessibility, which, in turn, allows histone H4 acetylation in the regulation of active genes for speciation of thyroid follicular cells from hES cells.

High-Grade Endometrioid Carcinoma of the Endometrium With a GATA-3-Positive/PAX8-Negative Immunophenotype Metastatic to the Breast: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall.

This report describes clinicopathologic findings from the case of a patient with a breast mass that was ultimately diagnosed as a metastatic high-grade endometrioid carcinoma of endometrial origin. The breast lesion as well as the solid areas of the endometrial lesion displayed a similar immunoprofile: GATA3-positive; synaptophysin positive; negative for mammaglobin, gross cystic disease fluid protein-15, chromogranin, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2/neu; and intact expression of the DNA mismatch repair proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. The breast lesion was negative for PAX-8, whereas the solid areas of the endometrial lesion showed focal weak positivity. A review of the literature on GATA-3 expression in endometrial carcinomas found a reported frequency of expression that ranged from 0% to 13% of cases, typically in a patchy, focal, and generally restricted pattern. However, GATA-3 may be diffusely expressed in high-grade endometrial carcinomas. Since the potential for PAX-8 expression to be lost in high-grade endometrioid carcinomas is well known, a GATA-3-positive/PAX8-negative immunoprofile may be encountered in high-grade endometrioid carcinomas of the endometrium, and this composite immunoprofile is a potential diagnostic pitfall when such a lesion is being evaluated in a breast metastasis.

CDX2, SATB2, GATA3, TTF1, and PAX8 Immunohistochemistry in Krukenberg Tumors.

Twenty-six Krukenberg tumors (16 lower gastrointestinal, 4 upper gastrointestinal, and 6 of unknown origin) and their primaries when known were stained with CDX2, SATB2, GATA3, TTF1, and PAX8 using a tissue microarray containing predominantly or exclusively signet ring cells. The most common primary was appendiceal mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma. CDX2 and SATB2 were positive in all known lower gastrointestinal primary tumors and negative in nearly all known upper gastrointestinal primary tumors. Primaries showed identical immunophenotypes to their metastases. Among cases of unknown primary origin, 3 were positive and 3 were negative for CDX2 and SATB2. Chest images, upper endoscopies, colonoscopies, appendectomies, and mammogram were performed with negative results in all, 4, 2, 2, and 1 cases, respectively. No cystoscopies were attempted. PAX8, GATA3, and TTF1 were negative in all cases. The literature was reviewed with emphasis on immunohistochemistry of signet ring cell-containing carcinomas from the appendix, colon, stomach, breast, lung, and bladder. Three quarters of gastric primaries stain for CDX2 and only rare examples stain for SATB2. Colorectal primaries (most of them) and appendiceal primaries (all of them) are positive for CDX2 and SATB2. GATA3 stains almost all breast primaries and approximately half of bladder primaries. All pulmonary primaries are positive for TTF1. PAX8 is negative in the gastric, colorectal, and appendiceal primaries reported. This study shows that the panel of immunostains is useful in confirming the site of origin of a metastatic Krukenberg tumor when one is known and has limited diagnostic value for diagnosing metastases of unknown origin.

Primary Renal Synovial Sarcomas: PAX 8 Immunostaining and Unusual Molecular Findings.

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a high-grade sarcoma that rarely involves the kidney. Eleven renal SS cases were collected in our institution. Immunostaining features and molecular changes of renal SS were further elucidated in this study. PAX 8 was focally positive in 1 monophasic SS and diffusely positive in both the spindled and epithelial components in 1 biphasic SS. These 2 PAX8 expressing renal SS were confirmed by the presence of the classic t(X;18) translocation. Our study also revealed the presence of extra copies of the SS18 in one biphasic SS and one poorly differentiated SS. The SS18 (SYT) gene rearrangement is useful for confirming the SS diagnosis. However, a negative test (FISH or RT-PCR) does not rule out the diagnosis. Although not as common, other chromosomal alterations, such as polysomy 18, indeed occur in renal synovial sarcoma.

PAX8 expression in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma is less than those reported in early studies: a multi-institutional study of 182 cases using the monoclonal antibody MRQ-50.

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is an aggressive malignant tumor composed of undifferentiated thyroid follicular cells. Pathological diagnosis of ATC can be challenging as the tumor may show morphological overlap with other neoplasms with anaplastic morphology. Immunohistochemical demonstration of thyroid origin facilitates the diagnosis of ATC. Previous studies using the polyclonal anti-PAX8 antibody 10336-1-AP suggested that PAX8 was the most sensitive marker, expressed in up to 80% of ATC. According to a 2018 NordiQC report, the monoclonal anti-PAX8 antibody MRQ-50 has become the most commonly used anti-PAX8 antibody worldwide. However, validation of this antibody in ATC is lacking. In this study, we recruited 182 ATC cases from seven institutions. Pathology slides were subjected to histology review. PAX8 immunohistochemistry using the MRQ-50 antibody was performed in whole tissue slides (n = 147) or tissue microarray sections (n = 35). We found PAX8 expression in 54.4% of the cases, which was significantly lower than those reported in prior studies with the polyclonal antibody. PAX8 expression was positively correlated with the presence of an epithelial pattern (63.6% vs 37.5%, p = 0.0008) and a coexisting differentiated thyroid carcinoma component (71.6% vs 44.3%, p = 0.0004), but was not associated with age, gender, specimen type, or presence of giant cell and sarcomatoid patterns. In conclusion, we demonstrated PAX8 expression using the monoclonal antibody MRQ-50 in only half of the cases in a large ATC series. Pathologists should be aware that PAX8 expression in ATC is less than those reported in early studies to avoid misdiagnosis.

PAX8 Expression in Solitary Fibrous Tumor: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall.

PAX8 is used as a diagnostic aid in classifying retroperitoneal (RP) spindle cell tumors. PAX8 positivity in a spindled RP tumor is typically associated with sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (SRCC). However, PAX8 expression in solitary fibrous tumor (SFT), a tumor not uncommon to the RP, has not been extensively studied. We investigated the expression of PAX8 in SFTs and other spindle cell RP tumors. We collected 30 SFT, 23 SRCC, 11 gastrointestinal stromal tumors, 2 synovial sarcomas, 6 dedifferentiated liposarcomas (DDLS), 4 well differentiated liposarcomas (WDLS), and select other tumors. We identified nuclear PAX8 expression in 13 of 30 (43%) SFT, 0 of 6 (0%) DDLS, and 1 of 4 (25%) WDLS. Twenty-eight of 30 (93%) SFT, 0 of 23 (0%) SRCC, 2 of 6 (33%) DDLS, and 1 of 4 (25%) WDLS showed nuclear STAT6 expression. All gastrointestinal stromal tumors were negative for both PAX8 and STAT6. Of the 13 SFT showing PAX8 expression, 8 showed diffuse expression and 5 expressed PAX8 focally. Extrapleural SFTs were more likely to express PAX8 compared with pleural SFTs (10/13; 77% vs. 3/17; 18%, respectively; P=0.00117). Twenty of 23 (87%) SRCC expressed PAX8; the sarcomatoid component of all 23 SRCC was negative for STAT6. Of the other spindle cell tumors studied, 1 of 2 synovial sarcomas and 1 of 2 histiocytic sarcomas showed PAX8 expression. Pathologists should be aware of the potential pitfall of the relatively frequent expression of PAX8 by SFT and STAT6 expression in liposarcoma. PAX8 expression by a spindle cell lesion of RP would not allow distinction between SFT, SRCC, or sclerosing liposarcoma by itself. A STAT6/PAX8 phenotype excludes SRCC.

PAX8-positive Biphasic Synovial Sarcoma Expressing Hormonal Receptors.

PAX8, estrogen receptor-α (ERα) and progesterone receptor (PR) are markers usually expressed in neoplasms of müllerian origin. We report a subdiaphragmal mass in a 41-year-old woman corresponding to a malignant biphasic tumor with nests of epithelial-like cells forming variably sized cyst-like spaces alternating with spindle cells forming intersecting fascicles. The later were juxtaposed to coalescent densely cellular nodules of spindle cells with appreciable cytologic atypia and mitotic counts up to 30/10 high-power fields. The tumor cells were AE1/AE3, EMA, ERG, ERα, PR, and PAX8 positive whereas spindle cells showed reduced immunopositivity for these markers, especially marked in coalescent nodular areas, with notable exception of PAX8, which was diffuse and strongly positive. The possibility of an endometrioid carcinoma with spindle cells was considered by the referring pathologist, but fluorescent in situ hybridization showed rearrangement of SS18 gene in 48 of 50 tumor nuclei, rendering a diagnosis of biphasic synovial sarcoma, the first reported in the English literature to the best of our knowledge expressing PAX8, ERα, and PR. Further studies evaluating the expression of these markers in synovial sarcoma and other sarcomas are needed, as sometimes the findings may lead to misdiagnosis as other neoplasms including those of the female genital tract. Additional molecular tests may be helpful to determine the molecular mechanism of this aberrant immunoprofile, which could be directly or indirectly related to t(X:18).

Well-differentiated papillary mesothelioma: A 17-year single institution experience with a series of 75 cases.

We present our experience with 75 cases of well-differentiated papillary mesothelioma (WDPM) that were diagnosed at our institution between 2000 and 2017. The patients included 58 females and 17 males with age ranging from 18 to 69 years (mean, 42 years). Clinically, the vast majority of WDPMs were incidental findings during laparotomy or laparoscopic surgery for a variety of benign or malignant disease. The lesion manifested as either a small solitary nodule or multiple miliary nodules on the peritoneum or serosal surfaces of internal organs. Histologically, 67 cases were consistent with a classical WDPM, of which 6 cases contained microinvasive foci and 1 case had malignant transformation. Eight cases were hybrid tumors with variable combined component of adenomatoid tumor (n = 4), multicystic mesothelioma (n = 2), and both (n = 2). By immunohistochemistry, besides calretinin, D2-40, CK5/6 and WT1, 94% (29/31) of cases also showed immunostaining for PAX8. In comparison, PAX8 staining was only present in 12% (6/50) of epithelioid malignant mesothelioma selected as control cases. Follow-up information available in 46 cases revealed no signs of tumor progression or local recurrence except for the case that showed transformation to a fully malignant mesothelioma after a period of 15 years. Our comprehensive study further expanded the clinical and histopathological spectrum of WDPM. Compared with epithelioid malignant mesothelioma, PAX8 staining is highly sensitive and specific for WDPM (P < 0.001).

Positivity for GATA3 and TTF-1 (SPT24), and Negativity for Monoclonal PAX8 Expand the Biomarker Profile of the Solid Cell Nests of the Thyroid Gland.

Solid cell nests (SCNs) are usually distinguished on conventional H&E-stained sections; however, the morphological heterogeneity in SCNs and hyperplasia of these ultimobranchial body remnants can mimic other diagnostic entities including but not limited to papillary microcarcinoma. In order to confirm the thyroid follicular epithelial origin and exclude the possibility of SCNs, most diagnosticians use immunohistochemical biomarkers of thyroid follicular epithelial cells and/or those of SCNs. While the expression profile of monoclonal PAX8 has not been reported previously in SCNs, the status of TTF-1 expression using the 8G7G3/1 clone has been inconsistent among several studies. Given the potential diagnostic pitfalls, this series investigated the expression profile of GATA3, monoclonal PAX8, and TTF-1 (SPT24), along with p63, p40, monoclonal calcitonin, monoclonal CEA, and HBME-1 in a tissue microarray (TMA) of 56 SCNs. SCNs were all diffusely and strongly positive for TTF-1 (SPT24), p63, and p40, and were negative for monoclonal PAX8 and calcitonin. Positivity for GATA3 and monoclonal CEA was identified in 41 (73.2%) and 36 (64.3%) of SCNs. In addition, 18 (32.1%) SCNs displayed HBME-1 reactivity. These findings expand the immunohistochemical correlates of SCNs by demonstrating positivity for GATA3 and TTF-1 (SPT24), and negativity for monoclonal PAX8. The identification of monoclonal CEA expression and HBME-1 in SCNs also underscores the limitations of these select biomarkers in the distinction of C cell proliferations and papillary microcarcinoma, respectively. The findings of this series also suggest that positivity for TTF-1 (SPT24) alone should not be used to confirm the thyroid follicular epithelial origin. Therefore, the combined use of TTF-1 (SPT24) and monoclonal PAX8 in association with p63 or p40 provides an accurate distinction of SCNs.

Diagnostic Utility of Pax8, Pax2, and NGFR Immunohistochemical Expression in Pediatric Renal Tumors.

Pediatric renal tumors (PRT) with small round blue or spindle cell morphology can be diagnostically challenging and only a limited number of immunohistochemical markers have been documented to help in the diagnosis: paired box (Pax) 2 and nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR) positivity have been demonstrated in Wilms tumor (WT) and clear cell sarcoma of the kidney (CCSK), respectively. However, the immunohistochemical expression of these markers in other PRT remains unknown. This study investigated Pax8, Pax2, and NGFR immunophenotype in a large series of PRT. Pax8 and Pax2 showed an identical staining pattern, and were expressed in all (100%) WT while most CCSK were negative. All congenital mesoblastic nephromas, metanephric stromal tumors, primitive neuroectodermal tumors, desmoplastic small round blue cell tumors, most rhabdoid tumors, and synovial sarcomas were negative for Pax8. NGFR was expressed in 96% of CCSK (diffuse expression in 91%). Only a minority of WT stained for NGFR: 16% showed expression in the blastemal and 25% in the mesenchymal components. NGFR expression was noted in synovial sarcomas (67%, with diffuse expression seen in only 1 case, 8%), rhabdoid tumors (19%), cellular congenital mesoblastic nephromas (13%) and metanephric stromal tumors (12.5%). Primitive neuroectodermal tumors and desmoplastic small round blue cell tumors were negative for NGFR. In conclusion, Pax8/Pax2 and NGFR are sensitive markers for the diagnosis of WT and CCSK, respectively. However, their specificity is limited by variable reactivity within a subset of other renal neoplasms.

Observations on the origin of ovarian cortical inclusion cysts in women undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.

AIMS: Evidence suggests that up to 70% of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSCs) arise potentially from fallopian tube fimbriae, and that many of the remaining cases arise from within the ovary in cortical inclusion cysts (CICs) with a Müllerian phenotype (Müllerian-CICs). It has been proposed that Müllerian-CICs arise either from metaplasia of mesothelial ovarian surface epithelium (OSE) entrapped within the ovary after ovulation or from normal tubal cells entrapped postovulation. However, this proposal is controversial. We therefore conducted a study of CICs in women, most of them BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy at our institution from 2000 to 2014. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used immunohistochemistry for PAX8, a Müllerian marker, and calretinin, a mesothelial marker to classify CIC cells. In 499 CICs from 59 women, 72.3% were positive for PAX8 (PAX8+ ): ≥10% of CIC cells positive; 43.5% positive for calretinin (calretinin+ ). The proportion of PAX8+ CICs increased from 62.9% in premenopausal to 80.5% in postmenopausal patients. The proportion of calretinin+ CICs decreased from 52.6% to 35.6%, respectively. There was significant overlap of PAX8 and calretinin positivity: 82 (16.4%) CICs were PAX8+ /calretinin+ ; 43 (40.2%) of these 82 demonstrated PAX8+ /calretinin+ in the same cells. CONCLUSIONS: These results, and the increased ratio of PAX8+ to calretinin+ CICs from premenopausal to postmenopausal, show that many PAX8+ CICs probably arise from metaplasia of OSE-derived CICs. The proportion of PAX+ /calretinin- CICs arising from OSE-derived CICs is unclear, but our results strongly support the proposal that many Müllerian-CICs arise from OSE via metaplasia.

Iodinated TG in Thyroid Follicular Lumen Regulates TTF-1 and PAX8 Expression via TSH/TSHR Signaling Pathway.

Our previous study showed that highly iodinated thyroglobulin (TG) inhibited thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) and paired box gene 8 (PAX8) expression, but the potential mechanism remains unclear. In this study, we constructed a thyroid follicle model in vitro to mimic its natural physiological structure and explored how iodinated TG in the follicular lumen tuned TTF-1 and PAX8 expression. Our data showed that lowly iodinated TG enhanced PKA activity while upregulation of both TTF-1 and PAX8 expression; and that highly iodinated TG triggered PKC activity while suppression of TTF-1 and PAX8 expression. Further, PKA agonist alone could increase TTF-1 and PAX8 expression while PKC agonist decreased TTF-1 and PAX8 level. If blocking PLC-PKC pathway using PKC-specific inhibitor, highly iodinated TG significantly promoted the expressions of TTF-1 and PAX8, and similarly PKA-specific blocker moderately inhibited TTF-1 and PAX8 expression. And opposite tendencies of TTF1 and PAX8 aberrant expression were observed in the condition of low iodinated TG when blocking PLC-PKC and cAMP-PKA signaling pathways. Our results indicated that iodinated TG manipulated TTF-1 and PAX8 expression through PLC-PKC and cAMP-PKA pathways, and highly iodinated TG played inhibitory role via PLC-PKC pathway from the TTF1 and PAX8 perspective while low level of iodinated TG was an activator through cAMP-PKA pathway. Our findings proved that iodinated TG in thyroid follicular lumen regulated TTF-1 and PAX8 expression through thyroid stimulating hormone/thyroid stimulating hormone receptor (TSH/TSHR) mediated cAMP-PKA and PLC-PKC signaling pathways. J. Cell. Biochem. 118: 3444-3451, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Comprehensive Analysis of PAX8 Expression in Epithelial Malignancies of the Uterine Cervix.

Immunohistochemistry for transcription factor PAX8 (paired box gene 8) has recently emerged as a powerful tool in the differential diagnosis of gynecologic malignancies, especially when encountered at a metastatic site. Previous studies have shown PAX8 expression in the majority of ovarian and endometrial carcinomas; however, data regarding PAX8 expression in cervical tumors are limited. In this study PAX8 expression was evaluated in 136 epithelial malignancies of the uterine cervix-including 103 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), 20 adenocarcinomas of usual type, 6 endometrioid adenocarcinomas, and 7 adenosquamous carcinomas-on tissue microarray slides. PAX8 immunopositivity was defined as at least weak nuclear staining in >5% of tumor cells. The majority of SCC were PAX8 negative (92%; 95/103), whereas among the endocervical adenocarcinomas PAX8 was positive in 70% (14/20) of the usual type and in 83% (5/6) of the endometrioid-type tumors. PAX8 expression was observed in 29% (2/7) of adenosquamous carcinomas. We conclude that PAX8 immunostain is negative in most cervical SCC and is less frequently expressed in endocervical adenocarcinomas as compared with the previously reported high sensitivity for ovarian and endometrial adenocarcinomas. When evaluating possible primary sites of a metastatic lesion, a negative PAX8 immunostain does not rule out common cervical epithelial malignancies.

Immunohistochemical Detection of Pax8 and Napsin A in Canine Thyroid Tumours: Comparison with Thyroglobulin, Calcitonin and Thyroid Transcription Factor 1.

Expression of thyroid transcription factor (TTF)-1 corroborates a thyroid origin of neoplasms. Thyroglobulin and calcitonin immunohistochemistry (IHC) can distinguish between a follicular and C-cell origin of thyroid tumours, respectively. Pax8 (expressed by normal canine thyroid follicular cells) and napsin A (expressed mainly by C-cells) labelling was compared with labelling for TTF-1, thyroglobulin and calcitonin in 114 canine proliferative thyroid lesions. All 81 follicular tumours expressed thyroglobulin and were negative for calcitonin; 79/81 (98%) of these tumours expressed TTF-1 and Pax8 and 60/81 (74%) expressed napsin A. All 25 C-cell lesions expressed calcitonin and were negative for expression of thyroglobulin; 22 (88%) were positive for TTF-1, 13 (57%) for Pax8 and 24/24 for napsin A. Six mixed follicular-medullary carcinomas expressed all five markers. Both carcinosarcomas expressed TTF-1 and napsin A, and one each of these tumours expressed thyroglobulin, calcitonin or Pax8. Pax8 expression was also detected in epididymal cells, endometrial cells and vas deferens epithelium, in Sertoli-like ovarian cells, and in some cases of ovarian adenoma, pancreatic carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma and Sertoli cell tumour. Napsin A was also detected in adrenocortical cells, ovarian granulosa cells, epididymal and endometrial cells, as well as in some renal cell carcinomas, pulmonary adenocarcinomas and Sertoli cell tumours. In summary, Pax8 was as sensitive as TTF-1 and slightly less sensitive than thyroglobulin for identification of follicular tumours, but had low sensitivity for C-cell tumours. Napsin A was as sensitive as calcitonin for C-cell neoplasms, but was less sensitive than thyroglobulin for follicular neoplasms. Thus, these markers are sensitive and, except for renal cell carcinoma (for Pax8, napsin A) and pulmonary adenocarcinoma (for napsin A), are specific thyroid tumour markers.

PAX8 is transcribed aberrantly in cervical tumors and derived cell lines due to complex gene rearrangements.

The transcription factor PAX8, a member of the paired box-containing gene family with an important role in embryogenesis of the kidney, thyroid gland and nervous system, has been described as a biomarker in tumors of the thyroid, parathyroid, kidney and thymus. The PAX8 gene gives rise to four isoforms, through alternative mRNA splicing, but the splicing pattern in tumors is not yet established. Cervical cancer has a positive expression of PAX8; however, there is no available data determining which PAX8 isoform or isoforms are present in cervical cancer tissues as well as in cervical carcinoma-derived cell lines. Instead of a differential pattern of splicing isoforms, we found numerous previously unreported PAX8 aberrant transcripts ranging from 378 to 542 bases and present in both cervical carcinoma-derived cell lines and tumor samples. This is the first report of PAX8 aberrant transcript production in cervical cancer. Reported PAX8 isoforms possess differential transactivation properties; therefore, besides being a helpful marker for detection of cancer, PAX8 isoforms can plausibly exert differential regulation properties during carcinogenesis.